Subject : Correct application of the strategic lateral offset procedures

Similar documents
Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

EUR/NAT States of accreditation, EANPG Regular participants

When replying please quote : EUR/NAT TEC (KOV/LEJ) 16 March 2012

SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR IN-FLIGHT CONTINGENCIES IN OCEANIC AIRSPACE OF SEYCHELLES FIR

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist is available at & NAT Documents, NAT Documents, then NAT Ops Bulletins.

GENERAL REPORT. Reduced Lateral Separation Minima RLatSM Phase 2. RLatSM Phase 3

This Bulletin may be updated, as necessary, as progress is made toward the start date for Phase 2b of the NAT DLM.

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 33/17

Pilot RVSM Training Guidance Material

North Atlantic Initiatives

Consider problems and make specific recommendations concerning the provision of ATS/AIS/SAR in the Asia Pacific Region LOST COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES

LARGE HEIGHT DEVIATION ANALYSIS FOR THE WESTERN ATLANTIC ROUTE SYSTEM (WATRS) AIRSPACE CALENDAR YEAR 2016

SERVICE DEVELOPMENT ROADMAP

NOTE TO MEMBERS #24 22 MAR 2017

RLatSM. Reduced Lateral Separation Trial. FAQs. 4 September 15

CAR Section II Series I Part VIII is proposed to be amended. The proposed amendments are shown in subsequent affect paragraphs.

APPLICATION OF SEPARATION MINIMA NORTH ATLANTIC REGION

When replying please quote Reference : EUR/NAT TEC (FIC/SAN) 5/4/ May 2015

Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional. Международная организация гражданской авиации

Please accept, Sir/Madam, the assurances of my highest consideration.

Note: Grey shading indicates modifications or additions to NAT OPS Bulletin 2015_003 Rev 45 text.

When Plans Don t Go as Planned

23 July To: IFATCA Member Associations. Dear colleagues

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist is available at EUR & NAT Documents, NAT Documents, then NAT Ops Bulletins.

NAT RLATSM PHASE 2 UPDATE - GUIDANCE FOR U.S

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

WEST ATLANTIC ROUTE SYSTEM (WATRS) PLUS AIRSPACE REDESIGN AND SEPARATION REDUCTION INITIATIVE. (Presented by United States of America) SUMMARY

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

Implementation of Strategic Lateral Offset Procedures

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 7 AEROPLANE COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

Application Form and Compliance Checklist - OPS for NAT HLA (MNPS) Approval FORM Operator:

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

Flight Operations Inspector Manual

OCEANIC REQUIRED NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE (Including RNP-10 and RNP-4)

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

Date: 01 Jun 2018 Time: 0959Z Position: 5121N 00048W Location: 6nm N Farnborough

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

Contents. Subpart A General 91.1 Purpose... 7

Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional. Международная организация гражданской авиации. Ref.: AN 13/2.5-13/85 13 December 2013

Performance Based Communication and Surveillance in the ICAO North Atlantic Region. PBCS in NAT HLA

GEN 3. SERVICES GEN AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist, available at (Documents, NAT Docs), contains an up to date list of all current NAT Ops Bulletins.

This page intentionally left blank.

Amendment to ICAO SUPPs - Doc (Presented by the Secretariat) Summary

Aerodrome Obstacle Survey Information Checks

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

NBAA IOC Oceanic Operations

The purpose of North Atlantic Operations Bulletin is to distribute the new issue of the Oceanic Errors Safety Bulletin (OESB).

NOVEMBER 2014 UPDATE NAT ATS SURVELLANCE AIRSPACE PHASE 2 OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC REGIONAL DATA LINK MANDATE

COLLISION AVOIDANCE FOR RPAS

SAFETYSENSE LEAFLET AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES OUTSIDE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION FIRST MEETING OF DIRECTORS OF CIVIL AVIATION OF THE CARIBBEAN REGION (CAR/DCA/1)

SUMMARY. of the North. Reference: A B

AFI REGIONAL MONITORING AGENCY (ARMA) ARMA forms for use in obtaining information from a State authorities and/or Service Providers

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION WESTERN AND CENTRAL AFRICA OFFICE. Thirteenth Meeting of the FANS I/A Interoperability Team (SAT/FIT/13)

This NAT OPS Bulletin supersedes NAT OPS Bulletin, Serial Number: Summary of Changes

Briefing Leaflet. Recommended Procedures in the AFI Region 1. EXCERPT FROM THE IATA IN-FLIGHT BROADCAST PROCEDURE (IFBP): 17ATSBL07 07 July 2017

Ref.: AN 4/ /27 15 April 2015

Chapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1

Manual on Monitoring the Application of Performance-based Horizontal Separation Minima

Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional. Международная организация гражданской авиации

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Consolidated Reporting Responsibilities Handbook

4.1 This document outlines when a proposal for a SID Truncation may be submitted and details the submission requirements.

AIR NAVIGATION COMMISSION

AFI REGIONAL MONITORING AGENCY (ARMA) ARMA forms for use in obtaining information from a State authorities and/or Service Providers

SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS

Review of the designation of Class C controlled airspace in the Mount Cook area - Consultation November 2013

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 11

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

Learning Objectives. By the end of this presentation you should understand:

SECTION 2 INTERNATIONAL OCEANIC AIRSPACE NOTICES

Gestão de Tráfego Aéreo 2015/2016 Exam Name Student ID Number. I (5.5/20, 0.5 each)

Dave Allanby GM Operations SOUTH AFRICAN EXPRESS

Letter of Agreement (LOA)

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

Annex III to ED Decision 2017/023/R. AMC and GM to Part-CAT Issue 2, Amendment 13

Organización de Aviación Civil Internacional. Международная организация гражданской авиации. Ref.: AN 7/ /28 13 April 2018

Safety Brief. 21st March Operations in Somali Airspace

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A00Q0116 RISK OF COLLISION

GENERAL INFORMATION Aircraft #1 Aircraft #2

WATRS PLUS ROUTE STRUCTURE REDESIGN & SEPARATION REDUCTION OPERATIONAL POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Legal regulations in transport policy

North Atlantic Central Monitoring Agency David Nicholas 16 th May 2016

EASA NPA on SERA Part ENAV Response sheet. GENERAL COMMENTS ON NPA PACKAGE Note: Specific comments are provided after the General Comments

Ref.: AN 11/19-02/82 30 August 2002

LIST OF ACRONYMS USED IN RVSM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON D.C. GRANT OF EXEMPTION

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group. 31 May Policy Statement STANDARD INSTRUMENT DEPARTURE TRUNCATION POLICY.

PBN Operational Approval Oceanic and Remote En Route Navigation Specifications

REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

International Civil Aviation Organization. PBN Airspace Concept. Victor Hernandez

FINAL REPORT BOEING B777, REGISTRATION 9V-SWH LOSS OF SEPARATION EVENT 3 JULY 2014

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist, available at (Documents, NAT Docs), contains an up to date list of all current NAT Ops Bulletins.

Controller Training Case Study Implementation of new RNP AR APCH for RWY07 (North Circuit) at HKIA

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. Between. and RELATING TO

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION European and North Atlantic Office ORGANIZACIÓN DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL INTERNACIONAL Oficina Europa y Atlántico Norte ORGANISATION DE L'AVIATION CIVILE INTERNATIONALE Bureau Europe et Atlantique Nord МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ГРАЖДАНСКОЙ АВИАЦИИ Европейское/Североатлантическое бюро 3 bis villa Emile Bergerat, 92522 Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex, France Reference : T 13/3 05-0099.ATM 10 February 2005 Subject : Correct application of the strategic lateral offset procedures Action required : As indicated in paragraph 3 Sir/Madam, 1. I have the honour to refer to the Secretary General's letter AN 13/11.6-04/85 of 27 August 2004 and to the proposal for amendment to the NAT Regional Supplementary Procedures Serial Number S 01/36 NAT RAC/14, which was approved by the President on behalf of the Council on 20 November 2003. A copy of the approved proposal for amendment and of the Aeronautical Information Circular (AIC) are enclosed for ease of reference. All NAT Region provider States implemented the procedure on 10 June 2004. 2. The North Atlantic Systems Planning Group (NAT SPG), in its effort to reduce the risk in the NAT Region, had agreed that the implementation of the strategic lateral offset procedure was required. However, an initial analysis of the use of strategic lateral offsets has shown that few flight crews have been applying the procedure and the expected risk reduction has not been achieved. It was determined that this was probably because many flight crews had not been made aware of the procedure or the benefit of applying the procedure. 3. A pre-requisite for future reductions in separation minima and therefore increased efficiencies, is that all risk reduction procedures be correctly implemented. I would therefore urge you to remind all NAT airspace users of the importance of applying the offset procedure as detailed in the attached proposal for amendment. Please accept the assurances of my highest consideration. Karsten Theil ICAO Regional Director Europe and North Atlantic Enclosure Distribution: NAT Provider and User States and international organizations concerned National 01 46 41 85 85 National 01 46 41 85 00 E-mail: icaoeurnat@paris.icao.int SITA: PAREUYA Tel.: International +33 1 46 41 85 85 Fax: International +33 1 46 41 85 00 Web: http://www.icao.int AFTN: LFPSYAYU

Attachment to T 13/3 05-0099.ATM European and North Atlantic Office PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF THE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENTARY PROCEDURES, NAT REGION (Doc 7030/4) (Serial No.: EUR/NAT-S 01/36 NAT RAC/14) a) Regional Supplementary Procedures: b) Proposed by: Doc 7030/4 - NAT, Part 1 Rules of the Air, Air Traffic Services and Search and Rescue, incorporating Amendment No. 207 The United States of America. c) Proposed amendment: 1. Amend Section 7.3 Special contingency procedures for subsonic aircraft as follows: "7.3.2.1 If unable to obtain prior air traffic control clearance, the aircraft should leave its assigned route or track by initially turning 90 degrees to the right or left to acquire an offset track of 56 km (30 NM). The direction of the turn should, where possible, be determined by the position of the aircraft relative to any organized route or track system (e.g. whether the aircraft is outside, at the edge of, or within the organized track system (OTS)). Other factors, which may affect the direction of the turn, are the location of an alternate airport, terrain clearance, any lateral offset being flown and levels allocated on adjacent routes or tracks.... 7.3.3.2 An aircraft that is unable to maintain its assigned flight level should: a) initially minimize its descent rate to the extent possible; b) take account of other aircraft possibly being laterally offset from its track; bc) select a flight level which differs from those normally used by 300 m (1 000 ft) if above FL 410 or by 150 m (500 ft) if below FL 410; cd) if it is a random track aircraft operating in MNPS airspace and its distance is less than 110 km (60 NM) from any organized track, establish and maintain a 56 km (30 NM) offset track from any OTS track prior to initiating descent if the aircraft is able to do so; and de) contact ATC as soon as practicable and request a revised ATC clearance." 2. Replace in entirety the wording contained in paragraph 7.5 Special procedures to mitigate wake turbulence encounters in the NAT Region as follows:

A 2 Insert new text as follows: 7.5 Special procedures for lateral offsets within NAT airspace Note. The following incorporates lateral offset procedures for both the mitigation of the increasing lateral overlap probability and wake turbulence encounters. 7.5.1 It has been determined that allowing aircraft conducting oceanic flight to fly lateral offsets, not to exceed 2 NM right of centreline, will provide an additional safety margin and mitigate the risk of conflict when non-normal events such as aircraft navigation errors, altitude deviation errors and turbulence induced altitude-keeping errors occur. 7.5.2 This procedure provides for offsets within the following guidelines. Along a route or track there will be three positions that an aircraft may fly: centreline or one or two miles right. Offsets will not exceed 2 NM right of centreline. The intent of this procedure is to reduce risk (add safety margin) by distributing aircraft laterally across the three available positions. a) Aircraft without automatic offset programming capability must fly the centreline. b) Operators capable of programming automatic offsets may fly the centreline or offset one or two nautical miles right of centreline to obtain lateral spacing from nearby aircraft. (Offsets will not exceed 2 NM right of centreline). An aircraft overtaking another aircraft should offset within the confines of this procedure, if capable, so as to create the least amount of wake turbulence for the aircraft being overtaken. c) Pilots should use whatever means is available to determine the best flight path to fly. d) Pilots should also fly one of the three positions shown above to avoid wake turbulence. Aircraft should not offset to the left of centreline nor offset more than 2 NM right of centreline. Pilots may contact other aircraft on frequency 123.45, as necessary, to coordinate the best wake turbulence offset option. Note. It is recognized that the pilot will use his/her judgement to determine the action most appropriate to any given situation and has the final authority and responsibility for the safe operations of the aeroplane. e) Pilots may apply an offset outbound at the oceanic entry point and must return to centreline at the oceanic exit point. f) Aircraft transiting oceanic radar areas may remain on their established offset positions. g) There is no ATC clearance required for this procedure and it is not necessary that ATC be advised. End of new text

A 3 AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR Application of strategic lateral offsets in North Atlantic Region airspace 1. Introduction 1.1 During recent years, the introduction of very accurate aircraft navigation systems, along with sophisticated flight management systems, has drastically reduced the number of risk bearing lateral navigation errors reported in North Atlantic (NAT) airspace. Paradoxically, the propensity of aircraft to navigate to such a high level of accuracy has led to a situation where aircraft on the same track but at different levels, are increasingly likely to be in horizontal overlap. The effect of this is to increase the risk of collision in the event that, for whatever reason, an aircraft departs from its cleared level. 1.2 It must be stressed that the current estimated risk of a mid-air collision in NAT airspace is at an all time low, and is exhibiting a downward trend. However, NAT Service Providers have a responsibility to their customers to continually assess the level of risk in the NAT and make modifications to system operation to ensure the highest possible level of safety. Accordingly, following a successful trial in the West Atlantic Route System (WATRS), it has been determined that by allowing aircraft conducting oceanic flights to fly lateral offsets not exceeding 2 NM right of centreline, an additional safety margin will be provided and will mitigate the risk of collision when non-normal events such as operational altitude deviation errors and turbulence induced altitude deviations occur. 2. The strategic lateral offset procedure 2.1 The procedure provides for the application of lateral offsets within the following guidelines: a) strategic lateral offsets and those executed to avoid wake turbulence are to be made to the right of a route or track; b) in relation to a route or track, there are three positions that an aircraft may fly: centreline, one or 2 NM right; and, c) offsets are not to exceed 2 NM right of centreline. 2.2 The intent of this procedure is to reduce risk (increase the safety margin) by distributing aircraft laterally and equally across the three available positions. In this connection, pilots must take account of the following: a. aircraft without automatic offset programming capability must fly the centreline; b. aircraft capable of being programmed with automatic offsets may fly the centreline or offset one or 2 NM right of centreline to obtain lateral spacing from nearby aircraft; c. pilots should use whatever means are available (e.g. TCAS, communications, visual acquisition, GPWS) to determine the best flight path to fly; d. any aircraft overtaking another aircraft is to offset within the confines of this procedure, if capable, so as to create the least amount of wake turbulence for the aircraft being overtaken; e. for wake turbulence purposes, pilots are also to fly one of the three positions at 2.2b above and never offset to the left of centreline nor offset more than 2 NM right of centreline; Note. It is recognized that the pilot will use his/her judgement to determine the action most appropriate to any given situation and has the final authority and responsibility for the safe operation of the aeroplane. The use of air-to-air channel, 123.45, may be used to co-ordinate the best wake turbulence offset option.

A 4 f. pilots may apply an offset outbound at the oceanic entry point but must return to centreline at the oceanic exit point; g. aircraft transiting radar-controlled airspace e.g. Bermuda, are to remain on their established offset positions; h. there is no ATC clearance required for this procedure and it is not necessary that ATC be advised; and, j. position reports are to be based on the current ATC clearance and not the exact co-ordinates of the offset position. An example of a report when passing 54N 020W while being offset from track is Shanwick, Austrian 73, position 54N 020W, 1222, estimate etc. END