Validation Plan & Objectives. Maik Friedrich, DLR PJ05 Braunschweig, 22 of November 2017

Similar documents
Remote towers at your service. First validation of remote tower for multiple airports (PJ05)

Contextual note SESAR Solution description form for deployment planning

SESAR Solutions at ATC Global Surface Management

The Effects of the Introduction of Free Route (HUFRA) in the Hungarian Airspace

Contextual note SESAR Solution description form for deployment planning

Disruptive Technologies in Air Traffic Management

SESAR Solutions. Display Options

Follow-the-Greens: The Controllers Point of View Results from a SESAR Real Time Simulation with Controllers

CASCADE OPERATIONAL FOCUS GROUP (OFG)

REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS SYMPOSIUM March Detect and Avoid. DI Gerhard LIPPITSCH. ICAO RPAS Panel Detect & Avoid Rapporteur

TERMS OF REFERENCE FREDERICTON AIRSPACE REVIEW

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

ATC Training Syllabus Philippines vacc Version 1.1 September 25, 2016

ART Workshop Airport Capacity

THE TOWER CONTROL POSITION (TWR)

RUNWAY SAFETY GO-TEAM METHODOLOGY

RACOON PROJECT Daniele Teotino - ENAV. RACOON Project Manager Head of SESAR JU Activity Coordination

Screening Chapter 14 Transport. Single European Sky (SES) 18 December Transport

Demonstration Report RTO

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority. Telecomm & Information Services Unit

IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY DUBLIN POINT MERGE. Presented by James O Sullivan PANS-OPS & AIRSPACE INSPECTOR Irish Aviation Authority

Final Project Report

European Airport Movement Management by A-SMGCS > a contribution to the vision 2020 and SESAR <

Effective: AUSTRALIAN INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW AVALON 2019, AVALON AIRPORT 19 FEBRUARY - 5 MARCH 2019, IFR OPERATIONS AVALON AIRPORT

Considerations for Facility Consolidation

HungaroControl. More than an Air Navigation Service Provider

Using Segmented Standard Taxi Routes to Integrate Unmanned Aircraft Systems at Civil Airports

HungaroControl Csaba GERGELY

AIRSAW TF Status Report

DEMORPAS Project. Final Dissemination Forum. 10th March 2016, World ATM Congress, Madrid

Burlington ATCT Standard Operating Procedures

PBN and airspace concept

Real-time Simulations to Evaluate the RPAS Integration in Shared Airspace

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

CONTROLLED AIRSPACE CONTAINMENT POLICY

Air Law. Iain Darby NAPC/PH-NSIL IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

COLLISION AVOIDANCE FOR RPAS

Multi Profile Training Areas. Col Azmi Al Abaddi Royal Jordanian Air Force

SAMPLE TEMPLATE APPENDIX 3.5C-1

SESAR Delivering Digital Remote Tower Solutions

RED ATLAS PRODUCT BROCHURE. From Nevalee Business Solutions

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT INDIA S PERSPECTIVE. Vineet Gulati GM(ATM-IPG), AAI

Guidance for Complexity and Density Considerations - in the New Zealand Flight Information Region (NZZC FIR)

Automation Dependency. Ensuring Robust Performance in Unexpected Situations Sunjoo Advani, IDT

ATC automation: facts and steps ahead

Notice of Proposed Amendment Technical and operational requirements for remote tower operations

What is Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)?

RPAS INTEGRATION INTO EU AIRSPACE. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE On CIVIL RPAS OPERATIONS

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

Appendix F ICAO MODEL RUNWAY INCURSION INITIAL REPORT FORM

Airspace Complexity Measurement: An Air Traffic Control Simulation Analysis

Air Traffic Management and Space Transportation System Wide Information Management and Integration into European Airspace

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../...

Official Journal of the European Union L 186/27

APPENDIX F AIRSPACE INFORMATION

NextGen Priorities: Multiple Runway Operations & RECAT

REGULATION No. 10/2011 ON APPROVAL OF FLIGHT PROCEDURES INCLUDING SID-s AND STAR-s. Article 1 Scope of Application

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 3 Presentation 1

2012 Performance Framework AFI

UAS in European Civil Airspace: USICO and SINUE Results

WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY. Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World

PROJECT LSD IAA REMOTE TOWER. 28 th /29 th November 2018 Cranfield

European Joint Industry CDA Action Plan

Safety / Performance Criteria Agreeing Assumptions Module 10 - Activities 5 & 6

1 LOCAL TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS

Large Airtanker Scenario (Scenario 1: Regional Fire)

OPERATIONS MANUAL PART A

Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace (AFUA) Kris DELCOURTE, EUROCONTROL Davide BARDELLI, LUFTHANSA SYSTEMS

IVAO Switzerland Division

LSSIP Year 2011 Cyprus Part III - Chapter 15-1 Released Issue

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

AEROTHAI Air Traffic Management Network Management Centre IATA ICAO Cross Border ATFM Workshop

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE DRAFT REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGENDA ITEM 4

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY SAFETY REGULATION CHECKLIST FOR INSPECTION OF SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE CONTROL SYSTEM (SMGCS)

FLIGHT OPERATIONS PANEL (FLTOPSP)

WORKSHOP 1 ICAO RPAS Panel Working Group 1 Airworthiness

In order to start practical Tower controller training at Oslo Gardermoen, a student must meet the following requirements:

Ground movement safety systems and procedures - an overview

A-CDM FOR REGIONAL AIRPORTS CONCEPT VALIDATION DOCUMENTO PÚBLICO

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

Air Traffic Flow & Capacity Management Frederic Cuq

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

DFS Aviation Services GmbH. A brand of experience

Runway Incursion Preventive measures at aircraft level

Work Programme of ICAO Panels and Study Groups

The SESAR Airport Concept

Evaluation of Pushback Decision-Support Tool Concept for Charlotte Douglas International Airport Ramp Operations

Optimizing trajectories over the 4DWeatherCube

Work of the ACI World Safety and Technical Standing committee(wstsc) - PP Singh, Chair STSC & Head Safety, Compliance & Enforcement DIAL,IGI Airport

RUNWAY INCURSION PREVENTION MEASURES AT PARIS-CHARLES DE GAULLE AIRPORT

Workshop Exercise, EGYPT Air Navigation Plan 10 /12/2010

The pilot and airline operator s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options. Session 2 Presentation 2

- Define temporary airspace structures and procedures to offer multiple airspace

TRAINING BULLETIN No. 1

PREDANNACK AD LOCATION INDICATOR AND NAME PREDANNACK PREDANNACK AD AERODROME GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA. 2nm SE of Mullion.

L 342/20 Official Journal of the European Union

Teaching the National Airspace System. Soaring Safety Foundation FIRC Presentation

THE AREA CONTROL CENTRE (CTR) POSITION

Transcription:

Validation Plan & Objectives Maik Friedrich, DLR PJ05 Braunschweig, 22 of November 2017

Validation Plan Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 2

Remote Tower PJ.05 DLR (AT-One) Remotely Provided Air Traffic Service for Multiple Aerodromes for up to three airports PJ.05.02 Highly Flexible Allocation of Aerodromes to Multiple Remote Tower Modules PJ.05.03 Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 3

Operational Environment Services Staffing Airspace TWR Opening Hours Number of ATS staff Airspace Classification Control Zone Procedures Environment Including Clearance delivery / Ground Control / Tower Control / TWR Apron Control Up to 24H (including night) One ATCO per MRTM More than one ATCO in the RTC, including MRTMs and RTC Supervisor Class C and/or D 10-15 NM radius/rectangular, Vertical extension up to 3000 ft MSL Specific IFR routes & approach procedures Established VFR routes Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 4

Traffic volume Time of day Traffic complexity Visibility conditions Key parameters for Solution 2 Traffic distribution Wind conditions Operational modes Runway directions Runway conditions Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 5

EXE-05.02-V2-2.4 - HC ATS provided to three small size aerodromes including a military aerodrome real-time simulation Validation platform is the DLR NARSIM, extended by Frequentis and SELEX A set of 4 scenarios (Scenario) Airport A Airport B Airport C Airport name Pápa (military) Debrecen (civil) RWY 1 Budapest IFR flights / VFR 100 % / 0 % 70 % / 30 %C 50 % / 50 % flights Ground movements per hour 1 2 16 Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 6

Overview Scenario Scenario ID Number of airports Duration mvmt/hr Mixture Use Cases Training 2 (LHBP-LHPA) 40 min 20 mix VFR (20%)/IFR (80%) 1;6 Scenario 1 3 50 min 20 mainlyifr - VFR (10%)/IFR (90%) 1;2;3;4;5;6; 7;8 Scenario 2 3 50 min 20 mix VFR (20%)/IFR (80%) 1;2;3;4;5;6; 7;8 Scenario 3 3 50 min 30 mainlyifr - VFR (10%)/IFR (90%) 1;2;3;4;5;6; 7;8 Scenario 4 3 50 min 30 mix VFR (20%)/IFR (80%) 1;2;3;4;5;6; 7;8 Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 7

Team Procedere Begin End Day One Day Two 9:00 9:30 Briefing Briefing 9:30 10:30 Training Scenario3 10:30 11:30 Training Scenario2 11:30 12:30 Scenario1 Scenario4 12:30 13:30 Lunch Lunch 13:30 14:30 Scenario4 Scenario1 14:30 15:30 Scenario2 15:30 16:30 Scenario3 Debriefing 16:30 17:00 Debriefing/Short Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 8

PJ05-02 Use Cases NORMAL CONDITIONS UC 1:1 / Provide ATS with simultaneous movements (ground and air) at different aerodromes from one MRTM UC 1:2 / Provide ATS to co-operative RPAS and normal aircraft to different aerodromes UC 1:3 / Control of Vehicles in the Manoeuvring Area to different aerodromes UC 1:4 / Provide ATS to simultaneous landings at different aerodromes UC 1:5 / Provide ATS to simultaneous departures at different aerodromes UC 1:6 / Provide ATS to a landing and a departing aircraft simultaneously at different aerodromes UC 1:7 / VFR flight in the traffic circuit with an arriving IFR flight with simultaneous movements on another aerodrome UC 1:8 / Ensure that the ATCO is able to avoid task overload, ATCO able to prioritize and control traffic to reduce current workload, e.g. RWY incursion, several simultaneous VFR arrivals, aircraft with malfunction Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 9

Validation Objectives Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 10

Validation Objectives Validation Objectives Number of Success criteria HUMAN PERFORMANCE SITUATION AWARENESS 4 HUMAN PERFORMANCE WORKLOAD 1 HUMAN PERFORMANCE ACCEPTANCE OF OPERATING METHODS / ROLES 3 HUMAN PERFORMANCE USABILITY and UTILITY 3 SAFETY - GENERAL 2 SAFETY 3 CAPACITY 1 COST EFFICIENCY 1 Each success criteria has to be measured with a metric Can be independent from the scenario or at the end in the final debriefing Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 11

Success criteria for HUMAN PERFORMANCE SITUATION AWARENESS Success criteria ID Success criteria Description Covered by Mid - Run Post Run Debriefing / Interview CRT-PJ05.02-V2- VALP-H02-010 CRT-PJ05.02-V2- VALP-H02-020 CRT-PJ05.02-V2- VALP-H02-030 CRT-PJ05.02-V2- VALP-H02-040 ATCOs situation awareness is at an acceptable level ATCOs can priorities tasks ATCOs confirm that the user interface design supports a sufficient level of individual situation awareness ATCO maintain an adequate level of SA, despite having to divide their attention to several airports with different procedures and characteristics (geographical area, urban infrastructure, weather conditions etc.) questionnaire, debrief questionnaire, debrief debrief questionnaire, debrief Modified Cooper- Harper-Scale Modified Cooper- Harper-Scale Situational Awareness for SHAPE Questionnaire (SASHA), AR25 AR01, AR02 SASHA extended, AR19 GA01, GA02 GA03, GA04, Interview06 System Usability Scale (SUS), GA05, GA06, GA07, GA08, GA29 GA10, GA30, GA31, GA32, Interview13, Interview14 Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 12

Objectives to Metrics Mid - Run ISA Scale Modified Cooper Harper Scale Post Run NASA-TLX SASHA AIM 26 Tailor maid questions Debriefing 33 Tailor maid questions 24 Open questions System Usability Scale (SUS) Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 13

Modified Cooper Harper Scale - Top Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 14

Modified Cooper Harper Scale - Body Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 15

Example Results NASA-TLX Score Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 16

Reference Documents Project Management and Administration: SESAR 1 P06.08.04-D94-OSED Single Remote TWR Ph2 Final Update SESAR 1 P06.08.04-D103-Multi Remote Advanced OSED Update (P06.09.03 D04) SESAR 1 P12.04.07-D09-Remote tower specifications-final Consolidated DEL SESAR 1 P12.04.06 / P12.04.08 final deliveries Project Management and Administration: PJ05 GA Annex 1 Part A and B SESAR 2020 Programme Execution Framework Project Hand-Book Participant Portal H2020 Online Manual Reports and payment requests (http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/grants/grantmanagement/reports_en.htm) Participant Portal H2020 Online Manual Amendments to the Grant Agreement (http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/grants/grantmanagement/amendments_en.htm) Overview of Remote Tower Activities in SESAR 2020 17

Overview of Validation Plan & Objectives in SESAR 2020 Thank you very much for your attention!