Hans Otto Kristensen. Consulting Naval Architect Phone: Mail: Evaluation of CO 2 emissions from cruise ships

Similar documents
Environmental Performance Evaluation of Ro-Ro Passenger Ferry Transportation

Analysis of technical data of Ro-Ro ships

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION HALF YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT JANUARY-JUNE July 2017 Jaakko Eskola, President & CEO. Wärtsilä PUBLIC

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION INTERIM REPORT JANUARY-MARCH April 2017 Jaakko Eskola, President & CEO. Wärtsilä PUBLIC

Benefits Assessment for Tailored Arrivals

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION RESULT PRESENTATION January 2018 Jaakko Eskola, President & CEO. Wärtsilä PUBLIC

New Method for Environmental Performance Evaluation of Ro-Ro Passenger Ships

August Briefing. Why airport expansion is bad for regional economies

MARPOL Consolidated Edition 2017

OPERATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF CRUISE SPEED REDUCTIONS FOR NEXT GENERATION FUEL EFFICIENT SUBSONIC AIRCRAFT

BHP Billiton Scope 3 emissions

Emerging Technologies Program. Supplement to Application Assessment Report # Hotel Bathroom Lighting Controls San Francisco, CA

Fuel Burn Impacts of Taxi-out Delay and their Implications for Gate-hold Benefits

GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE (GIACC)

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION HALF YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT July 2018 Jaakko Eskola, President & CEO. Wärtsilä PUBLIC

OPTIMAL PUSHBACK TIME WITH EXISTING UNCERTAINTIES AT BUSY AIRPORT

Performance Evaluation of Individual Aircraft Based Advisory Concept for Surface Management

AIS ship movements analysis for CBSS, Riga, 19 Sept 2012 Torbjörn Rydbergh, M.Sc., Nav. Arch. Managing Director & Owner

MARITIM INNOVASJON FOR FREMTIDENS REDERI

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION INTERIM REPORT JANUARY-MARCH April 2018 Jaakko Eskola, President & CEO. Wärtsilä PUBLIC

INTERIM REPORT JANUARY-JUNE 2012 BJÖRN ROSENGREN, PRESIDENT & CEO 18 JULY 2012

Messe Frankfurt events generate annual revenues of 3.6 billion euros

SLOW STEAMING A transientt fashion or here to stay?

How a global corporation can benefit from the international equivalence of national measurement standards

Estimating Domestic U.S. Airline Cost of Delay based on European Model

Carbon Offset Schemes for Aviation: Inconsistent supply and weak

Aviation Insights No. 8

Assignment 2: Route Profitability Evalua8on Michael D. Wi?man

FLEET DEVELOPMENT PLANNING OF AIRLINES: INCORPORATING THE AIRCRAFT OPERATING ECONOMICS FACTOR O.

THEORY OF CHANGE. Kigali, Rwanda 10 March 2014

Measure 67: Intermodality for people First page:

Quantile Regression Based Estimation of Statistical Contingency Fuel. Lei Kang, Mark Hansen June 29, 2017

Developing an Aircraft Weight Database for AEDT

Forecast and Overview

SEA SHIPPING EMISSIONS 2012: NETHERLANDS CONTINENTAL SHELF, 12-MILE ZONE, PORT AREAS AND OSPAR REGION II

180.8 million passengers, nearly 17.7 million cars and 3.3 million cargo units. Every year 6.4 million passengers travel on Viking Line s vessels.

VIEWPOINT JANUARY Japan Hotel Market Outlook

Effect of ship structure and size on grounding and collision damage distributions

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION INTERIM REPORT JANUARY-SEPTEMBER October 2018 Jaakko Eskola, President & CEO. Wärtsilä PUBLIC

SFO Tailored Arrivals Environmental Analysis

The European Experience Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Fuel Conservation Reserve Fuel Optimization

SCRUBBERS FOR THE BALTIC SEA AREA SHIPS FUEL AND TECHNOLOGY TOOLBOX SEMINAR

CARBON EMISSIONS FROM INTERNATIONAL CRUISE SHIP PASSENGERS TRAVEL TO AND FROM NEW ZEALAND

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION INTERIM REPORT JANUARY-SEPTEMBER October 2016 Jaakko Eskola, President & CEO. Wärtsilä PUBLIC

TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP OF MARINE PROPULSION ENGINES

IMPACT OF EU-ETS ON EUROPEAN AIRCRAFT OPERATORS

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION JP MORGAN CAZENOVE EUROPEAN CAPITAL GOODS CEO CONFERENCE

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION

Efficient Propulsion for Seagoing Vessels

3. ICAO Supporting Tools - Publicly available

ICAO Environmental Tools. Ted Thrasher Environment Branch, Environmental Modelling Unit ICAO Air Transport Bureau

Evaluation of Alternative Aircraft Types Dr. Peter Belobaba

Operational data from shipping in the Geirangerfjord, Nærøyfjord og Aurlandsfjord. Data collection from cruise ships and local traffic

AIRLINES MAINTENANCE COST ANALYSIS USING SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODELING

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION INTERIM REPORT JANUARY-SEPTEMBER October 2017 Jaakko Eskola, President & CEO. Wärtsilä PUBLIC

Annual General Meeting. 13 June 2017

Corporate Productivity Case Study

DATA APPLICATION CATEGORY 25 FARE BY RULE

Propulsion Trends in Container Vessels

Simulation of disturbances and modelling of expected train passenger delays

Decisions on which type of approach to use vary with each airline, and sometimes even for each flight. aero quarterly qtr_02 10

Restructuring of advanced instruction and training programs in order to increase the number of flight hours for military pilots.

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail

WÄRTSILÄ EXHAUST GAS CLEANING. 28 October 2013 WÄRTSILÄ ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS PRODUCTS / MORTEN LETNES

15:00 minutes of the scheduled arrival time. As a leader in aviation and air travel data insights, we are uniquely positioned to provide an

Small Group Exercise 1: Emissions Monitoring Plan

October 2013 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Homeport 2.0 User Guide for Public Users

CLEANSHIP. Clean Baltic Sea Shipping. 3.1 Air pollution from ships in the partner ports

November 2013 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

HK GAAP RESULTS RELEASE 25 February 2008 STAR CRUISES GROUP ANNOUNCES FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL YEAR RESULTS FOR 2007

Estonia. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Aviation EU ETS: implementation, case study and way forward

INTERIM REPORT JANUARY-JUNE 2013

Transport Expert Panel. Summary Report Krakow,

Environmental benefits of continuous descent approaches at Schiphol Airport compared with conventional approach procedures

P.001.FPG FUEL PLANNING GUIDE. First Edition

Shanghai Green Port Construction. Shanghai Municipal Transportation Commission

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Bunker World Conference May 5, 2010

Green House Gases Footprint: Cruise vers Car

Tuesday 6 June 2017 Afternoon Time allowed: 2 hours

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail

Multiple comparison of green express aviation network path optimization research

Technical Documentation Wind Turbine Generator Systems with LNTE 50 Hz and 60 Hz

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION RESULT PRESENTATION JANUARY Björn Rosengren, President & CEO. Wärtsilä

Falcon 2000S & Challenger 350 Analysis

Large Airtanker Scenario (Scenario 1: Regional Fire)

Airline Operating Costs Dr. Peter Belobaba

Net sales by business area in % Services. Ship Power 31% Power Plants POWER PLANTS

THE IMPACT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE AND AIRCRAFT TYPE SELECTION ON INDONESIA AIRLINES BUSINESS SUSTAINABILITY

PART II. Authors: Agnes DeFranco, Ed.D., CHAE Arlene Ramirez, CHE, CHAE Tanya Venegas, MBA, MHM, CHIA

The results of CAIMANs project Future emission scenarios

July 2012 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Concur Travel: Post Ticket Change Using Sabre Automated Exchanges

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION

U.S. Coast Guard - American Waterways Operators Annual Safety Report

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: THE CASE OF DURRES PORT ABSTRACT

Transcription:

Evaluation of CO 2 emissions from cruise ships November 218 1

Reported oil consumption per 24 hours (t/24 h) Introduction The main purpose of this short report is to present results of an evaluation of specific CO 2 emissions, i.e. emissions per passenger per travelled km for cruise ships. The CO 2 emissions are based on real oil consumption data per 24 hours reported by cruise ship operators to the company ShipPax which publish annual statistical reports for the cruise and ferry industry. ShipPax Information (https://www.shippax.com/) also collects their data in an electronic database, which accessible through a subscription service. ShipPax data A full up to date extract of oil consumption data from the ShipPax data base is shown in fig. 1 and 2 showing total oil consumption data per 24 hours for 156 ships, built in the period from 196 to 218. 3 25 Cruise ship data for 156 ships (196-218) Source: ShipPax Information 15 1 5 196 197 198 199 21 22 Building year Fig. 1 Fuel oil consumption per 24 hours as function of building year for cruise ships 2

Reported oil consumption per 24 hours (t/24 h) 3 25 15 1 5 Cruise ship data for 156 ships (196-218) Source: ShipPax database 1 3 4 5 6 7 Maximum number of passengers Fig. 2 Fuel oil consumption per 24 hours as function of maximum number of passengers for cruise ships Verification of oil consumption data The ShipPax data base also contains data of the total main engine power and the associated total auxiliary power including the service speed. Using these data and assuming a specific fuel oil consumption of 18 g/kwh and g/kwh for the main engines and the auxiliary engines respectively, the oil consumption per 24 hours has been calculated assuming, that the service speed is obtained at a service main engine rating of 75 % MCR (maximum continuous service rating) and using 1/3 of the installed auxiliary engine power. Fig. 3 shows a comparison between the calculated oil consumption and the reported oil consumption, where it is seen, that the reported oil consumptions seem reasonable verifiable, with a slight tendency of larger actual consumption. 3

Reported oil consumption per 24 hours 35 3 25 15 1 5 Cruise ship data for 156 ships (196-218) Source: ShipPax database 5 1 15 25 3 35 Calculated oil consumption per 24 hours Fig. 3 Comparison between calculated and reported fuel oil consumption for cruise ships Calculation of CO 2 emission per passenger per km Assuming that the CO 2 emissions per ton oil is 3.15 ton, the CO 2 emissions have been calculated per passenger per km as both the number of passengers and the speed is reported in the ShipPax data base. The consumption reported by the cruise ship operators has been used in these calculations, which means that they are carried out without any kind of assumptions concerning engine loading and specific fuel oil consumption. The results of the calculations are shown in fig. 4. The only assumption is 1 % utilization, which is too optimistic, as the cruise ships in general are not always fully occupied with passengers, although the utilization is relative large for this passenger ship segment. If the ships are sailing at a lower speed, the oil consumption will be reduced as example by 25 % at 1 % speed reduction. The 1 % 4

CO2 emissions per pass. per km (g/pass./km) utilization assumption might therefore very roughly compensate for a possible lower service speed compared to the speed given in the ShipPax database. 14 1 Cruise ships - built 196-218 CO 2 emission for 156 cruise ships according to ShipPax database assuming 1 % capacity utilization 1 Copyright: ShipPax (Halmstad, Sweden) and HOK Marineconsult ApS (hokmarine@mail.dk) 8 6 CO 2 per pass. per km (g/pass/km) = 2112 x PAX -.29 4 156 cruise ships Potens (156 cruise ships) 1 3 4 5 6 7 Maximum number of passengers (PAX) Fig. 4 Calculated CO 2 emissions per passenger per km Acknowledgement The author wants to thank ShipPax information for the permission to use data from the company s extensive ship data base. 5