APPLICATION OF THE NO-SPECIAL-FEE SYSTEM IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA

Similar documents
Helsinki February 1986 HELCOM RECOMMENDATION 7/9 *)

SHIP-GENERATED WASTE MANAGEMENT


THE TARIFF OF PORT FEES AND CHARGES SZCZECIN AND ŚWINOUJŚCIE SEAPORTS AUTHORITY

FEES OF THE PORT OF PÄRNU

Harlingen Port Authority

HELCOM Ministerial Declaration on the implementation of the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan

Ship-generated Waste Management Plan of the Freeport of Riga

Commonwealth of Dominica. Office of the Maritime Administrator

GUIDELINES ON BUNKERING OPERATIONS AND SHIP TO SHIP CARGO TRANSFER OF OILS, SUBJECT TO ANNEX I OF MARPOL 73/78, IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA

Marine Protection Rules Part 141 Ship Design, Construction, Equipment and Operation Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk

Order on the discharge of oil from ships in the exclusive economic zone around Greenland

SUSTAINABLE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY TOURISM IN THE COASTAL ZONES OF THE BALTIC SEA AREA

IMO. RESOLUTION A.882(21) adopted on 25 November 1999 AMENDMENTS TO THE PROCEDURES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL (RESOLUTION A.787(19))

Cruise Industry Perspective on OWS and Waste Management

MARINE CIRCULAR MC-1/2013/1

IMO PROMOTION OF IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF MARPOL AND RELATED INSTRUMENTS. Comments on the proposal by WWF

LITTLEHAMPTON HARBOUR BOARD

Marine Protection Rules Part 101B: Surveys and Inspections Noxious Liquid Substances Carried in Bulk

Validity: indefinitely

Congratulations to the Wider Caribbean Region!!!

ANNEX 7. RESOLUTION MSC.343(91) (adopted on 30 November 2012)

AGREEMENT BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA FOR AIR SERVICES

b) Cargo ships, including high-speed craft, of 500 GT and above; and c) Mobile offshore units, including mobile offshore drilling units

Marpol Port facilities The case and regulation of Spain

REVISION TO THE PRE-ARRIVAL NOTIFICATION OF SECURITY (PANS)

Government Decree on Inspecting Foreign Ships in Finland (1241/2010)

GIBRALTAR PORT AUTHORITY. Gibraltar Port Authority Port Waste Management Plan for Ship Generated Waste

Order on the discharge of oil from ships 1

DEVELOPMENT OF A MANDATORY POLAR CODE UPDATE ON PROGRESS

MARINE CIRCULAR MC-3/2016/1

Technical. Policy Lead. Douglas

TARIFF OF HARBOUR DUES

MERCHANT SHIPPING (PREVENTION OF OIL POLLUTION) (RECORDS) REGULATIONS 1986

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

HARBOUR DUES. The Port of Helsingborg

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council


COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /2010

Recommendations on Consultation and Transparency

Finnish Maritime Administration BULLETIN 10/

MERCHANT SHIPPING (PREVENTION OF POLLUTION BY GARBAGE) REGULATIONS 2005 BR 48 / 2005 MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT : 35

ALL SHIPOWNERS, OPERATORS, MASTERS AND OFFICERS OF MERCHANT SHIPS, AND RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATIONS

TREATY SERIES 2007 Nº 73

DMA RO Circular no. 002

Clean Seas Guide. The Baltic Sea Area A MARPOL 73/78 Special Area

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR Belgium and Luxembourg

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTERNATIONAL POLAR CODE

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland N.B. Unofficial translation. Legally valid only in Finnish and Swedish

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS OF THE POLAR CODE

PORT CHARGES AND FEES

NOTICE N-1. Berthage and Anchorage Fees Tariff

Order for Greenland on the safe navigation, etc. of ships

RESOLUTION MSC.271(85) (adopted on 4 December 2008) ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL CODE OF SAFETY FOR HIGH-SPEED CRAFT, 2000 (2000 HSC

CROSS-BORDER TRADE IN SERVICES

PORT FEES AND CHARGES IN THE PORT OF LIEPAJA

Port dues and charges Free port of Ventspils

United Nations Environment Programme

Airworthiness Directive Policy PO.CAP

Incentive Discounts Programme for Traffic Development at Sofia Airport 2018

Ratification of Conventions

CONFERENCE ON THE ECONOMICS OF AIRPORTS AND AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES

ANNEX 2. RESOLUTION MSC.308(88) (adopted on 3 December 2010)

St. Mary s Harbour. Port Waste Management Plan

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

Agreement. between. the Federal Minister of Transport, Innovation and Technology of the Republic of Austria. and

9 June I:\CIRC\MSC\01\1305.doc INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR

Abruzzo Airport. Commercial Policy Development Routes

Maritime Passenger Rights

Provisional Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Korea and the Government of the People's Republic of China for Civil Air Transport

MINISTRY OF MARITIME AFFAIRS, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Authorization Matrix / Date: 12/06/2017 Revision: 7

LIST OF NEW IMO/ILO OBLIGATORY REQUIREMENTS entering into force in 2014

Best Practice Guidance for the handling of waste water in ports

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

EU GPP CRITERIA FOR INDOOR CLEANING SERVICES 1. INTRODUCTION

ICS Shipping Conference. (including MLC) 11 September 2013

Port Dues and Charges of the Freeport of Riga

National Standard for Tonnage Measurement and Calculation on Myanmar Waters General Definitions 2.

Captain J. Ashley Roach, JAGC, USN (retired)

The registration of foreign owned vessel under the Nigerian Cabotage Act 2003

IMO CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE

Mainz. Mannheim DEDICATED WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR RIVER NAVIGATION: THE SEAPORT INTERFACE WITH MARITIME NAVIGATION

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

ANNEX MARSEC FORM 02. ADOMS Department of Marine Services and Merchant Shipping Antigua and Barbuda MARITIME SECURITY

PANAMA MARITIME AUTHORITY MERCHANT MARINE CIRCULAR MMC-123

1994 HSC Code HSC Code

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /

Marine Protection Rules Part 190 Mandatory Ships Routeing

Revision of the Third Air Package

ACI EUROPE POSITION. A level playing field for European airports the need for revised guidelines on State Aid

SHIP ACCIDENTS IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA

(Note: This Declaration must be attached to the ship s Maritime Labour Certificate)

RESOLUTION MSC.234(82) RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING TONNAGE MEASUREMENT OF OPEN-TOP CONTAINERSHIPS

SCHEDULE OF PORT CHARGES

National Standard for Tonnage Measurement and Calculation of the Vessels Engaged on International Voyages General Definitions 2.

ARMATS ARMENIAN AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION

(i) When the passenger has booked a ticket in advance when the Carrier provides a confirmation of the booking.

Transcription:

CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT OF THE BALTIC SEA AREA HELSINKI COMMISSION - Baltic Marine HELCOM 19/98 Environment Protection Commission 15/1 Annex 19 19th Meeting Helsinki, 23-27 March 1998 HELCOM RECOMMENDATION 19/8 Adopted 26 March 1998 having regard to Article 13, Paragraph b) of the Helsinki Convention APPLICATION OF THE NO-SPECIAL-FEE SYSTEM IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA THE COMMISSION, RECALLING Article 8 of the 1992 Helsinki Convention which calls for development and application of uniform requirements for the provision on reception facilities, RECALLING ALSO Article 9 of the 1992 Helsinki Convention stipulating a need for special measures in relation to pleasure craft, which include the establishment of adequate reception facilities for wastes from pleasure craft, RECALLING FURTHER the Baltic Strategy for Port Reception Facilities for Ship-generated Wastes and Associated Issues and HELCOM Recommendation 17/11 on reception facilities, which state that, as a matter of priority, a harmonized fee system shall be established with the dual purpose of encouraging ships to deliver waste ashore and to avoid undesirable waste streams between ports, thereby encouraging a sound sharing of the waste burden, CONSCIOUS that the no-special-fee system constitutes such a system and that it is one of the prerequisites for a substantial decrease in the number of operational and illegal discharges and thus for the prevention of pollution from ships to the marine environment in the Baltic Sea Area, NOTING that the port authorities are responsible for providing reception facilities for wastes covered by Annex I (oily wastes from machinery spaces of ships), Annex IV (sewage) and Annex V (garbage) of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78), NOTING ALSO that the consignor in the loading port is responsible for reception arrangements for cargo related wastes covered by Annex I of MARPOL 73/78, NOTING FURTHER that the consignee in the unloading port is responsible for reception arrangements for wastes covered by Annex II (noxious liquid substances) of MARPOL 73/78, BEARING IN MIND that the Baltic Strategy for Port Reception Facilities for Ship-generated Wastes and Associated Issues aims at the application of a harmonized fee system for reception of wastes covered by Annexes I, IV and V of MARPOL 73/78, 130

RECOGNIZING that in the beginning the harmonized no-special-fee system covers only oily wastes from machinery spaces of ships, BEING AWARE that in order to avoid distortion of competition between ports, a similar system is needed also in the North Sea Region, BEING AWARE ALSO of the endeavours within the European Union to make a Directive on port reception facilities for ship-generated wastes, RECOMMENDS that the attached Guidelines for the establishment of a harmonized no-special-fee system shall be applied for the operation of reception facilities in the ports of the Contracting Parties as of 1 January 2000, REQUESTS the Maritime Committee to develop guidelines for the harmonized no-special-fee system covering Annexes IV and V of MARPOL 73/78 for adoption by HELCOM 22, REQUESTS ALSO the Governments of the Contracting Parties to support or seek active co-operation with the North Sea States for the purpose of establishing the no-special-fee system also in the North Sea Region, REQUESTS FURTHER the Governments of those Contracting Parties being Member States of the European Union to strive for corresponding regulations as part of a European Council directive on port reception facilities for waste and residues from ships, REQUESTS FURTHERMORE the Governments of the Contracting Parties to report on the implementation of the Guidelines in accordance with the reporting format on the implementation of the Baltic Strategy for Port Reception Facilities for Ship-generated Wastes and Associated Issues. 131

HELCOM Recommendation 19/8 ATTACHMENT Guidelines for the establishment of a no-special-fee system for the discharge of ship-generated oily wastes originating from machinery spaces to port reception facilities 1 Definition of the no-special-fee system 1.1 In this context the no-special-fee system is defined as a charging system where the cost of reception, handling and disposal of ship-generated wastes, originating from the normal operation of the ship, is included in the harbour fee or otherwise charged to the ship irrespective of whether wastes are delivered or not. 1.2 The no-special-fee system is not restricted to any specific type of waste. 2 Obligation to pay Every sea-going ship's obligation to pay for reception, handling and disposal of oil residues is deemed to arise with the arrival of a ship in any port of the participating countries, irrespective of whether or not that particular ship will actually make use of the reception facilities which are available there. The above fee covers the waste collecting, handling and processing including infrastructure and shall be distributed among vessels and collected as part of or in addition to the port dues. 3 Exemptions 3.1 A ship shall be exempted by the competent authority from the obligation to pay, when engaged in dedicated trade, such as ferry or liner services including feeder services, and it is ensured that the disposal requirements will be met on the ship s own account, i.e. the ship has made an agreement with a competent waste management company on the discharge of ship s wastes to reception facilities, and on the transfer of the wastes for final treatment and disposal, or 3.2 when stationed in the area of the same port (e.g. tugs and other assistance services and laid-up ships) and it is ensured that the disposal requirements will be met on the ship s own account. 3.3 For the purpose of these Guidelines dedicated trade means ship s voyages in the Baltic and North Sea Areas between specified ports along the ship s route. 4 Basis of calculation of the no-special-fee 4.1 The waste management fee imposed on a ship should be independent of the volume of the wastes discharged into port reception facilities. To obtain the maximum of truth and fairness in specifying the ships' contribution to the no-special-fee system the gross tonnage, as indicated in the vessel's Data Sheet, should be taken as the basis of calculation by the port. 132

4.2 A high quality standard of the applied waste management procedures and waste processing equipment on board can also be taken into account in scaling the waste management fee, having in mind the general aim of minimization of waste production, and the benefit of waste separation. 4.3 The waste management fee shall be transparent to all ships, i.e. the size of the waste management fee shall be visible to every ship even if it is included in the harbour fee. 4.4 The waste management fees received from ships shall be used for no other purposes than: - investments in reception facilities, stationary and mobile; - operation of reception facilities; - repair and maintenance costs of such facilities; - costs of handling, treatment and final disposal of the received wastes. 5 Right to claim disposal 5.1 Every ship obliged to pay a waste management fee has the right to claim discharge of her oily wastes from machinery spaces to port reception facilities on the conditions stated above without having to pay any extra amount therefore. Any services beyond such right to claim disposal shall be paid for separately. 6 Reception facilities 6.1 Reception facilities shall be provided in ports, adequate to meet the needs of the ships without causing undue delay. 6.2 The Port Operator/Port Authority shall at request provide the ship with a receipt stating the amount and type of the discharged oily waste. 6.3 The Port Operator/Port Authority shall provide the ship with a document informing of inadequacy of a reception facility. 7 Administrative aspects of disposal operations 7.1 Ships should make a notification to the next port of call twenty-four hours before the time of intended discharge indicating the volume and composition of the oily residues they wish to dispose of. 7.2 To ensure the orderly disposal of oily wastes from machinery spaces, every vessel in a port may be subject to on-board inspection. Such on-board inspection may cover Oil Record Books and receipts from a reception facility operator indicating time, place and quantity of the transfer and may comprise the sounding of ullage in tanks assigned for wastes and the request for documentary evidence to be supplied of available tank capacities. Receipts should be kept onboard for the time of validity of the Oil Record Book. 133

8 Waste delivery data 8.1 Data should be gathered from the waste discharge operations of a ship in the port for the purpose of statistics and possible data exchange among the port authorities of the ship's current, preceding, and next port of call. 9 Avoidance of competitive distortion 9.1 To avoid competitive distortions between ports located in different sea areas, all possible efforts shall be made to achieve as soon as possible a harmonized waste management fee system for the ports in the Baltic Sea and in the North Sea Regions. 9.2 The states involved shall make the necessary efforts in order to implement a harmonized fee system simultaneously in the ports of the Baltic as well as in the North Sea Regions. 9.3 Provisions should be made to preclude any subsidizing of the waste-management fee through public funds for the operation of reception facilities. 9.4 The Governments of the Contracting Parties shall exchange periodic reports on the implementation of these Guidelines in their ports, including reports on the financing and operation of reception facilities, and evaluate such reports at the meetings of the Maritime Committee of the Helsinki Commission. 134