Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

Similar documents
Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #FarePolicy

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

MAKING PERFORMANCE MEASURES MATTER

Sound Transit Operations January 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT

Board of Directors Information Summary

Sound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations February 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Presentation to Board of Directors on All-Door Boarding System-wide Implementation

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

2010 MTA Financial Plan & Proposed LIRR Service Reductions Supplemental Information. MTA Long Island Rail Road

Bristol Virginia Transit

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

EXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION

Performance Measurement:

Sound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

CHERRIOTS 2018 SERVICE PLAN 1

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

Sound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

The 15-day comment period will run from Thursday, April 4, 2019 to 4pm on Wednesday April 18, 2019.

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

MERRIMACK VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MVRTA) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Bus Operations Report

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY INTERDIVISIONAL TARIFF NO. 132 SUPPLEMENT NO. 29 LOCAL RATES OF FARE AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING

YRT/VIVA PROPOSED FARE INCREASE

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

Report by Finance Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Approval of August 2019 Service Changes

Objectives for Setting Transfer Time Windows and Other Considerations for Transit Fare Policy

Orange County Transportation Authority Fare Integration Project A Regional Approach

1. Introduction. 2. Overview of Existing Conditions

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

EX28.6 REPORT FOR ACTION. Advancing Fare Integration SUMMARY. Date: October 16, 2017 To: Executive Committee From: City Manager Wards: All

Welcome. Sign in Pick up comment form Visit stations to learn more Submit your comment form

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

Horizon 1 Implementation Update

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

ATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter

TRANSIT WINDSOR REPORT

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA)

Presentation Outline

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

Why does 2010 feel like the dark ages for fare collection? Fred Combs Lextran, Planning and Technology Manager Lexington, Kentucky

Transit Commission. Tax Supported Programs

Prior to reviewing the various performances of Red Apple Transit, it is important to point out some key terminology, including:

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

Memorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program

Executive Summary. Introduction. Community Assessment

The Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience. June 6 th, 2017 RTD s Pass Program Working Group 2 nd Meeting

Fare Changes Package

Title VI Analysis for Route Based Fares

Draft SamTrans Service Plan Public Outreach Presentation

NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY MTA BUS COMPANY

Proposed variation to fare policies in the Regional Public Transport Plan 2014 (variation 3) Supporting documentation and statement of proposal

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary's Office

SKAGIT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ferry Operations Division Ferry Fare Revenue Target Report

STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY

Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report. 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report

Transport. Passenger REACH TARGET ACCESS. Advertising Media Kit

Administrative Operations Report

Mobile and Online Ticketing Update. July 8, 2016 Board of Directors Meeting

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

LODI CITY COUNCIL Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi

POLICY PAPER. A Tale of Three Transit Cities: Overview

Base Adult Single Fares Current Fare Increase $ $5.69 $0.00 $ $6.50 $0.40 $ $8.25 $0.50 > $8.25 $0.60

ADA PARATRANSIT PLAN. Twin Cities Area Transportation Authority 275 East Wall Benton Harbor, MI 49022

Transcription:

Fiscal Management and Control Board Fare Policy October 16, 2015 1

Components of Fares Fare Level Different types of pricing by: By mode By time of day By distance By rider type (reduced fare) Subscription vs pay per ride Operations How and where people purchase and validate their fare: Before boarding vehicle While boarding vehicle After boarding vehicle Technology How we collect fares: Fare media (cash, ticket, smartcard, mobile) Hardware (faregates, fareboxes, readers, etc) Software (back office, account based, real-time capacities) Enforcement Different methods/responsibilities: Gated areas Frontline employees Proof of payment with inspection MBTA Police 2

Legislation around Fares Section MGL 161A(5)(d) 161A(5)(e) MBTA Requirement Public hearings for fare increases of 10% or more 50% discounts for: those ages 5-11, 65+ and disabled MA residents 161A(5)(q) Maximize fare revenue through reasonable and equitable fares, ridership growth & TOD 161A(11) Achieve a Net Operating Investment Per Passenger Mile (NOIPPM) of $0.20 or better. 272 (98a) Not charging blind or deaf people and for seeing-eye dogs. Session Laws 2013, Ch 46(4) Increase Fare Recovery Ratio by at least 10% annually 2013, Ch 46(61)(d) Not raise fares more than every 24-months, or at an annual rate greater than 5%. Operating budget to include sufficient revenue from fees and fares to meet benchmarks 2013, Ch 46(61)(d) established in the statute (for FY17) 2013, Ch 46(61)(d) Contribute at least 32.75% of operating revenue from fares/fees Federal Regulations FTA circular 4202.1A Not directly or inadvertently cause a disparate impact or disproportionate burden on any protected group or individual Equity analysis for any fare increase or decrease in any amount 3

Legislation around Fare Policy 161A(5)(r) To adopt, and revise as appropriate, a fare policy which addresses fare levels, including discounts, fare equity and a fare structure, including, but limited to, fare media and passes. Said fare policy shall include a system for free or substantially price-reduced transfer privileges. 4

Current Fares Base Fare (Cash/ Ticket) Local Bus Rapid Transit Commuter Rail $2.10 $2.65 11 Zones (Z1A, 1-10) CharlieCard $1.60 $2.10 Fare: $2.10-11.50 Monthly Pass $50 $75 $75-$362 184 Discrete Fare Products Services: Local bus, express bus (inner/outer), rapid transit, commuter rail (zones and interzones), ferry (4 services), theride Payment media: Cash, CharlieCard, CharlieTicket, Mobile, Ticket Time: Passes (month, 7 day, 1 day), stored value, 10 ride Who: Reduced fares for seniors, people with disabilities, students 5

History of Fare Increases Single-Ride Fares Over Time MBTA Fare Revenue by Mode $2.50 Rapid Transit (Heavy & Light Rail) Commuter Rail Surface Transit (Bus and Trolley) School, Senior & Paratransit (RIDE) $2.00 +18% +5% Ferry Boat $700,000,000 $1.50 +36% +20% +7% $600,000,000 $500,000,000 $1.00 +25% +39% $400,000,000 +20% $300,000,000 $0.50 $200,000,000 $0.00 $100,000,000 Bus Single-Ride Fare Subway / Rapid Transit Single-Ride Fare $0 6

Passes and Mode Differential Should we encourage pay per ride or subscription/pass usage? What multiple for passes? What differential between bus and rapid/bus for the core MBTA system? Agency Base Fare Subway One trip Bus Cost of Bus + Subway Pass Multiple 28.3 (base fare) MBTA $2.65 $2.10 $75 35.7 (CC fare) $50 MTA $2.75 $2.75 $116.50 42.4 n/a Cost of Bus Only Pass Multiple Notes 23.8 (base fare) 31.25 (CC fare) MUNI $2.25 $2.25 $83.00 36.9 $70 31.1 $1.75 - $5.90 $1.75 $237 59.3 WMATA SEPTA $2.25 $2.25 $91 40.4 n/a MARTA $2.50 $2.50 $95 38.0 n/a CTA $2.25 $2.00 $100 44.4 n/a TriMet $2.50 $2.50 $100 40.0 n/a $17.50 a week 40.0 $83 pass usable on BART stations within San Francisco $4 used as base fare for multiple calculation, 4 week passes in a month 7

Fare Policy Set by two documents 1) Fare Policy Statement: States policy objectives used to make fare decisions Satisfies 161A(5)(r) Last adopted in 2012 2) MBTA Tariff: Sets fare levels and transfer rules, pass validity, etc. -Up for review every 2 years per legislation 8

Existing Fare Policy Statement Adopted in 2012 1. Customer- and Community-Related Objectives a. Increase Ridership Utilization and Occupancy b. Establish Equitable Fares c. Enhance Mobility and Access 2. Financial and Privacy Objectives a. Maintain or Increase Fare Revenue Stream b. Maximize Fare Revenue Collection c. Respect Customer Privacy 9

Possible Policy Objectives 1. Increase revenue a. Maximize fare revenue collection b. Increase ridership c. Fare structure easy to understand d. Fares easy to pay 2. Improve Operations a. Shift ridership to under used capacity b. Reduce dwell times c. Minimize conflicts between operators and riders 3. Social and Environmental Goals a. Equitable fare structure b. Increase regional access and mobility c. Promote mode shift d. Respect Customer Privacy 10

Next Steps FMCB feedback on Fare Policy Objectives Revised Fare Policy statement Public input on Fare Policy statement FMCB adopts new Fare Policy statement FMCB considers Fare Change scenarios Public input on Proposed Fare Changes FMCB adopts Fare Changes as part of FY17 Budget Fare Changes take effect July 1, 2016 11