Innovations. Product. Process. Goods Services Technological Organisational 1. INTRODUCTION Basics of innovations

Similar documents
THE ROLE OF THE AUTONOMOUS PROVINCE OF VOJVODINA DEVELOPMENT FUND Maja Štrbac 1, Danilo Tomić 1, Branislav Vlahović 3

Active Geodetic Network of Serbia

BART PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN BARENTS TOURISM Assessing tourism knowledge pool in Murmansk region institutions

Evaluation of realized investments in Belgrade s and Danube region

OPEN DAYS 2015 LOCAL EVENTS COUNTRY LEAFLET REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

KOSOVO. Explore the Balkans - Business Opportunities

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at:

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)

Belgrade Chamber of Economy.

ISRAEL- COUNTRY FACTS

Vera Zelenović. University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia. Dragan Lukač. Regional Chamber of Commerce Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Master Thesis IMPLEMENTATION OF PROMOTION IN ENTERPRISES OF MILK PROCESSING / CASE KABI DAIRY

The Cuban economy: Current Situation and Challenges.

Kosovo Roadmap on Youth, Peace and Security

Sweden. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Considering an Agritourism Enterprise?

LATVIA. Report by Janis Garjans, Division of Museums of Ministry of Culture of Latvia. Introduction Key issues

Planning and Policy Tourism Vice Ministry Sustainable Tourism Planning Direction General International Expert Workshop on Biodiversity Mainstreaming

HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT

Golubinci Kupinovo rural area

STATISTIČKI INFORMATOR BROJ 2. STATISTICAL BULLETIN

Regional cluster landscape Serbia

MAPs sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Role of Gauteng in South Africa s Backpacking Economy

Cross-border region Drina - Sava

Morocco. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding. Ref. Ares(2016) /06/2016

Elaboration and Analysis of Wood Processing Industry Residuals in Rasina and Toplica Region and Aleksinac and Raška Municipalities

REPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION FOR INSPECTION ACTIVITIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA

THEME D: MONITORING THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF ECOTOURISM: EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN ALL ACTORS

MUNICIPALITY OF PRESEVO

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

The results of the National Tourism Development Strategy Assessments

Region Business Profile

Air Routes as Economic Development Levers. John D. Kasarda, PhD

Europass Curriculum Vitae

DNEVNIK JVC Novi Sad

EU MACRO-REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE CARPATHIAN REGION. Gabriela Szuba Ministry of the Environment, Poland Modra, June 2017

Kosovo s economic and investment potential

Region Business Profile

IV International Symposium Agrosym /AGSY M NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT OF UPPER DANUBE

Industry and occupation of population in Montenegro

MLADI BORAC JSC Sonta

REGIONAL ASPECTS OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME LEVEL IN VOJVODINA PROVINCE IN FUNCTION OF BASIC PRODUCTION FACTORS

Regional cooperation with neighboring countries (and Turkey)

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Japan

Case Studies presentations. Kraljevački Kajmak. Marguerite Paus and Magali Estève (IED/ ETH Zurich and AGRIDEA)

REDD+ IN YUCATAN PENINSULA

A Proposed Framework for the Development of Joint Cooperation On Nature Conservation and Sustainable Tourism At World Heritage Natural sites.

Ministry of environment, mining and spatial planning activities and methane action plan of republic of Serbia Dragana Mehandžić Ministry of

Tourism and Wetlands

Rural NSW needs a bottom-up strategy to create a better tourism experience.

Tatjana Brankov, PhD Member of the Executive Board of the Serbian Association of Agricultural Economists

Water Management in Serbia

The Austrian Federal Economic Chamber. Representing the Interests of Business

Poland. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Land Consolidation in Serbia

MAJEVICA AD HOLDING BACKA PALANKA

Prof. Dr Željko Vaško Doc. Dr Tihomir Predić MSc Boris Marković

Estonia. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Israel. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Jadran JSC, Nova Gajdobra

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

Participation tourism development in Aurland

Importance and Developments

IOM KOSOVO NEWSLETTER QUARTERLY EDITION JANUARY MARCH 2018

Netherlands. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK IN SERBIA

KOSOVO INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES

Competition for Air Traffic Management: The Air Navigation Service Provider s perspective

E-tourism Usage Patterns of Tourism Business in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Paisarn Kanchanawong, Chodok Charungkon, Songsak Poonoi

FICHE DE PRÉSENTATION DE PROJET TITRE : BOURGAS REGION - FIRE DANCE, BIRDS, NATURE AND SEA PAYS : BULGARIE

Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 December 2011

Foregone Economic Benefits from Airport Capacity Constraints in EU 28 in 2035

Sustainable tourism in Holbox through local development

The Timok River Basin in Serbia

Project Data Sheet BASIC PROJECT DATA. Rehabilitation and Development of Transport and Navigation on the Sava River Waterway. Full project title:

Dr. Dimitris P. Drakoulis THE REGIONAL ORGANIZATION OF THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE IN THE EARLY BYZANTINE PERIOD (4TH-6TH CENTURY A.D.

Introduction to Sustainable Tourism. Runde October

SMEDEREVO / PREMIUM INVESTMENT LOCATION

JÄMTLAND HÄRJEDALEN. Strategy 2030: For the Tourism Industry. Jämtland Härjedalen leaders in nature based experiences

Chile. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Sremska Mitrovica has great potential. It is related to both natural and human resources to which we are very proud of.

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2010

THE ALBANIAN NATIONAL MINORITY IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA. Minority Rights Guaranteed by Internal Regulations

Management of national park directorates in Hungary, land purchase

Economic Development, Institutions and Corruption: Kosovo and its Neighbours

Korea. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Content. Invest in Calatayud

GTSS Summary Presentation. 21 February 2012

REPUBLIC OF KOSOVO Ministry of Trade and Industry. reasons IN KOSOVO

hotels our business & passion

Iceland. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

B-TEAM PROJECT BROWNFIELD DAYS DEBRECEN HAJDÚ-BIHAR

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Slovenia

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Chile

Cultural Heritage for Local Economic Development

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

The influence of producer s characteristics on the prospects and productivity of mastic farms on the island of Chios, Greece

Colombia. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

An Incentives Guide to BUSINESS IN NAGOYA

Transcription:

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Basics of innovations Innovation is development and application of new ideas or skills for the purpose of commercialisation of new or improved products, processes and services which enhance economic and social prosperity. Innovations can be categorise into the following innovation types: Innovations Product Process Goods Services Technological Organisational Innovation are engines for: economic growth, competitiveness, income creation and firm profit, employment creation, especially in rural areas, changes towards environmental improvement and sustainable development, meeting changing consumer needs and demographics. 1.2. The Innovation Process in an Organisation The process of innovation in an organisation can be categorised in the following model of stages in the innovation decision process (Rogers 1995): 1. Prior conditions - Previous practice - Felt needs / problems - Innovativeness - Norms of the social system 2. Knowledge the characteristics of the decision making unit are - Socio-economic characteristics (education, social status, economic orientation,...) - Personality variables (attitude towards education, fatalism, achievement motivation, ) - Communication behavior (interconnectedness, active information seeking, change agent contact)

3. Persuasion related to the perceived characteristics of the innovation - Relative advantage - Compatibility - Complexity - Trialability - Observability 4. Decision (adoption or rejection) 5. Implementation 6. Confirmation 1.3. External factors determining innovation the institutional environment The type and degree of innovation on company level are the result of internal and external factors. The external factors concern characteristics of the market and the sector specific environment, such as the level and type of competition or given technological conditions. They concern regional conditions or the local milieu, such as the knowledge and information level and the availability of qualified workers, research and education institutions, and the quality of transport and communication infrastructure. A further external factor constitutes the relevant legal and political system and its policies. For inducing product innovation, the following external or regional factors have been found to play, in general, a major role (Davelaar 1987): - highly qualified workforce - technical and economic universities and research institutions (knowledge centres) - company level services (economic and technical consultancy, market research, legal services) - sufficiently many potential suppliers and subcontractors - sufficiently big markets and good market access - transport infrastructure, especially to enable personal communication - access to capital, especially risk capital For the adoption of process innovation, the following factors have been found, in general, to be important (Maier and Tödtling, 1996): - density of companies of the same or similar branches - sales and service nets of new technologies that enable the process innovation - access to public consulting and transfer service - availability of specifically educated workforce

2. Serbia and Montenegro forestry Elementary Information 2.1. Present Status of the Forestry Sector in Republic of Serbia The Republic of Serbia and Montenegro is a country with total area of 102 173 km 2, out of which to Serbia belong 88 587 km 2, and to Montenegro 13 812 km 2. It spreads in southern Europe, in Balkan region In Serbia s forestry, the two main categories of ownership are state and private forests. According to the data in the Programme of forest protection and enhancement in the period 1996-2000, of the total area of forests and other wooded land (2,654,572 ha), 56.7% is in the state and public ownership (SE Srbijašume and SE "Vojvodinašume" 51.7%, SE National Parks 3.2%, SE Beli izvor Vrnjačka Banja 0.3%, water management and agricultural organisations 1.3% and Teaching Base of the Faculty of Forestry in Belgrade 0.2%), and 43.3% are private forests (Republican Fund of Forests R Serbia, Belgrade, 1996). The highest percentage of state forests is in Vojvodina (95.5%), in Kosovo the percentage is somewhat lower accounting for 62.1%, and in Serbia without Provinces private forests prevail with 56.3%. The area of forests and woodland of the Republic of Serbia is 2 654 577 ha accounting for 26.7% of the land area. The area covered by forests is 2 360 400 ha, or 88.9% of the total area of forests and woodlands; treeless area is 294 177 ha. Deciduous forests represent 90.7% of the total forest area, coniferous forests 6.0%, and mixed forests of broadleaves and conifers 3.3%. Serbia has three geographical regions: lowland (Vojvodina), mountains (a large part of Serbia) and valleys (Kosovo and Metohija). 3. Enterprise 3.1. Description of the enterprise and the business area 3.1.1. Short history Forest Estate Sremska Mitrovica manage with forests in Srem, administrative patr of Province Vojvodina. Vojvodina in geografical means is flat part of Republic of Serbia. Forestry in this region has tradition of over 100 years. Taking care about forests in this region date of XIX centuries. In 1814, was brought first law about forestry.

The first environmental measurement on this region made in 1863. And from that time there was 10 environmental measurements. Two last measurements were made by typological base. In 1974. founded 4 forest administrations. F.E. Sremska Mitrovica was found in 1948. as an independent company for forests development and management. Since 1991. F.E. Sremska Mitrovica. is the forest district of the State forest enterprise Srbijašume with headquarters in Belgrade. In 2002, Government of Republic of Serbia founded State Enterprise Vojvodinašume, divided into 4 forest-economic regions. One of these regions is Srem s forest-economic region. Whit this region manages F.E. Sremska Mitrovica. 3.1.2 Business area: Forest Estate Sremska Mitrovica governs whit forest on 42.573 hectares, whit 9.237.609 m 3 volume of wood and 228.132. m 3 current volume increment. Srem s forest economic region is a plane on the left side of the river Sava. Altitude of this region is between 72 and 80 meters height above sea level. Common species are Common oak, Euroamerican popular, Narrow leaved ash, common hornbeam, Biter oak, Acacia, On the territory of F.E. Sremska Mitrovica exists 4 hunting districts. The common game in this hunting districts are: deer, roe, boar, pheasant, fox, hare, There are 9 special nature reserves. In the special reserves Vraticina in forest 450 years old. Special nature reserves Obedska Bara is unique safe reserve of birds in Europe. 3.1.3 Basic activities Basic activities of S.E. Vojvodinasume are following: Culture, maintaining and revival of forests Reconstruction and inundation of degraded forests and bushes Production of seeds and seedlings New forests and seedlings raising Production of forest species, using and transport of other forest products Usage of a forests for the recreation Usage of a forests for growth and hunting of game Projecting, building and maintaining forest roads, parks and recreation areas Making programs, projects and bases of ruling over the forests soil surveying for special purposes, Expertise and advising works in forests for private proprietors Trade Export-import Economic cooperation with foreign countries Improvements of forest functions

3.1.4 Organisation F.E. Sremska Mitrovica is organized in 6 units: Forest administration: Morović Forest mechanization, Višnjićevo, Klenak, Kupinovo and Headquaters in Sremska Mitrovica. Forest Estate Sremska Mitrovica Headquarter Sremska Mitrovica Forest administration Morovic Forest mechanisation Morovic Forest administration Visnjicevo Forest administration Klenak Forest administration Kupinovo table 1. Table of organization units in F.E.. Sremska Mitrovica 3.1.5 Staff F.E. Sremska Mitrovica has 627 employees. There are 43 engeneers of forestry. 3.1.6 Annual turnover Annual crop is 160.000 m 3 (60% common oak). 3.1.7 Products Main products are: Wood products (Oak, Poplar), Firewood and cellulose wood Broadleaf. Other products are: Mushrooms, medicinal herb. 3.1.8 Markets and costumers Wood industry and Pulpwood industry. Companies: NOVI DOM KOMBINAT Sremska Mitrovica, DIP SAVA Hrtkovci, LIPA Sid, STRELA Jukovo, Pulpwood factory Matroz Sremska Mitrovica. 4. Innovation activities 4.1 Development and implementation of the innovation process Implementations of information system. Forest enterprise regarding to modernization of working process start with implementation GIS technology. The application and combination of modern technology. Implementation of GIS Technology and developing of information system provide more efficiency in organization process.

Improvement of internal organization and efficiency of a system for storing and tracking documents. Usage of information system avoids work with documentation in paper form and help in tracking documents of distant forest administration. 4.2 Detailed description of the innovation Usage of GPS and information system in forestry going through three stages: First stage - scean maps - put scean maps into GIS programme georeference - ploting border of forest units - build range - link range whit data bank - notation Secong stage - making topic maps - making charts - analyses - printing maps Third stage - establishing data base for data from first and second stage - collecting data from all forest administration - linkage server of data base with State Enterprise Vojvodinašume, S.E. Srbijašume, Forest Bureau and Ministry for Forestry. 4.3 Roles of actors The list of entities that were active in the innovation process includes Norwegian Forestry Group, Ministry of forestry, Faculty of Forestry of Belgrade. In this mutual action actors involved find that F.E. Sremska Mitrovica as one of the best enterprise in the field of forestry can carry out innovation process. Norway Government establishes the budget for process of implementation of modern information system and Faculty of Forestry provide education for employed in Forest Enterprise. Implementation GIS technologies was supported by Norway government. Education was on Faculty of forestry in Belgrade. Ideas for this project given by management of this enterprise and also from Norway government. 4.4 Analysis of the innovation process and future plans This innovation project is base for future implementation of new technologies in production process also in organization process. Early results of innovation process were twofold. Employees involved in project acquired new knowledge about new technologies, and process of collecting of information from the field become more efficient. Process of mapping becomes easier and collected data were more precise.

If forest specialist going to the forest with the field computers, equipped with GPS, they can find his exact position in the forest, then they will open the online connection (GPRS) with Forest Register Database - he can see the forest map and all database information: 5. Conclusions: Ownership information Detailed map with limitations (if they are applicable); Detailed information from the forest management plan, what kind of activities has been done in that stand and what is allowed to do. Introduction of new technology is close connected with a possibility that forest specialist need to get, using data bases, all information about forest plan management from internet, illegal logging can be stop using new technologies in scooping and data processing of data in terrain with mobile technologies. Main problems that the forest enterprises without innovation have are: too old equipment and mechanizations, no up date information, lack of support from expert. With introduction of these kind of technology some problems will be solve such as: High productivity Economical growth Easiest and more specific working in the field Establishing of transparent digital data base, which provides up to date data In the future efificient management of Forest Estate have to manage with a diferent goals such as: 1. Transparent and useful data 2. Increase motivation 3. Promote profitability of forestry 4. Advance the economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable management and utilisation of forests. On the end, innovations are very important because they bring economical growth for enterprises, country and region. Innovations are necessary for the competition of private sector. But, innovation is risky and prone to fail but not to innovate is risky too.