Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport

Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport 2004 FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study and Master Plan Study Update Planning Advisory Committee January 21, 2004 1

Planning Advisory Committee Introductions 2

Planning Advisory Committee Kenton County Airport Board and Staff Landrum & Brown Team Planning Advisory Committee Members 3

Planning Advisory Committee CVG: The Big Picture 4

Planning Advisory Committee What is the Role of the Planning Advisory Committee? 5

Role of the PAC Sounding Board Link to the Community Reviewer Aid to Implementation 6

Planning Advisory Committee What is a Part 150 Study? 7

What Is FAR Part 150? Voluntary program aimed at balancing an airport s operational needs and its impacts on the surrounding communities Regulatory History Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 150 Yearly day-night average sound level (DNL) Sets the Integrated Noise Model (INM) as the FAA s standard noise modeling methodology Provides for the voluntary development of Noise Exposure Maps and a Noise Compatibility Program by airport operators 8

Purpose of FAR Part 150 Assist airport operators in assessing noise impacts and developing a balanced response that: Prepares a plan to reduce aircraft noise impacts Mitigates noise impacts caused by aviation activities Protects the National Aviation System by resolving conflicts at local levels Enables the airport to become eligible to apply for FAA funding assistance for program implementation 9

Study Description Develop Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) for existing and future (5-year) conditions Develop a Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) to reduce aircraft noise impact on receivers Implement the NCP through: KCAB applies for funding of approved NCP measures Local jurisdictions adopt land use measures FAA ATC implement approved operational changes 10

Part 150 Process Study Initiation Data Collection Forecast Validation ARTS Analysis Existing Noise Exposure Future Noise Exposure Noise Abatement Alternatives Land Use Management Alternatives Noise Abatement Plan Implementation Plan Land Use Management Plan Draft Noise Compatibility Program Draft Documents and Public Hearings Recommended Noise Compatibility Program Review and Approval 11

Land Use Compatibility Guidelines 12

What Defines a Successful Part 150 Study Noise impacts are minimized Constructive input provided by PAC members Meaningful public dialogue Increased public awareness Improved community and KCAB relationships All viable solutions examined Balanced plan to meet aviation and neighborhood needs 13

What Defines a Successful Part 150 Study National Aviation System not compromised Previous NCP goals maintained or enhanced Community agreement obtained FAA Record of Approval issued in 180 days - all measures approved Community committed to implement land use measures 14

Planning Advisory Committee Why is the KCAB Conducting Another Part 150 Study? 15

Current Noise Abatement Measures 1999 Noise Compatibility Plan includes 32 measures to abate or minimize noise impacts Noise abatement measures from the 1999 NCP can be grouped into two primary categories: Flight Track Locations and Runway Use Program Flight Track Location measures developed consistent corridors and turn points for large jet aircraft Apply to jet aircraft weighing over 70,000 pounds does not include regional jets or propeller aircraft In effect 24 hours a day Daytime Runway Use Program designates south flow as preferred flow with Runway 27 preferred for departures 16

Existing Flight Corridors 17

History of Nighttime Runway Use Program Developed in 1992 as a measure to minimize the impact of nighttime cargo operations Fully implemented in 1996 after westward extension to Runway 9/27 Designed for distinct operational flows Arrivals 10:00 p.m. - 2:00 a.m. Departures 4:00 a.m. - 7:00 a.m. Arrivals Step-Down Departure Step-Down Rwy 9 Rwy 27 Rwy 27 Rwy 36L Rwy 36L Rwy 9 Rwy 18 Rwy 18R 18

History of Nighttime Runway Use Program Focused as much nighttime noise to the west of the airport; Gave preference to departing aircraft Extension of Runway 9/27 provided daytime noise benefits by allowing Runway 27 to be used more for daytime departures Coupled with the land use mitigation program, it successfully reduced the number of people affected by nighttime flights Arrivals Step-Down Departure Step-Down Rwy 9 Rwy 27 Rwy 27 Rwy 36L Rwy 36L Rwy 9 Rwy 18 Rwy 18R 19

Why is KCAB conducting a Part 150 Study now? Part 150 Regulations call for updating a Part 150 study every five years or when changes have occurred in operating conditions. Changes in operating conditions: Increased night/morning flights by Delta and Comair (10:00 p.m. - Midnight and 5:30 a.m. - 7:00 a.m.) Increased activity by check haulers Midnight operation increased 91% from 1999 to 2003 Changes in DHL scheduled activity (earlier start and later stop times) Take fresh look at all of the measures, in particular, nighttime runway use program. 20

Defining the Problem Existing Operations 10:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. Existing Operations 4:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. 30 30 30 30 Not enough simultaneous arrival and departure capacity Need 40 departures Capacity is 30 Need 45 arrivals Capacity is 30 Not enough simultaneous arrival and departure capacity Need 70 departures Capacity is 30 Need 15 arrivals Capacity is 30 21

FAA Initiated Operational Tests As a result of increased operations, reduced efficiency, and safety concerns, the FAA initiated a series of tests Test #1: January 27 April 21, 2003 Nighttime runway use program modified: The time the runway use is program is in effect changed from 10:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. Arrivals Step-Down Departure Step-Down Approved Test Approved Test Rwy 9 9 Rwy 27 27 Rwy 27 18R Rwy 36L 36L Rwy 36L 36L Rwy 9 18R Rwy 18R 27 Rwy 18R 9 22

Test #1 Results Operational Results (10:00 p.m. - 2:00 a.m.) - Between 10:00 p.m. and Midnight, arrivals used the parallel runways, resulting in increased capacity (primarily Comair) - Small increase in use of Runway 9 for cargo arrivals after Midnight - No notable change in departures (Runway 27) Operational Results (4:00 a.m. - 7:00 a.m.) - The few arrivals that occurred during this time frame used the parallel runways - Increased departure throughput on Runway 27 to the west between 4:00 a.m. - 5:00 a.m. 23

Test #1 Results Noise Results vs Annual Noise Contour (ANC) Test contour similar in size to the 2002 ANC with slight increases north and south of the airport Differences due primarily to arrival runway use 10:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. Largest area of growth is south of Runway 18R/36L (increase in arrivals) 28 unmitigated homes (not in current mitigation program) would be located in the Test contour General finding -- noise levels would increase north and south of the airport Increase in contours is due mostly to the 10dB night penalty 24

& & & & & & Williams Road C-50 Tanners Road C-55 Bender Road N-7 N-9 C-58 N-4 S-4 N-1 Æc C-46 L-3 Fol ey Ro C-78 S-27 A L-5 Æc C-80 C-79 Idlewild Road Petersburg Road 20 C-3 Graves Road C-37 237 Elijah Creek Road C-47 River Road 8 KENTUCKY Petersburg Road C-9 Ohio River 50 River Road Hillside Avenue OHIO C-16 Hamilton County C-82 C-87 S Liz-Mark Road North Bend Road Æc L-1 C-39 Limaburg Road C-49 20 C-38 S-8 S-7 S-1 S-11 Conner Road C-36 18R 212 18L C-86 Boone County Kenton County S-40 Happy Jack Hollow Easton Lane Akin Lane Legend East Bend Road Idlewil d Road 2002 Annual Noise Contour 2002 Nighttime Test Noise Contour Residential Land Use Compatible Land Use 338 Airport Property 2002 Nighttime Noise Test Compared to 2002 Annual Noise Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport N-6 DRAFT 338 Bullitsville Road C-14 C-21 C-4 C-61 C-5 S-3 C-6 NOT TO SCALE Exhibit: 1 ; Camp Ernst Road 10/14 /03 Prepared by Landrum & Brown Contour: 2002 baseline night nois e.dxf Filename: P:\ CVG\ Nighttime Noise Tests\gis\Nighttime_tests_color.apr N C-23 C-99 S-13 Camp Ernst Road S-23 C-51 C-19 237 Pleasant Valley Road C-28 9 H ossman Road 75 DNL 70 DNL 65 DNL Burl ington Pike C-8 36L 18 C-31 C-88 C-89 C-90 C-35 C-11 C-26 N-3 C-41 Mall Road 27 Houston Road Florence 36R N-11 C-7 Turf way Road 842 236 S-44 C-17 Ñ C-57 C-59 C-32 S-10 N-8 N-2 C-29 C-27 C-40 C-30 S-12 C-54 S-22 S-2 Æc Donaldson Highway H-1 N-5 Turf way Road S-24 S-18 C-31 C-15 L-2 S-50 S-51 C-56 C-45 C- 20 C-42 C-83 C-48 25 S-6 S-46 Dixie Highway S-41 C-98 S-42 S-43 C-95 S-47 S-45 C-97 C-93 S-44 C-9 C-94 Er S-48

FAA Tests and the Part 150 Test 2 and 3 are complete and will be evaluated in the Part 150 Study Test 4 is ongoing and Test 5 has been requested (February 2004) The Part 150 will evaluate all FAA tests, as well as develop new alternatives for increasing operational efficiency while continuing to minimize noise impacts Changes to the current program would require an environmental review (EA/EIS) 26

Future Operating Conditions Part 150 guidelines recommend planning five years into the future The current nighttime runway use program is expected to become impractical as the following occurs: Continued growth in operations by Delta/Comair - 10:00 p.m. to Midnight and early morning Continued growth of night check hauler operations Potential growth of DHL operations 27

How the Part 150 will evaluate the effects of a changing DHL operation The Part 150 Study will begin with three scenarios relative to the unknown future of DHL at CVG DHL experiences normal growth as they have in the past DHL combines the Wilmington, Ohio and CVG hub at CVG (potential of tripling number of DHL operations) DHL relocates the CVG hub to Wilmington or elsewhere Alternatives will be developed for each scenario until DHL makes a decision during the Part 150 Study. At that time, one scenario will be carried forward for use in the development of the NCP. If DHL makes a decision during the Part 150 Study, that scenario will be carried forward for use in the development of the Noise Compatibility Program for CVG. 28

0 4000 Feet & & & & & & Approved 1999 NCP Land Use Measures LU-12 Sound Insulate 65-70 DNL Western Contour Ashby Fork Road Idlewild Road Liz-Mark Road ', I-275 Petersburg Road LU-4 Voluntary Acquisition 70-75 DNL Western Contour 65 DNL Happy Jack Hollow Akin Lane 20 ms Road C-3 Graves Road C-37 KENTUCKY LU-16 Sound Insulate Orchard Estates Subdivision 70 DNL North Bend Road 75 DNL T ', 237 LU-13 Voluntary Acquisition Northwest Program 65-70 DNL 18R/36L I-275 Limaburg Road Elijah Creek Road C-49 20C-38 C-47 S-11 C-39 S-7 L-1 Æc S-8 Conner Road 9 C-36 Hossman Road River Road 18R 8 Petersburg Road 212 27 C-9 18L C-58 Æc LU-1 L-3 C-46 Voluntary Acquisition 1,700' x 8,000' Boxes OHIO Hillside Avenue 50 River Road Ohio River LU-5 Voluntary Hamilton County Acquisition C-16 Rolling Green Acres, O'Hara Road, Turfway Road C-86 Boone County Kenton County C-83 C-80 S-4 Ñ Æc Legend School Church Nursing Home Hospital Library Residential Land Use Compatible Land Use State Boundary Airport Boundary 1999 NCP Noise Contour Record of Approval was issued by the FAA on December 5, 2000. FAR Part 150 Study Update Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport Easton Lane LU-9 LU-10 Measures Withdrawn LU-8 Voluntary Acquisition Ethan's Glen Undeveloped, Approved Building Lots LU-7 Sound Insulate Eligible Schools East Bend Road 7/5 /20 01 Prepared by Landrum & Brown Con tou r: 99 ncp 02 Filena me : P:\ CVG_ 98 \cvg gis \ar cview\p rj\ eis\b&w 99 NC P Mit Alt.apr Idlewild Road 338 ; N Bullitsville Road N-6 338 S-3 C-21 LU-15 C-4 Sound Insulate C-6 Deerfield C-5 Subdivision C-61 LU-17 Sound Insulate Eligible Churches Camp Ernst Road S-23 S-13 C-99 36L I-75 LU-14 C-28 C-15 H-1 Sound Insulate LU-3 S Ñ Dartmouth Woods Voluntary C-42 842 C-8 S-46 C-23 Subdivision C-31 Acquisition 75 DNL 18C-35 C-48 N-5 C-95 C-51 N-11 S-2 S-47 C-31 C-57 C-26 C-32 C-59 S-10 C-88 C-41 N-8 N-2 C-89 C-29 C-27 S-12 C-30 237 S-22 C-40 C-19 N-3 Æc Els C-11 L-2 Exhibit: 1999 Noise Compatibility Program C-43 Land Use Mitigation Florence S-62-7 C-12 S-18 Camp Ernst Road Pleasant Valley Road Burlington Pike Mall Road Houston Road 36R S-50 C-7 Turfway Road 236 S-51 Donaldson Highway C-17 C-56 C-45 ', Turfway Road ', I-71 Dixie Highway S C S- 29

KCAB Expenditures to Date Noise Compatibility Programs Voluntary Acquisition $53 Million, 383 houses, 70 lots Purchase Assurance $12 Million Net Costs, 301 houses, 13 lots Residential Sound Insulation $9 Million, 424 houses Woodspoint Sound Insulation $500,000 Boone County H.S. and Conner Middle $3 Million AOMS $700,000 Approximately $78 Million in Total 30

White Oak White West Oak West White Oak White East Oak East Dent Dent Grandview Grandview Monfort Heights East Monfort Heights East Hidden Valley Hidden Valley Mack North Mack North Cleves Cleves North Bend North Bend Bridgetown Bridgetown North North Park Sayler Park Sayler Lawrenceburg Lawrenceburg $ $ Aurora Aurora Covedale Covedale $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ B Burlington Burlington Florence Florence Oakbrook Oakbrook $ $ Union Union Villa Hills Villa Hills Fort Mitchell Fort Mitchell Erlanger Erlanger $ $ Ñ Ñ Elsmere $ Elsmere $ Lakeside Park Lakeside Park Fort Wright Fort Wright Covington Covington Crestview Hills Crestview Hills Edgewood Edgewood Taylor Mill Taylor Mill Fairview Fairview Newport Newport Bromley Bromley Park Hills Park Hills B Ludlow Ludlow Airport Environs Cincinnati Cincinnati $ $ St. Bernard St. Bernard $Cheviot $Cheviot Mack South Mack South Addyston Addyston Greendale Greendale Rising Sun Rising Sun Elmwood Place Elmwood Place Monfort Heights Monfort SouthHeights South Latonia Lakes Latonia Lakes Independence Independence 11000 11000 00 11000 11000 Feet Feet 31 << N N

Planning Advisory Committee What is an Airport Master Plan? 32

A Master Plan Provides a road map for efficiently meeting aviation demand through the foreseeable future while preserving the flexibility necessary to respond to changing industry conditions. Provides a framework for long-range planning (2025) Graphically presents preferred airport development concept Defines the purpose and need for development projects 33

A Master Plan Complies with FAA requirements Enables the airport to achieve its mission Assures compatible land use development Supports the financial health of the region s most powerful economic engine Identifies facility requirements for all airport users - airlines, cargo, general aviation and travelers 34

Master Plan Components Terminal Area Master Plan Define Strategic Objectives Inventory Forecast Demand/Capacity Facility Requirements Development Alternatives Implementation Plan ALP Plans Package Environmental Overview Public Coordination Stakeholder Coordination Agency Coordination 35

Existing Airport 36

The CVG 2030 Terminal Area Master Plan A Flexible Plan for a Dynamic Marketplace Consolidated Rental Car Facility Improved access from I-275 Flex-gate Concourse D Expanded Terminal 3 Expanded security checkpoint Terminal area commercial development zone Long term people mover and connection to light rail system 37

The Master Plan Assuring balance to meet long term objectives 38

Definition of a Successful Plan Financially feasible the phasing of capital projects is aligned with the ability to secure available funding Environmentally compatible minimizes potential environmental impacts Balanced maintains a balance between airport development needs and community impacts Technically sound complies with Federal, State, and local requirements and it can be constructed efficiently and cost effectively Responsive addresses the physical and operational needs of all stakeholders Visionary considers changes in industry dynamics which will enable CVG to remain one of the world s most user-friendly airports 39

Planning Advisory Committee Why is the Airport Preparing a Master Plan Update? 40

Changes Since Last Master Plan Major growth and development in region Regional population expected to increase by 20 percent during study period (2003-2025) Boone County had the most new housing building permits in Northern Kentucky in 2003 Continued increase in operations Aircraft operations have increased at an average of 5 percent per year (1991-2002) Increased regional jet activity 41

900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Aircraft Operations TAMP 2030 Operations Forecast 42 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 Year Actual TAMP 2010 2020 2030 Operations

Changes Since Last Master Plan Heightened Security Requirements Industry consolidation of airport hubs Formation of airline alliances Focus on airport financial viability Growth of DHL operation Operation of new facility Continued increase in cargo activity 43

Planning & Development Issues Air Traffic Control technology Balance airside/landside/terminal capacity Roadway access Perimeter taxiways Commercial development Deicing/snow melting Perimeter security Cargo development Taxiway improvements New Large Aircraft (A-380) Airport vision Security threat assessment Customer service FedEx distribution center Runway construction ASR relocation Ground Runup Enclosure Off site check in Multimodal 2 nd control tower 44

Planning Advisory Committee Coordinated Part 150 and Master Plan Process 45

Coordinated Part 150 & Master Plan Process Stakeholder Coordination Master Plan Inventory Update Demand / Capacity & Facility Requirements Develop / Evaluate Alternatives Select / Evaluate Master Plan Master Plan Report / ALP Overall Strategy Session Forecast and Baseline Operations Financial Feasibility Part 150 Data Collection Existing & Future Noise Exposure Noise and Land Use Alternatives NCP Part 150 Report Public Coordination 46

DRAFT Schedule 2003 2004 2005 Part150Study TASK Data Collection/Forecasts Prepare NEMs Alternatives Analysis NCP Documents FAA Review - 180 Days/ROA Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Draft Final Public Public Advisory Committee Mtgs Public Workshops/Hearing Inventory and Existing Conditions Master Plan Aviation Activity and Demand Forecasts Facility Requirements Concept Development and Alternatives Analysis Master Plan Report Draft Final FAA Review and Approval Note: This generalized project schedule is subject to change based upon coordination between the Airport and the consultant team. 1/8/04 47

Planning Advisory Committee Overview of Project Meetings 48

March/April 2004 Meetings PAC Meeting #2 Workshop #1 Baseline Noise Exposure and Impacts Noise Abatement and Land Use Strategies Baseline Forecast Results June/July 2004 PAC Meeting #3 Noise Abatement Alternatives Land Use Mitigation Alternatives Master Plan Facility Requirements 49

Meetings August/September 2004 PAC Meeting #4 Workshop #3 Preliminary NCP Master Plan Alternatives November 2004 PAC Meeting #5 Workshop #4 Public Hearing Recommended NCP Master Plan Alternatives Refinement 50

Planning Advisory Committee Next Steps 51

Next Steps Prepare Baseline Noise Contours 2004/2010 Identify Baseline Noise Impacts Outline Noise Abatement Strategies Outline Land Use Strategies Complete Baseline Aviation Forecast Define Master Plan Goals and Objectives Complete Master Plan Data Collection 52