PRESPA BIOSPHERE RESERVE MANAGEMENT MACEDONIAN PERSPECTIVE

Similar documents
Ohrid Lake and Prespa Lake, Sub basin s on Crn Drim river basin International Workshop, Sarajevo, Bosna and Hercegovina May 2009

Integrated Management of Shared Lakes Basins. Ohrid and Prespa Lake -Transboundary Cooperation-

Transboundary Water Management in Republic of Macedonia

Protection of Ulcinj Saline

SEE PhytoChemNet Workshop

TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF MARINE AND COASTAL HABITATS ASIA- PACIFIC DAY FOR THE OCEAN

BIODIVERSITY END SPECIES UNDER THREAT IN OHRID-PRESPA BASIN. Workd by: Erjona Uka

Nature Conservation Agency (NCA) Salacgrīva 05/07/2018

Montenegro and Albania cooperate on Lake Skadar

Caring for our Lake our Future


Forms of Natural Protection in Greece

Draft LAW. ON SOME AMENDAMENTS IN THE LAW No.9587, DATED ON THE PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY AS AMENDED. Draft 2. Version 1.

European Union Delegation in Albania Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Presence in Albania

Zhulieta Harasani, MBA PhD. Petrit Harasani The shared Transboundary Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Lake Ohrid Region

4) Data sources and reporting ) References at the international level... 5

Special nature reserve and ornithological reserve Scope of implementation (local, Local national)

Towards Strengthened Governance of the Shared Trans-boundary Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Lake Ohrid Region

SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN DRAFT ROOF REPORT INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL APPROACH

GOVERNANCE. Three countries, one future

We, Ministers, assembled in Berlin for the International Conference on Biodiversity and Tourism from 6 to 8 March 1997

THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK IN SERBIA

Group of specialists European diploma on protected areas CoE, Strasbourg, 8 March 2017

Next steps, way forward

The Regional Coral Reef Task Force and Action plan. 27 th ICRI. Cairns Australia July 2012

CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS. Standing Committee. 38 th meeting Strasbourg, November 2018

Members of the El Péñón Ecological Society monitoring birds, this helped with the scientific information.

Tourism and Wetlands

Global Sustainable Tourism Destinations Criteria

The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park (Romania)

EUROPEAN UNION STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION EUSDR. Pillar II Protecting the Environment in the Danube Region

Creation of a Community-managed Biodiversity Park in the Saloum Delta of Senegal. Voré Gana Seck Director GREEN Senegal for People, Land, Ocean

Speech by H.E. Fatmir Mediu, Minister of Environment of Albania

Lake Ohrid. our shared responsibilities and benefits. Protecting

Congo names four large Ramsar sites

Paul Sturm Roberto Viqueira Ríos

Terrestrial Protected Area Nomination: Central Mangrove Wetland South-West, Grand Cayman

Transboundary coopration on water management

Boatswain bay biodiversity reserve

An NPS Wetland of International Significance!

Case Study: 1. The Clarence River Catchment

How should the proposed protected area be administered and managed?

Resolution XI.7. Tourism, recreation and wetlands

1. Thailand has four biosphere reserves which located in different parts of the country. They are as follows;

Country Report of the Democratic People s Republic of Korea

PCN Annex: GEF Data Sheet

Evian Encounter 2006 The Carpathian Wetland Initiative

Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Romania-Ukraine. Presentation of cross-border cooperation concepts DDBRA & Ukraine

Data on Albanian Biodiversity and Mapping

Michipicoten Island Regional Plan

STATE OF PLAY OF DATA ON EMERALD SITES IDENTIFICATION (BELARUS)

Participatory Protected Area Management in Barra del Colorado Wildlife Refuge, Costa Rica A protected area with people

Protected Area Network in Finland

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

HELLENIC REPUBLIC Voluntary National Review on the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 16 July 2018

NEST Kick-of meeting

Introduction: Table 1: Former Yugoslavia Republic of Macedonia Map and Brajcino Village Area. Source: Exploringmacedonia.com

Achievements and results June 2015 April 2017

Online Application Form

Alpine Outdoor sports recent developments, nature compatibility & good practices for visitors guidance

The Ramsar Convention

LAKE OHRID. Our Lake, Our Future. World Heritage Supplement

Biosphere Reserves of India : Complete Study Notes

ICRI Monaco January 2010

CITIES AND REGIONS FOR TOURISM: THE CAPE TOWN EXPERIENCE CITIES SUMMIT COP13 I 10 DECEMBER 2016

German Financial Cooperation: Support for the management of the extended Drin River Basin

Order of the Minister of Environment #39, August 22, 2011 Tbilisi

Aquatic insect surveys at Mount Magazine State Park and Hobbs State Park Conservation Area with implementation of an educational component

LIFE+ URBANCOWS - Restoration of urban coastal meadow complex in Pärnu town, Estonia. Bert Holm, PhD.

Barents Euro-Arctic Council Tenth Meeting of the Ministers of the Environment 9 November 2011 Umeå. Declaration

ECORREGIONAL ASSESSMENT: EASTERN CORDILLERA REAL ORIENTAL PARAMOS AND MONTANE FORESTS

No Activities Deadlines Responsible 1.

SELF-ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

ABCG Presentation, Washington DC: Increasing Conservation Land, Wildlife Protection and Benefits to Landowners

U.S. Activities in Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands and the Wider Caribbean. NOAA and the US Coral Reef Task Force

Biosphere Reserve of IRAN. Mehrasa Mehrdadi Department of Environment of IRAN

Overview of Protected Areas Management in Nepal. Hari Bhadra Acharya Under Secretary Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Nepal

REGIONAL AGREEMENT AND FRAMEWORK FOR MARINE MAMMALS CONSERVATION IN THE WCR: THE SPAW PROTOCOL AND THE MARINE MAMMAL ACTION PLAN

IV International Symposium Agrosym /AGSY M NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT OF UPPER DANUBE

Nature conservation, protected areas & ecological connectivity

A Proposed Framework for the Development of Joint Cooperation On Nature Conservation and Sustainable Tourism At World Heritage Natural sites.

ΙΕΝΕ 2011 Scientific Workshop. Highways and Wildlife: How do they coexist? Kastoria, September 22, 2011

APPENDIX. Alberta Land Stewardship Act AMENDMENTS TO THE SOUTH SASKATCHEWAN REGIONAL PLAN

MEETING CONCLUSIONS. Andean South America Regional Meeting Lima, Peru 5-7 March ECOTOURISM PLANNING

Europe s Living Heart

Overview Guandu Nature Park s Restoration

State of Conservation Report Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal) (N 120)

Twelve Apostles Marine National Park Australia

Geoscape Toronto The Oak Ridges Moraine Activity 2 - Page 1 of 10 Information Bulletin

The results of the National Tourism Development Strategy Assessments

Socio-demographic and Economic Profiles of the Regions in the Republic of Macedonia

BEFORE PROJECT THE BEGINNING

Public Seminar 30 October 2018, Lisbon. Water sector in B&H

Watchorn Provincial Park. Management Plan

Third Environmental Performance Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina: recommendations

Department of Environment, Climate Change & Water NSW. Stakeholder feedback

Protected Areas & Ecotourism

ECOTOURISM. Hill & Mountain Ecosystems

Reconciling Conservation and Investment in the Gambella Omo Landscape, Ethiopia

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

Transcription:

PRESPA BIOSPHERE RESERVE MANAGEMENT MACEDONIAN PERSPECTIVE Secretariat by Ohrid, 10.03.2016

Prespa Ohid TBB reserve

Biodiversity richness trans-boundary level Total Species richness Registered over 1500 species within the trans-boundary Prespa region High species endemism 50 animal species and 19 plant species endemic to the Prespa watershed, 9 endemic fish species (5 endemic to the Balkans & 4 endemic to Prespa) have been recorded. Biodiversity hot spot with national importance 356 species identified on MK-Prespa reflect 76% of total species recorded in the country Mosaic of heterogeneous land forms, vegetation types and land use practices-unique trans-boundary landscape 4 National parks (2 MK, 1 AL, 1 GR) 1 Monument of Nature (Prespa Lake 1 Park of Nature Ezerani reserve (formerly Strict Protected Area)

Institutional and legal context for protected areas management in Prespa Biosphere Reserve Galichica National Park (II category protected area) Law on proclamation of Galichica as National Park Management entity-public Entity established my MoEPP Pelister National Park (II category protected area) Law on proclamation of Pelister as National Park Management entity-public Entity established my MoEPP Ezerani Park of Nature (IV category protected area) Law on proclamation of Ezerani nature reserve as park of nature (Official Gazette No.24/2012) Management entity-municipality of Resen designated by MoEPP Prespa Lake Monument of Nature (III category protected area) Law on proclamation of Prespa Lake as monument of nature (Official Gazette No.24/2012) Management entity-municipality of Resen designated by MoEPP

Prespa Lake & Ezerani nature values and importance First Ramsar site (1996) Important Bird Area (Bidrlife International), Important Plant Area (Plant) acc. Birdlife International system (supports life of Dalmatian Pelican (VU), Pygmy cormorant, relict population of endemic Goosander (Mergus merganser). Important Plant Area-IPA according to the PlantLife International which supports existence of important European plant species: Waterwheel plant (Aldrovanda vesiculosa), Floating fern (Salvinia natans) and Water Chestnut (Trapa natans) Important area part of the established national Emerald network, adequate to the Natura 2000 network for EU member states according to the Bern Convention and Birds and habitats directives

Prespa Lake & Ezerani nature values and importance (cont.) Prespa Lake with its littoral belt and for its natural beauties, geomorphological, hydrological, hydrobiological and other scientific values (Article 1 from Law on proclamation) One of the most important ornithological localities in Europe 216 birds species recorded in Ezerani reserve and Prespa Lake presents 66% country's avifauna and 42% of Europe`s birds species Dalmatian Pelican with more than 1.200 pairs live, feed, nest and breed on Prespa Lake

Natural heritage values Cultural and historic values Lake ecosystem Forest ecosystems River ecosystem Agro-ecosystems Brajchinska Fish ponds Kranska Golema reka Marsh ecosystems Grassland ecosystems

Key challenges and impacts in Ezerani and Prespa Lake protected areas management Surface and ground water quality deterioration Inappropriate land use practices Use of agriculture environmental unfriendly practices (eutrophication) Inappropriate agricultural and communal waste management (solid waste, pesticide & fertilizer packaging) Discharge of untreated wastewaters from the local villages in the vicinity of the Ezerani protected area Illegal fishing and hunting activities and sand and gravel excavation from the area's shoreline Wetland drainage for shifting towards different land use patterns Low public awareness on the importance of the ecosystem values, goods and services of the area mainly due to the former approach of designation of the protected area and management setting up!!!

Key strategic documents/acts for management of protected areas in Prespa Biosphere Reserve (national level) Ezerani Park of Nature Study for valorization of natural values of the Ezerani protected area (supported by UNDP) Management plan for Ezerani protected area for the period 2012-2021 (supported by UNDP) Prespa Lake Monument of Nature Study for valorization of natural values of the Prespa Lake protected area (supported by UNDP) Management plan for Prespa Lake protected area for the period 2014-2024 (supported by UNDP)

Trans-boundary level of cooperation in Prespa Biosphere Reserve management Species and habitats conservation action plans (supported by UNDP) Priority species and habitats conservation management plans - Brown Bear, caves and baths, Graecian Juniper forests, reedbeds, mountain tea Trans-boundary monitoring study for the Prespa Park area Document includes identification and selection of indicators and parameters of trans-boundary importance for monitoring of water, aquatic vegetation, biodiversity, socio-economy and land-use Participatory field protocols and field surveys, capacity development for environmental monitoring in the three littoral states

Integrated ecosystem management approach: Strengthening the participatory process of managing with the area and enhancing the involvement of the affected local communities Conducting comprehensive study of the overall natural and socioeconomic values of the protected area-revalorisation study Developing protected area management plan according to the best recommendations of the revalorisation study and global best practices on protected areas management planning conducted in highly participatory manner throughout involvement of all relevant stakeholders (e.g. Coordination body or Council) Strengthening the capacity of the management body (technical assistance, knowledge and experience sharing on best practices, management planning targeted capacity building trainings to the personnel Total Ecosystem Valuation (TEV) assessment of the protected area for bringing in functional protection of this valuable ecosystem, balanced use of the natural resources and justifying application of restoration measures. First ever done assessment in the country!!1

Goods and services for the Ezerani`s ecosystems Direct values Commercial and recreational fishing Hunting Timber and firewood Hay Sand Wildlife viewing Research opportunities Education opportunities Nature tourism Indirect values Flood mitigation Nutrient abatement Toxic abatement Sediment trapping Wildlife habitat Non-use (existence) values National/global biodiversity significance With system of prioritization affected communities agreed on: Restoration of former fish ponds and diversification of Golema Reka river delta to enhance wetland's capacity as biofilter and improve water quality-activity crucial for all park's goods and services.

Type of value Ecosystem Service Baseline value Effective conservation value Direct use Fishing 893,339.58 893,339.58 Hay 147,241.35 147,241.35 Reed for fuel 0 N/A Sand 2,897,639.16 N/A Research opportunities 38,298.00 114,894.01 Education opportunities 110,107.41 553,455.86 Wildlife viewing 28,106.16 797,375.68 Indirect use Nutrient abatement N/A (wastewater) 5,637,349.69 (runoff 19,178,263.64 ) Flood control N/A N/A TOTAL 3,277,656.67 8,143,656.17 Type of cost Source of funding Baseline cost Effective conservation cost Direct conservation costs Construction and maintenance of fish ponds Foreign investment 0 338,701.23 Landowner compensation Local/national 0 120,750.00 Capital, maintenance and operation Local 0 162,509.17 Indirect conservation costs Landowner opportunity costs Local/national 0 239,346.73 Capacity building and education Foreign 0 3,325,245.99 Total costs 0 4,186,553.12 Net benefits 3,277,656.67 3,957,103.05

Use of Total Economic Valuation (TEV) assessment helped in identifying and achieving: What are the values of ecosystem goods and services of the protected area? How does the scenario of effective conservation which includes ecological restoration compare to the business scenario over the long term? Raised awareness of the economic values of effective conservation (local population, financial planners, decision makers to create climate for sustainable policy creation and behavioral change) Evaluate cost and benefits of specific habitat management actions (to inform conservation and public funding decisions) Identify financial opportunities for the park and neighbouring communities (park's provision of ecosystem services)

Strengthened & enhanced institutional and human resource capacities Ranger services consisted of three highly equipped and knowledge rangers for protection of the Ezerani and Prespa Lake protected areas

Thank you