Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

Similar documents
Board of Directors Information Summary

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

SUB-REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Scorecard Key Performance Indicators

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

PTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

ATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

Sound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Bus Operations Report

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Transport Indicators Report June 2018

Operational Performance

* Data for prior months has been updated to reflect error corrections from missing passenger count data

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

December 2018 Monthly Performance Report

January 2019 Monthly Performance Report

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

MERRIMACK VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MVRTA) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE

Transit System Performance Update

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

Sound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

RTA ScoreCard December 2009

MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2017

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

With the completion of this project, we would like to follow-up on the projections as well as highlight a few other items:

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager

Auckland Transport Quarterly Indicators Report 2018/19

Bristol Virginia Transit

Sound Transit Operations January 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017

Sound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

Administrative Operations Report

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT

Board Box. February Item # Item Staff Page 1. Key Performance Indicators M. Thompson Financial Report for Dec H.

VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office

Proposition E: Municipal Transportation Quality Review

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

Service Performance 2013 Networked Family of Services

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

Sound Transit Operations February 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

FY Year End Performance Report

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

MONTHLY REPORT AUGUST 2017

Thanksgiving Holiday Period Traffic Fatality Estimate, 2017

Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation December 2004

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

95 Express Monthly Operations Report May 2017

1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL

Performance Measurement:

Annual Route Report Operating Data. Prepared for: Board of Directors. Final 4/26/2018

PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager

FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018

Hotel. Price Index. November Released Date: January Hotel Price Index

RTD s Performance Management System

Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report. 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary's Office

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

Service Performance 2010 Networked Family of Services

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

MAKING PERFORMANCE MEASURES MATTER

METROLIFT RESOURCE NOTEBOOK

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

Service Performance 2012 Networked Family of Services

Implementation Guidelines and Performance Measures Special Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities (Paratransit) Program

95 Express Monthly Operations Report July 2017

YRT/VIVA PROPOSED FARE INCREASE

Maximum Levels of Airport Charges

Compustat. Data Navigator. White Paper: Airline Industry-Specifi c

Transcription:

Transit Performance Report FY 2006-2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) J ANUARY 2008

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) Transit Performance Report I SSUED: JANUARY 2008 The Transit Performance Report (TPR) is prepared and updated annually by Valley Metro Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA). This report is developed using input from, and reviewed by, member agencies and the RPTA Board. The TPR serves as input to Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) updates. In 2006 RPTA hired a consultant to conduct a Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study (SEES). One task of this study was to develop a series of performance measures. Transit service in the region is made possible and supported by many funding sources including local city taxes in many cases. The SEES performance measures support the auditing requirements of Proposition 400 legislation. Proposition 400 authorizes a half-cent sales tax approved by voters in 2004 that goes toward freeway, street, transit and light rail improvements. In addition, the SEES developed initial performance targets that will allow comparison between performance expectations and actual performance. These performance measures and performance targets have been incorporated into the TPR. In future years these targets will be reviewed, refined and indexed to inflation as appropriate. The 2007 TPR continues to transition between the previous Performance Management Analysis System (PMAS) format and the new TPR and is based on the findings from the SEES and the data available at the time. In the future, the TPR will serve as a report card indicating the performance of each mode and service category at the system and route level as defined in the SEES. Modes covered by future TPRs will include fi xed route, paratransit, vanpool, and light rail. This report reflects data as reported to RPTA by member agencies. In fiscal year 2006-07 (July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007), there were many changes affecting data collection and reporting. Some of these changes include service providers transitioning to new fareboxes and light rail construction along major transit routes. Also as part of transitioning towards a new TPR, data definitions and measurements have changed from previous reporting years. Table of Contents DEFINITIONS... 3 FIXED ROUTE BUS... 4 PARATRANSIT... 8 VANPOOL... 12 SYSTEM SUMMARY... 15 2

Definitions Average Fare: Average fare is the average price a person pays for a transit trip. It is equal to total fare revenue collected divided by total boardings. Boarding: A boarding is known as an unlinked passenger trip. Every time a person boards a vehicle it is counted as a boarding. For example, if a person makes a trip involving one transfer, this trip is counted as two boardings. Consumer Price Index (CPI): This index is used to measure changes in prices from one period to another. The CPI is frequently used to adjust base payments to reflect changes in prices. In this Report, the CPI for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) which is averaged for all U.S. Cities, not adjusted for seasonal changes, for transportation items with a base period of 1982-1984=100 was used. The average annual index for FY 2005-06 and FY 2006-07 were calculated using the average monthly index from each fiscal year. The change from the average FY 2005-06 index to FY 2006-07 index is 0.79 percent. Farebox Recovery Ratio: This is the percentage of total operating cost that is covered by fares collected. It is equal to total fare revenue collected divided by total operating costs. Mechanical Failures: Mechanical failure is a failure of some mechanical element of the revenue vehicle that prevents the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip or from starting the next scheduled revenue trip. In addition, mechanical failures include failures from mechanical element of the revenue vehicle, because of local agency policy, prevents the vehicle from completing a scheduled revenue trip or starting the next revenue trip even though the vehicle is physically able to continue in revenue service. Net Vanpool Starts: Calculated by subtracting number of deleted vanpools from the number of new vanpools started. Operating Cost: The total cost to operate and maintain a transit system including labor, fuel, and maintenance, 3 and administration. TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) Revenue Hour: A revenue hour is an hour that one vehicle in revenue service is available to pick up revenue passengers. If ten vehicles are in service for two hours each, they collectively perform twenty revenue hours of service. Revenue Mile: A revenue mile is a mile traveled by one vehicle in revenue service that is available to pick up revenue passengers. If ten vehicles are in service for two miles each, they collectively perform twenty revenue miles of service. Revenue Service: Revenue service occurs when a vehicle is available to the general public and there is an expectation of carrying passengers who pay the required fare. Vehicles operated in fare-free service are also considered in revenue service. Revenue service includes layover/ recovery time, but does not include deadhead (i.e. travel from garage to the start point of a route), or vehicle maintenance testing. Safety Incident: Safety incidents only include major safety incidents that involve a transit vehicle or occur on transit-controlled property. Some conditions that apply to a major indecent involve property damage equal or exceeding $25,000, fatality or major injuries for two or more people. Security Incident: Security incidents are crimes (e.g. injuries or deaths resulting from assaults, arson, homicide) and the consequences of security incidents. Security incidents only include major incidents which involve a fatality, two or more injures or property damage over $25,000. Subsidy per Boarding: Also known as net operating cost per boarding, this is the operating cost per boarding minus the fare revenue per boarding. This number indicates the amount of public funding that is used to make up the difference between the cost of providing transportation service and the revenue generated by this service on a per boarding basis.

FIXED ROUTE BUS (SYSTEM-WIDE) Includes local, Express/BRT, shuttle/circulator and rural routes.

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) FIXED ROUTE BUS (SYSTEM-WIDE) The service categories and modes being measured in this interim report, and their accompanying criteria, are as follows: Subject Target Source of Target COST EFFICIENCY/EFFECTIVENESS Farebox Recovery Ratio 25% Regional Fare Policy recommendation approved by Board on September 20, 2007. Operating Cost per Boarding $2.34 Baseline from FY05-06 Fixed Route average* Subsidy per Boarding $1.76 Baseline from FY05-06 Fixed Route average* Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $5.00 Baseline from FY05-06 Fixed Route average* Average Fare $0.68 Five year timeframe starting in FY08* SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS Annual Increase in Total Boardings 3% Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study - Board approved Annual Increase in Boardings, Weekday, Saturday, Sunday 3% Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study - Board approved Avg. Boardings per Revenue Mile 2.1 Baseline from FY05-06 Fixed Route average* Detailed data supporting the charts on the following pages is available from the RPTA upon request. *Infl ated based on Consumer Price Index (CPI). 5

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) FIXED ROUTE BUS PERFORMANCE RESULTS (SYSTEM-WIDE) COST EFFICIENCY/EFFECTIVENESS Farebox Recovery Ratio Operating Cost per Boarding Target $2.34 25.87% 23.67% 24.24% Target 25% $2.23 $2.29 $2.62 The percentage of operating cost covered by fare revenue increased slightly from FY 2005-06. Fare revenue increased faster than operating cost in part because newer service continues to mature and schedules and routes were adjusted. Operating cost increased while boardings decreased slightly. Rising fuel costs and labor contributed to the increase in operating cost. Subsidy per Boarding Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $1.65 $1.75 $1.99 Target $1.76 $6.00 $4.71 $4.90 $5.28 Target $5.00 The net operating cost per boarding increased from last year and exceeds the target. Operating cost per revenue mile increased from last year and exceeds the target. Average Fare Target $0.68 $0.58 $0.54 $0.64 * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefit of Proposition 400 funds. Fare revenue increased by $0.10 per boarding but fell slightly short of the target. 6

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) FIXED ROUTE BUS PERFORMANCE RESULTS (SYSTEM-WIDE) SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS Total Fixed Route Boardings (Includes shuttles/circulators) 59,070,596 Annual Increase/Decrease in Total Boardings Annual Increase/Decrease in Weekday Boardings 58,858,166 58,184,595 Target 3% Target 3% This includes local, express/brt, shuttle/circulator, and rural routes. - -1.14% Boardings decreased slightly from FY 2005-06. - - -1.88% The previous report measured total weekday boardings. Boardings on a typical weekday decreased slightly from the previous year. Annual Increase/Decrease in Saturday Boardings Annual Increase/Decrease in Sunday Boardings Boardings per Revenue Mile 2.12 2.15 2.01 Target 2.1 Target 3% Target 3% -2.66% The previous report measured total Saturday boardings. Boardings on a typical Saturday decreased from the previous year. - - -1.05% The previous report measured total Sunday boardings. Boardings on a typical Sunday decreased slightly from the previous year. Boardings per Revenue Mile decreased slightly. * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefit of Proposition 400 funds. 7

PARATRANSIT

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) PARATRANSIT The service categories and modes being measured in this interim report, and their accompanying criteria, are as follows: Subject Target Source of Target COST EFFICIENCY/EFFECTIVENESS Farebox Recovery Ratio 5% Baseline from FY05-06 Dial-a-Ride system average* Operating Cost per Boarding $28.78 Baseline from FY05-06 Dial-a-Ride system average* Subsidy per Boarding $27.37 Baseline from FY05-06 Dial-a-Ride system average* Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $50.70 Baseline from FY05-06 Dial-a-Ride system average* SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS Annual Increase in Total Boardings 3% Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study Boardings per Revenue Hour 1.76 Baseline from FY05-06 PMAS Dial-a-Ride system average* ADA On-time Performance 90% Service Efficiency and Effectiveness Study Detailed data supporting the charts on the following pages is available from the RPTA upon request. *Infl ated based on Consumer Price Index (CPI). 9

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) PARATRANSIT PERFORMANCE RESULTS COST EFFICIENCY/EFFECTIVENESS Farebox Recovery Ratio 4.81% Target 4.41% Operating Cost per Boarding $31.97 Target $28.78 This ratio decreased slightly from the previous year and still is below the target. Operating costs increased while boardings decreased. Subsidy per Boarding Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $30.56 Target $27.37 $55.46 Target $50.70 The net operating cost to transport each passenger increased from the previous year. The operating cost per revenue hour increased slightly from the previous year and was above the target. * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefi t of Proposition 400 funds. 10

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) PARATRANSIT PERFORMANCE RESULTS SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS Annual Increase/Decrease in Total Boardings Boardings per Revenue Hour 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 1.73 Target 1.76 0% -1% -1.71% -2% Boardings per revenue hour decreased slightly and was slightly below the target Total boardings decreased by almost two percent. ADA On-Time Performance 93.5% 89.8% 95.39% The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 is federal law which prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities in many areas, including public transportation. On-time performance measures how many ADA boardings occurred within 30 minutes of the pick-up time given to the passenger at the time of their reservation. Performance exceeded the target by over 5 percent. * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefi t of Proposition 400 funds. 11

VANPOOL

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) VANPOOL The service categories and modes being measured in this interim report, and their accompanying criteria, are as follows: Subject Target Source of Target COST EFFICIENCY/EFFECTIVENESS Farebox Recovery Ratio 100% Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Operating Cost per Boarding $1.71 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Subsidy per Boarding $0 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $0.46 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Average Fare $1.85 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS Boardings per Revenue Mile.27 Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Annual Increase in Total Boardings 0% Baseline from fiscal year 05-06 PMAS Vanpool average* Number of new Vanpools started 24 2003 Regional Transportation Plan Detailed data supporting the charts on the following pages is available from the RPTA upon request. *Infl ated based on Consumer Price Index (CPI). 13

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) VANPOOL PERFORMANCE RESULTS COST EFFICIENCY/EFFECTIVENESS Farebox Recovery Ratio Operating Cost per Boarding 116.00% 114.00% 112.00% 115% $1.72 $1.70 $1.68 $1.70 Target $1.71 110.00% $1.66 108.00% 106.00% 104.00% 105.25% 107.89% $1.64 $1.62 $1.60 $1.66 $1.63 102.00% 100.00% Target 100% $1.58 Farebox recovery ratio increased from the previous year. That is, fare revenue exceeded operating cost at a greater percentage. Operating cost per boarding decreased compared to last reporting year and is below the target. Subsidy per Boarding Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $0.30 $0.20 $0.10 $0.00 Target $0.00 -$0.10 -$0.20 -$0.30-0.09-0.13-0.24 $0.44 $0.46 $0.44 Target $0.46 Subsidy per boarding continues to decrease. This means that fare revenue exceeded operating cost. Operating cost per revenue mile decreased from the previous year and was below the target. Total Vanpool Boardings Net Vanpool Starts 1.5 million 1,418,466 1.4 million 1.3 million 1,270,416 1.2 million 1.1 million 1,025,136 1.0 million Vanpool boardings continued to increase 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 26 60 19 Target 24 Fewer vanpools started than in the previous year and didn t make the target number. In FY 2006, a Start a vanpool and get one month free promotion was held. * FY 2005 was the last full year operated without the benefi t of Proposition 400 funds. 14

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE P REPORT R RT FY 2006 06 2007 (JUNE J 30, 2007) SYSTEM SUMMARY Performance Indicator Fixed Route Paratransit Vanpool System Total Farebox Recovery 24.24% 4.41% 115% 22.20% Operating Cost per Boarding $2.62 $31.97 $1.63 $3.05 Subsidy per Boarding $1.998 $30.56 -$0.24 $2.37 Operating Cost per Revenue Mile $5.28 $0.44 $5.40 Average Fare $0.64 $1.41 $1.87 $0.68 Total Boardings 58,184,595 922,790 1,418,466 60,525,851 Boardings per Revenue Mile 2.01 0.27 1.77 For questions or detailed data supporting this document, please call (602) 262-7433 and request the Transit Performance Report Support data. 15