The bypass is west of the current crossing, leaving only local traffic using the existing road.

Similar documents
PEDESTRIAN ONLY TRAFFIC SIGNALS.

USING SCOOT MULTI-NODES TO REDUCE PEDESTRIAN DELAY AT DUAL CROSSINGS IN BRISTOL

02/06/2016. TSRGD 2016: Signals and cycling. Sally Gibbons Senior Engineer Traffic Division 2 June Legislation. IHE Traffic Signal Design Course

Puffins at Junctions Design & Modelling Implications. JCT Symposium Paper 18 September 2003

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub

Hazardous Cattle Crossing: Use of Flashing Amber Lamps

Attachment No. 20 RRLRT No. 1. Committee. Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Module TS9. Level crossings - signallers regulations. GE/RT8000/TS9 Rule Book. Issue 3. March 2014

APPENDIX A RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION

FOREWORD. July 2006 July Release 1.0 Page 2

Integration of Pedestrian Traffic Signal Control within SCOOT-UTC Systems

Map showing location of public transport projects in vicinity of railway station

Queen s Circus Roundabout

GK/GN0692. Guidance on Level Crossing Interface Requirements. Rail Industry Guidance Note for GK/RT0192. Published by

Grade Crossings in High Speed Rail Corridors

Gap Acceptance for Pelicans under SCOOT Implementation (GAPS) Guide Lines

"TOUCAN" - An unsegregated crossing for pedestrians and cyclists

Effects of Weather and Traffic controlled Variable Speed Limits in Sweden

2017 POLICY DOCUMENT. M1 Action Plan. Putting Queenslanders First

Module TW8. Level crossings - drivers instructions. GE/RT8000/TW8 Rule Book. Issue 7. September 2015

V6 Revised & Updated Oct 10 A Fitch A Marson D Moore J Silvester 04/11/10. V5 Revised & Updated Jun 07 A Fitch D Moore - J Silvester 08/06/07

AREMA C&S Manual Index (Includes 2018 Revisions) Volume SECTION 3 - HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING WARNING SYSTEMS

SOUTHBOUND YONGE STREET TO EASTBOUND HIGHWAY 401 F L Y -UNDER

Issue 8. Module TW8. Level crossings - drivers instructions. GERT8000-TW8 Rule Book

Multi-storey station car park opens in New Year

Monitoring and data acquisition for the safety related traffic information services

NR is also currently conducting two other studies, those for the Cambridgeshire Corridor and for Ely Area Capacity Enhancements.

lighting road markings Part 2 td 89/08 use of passively safe signposts, lighting columns and traffic signal posts to bs en 12767: 2007


Appendix 6 Fulbourn Greenway Review

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure

EAST WEST RAIL EASTERN SECTION. prospectus for growth

For the theory test you could be asked about all of them so what are the differences?

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES MANUAL FOR WORK ZONES

Improving Safety at Level Crossings - JR East Developments

Document Control Identification. Document History. Authorisation. Rail Safety Manager Brookfield Rail

LOOK OUT COLLISION AWARENESS. Our Products Alert Employees Of Dangerous Collisions BEFORE They Occur! LEADERS OF INTERSECTION PROTECTION

Public Meeting: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) Transportation Network Company (TNC) Lot on S. Eads Street

Wellington $312 $49 $456 OVERVIEW WELLINGTON REGIONAL SUMMARY

Contact details. Signage clarity

Level Crossing Interface Requirements

Suffolk Chamber Transport Board Greater Anglia. 16 January 2018

Transit s forecasts of expenditure in Waikato for the next 10 years are set out in Table WK1.

A63 Castle Street, Hull HullBID Network Lunch 24 August 2017

London Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS WITHIN BIRMINGHAM

Location Outside 27 West Street (Ladbrokes) see picture Fig4. This location seems to give most viability in both directions. West Street, Buckingham

Transport Assessment Appendix M: Avonmouth Impacts

These elements are designed to make service more convenient, connected, and memorable.

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure

Business Case Approved. Under Construction. Business Case Approved. Under Construction

77 McDonnell-Lindbergh - Monday thru Friday NORTHBOUND Effective: March 18, Shopping Center North County. Shopping Center Washington &

Major Scheme Business Case Summary Report for Programme Entry

Ermine Street Environmental Enhancements

M56. New Junction 11a Summary of the consultation report

Felixstowe Branch Line FAQ

HIGHWAYS PANEL held at COUNCIL OFFICES LONDON ROAD SAFFRON WALDEN at 7.30pm on 23 MARCH 2015

A303. Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Preferred Route Announcement

Date 24/10/2011. Date 04/11/2011. Date 25/10/2011. Date 10/11/2011. Date 25/10/2011. Date 25/10/2011. Date 10/11/2011.

HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING 4 QUAD GATES. William H. Watson. Amtrak

Dyke Road Cycle and Pedestrian Improvements 14/02/2014 Reference number PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND GUARDRAILING ASSESSMENT

FILLED WITH FACTS & ACTIVITIES. e s. t o. e f. f l BE SAFE, STAY ALIVE!

Power Tong Torque Manual

Blackburn Road Blackburn Level Crossing Removal. Frequently Asked Questions August 2014 GENERAL

Route 29 Solutions Projects

Community Highways Volunteering Cambridge City Information Pack 2017/18

Pelican AMR Gateway User Guide

Appendix 9 Melbourn Greenway Review

Riverside Heights, Norwich. Travel Plan

Press Release Mérignac, Tuesday June 28 th 2016

Northern Beaches Transport Action Plan

Frequently Asked Questions on the Route 29 Solutions Improvements Projects

Concur Travel: User Supplied Hotels

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement

PROTECTED AIRSPACE ASSESSMENT TOOL (PAAT) USER MANUAL

Provincial Railway Technical Standards

Safety Interlock Switches

JOINT CORE STRATEGY FOR BROADLAND, NORWICH AND SOUTH NORFOLK EXAMINATION MATTER 3C EASTON/COSTESSEY

SPEDESTER Series QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE

Low cost solutions to improve safety at level crossings in Hungary

Document Control Identification. Document History. Authorisation. Rail Safety Manager Brookfield Rail

PART 8. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proposals for the Harrogate Road / New Line Junction Improvement Scheme. August / September Supported by:

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

PARKS CANADA SIGNING ALONG PROVINCIAL HIGHWAYS

Strategic Transport Forum 7 th December 2018

Smart-UPS Installation Guide 750/1000/1500/2200/3000 VA 120/230 Vac 500 VA 100 Vac Tower Important Safety Messages

Our ref: FRC/REC/Nov Steve Farrell Clerk to the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee The Scottish Parliament.

SUPPORTING ECONOMIC GROWTH (Improving journey times, enabling people to get to jobs, supporting new housing growth)

Death of Liku Onesi following collision with a Police vehicle

For full product information, visit Use the SpeedSpec Code or scan the QR Code for quick access to the specific web page.

M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart motorway

Proposed Lidl Food store West Hendford, Yeovil

TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

BASCHURCH PARISH COUNCIL CHAIRMAN S ANNUAL REPORT 2017

Trial of farside pedestrian signals at a Puffin crossing

General-Use Auto-Tuning HPX-T Series

212iLM Mullion (ILLUMINATED WEATHER RESISTANT) Keypad

CPA2 1256: ft V/2.8nm H

Transcription:

Paul Finch and Chris Kennett September 2018 The Cambridge Method Shuttle Working and VMS with Overheight Detection The historic City of Ely was once an island, but is now bordered to the south by a railway line and river. The main route into Ely from the South and East, the A142, crosses both. A level crossing carries large vehicles over the railway line, while a bridge allows smaller vehicles to pass under without waiting. Large vehicles using the crossing frequently block the main road, adding delay and congestion for all road users. As a result, the Ely Southern Bypass is being built to relieve congestion where the road, rail and river meet. The bypass is west of the current crossing, leaving only local traffic using the existing road. The railbridge over the road, allowing the A142 to pass under it, is one of the lowest in the country, at just 2.7m clearance, and is frequently struck.

Once the new bypass is open, the level crossing (on the right of the photo) is to be closed to both vehicles and pedestrians. Instead, an improved footway and cycleway is to be built passing under the bridge. Green Signals Consulting were engaged by Skanska to undertake the design of shuttle-working signals and an improved overheight vehicle warning system, to allow construction of the wide footway. Bridge strikes are already a frequent problem at the bridge, due to the unusually low height. This is despite the high visibility of the bridge. And the existing Variable Message Signs, triggered by Overheight Vehicle Detectors, do not seem to make much difference. This may be due to the short distances from the OVD to the VMS, or from the signs to the bridge, which allow little reaction time. The existing VMS are small and not highly visible, even when they are lit. They are also text-only.

Having looked at the existing equipment and problems, we concluded that there were several problems with the existing layout, which we needed to address to be successful. Short journey times between OVD and VMS do not give drivers time to react. There is not enough time to read the message once it is shown. The VMS are of no use to drivers who cannot read English There is not enough stopping distance from the VMS to the bridge. Our solution was to redesign the location of equipment and to change the sign faces. The new VMS are now located as Gateways at the entrances to the cutting. The overheight vehicle detection is mounted much further back, giving a much greater distance from OVD to VMS. The VMS themselves are larger, including fixed text at the top and bottom, with a variable symbol that can be shown in the centre and amber flashing lamps above and below the text. The unusual sign face did generate much debate! The OVD southbound is now placed on a nearby Toucan Crossing, which is being refurbished as part of the scheme. For northbound vehicles, standalone poles are being used. The detectors will now trigger approximately 5 seconds journey time away from the signs, giving drivers time to read and react to the sign. The crossing, OVD and signs will all be linked back to the shuttle working signals for monitoring.

Why the Cambridge Method of Shuttle Working? Cambridgeshire County Council only had two shuttle working sites for many years, both originally Siemens T400 controllers, using an unusual configuration. These sites had been in use for VA shuttle working for more than 20 years, but recently more shuttle working sites have started to be built in the area and the configuration ideas have been introduced on sites in Norfolk. With more sites, including Ely, being planned and built, the method is being rediscovered and shared. The dummy extendable all red phases are extended in the controller by all-red detection, when an opposing demand (real, or revertive) is present. Controller Phase Maxes are used to limit the extendable all red. The revertive stage has a separate dummy phase and stage, with short intergreens, but can only run once the previous all-red (either stage 2 or 4) is no longer extending. The site is configured with two real phases, A and B, and also two extendable clearance phases, C and D. There is also an additional dummy phase for a revertive all red, E. There is one phase per stage and each real-traffic stage is always followed by an associated all red clearance stage (1 to 2, or 3 to 4). Stages 2 and 4 have short intergreens back to the previous stage, but have a higher minimum intergreen to the next stage. Extensions of the all red stages are controlled by special conditioning, which also triggers outputs, wired to MOVA detectors. These are configured in MOVA as priority detectors, demanding and extending the all-red stages. Although MOVA extends the stages using force bits, the extendable all-red stages cannot be skipped or shortened and are only really controlled by the controller. Allowing MOVA to send force bits simply avoids triggering long interstage faults.

This method of operation allows very rapid ripple back to the previous stage from the revertive. It will not ever repeat or skip stages while opposed and avoids delays when reverting, giving better end-of-stage changes. It also enables the use of MOVA on sites with long, extendable intergreens. Acknowledgements With thanks to Cambridgeshire County Council and Skanska. Photos by Author, Google and Cambridge Evening News. The Authors Paul Finch Paul.finch@greensignals.co.uk Chris Kennett Chris.kennett@greensignals.co.uk