COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 SONOMA COUNTY COASTAL TRAIL, PHASE I. File No Project Manager: Richard Retecki

Similar documents
COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 2, 2004 COYOTE HELLYER COUNTY PARK BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 5, 2008 GUALALA BLUFF TRAIL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation September 22, 2011 BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL: HOOD MOUNTAIN TO HIGHWAY 12

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation November 6, 2008 SAN FRANCISCO BAY TRAIL: CANAL BOULEVARD CONSTRUCTION

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 17, 2011 EAST-SLOPE SONOMA MOUNTAIN RIDGE TRAIL PLANNING

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation October 18, 2012 USAL-SHADY DELL CREEK CALIFORNIA COASTAL TRAIL PLANNING

CHAPTER 4 -- THE LAND USE PLAN: DESCRIPTIONS AND POLICIES FOR THIRTEEN PLANNING AREAS

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation May 27, 2010 SAN DIEGUITO RIVER PARK TRAILS PHASE II TRAIL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation May 27, 2010 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY MASTER COASTAL TRAIL PLAN. File No Project Manager: Laura Engeman

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 4, 2008 TIMBER COVE COASTAL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET

BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation October 21, 2010 PETALUMA TRESTLE REHABILITATION DESIGN

LAS VARAS RANCH CA COASTAL TRAIL PROPOSED ALIGNMENT

CHAPTER 4 -- THE LAND USE PLAN: DESCRIPTIONS AND POLICIES FOR THIRTEEN PLANNING AREAS

Kit Carson-Challenger Ridge Trail Project Annual Performance Report-2014 October 22, 2014

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Community Development

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

CHAPTER 4 -- THE LAND USE PLAN: DESCRIPTIONS AND POLICIES FOR THIRTEEN PLANNING AREAS

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Rural Rustic Road Program

CHAPTER 4 -- THE LAND USE PLAN: DESCRIPTIONS AND POLICIES FOR THIRTEEN PLANNING AREAS

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 13, 2007 SANTA ANA RIVER PARKWAY. File No Project Manager: Mary Small

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 8, 2016

AMENDMENT NO. 03 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF ADJALA-TOSORONTIO OAK RIDGES MORAINE CONSERVATION PLAN

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SILVER SANDS. Municipal Development Plan

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

At the time, the portion of the line through Eagle County remains wholly under the ownership of Union Pacific Railroad (UP).

Virginia Department of Transportation s Rural Rustic Road Program

Business Item No XXX. Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council approve the Coon Creek Regional Trail Master Plan.

The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired

DATE: January 19, WCA Governing Board. Johnathan Perisho, Project Manager. Mark Stanley, Executive Officer

Chapter 2: Summary of Existing Open Space System

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SONOMA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 111 SANTA ROSA AVENUE, SUITE 240, SANTA ROSA, CA (707)

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

Appendix N MAINTENANCE DREDGING STATEMENT OF NEED & PERMIT COMPLIANCE. North Thousand Islands Management Plan Appendices

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

482 :fi6 D34 --' v.i9 ~

City of Fort Lauderdale. Frequently Asked Questions. Proposed Sea Wall Ordinance

Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Docket No. CP

2016 Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Application

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 2, 2010 CITY OF SAN DIEGO NCCP PROGRAM VERNAL POOL HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN

March 2, The Honorable Mayor Williams D. Sessoms, Jr. Members of City Council. Subject: Coastal CIP Presentation to City Council - March 6, 2018

AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE CAMP FIRE DISASTER RECOVERY TEMPORARY HOUSING ORDINANCE: 4/5 VOTE REQUIRED

(No. 241) (Approved August 9, 2008) AN ACT STATEMENT OF MOTIVES

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON

Establishing a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley

Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING for the APPALACHIAN NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL in the STATE OF NEW JERSEY

MORGAN CREEK GREENWAY Final Report APPENDICES

OPEN SPACE. The Open Space Element describes the County s goals and policies with respect to open space areas and addresses the following topics:

Committee Report. Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of August 12, Business Item No.

APPENDIX A1. NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM

Executive Summary Downtown Park Fund Allocation HEARING DATE: MAY 5, 2016

Little River Trail Feasibility Study

WEKIVA WILD AND SCENIC RIVER ACT OF 2000

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project

Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)

SUMMARY REPORT ON THE SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT FOLLOW-UP OF THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OF KUWAIT

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Regional Trail Planning in San Mateo County. Active San Mateo County Conference October 15, 2013

PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM. COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 4g ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting February 9, 2016

We, Ministers, assembled in Berlin for the International Conference on Biodiversity and Tourism from 6 to 8 March 1997

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

STORNETTA BROTHERS COASTAL RANCH

Port of Friday Harbor

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

2016 Trails Maintenance and Operating Costs

Appendix A Appendix A (Project Specifications) Auk Auk / Black Diamond (Trail 44) Reroute

Pembina Valley Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Land Management Summary

COMMENT PERIOD INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Community Liaison Committee Meeting #3 July 15, :30 to 8:30 pm Flemingdon Park Library

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

2014 HOUSING ELEMENT COUNTY OF SISKIYOU

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

CHAPTER 6 NOISE EXPOSURE

Transcription:

COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 SONOMA COUNTY COASTAL TRAIL, PHASE I File No. 03-142 Project Manager: Richard Retecki RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $455,000 to the California Department of Parks and Recreation for trail planning, environmental analysis, and minor trail construction in coastal Sonoma County. LOCATION: Coastal Sonoma County (Exhibits 1 & 2) PROGRAM CATEGORY: Coastal Access EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Sonoma County in the Region Exhibit 2: Project Locations Exhibit 3: Salt Point and Fort Ross Trails Exhibit 4: Red Hill and Carrington Ranch Trails Exhibit 5: Letters of Support RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following Resolution pursuant to Sections 31400-31409 of the Public Resources Code: The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of an amount not to exceed four hundred fifty-five thousand dollars ($455,000) to the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) for trail planning, environmental analysis, and minor trail construction projects on public land for the California Coastal Trail in Sonoma County, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the disbursement of any funds, DPR shall submit for the review and approval of the Conservancy s Executive Officer a work program, budget, and schedule and the names and qualifications of contractors and subcontractors to be employed. 2. Prior to any trail construction, DPR shall submit evidence that all necessary permits and approvals have been obtained. Page 1 of 7

SONOMA COUNTY COASTAL TRAIL, PHASE I 3. In connection with trail construction, Conservancy and Proposition 12 funding shall be acknowledged by erecting and maintaining a sign or signs, the design and placement of which has been reviewed and approved by the Executive Officer. 4. DPR shall incorporate the guidelines of the Conservancy s Standards and Recommendations for Accessway Location and Development into trail planning and trail construction, as appropriate. Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal Conservancy hereby finds that: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the purposes and objectives of Chapter 9 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code, Sections 31400 et seq. 2. The proposed project is consistent with the Project Selection Criteria and Guidelines adopted by the Conservancy on January 24, 2001. PROJECT SUMMARY: This authorization will enable the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) to plan, evaluate impacts to the environment, and conduct minor trail construction projects for the Coastal Trail on public lands in Sonoma County. This is the first effort by the Conservancy and DPR to comprehensively plan for, and construct, coastal trail improvements for a single district. The project will serve as a template for other jurisdictions, agencies, and nonprofit organizations involved with the Conservancy in coastal trail implementation. The proposed authorization includes funding for both trail planning and construction. All of the work will take place in state and county park facilities Planning: The planning efforts will include three work tasks: trail layout and design, environmental impact analysis, and permitting. To conduct the trail layout and design, DPR will identify new and revised trail alignments, prepare maps, and generate construction cost estimates. Environmental analyses will address all proposed improvements to insure compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The CEQA evaluations will include all necessary seasonal surveys of sensitive plant and animal species, wetland delineations and evaluations, cultural resource evaluations, and identification of all mitigation measure necessary for construction. Numerous permits will be needed before construction on the trail segments can take place. Under the proposed grant, DPR will also prepare documentation needed to acquire all permits for implementation of selected future projects. Trail Construction: The four trail segments included in this authorization are located at Salt Point State Park, Fort Ross State Historic Park, Red Hill facility of Willow Creek State Park, and, the Carrington Ranch Trail. Salt Point State Park: The existing trail will be extended through the Gerstle Cove area, (See Exhibit 3) connecting to the trails at the south end of the park. Trail construction will be done with hand tools and a small bridge will be constructed at the site to span a seasonal coastal Page 2 of 7

SONOMA COUNTY COASTAL TRAIL, PHASE I stream. Trail construction will consist solely of ground cover clearance, removal of small tree limbs, and signing. This segment is 1.5 miles long. Fort Ross State Historic Park: trail work will connect Fort Ross Cove to the Reef Campground near the southern boundary to the park (Exhibit 3). Trail building crews will use hand tools to reconstruct the existing trail from the beach upslope to the Reef Campground at about the 120 foot elevation. Improvements for this 2,600 foot link will consist of drainage crossings, steps on steep bluff areas, trail rehabilitation and signing. Red Hill Trail: a new 1.5-mile trail will be constructed over rolling terrain to the top of Red Hill a 1,100-foot peak with spectacular coastal views park (Exhibit 4). DPR will scout the terrain for the most feasible trail route and then mark the route for trail building crews. Hand tools, weed whackers and power mowers will be used to cut the rough trail through the coastal grassland to minimize environmental impact. This trail will be accessible from the Coastal Trail and provide a future inland connector to the Coleman Valley and Willow Creek areas. Signs will be placed along the Red Hill Trail and all connecting trails. Carrington Ranch Trail: a new trail will be constructed across level ground for a distance of 2.5 miles park (Exhibit 4). As with the other three trails, all the construction for this trail will be done by DPR supervised crews using hand tools only. Besides the tract of the Coastal Trail, an existing loop trail will be rehabilitated, and two inland connectors will be constructed to the eastern property boundary. Appropriate signing will be developed and placed on the Coastal Trail and the inland connectors. This is a crucial segment that will provide connections to existing facilities and inland trail routes, as well as to the Coastal Trail on the north and south. The Conservancy and DPR, along with regional and local entities, will continue to work together to prepare a second phase of trail construction projects, designed under the planning portion of this authorization, and forward them to the Conservancy for consideration later this year. Site Description: The Sonoma county coastal margin is physically dynamic and is a major contributor to the local economy through the activities of agriculture, tourism, and recreation. The coast is rugged and there is a distinct geological break at the Russian River south to Marin County. North of the Russian River the terrain consists of steep cliffs and bluffs, numerous steep parallel stream channels, open and forested coastal terraces and slopes, unique vegetative habitats, and small pocket beaches and sea stacks. The Salt Point trail meanders the open marine terrace upslope into the forested terrace. It will slowly gain elevation from approximately 80ft. at the bluff face to connect with the inland park trail at about 320 ft above sea level. The trail will connect with three day-use areas and two campgrounds, and with other trails on the bluff. The trail at Fort Ross will skirt the edge of the bluff that is open terrain with a couple of steep gullies that provide seasonal drainage. This trail will connect two of the major recreation areas of the park. South of the Russian River the geology and landforms are very different. The coastal terrace is broad and slopes gently upward to hills that may reach above 1,200 feet, and that provide spectacular coastal views. The San Andreas fault zone passes through Bodega Bay and re-enters from the ocean at Fort Ross, where it crosses to the Gualala River valley and then in to Mendocino County. Numerous small settlements dot the landscape with the major coastal settlement being Bodega Bay, the only sheltered harbor for the county. Existing sections of the Coastal Trail, such as the Kortum Trail, are found along the bluff, on the terrace, or within dunes near Bodega Bay. Page 3 of 7

SONOMA COUNTY COASTAL TRAIL, PHASE I The Red Hill Trail will pass entirely through coastal grassland from Shell Beach gaining elevation gradually as it uses the existing trail. At approximately 500 feet elevation, a new trail alignment will take off to the southeast gaining elevation until it reaches the top of Red Hill at about 1,100 feet. This trail will not only connect with existing trails but also provide a connection for future inland trails. The Carrington Ranch Trail will traverse the coastal terrace along level terrain. The seaward portion of the property is a terrace with no major streams or creeks. Construction will take place on this terrace that is coastal grassland and seasonal wild flowers. This trail will be a segment of the Coastal Trail and will connect with two inland trail systems. Project History: As part of the national Millennium Trail Program, the California Coastal Trail was designated a Millennium Trail by the Governor of California in the year 2000. That designation brought renewed interest in the trail and began a statewide effort to complete implementation of the Coastal Trail. As part of the statewide effort, Senate Bill 908, which was passed and adopted in 2001, required the Conservancy to consult and coordinate with DPR and the Coastal Commission to complete the trail. The initial step for the Conservancy was to work with others to produce for the Legislature by January 31, 2003 a comprehensive plan for the development of the Coastal Trail. This authorization relates to the Coastal Trail Plan, the Sonoma State Beaches General Plan Update, the Conservancy s planning and project determinations for the Sonoma coast, and to local planning efforts for the Coastal Trail. The Conservancy s Coastal Trail Plan designated priority trail implementation recommendations for each coastal county. Running parallel with that planning process, were the Conservancy s plans and priorities for acquisitions, enhancement, and public access for the Sonoma coast. The implementation recommendations and the Conservancy s priorities melded to produce this project proposal that would not only enhance existing trails and construct new segments, but also assist in the process of connecting segments within facilities and connecting one facility to another. This authorization is the first that comprehensively evaluates the needs of a single jurisdiction for trail implementation, and attempts through planning, coordination and collaboration, and funding to implement major portions of the Coastal Trail. PROJECT FINANCING: Coastal Conservancy $455,000 Department of Parks and Recreation 110,000 Total Project Cost $565,000 The anticipated source of funding for the proposed grant is the Conservancy s FY 2001/02 appropriation from the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Fund (Proposition 12) designated specifically for use in the California Coastal Trail Program. The proposed project will carry out that funding purpose. CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY'S ENABLING LEGISLATION: The proposed project is undertaken pursuant to Sections 31400 et seq. of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code, which authorizes the Conservancy s involvement in development of coastal access. Page 4 of 7

SONOMA COUNTY COASTAL TRAIL, PHASE I Public Resources Code 31400 states the Legislature s intent that the Conservancy have a principal role in the implementation of a system of public accessways to and along the coast. Under the proposed project, the Conservancy s funds would allow DPR to prepare plans for Coastal Trail improvements and to prepare environmental analysis to determine the extent of impacts that new trail construction and rehabilitation would have on the natural environment. Planning efforts will provide a framework for the timely implementation of trail segment construction through cooperation of other agencies and other participants in this project. Also, consistent with this Section, funds will be used by DPR for the construction or improvement of several trail segments. Pursuant to 31400.1, the Conservancy may provide grants to public agencies to develop lands for public access purposes to and along the coast. All of the accessways to be planned, designed and constructed under the proposed project will provide public access to and along the Sonoma coast. The proposed authorization is also consistent with 31400.2 which permits the Conservancy to provide up to the total cost of the initial development of public accessways by a public agency. In determining the amount of funding, the Conservancy has considered the factors required by 31400.2, as described in more detail under the Consistency with Conservancy's Project Selection Criteria & Guidelines section below. As required by 31401, the proposed access facilities to be developed under this project, will be consistent with the Conservancy s Standards and Recommendations for Accessway Location and Development. To ensure that the design of the accessway facilities conform to these standards, as a condition of this grant, DPR will be required to incorporate the Conservancy guidelines into the design planning process, as appropriate The proposed project will carry out the mandate of 31408, which directs the Conservancy, to coordinate the development of the California Coastal Trail in consultation with the Department of Parks and Recreation and the Coastal Commission. The Conservancy has worked closely with DPR to establish priority trail segments that will result in a more continuous trail route, along with improvements that will provide safer public use. Finally, 31409 allows the Conservancy to award grants and provide assistance to public agencies to establish and expand inland trail systems that may be linked to the California Coastal Trail. The Red Hill Trail will provide an inland link to the Coleman Valley Road area, where it will be possible to connect through various easements to the DPR Ranger Station at Salmon Creek. CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY SSTRATEGIC PLAN GOAL(S) AND OB- JECTIVE(S): Consistent with Goal 1 Coastal Trail Development, Objective s A B and C the project will design, rehabilitate or construct new coastal trail segments, and provide appropriate facilities and signs for the improved trail segments. Page 5 of 7

SONOMA COUNTY COASTAL TRAIL, PHASE I CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY'S PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA & GUIDELINES: The proposed project is consistent with the Conservancy's Project Selection Criteria and Guidelines adopted January 24, 2001 in the following respects: Required Criteria 1. Promotion of the Conservancy s statutory programs and purposes: See the Consistency with Conservancy s Enabling Legislation section above. 2. Consistency with purposes of the funding source: See the Project Financing section above. 3. Support of the Public: The proposed project has a broad level of support from public agencies and officials, nonprofit organizations, coastal trail advocacy groups, and the general public. Project supporters include: Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey, State Senator Wes Chesbro, Assemblymember Patti Berg, DPR, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, Sonoma County Regional Parks, Coastwalk, LandPaths, Stewards of the Coast and Redwoods. Letters of Support are attached as Exhibit 5. 4. Location: The proposed project is located entirely within the coastal zone of Sonoma County. 5. Need: The proposed Coastal Trail project is a vital next step in the completion of the Coastal Trail for Sonoma County. The Conservancy is a crucial partner in the implementation of the trail not only for Sonoma County, but for the entire coast. Conservancy funding and collaboration are essential to move this project to completion. 6. Greater-Than-Local Interest: The California coast is renowned internationally as a tourist and recreation destination. The Sonoma coast and its existing recreational facilities will be further enhanced and more attractive as a result of the completion of the Coastal Trail. New trail access will be constructed and trail segments in need of repair will be rehabilitated to provide safe public access to and along the coast. Additional Criteria 7. Readiness: If this authorization is approved, DPR is ready to begin work on the Coastal Trail in the spring of 2004. 8. Realization of prior Conservancy goals: The project will enhance and implement the objectives of the Sonoma County Parcel Study (1999); the Russian River/North Coast Parcel Analysis (2002); the Coleman Valley Trails Study (2002); the Bodega Bay Trails Plan (2002); and, Completing the California Coastal Trail (2003). All five are previous Conservancy projects that have assisted and guided land protection and public access implementation for the Sonoma coast. 15. Cooperation: This proposed project evolved from discussions and conversations between the members of the West County/Coastal Working Group, a thorough planning and implementation analysis by State Parks, and the Conservancy s responsibility for Coastal Trail development. Page 6 of 7

SONOMA COUNTY COASTAL TRAIL, PHASE I CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM POLICIES: The project is consistent with the Sonoma County Local Coastal Program, certified in 1981 and revised on August 3, 1999, in the following respects: V. PUBLIC RECREATION Sonoma Coastal Trail Coastal trails being planned and developed by public agencies will be coordinated and linked into a State coastal trails system as part of the California Recreational Trails Plan prepared by the Department of Parks and Recreation, which will coordinate the overall trails system with local and regional agencies and organizations. The Conservancy and DPR are coordinating this effort to complete the Coastal Trail on public lands within the Sonoma coastal zone. DPR has developed a trail rehabilitation and construction plan for numerous state and local park facilities in Sonoma County. This comprehensive county coastal trail plan will simplify the project determination process and successfully implement nearly 17 miles of coastal trail. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA: To the extent that the project will involve repair, maintenance, and minor alteration or rehabilitation and reconstruction of existing trails, the proposed authorization is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under 14 Cal. Code of Regulations Section 15301, which provides for the repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of pedestrian trails where negligible or no expansion of use will occur beyond that which exists, and under 15302, which exempts reconstruction or replacement of existing trail facilities. The proposed trail improvements and construction are categorically exempt from review of environmental impacts under CEQA pursuant to 15303 as limited, new construction of small facilities. Section 15304 likewise exempts the new construction and trail improvements, because these activities will only produce minor alterations to land, water and or vegetation in the form of vegetation removal or pruning with hand tools, erosion control, vegetation plantings, stairway construction, invasive species removal, and signing,. The planning, design, and environmental analysis portions of the proposed authorization are categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA under 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15306, which provides exemptions for data collection, research, and resource evaluation activities that do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. It is also exempt under 15262, which provides an exemption for feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions not yet approved. Upon approval of the project, staff will file a Notice of Exemption. Page 7 of 7

EXHIBIT 1 Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT 2: Project Locations Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT 3: Salt Point and Fort Ross Trails Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT 4: Red Hill and Carrington Ranch Trails Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT 5: Letters of Support Page 1 of 8

EXHIBIT 5: Letters of Support Page 2 of 8

EXHIBIT 5: Letters of Support Page 3 of 8

EXHIBIT 5: Letters of Support Page 4 of 8

EXHIBIT 5: Letters of Support Page 5 of 8

EXHIBIT 5: Letters of Support Page 6 of 8

EXHIBIT 5: Letters of Support Page 7 of 8

EXHIBIT 5: Letters of Support Page 8 of 8