Similarities and Differences of Travel and Tourism in Poland and Finland a Quantitative Approach

Similar documents
Comparative Approach of Romania-Croatia in Terms of Touristic Services

Sustain Aviation Growth Under Air Transport Economic Regulations

Ajankohtaista markkinoilta

The Economic Impact Of Luxembourg Airport 29 April 2016

ANNUAL TOURISM REPORTING - DATA SHEETS COUNTRY: The statistical data provided in the tables below shall cover the year 2014 and, if available, 2015.

TRAVEL & TOURISM S ECONOMIC IMPACT

Song Rui Tourism Research Center, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences March 7, 2018, Berlin

Mexico. How does Travel & Tourism compare to other sectors? GDP. Size. Share. Mexico GDP Impact by Industry. Mexico GDP Impact by Industry

China 17% Foreign overnight stays 31% Domestic overnight stays 69% 8.3 MILLION FOREIGN VISITORS IN FINLAND IN 2017

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in Colombia

United Kingdom. How does Travel & Tourism compare to other sectors? GDP. Size. Share. UK GDP Impact by Industry. UK GDP Impact by Industry

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in Australia

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

Estonia. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

The contribution of Tourism to the Greek economy in 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Japan 3% Foreign overnight stays 31% Domestic overnight stays 69% 8.3 MILLION FOREIGN VISITORS IN FINLAND IN 2017

Paul Steele, Executive Director Air Transport Symposium

The economic impact of ATC strikes in Europe Key findings from our updated report for A4E

The Economic Impact of Emirates in the United States. Prepared by:

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

The Economic Impacts of the Open Skies Initiative: Past and Future

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Foregone Economic Benefits from Airport Capacity Constraints in EU 28 in 2035

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County. July 2017

The tourism value of the natural environment and outdoor activities in

America 6% Russia 12%

Connectivity for Urban Tourism Competitiveness

FUNDACIÓN BIT PARCBIT

Tourist satellite account for Poland for the years 2005 simplified version

Korea. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at:

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

Russia 12% Russia 24% Foreign overnight stays 31% Domestic overnight stays 69% 8.3 MILLION FOREIGN VISITORS IN FINLAND IN 2017

YUKON TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY GROWING TOURISM. OUR FUTURE. OUR PATH.

Foreign overnight stays 31% Domestic overnight stays 69% 8.3 MILLION FOREIGN VISITORS IN FINLAND IN 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

- Online Travel Agent Focus -

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013

Costa Rica. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding. Tourism policies and programmes

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Civil Aviation Sector as a Driver for Economic Growth in Egypt

North American Online Travel Report

JUNE 2016 GLOBAL SUMMARY

Economic impact of the Athens International Airport

by Dr. Valia Kasimati Bank of Greece

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in United Arab Emirates

Israel. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Sweden. Swedish Visitors in Finland Statistical Trends and Profile

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Japan

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, June 2018

Poland. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in Belarus - assessment from an economic perspective

Analysis of Interaction between Air Transportation and Economic Activity

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Ireland

THE 2006 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL & TOURISM IN INDIANA

Spain. Spanish Visitors in Finland Statistical Trends and Profile

Benchmarking Travel & Tourism in Russia

Results of Tourism Activity Mexico, March 2017

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

The Impact of Brexit on Tourism

Netherlands. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2010

Norway MARKET REVIEW Norwegian Visitors in Finland Statistical Trends and Profile

Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015

The Economic Contribution of the Qantas Group to Australia

Contents. A TSA Implementation Project: Main aspects of Egypt s Experience. Introduction. Share in the World Market Tourism Statistics

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas Analysis

Aviation Competitiveness. James Wiltshire Head of Policy Analysis

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Mexico

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

RIGA FACTS & FIGURES 2018 RIGA FACTS & FIGURES 2018

total - foreign overnights - domestic overnights

COUNTRY CASE STUDIES: OVERVIEW

Economic Benefits of Air Transport in Belize

The Austrian Federal Economic Chamber. Representing the Interests of Business

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

TSA governance at national level

Morocco. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding. Ref. Ares(2016) /06/2016

France. French Visitors in Finland Statistical Trends and Profile

Travel & Tourism Sector Ranking United Kingdom. Summary of Findings, November 2013

III. TRADE IN COMMERCIAL SERVICES BY CATEGORY

Economic Benefits of Air Transport in El Salvador

Federal Outdoor Recreation Trends Effects on Economic Opportunities

The Economic Impact of Tourism in: Dane County & Madison, Wisconsin. April 2017

INTOUCH. In this issue: MHRA s e-magazine ISSUE 7/2015. Tourism 15% of GDP PAGE 1. Q BOV Deloitte Hotel Survey PAGE 2-3

The Economic Impact of Travel in Minnesota Analysis

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

III. TRADE IN COMMERCIAL SERVICES BY CATEGORY

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at:

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

Transcription:

Similarities and Differences of Travel and Tourism in Poland and Finland a Quantitative Approach Author:Anna Turczak Travel & tourism is one of the world s largest economic sectors. It creates jobs, drives exports, and generates prosperity across the world. As well as its direct economic impact, the industry has significant indirect and induced impacts. The purpose of the paper is to compare Poland and Finland in terms of the main indicators determining the importance of travel & tourism industry for the country s economy. The results obtained were collated with the mean values computed for the entire European Union and the world. Data for 2016 were used for all necessary calculations. The relative size of the sector in the Polish economy and in the Finnish economy is considerably smaller than it is in the case of the mean EU country and the average country in the world. Travel & tourism in Poland, Finland and the global economy key information Tourists travel because they want to view beautiful scenery, to learn about other cultures, to visit friends and relatives, etc. Tourism is an activity that takes place in all continents and its economic significance and impacts are far reaching (Turczak, 2016, p. 79). Travel & tourism is an important economic activity in most countries around the world. Despite the ever-increasing and unpredictable shocks from terrorist attacks and political instability, to health pandemics and natural disasters, travel & tourism continued to show its resilience in 2016. In total, travel & tourism generated 7.6 trillion USD (10.2% of global GDP) and 292 million jobs in 2016, equivalent to 1 in 10 jobs in the global economy. The sector accounted for 6.6% of total global exports and almost 30% of total global service exports (Travel, 2017, p. 1). The sector brings tremendous economic, social, cultural, environmental, and heritage value. Poland is one of the countries with constantly increasing number of visitors. In 2016 the number of tourist arrivals to Poland amounted to 17.5 million. The most popular cities are Warsaw (Poland s capital city and its most important business and economic centre) and Cracow (considered the cultural capital of Poland, famous for its historic sites, including Wawel Castle). Poland has a diversified natural environment. The Baltic Sea in the north and the Sudetes and Carpathian mountain ranges in the south form natural borders of the country. The best recreational destinations include: Masurian lakes (the Masurian Lake District in north-eastern Poland counts around 2,000 lakes on an area of about 52,000 km2); Baltic coast (there are dozens of sea resorts on the coast of Baltic Sea; the coast stretches 770 km; a distinctive part of the coast is the Hel Peninsula, which is 35 km long); Tatra mountains (this is the highest mountain range of Carpathians; the most famous resort for skiing and hiking in the Tatras is Zakopane);

Sudetes (there are lots of tourist resort e.g. Karpacz, Szklarska Poręba for skiing and hiking in the Karkonosze mountains, which is a part of the Sudetes mountain range); Białowieża Forest (Białowieża National Park is the last fragment of the primeval forest which once stretched across the European plain; it is home to the world s largest population of European bison and many other endangered species; the oldest oaks in this forest are 650 years old). In 2016 the number of tourist arrivals to Finland amounted to 2.8 million. There are many attractions in Finland. It is a dream destination for photographers. Much of the area is pristine and virgin. The Finnish landscape is covered with thick pine forests and rolling hills. The country is famous for its many lakes, too. There are nearly 200,000 of them. Finland is known to have excellent quality of water. Tampere is the biggest city on the Finnish Lakeland. Hills and lakes provide fine settings for enjoyable outings and activities at any time of year. Finland contains 40 national parks. Interestingly, Moomin World on the outskirts of Naantali is a theme park based on Tove Jansson children s books about the Moomin. Finland provides opportunities for skiing, lake cruises, hiking, and kayaking, bird-watching, hunting, fishing and ice fishing, among many others. Ice hockey is a popular sport in winter. It is also possible to go ice yachting or ice skating. In the winter tourists in the north of the country often enjoy trips in reindeer sleighs. It is also worth mentioning that in the winter there is a large snowcastle with an ice hotel built every year in the northern town Kemi. Saint Nicholas or Santa Claus is commonly known to live in the northern Lapland region. In the town of Rovaniemi there is the Santa Claus Village for tourists to visit. Rovaniemi is a place from which one can see the Aurora Borealis or Northern lights. Table 1 Basic facts about Poland and Finland (2016) Specification Poland Finland Area 312,679 km 2 338,424 km 2 Population 37.95 million 5.495 million GDP 424.3 billion EUR 215.6 billion EUR GDP per capita 11,000 EUR 39,200 EUR GDP in PPS 771.9 billion EUR 174.3 billion EUR GDP per capita in PPS index (EU28 = 100) * purchasing power standards Source: own compilation based on Eurostat database (access: 11.12.2017). 69 109 The economic and employment impact of travel & tourism Travel & tourism contributes to GDP and employment in many ways. The total contribution of the industry consists of the direct, indirect and induced impacts on the economy. The indirect impact includes the GDP and jobs supported by: travel & tourism investment spending (such as the purchase of new aircraft and construction

of new hotels); government spending on tourism marketing and promotion, aviation, administration, security services, sanitation services, etc.; domestic purchases of goods and services including for example purchases of food and cleaning services by hotels, of fuel and catering services by airlines, and IT services by travel agents (Travel, 2017, p. 2). The induced contribution measures the GDP and jobs supported by the spending of those who are directly or indirectly employed by the travel & tourism industry. The comparison of the travel & tourism s contribution to GDP In 2016 the world average direct contribution of travel & tourism to GDP was 19.1 bn USD per country (3.1% of GDP). In turn, the total contribution of travel & tourism to GDP was 57.3 bn USD/country (10.2% of GDP). The data concerning Poland, Finland, and the EU mean are given in Table 2. Table 2 Travel & tourism s absolute and relative contribution to GDP in 2016 Specification Absolute size (bn USD) Relative size (share) Direct contribution Poland 8.5 1.8% Finland 4.7 2.0% EU28 mean 21.8 3.7% Total contribution Poland 21.1 4.5% Finland 21.1 8.8% EU28 mean 60.1 10.2% In Poland the total contribution of travel & tourism to GDP was twice as large as its direct contribution, in Finland four times and in the EU28 thrice. The comparison of the travel & tourism s contribution to employment In the whole world travel & tourism supported on average 2,152,900 jobs per country (9.6% of jobs), 843,900 directly (3.6% of jobs). Table 1 compares the data regarding Poland and Finland as well as the EU mean.

Table 3 Travel & tourism s absolute and relative contribution to employment in 2016 Specification Absolute size ( 000 jobs) Relative size Direct contribution Poland 305.2 1.9% Finland 52.0 2.1% EU28 mean 407.5 5.0% Total contribution Poland 715.7 4.5% Finland 238.3 9.5% EU28 mean 949.5 11.6% The comparison of the travel & tourism s contribution to exports In the average country of the world travel & tourism generated 7.6 bn USD in exports (6.6%). In Poland, the travel & tourism s contribution to exports was 44.5 bn PLN (»11.3 bn USD) and in Finland 3.2 bn EUR (»3.6 bn USD). Table 4 Travel & tourism s absolute and relative contribution to exports in 2016 Specification Absolute size (bn USD) Relative importance (share) Poland 11.3 4.6% Finland 3.6 4.2% EU28 average 14.9 5.9% The comparison of the travel & tourism s contribution to capital investment When it comes to the average value per country in the world, travel & tourism attracted investment of 4.4 bn USD (4.4% of the total investment) in 2016. In Poland it was 12.0 bn PLN (»3.0 bn USD) and in Finland 1.7 bn EUR (1.9 bn USD). Table 5 Travel & tourism s contribution to capital investment in 2016 Specification Absolute size (bn USD) Relative importance (share) Poland 3.0 3.5% Finland 1.9 3.7% EU28 average 5.7 4.9%

Different components of travel & tourism in Poland and Finland In 2016, leisure travel spending in Poland generated 51.3 bn PLN of direct travel & tourism GDP compared with 12.5 bn PLN for business travel spending. In Finland it was 10.0 bn EUR and 4.2 bn EUR, respectively. Poland Finland 19.6% 29.6% Leisure spending (inbound and domestic) Business spending (inbound and domestic) 80.4% 70.4% Figure 1 Breakdown: business spending vs leisure spending in 2016 In Poland, domestic travel spending generated 19.2 bn PLN of direct travel & tourism GDP compared with 44.5 bn PLN for international tourism receipts. In Finland, it was 10.9 bn EUR and 3.2 bn EUR, respectively. Poland Finland 30.2% 22.9% Domestic travel spending Foreign visitor spending 69.8% 77.1% Figure 2 Breakdown: domestic expenditure vs foreign visitor exports in 2016 Conclusions In 2016 the direct contribution of travel & tourism to GDP in Poland was 1.8% and the total contribution was 4.5%. In Finland the industry accounted for 2.0% (direct contribution) and 8.8% (total contribution) of GDP. In the entire EU, these shares were even higher: 3.7%, 10.2%. In Poland, travel & tourism directly supported 1.9% of employment and the total contribution to employment in the country was 4.5%. In Finland it was more: 2.1% and 9.5%, respectively. In the group of twenty eight EU Member States taken together the obtained results were: 5.0% (direct contribution) and 11.6% (total contribution). In Poland, travel & tourism generated 4.6% of total exports. In Finland it was a bit less (4.2%). In the EU28 is was more (5.9%).

In Poland, travel & tourism investment was 3.5% of the total capital investment, in Finland 3.7%, and in the EU28 4.9%. In Poland, most of the direct travel & tourism GDP was generated by foreign visitor spending. In Finland, on the contrary majority was from domestic travel spending. In both countries leisure travel spending significantly exceeded business travel spending. References Travel & tourism. Economic impact. Poland, (2017), World Travel & Tourism Council. Travel & tourism. Economic impact. Finland, (2017), World Travel & Tourism Council. Turczak A., (2016), Differences in tourism receipts between Mexico and other countries, Estudios en Ciencias Sociales y Administrativas de la Universidad de Celaya, No 6, pp. 65 81. Author Anna Turczak, PhD in economics, aturczak@zpsb.pl Faculty of Economics and Computer Science, The West Pomeranian Business School in Szczecin, Poland Field of scientific interests the use of quantitative methods in economics Dr. Anna Turczak visited Tampere University of Applied Sciences in September 2017 as a guest lecturer within the Erasmus+ programme.