Outline of TEPCO Fukushima NPP accident

Similar documents
NUCLEAR PROBLEMS WITH THE JAPAN DISASTER. Yasuhiro Otomo, MD. PhD.

Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, Fukushima Daiichi NPP Accident (1/5)

Now and Future: Looking at Fukushima

Japan s Nuclear Accident - Update - June 7, 2011 Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Government of Japan

Nuclear Emergency Exercise of NPPs in Japan. IAEA/ANSN/EPR-TG Workshop. October, 2013

WHO SITREP NO 10 SITUATION SUMMARY

Changes in Land Use Following Natural Disasters and the Role of Protected Areas

Dose Assessment of External Exposure

people have been evacuated and rescue operations are ongoing.

Dr. Yoichi Watanabe, M.D. Fukushima Red Cross Hospital. Vice President Director General (Dept. of Neurosurgery) Fukushima Red Cross Hospital

The Fukushima nuclear accident

The Accident at Fukushima

P. Gaubert, A. Funayama and H. Moriya (School of Engineering, Tohoku University)

3. Nuclear Power Stations Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station

Japan s Challenges Towards Recovery

WHO SITREP NO 11 SITUATION SUMMARY

Observation of the Exercise Objects, Locations, Points and Program on Day2 - Observers Manual -

TRANSPRTATION in Japan has been NRMALIZED except part of the devastated area Material 1

A PRA Practioner looks at the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

1. Objective of this monitoring in Hokkaido

Chapter 2 Brief Overview of the Tohoku 3.11 Mega Earthquake, Tsunami, and Fukushima NPS Disasters

EO Contribution to Recovery Activities - A case study on the experience of the Great East Japan Earthquake -

Japan s Challenges Towards Recovery. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Government of Japan

Situation and response of JAEA to the Earthquake in Northeastern Japan (Outline of activities on March 11-18)

Results of Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT in Aichi, Aomori, Ishikawa, and Fukui Prefectures

Japan earthquake and tsunami Situation Report No March 2011 As of 1830 hrs Manila Time

Japan s Current Status and Challenges Towards Recovery

Overview of the ATC activities

Disaster status in Prefecture The Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011 was centered offshore of Sanriku and occurred at 2:46 p.m. March 11, 2011 and ma

Archaeology and cultural heritage in Fukushima today: four years since the Great East Japan Earthquake

Population Movement in the Tohoku Region after the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster

Tsunami Survey Results in the NPS and Reproduction Analysis Using Tsunami Inversion

Current Status of Reconstruction and Challenges

Fukushima Meltdown: The World's First Earthquake-Tsunami-Nuclear Disaster By Takashi Hirose

Towards Recovery. Consulate General of Japan in New York

Fukushima Reconstruction: Current Status and Radiation Health Risks

Transport and Travel in Japan

The Japanese Radiological Event at Fukushima Plant 1 (Daiichi)

lessons we should learn from the Great East Japan Disaster?

IOC/UNESCO Bulletin No. 8 As of 23 March 2011

Monitoring data of clean water (tap water)

Damage and Provision of Aid of Water Supply in Disaster-hit Areas, the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

WCO General Session JAPAN. Rengo Co., Ltd. May 23, 2011 / Montreal

Damage from the Tohoku-Pacific Ocean Earthquake and future prospects

Damage from the Tohoku-Pacific Ocean Earthquake and future prospects

CHRONOLOGY of INCIDENTS INVOLVING the JCO ACCIDENT AND NUCLEAR ENERGY in JAPAN (As of the end of Sep. 2001)

Japan s Challenges Towards Recovery. June, 2011 Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry

Great East Japan Earthquake Kimiaki Nagashima

The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. (immediate version)

Thanks to the efforts of so many people and their support including that of international society, reconstruction is moving steadily ahead.

Japan s Challenges Towards Recovery. Embassy of Japan in France Japan

Dose Monitoring Map (Estimates) (As of July 11, 2011)

Regulatory Actions Taken after Fukushima

Japan & JICA s experiences, Risk Governance and/for Resilience and Risk Reduction =The 2nd Arab Conference on DRR=

Chapter 10 Development and Operation of a Carborne Survey System, KURAMA

Japan's catastrophe and the disaster that awaits

Scenario Analysis of Mega Earthquake and Tsunami in Central Japan

Press Release (This is provisional translation. Please refer to the original text written in Japanese.)

GREAT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER NILIM, JAPAN

The Hokkaido Earthquake: a (very) preliminary analysis revision 1

Economic Policy and condition after the great east Japan earthquake

Report on a Civil Protection Training Exercise in Aomori Prefecture with a Dirty Bomb Scenario

The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Situation Report 3. SEEDS Asia

European Chernobyl Week 2014

Epicenter of the Eastern Japan Great Earthquake

Comparison of fallout in rain due to the Fukushima and Chernobyl reactor accidents and the Hiroshima atomic bomb

The 11th Fukushima Vocal Ensemble Competition March 22 - March 26, 2018 Fukushima, Japan

Restoration and Challenge of Sendai Towards a Disaster-Resilient and Environmentally-Friendly City

Post tsunami Recovery of Port and Harbor areas in Japan from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Tsunami

Dose Readings Map (as of April 24, 2011)

16 July 07 M w 6.6 Niigata ken Chuetsu Oki Earthquake 平成 19 年 (2007 年 ) 新潟県中越沖地震

Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: a view from satellite data

Looking at Fukushima after 6 years of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Report of Study Tour to Fukushima From March 7 9, 2017

The Japanese Exhibition Industry Impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Current Status of Recovery

Press Release. Press Release (This is provisional translation. Please refer to the original text written in Japanese.)

RESTORATIONS AND SYSTEM INTERACTIONS OF LIFELINES IN THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE DISASTER, 2011

REGENERATION. February 21 st, 2012 Takashi ONISHI Professor, the University of Tokyo President, Science Council of Japan

In depth damage report by affected cities

Impact on Oil Distribution and Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 2-6. Evacuation. CLUSTER 2: Nonstructural Measures. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

Japan s Nuclear Crisis

Recent Natural Disasters in Japan

References for Tohoku Trip June Contents


Monitoring of environmental radioactivity

Radiation, Dangerous Goods, All Hazards Dr Anthony Evans Chief, Aviation Medicine Section International Civil Aviation Organization Montreal, Canada

Tohoku Pacific Ocean Earthquake: Current Status and Restoration Plan

Great East Japan Earthquake

The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Situation Report 4. SEEDS Asia

Summary 1. The number of manufacturing establishments

MARCH 2011, TSUNAMI DISASTER IN JAPAN

The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Situation Report 5. SEEDS Asia

What is Chernobyl? How did it affect the people of Europe?

Path forward for reconstruction after the disaster

Tsunami Impacting Eastern Japan and Preparedness for Extraordinary Natural Disaster. Takehiko Fujita

The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. Situation Report 6. SEEDS Asia

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 1-3. Hydro-meteorological Disasters Associated with Tsunamis and Earthquakes. CLUSTER 1: Structural Measures

Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

Letter to editor Field study in Hokkaido Prefecture after the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake

REPORT OF STUDY TRIP (Niigata & Miyagi Prefectures)

Transcription:

ANSN Regional Workshop on Medical Response to Radiological Emergency Handling Complex Situations Outline of TEPCO Fukushima NPP accident Makoto Akashi, MD, PhD National Institute of Radiological Sciences The Great East Japan Earthquake Fukushima Daiichi NPP Epicenter Source: www.tepco.co.jp Fukushima Daini NPP Occurred at 14:46 on March 11, 2011 Magnitude:9.0 Mw Epicenter location: 38 1 N and 142 9 E, and 24km in depth The height of tsunami which attacked Fukushima NPP was higher than 14 m (Max. 39 m at Taro town) Source: www.tepco.co.jp 1

Damages to Fukushima Daiichi NPP -All operating units were automatically shut down safely, when earthquake occurred. -Emergency D/Gs have worked properly until the Tsunami attack. 1 Loss of Off-site Power due to the Earthquake Partially damaged Grid Line Tsunami (inundation height 14~15 m) Turbine Building Reactor Building About 25 M About 44 M Seawater level Seawater Pump Elevation: About 10 m D/G Emergency Diesel Generators 2Emergency Diesel Generator Inoperable due to the Tsunami 3Blackout & loss of all Cooling Function 2 Bare exposure of the fuels & damage to the fuel cladding Decreased water levels in the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) resulted in : Bare exposure of the fuels Damage to the fuel cladding, which is a metal tube that covers the fuel rods by the high temperatures Release of radionuclides 3

Reactor vessel control rod motors fuel core element control rod element Modified from Japan Atomic Energy Relations Organization 4 Release of radionuclides The earthquake and tsunami affected the Fukushima Daiichi NPP and caused serious damages to NPP, resulting in a large amount of radioactive materials being released into the environment. Te-132 8.8 10 16 Bq (half life 78.2 h) I-131 1.6 10 17 Bq (half life 8.0 d) Cs-134 1.8 10 16 Bq (half life 2.1 y) Cs-137 1.5 10 16 Bq (half life 30.0 y) As of June 6, 2011 Modification on October 20, 2011 ( by Nuclear and Industrial Safety) 5

Radionuclides released into the Atmosphere radionuclides half-life Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Total Xe-133 5.2 d 3.4 10 18 3.5 10 18 4.4 10 18 1.1 10 19 Cs-134 2.1 y 7.1 10 14 1.6 10 16 8.2 10 14 1.8 10 16 Cs-137 30.0 y 5.9 10 14 1.4 10 16 7.1 10 14 1.5 10 16 Sr-89 50.5 d 8.2 10 13 6.8 10 14 1.2 10 15 2.0 10 15 Sr-90 29.1 y 6.1 10 12 4.8 10 13 8.5 10 13 1.4 10 14 Ba-140 12.7 d 1.3 10 14 1.1 10 15 1.9 10 15 3.2 10 15 Te-127m 109.0 d 2.5 10 14 7.7 10 14 6.9 10 13 1.1 10 15 Te-129m 33.6 d 7.2 10 14 2.4 10 15 2.1 10 14 3.3 10 15 Te-131m 30.0 h 2.2 10 15 2.3 10 15 4.5 10 14 5.0 10 15 Te-132 78.2 h 2.5 10 16 5.7 10 16 6.4 10 15 8.8 10 16 Ru-103 39.3 d 2.5 10 09 1.8 10 09 3.2 10 09 7.5 10 09 Ru-106 368.2 d 7.4 10 08 5.1 10 08 8.9 10 08 2.1 10 09 Zr-95 64.0 d 4.6 10 11 1.6 10 13 2.2 10 11 1.7 10 13 Ce-141 32.5 d 4.6 10 11 1.7 10 13 2.2 10 11 1.8 10 13 Ce-144 284.3 d 3.1 10 11 1.1 10 13 1.4 10 11 1.1 10 13 Np-239 2.4 d 3.7 10 12 7.1 10 13 1.4 10 12 7.6 10 13 Pu-238 87.7 y 5.8 10 08 1.8 10 10 2.5 10 08 1.9 10 10 Pu-239 24065 y 8.6 10 07 3.1 10 09 4.0 10 07 3.2 10 09 Pu-240 6537 y 8.8 10 07 3.0 10 09 4.0 10 07 3.2 10 09 Pu-241 14.4 y 3.5 10 10 1.2 10 12 1.6 10 10 1.2 10 12 Y-91 58.5 d 3.1 10 11 2.7 10 12 4.4 10 11 3.4 10 12 Pr-143 13.6 d 3.6 10 11 3.2 10 12 5.2 10 11 4.1 10 12 Nd-147 11.0 d 1.5 10 11 1.3 10 12 2.2 10 11 1.6 10 12 Cm-242 162.8 d 1.1 10 10 7.7 10 10 1.4 10 10 1.0 10 11 I-131 8.0 d 1.2 10 16 1.4 10 17 7.0 10 15 1.6 10 17 I-132 2.3 h 1.3 10 13 6.7 10 06 3.7 10 10 1.3 10 13 I-133 20.8 h 1.2 10 16 2.6 10 16 4.2 10 15 4.2 10 16 I-135 6.6 h 2.0 10 15 7.4 10 13 1.9 10 14 2.3 10 15 Sb-127 3.9 d 1.7 10 15 4.2 10 15 4.5 10 14 6.4 10 15 Sb-129 4.3 h 1.4 10 14 5.6 10 10 2.3 10 12 1.4 10 14 Mo-99 66.0 h 2.6 10 09 1.2 10 09 2.9 10 09 6.7 10 09 Amouts of radionuclides released into the atmosphere were evaluated by the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency of Japan. http://www.meti.go.jp/press/2011/06/20110606008/20110606008-1.pdf Present status of NPPs in Japan On March 11, 2013, Operation 0 Under Suspension 50 As of September 15, 2013 1 Tomari 2 3 35 out of 54 reactors were in operation. Kashiwazaki-Kariwa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Higashidori 1 Takahama Mihama Tsuruga 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 Shiga 1 2 Onagawa 1 2 3 Fukushima Daiichi 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ooi 1 2 3 4 Fukushima Daiichi Fukushima Daini 1 2 3 4 Shimane Genkai 1 2 Tokai No.2 1 1 2 3 4 Sendai Ikata 1 2 1 2 3 Hamaoka 3 4 5 Non-operational incl. regular check-ups NPPs affected by earthquake and tsunami 7

Total deposition of Cs-134 and Cs-137 on the ground surface - Reflecting the results of the fourth airborne monitoring - ( As of December 16, 2011 ) Fukushima Daiichi NPP 134 Cs / 137 Cs (Bq/m 2 ) Nov 5, 2011 Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and U.S. Department of Energy http://radioactivity.mext.go.jp/ja/contents/5000/4901/24/1910_1216.pdf 8 Items Number of Measurement 0-50Bq/kg 50-100Bq/kg > 100Bq/kg Wheat and Barley 404 404 0 0 Vegetables 7,744 7,743 1 0 Fruits 1,039 1,032 7 0 Pulse 958 865 56 37 Mushrooms & NOT on the market 3,747 3,425 178 Wild edible plants 144 FY Regulation of food contamination Radioactivity levels of agricultural products in 17 prefectures Number of Measurement Vegetables 0-50 Bq/kg 50-100 Bq/kg > 100 Bq/kg 2011 12,671 12,130 156 385 2012 18,570 18,555 10 5 2013 7,744 7,743 1 0 Reference : Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries website 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% FY 2011 2012 2013 (April 2013 to July 2013) > 100 Bq / kg 50-100 Bq / kg 0-50 Bq / kg Standard limits for Radioactive cesium Category Limit (Bq / kg) Drinking water 10 Milk 50 General Foods 100 Infant Foods 50 (Date of enforcement : April 1, 2012) 9

After NPP accident (at early phase) Inhalation Internal Contamination Intake of Contaminated Foods Nuclear Power Plant Accident Radiation Plume External Exposure Surface Fallout Food Chain Environmental Contamination 10 Dose rates in Fukushima Gunma μsv/h Saitama μsv/h Chiba μsv/h Tokyo μsv/h Kanagawa μsv/h ( As of September 16, 2013) http://fukushima-radioactivity.jp/ 11

Dose rates in nature μsv / h 100 10 1 67 Space 24 On space shuttle 7 Cosmic radiation during flights (Tokyo-San Fransisco) 0.02-1.3 Sweden ー Before March 11, 2011 ー 0.1 0.15 top of Mt. Fuji 0.15 Radon hot springs 0.01 0.03 Tokyo 12 Medical Response at NIRS 13

Radiation Emergency Medical Assistance Team (REMAT) 2011 March 12 Fukushima Daiichi NPP 2011 March 12 8:10 am (17 hr after the earthquake) REMAT was dispatched from NIRS to Fukushima by a helicopter of JSDF 14 At off-site command center in Okuma-machi (from 12 to 15 March) No electricity No water supply Combined Disaster Damage to lifelines Internet Mobile phone Facsimile Telephone Satellite phone (2 lines) 15

Combined disaster High tide Flood Heavy snowfall Heavy rain Storm Release of Radiation Earthquake Disasters Ship accident Tsunami Volcano eruption Other natural phenomenon Fire or wildfire Explosion Others (train, plane) 16 Evacuation & Sheltering 52,277 people have left the Fukushima Prefecture (As of August 12, 2013, Fukushima Prefecture) http://wwwcms.pref.fukushima.jp/pcp_portal/portalservlet?next_display_id=u000004&contents_id=28571 17

Evacuation & sheltering (1) March 11 14:46 Earthquake 21:23 Evacuation of residents within 3 km radius from Unit 1 of 1F NPP March 12 5:44 Evacuation within 10 km radius from 1F NPP 15:36 Hydrogen explosion at Unit 1 17:39 Evacuation within 10 km radius from 2F NPP 18:25 Evacuation within 20 km radius from 1F NPP March 13 Evacuation of patients at hospitals and facilities was arranged. Most of them were reallocated to outside hospitals. However, approximately 700 patients remained left within the 20 km zone. 0:47 Emergency evacuation was issued for patients in hospitals and facilities within the 20 km zone 11:01 Second hydrogen explosion at Unit 3 Eleven workers got injured. 18 Evacuation & sheltering (2) March 15 March 25 Indoor stay was directed to the residents from 20 to 30 km radius from 1F NPP 6:00 Explosion of Units 2 & 4 occurred Radiation level soared from 0.09 in am to 24.08 μsv/hour in the evening in Fukushima 11:00 In-house evacuation from 20 km to 30 km from 1F NPP 15:00 Evacuation of all residents within 20 km zone was completed The Chief Cabinet Secretary asked voluntary evacuations for the residents within the area from 20 km to 30 km from 1F NPP 19

Contamination & Its Criteria for Screening 20 Changing the cut-off criteria for screening If the cut-off criteria for decontamination was 13, 000 cpm (as 131 I 40Bq/cm 2 ), many evacuees had to be decontaminated. However, At the shelter, evacuees were unable to ; Remove their clothes due to very low temperature Change their clothes due to no clean clothes Receive decontamination due to no water supply Therefore, Changing the criteria was necessitated : 13,000 cpm 100,000 cpm 21

Is 100,000 cpm appropriate as cut-off value for public? 100,000 cpm 400 Bq/cm 2 of I-131 and 1 μsv/h at 10 cm IAEA EPR-First Responders 2006 Manual for First Responders to a Radiological Emergency Skin and clothing contamination criteria for determining if decontamination is warranted; > 1 μsv/h at 10 cm (ambient dose rate) 22 Medical problem & Contaminated Workers at TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP 23

Activities of NIRS 24 Training courses for fire departments in Fukushima prefecture Fire Department Date No. of participants No. of sending experts Futaba Area Sep 21-22, 2011 83 4 Soma Area Oct 3-4, 2011 50 3 Iwaki City Oct 28, 2011 32 4 Fukushima City Nov 28-29, 2011 80 5 Aizu Area (Kitakata, Aizuwakamatsu, Minamiaizu) Feb 2, 2012 147 4 Shirakawa Area Feb 3, 2012 51 4 Date City Mar 16, 2012 50 4 25

Screening of radiation for workers/residents at NIRS Checking body surface (As of February 22, 2013) TEPCO First responders 2,430 persons Governments Residents 331 persons Dose assessment / Decontamination Responders at NPP(JSDF 1, TEPCO 10) (March 14, 25 / May 30 / June 10, 20, 24 / June 1) 26 NIRS response to the disaster 500 450 3/24 I-131 concentration in tap water decreased to below regulation level & 3 workers were heavily contaminated 400 350 No. of calls 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 27

Access for the website of NIRS 3/16 Radiation dose rate elevated sharply around the main gate of 1F & SDF helicopter sprayed seawater 3/24 I-131 concentration in tap water decreased to below regulation level & 3 workers were heavily contaminated 3/25 Three heavily contaminated workers were transferred to NIRS 3/23 I-131 concentration of tap water exceeded the regulation level Before Accident: ~ 20,000 access per day Temporary house-visits operation Evacuees had a strong desire to return home temporarily to retrieve their belongings or check on their homes, farms, and businesses. 1. Allowed from May 10, 2011 2. Limited to 2 to 5 h to keep radiation exposure to 1 msv or lower 3. Only two persons per household 4. Not allowed for residents < 15 years old and senior citizens 5. Cannot not bring out food or farm animals except pets 6. Radiation surveys and medical care 29

Number of evacuees from restricted area Total about 78,200 people Katsurao-mura 300 Tamura city 600 20k m Minamisouma City 14,300 Namie town 19,600 Futaba 6,900 Ookuma 11,500 Kawauchi-mura 1100 http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chousa/kaihatu/016/attach/ icsfiles/afieldfile/2011/04/18/1305143_1 Tomioka 16,000 Naraha 7700 30 Flowchart of temporary house visit 20 km Restricted area Evacuation center Relay station Meeting place Meeting place Stay only 2 hours Survey member Safety manager 31

Summary 32 Summary (1) Radiation can not be seen, heard, smelt, or felt, & does not cause immediate symptoms. Public do not understand radiation and its effects. 33

Summary (2) There are no workers, operational staff, or emergency response personnel requiring treatment for radiation exposure or contamination with radioactive materials Basic education on radiation is essential for its use and also protection, since radiation is widely used in society 34 Summary (3) Basic education on radiation is essential for its use and also protection, since radiation is widely used in society Opportunity for obtaining basic knowledge of radiation is important in school 35