This Book Belonged to. of Judge Richard R. Baxter. The Private Collection. THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Washington College of Law Library.

Similar documents
International Boundary Study

Washington College of Law Library. This Book Belonged to The Private Collection

This Book Belonged to The Private Collection

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY STUDY. SERIES A. LIMITS IN THE SEAS. NUM--ETC(UI UNCLASSIFI1ED EN~D

Maritime Areas Act, 1983 (1)(Act No. 15 of 19 May 1983)

May 23, 1972 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY STUDY. LIMITS IN THE SEAS No. 42. nations, or ).

UNCLOS Law of the Seas. Student Activity. That s not a rock in my water!

Law on the boundaries of the maritime tract, 10 March 1993

Taken from UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

PART 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. English Translation of the Russian Original

The Senate and the Chamber of Representatives of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay, meeting in general assembly, decree:

The following ministries, departments and agencies of the Government of the Solomon Islands involved in the preparation of the Submission:

SITE ELEVATION AMSL...Ground Elevation in feet AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT...Height Above Ground Level OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL...Total Overall Height AMSL

2009 No ANTARCTICA. The Antarctic (Amendment) Regulations 2009

Decrees, orders, circulars

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Partial Amended Submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in Respect of the North Area

The Aegean Maritime Disputes and International Law

(a) What are the geographical co-ordinates of the point at which the right bank of the San Juan River meets the sea at the low-water line?

APPENDIX D FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS, PART 77

Application for a Research Cruise within Waters under Ireland s Jurisdiction

LATIN AMERICA / CARIBBEAN COIBA NATIONAL PARK PANAMA

Submission of REPUBLICA ORIENTAL DEL URUGUAY. to the COMMISSION ON THE LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF

National Seas Act 1977, Act No. 7 of 7 February 1977 PART I PRELIMINARY

September 20, Submitted via

Act on Aviation Emissions Trading (34/2010; amendments up to 37/2015 included)

Kermadec. Ocean Sanctuary

DECLARATION OF JUDGE SEBUTINDE

arrangements for the measurement of the territorial sea or the division of the continental shelf of maritime nations.

National Seas Act 1977 Chapter 361.

Settlement Policy for Commercial Pilots In Drug and Alcohol Testing Cases

LAWS OF DOMINICA TERRITORIAL SEA, CONTIGUOUS ZONE, EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC AND FISHERY ZONES ACT CHAPTER 1:11. Act 26ofl981

Amendment of Restricted Areas R-2907A and R-2907B, Lake George, FL; and R-2910, Pinecastle, FL

Official Gazette of the French Republic No of 1 November Text No. 6

Foreign Civil Aviation Authority Certifying Statements. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUPERSEDED. [Docket No NM-217-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee; Transport Airplane and Engine Issues; New Task

ACTION: Final rule; notice of policy change and availability. SUMMARY: This action supplements the preamble published in the Federal Register

Notification and Reporting of Aircraft Accidents or Incidents. and Overdue Aircraft, and Preservation of Aircraft Wreckage,

Advisory Circular. 1.1 Purpose Applicability Description of Changes... 2

Further Scottish Leasing Round (Saltire Prize Projects) Discussion Paper on Proposed Geographic Areas March 2010

General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) Customer Protection Rights Regulation

Asia Pacific Regional Aviation Safety Team

2. Dominican Republic

Docket No. FAA ; Amendment No ; SFAR No. 77. Prohibition Against Certain Flights Within the Territory and Airspace of Iraq

Procedures for Approval of Master Minimum Equipment List

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 5, 2008 GUALALA BLUFF TRAIL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

APPENDIX A TERMS OF DESIGNATION

Aero Design Battery Shop

RE: Draft AC , titled Determining the Classification of a Change to Type Design

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

RULES AND REGULATIONS

REGULATION No. 990/2017 on the operation of remotely piloted aircraft CHAPTER I. General provisions Article 1 Objective

(i) Adopted or adapted airworthiness and environmental standards;

White Paper Air Cargo Screening Interim Final Rule 2009

Office of Commercial Space Transportation: Notice of Availability, Notice of Public

2. CANCELLATION. AC 39-7B, Airworthiness Directives, dated April 8, 1987, is canceled.

4 Rights and duties in connection with the conduct of petroleum activities

CAAC China. CCAR 121 Subpart P Crew members Flight and Duty time Limits, and Rest Requirements Revision Oct-2017

DECLARATION OF JUDGE GEVORGIAN

Order for Greenland on the safe navigation, etc. of ships

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 8, 2016

left: Coombe Island from Wheeler

APPENDIX C-1 [COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND MANDAMUS RELIEF]

Amendment Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-164-AD

CHAPTER FISHERY LIMITS ORDINANCE and Subsidiary Legislation

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-222-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

4.0 Context for the Crossing Project

Cooperation Agreements for SAR Service and COSPAS-SARSAT SEARCH AND RESCUE AGREEMENTS: OVERVIEW. (Presented by United States)

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DIVISION 12 MARINE RESERVES AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS IN THE TERRITORIAL SEA

Air Carrier E-surance (ACE) Design of Insurance for Airline EC-261 Claims

[Docket No. FAA ; Airspace Docket No. 14-ASO-4] SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E Airspace at Newnan, GA,

Unit 1 Lesson 1: Introduction to the Dry Tortugas and Sustainable Seas Expedition

[Federal Register: April 23, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 78)] SUPERSEDED. Docket No. 98-NM-337-AD; Amendment ; AD

** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. [CIS No ; DHS Docket No.: USCIS ]

International Boundary Study. Tanzania Uganda Boundary

Aeronautical Information Services Issue 1 30 May 2012

SERVICE LETTER REVISION

Annex 1 to letter 0426(DPRM.REM)1035 of 16 April I. Articles 28 and 29 of the UPU Convention. Article 28 Terminal dues. General provisions

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-043-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

SUBCHAPTER E AIRSPACE

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-015-AD] Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company Airplanes; Initial Regulatory

ASTSWMO Special Travel Policy May 2018

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AIR CARGO SECURITY REQUIREMENTS: 49 CFR 1540 ET AL. DOCKET TSA *rq3 COMMENTS OF BRITISH AIRWAYS, PLC

International Boundary Study. Mali Niger Boundary

Program Activity 1: Santa Cruz de Tenerife

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /2010

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-155-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VACAVILLE ADDING CHAPTER 9

Introduction to the Data Catalogue

ORDER REQUESTING PROPOSALS

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Water Quality Trends for Patchogue Bay

CHAPTER 7: COASTAL AND MARINE RESOURCES

Channel Islands Occupation Society

[Docket No. FAA ; Product Identifier 2016-NM-205-AD; Amendment. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

(No. 76) (Approved June 6, 2002) AN ACT

CAREERSOURCE FLORIDA BUSINESS TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT GUIDELINES FOR BOARD MEMBERS AND STAFF

Transcription:

THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Washington College of Law Library This Book Belonged to The Private Collection of Judge Richard R. Baxter THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Washington college of ~ a w Law Library Waship%on, D.C. i I

!Phis paper is one of a series issued by The Geographer, Bureau of Intelligence and Research of the Department of State. The aim of the series is to set forth the basis for nationa2 arrangements for the measurement of the territorial sea or the division of the continental shelf of maritime nations. Intended for background use on ly, this research docwnent does not represent an official acceptance of the United States Government of the line or Zines represented or, the charts or, necessarily, of the specific principles involved, if any, in the original drafting of the lines. Additional copies may be requested by mail from The Geographer, Department of State, Washington, D.C. 20520, or by telephone (Area Code 202, 632-2021 or 632-2022). LIMITS I N THE SEAS No. 34 (revised) Straight Baselines: Iceland July 1, 1974 The Geographer Office of the Geographer Bureau of Intelligence and Research

Iceland revised its straight baseline system for the fourth time with the signing on July 14, 1972, of new Regulations Concerning the Fishery Jurisdiction of Iceland. The 1972 regulations altered the 1961 straight baseline system (other straight baseline decrees were issued in 1952 and 1958) and extended the Icelandic fishery limits to 50 nautical miles as measured from the straight baselines. The new regulations became effective on September 1, 1972. Iceland claims a four-nautical-mile territorial sea, as well as the 50-nautical-mile fishery limit. Although a signatory, it is not a party to any of the four 1958 Geneva conventions on the law of the sea. These conventions concern the territorial sea and contiguous zone, the high seas, the continental shelf, and fishing and conservation of living resources of the high seas. The pertinent articles of the Regulations Concerning the Fishery Jurisdiction of Iceland are as follows: ARTICLE I. The fishery limits off Iceland shall be drawn 50 nautical miles outside baselines drawn between the following points: 1. Horn 66'27'4 N 22'24'3 W 2. Asbudarrif 66'08'1-20'11'0-3. Raudinupur 66'30'7-16'32'4-4. Rifstangi 66'32'3-16'11'8-5. Hraunhafnartangi 66'32'2-16'01'5-6. Langanes 66'22'7-14'31'9-7. Glettinganes 65'30'5-13'36'3-8. Nordf j ardarhorn 65'10'0-13'30'8-9. Gerpir 65'04'7-13'29'6-10. Holmur 64'58'9-13'30'6 -

- 2-11. Hvitingar 64'23'9-14'28'0-12. Stokksnes 64'14'1-14'58'4-13. Hrollaugseyjar 64O01'7-15'58'7-14. Tvisker 63O55'7-16'11'3-15. Ingolfshofdi 63'47'8-16'38'5-16. Hvalsiki 63'44'1-17'33'5-17. Medallandssandur I 63'32'4-17'55'6-18. Medallandssandur I1 63'30'6-17'59'9-19. Myrnatangi 63'27'4-18'11'8-20. Kotlutangi 63'23'4-18O42'8-21. Lundadrangur 63'23'5-19'07'5-22. Geirfuglasker 63'19'0-20'29'9-23. Eldeyjardrangur 63'43'8-22'59'4-24. Geirfugladrangur 63'40'7-23"17'1-25. Skalasnagi 64'51'3-24O02'5-26. Bjargtangar 65'30'2-24'32'1-27. Kopanes 65'48'4-24'06'0-28. Bardi 66'03'7-23'47'4-29. Straumnes 66'25'7-23'08'4-30. Kogur 66'28'3-22'55'5-31. Horn 66'27'9-22'28'2 - Limits shall also be drawn around the following points 50 nautical miles seaward: 32. Kolbeinsey 67'08'8 M 18'40'6 W 33. Hvalbakur 64O35'8-13'16'6 -

- 3 - Each nautical mile shall be equal to 1852 metres.... ARTICLE 7. These Regulations are promulgated in accordance with Law No. 44 of 5 April 1948, concerning the Scientific Conservation of the Continental Shelf Fisheries, cfr. Law No. 81 of 8 December 1952. When these Regulations become effective, Regulations No. 3 of 11 March 1961, concerning the Fishery Limits off Iceland shall cease to be effective. ARTICLE 8. These regulations become effective on 1 September 1972. Ministry of Fisheries, 14 July 1972. Ludvik Josepsson. Jon L. Arnalds. ANALYSIS The 1952 regulation on the extension of fishery limits promulgated a system of straight baselines based on 48 basepoints. The islands of Kolbeinsey, Hvalbakur, and Geirfugladrangur were specified as supplemental basepoints, but they were not part of the system of straight baselines. These islands, in addition to the island of Grimsey, had four-nautical-mile(n.m.) fishery limits drawn about them. The straight baselines and the basepoints were delimited on the principle that Breidafjordhur and Faxafloi were "historic bays." The system of straight baselines was patterned on the Norwegian system, a difference being

- 4 - that generally the Icelandic baselines are closer to the mainland than is the Norwegian prototype. The 1958 regulation on fishery limits did not change any of the straight baselines or basepoints of the 1952. regulation. The change stipulated by the 1958 regulation was that the fishery limits would be extended 12 n.m. from the straight baselines as (1 opposed to the 4 n.m. limits specified in the 1952 regulation. An exchange of notes between Iceland and the United Kingdom, on March 11, 1961, specified changes that were to be made in the straight baselines decreed in the 1958 regulation. The number of basepoints in the 1961 system was reduced to 40, including Kolbeinsey and Hvalbakur, which are not part of the straight baseline system. The island of Grimsey was again singled out as having a fishery limit, but the island was not designated a basepoint by number. The 1972 re-delimitation of the straight baseline system expanded the area of internal waters on the north coast of Iceland, while slightly reducing the internal waters on the east coast. The 1972 system removed basepoints 3, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16, and 17 from the 1961 baseline system. The new baseline on the north coast connecting Asbudarif (2) and Raudhinupur (3), with a length of 92 nautical miles, is the longest baseline in the system. The shortest straight baseline, 4.2 nautical miles, connects Rifstangi (4) with Hraunhafnartangi (5). The following point-by-point analysis of the straight baselines utilizes Chart N.O. 38035 (H.O. 6910, 1st ed., April 28, 1958; revised April 11, 1966) published by the U.S. Navy Oceanographic Office. Segment Distance (n.m. 1 1-2 56.75 2-3 92.00 Comments Closes Hunafloi by connectins the western headland, Horn (l), with Asbudarif (21, which is a chain of drying and above-water rocks that extends northward about 5/8 n.m. from the mainland. The 1972 baseline removed four baselines from the 1961 system, thereby encompassing 3

- 5 - Segment 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 Distance (n.m.) 8.40 4.20 37.40 57.70 21.00 5.40 Comments more internal waters. The new baseline connecting Asbudarif (2) with Raudhinupur (3) is the longest segment of the system. The new baseline may be considered to be unreasonably long since the 1961 baseline system more closely approximated the general direction of the coastline and did effectively protect Icelandic internal waters. Connects Raudhinupur (3) with Rifstangi (4), which is the northernmost point of the Icelandic mainland. Connects Rifstangi (4) with Hraunhafnartangi (5), which is a spit extending about 1 n.m. northward from the mainland. Closes Thistilfjordhur by connecting the western headland, Hraunhafnartangi (5), with Langanes (6), which is the eastern headland. Closes Bakkafloi, Vopanfjordur, Heradhsfloi, and Borgarfjordhur by connecting the northern headland of Bakkafloi, Langanes (6), w ith the southern headland of Borgarfjordhur, Glettinganes (7). Closes a number of small fjords by connecting Glettinganes (7) with Nordfjardarhorn (8). Connects Nordfjardarhorn (8) with Gerpir (9), which is the easternmost point of the Icelandic mainland.

- 6 - Segment Distance (n.m.1 Comments 9-10 5.50 Connects Gerpir (9), on the mainland, with Holmur (101, a small offshore island. * 10-11 42.75 Connects Holmur (10) with Hvitingar (ll), which is a rock lying 1 3/4 n.m. from the mainland. Hvitingar should not be used as a basepoint because it is a low-tide elevation. The 1958 Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone states in Article 4-3 that: Baselines shall not be drawn to or from low-tide elevations, unless lighthouses or similar installations which are permanently above sea level have been built on them. The new baseline reduced Icelandic internal waters minimally since offshore islands lie seaward. J 11-12 16. 00 Connects Hvitingar (11) with Stokksnes (12), which is on the mainland. 12-13 30. 80 Connects Stokksnes (12) with Hrollaugseyjar (13), which is made up of three flat islets about 4 1/2 n.m. offshore. 13-14 7.70 Connects,Hrollaugsyej ar (1 3) with Tvisker (14), which is made up of two small islets lying 5 n.m. offshore. 14-15 14.50 Connects Tvisker (14) with Ingolfshofdhi (15), which is on a small peninsula separated from the mainland by an extremely narrow passage. ' 15-16 24.70 Connects Ingolfshofdhi (15) with Hvalsiki (16), which is a river mouth on a rather smooth coastline. There seems to be little

- 7 - Segment Distance hem. 1 Comments justification for. the construction of this line'when physical features are taken into account. 16-17 17-18 14.50 -- Connects Hvalsiki (16) with Medallandssandur I (17). The latter is located on a small spit on an otherwise smooth coast. Seems to be little rationale for using Point 17 as a basepoint. Two points are not connected, by a baseline. 18-19 6.20 Connects Medallandssandur I1 (181, which is an insignificant point on a straight coastline, with Myrnatangi (19), &ice is the southwest end of a coastal island. The straight baseline between the two points serves no function because it is coextensive with the coastline along the island. 19-20 20-21 21-22 14.50 11.20 36.80 Connects Myrnatangi (19) with Kotlutangi (20), which is a flat stretch of sand on a smooth coastline. There is no need for the straight baseline as it is coextensive with the coastline. Connects Kotlutangi (20) with Lundadrangur (21), which is an islet about 3/4 n.m. offshore. Connects Lundadrangur (21) with Geirfuglasker (22), an islet some 15 1/2 n.m. from the mainland. This segment of the straight baselines deviates markedly from the general trend of the coast. Of interest is the island of Surtsey, 3 n.m. southwest of Geirfuglasjer,

- 8 - Segment Distance (n.m. ) Comments which is the result of a volcanic eruption in 1963. Surtsey is probably not used as a basepoint because of the uncertainty as to its longevity. 22-23 70.30 23-24 5.50 Connects Geirfuglasker (22) with Eldeyjardrangur (23), which is a rock 8 n.m. offshore. This segment of the baseline trends in a northwesterly direction, returning closer to the mainland than Point 22. Connects Eldeyjardrangur (23) with Geirfugladrangur (24), which is a rock 16 n.m. offshore. (It was reported on April 18, 1972, that Geirfuglandrangur had disappeared. No statement announcing the rediscovery of the rock has been received.) The question arises as to why Point 23 was designated a basepoint when in view of the Icelandic method of delimiting baselines it would seem that they would have connected Geirfuglasker (22) directly to Geirfugladrangur (24). 24-25 25-26 74.10 40.30 Connects Geirfugladrangur (24) with Skalasnagi (25), which is a coastal point on the Snaefellsnes peninsula. The line connecting the two points form the closing line for the Faxafloi, which is an historic bay. The two basepoints are not headlands of the Faxafloi. Closes the historic bay of Rreidafjordhur by connecting Skalasnagi (25), a point near the southern headland of the fjord, with Bjargtangar (26), which is the northern headland of the fjord.

- 9 - Segment Distance (n.m.1 Comments t 26-27 21.00 Connects Bjargtangar (26) with Kopanes (271, which is the northern headland of Talknafjordhur and the southern headland of Arnarfjordhur. 27-28 17.10 Connects Kopanes (27) with Bardi (281, which is the southern headland of Onundarfjordhur. 28-29 29-30 30-31 TOTAL 27.40 5.60 10.90 783.20 Connects Bardi (28) with Straumnes (291, which is a prominent point on a small inlet. Connects Straumnek (29) with Kogurnes (30), which is the headland cf a small bay. Connects Kogurnes (30) with Horn (31), a peninsula also called North Cape. No straight baselines are drawn around the following basepoints, but rather each island has a 50 n.m. fishery limit. 32 Kolbeinsey (67' 07' N., 18" 36' W.). This small islet lies 55 n.m. north of the mainland. 33 Hvalbakur (64' 36' N., 13' 15' W.j. A small islet 19 n.m. off the eastern mainland. SUMMARY Generally, the Icelandic system of straight baselines follows the criteria established by Article 4 of the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone. That is, the baselines do not depart markedly from the general direction of the coast, and the large fjords of the deeply indented coastline appear to be linked closely enough with the land to be considered within the regime of internal waters. However, a serious question arises about

- 10 - the validity of straight baselines drawn around an island group or archipelago. It is not a generally accepted tenet of international law that straight baselines can be drawn around islands or island groups, even though some larger insular areas have been so enclosed (Madagascar, Ireland, and the United Kingdom). In ascertaining the validity of the Icelandic actions in promulgating straight baselines, it must be determined whether or not Iceland is to be considered an island for purposes of constructing straight baselines. If so, it is not generally accepted that straight baselines can be drawn about islands. On the other hand, if Iceland is considered to have the characteristics of a mainland feature, it is more widely accepted that reasonable baselines can be drawn about such an area in a manner which brings coastal islands into the regime of the coastal configuration. One basepoint, however, does not meet the specifications set forth in the above Convention. No low-tide elevations are to be used as basepoints unless a permanent above-water installation is present on the feature. This rule was violated in the initial 1952 regulation, but the action was taken before the advent of the 1958 Geneva Convention. However, Iceland could have rectified the discrepancy by not using Hvitingar (11) as a basepoint in the 1961 and 1972 declarations. The Icelandic baselines contain four segments which exceed the length of the longest baseline approved by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case. The ICJ on December 18, 1951, approved a Norwegian straight baseline 44 n.m. long. The four extensive Icelandic baselines are: 1-2 (56.75 n.m.), 2-3 (92.00 n.m.), 6-7 (57.7 n.m.), 22-23 (70.3 n.m.1, and 24-25 (74.1 n.m.1. The Icelandic baselines, although quite lengthy, are not the longest in the world. Burma has baselines of 222.3 n.m. and 80.8 n.m. in length, and Madagascar has three baselines with lengths of 123.1 n.m., and 117.7 n.m., and 86.0 n.m.