RE: PATAHA CREEK FECAL COLIFORM COMPLIANCE WITH WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

Similar documents
CITY OF LYNDEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT MARCH 1, 2016

Water Quality Trends for Patchogue Bay

Water Quality Trends for Conscience Bay

FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA SUMMARY SHEET

Meeting Agenda. Why are we here? Getting Started. Designated Uses. Water Quality Standards

Assessment of Pathogen Strategies

ASSESSMENT OF FECAL COLIFORM IN LITTLE RABBIT CREEK AND LITTLE SURVIVAL CREEK

FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING IN GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY: SUMMARY REPORT OF MONITORING RESULTS FOR

Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring for the Sleepy Creek Watershed Incremental 319 Project Final Report

City of Peoria Clean Water Efforts. Governor s s Conference on the Management of the Illinois River October 4, 2007

Tufts University Water: Systems, Science, and Society (WSSS) Program

International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control Annual Report to the International Joint Commission

Portland Water District Sebago Lake Monitoring Programs Lower Bay Bacteria Monitoring Presenting data from 1977 to 2018 Laurel Jackson

Fourth Creek (Subbasin ) Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin North Carolina

Lower St. Johns River Tributaries Fecal Coliform Basin Management Action Plan Jacksonville Environmental Symposium

Figure 1. Overview map of Burrard Inlet, showing location of False Creek inlet.

Whatcom County Water Quality Monitoring: Fecal Coliform Quality Assurance Project Plan

Fecal Coliform TMDL for Saint Joes Creek, WBID 1668A

FINAL Water Year 2012 Bacteria Sampling Report for the Klamath River Estuary

Land-Use and Water Quality Across the Cape Fear River Basin, NC: from 2001 to Jennifer Braswell Alford, PhD

Statistical Evaluation of BMP Effectiveness in Reducing Fecal Coliform Impairment in Mermentau River Basin

Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring 2002 Annual Report

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration, Bureau of Watershed Restoration

White Oak Creek. Recreational Use Attainability Analysis Summary of Findings. Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas

North Carolina Addendum Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Impaired Segments in the Dan River Watershed to Virginia TMDLs Approved by EPA Region 3

Fecal and Total Coliform TMDL for Sparkman Branch (WBID 1561)

Total Maximum Daily Loads of Bacteria for Poquoson River and Back Creek in the City of Poquoson and in York County, Virginia

Recreational Use Attainability Analysis Summary of Findings & Public Comment

Exploring Drivers of Fecal Coliform Pollution Trends in the Puget Sound. Washington Commercial Shellfish

Fecal Coliform TMDL for Strawberry Creek (WBID 2239)

International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control Annual Report to the International Joint Commission

Bacteria Contamination of Surface Waters Due to Livestock Grazing in the Stanislaus National Forest, California (Second Year of Study)

Finding sources of fecal coliform bacteria in stormwater runoff

Staff Report of Oakland Bay Activities 10/1/08 to 12/31/08. 1/15/09 Stephanie Kenny. Funded through Consolidated Contract # C14956

International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control Annual Report to the International Joint Commission

Total Coliform and Fecal Coliform TMDL for Lower Sweetwater Creek (WBID 1570A)

Fecal Coliform Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) - North Branch of the Sunrise River Final Report

Pathogens and Grazing Livestock

Part V. 2012/2013 Annual Monitoring Plan Report 6/1/2012 5/31/2013 (Year 2) City of Jacksonville/FDOT NPDES Permit

Analysis of Indicator Bacteria in NJ Dead-end Lagoons. Michael Callaghan Gasbarro Mentor: Dr. Kathryn Goddard

Water Quality Report for Auburn Ravine Water Year

Annual Report /2016 Port Hedland Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program

WIFSS research on E. coli O157:H7 in central coastal California. Rob Atwill, D.V.M., Ph.D. University of California-Davis

SECTION 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE RIVER BASIN

Canada CAR s FTDT. Part VII - Commercial Air Services Subpart 0 - General Division III. Flight Time and Flight Duty Time Limitations and Rest Periods

Version Isolated & Non-Waters Only 1 of 3

Water quality monitoring and analysis of fecal coliform of Canadarago Lake tributaries and outlet

City and County of San Francisco

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

LAKE HURON BEACH STUDY

Mark West Creek Flow Study Report

Piedra River Protection Workgroup Meeting #5 Feb. 21, 2012 Ross Aragon Community Center, Pagosa Springs

X. WHATCOM CREEK SMA. X.1 Watershed Analysis. X.1.1 Landscape Setting

Profile of the Palouse Region

Permittees under Sector S are primarily engaged in the following types of activities:

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Review and Recommendations

Hydrology Input for West Souris River IWMP

Loyalsock Creek Bacterial Coliforms. Presented By: Dr. Mel Zimmerman Clean Water Institute Lycoming College Matthew Bennett Jim Rogers

Annual Report to the. International Joint Commission. from the. International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control for

Long Pond Study

The Evolution of DFW Airport s Deicing Program Balancing Risks with Results MAY 20, 2015

Appendix E. Pollutant Load Maps of SWAT Model Results

II. THE BOULDER CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2013 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, VA

Clean Ocean Access Water Quality Monitoring Summary Report

Nutrient and Sediment Loss from the Watersheds of Canandaigua Lake

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-291-AD; Amendment ; AD R1]

BIG HORN RIVER. Big Horn Canal Bluff Fritz Highland Hanover Kirby Lower Hanover Lucerne Tillard Upper Hanover

Introduction. The System. Model Limitations, Assumptions, and Parameters. Optional Services Tech Memo

% farmers/private landowners in watershed applying BMPs. Other (Number of participants completed the training)

MANAGING FRESHWATER INFLOWS TO ESTUARIES

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY FOR NORTH AMERICA, 2016 UPDATE

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation BSK Associates Vancouver

SUTTER COUNTY. General Plan Update Technical Background Report

Karuah Hard Rock Quarry. Summary of Environmental Monitoring Data

City and County of San Francisco

Blue Earth River Basin Fecal Coliform TMDL Study

Mud Creek and West Mud Creek

INVESTIGATION OF NONPOINT POLLUTION SOURCES IMPACTING SHELLFISH GROWING AREAS IN TOMALES BAY,

U-Park Wyatt Street Temporary Event Space

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

E. coli and Coliform Bacteria Levels of Edgewood s Watershed Katie Schneider and Leslie Reed

Evaluation copy. Fecal Coliform. Computer INTRODUCTION

REGULATION On application of Discount coefficients to the Airport charges to be collected at Boryspil International Airport

GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE

BUCK POINT RANCH. Aspen Associates Realty

1.0 INTRODUCTION METHODS REACH DESIGNATIONS CHUCKANUT CREEK SMA Watershed Analysis 9

Asset Manager s Report to the DRA Board

Arrowhead Ranch. Located in the Big Range Country of Central Wyoming.

To all our cooperators from across California. be they ranchers, growers, or regulators, activists, resource managers, and the public THANK YOU!

EU GPP CRITERIA FOR INDOOR CLEANING SERVICES 1. INTRODUCTION

DATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America. RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project

Waukegan & Calumet Rivers. All Hands Meeting

Final Drainage Letter Pikes Peak Community College Downtown Parking Lot Colorado Springs, Colorado

Plans and Design Calculations for the Alder Creek Diversion Fish Screen

Revealed Preference Methods

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Transcription:

To: WRIA 35 Planning Committee Memo From: Jory Oppenheimer and Kari Vigerstol Project: WRIA 35 Level II Water Quality CC: Ben Floyd, HDR/EES; John Koreny, HDR/EES Date: March 10, 2005 Job No: 22592 RE: PATAHA CREEK FECAL COLIFORM COMPLIANCE WITH WATER QUALITY STANDARDS This technical memorandum addresses fecal coliform in Pataha Creek based on our review of existing data and water quality standards. The purpose of this assessment was to determine whether the recent fecal coliform data collected in Pataha Creek exceeded water quality standards. The main topics addressed in this memorandum include: Summary of the existing monitoring program and data Fecal coliform standards for Pataha Creek Basis for 303(d) listing of Pataha Creek Results of the assessment of existing fecal coliform data Conclusions Recommendations PATAHA CREEK PROJECT STUDY AREA The Pataha Creek watershed is about 115,000 acres located in Garfield and Columbia Counties. The upper elevation of the watershed is 5,600 feet. The elevation at the mouth of the creek is at an elevation of 800 feet (HDR/EES 2005). Major tributaries of Pataha Creek include Dry Pataha Creek, Sweeney Gulch, Balmaier Gulch, Tatman Gulch, and Dry Hollow. Agricultural production is the primary land use in the Pataha Creek subbasin. Agricultural includes pasture, grains, hay and livestock production (HDR/EES 2005). Major non-irrigated crops include winter wheat, spring grain, peas, and bluegrass seed, while irrigated agriculture occurring in the bottomlands along Pataha Creek includes hay, small grains, and rotation pasture. In the furthest upstream sections of the subbasin forest is the major land cover. The City of Pomeroy, with a population of just over 1500 people, is located on Pataha Creek in the northeastern area of the subbasin (Figure 1). EXISTING MONITORING PROGRAMS DATASETS Table 1 summarizes the water quality monitoring programs that have sampled for fecal coliform in Pataha Creek and its tributaries. The monitoring stations are shown in Figure 2. The Washington Department of Ecology has two sites, one on the lower section of Pataha Creek at Archer Road and another in the upper portion of the watershed on Pataha Creek at Rosy Grade Page 1 of 9

Page 2 of 9

Page 3 of 9

(DOE 2005). Each site was sampled monthly for various water quality parameters in two separate water years, the first site in 1997 and the second in 2002. Washington State University (WSU) began water quality sampling and spot flow sampling at several sites in the Pataha Creek subbasin in 1998 (HDR/EES 2005). From 1998 to 2001 sampling sites Sampling was conducted at three sites on Pataha Creek from 1998 to 2001. Two samples a month were taken at each site and testing parameters include temperature, total suspended solids, fecal coliform, dissolved oxygen, and ph. Table 1. Summary of Existing and Past Water Quality Monitoring Programs in Pataha Creek and its Tributaries Stations Agency Period of record Location 35F070 Ecology 1997 Pataha Creek at Archer Rd 35F110 Ecology 2002 Pataha Creek at Rosy Grade Pataha 1 WSU 1998-2001, 2003-2004 Pataha Creek below Dry Hollow confluence Pataha 3 WSU 1998-2002, 2003-2004 Pataha Creek at Marengo Pataha 4 WSU 1998-2001, 2003-2004 Pataha Creek upstream of Sweeney Gulch confluence Pataha 5 WSU 1998-2001, 2003-2004 Pataha Creek near Columbia Center FECAL COLIFORM STANDARDS FOR PATAHA CREEK The Surface Water Quality Standards for Washington State designate Asotin Creek as a Class A (excellent) waterbody (WAC 173-201A) 1. The fecal coliform standards for Class A waters includes two parts 2. The first part, a geometric mean, is similar to an average. The standards are based on the geometric mean of all the samples collected over a year (or season). The water quality standard for Class A waters is less than 100 colony forming units (cfu)/100 ml for the geometric mean of all the samples collected. The second part of the fecal coliform standard requires that 10 percent of the samples collected over the year (or season) are less 200 cfu/100 ml. For example, if 10 samples are collected during a year, not more than one sample should be above 200 cfu/100 ml.. 1 This 1997 version of the surface water quality standards was revised in 2003 by Ecology. However, the 2003 version is currently under review by EPA. The fecal coliform criteria are the same for both versions of the standards 2 As stated in the 1997 version of the Surface Water Standards (WAC 173-201A) for Class A waters - Fecal coliform organism levels shall both not exceed a geometric mean value of 100 colonies/100 ml, and not have more than 10 percent of all samples obtained for calculating the geometric mean value exceeding 200 colonies/100 ml. Page 4 of 9

BASIS FOR 303(d) LISTING Pataha Creek is listed as an impaired water body for fecal coliform on Ecology s 1998 and 2002/2004 303(d) lists. The rationale for the 303(d) listing of Asotin Creek is summarized in Table 2. The 303(d) listing prepared in 1998 is the most current approved by EPA. Ecology will likely submit a revised 303(d) list (2002/2004) to EPA for approval as part of the 303(d) program under the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act in April 2005 (Ken Koch, Ecology, personal communication, 2005). Stream Segment ID# BT00LT BT00LT Table 2 Rationale for 303d Listing for Pataha Creek Basis for Listing 1998 303(d) List Cusimano, 1992, 2 excursions beyond the upper criterion on 10/15/91 and 10/16/91 at RM 22.9 (150ft below Pomeroy WWTP outfall). Data collected by Umatilla National Forest (submitted by Jeff Blackwood on 10/29/97) show 1 excursions beyond the lower criterion (geometric mean from 12 samples collected at RM 23 ) during 10/97. 2002/2004 303(d) List 16797 Geometric mean of 128 and 50% of samples exceeds the percentile criterion from 8 samples collected in 1997 Station 35F070 (Pataha Ck at Archer Road) Ecology. 40550 WSU (2001) show excursions beyond the geometric mean criterion in 1999 and 2000 at Station PAT 3 (SR 12 at Marengo Road Bridge). 40551 WSU (2001) show excursions beyond the geometric mean criterion in 1999 and 2000 at Station PAT 4 (Upstream of Sweeny Gulch confluence) 40548 WSU (2001) show excursions beyond the geometric mean criterion in 1999 at Station PAT 1 (SR 261 @ Delaney) 40549 WSU (2001) show excursions beyond the geometric mean criterion in 1999 and 2000 at Station PAT 2 (SR 12 at Dodge Junction) 42532 Hallock (2004) Dept of Ecology ambient monitoring station 35F110 shows 2 of 9 samples (22.2%) in year 2002 exceeded the percentile criterion. Source: Ecology s 303(d) List web page Page 5 of 9

RESULTS Comparison with Fecal Coliform Standards Figures 3 and 4 compare the fecal coliform concentrations measured in Pataha Creek between 1997 and 2004, with the fecal coliform geometric mean and percentile criteria. Figures 3 and 4 indicate the recent data (collected in 2004) meet the geometric mean criterion, but not all stations comply with the percentile criterion. These data also indicate that the proportion (percentiles) of samples above 200 cfu/100 ml have decreased compared with the data used to place Pataha Creek on the 303(d) list. 450 400 350 300 Pat 1 Pat 3 Pat 4 Pat 5 DOE 35F110 DOE 35F070 col/100 ml 250 200 150 Geometric mean criterion 100 50 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 water year Figure 3 Comparison with geometric mean fecal coliform criterion for Pataha Creek stations Table 3 summarizes compliance with the fecal coliform standards for the Pataha Creek stations based on the data collected between 1997 and 2004. The table indicates that there were fewer exceedences of the standards in 2004, but fecal concentrations are still above the state standards two of the four Pataha Creek stations. Page 6 of 9

Percent of samples collected over 200 cfu/100 ml 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Percentile Criterion Pat 1 Pat 3 Pat 4 Pat 5 DOE 35F110 DOE 35F070 0% 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 water year Figure 4 Comparison with the fecal coliform percentile criterion for the Pataha Creek stations Page 7 of 9

WQ Criteria Table 3 Summary of fecal coliform compliance within Pataha Creek 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002 2004 DOE DOE 35F070 1* 3 4 5 1 3 4 5 1 3 4 5 35F11 1 3 4 5 0 Geo Mean< 100 cfu/100 ml X X X X X X X X X <10% samples at 200 cfu/100 ml X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X *1 = Pat 1, 3 = Pat 3, 4 = Pat 4, 5 = Pat 5, Legend: X = exceeds criteria = meets criteria Page 8 of 9

CONCLUSIONS The results of our review of existing fecal coliform data and standards indicate that: Fecal coliform data collected in Pataha Creek in 2001 and 2004 had lower concentrations than previous years. In 2004, all four stations had geometric means below the Class A fecal coliform criteria of 100 cfu/100 ml. Fecal coliform standards are still not being met at in Pataha Creek, because two of the four stations exceeded the percentile criterion of not more than 10 percent of the samples with fecal coliform concentrations greater than 200 cfu/100 ml. RECOMMENDATIONS Submit the 2004 data to Ecology for the 2006 303(d) List. Although not all stations currently comply with the fecal coliform standards, the recent data indicate that two of the four segments now comply with fecal coliform standards. In addition to assessing waterbodies for the 2006 303(d), Ecology will begin scoping for total maximum daily load (TMDL) studies in WRIA 35 this fall. Continue water quality improvement projects to bring fecal coliform levels in compliance in Pataha Creek. Levels of fecal coliform in the last two years of monitoring conducted by WSU (2001 and 2004), compared with the earlier years monitored by WSU (1999 and 2000). Continue fecal coliform monitoring at the mainstem Pataha Creek to verify the trend of declining fecal coliform levels and develop the data for future 303(d) lists. REFERENCES Ecology. 2005. 2002/2004 303(d) web page: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/303d/index.html Ecology 2002. Water Quality Program Policy 1-11. September 2002. Koch, Ken, Ecology (personal communication). Page 9 of 9