UK household giving new results on regional trends

Similar documents
The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The performance of Scotland s high growth companies

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Chapter 1: The Population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

East West Rail Consortium

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

The regional value of tourism in the UK: 2013

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

NOT FOR BROADCAST OR PUBLICATION BEFORE HRS Saturday 26 th January 2013

The impacts of proposed changes in Air Passenger Duty

August Briefing. Why airport expansion is bad for regional economies

Inverness, Culloden and Suburbs Settlement Economic Overview

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

SURVEY OF U3A MEMBERS (PART 1)

CAA Passenger Survey Report 2005

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

NHBC NEW HOME STATISTICS REVIEW Q1 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

In July 2015, Scotland s First Minister announced the Scotland s commitment to sign up to the SDGs.

Construction Industry Focus Survey. Sample

Mali Jenkins Fund January December 2011

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

REPORT. VisitEngland 2010 Business Confidence Monitor. Wave 1 New Year

EXAMINING THE WIDER CONTEXT OF RAIL-AIR COMPETITION BETWEEN SCOTLAND AND ENGLAND & WALES. Ross Clark Rail Performance Manager Transport Scotland

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Financial Scrutiny Unit Briefing Tourism in Scotland

Taking Part 2015/16: WEST MIDLANDS

Regional differences and their importance for the UK economy

Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015

The Changing Face of the High Street. Martin Blackwell Chief Executive ATCM

Regional Universities Network. Introduction. Regional Universities Network. Economic Impact of the Universities in the Regional Universities Network

Analysis of the latest GSPC House Sales Data

LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report

Market Monitor. Half Year Review

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Future of Air Transport

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

UCAS Conservatoires End of Cycle 2017 Data Resources

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Home affordability in cities at its worst since 2008

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Civil Aviation Authority:

Gwynedd and Anglesey Housing and the Welsh Language Survey

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

Go West: West and Central Scotland house prices per square metre fastest growing over last five years

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Tourist Traffic in the City of Rijeka For the Period Between 2004 and 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

CAA Passenger Survey Report 2017

An Eighth report on Local Authority Staff Resources

Feature Article. Equally, counting up all employment in. conversely, that not all employment in. if industry sales rely in part

WAVERLEY TOPS ANNUAL RURAL AREAS QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY

Scotland s Water Industry: Past, Present and Future

Devonport-Takapuna Local Board Profile

Patterns of housing wealth inequality in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland

Holiday Habits Report. ABTA Consumer Survey 2015

Caravan & Camping Park Sector Annual Report 2011

Puerto Ricans in Rhode Island, the United States, and Puerto Rico, 2013

LONDON HIGHER FACTSHEET 2011

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

T A S M A N I A N G A M B L I N G S E I S I S S U E S P A P E R. Background on the Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Employment characteristics of UK tourism industries in 2008

York destination report

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY* July December 2015

Civil Aviation Authority: UK Aviation Consumer Survey. Key Findings. Autumn 2018

Criteria for an application for and grant of, or variation to, an ATOL: Financial

Estimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism

Embargoed until 30/03/2012

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

Breakthrough Glasgow February 2008

(Also known as the Den-Ice Agreements Program) Evaluation & Advisory Services. Transport Canada

00: Not for broadcast or publication before 00:01 Hrs Monday 20th June 2011

Revalidation: data from the first five years

Employment and Skills Briefing (March 2015)

SOCIAL ENTERPRISE IN EDINBURGH: PEOPLE, PROFIT AND PLACE

1. Output GVA data for LEPs , ONS Feb 2016

Regional Spread of Inbound Tourism. VisitBritain Research, August 2018

Population analysis of North West London for John Lyon s Charity

HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY

Rail passengers priorities for improvement November 2017

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

Tuesday 6 June 2017 Afternoon Time allowed: 2 hours

NOT FOR BROADCAST OR PUBLICATION BEFORE 00:01, TUESDAY 1 MARCH 2016

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

Methodology and coverage of the survey. Background

Contents. Global outlook. UK economic prospects. The outlook for consumer spending and the impact of automation. Regional growth trends and prospects

Affordability of city homes hits ten-year low

Domestic Tourism to South West Wales in 2006, 2007 and 2008 Factsheet

COUNTRY CASE STUDIES: OVERVIEW

THE LOCAL IMPACT OF THE UK BEER AND PUB SECTOR

Destination Visitor Survey Strategic Regional Research Queensland: Understanding the Queensland Touring Group

Thessaloniki Chamber of Commerce & Industry TCCI BAROMETER. March Palmos Analysis. March 11

Crown copyright Published with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty s Stationery Office (HMSO). ISBN ISSN

The Geography of Tourism Employment

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first

Transcription:

CGAP Briefing Note 6 UK household giving new results on regional trends 01 08 July 10 Tom McKenzie and Cathy Pharoah In a climate of growing political emphasis on charitable activity at local levels, this briefing note presents results from a comparison of patterns and trends in giving by UK region and country. Fundraisers at national charities need to understand who makes donations in which parts of the country for their strategic planning. Mapping donor behaviour geographically can enhance such understanding of the market for donations. Yet few previous studies have provided detail on giving by region in the UK. This note makes a contribution by considering both the propensity to donate and actual amounts donated to evaluate charitable generosity in different areas of the United Kingdom. Examining data on over 50,000 households pooled from eight years of the national Living Costs and Food Survey (LCF), 1 answers are sought to the following questions: How far does charitable giving by UK households vary across the regions? How important is income in explaining differences between regions? How do the trends in charitable giving at the regional level compare with other forms of giving? Regional giving in the United Kingdom The following map displays the proportion of households that made a donation to charity during a two week spending diary period, by government office region. As can be seen, there are some striking differences. Households in Northern Ireland are nearly twice as likely to donate as those located in Wales, the West Midlands and North East England, where only 25.1 per cent recorded making a gift to charity. This result may be due to July 10 CGAP Briefing Note 6 UK household giving new results on regional trends 01 08 1

the relative importance of religion in Northern Ireland. 2 Previous studies show that people who consider religion important in their lives are more likely to give to charity. 3 Proportionately more households in Scotland and southern and eastern England give compared with the East Midlands, north west England and Yorkshire and Humberside. 29.5% 46.2% 25.1% 28.2% 27.7% 27.4% 25.1% 25.1% 30.5% 31.7% 31.4% 28.5% Differences exist within the regions that are masked by these aggregate figures. London is a case in point. As a whole, Londoners rank in the middle, with 28.5 per cent of households giving to charity. In the table below, the capital is divided into four areas; figures range from 23.8 per cent of households in north east London to 33.9 per cent in south west London. When considering the amounts 4 donated, the pattern is different. Donors in north west London tend to give more, both in absolute terms (the median gift is a whole 1 higher than elsewhere in the capital) and as a proportion of their total expenditure (over 2 per cent). Per cent donating Mean donation (donors only) Median donation (donors only) Donations, per cent of total spending (donors only) North east London 23.8 7.51 3.12 1.51 North west London 27.4 11.55 4.12 2.17 South east London 30.1 7.84 3.03 1.39 South west London 33.9 10.60 3.01 1.62 2 CGAP Briefing Note 6 UK household giving new results on regional trends 01 08 July 10

Giving by nation and income The differences presented above may be explained to a large extent by variation in income. Households on higher incomes are more likely to give to charity so the participation rate is expected to be lower in poorer parts of the country. In all four nations, there is a strong positive link between income and the propensity to give. Indeed, as the next chart shows, across England, Scotland and Wales, participation levels by income decile are very similar. Therefore, if differences in income were taken into account, the map on the previous page for the proportion of households donating in Great Britain would become more homogeneous. However, proportionately more households in Northern Ireland donate to charity, regardless of income. Donor households in the UK Proportion donating (%), by nation 60 40 Northern Ireland Scotland Wales England 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Income decile Giving by nation across time Donor households in the UK Proportion donating (%), by nation 50 40 50 30 40 30 10 10 0 01 0 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Year Northern Ireland Scotland England Wales When the proportions of households donating are plotted over time, participation in giving in Northern Ireland and Wales is shown to have declined gently between 01 and 08. In England and Scotland, the proportions have held steady at around 30 per cent. This is a particularly important result given that participation in giving in Great Britain was shown to decline substantially between 1974 and 1994. 5 This downward trend for Great Britain appears to have slowed in the last decade. July 10 CGAP Briefing Note 6 UK household giving new results on regional trends 01 08 3

Regional donations to charity in England over time The steady pattern for all of England also holds true when the figures are disaggregated to the regional level. The following chart shows the trend lines for the different regions of England as well as the overall trend line for England as a whole (dashed line). Although participation in giving declined in some regions and increased in others, the changes are not statistically significant. The proportion of households donating to charity in the English regions remained stable between 01 and 08. Donor households in England Proportion donating (%), by region Fitted values 35 30 25 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Year North East Yorks & Humber West Midlands London South West North West East Midlands Eastern South East All English regions Other forms of giving in England over time While the proportions of the population in England making charitable donations have remained stable over the past decade, the pattern for sending money abroad, which includes gifts by migrant households to people in their countries of origin, 6 has changed and the trends are different depending on the region. Households in London are more likely than households in other regions of England to send money abroad. However between 01 and 08, the proportion of London households remitting money declined, while there was a marked rise in the West Midlands and eastern England. 7 This may be a reflection of the sharp increase in migrant workers from eastern Europe who settled in the English regions outside London when the European Union expanded in 04 and 07. Remitter households in England Proportion donating (%), by region Fitted values 15 10 5 0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Year North East Yorks & Humber West Midlands London South West North West East Midlands Eastern South East All English regions July 10 CGAP Briefing Note 6 UK household giving new results on regional trends 01 08 4

Summary of findings and possible implications This briefing note has shown that the proportion of households who make a donation to charity varies substantially between the nations of the United Kingdom and across the regions of England. Households in Northern Ireland and Scotland as well as in southern and eastern England are more likely to donate than those in other parts of the UK. While much of the variation may be explained by different income levels, other factors are also important. Numbers of households donating in Northern Ireland are higher than the rest of the UK across all income groups, reflecting a strong culture of giving there. The sub regional analysis of London demonstrates that areas where more people give to charity are not always the same as those where donors give higher amounts of money. This raises the question of how to define relative levels of generosity between regions. The proportion of the local population that gives represents a different measure for this than the percentage of income that is given by donors to charity. Although the trend in giving to charity appears to have remained stable over the past decade, there have been developments in the different regions regarding the proportions of households sending money abroad, so called remittance giving. While this has declined in the London area, it has increased in the rest of south eastern England, as well as in East Anglia and the West Midlands. The findings suggest that if giving is to be increased in the UK, it is important for both fundraisers and policymakers to develop a better understanding of local cultures and traditions of giving. Strategy needs to be adapted to local capacity as well as willingness to give. References Banks, James and Tanner, Sarah (1997) The State of Donation: Household Gifts to Charity, 1974 96, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London. Available at www.ifs.org.uk/ comms/comm62.pdf Pharoah, Cathy and Tanner, Sarah (1997) Trends in Charitable Giving Fiscal Studies 18 (4), pp 427 43. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) for providing the data. The ONS bears no responsibility for the further analysis and interpretation presented in this paper. All existing errors remain those of the current authors. 1 Covering the years 01 to 08 gave a total sample of 51944 households. 2 In the 01 Census, only 13.8 per cent of the population in Northern Ireland did not state their religion or claimed not to belong to any religion. This compares with a figure of 22.52 per cent for England and Wales (UK 01 Census, tables KS07 and KS07a). 3 See for example Pharoah and Tanner (1997, pp 439 40). 4 The amounts quoted in this briefing note are in June 10 pounds. 5 See Banks and Tanner (1997). 6 The variable for remitting correlates very highly with the variable to indicate households of non white British ethnicity. 7 These results are statistically significant (p = 0.01). 5 CGAP Briefing Note 6 UK household giving new results on regional trends 01 08 July 10

About the authors Tom McKenzie is a research officer specialising in economic analysis. At CGAP he focuses on patterns of giving in the UK using national household survey data. Tom graduated with a degree in economics from the University of Bonn and taught personnel economics at the University of Cologne before joining Cass Business School in 09. Cathy Pharoah is professor of charity funding at Cass Business School and co director of CGAP Hub. Research work includes an annual report on family foundation giving, supported by the Pears Foundation, as well as the Charity Market Monitor published by CaritasData, an annual update on the finances of the UK s major fundraising charities. Cathy has published many other reports on aspects of charity funding. She is treasurer of the Voluntary Sector Studies Network (VSSN), and a member of the editorial board of Voluntary Sector Review. About CGAP The ESRC Centre for Charitable Giving and Philanthropy (CGAP) is the first academic centre in the UK dedicated to research on charitable giving and philanthropy. Three main research strands focus on individual and business giving, social redistribution and charitable activity, and the institutions of giving. CGAP is a consortium comprising Cass Business School, University of Edinburgh Business School, University of Kent, University of Southampton, University of Strathclyde Business School and NCVO. CGAP s coordinating hub is based at Cass Business School. CGAP is funded by the ESRC, the Office for Civil Society, the Scottish Government and Carnegie UK Trust. For further information on CGAP, visit www.cgap.org.uk 6 CGAP Briefing Note 6 UK household giving new results on regional trends 01 08 July 10