Federal Outdoor Recreation Trends Effects on Economic Opportunities

Similar documents
IRIS Internet Research Information Series

AMERICAN S PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION: Results From NSRE 2000 (With weighted data) (Round 1)

MT SCORP Resident Travel for Outdoor Recreation in Montana

Recreationists on the Gifford Pinchot National Forest: A Survey of User Characteristics, Behaviors, and Attitudes

System Group Meeting #1. March 2014

13.1 REGIONAL TOURISM ISSUES AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Appendix A BC Provincial Parks System Goals

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Canadian Visitors

ONTARIO TRAILS COUNCIL FAQ

State Park Visitor Survey

These expenses are mainly on gear, vehicles, trips, travel-related expenses and more.

WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes

Economic And Social Values of Vermont State Parks 2002

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

Outdoor Recreation In America 1998

Restore and implement protected status that is equivalent, or better than what was lost during the mid-1990 s

Summer 2013 Dalton Highway Recreation Study

Planning and Managing Tourism in Protected Areas

Northern Rockies District Value of Tourism Research Project December 2007

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Greater Portland & Casco Bay

Recreation Demand and Climate Trends

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Mid-Coast

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2016 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Mid-Coast. Prepared by

4.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION 4.1 PUBLIC LANDS

National Park Service Wilderness Action Plan

Non-Motorized Outdoor Recreation in British Columbia in 2012: Participation and Economic Contributions

Chapter III: Outdoor Recreation Demand in Maine.

LIST OF LOCAL SIGHTS AND RECREATION

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2016 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes & Mountains.

National Recreation Trail Application for Designation

Percentage Participation

WHAT is in YOUR Region?

NATURE-BASED OUTDOOR RECREATION

CHAPTER 5. Chapter 5 Recreation Element

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes & Mountains

FS November, 1997 OUTDOOR RECREATION TRENDS AND MARKET OPPORTUNITIES IN THE UNITED STATES

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes and Mountains

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2014 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Greater Portland & Casco Bay

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

National Recreation Trail Update Form

Outdoor Recreation by Alaskans: Projections for 2000 Through 2020

X. COMMUNITY ECONOMY

Visitor Profile - Central Island Region

A Profile of Nonresident Travelers through Missoula: Winter 1993

Outdoor Recreation Trends In Maine. Stephen Reiling and Hsiang-tai Cheng

SOCIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES.

YUKON TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY GROWING TOURISM. OUR FUTURE. OUR PATH.

2006 RENO-SPARKS VISITOR PROFILE STUDY

Wray, CO HEAL MAPPS Community Report

CANADIAN TRAVEL MARKET. Outdoor Activities While on Trips of One or More Nights. Overview Report. February 29, 2008

2014 STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN

IATOS 2003 Outdoor Enthusiast Survey CTC Market Research March, 2003

2009/10 OUTDOOR RECREATION STUDY BC RESIDENT PARTICIPATION. January 2013

Discussion Topics. But what does counting tell us? Current Trends in Natural Resource Management

Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State

The Economic Benefits of Agritourism in Missouri Farms

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2014 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes & Mountains

STONE MOUNTAIN PROVINCIAL PARK Purpose Statement and Zoning Plan

Agritourism Planning Considerations. Stacey McCullough SWREC Horticulture Field Day June 16, 2016

Tourism activity supports 60,007 full-time equivalent jobs locally

The ABC s of Nature- Based Tourism Fermata Inc. All Rights Reserved

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2016 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Highlands. Prepared by

MOUNTAINS MATTER TO MILLENNIALS WHITE PAPER

Marchand Provincial Park. Management Plan

HIGH-END ECOTOURISM AS A SUSTAINABLE LAND USE OPTION IN RURAL AFRICA:

O REGON TRAILS SUMMIT. Oregon Trails Summit. Rogue River National Forest

PROPOSED PARK ALTERNATIVES

CURRENT AND POTENTIAL USE LEVELS BY ACTIVITY.

Crystal Lake Area Trails

Tourism in numbers

OUTDOOR RECREATION OUTLOOK 2010

Planning Future Directions. For BC Parks: BC Residents' Views

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

Recreation Opportunity Analysis Authors: Mae Davenport, Ingrid Schneider, & Andrew Oftedal

Recreation. Individuals Communities Economy Environment

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2014 Calendar Year Annual Report First Time and Repeat Visitors: A Comparison

Paiute Trail Hatfield-McCoy Highwood Mountains

The Frank Church River of No Return Wilderness

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

TRAIL USER PERMIT FEE NATURAL RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT INTERIM COMMITTEE

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report First Time and Repeat Visitors: A Comparison

California Agritourism Snapshot 2017

VALUE OF TOURISM. Trends from

Cruise Industry Overview

MNRRA. Figure 1: State and Federal recreation resources available in Minnesota. Credit: Terry Brown, University of Minnesota.

State of the Industry Report. Presented by Hon. Beverly Nicholson-Doty. Chairman, Caribbean Tourism Organization. Government House.

KANANASKIS COUNTRY PROVINCIAL RECREATION AREAS MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE - November 20, 2007

The University of Georgia

10/25/2013. What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013 Statewide Public Survey Advisory Group Priority Areas Your Suggestions!

State-Level Economic Contributions of Active Outdoor Recreation Technical Report on Methods and Findings

Recreation in the Battle River Basin: Overview. John Thompson, Watrecon Consulting

The tourism value of the natural environment and outdoor activities in

Destination Management Planning

Discussion on the Influencing Factors of Hainan Rural Tourism Development

Clearwater Lake Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

2.0 PARK VISION AND ROLES

Transcription:

United States Department of Agriculture Federal Outdoor Recreation Trends Effects on Economic Opportunities The Forest Service National Center for Natural Resources Economic Research is assisting the Federal Interagency Council on Outdoor Recreation in understanding the likely impact of future recreation trends on recreation-related economic opportunities. The key findings are summarized in this document. Background Outdoor recreation holds a significant place in American lives and culture. It inspires interest in and appreciation of the natural world and contributes to the physical, mental, social, and spiritual health of individuals. Federal lands provide recreation opportunities and also generate positive economic effects for nearby communities. Visitors to federal lands often spend money in these communities, supporting local businesses that provide facilities, products, and services related to recreation. This business activity sustains jobs and incomes, broadens local tax bases, and helps diversify the economies of many rural areas. In 2012, Americans spent about $51 billion for recreation related purchases in communities near federal lands and waters managed by FICOR agencies, supporting nearly 880,000 jobs nationwide. The economic contributions of recreation to communities depend on both the volume of visitors and their trip-related spending. The type of recreation trip is the most important factor in explaining variation in visitor trip spending near federal recreation sites. Visitors traveling outside the local area of their home to recreate spend up to twice as much as visitors recreating near their homes. Visitors who take trips where they stay overnight away from home have greater spending than recreation users on day trips. The highest spending comes from visitors who travel far from home and stay overnight in communities near federal lands; they spend on average 15 times more than those on local day trips. Expenditures for lodging, food, fuel, and entertainment usually account for the majority of trip spending. A hiker in Los Padres National Forest, CA. Credit: USDA Forest Service The Federal Interagency Council on Outdoor Recreation (FICOR) is made up of the Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Forest Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Park Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Fish and Wildlife Service, whose missions or programs include providing outdoor recreation and conserving or managing natural and cultural resources. Forest Service Research & Development October 2014

USDA Forest Service Research & Development Total spending in local communities depends largely on the patterns of spending across trip types and the number of visitors within each trip type category. Gateway communities near popular federal recreation opportunities capture significant spending from large numbers of overnight visitors. Other federal lands located near metropolitan areas can support high levels of local spending from the high volume of day use, even though visitor spending per trip is low. The choice of recreation activity also influences trip spending. Downhill and cross country skiing and snowmobiling tend to generate the most spending per trip because of specialized expenses needed to participate in these activities. Conversely, some activities in primitive areas, like backpacking and backcountry hiking tend to support lower levels of visitor spending during the trip. The choice of recreation activity influences trip spending. Visitors engaged in winter recreation activities tend to generate the most spending per trip. Above Left: A cross country skier on US Fish and Wildlife Service land. Credit: US Fish and Wildlife Service Above Right: A backpacker in Olympic National Forest, WA. Credit: USDA Forest Service The range, type, and availability of federal recreation opportunities vary greatly across the United States. Federal recreation destinations that are unique or premier (i.e., crown jewels ) consistently attract large numbers of tourists who travel long distances to visit. The high levels of recreation at these sites often make tourism a primary economic driver in nearby communities. Federal recreation destinations in remote rural communities tend to have few visitors, many of whom reside in the local area. Visitor spending in these locales is often relatively low with limited economic effects. The majority of federal recreation areas are somewhere in the middle, receiving moderate levels of visitation that comprise an important component of local economic activity. Participation in most recreation activities is projected to grow through 2030. Population growth will drive increases in both recreation participation and total days of participation despite declining per capita participation rates for many activities (Figure 1). The activities projected to have the highest percentage growth in days of participation by 2030 are downhill skiing, visiting interpretive sites, hiking and birding (Figure 2). Projected percentage growth is lowest for hunting, snowmobiling, motorized off-road and fishing. These activities all show positive growth, but at rates less than the increase in population. 2

National Center for Natural Resources Economics Research Downhill skiing and motorized water use occur in unique environments and generate high levels of spending by day use visitors. Both activities are projected to see large increases in use, thereby supporting increased economic activity in nearby communities. Recreation activities that are both popular and occur widely across the spectrum of federal environments, such as hiking, viewing nature, and visiting developed sites, are expected to continue supporting economic activity in local communities. Figure 1. Projected Percentage Change in Per Capita Participation by Activity Group* 2008-2030. Downhill Skiing 6.7 Birding 4.4 Challenge Swimming Visiting Interpretive Sites Hiking Equestrian Motorized Water 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.7 2.5 Viewing Developed Site Use -0.6-2.1-2.6-3.9 1.2 0.7 Cross-Country Skiing Visiting Primitive Areas Fishing Floating -4.7 Motorized Off-Road -10.4 Snowmobiling -11.6 Hunting *Individual activities included in select groups Challenge Cross-Country Skiing Developed Site Use Downhill Skiing Floating Motorized Water Viewing Visiting Interpretive Sites Visiting Primitive Areas Mountain climbing; caving; rock climbing Cross-country skiing; snowshoeing Family gatherings; picnicking; developed camping Downhill skiing; snowboarding Canoeing; kayaking; rafting Motorboating; waterskiing; using personal watercrafts Viewing or photographing natural scenery, flowers, birds, other wildlife; gathering berries, etc. Visiting outdoor nature centers or zoos, historic sites, or prehistoric sites Backpacking; primitive camping; visiting a wilderness 3

USDA Forest Service Research & Development Climate change is likely to affect recreation participation and resource availability and quality. Overall, the effect of climate change on recreation use in 2030 was to slightly reduce total participants and the estimated days of participation for most activities relative to the projections without climate change. The effects of climate change were usually overwhelmed by increases in participation attributed to future population and income growth. Three key recreation activities showed sizeable recreation use impacts from climate change. Reductions in total days of participation occurred for snowmobiling and cross-country skiing and the growth of participation was slowed for floating. Snowmobilers and cross-country skiers have some of the highest trip expenditures among federal land recreationists. Large changes in the number of participant days for these winter activities could lead to reductions in the economic contribution to communities where they are currently popular. Climate change effects on resource availability could not be incorporated in the projections, but may have substantial impacts on recreation environments in the future. For example, increasing temperatures will likely affect the distribution of plant and animal species that maintain fish and game populations. With climate change, the number of participation days for activities such as snowmobiling is expected to drop. Credit: Thinkstock FICOR agencies manage extensive recreation resources, but those are expected to remain relatively fixed through 2030. The ability of federal resources to meet future recreation demands depends on future recreation participation rates, the distribution of recreation participants in relation to recreation resources, and substitutes for federal opportunities. With an increasing U.S. population and a stable federal land base, the per capita availability of federal recreation resources will decline. Reductions in the per capita area of federal forest and rangelands could contribute to declines in both the quantity and quality of opportunities for spatially extensive nature-based recreation activities such as hunting, motorized off-road driving, and visiting primitive areas. However, these effects will vary since the intensity of use and availability of these opportunities varies considerably across the country. Fixed capacity at popular federal recreation areas limits the capability of some federal resources to compete for expected future increases in recreation participation. Flat future visitation levels at these sites may reduce the potential for recreation-related business growth in nearby tourism dependent communities. Visitors facing limited federal recreation opportunities may find similar opportunities nearby, travel outside the local area to recreate, or visit the area at another time or season. In any case the potential exists to alter the distribution of economic effects attributed to federal resources in both time and place. 4

National Center for Natural Resources Economics Research Figure 2. Projected TotalDays DaysbybyActivity Activity Group, 2008-2030. ProjectedPercentage PercentageChange Change in Total Group, 2008-2030 Downhill Skiing 39.5 Visiting Interpretive Sites 34.1 Hiking 33.5 Birding 32.5 Swimming 31.7 Equestrian 31.7 Motorized Water 30.6 Challenge 30.5 Cross-Country Skiing 28.6 Developed Site Use 26.6 Viewing 23.9 Visiting Primitive Areas 22.6 Floating 22.1 Fishing 21.1 Motorized Off-Road Use 17.3 Snowmobiling Hunting 12.1 6.4 Federal lands offer diverse recreational opportunities in every state. Above Left: Campers on a coastal plain. Credit: US Fish and Wildlife Service Right: Hikers in the Helena National Forest, MT. Credit: Brandan W. Schulze, USDA Forest Service 5

National Center for Natural Resources Economics Research FICOR agencies can foster partnerships with local communities and businesses to promote successful tourism development. Recreation and tourism spending in local communities is enhanced by federal opportunities to attract visitors, business infrastructure to cater to the needs of recreation users, and visitors willing to spend money. Federal recreation managers must understand their niche across the spectrum of recreation opportunities and be realistic in evaluating the potential of future recreation participation to deliver economic activity to local communities. Communities can strengthen opportunities for tourism spending by encouraging business development that offers facilities, products, and services preferred by visitors attracted to nearby federal recreation opportunities. Children kayaking. Credit: Bureau of Reclamation Recreation providers must also be aware of changing recreation preferences resulting from changing U.S. demographic trends and consider the effects on the number of visitors, preferred activities, and spending patterns. Climate change will affect recreation opportunities in the future further exploration of the direct and indirect relationships among climate, recreation resources, and recreation participation will be fundamental to improving projections of recreation participation and visitor spending in the future. Economics in Action The National Center for Natural Resources Economic Research (NCNRER) is a Forest Service Research and Development virtual center designed to respond to emerging natural resource economic issues of national significance. Forest Service Research and Development works at the forefront of science to improve the health and use of our Nation s forests and grasslands. Today, more than 500 Forest Service researchers work in all 50 states, U.S. territories, and commonwealths. Their research findings inform policy and land-management decisions and are available for public use and benefit. The findings in this document are based on NCNRER Working Paper Number 1. Federal Outdoor Recreation Trends: Effects on Economic Opportunities Eric M. White, J. M. Bowker, Ashley E. Askew, Linda L. Langner, J. Ross Arnold, and Donald B.K. English. For more information on NCNRER please contact: Carl F. Lucero Director, Landscape Restoration & Ecosystem Services Research carlflucero@fs.fed.us 6