FOREIGN TRAVEL PROFESSIONAL SURVEY ABOUT ICELAND TOURISM. September 2018

Similar documents
An overview of Tallinn tourism trends

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN NOVEMBER 2018

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS IN ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2011

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN OCTOBER 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN FEBRUARY 2018

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN NOVEMBER 2017

TRIPS OF BULGARIAN RESIDENTS ABROAD AND ARRIVALS OF VISITORS FROM ABROAD TO BULGARIA IN JANUARY 2018

International Travel Management Study 2018

IMD World Talent Report Factor 1 : Investment and Development

Sprint Real Solutions Switched Data Service International Rates from the U.S. Mainland, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S.

Sprint Real Solutions Switched Data Service International Rates from the U.S. Mainland, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S.

The Nordic Countries in an International Comparison. Helga Kristjánsdóttir 20. apríl 2012

Sprint Real Solutions Switched Data Service International Rates from the U.S. Mainland, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S.

Sprint Real Solutions Option A SDS International Outbound Rates from the U.S. Mainland, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S.

% change vs. Dec ALL VISITS (000) 2,410 12% 7,550 5% 31,148 1% Spend ( million) 1,490 15% 4,370-1% 18,710 4%

AirPlus International Travel Management Study 2016 Part 1 Global business travel management booking and cost trends.

Sprint Real Solutions VPN SDS International Rates from the U.S. Mainland, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands 1*

SLOVAKIA. Table 1. FDI flows in the host economy, by geographical origin. (Millions of US dollars)

CCBE LAWYERS STATISTICS 2016

TOURIST SECTOR SITUATION STATISTICAL SUMMARY MARCH 2010.

Institute for Leisure Economics

FINLAND. Table 1. FDI flows in the host economy, by geographical origin. (Millions of US dollars)

2017 European Helicopter Market Update. Matthew Harman MRO Analyst Arlington, VA

REVIEW 2017 NOVEMBER 12 18, HANOVER

Prague Tourism Developments in Q1 2018

MONTHLY NATURAL GAS SURVEY. November 2009

IGI Wallcoverings Sales Statistics. Operations in Report to Member Companies. 15 July Contents. Introduction 3

Nearly 2.5 million nights recorded in Foreigners' share of nights over 60% Record set in 2000 HELSINKI TOURISM STATISTICS

Western Cape Destination Performance Report: April-June 2016

VUSALA EYNULLAYEVA 2368 MANAGEMENT CONSULTING LABS FALL 2016

Inbound Tourism Prague, 2014 Overall Assessment

The economic impact of ATC strikes in Europe Key findings from our updated report for A4E

Performance Derby: MSCI Share Price Indexes

Tourism Trends, Outlook and Issues. John G.C. Kester. 6th UNWTO/PATA Forum on Tourism Trends and Outlook. Guilin, China October 2012 day 1

Global Travel Trends 2005

Latest Tourism Trends. Humphrey Walwyn Head of VisitEngland Research

Second ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) / UNOOSA (United Nations Office for Outer Space affairs) Symposium

Foreign Overnights in Finland 2016

Forecast for Norwegian and foreign holiday and leisure traffic in Norway. Margrethe Helgebostad

India Market Report. Visit Finland India. Kalsi Gurpreet November

Visit Finland Visitor Survey 2017

March 2015 compared with February 2015 Volume of retail trade down by 0.8% in euro area Down by 0.6% in EU28

The Visitor Experience in Britain

Next Release: 13 April Next Release: 13 April December

Domestic, U.S. and Overseas Travel to Canada

O 2 Call Options Explained

Tourism in Tallinn 2008

PRESS RELEASE. ARRIVALS OF NON-RESIDENTS IN GREECE: January - June 2016 HELLENIC REPUBLIC HELLENIC STATISTICAL AUTHORITY. Piraeus, 13 October 2016

Survey into foreign visitors to Tallinn Target market: Cruise voyagers. TNS Emor March 2012

EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROLInfluenza A(H1N1)v

ROMANIA. Table 1. FDI flows in the host economy, by geographical origin. (Millions of US dollars)

Tourist arrivals in the Canary Islands (ISTAC)

Understanding Business Visits

AFRICA. Cape Town, April Experience the World

The most innovative knowledge platform for hoteliers

THE GROWTH OF THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY IN DUBAI

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3

Accommodation statistics 2016

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3

BALANCED AND FACT BASED. Rebalance the Palm Oil image in Europe Margot Logman, Secretary General EPOA

SWEDEN & AUSTRALIA 100+ YEARS OF DOING BUSINESS

END OF YEAR RESULTS 2016 INVESTOR CONSULTING

Tourist arrivals in the Canary Islands (ISTAC)

Tourist arrivals in the Canary Islands (ISTAC)

Tourist arrivals in the Canary Islands (ISTAC)

Survey on arrivals and overnight stays of tourists, total 2017

INTERNATIONAL REGISTRY IN ORGAN DONATION and TRANSPLANTATION

Cover Pool ( mn.) 4, , , , , ,494.6 of which derivatives ( mn.)

ELEVENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE. Montreal, 22 September to 3 October 2003

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

Tourist arrivals and overnight stays in collective accommodation 1 July 2017 (p)

Travel Policy Fly America Act Compliance Presentation. Presented by: Travel Services

total - foreign overnights - domestic overnights

PRESS RELEASE No. 24 of February 3, 2014 Tourism December and the Year 2013

Performance Derby: MSCI Regions/Countries Earnings & Revenues Growth 2018E / 2017E / 2016A

CROATIA. Table 1. FDI flows in the host economy, by geographical origin. (Millions of US dollars)

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3

Aarhus Universitet - Handels- og IngeniørHøjskolen i Herning. Engineering Edition. Partner Report

DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT REALIZATION IN QUARTER II AND JANUARY JUNE 2013

Top 10 Outbound Tourism Markets, Trips and Spending per Country To 2018

Valid effective from 01 August 2018 Amendments: Add additional cities permitted for Russia in Europe (RU) and excluded for Russia in Asia (XU)

International Operations: NATA 2012 Air Charter Summit

Annual Press Conference

assists in the development of airport capacity to meet growing demand supports the development of improved ground access to airports

Travel Policy Fly America Act Compliance Presentation. Presented by: Travel Services

Global robot installations: high double digit growth rates

BADGER HAIR AND OTHER BRUSH-MAKING HAIR AND WASTE THEREOF

SWEDISH BUSINESS FOOTPRINT IN AUSTRALIA SUPPORTED BY BUSINESS SWEDEN, EMBASSY OF SWEDEN AND SWEDISH AUSTRALIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING 3

DEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE

Partner Report Aarhus Universitet - Handels- og IngeniørHøjskolen i Herning

VisitBritain Decisions and Influences. December 2016

Tourism in Prague 2013 Overall assessment after data revision

Tourism Snapshot A focus on the markets that the CTC and its partners are active in

Booking a holiday. Foresight issue 151. VisitBritain Research

Tourist flow in Italy Year 2017

THE IMAGE AND MARKET POTENTIAL OF SIBIU INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. Market study

Tourism as an Economic Pillar. Mary Vrolijk 25 September 2015

WELCOME. EURO 2016, Earth Hall- International Poznan Fair

Rules for reimbursement of expenses for delegates attending meetings

Transcription:

FOREIGN TRAVEL PROFESSIONAL SURVEY ABOUT ICELAND TOURISM September 2018

Fieldwork summary Promote Iceland carried out an attitude survey in July and August 2018 amidst foreign travel professionals that sell tours to Iceland. Their outlook on the development of Icelandic tourism and prospects regarding sales of tours to Iceland were surveyed. A comparable survey was carried out in January 2018, June 2017 and December 2016*. The survey was sent by email to over 4000 travel professionals that sell tours to Iceland, 167 of whom took part in it. Fieldwork period: July and August 2018 Methodology: Online Survey Sample: Foreign tour operators that offer tours to Iceland Proportional breakdown of tour operators by categories: Started survey Competed survey Proportion of valid answers 167 146 87,43% Market Area Country Number Proportion N-America Canada 14 8,38% (59 answers) United States 45 26,9 Central and Southern Europe Austria 1 0,60% (62 answers) Belgium 1 0,60% France 4 2,40% Germany 16 9,58% Italy 9 5,39% Netherlands 16 9,58% Portugal 1 0,60% Spain 9 5,39% Switzerland 5 2,99% Nordic countries Denmark 7 4,19% (9 answers) Finland 1 0,60% Norway 1 0,60% British isles Ireland 1 0,60% 13,1 (27 answers) United Kingdom 26 15,5 Other countries Australia 1 0,60% 38,32% 48,50% Tour Operator Travel agent Other (10 answers) China 1 0,60% Hungary 1 0,60% India 1 0,60% Lithuania 1 0,60% Malasia 1 0,6% Poland 2 1,20% Russia 2 1,20% *Varies in timings of the surveys may reduce comparability of the results Total 167

Main findings This survey indicates that the status of bookings of tours to Iceland in the year 2018 has changed, compared to previous year, just as the prospects for the coming winter season. Overall the status is similar from one market area to another, but individual countries stand out. Looking at the status of bookings of tours to Iceland this year compared to same time last year a certain shift seems to have taken place as proportionally more participants say their booking status is worse than before. Prospects for bookings this winter season seem slightly better than for the year as a whole, and therefore align with the growth in tourism in the winter months. As previously participants mention how trendy the destination is (18%), the destination s safety (16%), increased air connections (12%) and marketing () as the main positive factors to move Icelandic tourism forward. On the other hand the price level (28%) was most often mentioned as a negative factor followed by availability of service from local suppliers (), growth in tourism in Iceland () and competing destinations ().

Tour bookings to Iceland in 2018 Compared to this time last year, how are the number of bookings with arrivals to Iceland this year for your company? 5 of participants reported similar or increased number of bookings to Iceland in 2018 compared to 2017 (-20% from the survey in January 2018 and -18% from the survey in June 2017) 40% 3 30% 2 20% 1 1 2 19% 19% 32% 29% 26% 20% 3 32% 1 4% 6% 0% Much worse Worse Equal Better Much better

Bookings to Iceland in 2018 Market breakdown Although the majority of participants reported similar or better booking status for 2018, compared to same time last year, there were for the first time proportionally more participants that reported negative booking status than positive for 2018. Participants from Central and Mid-Europe, Nordic countries and the United Kingdom were more pessimistic than other participants. On the positive side participants from the United States stand out, as 78% of them reported similar or better bookings status than previous year. Digging into these findings it s worth noting that of those, there were still proportionally fewer participants that reported better booking status than in previous surveys. The worsening booking status in Central and Mid-Europe can largely be explained by the booking status reported by participants from Germany. Only of German participants reported similar or better booking status this year compared to same time last year. The proportion of those that report worsening booking status stands out as there s a considerable increase form previous surveys. Proportionally more participants from the Nordic countries and United Kingdom also reported worse booking status than better, compared to same time last year. Although this ratio has increased from previous surveys the increase is not as great as the reports from Germany indicate. Compared to this time last year, how are the number of bookings with arrivals to Iceland this year for your company? All countries N-America C- & M-Europe Nordic countries Other countries United States United Kingdom Germany -32% -34% -38% -46% -42% -54% -69% -66% -66% -62% -6-58% -52% -66% 53% -53% -61% -70% -68% -83% -83% 11% -80% -83% -76% 32% 16% 1 3% 8% 3% 6% 2% 44% 4% 2% 36% 2 18% 18% 22% 2 2 26% 29% 33% 19% 20% 24% -2 30% 34% 1 20% 11% 19% 16% 11% 32% 32% 26% 24% 11% 2 30% 30% 28% 49% 46% 42% 43% 46% 43% 9% 1 1 9% 4% 16% 1 20% 1 7 7 83% 6 68% 66% 24% 74% 72% 73% 56% 23% 51% 54% 54% 29% 58% 42% 41% 40% 4 18% 23% 2 33% 23% 1 Much worse Worse Better Much better

Expectations about bookings to Iceland in winter 2018/2019 Compared to last winter season, what is your company's prospects for bookings to Iceland with arrivals next winter season? 6 of participants reported equal or better number of bookings to Iceland in winter 2018/2019 (-9% from last survey in January 2018 and -18% from last survey in June 2017) 4 40% 3 30% 2 20% 1 6% 3% 4% 26% 11% 42% 36% 3 23% 34% 32% 2% 1 0% Much worse Worse Equal Better Much better

Expectations about bookings to Iceland in winter 2018/2019 Market breakdown Compared to this time last year, how are the number of bookings with arrivals to Iceland this winter season for your company? Overall it s clear that the expectations about bookings to Iceland this winter season follow a similar trend as the bookings for the year 2018. The expectations are not as high as they were in previous surveys, as more participants reported about negative than positive bookings compared to same time last year. As proportionally more participants reported about similar booking status the expectations are though higher for the coming winter season than for 2018, or 6 compared to 5. The responses from participants from Mid and Central Europe, the Nordic Countries and United Kingdom continue to differentiate from the responses from participants from North America and other countries. All countries N-America C- & M-Europe Nordic countries -1-38% -46% -41% -52% -3-4 -56% -58% -34% 22% -63% -4 6% 6% 3% 4% 4% 33% 3 26% 26% 1% 11% 31% 26% 19% 23% 20% 28% 22% 34% 30% 30% 39% 2% 46% 1 42% 8% 8% 35,00% 34,00% 44, 70% 47,78% 23,00% 35,00% 7,00% Although proportionally fewer participants from the United States reported increased bookings than before the proportion of those that report worsening booking status has not grown in the same vein. The expectations about similar bookings have also grown considerably among participants from other countries compared to previous surveys, which explains why proportionally fewer participants reported about both increased and decreased expectations compared to previous surveys. Promotionally more participants from the United Kingdom and Germany reported about worse booking status for the coming winter season than in previous surveys. These findings are though not as negative as the reported booking status for these markets for the year 2018 as proportionally more expect similar booking status as previous year. Other countries United States United Kingdom Germany -58% 38% 32,50% -54% 16% 58% -41% 29% 43% 13,00% -5 18% 2% 50,00% -60% 43% 17,00% -56% 43% 24% -22% 12% -20% -32% - 20% -2 8% -22% 36% 4 2 40% 3 34% 24% 46,00% 23% 9% 38,00% 57,00% 56,6 1 55,00% 53,00% Much worse Worse Better Much better

Top positive factors for the development of tourism in Iceland Trendy destination 18,2% Safety of the destination 15,4% Increase in air connections / supply 12,4% Marketing efforts / promotion 10,9% Growth in tourism in Iceland 8, Sustainability of the destination Level of service and quality from local suppliers Availability of service from local suppliers No positive factors 3,3% 6,6% 6,6% 7, Price level / currency 3,1% Tourism policy of the destination 2,9% General growth in outbound tourism in source market 2,3% Other, please specify 1,4% Competing destinations 0,8% Question: In your opinion, what are the top five positive factors for the development of tourism in Iceland this year? (Please select up to 5 factors); Marketing efforts / promotion, Safety of the destination, Increase in air connections / supply, Sustainability of the destination, Tourism policy of the destination, Trendy destination, Price level / currency, Availability of service from local suppliers (e.g. accommodation, tours, restaurants, etc.), Level of service and quality from local suppliers, Growth in tourism in Iceland, General growth in outbound tourism in source market, Competing destinations, Other, please specify

Top positive factors for the development of tourism in Iceland Market breakdown All countries N-America Central & S- Europe Nordic countries Other countries United States United Kingdom Germany Trendy destination 18,23% 16,9 19,53% 16,6 20,00% 17,6 18,7 17, Safety of the destination 15,36% 14,68% 18,34% 16,6 6,6 13,53% 13,7 25,71% Increase in air connections / supply 12,48% 14,22% 10,6 8,33% 10,00% 14,12% 13,7 8,5 Marketing efforts / promotion 10,7 11,01% 10,06% 12,50% 13,33% 10,59% 10,00% 8,5 Growth in tourism in Iceland 8,4 11,01% 4, 4,1 16,6 11,76% 8,7 0% Sustainability of the destination 7,49% 6,88% 10,6 4,1 3,33% 6,4 5,00% 5,71% Availability of service from local suppliers 6,72% 5,96% 7,69% 8,33% 3,33% 6,4 7,50% 11,43% Level of service and quality from local suppliers 6,53% 5,96% 4, 12,50% 10,00% 5,88% 10,00% 2,86% No positive factors 3,4 0,46% 8,28% 4,1 3,33% 0% 1,2 14,29% Price level / currency 3,26% 5,50% 1,78% 4,1 0% 6,4 1,2 0% Tourism policy of the destination 2,88% 3,6 2,3 0% 3,33% 4,12% 2,50% 2,86% General growth in outbound tourism in source market 2,30% 1,83% 1,18% 4,1 6,6 1,18% 3,7 0% Other, please specify 1,34% 0,92% 1,18% 4,1 0% 1,18% 2,50% 2,86% Competing destinations 0,7 0,92% 0% 0% 3,33% 0,59% 1,2 0% Question: In your opinion, what are the top five positive factors for the development of tourism in Iceland this year? (Please select up to 5 factors); Marketing efforts / promotion, Safety of the destination, Increase in air connections / supply, Sustainability of the destination, Tourism policy of the destination, Trendy destination, Price level / currency, Availability of service from local suppliers (e.g. accommodation, tours, restaurants, etc.), Level of service and quality from local suppliers, Growth in tourism in Iceland, General growth in outbound tourism in source market, Competing destinations, Other, please specify

Top negative factors for the development of tourism in Iceland Price level / currency 28% Growth in tourism in Iceland Availability of service from local suppliers Competing destinations Level of service and quality from local suppliers 9% Tourism policy of the destination Other, please specify No negative factors Trendy destination 4% 3% 3% 6% Sustainability of the destination 3% Increase in air connections / supply 2% Marketing efforts / promotion 2% General growth in outbound tourism in source market 2% Safety of the destination 1% Question: In your opinion, what are the top five negative factors for the development of tourism in Iceland this year? (Please select up to 5 factors); Marketing efforts / promotion, Safety of the destination, Increase in air connections / supply, Sustainability of the destination, Tourism policy of the destination, Trendy destination, Price level / currency, Availability of service from local suppliers (e.g. accommodation, tours, restaurants, etc.), Level of service and quality from local suppliers, Growth in tourism in Iceland, General growth in outbound tourism in source market, Competing destinations, Other, please specify

Top negative factors for the development of tourism in Iceland Market breakdown All countries N-America Central & S- Europe Nordic countries Other countries United States United Kingdom Safety of the destination 28,20% 26,23% 29,0 30,7 38,89% 27,08% 25,9 27,2 General growth in outbound tourism in source market Marketing efforts / promotion Increase in air connections / supply Sustainability of the destination Trendy destination No negative factors Other, please specify Tourism policy of the destination Level of service and quality from local suppliers Competing destinations Availability of service from local suppliers (e.g. accommodation, tours, restaurants, etc.) Growth in tourism in Iceland Price level / currency Question: In your opinion, what are the top five negative factors for the development of tourism in Iceland this year? (Please select up to 5 factors); Marketing efforts / promotion, Safety of the destination, Increase in air connections / supply, Sustainability of the destination, Tourism policy of the destination, Trendy destination, Price level / currency, Availability of service from local suppliers (e.g. accommodation, tours, restaurants, etc.), Level of service and quality from local suppliers, Growth in tourism in Iceland, General growth in outbound tourism in source market, Competing destinations, Other, please specify Germany 13,74% 9,02% 17,32% 19,23% 5,56% 9,38% 12,99% 16,36% 13,2 16,39% 9,50% 11,54% 16,6 17,71% 16,88% 1,82% 9,72% 10,66% 7,26% 19,23% 11,11% 10,42% 10,39% 5,4 8,7 6,56% 10,61% 3,8 5,56% 7,29% 10,39% 12,73% 5,69% 1,64% 10,06% 0% 0% 0% 5,19% 18,18% 4,2 6,56% 2,23% 3,8 5,56% 6,2 5,19% 5,4 3,32% 4, 3,3 3,8 0% 3,12% 2,60% 3,64% 3,32% 10,66% 0% 0% 5,56% 11,46% 0% 0% 2,61% 2,46% 2,23% 3,8 0% 2,08% 3,90% 5,4 2,3 2,46% 3,3 3,8 0% 2,08% 0% 0% 2,3 0,82% 3,3 0% 5,56% 0% 2,60% 1,82% 1,66% 1,64% 1,12% 0% 5,56% 2,08% 2,60% 1,82% 0,71% 0,82% 0,56% 0% 0% 1,04% 1,30% 0%

Why are those that are positive towards Iceland recommending the destination? It's still an amazing place if you skip all the most popular places Iceland is unique in the world There are 30 reasons to recommend Iceland A very unique and safe country to visit Safe, interesting and clean Amazing destination: nature, people, food... nature, culture and friendly people It's new, exciting, affordable and different than any other destination It s a good experience and easy to get to Authentic destination. Peace and calmness in the right destinations

What would it take to make those that are neutral more likely to recommend Iceland as a destination? Better pricing Suppliers are applying irrational price A media blitz may help Easier to book all in 1 package through preferred suppliers More competitive prices more quality DMC s Pay attention to the price-performance ratio Support tourism in places other than Reykjavík the south coast and the close West Quicker and better response from operators availability of Halal meals

Why are those that are negative towards Iceland not recommending the destination? Availability, price and limited air options Difficult communication with the suppliers Iceland is a difficult destination to get accommodation confirmed and the reply from the suppliers is very slow Lack of knowledge and trade seminars to educate the travel industry to promote\iceland High cost compared to other countries price/quality Getting too crowded food, drinks - very expansive in comparison to their destination

RESEARCH PREPARED BY PROMOTE ICELAND PRODUCED BY TOURISM & CREATIVE INDUSTRIES TEAM AT PROMOTE ICELAND September 2018 Transcription or further distribution is not authorised without Promote Iceland consent. Promote Iceland aims to enhance Iceland s good image and reputation, to support the competitive standing of Icelandic industries in foreign markets, to attract foreign tourists and investments to the country, and assist in the promotion of Icelandic culture abroad www.islandsstofa.is Reservations This presentation is intended to inform. It is not intended as a decision making tool for the receiver. The information presented is not a promise for the future. Promote Iceland bears no duty to provide the receiver additional information than presented in the presentation or to update the information presented. The information in this presentation is based on available information, estimates about expected development of conditions and more. The information bears some uncertainty and can therefore change without a notice. By receiving this presentation the receiver admits to these reservations.