MERRIMACK VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MVRTA) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE

Similar documents
PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Performance Measures Year End Updated-

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

ATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Bus Operations Report

Sound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office

Board Box. February Item # Item Staff Page 1. Key Performance Indicators M. Thompson Financial Report for Dec H.

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations January 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

Board of Directors Information Summary

Sound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations February 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

Operational Performance

VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018

Board Box. October Item # Item Staff Page 1. Key Performance Indicators Sep 2018 M. Mungia Financial Report Aug 2018 H.

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

METRO OPERATIONS COMMITTEE

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

Manual vs. Automatic Operation and Operational Restrictions

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

(This page intentionally left blank.)

ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA

With the completion of this project, we would like to follow-up on the projections as well as highlight a few other items:

Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager

Scorecard Key Performance Indicators

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

December 2018 Monthly Performance Report

Managing And Understand The Impact Of Of The Air Air Traffic System: United Airline s Perspective

Swedish Service Routes, American Style: Local Bus for the Suburbs 70TH ANNUAL OHIO TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE OCTOBER 25, 2016

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Creating Sustainable Communities Through Public Transportation

RTD s Performance Management System

Sacramento Convention Center City Team & Stakeholder Group Meeting

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

BaltimoreLink Implementation Status Report

PUBLIC NOTICE The Greater Boise Auditorium District will hold a Regular Board Meeting on Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 2 p.m. Boise Centre West Room

Bristol Virginia Transit

2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report. Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

TOURISM PERFORMANCE 2017

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com

Executive Summary. Introduction. Community Assessment

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Orange County Transportation Authority Fare Integration Project A Regional Approach

Demand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM

APPENDIX 2 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION SERVICE STANDARDS AND DECISION RULES FOR PLANNING TRANSIT SERVICE

To ensure the sustainable provision of safe, reliable, friendly and efficient passenger and cargo shipping services for the residents of Sark and

Alberta Tourism Market Monitor

SUB-REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

Annual Route Report Operating Data. Prepared for: Board of Directors. Final 4/26/2018

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Greater Portland Transit District

MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017

ADA PARATRANSIT PLAN. Twin Cities Area Transportation Authority 275 East Wall Benton Harbor, MI 49022

Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report. 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report

Montgomery Area Paratransit Guide

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

OCTA s ACCESS Service The Way to Go!!!!

Nancy Graham Director, Air Navigation Bureau, ICAO

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018

All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3

Leveraging One Boeing

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

Passenger: 17.2 Million (+3.9% yoy) OTP: 85.8% SLF: 73.3% Subsidiaries Operating Revenues US$415.2 Million Cargo Carried 219.4K ton (+10.

MONTHLY REPORT AUGUST 2017

SOUTH WEST. annual report. May 2011 to April

P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Transportation Standing Committee October 25, 2018

Optimized Maintenance Program (OMP)

YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

North Central Regional Transit District. Quick Facts. Our Mission Statement:

TRI-COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FOR SENIORS AND/OR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTS

COLTS Complementary ADA Paratransit Service. Special Efforts Accessibility Transportation Service (SEATS) SEATS Trip Tips (570)

Transit in Toronto. Chair Adam Giambrone Sunday, October

Factors that Affect Fixed-Route Ridership Frequency Connections and accessibility Travel time Travel cost Service area coverage Reliability

Service Recommendation Plan. June 2018

Ramsay Health Care Limited Results Briefing Half Year ended 31 December 2018

Transcription:

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE IT IS OUR GOAL TO IMPROVE FIXED ROUTE SERVICE ON ALL LEVELS, ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS. IN ORDER TO DO THIS, WE HAVE ESTABLISHED BENCHMARKS TO MEASURE PERFORMANCE. THIS INFORMATION THEN ALLOWS IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE AND SATISFACTORY LEVELS OF SERVICE TO BE MAINTAINED. THE FOLLOWING AREAS WILL BE MONITORED THROUGH FY19: ON-TIME PERFORMANCE, VALID COMPLAINTS, PREVENTABLE ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 MILES, MILES BETWEEN ROAD CALLS, PASSENGERS PER REVENUE MILE AND REVENUE HOUR, AND MAINTENANCE COST PER REVENUE MILE AND REVENUE HOUR. ON TIME PERFORMANCE OCT 2018: 60% NOV 2018: 62% VALID COMPLAINTS OCT 2018: 8.00 NOV 2018: 3.00 On-time performance is used to assess reliability of the services we provide. A trip is considered on-time when the vehicle leaves its origin on-time and arrives at its destination within 5-minutes of the scheduled time. (Please note: If a vehicle leaves early, it is not considered on-time.) We recently began using a new on time performance measuring tool called the Swiftly Transit Dashboard. This new method (implemented November 2017) actually provides on time performance for all routes and for all time points in real-time, even when a bus is stuck in traffic. The end result is a lowering of the calculated averages used to determine system on time performance. Over time we will use this new tool to adjust bus route running times, where needed, to improve on time performance. A new benchmark will be established as more data becomes available. Valid complaints are used to assess the level of customer service that we provide. It is our objective to decrease the number of valid complaints below the current benchmark of 2.72.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE PREVENTABLE ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 MILES OCT 2018: 2.47 NOV 2018: 4.28 Preventable accidents are used to measure safety. An accident is considered preventable when the operator has failed to do everything reasonable to prevent the accident. It is our objective to remain below the benchmark of 2.04 preventable accidents per 100,000 miles. MILES BETWEEN ROADCALLS Miles between road calls are used to assess dependability. It is our objective to exceed the benchmark of 23,045 miles by increasing the miles between road calls. OCT 2018: 15,194 NOV 2018: 38,956

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE PASSENGERS PER REVENUE MILE OCT 2018: 1.48 NOV 2018: 1.35 Passengers per revenue mile are used to measure system productivity and its effectiveness of service provided. The more passengers transported per revenue mile, the more efficient the service. It is our objective to exceed the benchmark of 1.52 passengers per revenue mile. PASSENGERS PER REVENUE HOUR Passengers per revenue hour are used similarly to passengers per revenue mile. It is used to measure system productivity and its effectiveness of service provided. The more passengers transported per revenue hour, the more efficient the service. OCT 2018: 16.46 NOV 2018: 14.97 It is our objective to exceed the benchmark of 16.70 passengers per revenue hour.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE MAINTENANCE COST PER REVENUE MILE Maintenance cost per revenue mile is used to measure cost efficiency of maintaining vehicles and the effectiveness of our maintenance program. The lower the cost per revenue mile, the more effective the preventative maintenance program. OCT 2018: $1.01 NOV 2018: $0.88 It is our objective to reduce our maintenance cost per revenue mile below the benchmark of $0.77. MAINTENANCE COST PER REVENUE HOUR OCT 2018: $11.18 NOV 2018: $9.80 Like the maintenance cost per revenue mile, Maintenance cost per revenue hour is used to measure cost efficiency of maintaining vehicles and the effectiveness of our maintenance program. The lower the cost per revenue hour, the more effective the preventative maintenance program. It is our objective to reduce our maintenance cost per revenue hour below the benchmark of $8.42.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: PARATRANSIT IT IS OUR GOAL TO IMPROVE PARATRANSIT SERVICE ON ALL LEVELS, ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS. IN ORDER TO DO THIS, WE HAVE ESTABLISHED BENCHMARKS TO MEASURE PERFORMANCE. THIS INFORMATION THEN ALLOWS IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE AND SATISFACTORY LEVELS OF SERVICE TO BE MAINTAINED. THE FOLLOWING AREAS WILL BE MONITORED THROUGH FY19: ON-TIME PERFORMANCE, VALID COMPLAINTS, PREVENTABLE ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 MILES, MILES BETWEEN ROAD CALLS, PASSENGERS PER REVENUE MILE AND REVENUE HOUR, AND MAINTENANCE COST PER REVENUE MILE AND REVENUE HOUR. ON TIME PERFORMANCE OCT 2018: 92% NOV 2018: 94% On-time performance is used to assess reliability of the services we provide. A trip is considered on-time when the vehicle arrives within the pick-up window of 15 minutes before or after the scheduled time. It is our objective to maintain and/or exceed the benchmark of 97% of all trips performed on time. VALID COMPLAINTS OCT 2018: 0.00 NOV 2018: 1.00 Valid complaints are used to assess the level of customer service that we provide. It is our objective to keep the number of valid complaints below the current benchmark of 1.00.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: PARATRANSIT PREVENTABLE ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 MILES OCT 2018: 3.00 NOV 2018: 2.00 Preventable accidents are used to measure safety. An accident is considered preventable when the operator has failed to do everything reasonable to prevent the accident. It is our objective to remain below the benchmark of 1.50 preventable accidents per 100,000 miles. MILES BETWEEN ROADCALLS OCT 2018: 79,435 NOV 2018: 36,017 Miles between road calls are used to measure dependability. It is our objective to exceed the benchmark of 48,378 miles by increasing the miles between road calls.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: PARATRANSIT PASSENGERS PER REVENUE MILE Passengers per revenue mile are used to measure system productivity and its effectiveness of service provided. The more passengers transported per revenue mile, the more efficient the service. OCT 2018: 0.10 NOV 2018: 0.11 It is our objective to exceed the benchmark of 0.12 passengers per revenue mile. PASSENGERS PER REVENUE HOUR OCT 2018: 1.78 NOV 2018: 1.84 Passengers per revenue hour are used similarly to passengers per revenue mile. It is used to measure system productivity and its effectiveness of service provided. The more passengers transported per revenue hour, the more efficient the service. It is our objective to exceed the benchmark of 1.79 passengers per revenue hour.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: PARATRANSIT MAINTENANCE COST PER REVENUE MILE OCT 2018: $0.44 NOV 2018: $0.41 Maintenance cost per revenue mile is used to measure cost efficiency of maintaining vehicles and the effectiveness of our maintenance program. The lower the cost per revenue mile, the more effective the preventative maintenance program. It is our objective to reduce our maintenance cost per revenue mile below the benchmark of $0.52. MAINTENANCE COST PER REVENUE HOUR OCT 2018: $7.50 NOV 2018: $7.16 Like the maintenance cost per revenue mile, Maintenance cost per revenue hour is used to measure cost efficiency of maintaining vehicles and the effectiveness of our maintenance program. The lower the cost per revenue hour, the more effective the preventative maintenance program. It is our objective to reduce our maintenance cost per revenue hour below the benchmark of $7.68.