II. Terminology and Basic

Similar documents
Public Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

These elements are designed to make service more convenient, connected, and memorable.

Juneau Comprehensive Operations Analysis and Transit Development Plan DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS January 2014

Region of Waterloo Transportation and Environmental Services Transit Services

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

ROUTE 110. St. Albans Downtown Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018

Miami Orlando Passenger Rail Project Overview

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

General Issues Committee Item Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy

Caroline County / King George County Transit Studies. Meeting November 1, 2017

CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN 1

Alternatives: Strategies for Transit Systems Change

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

3. Proposed Midwest Regional Rail System

Swedish Service Routes, American Style: Local Bus for the Suburbs 70TH ANNUAL OHIO TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE OCTOBER 25, 2016

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

ROUTE 103. Morrisville Shopping Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

Business Intelligence Development at Winnipeg Transit

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

GCTD Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) 10:00 a.m. - Wednesday, July 18, 2018 Gold Coast Transit District - Board Room.

Bristol Virginia Transit

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

PORTS TORONTO Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Summary of 2015 Traffic and Passenger Surveys

(This page intentionally left blank.)

2018 Service Changes Ada County

HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING

Figure 1: Route 56B Hazelwood

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

ROUTE EBA EAST BUSWAY ALL STOPS ROUTE EBS EAST BUSWAY SHORT

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

CENTRAL OREGON REGIONAL TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

PLEASE READ Proposal for Sustainable Service

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

1 Introduction 2 2 Acknowledgements 2 3 Differences between Green Star SA rating tools 2 4 About the Calculator 2 5 How to Use the Calculator 2

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

Chapel Hill Transit: Short Range Transit Plan. Preferred Alternative DRAFT

SERVICE GUIDELINES Revised April 2015

Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Silver Line Operating Plan

CobbLinc Forward Service Package

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs CTAA Expo June 2014

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

PTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

METROPOLITAN EVANSVILLE TRANSIT SYSTEM Part I: Comprehensive Operations Analysis Overview July 9 th, 2015 Public Information Meeting

Summary of Proposed NH 120 Service

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN

CCTA Peer Analysis. June 2014

DAILY TRIPS (LOOP) Monday-Friday 6:55 AM to 6:20 PM 60/60/ 11 Saturday 7:55 AM to 5:55 PM 60/ 10 Sunday

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

COMMUTING MASS TRANSPORT CALCULATOR GUIDE Version 1.0

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Chapter 4. Ridecheck and Passenger Survey

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

2.0 Miami-Dade Transit System Overview

CHAPTER 5: Operations Plan

Service Performance 2013 Networked Family of Services

Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0. Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Why to Introduce Flat Fare System in Janmarg, Ahmedabad, Gujarat A Case Study

Service Performance 2010 Networked Family of Services

Analysis of Transit Fare Evasion in the Rose Quarter

Miami Orlando Passenger Rail Project Overview

Title VI Service Monitoring Program

WATERBORNE TRANSIT. April 21, 2010

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Big10 Performance Analysis

Bus Corridor Service Options

SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT + SAN LUIS OBISPO RTA JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS: SERVICE STRATEGIES. Presented by: Gordon Shaw, PE, AICP; Principal

Prior to reviewing the various performances of Red Apple Transit, it is important to point out some key terminology, including:

Corridor Analysis. Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead

The Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience. June 6 th, 2017 RTD s Pass Program Working Group 2 nd Meeting

MEMORANDUM. for HOV Monitoring on I-93 North and the Southeast Expressway, Boston Region MPO, November, 2011.

Wake Bus Plan. Short Range Transit Plans. Proposed Transit Service Projects and Changes. GoCary. Volume 3 DRAFT

VCTC Intercity Five-Year Service Plan

Transit Vehicle Scheduling: Problem Description

FIRST WEEK UPDATE: 66 EXPRESS LANES INSIDE THE BELTWAY Data from first four days shows faster, more reliable trips on I-66

COMO Bus Service Evaluation DRAFT COA. September 19, 2016

Metro Green Line to LAX. January, 2012

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

FIRST WEEK UPDATE: 66 EXPRESS LANES INSIDE THE BELTWAY Data from first four days shows faster, more reliable trips on I-66

Table E1 Summary of Annual Revenue Service Hours. System LTC Routes 581, , , , ,082 (Quick Start)

NORTHERN NAPA VALLEY TRANSIT STUDY

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry

Kingston Transportation Master Plan Draft Report Transit Forecasting 1

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results

Transcription:

II. Terminology and Basic Relationships Public Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction II-1

Planning and Analysis Building Blocks Schedule Building Cost Analysis and Financial Planning Performance Analysis Measures & Standards Network and Route Design Market Factors and Demand Analysis Service Monitoring and Data Collection Fares and Revenue: Policy, Analysis, and Collection Terminology and Basic Relationships Focus of Discussion II-2 II-2

Basic Public Transport Terms Service Output t Route Alignment Terminal (Route) Garage (Parking and Maintenance) Span of Service Interval (Frequency) Time Running Terminal Cycle Bus Requirements Ridership Commercial Hours/KM Dead Hours/KM Vehicle Hours/KM Vehicle Capacity Passengers at Maximum Load Point II-3

Comments on Terminology Public transport systems sometimes use different terms to define the same operating concepts This presentation uses common terminology found in many countries II-4

Route Alignment Path Over Which the Bus Travels Balance between coverage and directness Maybe different alignments based on time of day Some systems give new route name to each separate alignment and/or direction Megabus Pereira II-5

Terminal The end of a route May be shared by several routes May also be served by different modes Intercity bus or feeder Bus stations often provided at major terminals Megabus Station BMTC KSB Station II-6

Garage (Parking and Maintenance) Operating facility Functions (more added d as number of buses increases) Parking Daily, routine servicing Vehicle repair Driver assignment BMTC II-7

Span of Service Start End 5 am 11pm Total Clock Hours Over Which Public Transport Service is Operated Common spans of service Work days All day (covers both peak commuting periods) AM, PM peak commuting hours only Owl (early morning) service Saturday service Sunday (Friday) and holiday service II-8

Interval (Frequency) Time in Minutes Between Two Arrivals (or Departures) of Buses or Trains e.g., At an interval of 10 minutes, a bus or train departs every 10 minutes Interval is the inverse measure of service frequency (60/interval) = Buses/Hour Interval II-9

Running Time Travel Time From One Terminal to the Other Terminal e.g., The running time for a bus that leaves Terminal A at 7:00 AM and arrives at Terminal B at 7:50 AM is 50 minutes A Running times often vary by direction and time of day, so monitoring is important: Efficient scheduling of vehicles Good passenger information B II-10

Terminal Time Time scheduled for a respective vehicle between when it arrives at a terminal and when it departs for its next trip e.g., A bus arrives at Terminal B at 7:50 AM and departs on its next trip at 8:00 AM. The terminal time is 10 minutes Reasons for terminal time Time to get back on schedule if the trip arrives late at terminal A rest break for the driver Often 12-18% of running time Requires space at terminal for parking the bus II-11

Cycle Time Total Time Required for a Vehicle to Make a Complete Round Trip on a Route Cycle Time = Round Trip Running Time + Terminal Time e.g., One-Way Running Time = 50 minutes each direction Terminal Time = 10 minutes at each terminal Cycle Time = (50 minutes X 2) + (10 minutes X 2) = 120 Minutes II-12

Bus Requirements Number of buses (vehicles) required to operate a transport route for a given interval Buses in service = Cycle time/interval eg e.g., Cycle time = 120 minutes Interval = 10 minutes Buses requirements = 120/10 = 12 The number must be an integer (whole number) II-13

The Planner s Dilemma: Required Number of Buses Is Not An Integer Problem Cycle Time = 72; Interval = 11 Buses in Service = 72/11 = 6.5 Solution 1: Add additional terminal time Buses in Service = (72 + 5)/11 = 7 Solution 2: Reduce interval Buses in Service = (72)/9 =8 Solution 3: Stretch interval Buses in Service = (72)/12 = 6 II-14

Ridership Number of Passengers Boarding Passengers Bogotá tá Casablanca Counted each time a passenger boards a vehicle Most common measure of ridership Person (Origin-Destination) Trips BMTC Counted once for each origin-to-destination i ti ti journey, irrespective of transfers Smaller number than boarding gpassengers II-15

Boarding Passengers and Person Trips Route 5 One passenger travels from home to work Boards Route 5, transfers to Route 33, and gets off at work Boarding passengers = 2 Route 33 Person trips = 1 II-16

Commercial Hours and Kilometers Hours and Kilometers Operated When Transport Vehicles Available to Public Includes: Running time Terminal time Sometimes called effective hours or kilometers II-17

Dead Hours and Kilometers Hours and Kilometers Traveled By Transport Vehicle When Not In Revenue Service Includes hours (KM) that t a vehicle travels between either The garage and route or Two routes when the vehicle changes routes II-18

Vehicle Hours and Kilometers Hours and Kilometers Traveled From Pull- Out from Garage to Pull-In Includes Commercial time Dead time Does not include other KM/hours such as training II-19

Capacity Maximum number of passengers that can be carried on a vehicle = number of seats + the number of permitted standing Bangalore passengers e.g., Number of Seats on the Bus = 48 Number of Permitted Standing Passengers = 112 Capacity of the Bus = 48 + 112 = 160 Passengers BMTC II-20

Reasons Vehicle Capacities Vary Among Public Transport Operators Number of doors Affect loading/unloading times and seating space Low-floor buses Less interior space, faster loading/unloading times Space allocation for seats and standing areas Tradeoff between carrying capacity (operations efficiency) and quality of service provided to riders More seats provided when standing times are long Policies regarding standing passengers/meter 2 Tradeoff between carrying capacity (operations efficiency) and quality of service provided to riders Reflect local norms regarding comfortable personal space II-21

Passengers at the Maximum Load Point BMTC Number of Passengers On-Board a Transit Vehicle as It Passes the Location on the Route with the Maximum Passengers On- Board Typically on the edge of downtown for routes serving the center city Used for scheduling vehicles to meet occupancy (load) factor standards d or maximum allowed capacity II-22

Passenger Demand Profile for Radial Route Pass sengers Onb board Leavi ing Stop 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Electronic City Kudlu Gate Madiwala Maharanis College City Market Stops II-23

Summary Defined 15 key public transport terms Using common public transport terms makes it easier to: Communicate with transport professionals, Learn from other transport systems, and Compare performance results II-24