EMAR Implementation; a non-eda member states view. Wing Commander Jason Dean Directorate General Technical Airworthiness Australian Defence Force

Similar documents
Part 145 CONTINUATION TRAINING General Overview and introduction to the regulations

Update on the DASR Campaign

EASA The medium term agenda

As Military as Necessary As Civilian as Practicable. Ian Kitson QinetiQ Australia

Regulatory update Air operations

TIGER COMBAT HELICOPTER

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task

European Aviation Safety Agency. Opinion No 10/2017

2009 Europe / US International Aviation Safety Conference. ATM/aerodromes. Jussi Myllärniemi EASA Rulemaking

Workshop Biscarrosse 14 May 2010

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Requirements for Air Traffic Services (ATS)

MAWA Chairman, Eng Jan PLEVKA PhD EDA Airworthiness Project Officer. 6 th EDA Military Airworthiness Conference 2014 in Rome

Operations. Henrik Svensson TO Operations & Flight Safety European Gliding Union. From NCO OPS to Part-SAO

The regulatory challenges facing industry EASA-Thales TAC Watchkeeper Airworthiness Analysis of TAC meetings outcomes Tuesday 24 th March 4 th 2015

ACCELERATING the RECOGNITION PROCESS between AIRWORTHINESS AUTHORITIES DSAÉ

Safety Management in the Airworthiness Domain

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Fuel procedures and planning RMT.0573 ISSUE

RMT.0464 ATS Requirements

EASA COMMITTEE ADOPTION PROCEDURES (VERSION 28/10/2015) (Dates in brackets are tentative) ENTRY INTO FORCE

Recognition for Defence Aviation; what, why and how

Agenda Introduction to Swedish Military Aviation Regulations, Past and Present Total Aviation System Approach

Better regulation for general aviation (update July 2010) July 2010 Better regulation for General Aviation 1

Web conference: CRD Part-NCC Overview

Explanatory Note to Decision 2015/030/R

FCL Rulemaking update

AIRBUS FLIGHT TEST CREW MEMBERS RESPONSE to NPA and b

Assessment of Flight and Duty Time Schemes Procedure

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Implementation of Evidence-Based Training within the European regulatory framework RMT.0696 ISSUE

Explanatory Note to Decision 2013/022/R

EASA experience in SSP/SMS. Presented by Juan MORALES Intl. Cooperation Officer Prepared by Rodrigo PRIEGO Safety Mangement Team Leader

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

EASA ATM/ANS regulatory update

Air Operations Requirements. Information Session Commercial Balloon Operations Cologne, 17 February 2009

Summary Report by Activity Area for COSCAP- SA

ITALIAN MINISTRY OF DEFENCE Secretariat General for Defence - National Armaments Directorate AIR ARMAMENTS DIRECTORATE

Recognition - What Next?

European Military Aviation Requirements:

TWINNING EGYPT ITALY STRENGTHENING THE AVIATION OVERSIGHT STANDARDS OF THE EGYPTIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

JOINT AUTHORITIES FOR RULEMAKING OF UNMANNED SYSTEMS. Julia Sanchez on behalf of WG 1 Leader Benny Davidor 1

Workshop Seaplanes AERO 2011

SESAR Active ECAC ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 REG ASP MIL APO USE INT IND NM

Airworthiness Regulatory Framework for Military Civil RPAS. Lt Col (Eng) Georgios Kokkalas

Declaration and List of Approvals for EASA Part- NCC and Part-SPO Operators

Sistema EASA para Operaciones. Seminario EASA NPA OPS Madrid, Mayo 2009

DISCUSSION PAPER EASA NPA IMPLEMENTING RULES COMMUNITY OPERATORS FOR AIR OPERATIONS OF. at

RMT.0464 ATS Requirements The NPA

ENVIRONMENT ACTION PLAN

EASA rulemaking in ATM/ANS. Entry Point North annual AFIS Seminar 5th and 6th of September 2012, Malmö

JOINT AUTHORITIES FOR RULEMAKING OF UNMANNED SYSTEMS. Mike Lissone Secretary General JARUS

Terms of Reference for rulemaking task RMT.0704

Unmanned Aircraft: Regulatory Framework in the EU EASA team High Level Conference on Drones Warsaw 24 November 2016

APPROVED TRAINING ORGANISATIONS & FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICES

EFB Users Forum EASA EFB latest development

5 Years On From The Haddon-Cave Report; A Reflection And A Look Ahead. Commodore Malcolm Toy, Head of Regulation and Certification

DRAFT COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX. laying down rules and procedures for the operation of unmanned aircraft

NNF Work-shop on Navigation, Safety and Technology. Dato: 2. February Gunn Marit Hernes Luftfartstilsynet

EUROPEAN MILITARY AIRWORTHINESS DOCUMENT EMAD 1 DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS DOCUMENT

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority SAFETY DIRECTIVE. Validation of Non-Seychelles licenses issued by States other than the Seychelles

Implementation of Safety-Management-Systems (SMS)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

FSD/OPERATIONS SECTION INFORMATION BULLETIN

Reference No: Issue Issue Date: 16/02/2018 Area : FCL

SESAR Active ECAC INF07 REG ASP MIL APO USE INT IND NM

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs)

AFI Plan Aerodromes Certification Project Workshop for ESAF Region (Nairobi, Kenya, August 2016)

ICAO Regulatory Framework and Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme

AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTS FOR AIR OPERATIONS

Terms of reference for a rulemaking task

Presentation Title: Aerodromes Licensing Requirements

AVIATION MRO FUTURE POST 2020

Athens International Airport

ICAO regional technical cooperation tools for the implementation of air navigation and safety improvements

Introduction. Content. Training Course NAA Inspectors Training Course - Flight Operations Inspector. Location(s) / Date(s) List price

PBN, ADQ, ADQ2 IR EUROCONTROL Activities Status

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS): regulatory framework and challenges. NAM/CAR/SAM Civil - Military Cooperation Havana, Cuba, April 2015

TIGER COMBAT HELICOPTER

of 26 August 2010 for a Commission Regulation XXX/2010 laying down Implementing Rules for Pilot Licensing

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority SAFETY DIRECTIVE. This Safety Directive contains information that is intended for mandatory compliance.

Certification Procedure

Aspects on Local regulations vs EASA rules

Terms of Reference for rulemaking task RMT.0325 (OPS.057(a)) & RMT.0326 (OPS.057(b))

Diversity of Canadian Military Airworthiness Authority experiences and challenges. 26 Sep 2012 Kirk Shaw RDIMS#

Application for Approval, OPS Dry lease-in

Civil Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) Regulations in Australia

Safety Management 1st edition

Aviation Training Catalogue

Session 2.2 Data Catalogue

Andres Lainoja Eesti Lennuakadeemia

The type rating of test pilots having flown the aircraft for its development and certification needs to be addressed as a special case.

Single European Sky II

Rulemaking progress on RPAS:

ANNEX TO EASA OPINION 09/2013. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX

AFI PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION REGIONAL GROUP TWENTY FIRST MEETING (APIRG/21) (Nairobi, Kenya (9 to 11 October 2017)

FINAL REPORT OF THE USOAP CMA AUDIT OF THE CIVIL AVIATION SYSTEM OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY

MID-SST/3-PPT/5 USOAP CMA UPDATE

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /

Euromed Civil Aviation II project

JANUARY 2016 Part One Consultation

Transcription:

EMAR Implementation; a non-eda member states view Wing Commander Jason Dean Directorate General Technical Airworthiness Australian Defence Force Military Airworthiness Conference Oct 2015

Scope Why would a non-eda member state be interested in EMAR? Challenges with EMAR Implementation Australian Context and EMAR Implementation Additional EMAR challenges for a non-eda member state

Why would any Military implement new Regulation? Hardest sell for non-eda member state is what s in it for us? Why would a non-eda member state allocate resources on the implementation of EMAR?

What is Good Aviation Regulation? Published a book identifying what makes good Aviation Regulation regulation: 10 Ways to Better Aviation Regulation

Why EMAR? - What else is out there? Civil International Civil Aviation Authority Military International Common Military Regulations/Policy For Air, Land and Sea Materiel

What are the challenges of EMAR implementation? Convincing senior military leaders to implement a European Military Aviation Regulatory Framework i.e. EMAR for a non-eda Member State Very little information exists on the quantitative benefits (time/cost) of EMAR High level compelling reasons as to why a non-eda member state may want to implement EMAR need to be established (context dependent)

Australian Context Australian Defence Aviation Safety Regulations Legislation and Policy (Defence Act 1903 and DI(G) OPS 2-2) Military Aviation Regulations (AAP7001.048) Technical Aviation Safety Regulations* (established mid 1990s) Operational Aviation Safety Regulations (established late 1990s) * Organisational approvals for Engineering and Maintenance Unique Terms, Definitions, Artefacts, etc

Australian EMAR Implementation decision Evaluation of EMAR benefits and the merit of a new aviation framework Compared existing Australian Technical Aviation Regulations to EMAR and vice versa EMAR broadly satisfied safety assurance outcomes Australian shortfalls existed in MTC management aspects, Continuing Airworthiness (elements of), Production (robustness of) Compared existing Australian Operational Aviation Safety Regulations to ICAO based regulation sets i.e. FAA, EASA, Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority, etc Developed Business Case EMAR is the emerging military global convention Senior Defence engagement Senior Bureaucrats, Australian Chief of Air Force (3 star) Conclusion New Australian Defence Aviation Safety Regulation (DASR) is warranted Model off EASA framework Will include Technical Aviation Regulations from EMAR (adopt/adapt) and remainder of EASA structure

EMAR implementation options Australian EMAR implementation to be titled Defence Aviation Safety Regulation (DASR) EMAR Part 21: Adopt and titled DASR 21 EMAR Part M: Adopt and titled DASR M EMAR Part 145 : Adopt and titled DASR 145 EMAR 66*: Adapt and titled DASR 66 EMAR Part 147*: Adapt and titled DASR 147 Adopt = only essential Australian Defence changes where absolutely necessary to EMAR Section A requirements. Will look and read extremely similar to EMAR. Adapt = tailor EMAR within the context of existing Australian Defence Aviation. * Delayed implementation of EMAR. Interim approach: to use national equivalency for maintenance licensing

Australian Implementation Schedule Jan 16 : Draft DASR released Community consultation (NPA/NPRM) Late 16 : New DASR promulgated Dec 18 : Existing Australian Defence Aviation Safety Regulations no longer supported Note: Regulated community converts from existing Technical Regulations to DASR from Jan 16

Example of future Australian Defence Aviation Safety Regulation (DASR) DASR modelled off EASA framework Implementing Regulations (IR) Basic Regulation Initial Airworthiness Continuing Airworthiness Air Crew Air Operations Air Navigation Systems (ANS) Rules of the Air (RoA) Aerodromes Aviation SMS Part 21 (Adopt from EMAR) Unmanned Aircraft System Part M Continuing Aw Requirements (Adopt from EMAR) Part 145 Requirements for Maintenance Organisations (Adopt from EMAR) Part 66 Military Aircraft Maintenance Licensing (Adapt from EMAR) FCL MED CC ARA ORA ARO ORO CAT NCC NCO SPO UAS Gen ATS Nav Aids Air Space MET AIS ABM TAC Gen RoA Gen ADR ARFF SAF SMS Regs Part 147 Aircraft Maintenance Training Organisations (Adapt from EMAR) FTE AWR Engineering Maint

EMAR/DASR smart user interface Regulations developed and published using Commercial Off The Shelf software - AuthorIT Regulatory Development and Publishing Tool in one One tool for entire framework Easy to use for both developers and users EMAR Version control can import from pdf/word docs Unique tracking of additions Access control multi concurrent access (internet hosted) Output display easily adjusted/changed/formatted, etc S1000D compliant International specification for the procurement and production of technical publications Demonstration of smart user interface [a demonstration will be conducted during the presentation]

EMAR implementation challenges non-eda member State Additional implementation challenges for non-eda member states Military non-familiarity with EASA framework Industry non-familiarity with EASA framework Lack of understanding of the rationale of EMAR development Militarisation of EASA Regulation, AMC and GM Training and Education Likely to be limited (if any) experience training providers within a non- EDA member state Training/education may have to outsource (from EU?) Australia contracted a training provider from EU Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) initially difficult to develop Australian SME development difficulties (slow ramp up) Cultural differences between non-european and European Nations Adoption of European requirements i.e. EMARS Is there a case here for International Military Airworthiness Requirements IMARS?

Conclusion EMAR is the emerging military global convention for military aviation safety regulation EMAR can be implemented by a non-eda member state Non-EDA member states face additional challenges Australian Defence culture is well positioned for EMAR Implementation Australia will implement EMAR based regulations (DASR) commencing 2016 More Information. Further EMAR/DASR information and Australian points of contacts can be found at: www.defence.gov.au/dgta/ [then select EMAR Implementation ]

EMAR implementation; a non-eda member states view Questions?