Gemini to Kodambakkam. 26 July

Similar documents
The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content

Key Tourism Indicators January to September 2017

A TRANSPORT SYSTEM CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Key Performance Indicators

Comparing Domestic and Foreign Tourists Economic Impact in Desert Triangle of Rajasthan

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Public Transport funding in a crisis: A National Treasury perspective

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION. Developing an EU civil aviation policy towards Brazil

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

THE 2006 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL & TOURISM IN INDIANA

The Economic Impact Of Luxembourg Airport 29 April 2016

Management Discussions and Analysis for the three-month period ended 31 March 2014 and Executive Summary

NOTES ON COST AND COST ESTIMATION by D. Gillen

The Civil Aviation Sector as a Driver for Economic Growth in Egypt

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Promoting Sustainable Tourism: The economic benefits for Local Government 4 April Presented by Caroline Ungersbock

SpiceJet announces Q2FY15 results: Year-on-year capacity up 7%, revenues up 15%, and expenses down 2% as turnaround efforts gain ground

Submission to. Christchurch City Council. on the. Draft Long Term Plan Date: 12 April 2018

Tourism in numbers

Aviation Taxes and Charges

The Economic Impact of Tourism West Oxfordshire Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Preparatory Course in Business (RMIT) SIM Global Education. Bachelor of Applied Science (Aviation) (Top-Up) RMIT University, Australia

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF GRAPHS

sdrftsdfsdfsdfsdw Proposed Liquor Licence Exemptions for Accredited Tourism Businesses

5 Rail demand in Western Sydney

LOW FARES AIRLINES AND THE ENVIRONMENT. June 2005

Intelligence Investment guidance. Managing aircraft. Delivering value Analysis. Member of ISTAT UK CAA Approval No. UK.MG.

AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT Universidade Lusofona January 2008

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

THE CARICOM REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

JET AIRWAYS (I) LTD. Presentation on Financial Results Q3 2012

The Public Transport System of Zurich Achievements and Challenges

How a global corporation can benefit from the international equivalence of national measurement standards

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Dover Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Government of India Ministry of Road Transport & Highways Transport Research Wing New Delhi

AIRPORT ACCESS PERMIT # FOR ON-DEMAND TAXICAB SERVICES AT MINETA SAN JOSE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BETWEEN AND THE CITY OF SAN JOSE

How can markets become more contestable?

Sharing the Way with Sustainable Transport Options

Introducing. CODISSIA Trade Fair Complex, Coimbatore, India. 9 th 11 th April 2010, CODISSIA Trade Fair Complex, Coimbatore, India

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Why to Introduce Flat Fare System in Janmarg, Ahmedabad, Gujarat A Case Study

Investing in the Region s Airline

PLANNING FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM INDUSTRY IN MAHABALESHWAR OF MAHARASHTRA STATE

Affiliate Application

B.S. PROGRAM IN AVIATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT Course Descriptions

Key Statistical Indicator For The International Airports Operator In PPP/BOT/Project Finance Environment

Retail Travel Operations

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas Analysis

ALL ABOARD LABOR S LONG TERM PASSENGER TRANSPORT STRATEGY

Ferry Fact File. Gabriola Ferry Advisory Committee

JET AIRWAYS (I) LTD. Presentation on Financial Results Q4 FY08

The 15-day comment period will run from Thursday, April 4, 2019 to 4pm on Wednesday April 18, 2019.

Standard aircraft cost comparisons Airline operating cost inputs Marketing investment data

Maximising Commercial Revenues Dwell Time. Nigel Dolby Founder

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

SECOND QUARTER RESULTS 2018

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AUTHORITY AUDIT REPORT

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Roadmapping Breakout Session Overview

Making travel easier and more affordable. easyjet s views on how aviation policy can improve the passenger experience and reduce costs

Transport Performance and the Data Clubs Approach. Richard Anderson ESRC International Public Service Rankings 13 th December 2005

Ferry Fact File. July Gabriola Ferry Advisory Committee

Rail Budget 2013: Highlights

Opportunity and Function of Airport in Lowcost Aviation Development

Interim results. 11 May 2010

Overview of Boeing Planning Tools Alex Heiter

THEME:PCS: Strategic Options in the New Decade

Passenger: 17.2 Million (+3.9% yoy) OTP: 85.8% SLF: 73.3% Subsidiaries Operating Revenues US$415.2 Million Cargo Carried 219.4K ton (+10.

MODAIR: Measure and development of intermodality at AIRport. INO WORKSHOP EEC, December 6 h 2005

Mark Scheme (Results) Summer 2008

HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY

Cebu Pacific Air (CEB) Briefing Routes Asia 2012 Chengdu, China

Ridership Growth Strategy (RGS) Status Update

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

Ref. PE004/ May Subject: Management Discussion and Analysis for the First Quarter of 2018

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Camp Stove USER MANUAL PLEASE READ AND UNDERSTAND THIS MANUAL COMPLETELY BEFORE OPERATING THE CAMP STOVE

FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS 2017

JET AIRWAYS (I) LTD. Presentation on Financial Results Q July 24, 2009

AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT. LaudaMotion Executive is the perfect partner for aircraft owners and business charter flights.

Stimulating Airports is Stimulating the Economy

CHAPTER 5 SIMULATION MODEL TO DETERMINE FREQUENCY OF A SINGLE BUS ROUTE WITH SINGLE AND MULTIPLE HEADWAYS

1.2 Some of the figures included in this publication may be provisional and revised in later issues.

Wales. Andy Thomas. Route Managing Director Wales. Ken Skates, Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Infrastructure, Welsh Government

Aircraft emissions. Global Man-Made GHG Emissions (%) Comparison of Aviation CO 2 Emissions vs Other Forms of Transport (%) Sections.

UGANDA S URBAN DEVELOPMENT; A SCRUTINY OF TRANSPORT PLANNING AND MOBILITY IN TOWNS AND CITIES

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

Transcription:

Gemini to Kodambakkam 26 July 2010 1

Gemini to 2 Km fares ` 20 to Spencer ` 30 to Sterling Road ` 50 to Kodambakkam

Asking fare depends on Distance Traffic speed (slow or fast drive) Short trip or long trip Other factors Destination (return trip availability) Customer affluence/ gullibility

Others experience Tourist taxis charge 8 hrs/ 80 Km Call taxis go by 4 Hrs/ 40Km Why not 1 hour/ 10 Km for autos? 26 July 2010 4

Amount Required per day `1160 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 410 800 700 600 500 400 560 300 200 100 0 150 Total cost per day 26 July 2010 5

Present method 26 July 2010 6

Can also divide by time 700 600 500 Petrol cost 400 300 200 Driver Remuneration Rs 6.50 per Km Rs 1.50 per minute 100 0 Maintenance Asset cost 1 2 3 26 July 2010 7

Rupees per day Many ways 800 700 600 500 400 300 Rs 1.50 per minute Rs 35 per trip 20 trips 200 100 0 Rs 6.50 per Km 1 2 3 4 26 July 2010 8

Many combinations 800 700 600 500 Petrol Cost Rs 6.50 per Km 400 300 200 Driver Remuneration Rs 1.50 per min Rs 6.50 per Km Rs 35 per trip Rs 1.50 per min 100 0 Maintenance Asset cost 1 2 3 4 5 26 July 2010 9

Amount per day All give the same income Surcharge Petrol Distance fare Distance fare Time fare Distance fare Trip fare Remuneration Time fare Maintenance Asset Amort Time fare 1 2 3 4 5 6 26 July 2010 10

Which? Inducement Trip basis Surcharge Trip basis Distance basis Distance basis Surcharges Trip Distance 26 July 2010 11

Time and distance are two legs One cannot run without the other May be, but not as well * Time fare is NOT waiting charge! 26 July 2010 12

Surcharge to direct behavior Station/ theatre surcharge Rewards congregation traffic Compensates for empty return Luggage/ Third Passenger surcharge Night Surcharge Petrol Increase Surcharge 26 July 2010 13

Traffic Surcharges Peak hour surcharge Evens out traffic to all hours Reduces congestion Business Area Surcharge Decreases traffic in crowded areas Holiday surcharge 26 July 2010 14

What now Fare structure evident to all Public hearing to secure commitment Petrol Escalation formula Transition time to be planned Perhaps Rs 10.00 for first Km/ 5 min Rate 5.00 per Km/ 5 min 26 July 2010 15

What now Fare structure evident to all Public hearing to secure commitment Petrol Escalation formula Transition time to be planned Perhaps Rs 10.00 for first Km/ 5 min Rate 5.00 per Km/ 5 min 26 July 2010 16

Department action Liberty to charge lower fares Passenger elected fare sharing Self regulating auto stops Meter lines on roads Identification mechanisms Regular statistics on traffic, demand

Auto Identification Programme Permit centric database Comprehensive information Multiple verification Stick on vehicle body Ergonomic presentation Visible at 3 seconds rule

R1: Data Collection Card Security Paper Receipt for S1 Chassis Print on R2 Data entry from R2 Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department Government of Tamil Nadu R1 PermitDate Transport Department Regn NrDate PermitDate Make and Model Regn NrDate Chassis Engine Make and Model Chassis Engine OwnerS/o S/o OwnerS/o Address 1 S/o Add 2 Address 1 Add3 Add 2 Phones Add3 Identification marks Phones R2 Identification marks Owner Signature Owner Signature

S1: Five Point Sticker Card Regn : TN-XX- 0000 Chassis XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine XXxxXXxXxxXxx 98 832 Owner: A. Traceable Person Contact: 044-2999 9090 Issued: 1 March 2003 Owner Signature S2 Regn : TN-XX- 0000 Chassis XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine XXxxXXxXxxXxx 98 832 Owner: A. Traceable Person Contact: 044-2999 9090 Issued: 1 March 2003 S3 Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department Driver Authorisation S4 98 832 Owner: A Traceable Person Address: 56, Your street Your area, Region, Chennai 600 000 Phone: 2222-3333 Auto: TN-XX- 0000 Chassis: XxXXxxXxxXXx Engine: XXxxXXxXxxXx Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department Auto Owner Identification 1-3- 2003. Permit: 98 832 Name A Traceable Person Address: 56, Your street Your area, Region, Chennai 600 000 Phone: 2222-3333 Idn: Mole on right cheek, Scar on left elbow Chassis: XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine: XXxxXXxXxxXx S5 Sign Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department S6 TN-XX- 0000 Permit: 98 832 Exp: Owner: A Traceable Person, Phone: 2222-3333 Chassis: XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine: XXxxXXxXxxXx Passenger Instructions Area FC, Tax 1 FC, Tax 2 FC, Tax 3 FC, Tax 4 FC, Tax 5

S2: Front Sticker Permit centric Identify from15 feet Vehicle data Stick on vehicle body Regn : TN-XX- 0000 Chassis XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine XXxxXXxXxxXxx 98 832 Owner: A. Traceable Person Contact: 044-2999 9090 Issued: 1 March 2003 Owner Signature S2

S3: Rear Sticker Permit centric Identify from15 feet Vehicle data Stick on vehicle body Regn : TN-XX- 0000 Chassis XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine XXxxXXxXxxXxx 98 832 Owner: A. Traceable Person Contact: 044-2999 9090 Issued: 1 March 2003 Owner Signature S3

S4: Driver Authorisation Card Owner gives this card to driver Corroborates other data on vehicle Can be laminated Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department Driver Authorisation S4 98 832 Owner: A Traceable Person Address: 56, Your street Your area, Region, Chennai 600 000 Phone: 2222-3333 Auto: TN-XX- 0000 Chassis: XxXXxxXxxXXx Engine: XXxxXXxXxxXx

S5: Owner ID Card Full details Permit centric Photo Vehicle data Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department Auto Owner Identification 1-3- 2003. Permit: 98 832 Name A Traceable Person Address: 56, Your street Your area, Region, Chennai 600 000 Phone: 2222-3333 Idn: Mole on right cheek, Scar on left elbow Chassis: XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine: XXxxXXxXxxXx S5 Sign

S6: Inside Sticker Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department S6 TN-XX- 0000 Permit: 98 832 Exp: Owner: A Traceable Person, Phone: 2222-3333 Chassis: XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine: XXxxXXxXxxXx Passenger Instructions Area FC, Tax 1 FC, Tax 2 FC, Tax 3 FC, Tax 4 FC, Tax 5 All data including owner photo FC renewals, permit renewals, regulatory controls Vehicle data Paste inside cabin in passenger area

Regn : TN-XX- 0000 Chassis XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine XXxxXXxXxxXxx 98 832 Owner: A. Traceable Person Contact: 044-2999 9090 Issued: 1 March 2003 Owner Signature S2 Regn : TN-XX- 0000 Chassis XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine XXxxXXxXxxXxx 98 832 Owner: A. Traceable Person Contact: 044-2999 9090 Issued: 1 March 2003 S3 Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department Driver Authorisation S4 98 832 Owner: A Traceable Person Address: 56, Your street Your area, Region, Chennai 600 000 Phone: 2222-3333 Auto: TN-XX- 0000 Chassis: XxXXxxXxxXXx Engine: XXxxXXxXxxXx Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department Auto Owner Identification 1-3- 2003. Permit: 98 832 Name A Traceable Person Address: 56, Your street Your area, Region, Chennai 600 000 Phone: 2222-3333 Idn: Mole on right cheek, Scar on left elbow Chassis: XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine: XXxxXXxXxxXx S5 Sign Government of Tamil Nadu Transport Department S6 TN-XX- 0000 Permit: 98 832 Exp: Owner: A Traceable Person, Phone: 2222-3333 Chassis: XXxXXxxXxxXXx Engine: XXxxXXxXxxXx

The Perspective Not about auto drivers It is the micro transit of the city 26 July 2010 27

Stakeholders Drivers and passengers Owners Capital (banks, lenders) Fellow road users Manufacturers, industry Regulators Society 26 July 2010 28

Fares and stakeholder effects A fare is income to a driver Expense to a passenger Fellow road user comfort Owners and capital provide flow Manufacturers improve product Opportunity effect on society Regulators find responsible subjects 26 July 2010 29

The Situation-- Madras 175 square kilometers 6 million population 40,000 (- 100,000?) autos Taxis have been edged out! Culture at worst Auto drivers are despised 26 July 2010 30

Autos and Chennai Ambulance of the poor, school bus of the middle class, goods carrier of the tradesmen, limousine of the traveller Only to-door service in Madras Economic and social importance of autos not evident to society 26 July 2010 31

AutoFact: Second largest Second largest people mover in city Autos move 15 Lakhs, Buses 30 lakhs Occupy one half road space Autos reduce traffic congestion Turns in 5 m, taxis require 12 m One fourth road wear One third pollution 26 July 2010 32

AutoFact: Contribution to Economy Investment of ` 500 crores Revenue of Rs 1000 crores per annum 80,000 driver families Ancillary tradesmen of 10,000 families Change to taxis needs 2000 crores! No proper taxi vehicle in India! 26 July 2010 33

AutoFact: Contribution to City Life Good auto facility can improve city life Music season, tourism, night cinema can flourish with a good auto system Critical for better quality of living 26 July 2010 34

The Problem Fares not linked to Service or cost Permits not related to demand Licensing not to knowledge Capital does not reach directly Outdated engineering Exploitative culture at all levels Economic and social importance not evident 26 July 2010 35

The Public s Prayer Any time, any place Available where they want No tampered meters Courtesy Reasonable fare No wars when petrol prices go up 26 July 2010 36

The Auto Driver s Prayer Decent living income Freedom from financiers/ owner cartels No bureaucratic harassment Security for family and future Respectability 26 July 2010 37

If projects can be costed, why not auto fares? If you pay peanuts, only monkeys will work for you

If taxation is tweaked to influence behaviour why not fares? Living beings change behaviour to maximise income and minimise expense

The Situation Many do not know actual distance Wide variation in fares Knowledge of distance, lay of the city can reduce misunderstanding 26 July 2010 40

How far is Central 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 26 July 2010 41

How much 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 4 8 10 >8 8 7 6 5 4 3 26 July 2010 42

What is 8 Km 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 <4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >13 26 July 2010 43

The Distance Map Intuitive Over 100 distances Round numbers ½, 1, 1½, 2, 2½ Km Recognisable marks Accuracy over time 26 July 2010 44

The Caution High fares chases away customers Low income chases away good drivers Only a scientific, logical, comprehensive method can improve matters Should be evident to all parties 26 July 2010 45

More on structuring of fares 26 July 2010 46

Factors of price and traffic Total demand in Passenger-Km Trips per day Trip distance, duration, occupancy Empty cruising time and distance Decides number of permits 26 July 2010 47

Example of Bus Service Quality of vehicle Frequency / waiting time Service coverage Number of stops/ travel time Staff quality 26 July 2010 48

Logic of Auto Fares Quality of Service Demand for Service Price or affordability Need for continuous statistics! 26 July 2010 49

Quality of Service Waiting time for auto Quality of vehicle Quality of driver Comfort of drive Price or Fare 26 July 2010 50

Required: Statistics Bank Demand Statistics Utilisation Entry Economics Quality of Service 26 July 2010 51

The Proposal: Blue Line Autos Organisation of Auto Drivers who are owners Professional Management Board of Eminent People

Process: The Anand Model Organisational advantage Scale, Statistics, Capital Organisation culture Security, steady income, benefits Develop corporate mentality Purpose, Responsibility, affiliation 26 July 2010 53

Major Inputs Educated/ trained owner- drivers Bank finance at 12%, subsidy Custom vehicles from manufacturer Insurance for vehicle, health, income Corporate affiliation, social status Steady income, leave, benefits 26 July 2010 54

Education: Driving and Culture Driving skills and culture City knowledge Map reading People handling Regular refresher Traffic and fare statistics 26 July 2010 55

Insurance: Investment, Health Full insurance for auto Accident disability insurance Medical Insurance for driver and family Life insurance Income protection 26 July 2010 56

Appropriate Engineering GPS meters Dispatch network Cell phone PCO/ VHF Statistics generator Vehicle Identifier 26 July 2010 57

Product Design and Price Load carrying space Driver seat design Fuel efficient 3 year warranty/ Service Volume Price 26 July 2010 58

Support Maintenance Shop Fuel Pumps/ Arrangements RTO Facilitation-- AASI? Ride Locator Social facilitation 26 July 2010 59

Comparison of Fares-(Rupees) 1 5 Km/ 30 min LON TYO NYC PAR SIN HKG MAA 900-1100 700-900 600-700 350-500 150-250 250-350 2 Per Km 160 120 100 40 14 45 3.50 3 Per min 27 50 10 25 7 10 Nil 20 26 July 2010 60

Earnings and Costs Today Cost Interest Fuel Pmts Misc Income Leased 0 0% 90 110 30 135 New 1,10,000 24-36% 60 130 20 155 Autoner 80,000 12% 60 80 20 205 26 July 2010 61

The Distance Map 26 July 2010 62

The Survey Comprehensive socio- economicvocational survey Scientific and academically accurate 270 samples, 3 distances each 90% confidence level Survey of passengers Survey of short distance travel 26 July 2010 63

26 July 2010 64

26 July 2010 65