LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report

Similar documents
The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

The regional value of tourism in the UK: 2013

Estimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism

The Economic Impact of Tourism West Oxfordshire Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

% change vs. Dec ALL VISITS (000) 2,410 12% 7,550 5% 31,148 1% Spend ( million) 1,490 15% 4,370-1% 18,710 4%

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

Regional Spread of Inbound Tourism. VisitBritain Research, August 2018

The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2015

The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2016

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2014

The tourism value of the natural environment and outdoor activities in

The Economic Impact of Tourism West Oxfordshire Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Dover Results. Produced by: Destination Research

The Economic Impact of Tourism

An overview of the importance and economic contribution of the visitor economy in Dorset

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

Methodology and coverage of the survey. Background

The Economic Impact of Poole s Visitor Economy 2015

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

West Somerset 2015 Local data version

Kent Visitor Economy Barometer 2016

Visit Wales Research Update

PREMIUM TRAFFIC MONITOR AUGUST 2015 KEY POINTS

The Economic Impact of Travel in Minnesota Analysis

PREMIUM TRAFFIC MONITOR OCTOBER 2015 KEY POINTS

REPORT. VisitEngland Business Confidence Monitor Wave 5 Autumn

PREMIUM TRAFFIC MONITOR JULY 2014 KEY POINTS

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County. July 2017

Travel and Tourism in Ukraine: Key Trends and Opportunities to 2016

Status of Compilation of Tourism Satellite Accounts for India

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

the research solution

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, June 2018

Complaints Data Analysis: 2018 H1

1. Summary dashboard Introduction The strategy targets... 4

Quarterly Bulletin of Statistics

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Thanet Results. Produced by: Destination Research

SHREWSBURY TOURISM ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Index of business confidence. Monthly FTK (Billions) June 2012 vs. June 2011 YTD 2012 vs. YTD 2011 RPK ASK PLF FTK AFTK FLF RPK ASK PLF FTK AFTK FLF

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

REPORT. VisitEngland 2010 Business Confidence Monitor. Wave 1 New Year

IGI Wallcoverings Sales Statistics. Operations in Report to Member Companies. 15 July Contents. Introduction 3

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at:

Index of business confidence. Monthly FTK (Billions) Aug 2013 vs. Aug 2012 YTD 2013 vs. YTD 2012 Aug 2013 vs. Jul 2013

Visitor Attraction Trends in England Full Report

Introduction 3. Accommodation 4. Ireland Market 5. Activity Providers, Attractions, Retail and Transport 6. Overseas Market Performance 7.

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2010

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Introduction 3. Accommodation 4. Ireland Market 5. Activity Providers, Attractions, Retail, Restaurants and Transport 6. Overseas Market Performance 7

Trends & Statistics - July 2013

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

AIR PASSENGER MARKET ANALYSIS

2017 VISITOR STATISTICS WASHINGTON, DC

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

Tourism Snapshot. A focus on the markets in which the CTC and its partners are active. January 2013 Volume 9, Issue 1.

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

Regional Spread of Inbound Tourism

Case study: outbound tourism from New Zealand

East Lothian. Skills Assessment January SDS-1154-Jan16

TELFORD & WREKIN TOURISM ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Queensland Economic Update

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

ANA Holdings Financial Results for the Third Quarter of FY2013

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

Crown copyright Published with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty s Stationery Office (HMSO). ISBN ISSN

February 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

Index of business confidence. Monthly FTK (Billions) Sep 2013 vs. Sep 2012 YTD 2013 vs. YTD 2012 Sep 2013 vs. Aug 2013

Latest Tourism Trends. Humphrey Walwyn Head of VisitEngland Research

VALUE OF TOURISM. Trends from

AIR PASSENGER MARKET ANALYSIS JUNE 2015 KEY POINTS

Rail Sta s cs Compendium Great Britain Annual

Domestic, U.S. and Overseas Travel to Canada

IATA ECONOMIC BRIEFING DECEMBER 2008

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

Domestic Tourism to South West Wales in 2006, 2007 and 2008 Factsheet

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Ireland

Transcription:

LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL Wandsworth borough report London Development Agency May 2008

CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 3 2. Tourism in London and the UK: recent trends... 4 3. The LATI model: a brief methodological guide... 7 4. Tourism in Wandsworth: borough level estimates... 8 2 LATI model Wandsworth Borough Report

1. Introduction The aim of this report is to provide borough level estimates of tourism expenditure set in the context of recent tourism trends for London and the UK. Set out below is the structure of the report and some basic information about why and how the London Development Agency (LDA) is producing borough level tourism estimates. There is also a discussion of national surveys which provide London level tourism data. The section following this introduction outlines trends in tourism for London and the UK since the start of the decade. The section also details problems with, and efforts to improve, London tourism day visitor data. There follows a brief methodological guide to how the borough level estimates of tourism expenditure are derived using the LDA s Local Area Tourism Impact (LATI) model. The final section of the report presents borough level estimates themselves for the London borough of Wandsworth for the period 2004 to 2006. The importance and share of tourism in Wandsworth relative to other London boroughs is also discussed. Tourism is an important source of income and employment to London boroughs and the UK in general. However, due to the fragmented nature of the tourism sector it has traditionally proved difficult to measure particularly at a local level. National surveys currently provide tourism value and volume data for London as a whole, but until recently there has been no consistent approach to measuring tourism at borough level. In simple terms the LATI model uses the most robust available information to share London level tourism data out across the boroughs. The resulting estimates of tourism expenditure are both consistent and comparable across boroughs, and with London level data from the national tourism surveys. The centrally operated model is cost effective way to produce tourism estimates compared with boroughs paying for their own individual pieces of research. A number of national tourism surveys provide London level data for the LATI model. The International Passenger Survey (IPS) is conducted by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and measures the value and volume of overseas visitors to the UK and London. Domestic visitors staying overnight are monitored by VisitBritain using the UK Tourism Survey (UKTS). There has been a lack of London level information on the value and volume of tourism day visits. Steps to collect more timely and complete London level day visitor data are currently being taken by the LDA and with other Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) and ONS. More details are provided below. LATI model Wandsworth Borough Report 3

2. Tourism in London and the UK: recent trends This section covers recent tourism trends for London and the UK to provide context for borough level tourism estimates presented later for 2004 to 2006. Key features of the data are a reduction in domestic overnight stays in London and the UK over recent years and higher numbers of international visitors. These trends broadly reflect the lower costs of international travel and wider range of European and global destinations available to UK consumers. The table below summarises the latest annual data available for London. International tourism In 2006 overseas visitors spent 7.8 billion in London. This amount was up 14% on the previous year and the fourth consecutive annual rise in expenditure, reflecting increased numbers of international visitors. Chart 1 shows annual changes in overseas visitor spending in London and the rest of the UK since 2000. Fluctuations in spending are similar for London and the rest of the UK, reflecting the Capital s role as a gateway for international visitors to other parts of the country. Of the 32.7 million international tourists that the UK received in 2006 almost half (15.6 million) visited London. In 2000 overseas visitor spending stood at 6.9 billion in London and 5.9 billion in the rest of the UK. In 2001 and 2002, however, levels of international tourism fell sharply. The decline followed an outbreak of foot and mouth disease in the UK and was reinforced by the September 11 terrorist attacks. It is noticeable that during this period London experienced a sharper downturn in overseas tourism compared to other parts of the UK. Expenditure levels showed a recovery in the second half of 2002 and a modest increase in 2003. The rate of growth in spending picked up in 2004 before easing in 2005 (likely as a result of the July 7 bombings in London) then reaccelerated sharply in 2006. Analysis of IPS data indicates that from 2004 to 2006 the largest contributors to growth in overseas visits to London were those from Poland, Spain and France. Table 1 The value and volume of tourism for London in 2006 Greater London Overseas visitors Domestic visitors Day visitors Totals Day visits (3+ hours) - - 132.4 132.4 Overnight visits 15.6 11.0-26.6 Spending ( )* 7,822 2,270 5,161 15,253 All figures in millions Sources: IPS, UKTS, Day visits surveys, LDA calculations *Tourism spending here does not include any share of overseas fares to UK carriers for London or imputed rent which together are worth an extra 1.2 billion 4 LATI model Wandsworth Borough Report

Chart 1 Overseas visitor spending, % change 4 quarters on preceding 4 quarters 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 London Rest of the UK Source: International Passenger Survey In addition to direct tourism expenditure shown in Table 1, London can be allocated a share of the fares paid by overseas visitors to UK carriers (air, sea and rail companies). For 2006 this share is an estimated 1.1 billion. A further 49 million of income for London is estimated for imputed rent derived from second homes that UK residents use for tourist purposes. Including these extra elements, total tourism income for London in 2006 was 16.4 billion. Domestic overnight tourism Chart 2 shows expenditure by domestic overnight visitors in London and the rest of the UK. The first point of note is that spending in London by domestic overnight visitors accounts for a much smaller share of the UK total (typically 8-10%) than is the case with overseas tourists. From 2000 to 2003 domestic overnight visitor spending remained reasonably steady. Thereafter UKTS data shows a downward trend in domestic overnight tourism in London and the wider UK. In the UK as a whole expenditure declined by more than 20% between 2003 and 2006. London results for 2005 show a particularly sharp fall in expenditure (to 2.1 billion from 2.8 billion in 2004). Comparing 2006 to 2005, spending by domestic overnight visitors rose slightly in London (to 2.3 billion) but it continued to decline across the rest of the country. London was the only region to register an increase in spending in 2006 compared with 2005. There have been concerns in the recent past over UKTS data quality. Prior to 2005 it was suspected that results were affected by a problem with the changing demographic profile of the telephone survey sample. Subsequently the UKTS methodology was changed to faceto-face interviews. But despite issues with the survey methodology, results strongly indicate a trend of declining domestic overnight tourism in both London and the UK over recent years. Chart 2 Domestic overnight visitor spending 30 20 10 0 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 London Rest of the UK Source: UK Tourism Survey LATI model Wandsworth Borough Report 5

Tourism day visits There is a lack of tourism day visitor data available for London. National day visitor surveys have been conducted every two to three years and the latest was the England Leisure Visits Survey (ELVS) in 2005. But this survey did not provide value and volume data for day visits to the London region. The latest London level data available is from the 2002-03 Great Britain Day Visits Survey (GBDVS). In the absence of any official data the LDA estimated London level tourism day visitor value and volume for 2005. The estimates use comparable data from the 2002-03 and 2005 surveys on tourism day visits to English town/city destinations. Further information from other national tourism surveys is also used to account for weaker tourism conditions in London following the terrorist bombings on 7 July 2005. In the absence of 2006 data we take the number of tourism day trips to London as unchanged from the 2005 estimate, and scale up expenditure using RPIX inflation. From the 2005 and 2006 London level estimates indicative borough level estimates can be derived. However, due to the lack of official London day visits data and necessary estimation of 2005 and 2006 values, borough level estimates of day visitor activity should be treated with caution (unlike other estimates from the model). They are intended only to give a best estimate of the scale of day visitor tourism in each borough from the only available data. In addition, the day visitor data do not include business day visits and as such are not directly comparable with official overseas and domestic overnight tourism data. We are taking steps to help ensure that adequate tourism day visitor data will be available for London in the future. An omnibus survey of UK households is being used to provide estimates of day visitor expenditure and volume (including business day visits) for London. These estimates are a short-term solution until national day visitor surveys are able to provide adequate London level data. The LDA is working with the other RDAs and ONS on a longer term goal to ensure that future national day visits surveys provide robust and more frequent London level data and include business day visits. The actual and estimated figures for day visitor expenditure in London and the rest of England are displayed in Chart 3. According to official data from the ELVS, expenditure on tourism day visits across England as a whole increased from 30.8 billion in 2002-03 to 37.4 billion in 2005. LDA estimates indicate that spending in London rose less markedly from 4.7 billion to 5.0 billion in 2005. Chart 3 Tourism day visitor spending 40 30 20 10 0 London 2002-03 2005* 2006* Rest of England Sources: Day visits surveys, LDA calculations * Figures for London are estimates 6 LATI model Wandsworth Borough Report

3. The LATI model: a brief methodological guide This section is intended to give the reader a basic understanding of how the borough level estimates of tourism expenditure are generated using the LATI model. A more detailed description is available in the LATI model methodology report. There have been significant changes to the methodology employed since the publication of the first set of borough level estimates. As such the previously published estimates for 2004 are not comparable with latest results. Revised estimates for 2004, using the new methodology, are shown in this report alongside comparable borough level estimates for 2005 and 2006. Tourists be they international, domestic or day visitors spend money on a vast array of different products and services. However the national tourism surveys provide London level expenditure data split into the following categories: accommodation eating and drinking shopping entertainment other In order to produce borough level estimates, the LATI model uses robust information available to share out London level tourism expenditure in each of these five categories. Expenditures by overseas, domestic and day visitors in each of the categories are summed to provide an estimate of the total tourism expenditure in each borough. Borough level employment data relevant to the accommodation, eating and drinking and shopping categories of tourism expenditure are available from ONS. These employment data are utilised within the model to disaggregate the majority of London level expenditure. In addition, the London Visitor Survey (LVS) 1 and a survey of accommodation providers, run for the LDA by Experian, provide supporting information to help share out tourism expenditure in some of the categories. The data used to disaggregate London level expenditure differs slightly depending on whether the expenditure is by overseas, domestic or day visitors. But as an example shopping expenditure is shared out to borough level using data from ONS on employment in comparison retail stores (stores selling nonfood items not purchased on a regular basis such as clothing, jewellery, recreational goods). A full explanation of how all categories of expenditure are disaggregated as the basis for borough level estimates can be found in an accompanying methodology document. The top-down nature of the LATI model (starting with London data) means it is best suited to disaggregate expenditure. However, tourism trips were also disaggregated for comparative purposes (between boroughs and with trips to London) using the estimated proportions of spending by overseas, domestic and day visitors in the boroughs. LATI model Wandsworth Borough Report 7

4. Tourism in Wandsworth: borough level estimates Presented below are borough level estimates of tourism expenditure. The estimates have been made using the methodology outlined earlier. Table 2 shows tourism estimates for Wandsworth in 2006 (the latest year for which official data is available). Estimates in the table show that Wandsworth received an estimated 283 million of tourism spending in 2006. The largest tourism receipts came from overseas visitors ( 127 million) and day visitors ( 125 million). These two groups together accounted for almost 90% of the borough s tourism expenditure. Domestic staying visitors provided 31 million in 2006 and a lower share of expenditure than in London as a whole. A good measure of the relative importance of tourism to a borough s economy is the proportion of its total employment in tourism related jobs. Chart 4 compares the share of tourism related jobs in Wandsworth with the share in London as a whole, and with the share in a group of boroughs that receive similar amounts of tourism income (according to the 2006 borough spend estimates). 2 Employment data in the chart show that tourism is of greater importance to Wandsworth compared to the ten Tier 4 tourism boroughs which received similar estimates of tourism expenditure for 2006. Tourism in Wandsworth accounts for a slightly lower share of total employment compared with the share in London as a whole. Chart 4 Proportion of tourism related employment in 2006 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Wandsworth Tier 4 boroughs Sources: ABI, DCMS, LDA calculations Greater London The next chart displays estimates of spending by overseas visitors to Wandsworth in 2004, 2005 and 2006. Spending by these visitors remained relatively flat from 2004 to 2005. However, in 2006 spending by international Table 2 The value and volume of tourism for Wandsworth in 2006 Wandsworth Overseas visitors Domestic visitors Day visitors Totals Day visits (3+ hours) - - 3,212 3,212 Overnight visits 252 152-404 Spending ( ) 126,581 31,463 125,263 283,307 All figures in thousands Sources: IPS, UKTS, Day visits surveys, ABI, LDA surveys & calculations 8 LATI model Wandsworth Borough Report

tourists expanded 17% to an estimated 127 million (from 109 million the previous year). Chart 5 Overseas tourism expenditure in Wandsworth ( millions) 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 Sources: IPS, ABI, LDA surveys & calculations Chart 6 shows the estimates of domestic staying visitors expenditure in Wandsworth. Chart 6 Domestic staying tourism expenditure in Wandsworth ( millions) 50 40 30 20 10 0 2004 2005 2006 Sources: UKTS, ABI, LDA surveys & calculations The chart indicates a sharp fall in expenditure by domestic overnight visitors between 2004 and 2005 (from 46 million to 29 million) reflecting lower spending by these visitors in London as a whole. Spending by UK staying visitors then ticked up to 31 million in 2006. Finally, it is of interest to examine changes over time in shares of tourism expenditure in London accounted for by Wandsworth. Chart 7 Shares of total tourism expenditure in Wandsworth over time 15% 12% 9% 6% 3% 0% 2004 2005 2006 % of tier 4 spend (LHS) % of London spend (RHS) 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% Sources: IPS, UKTS, Day visits surveys, ABI, LDA surveys & calculations. The estimates in Chart 7 indicate that over the period 2004 to 2006 Wandsworth marginally expanded its share of total expenditure (by overseas, domestic staying and day visitors) in the tier 4 boroughs that received similar estimates of tourism income. Wandsworth s share of total London expenditure remained steady over this time period. LATI model Wandsworth Borough Report 9

Glossary of terms ABI DCMS ELVS GBDVS IPS LATI LDA LVS ONS RDA UKTS Annual Business Inquiry (source of official employment data) Department for Culture, Media and Sport England Leisure Visits Survey Great Britain Day Visits Survey International Passenger Survey Local Area Tourism Impact (model) London Development Agency London Visitor Survey Office for National Statistics Regional Development Agency United Kingdom Tourism Survey End notes 1 The LVS aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of London as a visitor destination and track visitor satisfaction over time. This is achieved through face to face interviews with both international and domestic visitors in the capital. The survey also collects expenditure information from these visitors. 2 Tourism related employment is counted using ratios estimated by DCMS for the jobs supported by tourism in relevant industries (hotels, restaurants, transportation etc). Fuller details can be found in the LATI model methodology report. 10 LATI model Wandsworth Borough Report