Total Maximum Daily Load. Evaluation. for. Twenty-One Stream Segments. in the Ogeechee River Basin. for. Fecal Coliform

Similar documents
CITY OF LYNDEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT MARCH 1, 2016

Fourth Creek (Subbasin ) Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin North Carolina

Meeting Agenda. Why are we here? Getting Started. Designated Uses. Water Quality Standards

Fecal Coliform TMDL for Saint Joes Creek, WBID 1668A

Total Coliform and Fecal Coliform TMDL for Lower Sweetwater Creek (WBID 1570A)

North Carolina Addendum Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Impaired Segments in the Dan River Watershed to Virginia TMDLs Approved by EPA Region 3

Fecal and Total Coliform TMDL for Sparkman Branch (WBID 1561)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration, Bureau of Watershed Restoration

FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING IN GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY: SUMMARY REPORT OF MONITORING RESULTS FOR

Fecal Coliform TMDL for Strawberry Creek (WBID 2239)

RE: PATAHA CREEK FECAL COLIFORM COMPLIANCE WITH WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

Lower St. Johns River Tributaries Fecal Coliform Basin Management Action Plan Jacksonville Environmental Symposium

Statistical Evaluation of BMP Effectiveness in Reducing Fecal Coliform Impairment in Mermentau River Basin

Assessment of Pathogen Strategies

Water Quality Trends for Patchogue Bay

ES Aircraft Deicing Document Identification Number Date: March 15, ) Activity Description:

Water Quality Trends for Conscience Bay

Tufts University Water: Systems, Science, and Society (WSSS) Program

City of Peoria Clean Water Efforts. Governor s s Conference on the Management of the Illinois River October 4, 2007

ASSESSMENT OF FECAL COLIFORM IN LITTLE RABBIT CREEK AND LITTLE SURVIVAL CREEK

Exploring Drivers of Fecal Coliform Pollution Trends in the Puget Sound. Washington Commercial Shellfish

SUTTER COUNTY. General Plan Update Technical Background Report

Town of Oakfield Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan

The north half of Section 18, Township 37 North, Range 6 East, Second Principal Meridian, Jefferson Township, Elkhart County, Indiana; also,

SECTION 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE RIVER BASIN

Total Maximum Daily Loads of Bacteria for Poquoson River and Back Creek in the City of Poquoson and in York County, Virginia

Pathogens and Grazing Livestock

Spatial Distribution and Characteristics of At-Risk Species in the Southeast U.S.

ANNUAL REPORT DALLAS LOVE FIELD AIRPORT. April 23, 2008

FINAL Water Year 2012 Bacteria Sampling Report for the Klamath River Estuary

ANNUAL REPORT DALLAS LOVE FIELD AIRPORT. March 14, 2006

O.C.G.A GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2014 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2014 Regular Session ***

Bacteria Contamination of Surface Waters Due to Livestock Grazing in the Stanislaus National Forest, California (Second Year of Study)

White Oak Creek. Recreational Use Attainability Analysis Summary of Findings. Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas

Loyalsock Creek Bacterial Coliforms. Presented By: Dr. Mel Zimmerman Clean Water Institute Lycoming College Matthew Bennett Jim Rogers

Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

Blue Earth River Basin Fecal Coliform TMDL Study

Portland Water District Sebago Lake Monitoring Programs Lower Bay Bacteria Monitoring Presenting data from 1977 to 2018 Laurel Jackson

Welcome KROSNO CREEK DIVERSION PROJECT CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Recreational Use Attainability Analysis Summary of Findings & Public Comment

Paul Sturm Roberto Viqueira Ríos

Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring for the Sleepy Creek Watershed Incremental 319 Project Final Report

This AC cancels AC 150/ , Construction or Establishment of Landfills Near Public Airports, dated August 8, 2000.

Finding sources of fecal coliform bacteria in stormwater runoff

Geoscape Toronto The Oak Ridges Moraine Activity 2 - Page 1 of 10 Information Bulletin

SF1363 / HF 1061: Legacy Funding; Conference Agreement

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

The Casco Bay Estuary Partnership (CBEP, formerly the Casco

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Version Isolated & Non-Waters Only 1 of 3

Fecal Coliform Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) - North Branch of the Sunrise River Final Report

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

The Evolution of DFW Airport s Deicing Program Balancing Risks with Results MAY 20, 2015

FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA SUMMARY SHEET

Analysis of Indicator Bacteria in NJ Dead-end Lagoons. Michael Callaghan Gasbarro Mentor: Dr. Kathryn Goddard

Land-Use and Water Quality Across the Cape Fear River Basin, NC: from 2001 to Jennifer Braswell Alford, PhD

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

Revealed Preference Methods

FILE: /PERM EFFECTIVE DATE: May 16, 2014 AMENDMENT:

Theme: Predominately natural/natural appearing; rustic improvements to protect resources. Size*: 2,500 + acres Infrastructure**:

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

Marchand Provincial Park. Management Plan

To all our cooperators from across California. be they ranchers, growers, or regulators, activists, resource managers, and the public THANK YOU!

Permittees under Sector S are primarily engaged in the following types of activities:

Sales Associate Course

Staff Report of Oakland Bay Activities 10/1/08 to 12/31/08. 1/15/09 Stephanie Kenny. Funded through Consolidated Contract # C14956

An Introduction. The Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern

WIFSS research on E. coli O157:H7 in central coastal California. Rob Atwill, D.V.M., Ph.D. University of California-Davis

Southern Shenandoah Valley Chapter

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

PCBS DELINEATION WORK PLAN

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

15A NCAC 02B.0311 has been amended with changes as published in 29:13 NCR as follows:

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 19 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

Classifications, Inventory and Level of Service

Sandbag Barrier. Suitable Applications Sandbag barriers may be suitable: As a linear sediment control measure:

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 22 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

Appalachian Power Company Smith Mountain Hydroelectric Project FERC No Debris Management Plan

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction


COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 8 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

April 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,

Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis

Lake County Municipal League 201 Innovation Awards Nomination

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

Tourism Impacts and Second Home Development in Coastal Counties: A Sustainable Approach

Bayview Escarpment. Interim Management Statement

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 8 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

Wilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill

Conservation of Critical Environmental Resources in Chatham Park

COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 18 SERVICE CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR

% farmers/private landowners in watershed applying BMPs. Other (Number of participants completed the training)

Case Study: 1. The Clarence River Catchment

45102 Super-Public Use Microdata Area (Super-PUMA) State ADAMS County

Transcription:

Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Twenty-One Stream Segments in the Ogeechee River Basin for Fecal Coliform Submitted to: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Submitted by: The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division January 2005

Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Background... 1 1.2 Watershed Description...1 1.3 Water Quality Standard...3 2.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT... 9 3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT... 10 3.1 Point Source Assessment... 10 3.2 Nonpoint Source Assessment... 14 4.0 ANALYTICAL APPROACH... 22 4.1 Loading Curve Approach... 22 5.0 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS... 25 5.1 Waste Load Allocations... 25 5.2 Load Allocations... 27 5.3 Seasonal Variation... 27 5.4 Margin of Safety... 28 5.5 Total Fecal Coliform Load... 28 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS... 31 6.1 Monitoring... 31 6.2 Fecal Coliform Management Practices... 31 6.3 Reasonable Assurance... 34 6.4 Public Participation... 34 7.0 INITIAL TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN... 35 REFERENCES... 39 Georgia Environmental Protection Division ii

List of Tables 1. Water Bodies Listed for Fecal Coliform Bacteria in the Ogeechee River Basin 2. Ogeechee River Basin Land Coverage 3. NPDES Facilities Discharging Fecal Coliform in the Ogeechee River Basin 4. Phase I Permitted MS4s in the Ogeechee River Basin 5. Phase II Permitted MS4s in the Ogeechee River Basin 6. Registered CAFOs in the Ogeechee River Basin 7. Deer Census Data in the Ogeechee River Basin 8. Estimated Agricultural Livestock Populations in the Ogeechee River Basin 9. Number of Septic Systems in the Ogeechee River Basin 10. Permitted Land Application Systems in the Ogeechee River Basin 11. Landfills in the Ogeechee River Basin 12. Monitoring Stations with Estimated Flow 13. WLAs for the Ogeechee River Basin 14. Fecal Coliform Loads and Required Fecal Coliform Load Reductions List of Figures 1. Impaired Stream Segments in HUC 03060201 2. Impaired Stream Segments in HUCs 03060202 and 03060203 3. Impaired Stream Segments in HUC 03060204 Appendixes A: 30-day Geometric Mean Fecal Coliform Monitoring Data B: Normalized Flows Versus Fecal Coliform Plots Georgia Environmental Protection Division iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The State of Georgia assesses its water bodies for compliance with water quality standards criteria established for their designated uses as required by the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA). Assessed water bodies are placed into one of three categories with respect to designated uses: 1) supporting, 2) partially supporting, or 3) not supporting. These water bodies are found on Georgia s 305(b) list as required by that section of the CWA that defines the assessment process, and are published in Water Quality in Georgia every two years. Some of the 305(b) partially and not supporting water bodies are also assigned to Georgia s 303(d) list, also named after that section of the CWA. Water bodies on the 303(d) list are required to have a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) evaluation for the water quality constituent(s) in violation of the water quality standard. The TMDL process establishes the allowable pollutant loadings or other quantifiable parameters for a water body based on the relationship between pollutant sources and instream water quality conditions. This allows water quality-based controls to be developed to reduce pollution and restore and maintain water quality. The State of Georgia has identified twenty-one (21) stream segments located in the Ogeechee River Basin as water quality limited due to fecal coliform. A stream is placed on the partial support list if more than 10% of the samples exceed the fecal coliform criteria and on the not support list if more than 25% of the samples exceed the standard. Water quality samples collected within a 30-day period that have a geometric mean in excess of 200 counts per 100 milliliters during the period May through October, or in excess of 1000 counts per 100 milliliters during the period November through April, are in violation of the bacteria water quality standard. There is also a single sample maximum criteria (4000 counts per 100 milliliters) for the months of November through April. The water use classification of all of the impacted streams is Fishing. An important part of the TMDL analysis is the identification of potential source categories. Sources are broadly classified as either point or nonpoint sources. A point source is defined as a discernable, confined, and discrete conveyance from which pollutants are or may be discharged to surface waters. Nonpoint sources are diffuse, and generally, but not always, involve accumulation of fecal coliform bacteria on land surfaces that wash off as a result of storm events. The process of developing fecal coliform TMDLs for the Ogeechee River Basin listed segments includes the determination of the following: The current critical fecal coliform load to the stream under existing conditions; The TMDL for similar conditions under which the current critical load was determined; and The percent reduction in the current critical fecal coliform load necessary to achieve the TMDL. The calculation of the fecal coliform load at any point in a stream requires the fecal coliform concentration and stream flow. The availability of water quality and flow data varies considerably among the listed segments. The Loading Curve Approach was used to determine the current fecal coliform load and TMDL. The fecal coliform loads and required reductions for each of the listed segments are summarized in the table below. Georgia Environmental Protection Division iv

Fecal Coliform Loads and Required Fecal Coliform Load Reductions Stream Segment Current Load (counts/ 30 days) WLA (counts/ 30 days) 1 WLAsw (counts/ 30 days) TMDL Components LA (counts/ 30 days) MOS (counts/ 30 days) TMDL (counts/ 30 days) Percent Reduction Big Creek 7.71E+12 3.04E+12 3.38E+11 3.38E+12 56 Buckhead Creek 1.35E+13 4.09E+10 5.41E+12 6.06E+11 6.06E+12 55 Canoochee River 7.22E+13 3.37E+10 2.98E+13 3.32E+12 3.32E+13 54 Casey Canal - Head of Canal to DeRenne Ave, Savannah 5.81E+15 1.59E+14 6.82E+13 2.52E+13 2.52E+14 96 Casey Canal - DeRenne Ave to Montgomery Crossroad, Savannah 5.81E+15 1.59E+14 6.82E+13 2.52E+13 2.52E+14 96 Cedar Creek 1.18E+10 1.32E+09 1.47E+08 1.47E+09 88 Fifteenmile Creek 1.54E+14 3.21E+13 3.57E+12 3.57E+13 77 Hayners Creek (known upstream as Casey Canal) 5.81E+15 1.59E+14 6.82E+13 2.52E+13 2.52E+14 96 Horse Creek 6.46E+10 3.63E+10 4.04E+09 4.04E+10 38 Little Ogeechee River -Two Mile Creek to Hamburg Pond nr Culverton 1.35E+12 1.29E+12 1.44E+11 1.44E+12 0 Little Ogeechee River - Little Ogeechee Pond to below US Hwy 17 2.08E+13 4.53E+10 1.46E+12 2.68E+12 4.65E+11 4.65E+12 78 Nevills Creek 4.00E+12 3.53E+12 3.93E+11 3.93E+12 2 North Fork Ogeechee River 1.58E+12 3.34E+10 2.14E+11 2.75E+10 2.75E+11 83 Ogeechee River 8.26E+12 1.78E+12 1.98E+11 1.98E+12 76 Peacock Creek 1.08E+10 9.53E+08 4.99E+09 6.60E+08 6.60E+09 39 Rocky Comfort Creek - Joes Creek to Ivey Branch near Edgehill 5.48E+12 1.39E+10 2.99E+12 3.34E+11 3.34E+12 39 Rocky Comfort Creek - Duhart Creek to Ogeechee River, Louisville 1.33E+13 2.87E+10 1.07E+13 1.19E+12 1.19E+13 10 Sculls Creek 3.35E+13 1.81E+13 2.01E+12 2.01E+13 40 Tenmile Creek 7.04E+12 1.48E+12 1.64E+11 1.64E+12 77 Williamson Swamp Creek - Hwy 24 to Limestone Creek, Davisboro 1.66E+13 5.28E+12 5.87E+11 5.87E+12 65 Williamson Swamp Creek - Mill Creek to Ogeechee River, Wadley 4.78E+13 2.82E+10 3.41E+12 3.82E+11 3.82E+12 92 Notes: 1 The assigned fecal coliform load from each NPDES permitted facility for WLA was determined as the product of the fecal coliform permit limit and the facility average monthly discharge at the time of the critical load. Georgia Environmental Protection Division v

Management practices that may be used to help reduce fecal coliform source loads include: Compliance with NPDES permit limits and requirements; Adoption of NRCS Conservation Practices; and Application of Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to reduce nonpoint sources. The amount of fecal coliform delivered to a stream is difficult to determine. However, by requiring and monitoring the implementation of these management practices, their effects will improve stream water quality, and represent a beneficial measure of TMDL implementation. Georgia Environmental Protection Division vi

1.1 Background 1.0 INTRODUCTION The State of Georgia assesses its water bodies for compliance with water quality standards criteria established for their designated uses as required by the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA). Assessed water bodies are placed into one of three categories with respect to designated uses: 1) supporting, 2) partially supporting, or 3) not supporting. These water bodies are found on Georgia s 305(b) list as required by that section of the CWA that addresses the assessment process, and are published in Water Quality in Georgia every two years (GA EPD, 2002-2003). Some of the 305(b) partially and not supporting water bodies are also assigned to Georgia s 303(d) list, also named after that section of the CWA. Water bodies on the 303(d) list are required to have a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) evaluation for the water quality constituent(s) in violation of the water quality standard. The TMDL process establishes the allowable loading of pollutants or other quantifiable parameters for a water body based on the relationship between pollution sources and in-stream water quality conditions. This allows water quality based controls to be developed to reduce pollution and restore and maintain water quality. The list identifies the waterbodies as either partially supporting or not supporting their designated use classifications, due to exceedances of water quality standards for fecal coliform bacteria. Fecal coliform bacteria are used as an indicator of the potential presence of pathogens in a stream. Table 1 presents the streams of the Ogeechee River Basin included on the 303(d) list for exceedances of the fecal coliform standard criteria. A total of seven stream segments were listed as partially supporting their designated use and fourteen stream segments were listed as not supporting their designated use. 1.2 Watershed Description The Ogeechee River Basin is located in mid to southeastern Georgia, encompassing approximately 5,540 square miles. The Ogeechee River Basin is bordered by the Oconee and Altamaha River Basins to the west and the Savannah River Basin to the east. The Ogeechee River originates in Greene County, in central Georgia. In the headwaters, the North and South Forks of the Ogeechee River join to form the Ogeechee River. The River then flows approximately 245 miles southeast toward the Atlantic Ocean. The Canoochee River originates in Emanuel County and flows southeast to join the Ogeechee River near Richmond Hill where it then flows to the Atlantic Ocean. The Ogeechee River Basin contains parts of Piedmont and Coastal Plain physiographic provinces, which extend throughout the southeastern United States. Georgia Environmental Protection Division 1

Table 1. Water Bodies Listed for Fecal Coliform Bacteria in the Ogeechee River Basin Stream Segment Location Segment Length (miles) Designated Use Listing Big Creek Kelley s Pond to Ogeechee River, Louisville (Jefferson Co) 5 Fishing PS Buckhead Creek Downstream Spring Mill Branch to Ogeechee River, Millen (Jenkins Co) 4 Fishing NS Canoochee River GA Hwy 192 to Fifteen Mile Creek near Metter (Emanuel/Candler Co) 21 Fishing PS Casey Canal Head of Canal to DeRenne Ave, Savannah (Chatham Co) 3 Fishing NS Casey Canal DeRenne Ave to Montgomery Crossroad, Savannah (Chatham Co) 3 Fishing NS Cedar Creek Water Hole Creek to Canoochee River, Claxton (Evans Co) 6 Fishing NS Fifteenmile Creek Stocking Head Branch to Canoochee River near Metter (Candler Co) 6 Fishing NS Hayners Creek (known upstream as Casey Canal) Casey Canal (Montgomery Crossroad) to Vernon River (Chatham Co) 2 Fishing NS Horse Creek Little Horse Creek to Ogeechee River near Rocky Ford (Screven Co) 5 Fishing NS Little Ogeechee River Little Ogeechee River Two Mile Creek to Hamburg Pond near Culverton (Hancock/Washington Co) Little Ogeechee Pond to below US Hwy 17 near Burroughs (Chatham Co) 9 Fishing PS 6 Fishing PS Nevills Creek Bay Gull Creek to Ogeechee River near Rocky Ford (Bulloch Co) 3 Fishing NS North Fork Ogeechee River Hwy 77 to Ogeechee River near Crawfordville (Greene/Taliaferro Co) 13 Fishing NS Ogeechee River Powell Creek to Beaverdam Creek near Powelton (Hancock Co) 5 Fishing NS Peacock Creek Hwy 144 to North Newport River near McIntosh (Liberty Co) 17 Fishing PS Rocky Comfort Creek Joes Creek to Ivey Branch near Edgehill (Glascock/Jefferson Co) 10 Fishing PS Rocky Comfort Creek Duhart Creek to Ogeechee River, Louisville (Jefferson Co) 6 Fishing PS Sculls Creek Richardson Creek to Ogeechee River near Scarboro (Jenkins Co) 4 Fishing NS Tenmile Creek Upstream Canoochee River, Excelsior (Candler Co) 3 Fishing NS Williamson Swamp Creek Hwy 24 to Limestone Creek, Davisboro (Washington/Jefferson Co) 12 Fishing NS Williamson Swamp Creek Mill Creek to Ogeechee River, Wadley (Jefferson Co) 9 Fishing NS Notes: PS = Partially Supporting designated uses NS = Not Supporting designated uses The USGS has divided the Ogeechee basin into four sub-basins, or Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs). Figures 1 through 3 show the locations of these sub-basins, the impaired segments within each sub-basin, and the associated counties within each sub-basin. The land use characteristics of the Ogeechee River Basin watersheds were determined using data from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) for Georgia. This coverage was produced from Landsat Thematic Mapper digital images developed in 1995. Land use classification is based on a modified Anderson level one and two system. Table 2 lists the watershed land coverage distribution of the 32 stream segments on the 303(d) list. Georgia Environmental Protection Division 2

1.3 Water Quality Standard The water use classification for the listed stream segments in the Ogeechee River Basin is Fishing. The criterion violated is listed as fecal coliform. The potential cause(s) listed include urban runoff, nonpoint sources, and municipal facilities. The use classification water quality standards for fecal coliform bacteria, as stated in the State of Georgia s Rules and Regulations for Water Quality Control, Chapter 391-3-6-.03(6)(c)(iii) (GA EPD, 2002), are: Bacteria: For the months of May through October, when water contact recreation activities are expected to occur, fecal coliform not to exceed a geometric mean of 200 per 100 ml based on at least four samples collected from a given sampling site over a 30-day period at intervals not less than 24 hours. Should water quality and sanitary studies show fecal coliform levels from non-human sources exceed 200/100 ml (geometric mean) occasionally, then the allowable geometric mean fecal coliform shall not exceed 300 per 100 ml in lakes and reservoirs and 500 per 100 ml in free flowing freshwater streams. For the months of November through April, fecal coliform not to exceed a geometric mean of 1,000 per 100 ml based on at least four samples collected from a given sampling site over a 30-day period at intervals not less than 24 hours and not to exceed a maximum of 4,000 per 100 ml for any sample. The State does not encourage swimming in surface waters since a number of factors, which are beyond the control of any State regulatory agency, contribute to elevated levels of fecal coliform. For waters designated as approved shellfish harvesting waters by the appropriate State agencies, the requirements will be consistent with those established by the State and Federal agencies responsible for the National Shellfish Sanitation Program. The requirements are found in the National Shellfish Sanitation Program Manual of Operation, Revised 1988, Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (PHS/FDA), and the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Streams designated as generally supporting shellfish are listed in Paragraph 391-3-6-.03(14). Georgia Environmental Protection Division 3

Georgia Environmental Protection Division 4

Georgia Environmental Protection Division 5

Georgia Environmental Protection Division 6

Table 2. Ogeechee River Basin Land Coverage Landuse Categories - Acres (Percent) Stream/Segment Open Water Residential High Intensity Commercial, Industrial, Transportation Bare Rock, Sand, Clay Quarries, Strip Mines, Gravel Pits Transitional Forest Row Crops Pasture, Hay Other Grasses (Urban, recreational; e.g. parks, lawns) Big Creek 252 20 21 43 3 2,307 28,720 23,867 1,710 3 6,801 17 63,763 NLCD (0.4) (0.0) (0.0) (0.1) (0.0) (3.6) (45.0) (37.4) (2.7) (0.0) (10.7) (0.0) Buckhead Creek 725 636 376 80-8,147 60,605 77,190 8,003 106 27,785 174 183,827 NLCD (0.4) (0.3) (0.2) (0.0) (0.0) (4.4) (33.0) (42.0) (4.4) (0.1) (15.1) (0.1) Canoochee River 1,228 874 542 82 346 14,572 69,887 36,879 3,659 137 9,722 46 137,974 NLCD (0.9) (0.6) (0.4) (0.1) (0.3) (10.6) (50.7) (26.7) (2.7) (0.1) (7.0) (0.0) Casey Canal 5 2,760 783 10-238 382 96 24 54 161 1 4,513 NLCD Head of Canal to DeRenne Ave, Savannah (0.1) (61.2) (17.3) (0.2) (0.0) (5.3) (8.5) (2.1) (0.5) (1.2) (3.6) (0.0) Casey Canal 125 4,433 1,607 27-576 1,358 456 43 422 555 18 9,618 NLCD DeRenne Ave to Montgomery Crossroad, Savannah (1.3) (46.1) (16.7) (0.3) (0.0) (6.0) (14.1) (4.7) (0.4) (4.4) (5.8) (0.2) Cedar Creek 482 278 97 32-2,267 14,471 16,166 2,806 28 3,168 14 39,808 NLCD (1.2) (0.7) (0.2) (0.1) (0.0) (5.7) (36.4) (40.6) (7.0) (0.1) (8.0) (0.0) Fifteenmile Creek 1,162 394 377 45 1 5,981 37,621 38,626 4,240 87 7,727 9 96,270 NLCD (1.2) (0.4) (0.4) (0.0) (0.0) (6.2) (39.1) (40.1) (4.4) (0.1) (8.0) (0.0) Hayners Creek (known upstream as Casey Canal) 144 4,630 1,631 27-593 1,490 458 43 429 559 87 10,092 NLCD (1.4) (45.9) (16.2) (0.3) (0.0) (5.9) (14.8) (4.5) (0.4) (4.3) (5.5) (0.9) Horse Creek 218 10 3 16-2,679 27,066 14,771 1,437 1 3,326 139 49,666 NLCD (0.4) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (5.4) (54.5) (29.7) (2.9) (0.0) (6.7) (0.3) Little Ogeechee River 173 138 94 16 92 1,392 23,937 3,648 1,524 37 146 2 31,199 NLCD Two Mile Creek to Hamburg Pond near Culverton (0.6) (0.4) (0.3) (0.1) (0.3) (4.5) (76.7) (11.7) (4.9) (0.1) (0.5) (0.0) Little Ogeechee River 296 468 259 30 79 1,657 17,215 2,143 425 33 12,092 187 34,884 NLCD Little Ogeechee Pond to below US Hwy 17 near Burroughs (0.8) (1.3) (0.7) (0.1) (0.2) (4.8) (49.3) (6.1) (1.2) (0.1) (34.7) (0.5) Nevills Creek 275 7 2 16 1 2,255 13,622 13,264 1,129-3,493 18 34,082 NLCD (0.8) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (6.6) (40.0) (38.9) (3.3) (0.0) (10.2) (0.1) North Fork Ogeechee River 32 257 184 25-578 16,202 1,135 658 59 53 3 19,185 NLCD (0.2) (1.3) (1.0) (0.1) (0.0) (3.0) (84.5) (5.9) (3.4) (0.3) (0.3) (0.0) Ogeechee River 129 594 443 80 2 3,250 72,021 3,923 3,352 152 184 3 84,134 NLCD (0.2) (0.0) (0.7) (0.5) (0.1) (0.0) (3.9) (85.6) (4.7) (4.0) (0.2) (0.2) Woody Wetlands Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands Total Landuse Source Georgia Environmental Protection Division 7

Landuse Categories - Acres (Percent) Stream/Segment Open Water Residential High Intensity Commercial, Industrial, Transportation Bare Rock, Sand, Clay Quarries, Strip Mines, Gravel Pits Transitional Forest Row Crops Pasture, Hay Other Grasses (Urban, recreational; e.g. parks, lawns) Peacock Creek 120 1,906 564 25 46 1,477 15,496 695 131 437 10,290 514 31,701 NLCD Woody Wetlands Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands (0.4) (6.0) (1.8) (0.1) (0.1) (4.7) (48.9) (2.2) (0.4) (1.4) (32.5) (1.6) Rocky Comfort Creek 769 711 265 107 297 12,159 74,106 26,171 4,514 103 6,321 12 125,535 NLCD Joes Creek to Ivey Branch near Edgehill (0.6) (0.6) (0.2) (0.1) (0.2) (9.7) (59.0) (20.8) (3.6) (0.1) (5.0) (0.0) Rocky Comfort Creek 1,050 832 350 151 297 15,439 95,865 51,821 6,622 120 11,584 68 184,199 NLCD Duhart Creek to Ogeechee River, Louisville (0.6) (0.5) (0.2) (0.1) (0.2) (8.4) (52.0) (28.1) (3.6) (0.1) (6.3) (0.0) Sculls Creek 216 15 7 16-2,358 20,131 15,491 1,183 10 3,823 6 43,255 NLCD (0.5) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (5.5) (46.5) (35.8) (2.7) (0.0) (8.8) (0.0) Tenmile Creek 530 34 238 23-1,149 9,806 14,296 1,510 3 2,544 34 30,166 NLCD (1.8) (0.1) (0.8) (0.1) (0.0) (3.8) (32.5) (47.4) (5.0) (0.0) (8.4) (0.1) Williamson Swamp Creek 523 827 337 66 28 5,885 40,410 31,724 4,950 110 9,195 6 94,062 NLCD Hwy 24 to Limestone Creek, Davisboro (0.6) (0.9) (0.4) (0.1) (0.0) (6.3) (43.0) (33.7) (5.3) (0.1) (9.8) (0.0) Williamson Swamp Creek 802 1,402 514 95 101 8,633 62,962 58,951 7,078 160 24,913 13 165,624 NLCD Mill Creek to Ogeechee River, Wadley (0.5) (0.8) (0.3) (0.1) (0.1) (5.2) (38.0) (35.6) (4.3) (0.1) (15.0) (0.0) Total Landuse Source Georgia Environmental Protection Division 8

2.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Stream segments are placed on the 303(d) list as partially supporting or not supporting their water use classification based on water quality sampling data. A stream is placed on the partial support list if more than 10% of the samples exceed the fecal coliform criteria and on the not support list if more than 25% of the samples exceed the standard. Water quality samples collected within a 30-day period that have a geometric mean in excess of 200 counts per 100 milliliters during the period May through October, or in excess of 1000 counts per 100 milliliters during the period November through April, are in violation of the bacteria water quality standard. There is also a single sample maximum criterion (4000 counts per 100 milliliters) for the months of November through April. Fecal coliform data were collected during calendar years 1997, 1998, 2002, and 2003. Sources of these data include the following: United States Geological Survey (USGS) basin water quality data, 1997, 1998, and 2002; Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GA EPD) Trend Monitoring data, 2002; and Chatham County and City of Savannah Water Quality Reassessment, 2003. These sources contained enough information to calculate a 30-day geometric mean and the data used for these TMDLs are presented in Appendix A. Georgia Environmental Protection Division 9

3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT An important part of the TMDL analysis is the identification of potential source categories. Sources are broadly classified as either point or nonpoint sources. A point source is defined as a discernable, confined, and discrete conveyance from which pollutants are or may be discharged to surface waters. Nonpoint sources are diffuse, and generally, but not always, involve accumulation of fecal coliform bacteria on land surfaces that wash off as a result of storm events. 3.1 Point Source Assessment Title IV of the Clean Water Act establishes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. Basically, there are two categories of NPDES permits: 1) municipal and industrial wastewater treatment facilities, and 2) regulated storm water discharges. 3.1.1 Wastewater Treatment Facilities In general, industrial and municipal wastewater treatment facilities have NPDES permits with effluent limits. These permit limits are either based on federal and state effluent guidelines (technology-based limits) or on water quality standards (water quality-based limits). The EPA has developed technology-based guidelines, which establish a minimum standard of pollution control for municipal and industrial discharges without regard for the quality of the receiving waters. These are based on Best Practical Control Technology Currently Available (BPT), Best Conventional Control Technology (BCT), and Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT). The level of control required by each facility depends on the type of discharge and the pollutant. The EPA and the states have also developed numeric and narrative water quality standards. Typically, these standards are based on the results of aquatic toxicity tests and/or human health criteria and include a margin of safety. Water quality-based effluent limits are set to protect the receiving stream. These limits are based on water quality standards that have been established for a stream based on its intended use and the prescribed biological and chemical conditions that must be met to sustain that use. Municipal and industrial wastewater treatment facilities discharges may contribute fecal coliform to receiving waters. There are sixteen NPDES permitted discharges with flows greater than 0.1 MGD identified in the Ogeechee River Basin that discharge treated municipal wastewater. Table 3 provides the monthly average discharge flows and fecal coliform concentrations for the municipal and industrial treatment facilities, obtained from calendar year 2002 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) data. The permitted flow and fecal coliform concentrations for these facilities are also included in this table. Combined sewer systems convey a mixture of raw sewage and storm water in the same conveyance structure to the wastewater treatment plant. These are considered a component of municipal wastewater treatment facilities. When the combined sewage exceeds the capacity of the wastewater treatment plant, the excess is diverted to a combined sewage overflow (CSO) discharge point. There are no permitted CSO outfalls in the Ogeechee River Basin. Georgia Environmental Protection Division 10

Table 3. NPDES Facilities Discharging Fecal Coliform in the Ogeechee River Basin Facility Name NPDES Permit No. Receiving Stream Actual 2002 Discharge Average Geometric Monthly Mean Flow (No./ 100 (MGD) 1 ml) 2 NPDES Permit Limits Average Monthly Flow (MGD) Average Monthly FC (No./ 100mL) Darien WPCP GA0033529 Cathead Creek Tributary 0.24 8.5 0.6 200 0 Gibson WPCP GA0021849 Rocky Comfort Creek 0.06 Not measured 0.21 No FC permit limit Hinesville/Fort Stewart WPCP GA0047180 Canoochee Cr Tributary 5.13 62.3 7.15 200 1 Larchmont Estates GA0034819 Larchmont Canal 0.20 32.8 0.2 200 0 Louisville Pond #1 GA0021580 Rocky Comfort Creek 0.22 Not measured 0.56 No FC permit limit Millen WPCP GA0031879 Buckhead Creek 0.19 6050.0 0.457 200 0 Midville WPCP GA0020028 Ogeechee River 0.02 Not measured 0.167 Pembroke Pond GA0033588 Unnamed Tributary to Mill Creek Tributary 0.13 Not measured 0.15 No FC permit limit No FC permit limit Pooler/Bloomingdale Reg. GA0047066 Hardin Canal 0.68 14.2 0.98 200 0 Richmond Hill - Elbow Swamp WPCP GA0037648 Elbow Swamp To Sterling Creek 0.99 Not measured 1.5 No FC permit limit Savannah Georgetown WPCP GA0046418 Ogeechee River 1.37 2.1 2.45 25 0 Statesboro WPCP GA0023108 Little Lotts Creek 3.22 5.2 10 200 0 Twin City WPCP GA0048666 Thick Creek-Canoochee Creek 0.25 Not measured 1 No FC permit limit Union Point WPCP GA0025429 North Fork Ogeechee River 0.16 1.8 0.45 200 0 Wadley Pond GA0021024 Williamson Swamp Creek 0.19 Not measured 0.215 Warrenton South WPCP GA0032786 Rocky Comfort Creek 0.11 Not measured 0.295 Source: EPA PCS Website (2002) and the GA EPD Regional Offices Notes: 1 Values shown are the annual average of the monthly average flows. 2 Values shown are the annual average of the monthly geometric means. No FC permit limit No FC permit limit Number of Violations July 1998- June 2002 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Georgia Environmental Protection Division 11

3.1.2 Regulated Storm Water Discharges Some storm water runoff is covered under the NPDES Permit Program. It is considered a diffuse source of pollution. Unlike other NPDES permits that establish end-of-pipe limits, storm water NPDES permits establish controls to the maximum extent practicable (MEP). Currently, regulated storm water discharges that may contain fecal coliform bacteria consist of those associated with industrial activities including construction sites disturbing one acre or greater, and large, medium, and small municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) that serve populations of 50,000 or more. Storm water discharges associated with industrial activities are currently covered under a General Storm Water NPDES Permit. This permit requires visual monitoring of storm water discharges, site inspections, implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs), and record keeping. Storm water discharges from MS4s are very diverse in pollutant loadings and frequency of discharge. At present, all cities and counties within the state of Georgia that had a population of greater than 100,000 at the time of the 1990 Census, are permitted for their storm water discharge under Phase I. This includes 60 permittees in Georgia, with about 45 located in the greater Atlanta metro area. Table 4 lists those counties and communities located in the Ogeechee River Basin that are covered by the Phase I General Storm Water Permits. Table 4. Phase I Permitted MS4s in the Ogeechee River Basin Name Permit No. Watershed Chatham County GAS000206 Ogeechee, Savannah Garden City GAS000208 Ogeechee, Savannah Pooler GAS000209 Ogeechee, Savannah Savannah GAS000205 Ogeechee, Savannah Thunderbolt GAS000211 Ogeechee Tybee GAS000212 Ogeechee, Savannah Source: Nonpoint Source Program, GA EPD, 2003 Phase I MS4 permits require the prohibition of non-storm water discharges (i.e., illicit discharges) into the storm sewer systems and controls to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including the use of management practices, control techniques and systems, as well as design and engineering methods (Federal Register, 1990). A sitespecific Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) outlining appropriate controls is required by and referenced in the permit. As of March 10, 2003, small MS4s serving urbanized areas are required to obtain a storm water permit under the Phase II storm water regulations. An urbanized area is defined as an entity with a residential population of at least 50,000 people and an overall population density of at least 1,000 people per square mile. Thirty counties and 56 communities are permitted under the Phase II regulations in Georgia. Table 5 lists those counties and communities located in the Ogeechee River Basin that are covered by the Phase II General Storm Water Permit, GAG610000. Georgia Environmental Protection Division 12

Table 5. Phase II Permitted MS4s in the Ogeechee River Basin Name Allenhurst Fleming Hinesville Vernonburg Watershed Ogeechee Ogeechee Ogeechee Ogeechee Walthourville Ogeechee Source: Nonpoint Source Program, GA EPD, 2004 3.1.3 Confined Animal Feeding Operations Confined livestock and confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are characterized by high animal densities. This results in large quantities of fecal material being contained in a limited area. Processed agricultural manure from confined hog, dairy cattle, and select poultry operations is generally collected in lagoons. It is then applied to pastureland and cropland as a fertilizer during the growing season, at rates that often vary monthly. In 1990, the State of Georgia began registering CAFOs. Many of the CAFOs were issued land application or NPDES permits for treatment of wastewaters generated from their operations. The type of permit issued depends on the operation size (i.e., number of animal units). Table 6 presents the swine and non-swine (primarily dairies) CAFOs located in the Ogeechee River Basin that are registered or have land application permits. Table 6. Registered CAFOs in the Ogeechee River Basin Name City County Animal Type Total No. of Animals Permit No. Bay Branch Farms Claxton Evans Swine 2,495 GAU700000 Bell's Dairy Greensboro Greene Dairy 200 GAU700000 Cabaniss Dairy L.L.C. Maxeys Oglethorpe Dairy 1,200 GAG930006 C-M Farms/Orangeburg Foods, Inc. Register Candler Swine 2,400 GAU700000 Drayben Dairy White Plains Taliaferro Dairy 340 GAU700000 Dunn Sausage Company Mitchell Glascock Swine GAU700000 Eley Acres Farm White Plains Greene Dairy 185 GAU700000 Franks' Farm Waynesboro Burke Dairy 225 GAU700000 G & S Dairy Warrenton Warren Dairy 260 GAU700000 J.B. Gay & Son Inc. Garfield Emanuel Dairy 300 GAU700000 J.B. Gay & Son Inc. Millen/Garfield Jenkins Swine 1,100 GAU700000 JAA Dunrovin Farm Mitchell Glascock Swine 1,600 GAU700000 Larry Holdeman Dairy Bartow Jefferson Dairy 170 GAU700000 Long Branch Dairy White Plains Taliaferro Dairy 350 GAU700000 Pineland Dairy Waynesboro Burke Dairy 699 GAU700000 Sandhill Farms (ex-webb Brothers) Twin City Candler Swine 6,400 GA0038261 Saxon Dairy Perkins Jenkins Dairy 400 GAU700000 Georgia Environmental Protection Division 13

Name City County Animal Type Total No. of Animals Permit No. Scattered Acres Farm Claxton Evans Swine 2,495 GAU700000 Smith-Healy Farms, Inc. Statesboro Bulloch Swine 5,000 GA0038199 Visscher Dairy Stapleton Jefferson Dairy 650 GAU700000 W. W. Ball Farms Statesboro Bulloch Swine 2,000 GAU700000 Walnut Branch Farm Davisboro Washington Dairy/Beef 673 GAU700000 Source: Permitting Compliance and Enforcement Program, EPD, GA EPD, 2004 3.2 Nonpoint Source Assessment In general, nonpoint sources cannot be identified as entering a waterbody through a discrete conveyance at a single location. Typical nonpoint sources of fecal coliform bacteria include: Wildlife Agricultural Livestock o Animal grazing o Animal access to streams o Application of manure to pastureland and cropland Urban Development o Leaking sanitary sewer lines o Leaking septic systems o Land Application Systems o Landfills In urban areas, a large portion of storm water runoff may be collected to storm sewer systems and discharged through distinct outlet structures. For large urban areas, these storm sewer discharge points may be regulated as described in Section 3.1.2. 3.2.1 Wildlife The importance of wildlife as a source of fecal coliform bacteria in streams varies considerably, depending on the animal species present in the subwatersheds. Based on information provided by the Wildlife Resources Division (WRD) of GA DNR, the animals that spend a large portion of their time in or around aquatic habitats are the most important wildlife sources of fecal coliform. Waterfowl, most notably ducks and geese, are considered to potentially be the greatest contributors of fecal coliform. This is because they are typically found on the water surface, often in large numbers, and deposit their feces directly into the water. Other potentially important animals regularly found around aquatic environments include racoons, beavers, muskrats, and to a lesser extent, river otters and minks. Population estimates of these animal species in Georgia are currently not available. White-tailed deer have a significant presence throughout the Ogeechee River Basin. The 2001 deer census for counties in the Ogeechee River Basin is presented in Table 7. Georgia Environmental Protection Division 14

Table 7. Deer Census Data in the Ogeechee River Basin 2001-2005 County Optimum population (number/sq mi) Bryan 20 Bulloch 30 Burke 35 Candler 30 Chatham 20 Effingham 35 Emanuel 35 Evans 30 Glascock 35 Greene 35 Hancock 35 Jefferson 35 Jenkins 35 Liberty 20 Long 20 McIntosh 20 Screven 35 Taliaferro 35 Tattnall 30 Warren 35 Washington 35 Source: Wildlife Resources Division, GA DNR, 2001 Fecal coliform bacteria contributions from deer to water bodies are generally considered less significant than that of waterfowl, racoons, and beavers. This is because a greater portion of their time is spent in terrestrial habitats. This also holds true for other terrestrial mammals such as squirrels and rabbits, and terrestrial birds (GA WRD, 2002). However, feces deposited on the land surface can result in the introduction of fecal coliform to streams during runoff events. It should be noted that between storm events, considerable decomposition of the fecal matter might occur, resulting in a decrease in the associated fecal coliform numbers. This is especially true in the warm, humid environments typical of the southeast. 3.2.2 Agricultural Livestock Agricultural livestock are a potential source of fecal coliform to streams in the Ogeechee River Basin. The animals grazing on pastureland deposit their feces onto land surfaces, where it can be transported during storm events to nearby streams. Animal access to pastureland varies monthly, resulting in varying fecal coliform loading rates throughout the year. Beef cattle spend all of their time in pastures, while dairy cattle and hogs are periodically confined. In addition, agricultural livestock will often have direct access to streams that pass through their pastures, and can thus impact water quality in a more direct manner (USDA, 2002). Table 8 provides the estimated number of beef cattle, dairy cattle, goats, horse, swine, sheep, and chickens by category reported by county. These data were provided by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and are based on 2003 data. Georgia Environmental Protection Division 15

Table 8. Estimated Agricultural Livestock Populations in the Ogeechee River Basin County Beef Cattle Livestock Dairy Cattle Goats Horses Hogs Sheep Chickens- Layers Chickens- Broilers Sold Chickens- Breeders Bryan 612-300 135 - - - - Bulloch 10,110-1,700 2,450 3,315 80 702,000 - - Burke 10,950 2,500 1,200 550 50 25 - - - Candler 6,500 75 208 60 7,700 246 200,000 - - Chatham 400-60 - - - - Effingham 3,500-800 850 400 - - - Emanuel 12,400-2,000 480 600 - - - Evans 4,920-400 125 1,250 1,404,000 96,000 40,000 Glascock 4,000-500 55 150 - - - Greene 8,190 3,100 175 305-1,434,000 - - Hancock 4,650 150 500 475 - - - - Jefferson 11,800 1,200 2,500 80 500 10 - - - Jenkins 4,574 2,300 300 25 1,000-50,000 - Liberty 1,600-20 40 - - - - Long 2,300-80 50 80 536,000 20,000 - McIntosh 150-40 - 30 - - - Screven 8,000 200 2,000 300 600 100 - - - Taliaferro - - - - - - - Tattnall 13,200-3,500 650 1,050 700 8,892,000-66,000 Warren 8,260 1,450 1,950 2,200 1,050 - - - Washington 7,000 600 3,500 650 50 - - - Source: NRCS, 2003 3.2.3 Urban Development Fecal coliform from urban areas are attributable to multiple sources, including: domestic animals, leaks and overflows from sanitary sewer systems, illicit discharges, leaking septic systems, runoff from improper disposal of waste materials, and leachate from both operational and closed landfills. Urban runoff can contain high concentrations of fecal coliform from domestic animals and urban wildlife. Fecal coliform enter streams by direct washoff from the land surface, or the runoff may be diverted to a storm water collection system and discharged through a discrete outlet structure. For large, medium, and small urban areas (populations greater than 50,000), the storm water outlets are regulated under MS4 permits (see Section 3.1.2). For smaller urban areas, the storm water discharge outlets currently remain unregulated. In addition to urban animal sources of fecal coliform, there may be illicit connections to the storm sewer system. As part of the MS4 permitting program, municipalities are required to conduct dry-weather monitoring to identify and then eliminate these illicit discharges. Georgia Environmental Protection Division 16

Fecal coliform may also enter streams from leaky sewer pipes, or during storm events when combined sewer overflows discharge. 3.2.3.1 Leaking Septic Systems A portion of the fecal coliform in the Ogeechee River Basin may be attributed to failure of septic systems and illicit discharges of raw sewage. Table 9 presents the number of septic systems in each county of the Ogeechee River Basin existing in 1990, based on U.S. 1990 Census Data, and the number existing in 2002, based on the Georgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health data. In addition, an estimate of the number of septic systems installed and repaired during the twelve-year period from 1990 to 2002 is given. Table 9. Number of Septic Systems in the Ogeechee River Basin Existing Septic Systems (1990) Existing Septic Systems (2002) No. of Septic Systems Installed (1990 to 2002) No. of Septic Systems Repaired (1990 to 2002) County Bryan 4,943 7,765 2,822 107 Bulloch 8,873 16,668 7,795 629 Burke 7,992 10,352 2,360 288 Candler 1,012 2,192 1,180 75 Chatham 11,987 14,183 2,196 750 Effingham 7,547 14,047 6,500 1,300 Emanuel 4,672 7,129 2,457 273 Evans 2,065 3,296 1,231 75 Glascock 708 918 210 6 Greene 2,759 5,129 2,370 228 Hancock 2,488 3,754 1,256 41 Jefferson 3,551 5,051 1,500 45 Jenkins 1,026 1,801 775 17 Liberty 7,002 10,260 3,258 32 Long 2,638 4,127 1,489 27 McIntosh 957 1,951 994 NA Screven 6,005 7,383 1,378 29 Taliaferro 551 691 140 NA Tattnall 3,926 6,310 2,384 80 Warren 1,395 1,825 430 72 Washington 4,065 5,951 1,886 40 Source: 1990 Census Data, and the Georgia Dept. of Human Resources, Div. of Public Health, 2004 These data show that a substantial increase in the number of septic systems has occurred in several counties. This is generally a reflection of population increases outpacing the expansion of sewage collection systems during this period. Hence, a large number of septic systems are installed to contain and treat the sanitary waste. It is estimated that there are approximately 2.37 people per household on septic systems (EPA, personal communication). Georgia Environmental Protection Division 17

3.2.3.2 Land Application Systems Many smaller communities use land application systems (LAS) for treatment of their sanitary wastewaters. These facilities are required through LAS permits to treat all their wastewater by land application and are to be properly operated as non-discharging systems that contribute no runoff to nearby surface waters. However, runoff during storm events may carry surface residual containing fecal coliform bacteria to nearby surface waters. Some of these facilities may also exceed the ground percolation rate when applying the wastewater, resulting in surface runoff from the field. If not properly bermed, this runoff, which probably contains fecal coliform bacteria, may discharge to nearby surface waters. There are fifteen permitted LAS systems located in the Ogeechee River Basin (Table 10). Table 10. Permitted Land Application Systems in the Ogeechee River Basin LAS Name County Permit No. Type Flow (MGD) Bartow LAS Jefferson GA02-215 Municipal 0.05 Chatham County Pine Barren Chatham GA02-285 Municipal 0.06 Chemtall Inc. Liberty GA01-403 Industrial 0.0383 Claxton LAS Evans GA02-111 Municipal 0.52 Claxton Poultry Evans GA01-415 Industrial 1.6 Claxton Poultry Farms Inc. Evans GA01-380 Industrial 1.15 Davisboro LAS Washington GA02-242 Municipal 0.3 Metter LAS Candler GA02-185 Municipal 1.0 Midway Industrial Park Liberty GA02-094 Municipal 0.05 Midway LAS Liberty GA02-131 Municipal 0.5 Sandhill Farms Candler GA01-355 Private 0.66 Skidaway Island Utilities Chatham GA03-941 Private 1.25 USA Army Fort Stewart/Camp Oliver Evans GA03-624 Federal 0.07 USA Army Fort Stewart/Wright Army Airfield Liberty GA03-834 Federal 0.0018 Waterford Landing Development Bryan GA03-768 Private 0.152 Source: Permitting Compliance and Enforcement Program, GA EPD, 2004 3.2.3.3 Landfills Leachate from landfills may contain fecal coliform bacteria that may at some point discharge into surface waters. Sanitary (or municipal) landfills are the most likely to serve as a source of fecal coliform bacteria. These types of landfills receive household wastes, animal manure, offal, hatchery and poultry processing plant wastes, dead animals, and other types of wastes. Older sanitary landfills were not lined and most have been closed. Those that remain active and have not been lined operate as construction/demolition landfills. Currently active sanitary landfills are lined and have leachate collection systems. All landfills, excluding inert landfills, are now required to install environmental monitoring systems for groundwater and methane sampling. There are 101 known landfills in the Ogeechee River Basin (Table 11). Of these, ten are active Georgia Environmental Protection Division 18

landfills and 91 are inactive or closed. As shown in the Table 11, many of the older, inactive landfills were never permitted. Table 11. Landfills in the Ogeechee River Basin Name County Permit No. Type Status Bryan County - Hwy 17 Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Bryan County - Hwy 204 Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Bryan County - Northwest Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Bryan County - Richmond Hill Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Bryan County - SR 144 Spur Phase 1 Bryan 015-005D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Bryan County - SR 144 Spur Phase 2 Bryan 015-008D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Bryan County -US 280 / Mill Creek Bryan 015-004D Sanitary Landfill Closed Ellabell Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Grovetown (or Groveland) Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Keller Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Lanier Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Pembroke (new site) Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Pembroke (old site) Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Tac - X - Ft. Stewart Bryan Not Applicable Inactive Brooklet Bulloch 016-005D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Portal Bulloch Not Applicable Inactive Statesboro - Lakeview Road Bulloch 016-011P Not Applicable Inactive Statesboro - Lakeview Road Bulloch 016-007D Sanitary Landfill Closed Stilson Bulloch Not Applicable Inactive Gough Burke Not Applicable Inactive Midville Burke Not Applicable Inactive Candler County - SR 121 Metter Sanitary Candler 021-001D Sanitary Landfill Closed Candler County - SR 121 PH2 Construction & Construction and Candler 021-005D Demolition Landfill Demolition Landfill Closed Candler County - SR 121 Phase 2 Municipal Municipal Solid Candler 021-006D Solid Waste Landfill Waste Landfill Active C.L. Lewis Landfill Chatham Not Applicable Inactive Carter - Quacco Road Chatham 025-063D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Chatham County - Chevis Road Chatham 025-038D Dry Trash Landfill Ceased accepting waste Chatham County - I-16 Bloomingdale Chatham 025-040D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Chatham County - Sharon Park Chatham 025-057D Dry Trash Landfill Ceased accepting waste Chatham County - SR 367 Wilmington Island Chatham 025-058D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Chatham County - Thomas Ave. Chatham 025-056D Dry Trash Landfill Active Clay - Ric - US 80/ Dean Forest Road Chatham 025-065D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Clifton - Site #3 (Hwy 17) Chatham 025-044D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Crosby - Quacco Road Chatham 025-068D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Greenbriar Subdivision Chatham 025-003D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Hunter Army Air Field Chatham Not Applicable Inactive MacMillan - Dean Forest Road Chatham 025-066D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Metro Waste Chatham 025-016D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Savannah Chatham 025-004D Sanitary Landfill Inactive Georgia Environmental Protection Division 19

Name County Permit No. Type Status Savannah - Bacon Park Chatham 025-010D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Savannah - Dean Forest Road Chatham 025-051D Sanitary Landfill Active Savannah - U.S. 17 Chatham 025-043D Sanitary Landfill Inactive Savannah Phase II and III Chatham 025-021D Sanitary Landfill Inactive Superior Landfill and Recycling Center Chatham 025-070D Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Active Superior Sanitation - Little Neck Road Chatham 025-045D Sanitary Landfill Closed Tennessee Ave. - Savannah Chatham 025-011D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Tuten - Middleground Road Chatham 025-042D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Wilmington Island Chatham 025-039D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Effingham County - SR 17 Guyton Effingham 051-005D Sanitary Landfill Ceased accepting waste Guyton Effingham Not Applicable Inactive Yarbrough Effingham Not Applicable Inactive Emanuel County - US 80 Emanuel Not Applicable Inactive Garfield Emanuel 053-003D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Twin City Emanuel Not Applicable Inactive Evans County - Little Bull Creek Evans APL-0542 Construction and Demolition Landfill Inactive Evans County - Sikes Branch Claxton Evans 054-005D Dry Trash Landfill Active Evans County - U.S. 301 Claxton Evans 054-004D Sanitary Landfill Closed Gibson - CR 50 Phase 1 Glascock 062-002D Sanitary Landfill Closed Jefferson County - Materials Recovery Facility Jefferson 081-010P Materials Recovery Facility Jefferson County - U.S. 1 - Avera Road Jefferson 081-006D Sanitary Landfill Georgia Environmental Protection Division 20 Inactive Ceased accepting waste Jefferson County - CR 138 Municipal Solid Municipal Solid Jefferson 081-011D Active Waste Landfill Waste Landfill Wadley - Artesian Street Jefferson 081-008D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Wrens - Industrial Street Jefferson 081-009D Sanitary Landfill Jenkins County - CR 54 Phase 2 MSWL & C&D Site Ceased accepting waste Jenkins 082-005D Sanitary Landfill Active Jenkins County - CR 54 SL Jenkins 082-004D Sanitary Landfill Ceased accepting waste Jenkins County - Old Louisville Road Jenkins 082-002D Sanitary Landfill Closed Millen - U.S. 25 S Jenkins 082-003D Dry Trash Landfill Closed City of Hinesville Liberty 089-008D Dry Trash Landfill Inactive Hinesville (new site) Liberty Not Applicable Inactive Hinesville (old site) Liberty Not Applicable Inactive Liberty County - CR 194 #3 Liberty 089-014P Not Applicable Inactive Liberty County - Hinesville (Hwy 196) Liberty Not Applicable Inactive Liberty County - Limerick Road Liberty 089-013P Not Applicable Inactive Liberty County - CR 194 No. 3 Liberty 089-011D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Liberty County - Limerick Road L Liberty 089-016D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Liberty County - Limerick Road SL Liberty 089-003D Sanitary Landfill Closed Midway Liberty Not Applicable Inactive Sunbury Liberty Not Applicable Inactive U.S. Army Ft. Stewart Main Cantonment (L) Liberty 089-020D Dry Trash Landfill Active

Name County Permit No. Type Status U.S. Army Ft. Stewart Main Cantonment Liberty 089-010D Sanitary Landfill Active Yellow Bluff Liberty Not Applicable Inactive Crescent McIntosh Not Applicable Inactive Darien - US 17 North McIntosh 098-004D Dry Trash Landfill Closed DNR, Sapelo Island #2 McIntosh 098-005D Dry Trash Landfill Closed Eulonia McIntosh Not Applicable Inactive McIntosh County - King Road McIntosh 098-003D Sanitary Landfill Active Meridian McIntosh Not Applicable Inactive Shellman Bluff McIntosh Not Applicable Inactive Townsend McIntosh Not Applicable Inactive Young Man Road McIntosh Not Applicable Inactive Youngs Island McIntosh Not Applicable Inactive Rocky Ford MSWL Site No. 2 Screven 124-005D Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Inactive Screven County - Rocky Ford Road Screven 124-003D Sanitary Landfill Closed Crawfordville Taliaferro Not Applicable Inactive Manassas - Old Bellville Road Tattnall Not Applicable Inactive Tattnall Co. - Hwy 23 Tattnall Not Applicable Inactive Warren County - Shoal Street No. 2 Warren 149-008D Sanitary Landfill Closed Warren County - SR 16 Warren 149-002D Sanitary Landfill Inactive Warrenton Warren Not Applicable Inactive Davisboro Washington Not Applicable Inactive Riddleville Washington Not Applicable Inactive Source: Land Protection Branch, GA DNR, 2003 Georgia Environmental Protection Division 21