Memorandum. Conclusions

Similar documents
Paul Sturm Roberto Viqueira Ríos

EU GPP CRITERIA FOR INDOOR CLEANING SERVICES 1. INTRODUCTION

Cruise Industry Perspective on OWS and Waste Management

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

DIDYMO SURVEY, LOWER FRYINGPAN RIVER, BASALT, COLORADO 2015

Pathogens and Grazing Livestock

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

ES Aircraft Deicing Document Identification Number Date: March 15, ) Activity Description:

Permittees under Sector S are primarily engaged in the following types of activities:

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2017 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Agenda Report. Spruce Street Outlet Drainage Improvements Tower Road Relief Sewer

Geoscape Toronto The Oak Ridges Moraine Activity 2 - Page 1 of 10 Information Bulletin

SF1363 / HF 1061: Legacy Funding; Conference Agreement

Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011

Mt. Hood National Forest

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

Welcome KROSNO CREEK DIVERSION PROJECT CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Mountain Goats and Winter Recreation November 17, 2011

The combined Planning and Zoning and Council Meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m.

USDA Forest Service Deschutes National Forest DECISION MEMO. Round Lake Christian Camp Master Plan for Reconstruction and New Facilities

Waukegan & Calumet Rivers. All Hands Meeting

Finn Creek Park. Management Direction Statement Amendment

EU ECOLABEL USER MANUAL TOURIST ACCOMMODATION Commission Decision for the award of the EU Ecolabel for tourist accommodation (2017/175/EC)

Lake Chapala; State of the Lake 2017

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

Silvia Giulietti ETIS Conference Brussels An EEA reporting mechanism on tourism and environment and ETIS

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

USDA Trails Strategy WRI: ENGLISH PEAK SURVEY. Theodore Mendoza San Diego State University June 6 th 2016 August 18 th Advisor: Sam Commarto

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project

Appendix E. Pollutant Load Maps of SWAT Model Results

CYPRUS Country Report

2018 Animas River Water Quality Monitoring

THE IPA NEWSLETTER Mystic Lake, Middle Pond, and Hamblin Pond in Marstons Mills, MA

The Evolution of DFW Airport s Deicing Program Balancing Risks with Results MAY 20, 2015

Managing Hypochlorite to Reduce Chlorate Formation: A Utility Case Study

Fuel from the Forest. create a multiple cash flow, regenerate biodiversity, power combustion engines. Researched, Written and Updated by Gunter Pauli

Finding sources of fecal coliform bacteria in stormwater runoff

Global Sustainable Tourism Destinations Criteria

Gravel and Rock Extraction Highway Maintenance, Recapitalization and Twinning

Figure 1 shows the evaluation area around Tailings Basin Cells 2E/1E. Two areas were evaluated for potential wetland impacts including:

Sandbag Barrier. Suitable Applications Sandbag barriers may be suitable: As a linear sediment control measure:

Yard Creek Provincial Park. Management Plan

Our Mission: Our Goals:

Cat Island Chain Background & Access Guide

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

Aquatic insect surveys at Mount Magazine State Park and Hobbs State Park Conservation Area with implementation of an educational component

TRAILS WHERE TO FIND TRAILS IN NOVA SCOTIA

With the first portion of this process complete, we anticipate the general timeline for the remainder of the process to be:

INTERNATIONAL RULES AND INDUSTRY _ ISSUES OF OHS

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

4. Hydrology of the Olentangy River Watershed

NEW WEB TOOL FOR UNDERSTANDING BIOLUMINESCENT BAYS

11th Annual Conference

FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA SUMMARY SHEET

Crew Ensures First-Class Safety and Sustainability on the Queen Mary Hotel

BRYAN REGIONAL PARK. Presented by: Burditt Consultants November 13, 2018

112th CONGRESS. 1st Session H. R. 113 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Peace Project Water Use Plan

Metro District 1500 W. County Road B 2 Roseville, MN Date: July 17, 2018

E. coli and Coliform Bacteria Levels of Edgewood s Watershed Katie Schneider and Leslie Reed

Park Updates 1. Cavalero 2. Lundeen 3. Frontier Heights Citizen Advisory Committee

Terms of Reference: Introduction

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Paso Robles Groundwater Basin: Effects of Geothermal Waters on Water Quality and Availability

Chico Municipal Airport» About Chico Airport» JetChico (Hyperlinks to the JetChico and Chico Airport Websites needed here.) Airline Travel Bank

Appendix A: San Francisco River Photos Gila National Forest

German Financial Cooperation: Support for the management of the extended Drin River Basin

THERMACAPTURE NEOAIR MATTRESSES RIDGEREST AND Z LITE MATTRESSES

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EWFD/WFD IN THE REGION OF VOJVODINA WITHIN JOINT SLOVAK-SERBIA SERBIA PROJECTS

How long does levofloxacin take to work for pneumonia

THAT the Board approve the final proposed concept plan for the Jericho Marginal Wharf site as shown in Figure C-4 of Appendix C.

Numaykoos Lake Provincial Park. Management Plan

RE: PROPOSED MAXIMUM LEVELS OF AIRPORT CHARGES DRAFT DETERMINATION /COMMISSION PAPER CP6/2001

AND SOIL EROSION ISSUES IN UPPER BIDWELL PARK

LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 07/24/2018) Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 07/16/2018

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Portland Water District Sebago Lake Monitoring Programs Lower Bay Bacteria Monitoring Presenting data from 1977 to 2018 Laurel Jackson

% farmers/private landowners in watershed applying BMPs. Other (Number of participants completed the training)

SELF-ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS

Little Limestone Lake Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Strategies & Tactics for Managing Social Impacts in Wilderness

Powder River Training Complex Commonly Asked Questions September 15, 2010

PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM. COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 4g ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting February 9, 2016

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND

CITY OF LYNDEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT MARCH 1, 2016

Presentation Overview

FY2017 Radioactive Material Monitoring of Aquatic Organisms (August)

Introduction. Implementation of the Village of Capac Master Plan

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Strategies & Tactics for Managing Social Impacts in Wilderness

July 31, Comments re Environmental Impact Statement & License Application For Deep Geologic Repository Project

Thanks to all the Sponsors. Thanks to all the Exhibitors 3/19/2012

2011 Lake Minnetonka Zebra Mussel Study Summary December 8, 2011

Mark West Creek Flow Study Report

Summary of prescribed fires in Prince Albert National Park 2015

Transcription:

Memorandum To: Jeff Oliver, City of Golden Valley From: Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Co. Subject: Follow-up on Phase 1 of Twin Lake Alum Treatment and Recommendations for Phase 2 Date: June 13, 2018 Project: 23271420.00 PH1 c: Laura Jester, Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC) Twin Lake received the first phase of an alum treatment in the spring of 2015 (BCWMC CIP project TW-2). The intent of the first phase was to deliver half of the total dosage of aluminum to immobilize the releasable forms of phosphorus in the lake sediments, thereby reducing internal phosphorus loading and protecting the high water quality of the lake. The split dosage serves two purposes: 1) it minimizes the potential impacts on aquatic biota during each phase of treatment, and 2) it improves the overall treatment efficiency and longevity of the alum treatment. More background on the project, and general information about alum treatments, is included in a two-page handout (included as an attachment to this memo). Approximately $71,000 remains in the BCWMC CIP budget to complete the Twin Lake alum treatment. To further assess the need for the second phase of the alum treatment, Barr collected two new sediment cores from Twin Lake and analyzed the post-treatment lake water quality monitoring data. The locations of the sediment core sampling sites are shown in Figure 1. Conclusions Based on our review of the updated monitoring data, the first phase of alum treatment was very successful at controlling internal phosphorus load and we do not feel that it would be beneficial to conduct the second phase of the alum treatment at this time. Our conclusion is based on the following: 1. Figures 2 and 3 show that the alum floc layer (and bound phosphorus) is still very near the surface of the sediment and has not experienced significant sediment accumulation since the first phase of the alum treatment. 2. Figure 4 shows that the bottom water total phosphorus (TP) concentration in 2017 was between 80% and 90% lower than the pretreatment monitoring, when compared to the long-term average TP concentration and the 2014 TP concentration, respectively. This confirms that the first phase of the alum treatment has largely controlled the internal phosphorus load. Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com

!? Twin-4 Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.4.1, 2017-07-25 11:10 File: I:\Client\BassettCreek\Work_Orders\Twin_Lake_Sediment_Sampling\Maps\MISC\Figure 1 - Twin Lake Sediment Monitoring Locations 2017.mxd User: EMA -10' -20' -30' -40' -50'!? Twin-5 Imagery: MnGeo, 2016!? Sediment Monitoring Locations 10' Contour!;N 0 250 Feet 1 inch = 250 feet TWIN LAKE 2017 Sediment Monitoring Locations FIGURE 1

To: Jeff Oliver, City of Golden Valley From: Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Co. Subject: Follow-up on Phase 1 of Twin Lake Alum Treatment and Recommendations for Phase 2 Date: June 13, 2018 Page: 3 Figure 2 Aluminum-bound phosphorus concentrations throughout the sediment core profile Figure 3 Photo of sediment core showing alum floc within the top layer P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271420 Twin Lake Alum Treatment\WorkFiles\Alum effectiveness assessment\barr memo regarding follow-up on Twin Lake Alum Treatment.docx

To: Jeff Oliver, City of Golden Valley From: Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Co. Subject: Follow-up on Phase 1 of Twin Lake Alum Treatment and Recommendations for Phase 2 Date: June 13, 2018 Page: 4 Figure 4 Historical summer average total phosphorus concentrations of Twin Lake bottom water Recommendations It is still expected that the second phase of the alum treatment will be needed in the future. It is recommended that the second phase of the alum treatment should be reconsidered after monitoring data (both sediment and lake phosphorus) becomes available, following the 2020 monitoring season. As a result, it is suggested that BCWMC hold CIP budget funds to conduct the second phase of the treatment and associated assessment. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271420 Twin Lake Alum Treatment\WorkFiles\Alum effectiveness assessment\barr memo regarding follow-up on Twin Lake Alum Treatment.docx

Alum treatment: Protecting the water quality of Twin Lake With the goal of improving water quality in Twin Lake, the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission and City of Golden Valley plan to treat the lake with aluminum sulfate (alum) in 2015. As a lakearea resident you may have some questions about alum treatment. We hope this information sheet answers those questions. You ll also have an opportunity to learn more at a public meeting scheduled for March 19 (see information box at right). Alum: frequently asked questions Why treat the lake with alum? The alum treatment will provide safe, effective control of algae in Twin Lake for 20 30 years or longer. The result will be cleaner, clearer water for recreation. What does alum do? Alum (aluminum sulfate) is derived from aluminum. It has been used in water purification and wastewater treatment for centuries and in lake restoration for decades. The chemical reduces the growth of algae by trapping phosphorus in the lake sediments. Where does phosphorus come from? From external sources such as stormwater runoff or groundwater. From internal sources phosphorus that has already accumulated in lakebottom sediments and is periodically re-suspended in the summer. Project partners have worked to control external sources of phosphorus. But, even when external sources have been reduced, phosphorus that is recycled from the lake s sediments into the overlying waters can support explosive algal growth. This process, frequently referred to as internal loading, can be controlled by alum. How does alum work? Alum is injected into the lake, several feet below the water s surface. Upon contact with the water it becomes aluminum hydroxide, taking the form of a fluffy substance called floc. This floc works to improve water quality in two ways: 1. As it settles to the bottom of the lake, the floc interacts with phosphorus to form aluminum phosphate, an insoluble compound. In this state the phosphorus can no longer be used by algae for food. Other suspended particles are also collected by the floc, leaving the water noticeably clearer. Public meeting Alum treatments in Twin Lake Date: March 19, 2015 Time: 6:30 8 p.m. Place: Golden Valley City Hall Council Chambers Address: 7800 Golden Valley Road For additional information, please contact Tom Hoffman at 763-593-8044 (thoffman@ goldenvalleymn.gov). 2. On the bottom of the lake, the floc forms a layer which binds with phosphorus as it is released from the sediment. This produces a blanket over the sediment, reducing internal loading. How long does it take to complete an alum treatment project? Alum treatments are generally made either in the late fall or early spring over a period of 7 10 days. How quickly will results be seen? Lake transparency will increase dramatically, even within a few hours. Reductions in algae should be noticeable within one year.

How long will the alum treatment last and how can we extend the effectiveness of the treatment? Since Twin Lake does not receive much phosphorus from external sources, the alum treatment is expected to maintain the lake s water quality for 20 30 years, or longer. Twin Lake alum application zone We can extend the effectiveness of the treatment by limiting the phosphorus that enters the lake from surface runoff. Leaves, grass clippings, eroded soil, fertilizers, and animal droppings are examples of phosphorus-rich materials carried by surface runoff. The effectiveness of alum can also be increased by splitting the full alum treatment into multiple applications. Two applications will be used to treat Twin Lake. Will recreation/aesthetics be affected? Treatment is planned during times of the year when lake water temperatures would discourage in-lake recreational activities. Swimming, canoeing and boating can continue during treatment; however, direct contact with the alum barge should be avoided. Because application of the alum takes place in relatively deep water (6 or more feet), it is unlikely that the floc would be visible in shallow, recreational areas. Is alum safe? Yes. There is no evidence to suggest that aluminum ingested in water poses a health threat. Water treatment plants throughout the United States use hundreds of thousands of tons of alum annually and many municipalities use it for wastewater treatment. The floc is harmless to water creatures and aquatic plants; no adverse effects on spawning habitat have been documented. Above: The figure shows the extent of the alum treatment area; inset is a photo of an alum treatment barge. Below: Photos of Spring Lake before (left) and after alum treatment (right) by the Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District. The Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and leading medical experts all concur that aluminum is not a risk factor for any diseases or health conditions.