A Brief Overview of the Rio Grande Compact 04/26/06

Similar documents
Colorado s Compacts. Craig Cotten Division Engineer

Dr. Christopher Brown New Mexico State University GEF Project Rio Meeting Ciudad Juárez, México 3-5 October 2006

One Source, Multiple Challenges: The Future Evolution of Water Policy and the Case of the Colorado River

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION, UNITED STATES AND MEXICO

Successful Experiences in Rio Grande/Rio Bravo Watershed Management

Wilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill

STATE OF NEW MEXICO S INITIAL DISCLOSURES. The Plaintiff, State of New Mexico ex rel. State Engineer ( State ), hereby makes its

MEMO TO STATE PUBLICATION PROGRAM LIBRARIES June 2, 2005

January 14,2010. Ms. Linda Bassi Colorado Water Conservation Board 1313 Sherman Street, Room 723 Denver, CO Dear Linda,

Natural Factors Affecting the Level of Osoyoos Lake

3.0 OVERVIEW OF HUECO BOLSON

Attachment O Verified Statement of Christopher Banet Page 1 of 7

4180 acre-feet minimum conservation pool

EL PASO S DESALINATION EFFORTS

BIG HORN RIVER. Big Horn Canal Bluff Fritz Highland Hanover Kirby Lower Hanover Lucerne Tillard Upper Hanover

International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control Annual Report to the International Joint Commission

SECTION 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE RIVER BASIN

Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead Draft EIS

International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control Annual Report to the International Joint Commission

INTRODUCTION 250,000

Guide to MS416 Albert Bettle Papers

2014 Colorado River Annual Operating Plan Colorado River Management Work Group (CRMWG) Final Consultation September 5, 2013

International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control Annual Report to the International Joint Commission

DROUGHT AND SCARCITY PLANS IN THE BRAVO RIVER BASIN

Spanish Land Grant History of Santa Teresa and Sunland Park Abridged by Dr. Paul Maxwell Taken from the NM Office of the State Historian

CASE NO. 2019CW10 (REF NO. 12CW118).

WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT

David Johnson. Tom, Attached please find the final scoping letter and figures for your review. David

Annual Report to the. International Joint Commission. from the. International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control for

SUSTAINABLE ECOTOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN THE EMBERÁ INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES, CHAGRES NATIONAL PARK, PANAMA

Piedra River Protection Workgroup Meeting #5 Feb. 21, 2012 Ross Aragon Community Center, Pagosa Springs

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE

MANAGING FRESHWATER INFLOWS TO ESTUARIES

Catchment and Lake Research

1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO (719) TTY (719)

SHELBY RANCH. unique places. Offered By: real estate

Water Use for Agriculture in Priority Rivers Basins

Colorado Springs Utilities Spring 2016 Update. CEO Jerry Forte Leon Young Service Center, April 13, 2016

MARCHING AHEAD. Water Conservation through Public Participation FOR HINDI EDITION SEE PAGE NO.53. For Official Circulation only

Bat Cave Canyon Ranch 2,920 acres Jeff Davis County, Texas

RiverWare User Group Meeting, february Migration Lerma-2004 model, from Stella to RiverWare

Index to Major Southern Pacific Company Files of importance

Poudre River District 3. Irrigation Ditch Construction in Fort Collins - Late 19 th Century

Phoenix Habitat Restoration Projects

NATIONWIDE PERMIT ACTIONS APRIL - JUNE 2014

LESOTHO HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Natural Resources Journal

Water Management in the United States and the Fate of the Colorado River Delta in Mexico

No UNITED ARAB REPUBLIC and SUDAN Agreement (with annexes) for the full utilization of the Nile waters. Signed at Cairo, on 8 November 1959

Policy PL Date Issued February 10, 2014

Issue Brief A Political Storm Over the Nile

BORDER WEST EXPRESSWAY (LOOP 375)

Equitable Water Apportionment on the Canadian Prairies

MIÑO O AND LIMIA BASINS

Unit 13: La Entrada The Spanish Enter New Mexico

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE March 2009 Report No.: AB4607 Project Name

Chapter 16 WESTERN EXPANSION AND CONFLICT ( )

Guánica Bay Watershed Initiative

Tonopah Irrigation District

City Council Report. Mayor and City Council Susan Cline, Director, Public Works, Civil Engineering

Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

FLOW REDUCTION IMPACTS ALONG RIVER NILE IN EGYPT

The Effects of Glen Canyon Dam on the Sacred Navajo Land. Jennifer Jenkin Barry Goldwater High School 2009

OFFICIAL MEDIA & PRESS KIT Updated November 2014

Meeting Agenda. Why are we here? Getting Started. Designated Uses. Water Quality Standards

Module 1 Educator s Guide: Representative Discussion Points Investigation 3

Hydrological study for the operation of Aposelemis reservoir Extended abstract

Colorado s Instream Flow Program at 40. ICWP Annual Conference October 16, 2013 Denver, Colorado

DIDYMO SURVEY, LOWER FRYINGPAN RIVER, BASALT, COLORADO 2015

TRINITY RIVER CORRIDOR

No, Agreement relating to emergency deliveries of Colorado. maps and scheduie). Adopted at Ciudad Juiirez on.

Mark West Creek Flow Study Report

7KH'LVSXWH2YHU6KDUHG:DWHUVRIWKH 5tR*UDQGH5tR%UDYR

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

White Oak Creek. Recreational Use Attainability Analysis Summary of Findings. Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas

Closure Method County State Laguna Pueblo 404(F) Activity not. Activity not. Activity involve discharge into NONwaters.

CREDIT LINE: Small Maps Collection, PP-MS 255, Arizona Historical Society-Papago Park

Water Quality Report for Auburn Ravine Water Year

WP4.4 Cordevole MCA alternatives description

2012 Colorado Planning & Management Region Report

Withdrawn Due To No Permit Required (NPR) Baca CO. Verified Without Special Conditions Chaffee CO. Verified Without Special Conditions Chaffee CO

1. International Conventions 2. South African Legislation 3. Swaziland Legislation

Mud Creek and West Mud Creek

Lake Chelan Operations

APPENDIX G. The WAP Conservation Landscape and Focal Areas

Weymouth & Hingham (ARAWH) Draft Report: Weymouth Water Supply & Regulatory Review

San Diego County. The San Diego County Courthouse. Part 1 of 6: San Diego.

AGENCY SCOPING MEETING

Hydraulic Report. Trail 5 Snowmobile Trail Over Mulligan Creek. Prepared By: COLEMAN ENGINEERING COMPANY Karisa V. Falls, P.E.

Utah Nevada California Arizona New Mexico Baja California Texas Sonora Chihuahua Coahuila de Zaragoza Sinaloa Durango Nuevo León Zacatecas San Luis

Recommendations for Renewal of the International Joint Commission s Osoyoos Lake Order

REDD+ IN YUCATAN PENINSULA

I called Joe and Mark, two trike pilots in El Paso to let them know we were coming. They arranged hanger space for us at Cielo Dorado Airport.

Why are the underground fuel tanks being removed and replaced with above ground tanks?

Trails and Towers El Camino Real and the Verde Power Line in Santa Fe County

John Groesbeck Ryan Umina Neil Mudjer Dan Armgardt

HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF THE TOURISTIC BERTHING IN ASWAN CITY

DATE: January 19, WCA Governing Board. Johnathan Perisho, Project Manager. Mark Stanley, Executive Officer

Are there successful fish passes? Lessons from South America. Paulo Santos Pompeu Federal University of Lavras

Transcription:

A Brief Overview of the Rio Grande Compact 04/26/06

The New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission Investigate, Protect, Conserve, and Develop the State s Waters and Stream Systems Negotiate and Administer Interstate Compacts Oversee Development of Regional Water Plans & State-Wide Water Plan Federal Issues Management (Endangered Species Act water issues)

The Upper Rio Grande Basin

Background Late 1800 s Drought and Increased Irrigation Diversion in Colorado 1896 Federal Embargo on Water Development 1906 Treaty of 1906 1916 Elephant Butte Reservoir Operational Early 1920 s Federal Water Development Embargo Lifted Late 1920 s Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District Construct the MRGCD diversion dams, canals, drains, and El Vado Reservoir

Background (Continued) 1929 Interim Rio Grande Compact Sets limits on depletions of water 1935 El Vado Reservoir Completed Supreme Court Lawsuit by Texas 1935-1937 Rio Grande Joint Investigation 1938 Rio Grande Compact Signed, Supreme Court Lawsuit dismissed

The Rio Grande Compact Signed in 1938 in Santa Fe following those four decades of controversy to: Effect an equitable apportionment of the waters of the Rio Grande above Ft. Quitman, Texas Remove all causes of present and future controversy Promote interstate comity

The Rio Grande Compact The Compact apportions the waters of the Upper Rio Grande Basin amongst the three States The Compact does not affect the obligations of the United States to Indian Tribes or impair their Rights San Juan-Chama Project Water is not subject to Compact apportionment

The Rio Grande Compact - Colorado Colorado is Required to Deliver Water to New Mexico at the Stateline

The Rio Grande Compact - Colorado

The Rio Grande Compact - Colorado COLORADO ANNUAL COMPACT ALLOCATION - RIO GRANDE 1400 1200 ANNUAL COMPACT ALLOCATION (1000 a 1000 800 600 400 In above average year, flow in excess of 560,000 acre feet must be delivered to New Mexico. Available for Depletion in Colorado Colorado Delivery Obligation to New Mexico 200 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 ANNUAL FLOW AT DEL NORTE (1000 af)

The Rio Grande Compact - Colorado COLORADO ANNUAL COMPACT ALLOCATION - CONEJOS RIVER 700 600 ANNUAL COMPACT ALLOCATION (1000 a 500 400 300 200 In above average year, flow in excess of 224,000 acre feet must be delivered to Rio Grande. Available for Depletion Delivery Obligation to Rio Grande 100 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 ANNUAL CONEJOS RIVER INDEX SUPPLY (1000 af)

The Rio Grande Compact New Mexico New Mexico is Required to Deliver Water to Texas at Elephant Butte Reservoir based upon flow at Otowi Bridge

The Rio Grande Compact New Mexico

Middle Rio Grande Compact Allocation and Obligation 3000 ANNUAL COMPACT ALLOCATION CHART 2800 2600 ANNUAL COM PACT ALLOCATION (1000 acre-feet) 2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 In above average year flow in excess of 405,000 acre-feet must be passed below Elephant Butte Reservoir New Mexico Delivery Obligation to below Elephant Butte Dam 200 Available for Depletion above Elephant Butte Dam in New Mexico 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 ANNUAL INFLOW AT OTOWI (Otowi Index Supply, 1000 acre-feet)

New Mexico s Compact Compliance 300 Rio Grande Compact Cumulative Delivery Departure 1940-2006 200 Departure in Thousands of AF 100 0-100 -200-300 -400 2006 Credit = 37,100 AF -500-600 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Time (Calendar Years)

New Mexico s Compact Compliance NMISC Goal Maintain compliance while allowing for efficient and effective use of the available supply Status in Compliance since the late 1960 s Activities Middle Rio Grande Project Operations of the Low Flow Conveyance Channel ISC/Reclamation Coop Agreements River System Maintenance Metering and Modeling Pilot Channel Work Other SJC Water Depletion Offset and Municipal Pumping

Rio Grande Floodway in 1952 Looking downstream from south boundary of Bosque del Apache (courtesy of Reclamation)

Compact Storage Restrictions If We Accrue Deliveries to Texas: Water Must be Retained in Storage in Post- 1929 reservoirs to the extent of the debits and cannot be used If Usable Storage in Rio Grande Project Reservoirs is low: cannot increase the amount of native water stored in post-1929 reservoirs An accepted Relinquishment allows for some upstream storage

The Compact and Elephant Butte Reservoir Colorado and New Mexico Credit Water is held in Elephant Butte Reservoir Spills from Elephant Butte Reservoir eliminate credits and debits

The Rio Grande Compact - Texas From Elephant Butte Reservoir to Fort Quitman, Texas 57% of the Rio Grande Project Supply delivered to New Mexican s

The Rio Grande Project

The Rio Grande Project Delivers water to the Republic of Mexico and irrigable lands in New Mexico and Texas During full allocation years, Reclamation delivers about 931,800 AF at diversion dam canal headings with a reservoir release of 790,000 AF Hudspeth County Irrigation District is not part of the Rio Grande Project

RIO GRANDE PROJECT STORAGE 2,500,000 Maximum Available Storage Capacity 2,000,000 ACRE-FEET 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Note: Storage values as of Jan 1 each year. Elephant Butte and Caballo Reservoirs included in analysis. Value for Jan 1, 2005 is estimated