Project Application. General Information ODOT PID. ODOT District. Primary County (3 char abrv)

Similar documents
Project Application. General Information ODOT PID. ODOT District. Primary County (3 char abrv)

Project Application. General Information ODOT PID. ODOT District. Primary County (3 char abrv)

Strategic Signal Timing Changes = BIG Results. Barbara Jones, PE, PTOE DGL Consulting Engineers, LLC Senior Traffic Engineer

I-75 in Hamilton County Project Termini

Basic Project Information

Transportation Improvement District (TID) Exercise New Castle County Unified Development Code

NORTHEAST OHIO AREAWIDE COORDINATING AGENCY MEMORANDUM

Other Principle Arterials Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local

Major Projects Overview

Yonge Street / Highway 401 Improvements Update. Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services

PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

2nd Quarter. AEDC is pleased to present the Anchorage Quarterly Economic Indicators Report for the second quarter of 2010.

FHWA P/N Guidelines. Corridor Relationship. Highway 22 Segment 1 - US 169 to CSAH 2 Relevance / Documentation of Need

7272 WISCONSIN AVENUE LOCAL AREA TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

Westbrook Station. Transit Oriented Development Opportunity

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

Appendix 4.1 J. May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

Welcome to Dayton Parkway Interchange Open House. November 26, 2018

Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Update Dulles Area Transportation Association August 25, 2009

Public Open House. Chief Peguis Trail Project

A VISION FOR I-95. January 12, Delaware Department of Transportation

2008 DEKALB COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN (UPDATE)

Macleod Trail Corridor Study. Welcome. Macleod Trail Corridor Study Open House. Presentation of Proposed Design Concepts

November 11, 2009 BY . Planning and Growth Management Department 110 Laurier Avenue West, 4 th Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1. Dear Mr.

10.0 Recommendations Methodology Assumptions

Memorandum. Roger Millar, Secretary of Transportation. Date: April 5, Interstate 90 Operations and Mercer Island Mobility

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

PDF compression, OCR, web optimization using a watermarked evaluation copy of CVISION PDFCompressor

1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics

MEMORANDUM. Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc.

Airport Planning Area

THE IMPACT OF THE TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT ACT ON COLUMBUS & THE STATE OF GEORGIA GEORGIA PLANNING ASSOCIATION SEPTEMBER 27, 2017

4. Proposed Transit Improvements

Request to Improve Transit along the Dufferin Street Corridor

Transportation TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

Score. Category. Access Aesthetics Community Resources

Need County Priority Needs Identification Major Projects/Emerging Taking Care of the System (TCOS) 1=High 2=Medium 3=Low

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

US 380 FEASIBILITY STUDY

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

Proposed Bicycle Lanes on Yonge Street from Queens Quay to Front Street

Construction underway. STATUS: 229 5,190 5,419 5,305 STIP REFERENCE #FR /01/2013

FEASIBILITY STUDY REFINED CONCEPT 1 PROJECT A

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Section 106 Update Memo #1 Attachment D. Traffic Diversion & APE Expansion Methodology & Maps

2016 Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Application

RW Bruhn Bridge and Approaches Project

Union Square. & Park Place. Project Summary Submitted by DeHoff Development Company

Williamsburg Town Hall Meeting

RELATED SANTA CLARA SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA. RELATED SANTA CLARA Santa Clara, CA

DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com

Area of Potential Effect Report

Project Deliverable 4.1.3f Individual City Report - City of San Dimas

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

Georgetown-Lewes Rail/Trail Study. Rail/Trail Study: Cool Spring to Cape Henlopen State Park New Road Extension (House Resolution No.

Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Program: Eligibility of Ground Access Projects Meeting

MEMORANDUM. Open Section Background. I-66 Open Section Study Area. VDOT Northern Virginia District. I-66 Project Team. Date: November 5, 2015

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

A. From I-68 in Monongalia County, West Virginia to SR 6119 in Fayette County, Pennsylvania 1

Resolution of Support for the Ettrick Site as the Future Location of the Tri-Cities Multimodal Station

State Route 8 Corridor. Northern Summit County s Path to Success

Appendix B Connecting Track Options Evaluation Criteria

FNORTHWEST ARKANSAS WESTERN BELTWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY

Annual Port Review. June 22, 2016

EPPERSON INDUSTRIAL PARK

5.1 Traffic and Transportation

Huntington Metro Station Joint Development

Funding Application. Project Information. Contact Information. Project Description. 1 of 11. April 18th, :12 PM

Honorable Members of the Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure and Sustainability Committee

APPENDIX J MODIFICATIONS PERFORMED TO THE TOR

HOV LANE PERFORMANCE MONITORING: 2000 REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

I-66 Inside the Beltway Feasibility Study

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program History and Project Update. PowerPoint 3

HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM

Update of MDX Open Road Tolling

South Bay Metro Green Line Extension

DENISON STREET EXTENSION. Transportation Committee. January 14, Feasibility Study

Transportation Supporting Dulles Airport

Route 141 and I-44 Design-Build Project Community Involvement Group. March 21, 2016

Welcome. Sign in Pick up comment form Visit stations to learn more Submit your comment form

Construction Staging Adelaide Street West

Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact

HAMPTON ROADS CROSSINGS PATRIOTS CROSSING AND HRBT

TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

1 SUBWAY EXTENSION TO VAUGHAN CORPORATE CENTRE - OPERATING AGREEMENT UPDATE

FORT WASHINGTON OFFICE CENTER TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS By Orth-Rodgers & Associates, Inc., Adrienne Eiss, PTP August 8, 2008

N VANCOUVER AVE PARCEL

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

Evaluation of High-Occupancy-Vehicle

MARSHALL Subdivision. Township of Springwater, County of Simcoe. Traffic Brief for: Ontario Inc. Type of Document: Final Report

The Importance of Service Frequency to Attracting Ridership: The Cases of Brampton and York

EXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION

FIRST WEEK UPDATE: 66 EXPRESS LANES INSIDE THE BELTWAY Data from first four days shows faster, more reliable trips on I-66

Transcription:

Current Status (Tier 1, Tier 2 or New) Proposed Status (Tier 1 or Tier 2) Project Application General Information ODOT PID ODOT District County (3 char abrv) Facility Name (i.e. route, rail, terminal, or port name) New 78053 Three LOR LOR-90-22.26 Project Sponsoring Agency City of Avon Project Manager (Contact Person) Phone Number James Piazza (440) 937-7545 Email Address jpiazza@cityofavon.com Local Jurisdictions (i.e. list all cities, counties and townships) City of Avon in Lorain County Project Description Description of Work Construct a three quadrant diamond interchange with the Eastbound entrance ramp designed as a loop ramp at I-90 and Nagel Road. Due to its proximity to the interchange, improvements required at the Nagel Road and Chester Road intersection are considered part of the interchange construction project. Nagel Road will be widened to two through lanes in each direction between Avon Road/I-90 EB ramps and Chester Road, with left turn lanes at each intersection and right turn lanes where needed. Purpose and Need The purpose of the project is to 1.) reduce congestion to provide improved access to I-90, and 2.) support growth consistent with existing land use plans. Both interchanges that serve the City of Avon, as well as intersections at adjacent arterials, are over capacity under current traffic volumes. As the area continues to grow, traffic congestion will continue to increase. The City of Avon desires to meet the needs of existing business and residents, and to provide the necessary transportation infrastructure to better manage future growth in these areas. The City experienced a high residential growth rate between 1990 and 2000, and leads the area in percentage change in population density at +55.97%. In contrast, only 25% of the industrial zoned land in Avon has been developed. The City recognized that the current infrastructure is unlikely to be able to support the anticipated demand created by development of the industrial area. Community & Economic Growth and Development Factors Land Use Plan Exists Adopting Appropriate Land Use Measures Land Use Plan Zoning based on Coord. with T-Plan T-Plan Part of State/MPO Long Range Plan (Yes, No or N/A) (Yes, No or N/A) (Yes, No or N/A) (Yes, No or N/A) Yes Yes Yes Yes

Priority on County or MPO Long Range Plan Percent of Land Being Redeveloped Improves Business Access Improves Invest & Employ * Sub-county 5 Yr Unemployment Rate * Sub-county 5 Yr Poverty Rate (%) (Yes or No) (Yes or No) (%) (%) 25% Yes Yes * Optional. If omitted, the 5 year rates for the primary county will be obtained from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.bls.gov) and US Census Bureau (www.census.gov).

Transportation Factors Reduces Fuel Consumption Reduces Ozone Precursors Connects Transportation Modes (Yes or No) (Yes or No) (Yes or No) Yes Yes Yes If project connects transportation modes, please explain how A Park-N-Ride will be established with Lorain County Transit ODOT NLFID Existing Road Facilities (If applicable) Begin End Location Termini Log Point Log Point Road (or Cnty/Rte #) (x.xx) (x.xx) (i.e. from street 1 to street 2) (Yes or No) LOR-90-22.26 (Insert additional rows as needed one row for each existing roadway to be improved) Name or Designation Beg Lat New Road Facilities (If applicable) Beg End End Location Termini Lon Lat Lon Road (xx.xxxx) (xx.xxxx) (xx.xxxx) (xx.xxxx) (i.e. from street 1 to street 2) (Yes or No) (Insert additional rows as needed one row for each new roadway to be constructed) Element Name Transit Facilities (If applicable) Peak Hour Ridership VMT Reduction Benefit/ Cost (Riders) (%) (x.xxx) (Insert additional rows as needed one row for each transit facility element) Freight Facilities (If applicable) Element Name Freight Volume / Facility Capacity Truck Reduction Benefit/ Cost (x.xxx) (%) (x.xxx) (Insert additional rows as needed one row for each freight facility element)

Project Phase Project Development Completed By (Agency Name) Actual / Projected Completion (MM/DD/YYYY) Planning Study City of Avon 04/14/2006 Interchange Modification Study City of Avon 05/05/2009 Environmental (NEPA) Doc. City of Avon 09/01/2009 Detailed Design City of Avon 01/01/2011 Right of Way / Utilities City of Avon 01/01/2012 Sources of Other (Non-TRAC) Funding (If applicable) Project Phase Source Amount (PS, NEPA, DD, RW, CO) (Agency name) (In Millions) All Phases City of Avon $23,800,000 Additional Explanation of Other Funding (Insert additional rows above Additional Explanation of Other Funding as needed one row for each combination of project phase and source) Note: Totals of Other funding entered above MUST MATCH totals in project funding table below by project phase. Project Sponsor Investment Factors Creation of TIF or Other Innovative Financing Tool Percentage of Sponsoring Agency Investment (Yes or No) (%) Yes 100% Project Phase Planning Study (PS) Environmental Doc. (NEPA) Detailed Design (DD) Right of Way /Utilities (RW) Construction (CO) Fiscal Year Project Funding Other Funding Previous TRAC New TRAC Total (YYYY) (In Millions) (In Millions) (In Millions) (In Millions) 2006 $300,000 0 0 $300,000 2009 $100,000 0 0 $100,000 2011 $1,800,000 0 0 $1,800,000 2012 $4,400,000 0 0 $4,400,000 2013 $17,100,000 0 0 $17,100,000 Total $23,700,000 0 0 $23,700,000

Remarks/Comments Applicant Information Name Title Phone Number James Piazza Planning Coordinator (440) 937-7545 MPO Acknowledgement (If applicable) Name MPO Phone Number ODOT District Acknowledgement Name District Phone Number Rev. 6-10-09