Bus Passenger Survey spring 2015 results Centro - West Midlands PTE area

Similar documents
Tram Passenger Survey

Bus Passenger Survey

Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) All networks

Bus Passenger Survey Autumn 2017 Summary of key results in Wales

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first

National Passenger Survey Autumn putting rail passengers first

National Passenger Survey TOC Report for Chiltern Railways Autumn 2011

National Passenger Survey Autumn putting rail passengers first

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first

National Rail Passenger Survey Autumn 2013 Main Report

West Midlands and Chiltern. Route Utilisation Strategy. Research Findings

National Passenger Survey TOC Report for East Midlands Trains Spring 2011

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX OF SINGAPORE 2017 Q2 RESULTS OVERVIEW AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT

Transport Focus 2016 Bus Passenger Survey Briefing 22 March Liverpool

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

National Rail Passenger Survey Main Report Spring 2018

National Rail Passenger Survey Autumn 2015 Main Report

ISLANDS VISITOR SURVEY

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX OF SINGAPORE 2018 Q2 RESULTS OVERVIEW AIR TRANSPORT AND LAND TRANSPORT

National Passenger Survey PTE Report for West Midlands Autumn 2011

Transport Focus Train punctuality the passenger perspective. 2 March 2017 Anthony Smith, Chief Executive

ISE INDUSTRY FORUM CSISG 2018 Q2 RESULTS Announcement INSTITUTE OF SERVICE EXCELLENCE SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY

ISLANDS VISITOR SURVEY

Railway performance and subsidy statistics

Domestic Tourism to South West Wales in 2006, 2007 and 2008 Factsheet

Methodology and coverage of the survey. Background

National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report. Autumn 2013 (wave 29)

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Timetable Change Research. Re-contact survey key findings

Brighton destination report

77% of visitors to Aberdeen City & Shire spend one or more nights in the area

International Passenger Survey (IPS) Methodology. May 2017

Community Rail Partnership Action Plan The Bishop Line Survey of Rail Users and Non-Users August 2011 Report of Findings

NEWCASTLE VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT. Summary of results OCTOBER Image: Newcastle Marina, courtesy of Newcastle Tourism

Bath destination report

National Station Improvement Programme. Halifax Station - Final report

Rail delays and compensation

Glasgow Queen Street Station Redevelopment research

National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report. Spring 2014 (wave 30)

ISPA 2009 U.S. Spa Compensation Data INTERNATIONAL SPA ASSOCIATION

National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report

Average annual compensation received by full-time spa employees.

National Rail Passenger Survey: User Guidance Report

Wiltshire destination report

National Station Improvement Programme. Uckfield Station Final report

Bournemouth destination report

York destination report

Tourism to the Regions of Wales 2008

Tourism Business Monitor Accommodation Report. Wave 2 Post-Easter holidays

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

Passenger Focus Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Performance CrossCountry. Date: 20 July 2010

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Kent destination report

Network Rail 2014 Customer Survey Report

Cotswolds destination report

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Prepared for: TOMM Committee Kangaroo Island CB Contact: Ben Nitschke, Account Manager Phone: (08)

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results

National Rail Passenger Survey

Aviation Trends Quarter

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Isles of Scilly Online Visitor Survey Final report. Produced for and on behalf of the Islands Partnership. May 2016

Bristol destination report

July 2018 RV PRODUCTION. Overview of towable and motorised recreational vehicles manufactured in Australia. Data Provided by nemaustralasia

Scorecard Key Performance Indicators

CEREDIGION VISITOR SURVEY 2011 TOTAL SAMPLE. November 2011

Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island

Blackpool destination report

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

2015 Metro User Christchurch

PUBLIC OPINION IN KOSOVO BASELINE SURVEY RESULTS NOVEMBER, 2010

Oxford destination report

Inverness, Culloden and Suburbs Settlement Economic Overview

2015 Travel Survey. for the States of Guernsey Commerce & Employment Department RESEARCH REPORT ON Q1 2015

REPORT. VisitEngland Business Confidence Monitor Wave 5 Autumn

transport.gov.scot Borders Railway Year 1 Evaluation

The Essential Report. 25 February MELBOURNE SYDNEY BRISBANE ADELAIDE BRUSSELS

On-Train Provision of Tickets Mystery Shopping Report

Charts & Graphs Methodology INSIGHTS THAT TAKE YOU PLACES

CORNWALL VISITOR FREQUENCY SURVEY

IPSOS / REUTERS POLL DATA Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Travel Decision Survey 2012

Events Tasmania Research Program Hobart Baroque Festival

Heritage Line Community Rail Partnership Darlington to Bishop Auckland Railway Line Survey of Users and Non-Users January to March 2010

Borders Railway: What is the impact two years on?

Scotland Visitor Survey 2015 Extract on Interest in Gaelic Language. Two Year Survey - Year One Results Feb 2016

Report. Passengers' Priorities for Improvements in Rail Services. Report for Passenger Focus. June 2007

Travel Decision Survey Summary Report. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

RECOMMENDING SECTION NEW ZEALAND AS A HOLIDAY DESTINATION SECTION 6/6

Byron Shire Visitor Profile and Satisfaction Report: Summary and Discussion of Results

Competing in a Disrupted and Changing Environment

Customer Satisfaction Tracking Annual Report British Columbia Ferry Services Inc.

Caledonian Sleeper Passenger satisfaction report. Quarter Rail Period 12, 13 and 14

Isles of Scilly Visitor Survey Final report. Produced for and on behalf of the Islands Partnership. May 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Lord Howe Island Visitor Survey 2017

Transcription:

Bus Passenger Survey spring 2015 results Centro - West Midlands PTE area Contact: Murray Leader, Insight Team, Transport Focus Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX Tel: 0300 123 0843 Email: murray.leader@transportfocus.org.uk

Introduction This is a survey of bus passengers' journey experiences. It was carried out between mid-march and mid-may 2015. Number of responses received for West Midlands area-wide sample was 1554. Results are representative at West Midlands authority level. Further detail on method is provided in the final two slides of this presentation. 2

Overall satisfaction 3

Overall satisfaction Fare payers only Free pass 4

Overall satisfaction Age 16-34 Age 35-59 5

Overall satisfaction Commuter Non-commuter 6

Value for money 7

Value for money - by age Age 16-34 Age 35-59 8

Value for money - by journey purpose Commuters Non-commuters 9

Length of time waited 10

Length of time waited - by peak / off-peak Peak (8:00 to 9:30 and 16:00 to 18:00 weekdays only) Off-peak (all times not peak as defined above) 11

Punctuality 12

Checking bus arrival times Whether checked arrival time of the bus: Those who did not check Those who only checked before leaving for the stop Those who only checked at the stop Those who checked before leaving and at the stop Pre-checkers - spring 2015 At stop checkers - spring 2015 Non-checkers - why - spring 2015 13

Punctuality - by peak / off-peak Peak (8:00 to 9:30 and 16:00 to 18:00 weekdays only) Off-peak (all times not peak as defined above) 14

Satisfaction with on-bus journey time 15

What affected journey time - all passengers How often was journey time affected (%) (note more than one answer permissible) 16

What affected journey time - by passenger groups How often was journey time affected (%) (note more than one answer permissible) Peak (8:00 to 9:30 and 16:00 to 18:00 weekdays only) n=277 Off-peak (all times not peak as defined above) n=1277 17

On-bus journey time - fare payers / free pass Fare payers only Free pass 18

On-bus journey time - by time of day of journey Peak (8:00 to 9:30 and 16:00 to 18:00 weekdays only) Off-peak (all times not peak as defined above) 19

On-bus journey time - by age Age 16-34 Age 35-59 20

At the bus stop - part 1 All passengers Age 60+ Female 21

At the bus stop - part 2 All passengers Age 60+ Female 22

As the bus arrived All passengers Fare payers Free pass 23

On the bus - part 1 All passengers Fare payers Free pass 24

On the bus - part 2 All passengers Fare payers Free pass 25

Bus driver - person attributes All passengers Fare payers Free pass 26

Bus driver - driving attributes All passengers Fare payers Free pass 27

Anti-social behaviour - part 1 Incidence of concern/worry (%) Age 16-34 Age 35-59 Age 60+ 28

Anti-social behaviour - part 2 Cause of concern/worry (%) 29

Rating of local services 30

Recommendation 31

Further detail (1) Overview of methodology The survey has been designed to provide results that are representative of bus passenger journeys made within each area, that is at the level of a transport authority or a designated operator area. The sampling method is 'systematic', derived from the list of the area s bus services and the times that they run (sourced from ITO World Ltd which makes available the data used on Traveline). The bus service/start times selected from the sampling process formed the start point for a three-hour shift, during which field workers made as many return trips as possible on that selected service. They discussed the survey with the boarders of that bus service and gave all passengers the chance to participate; those wishing to do so were given a self-completion questionnaire to complete after their journey, together with a reply-paid envelope. Fieldwork was conducted between mid-march and mid-may 2015 (excluding the Easter holiday period). Services available for selection were those running between 6am to 10pm, seven days of the week; only school bus services were systematically excluded. The survey was conducted among passengers aged 16 or over. The response data were weighted in two stages. The first stage was to weight to the age and gender profile of bus passengers within each area; as there is no available data at area level on the age/gender profile of passengers this was estimated by recording the profile of passengers on two occasions during each fieldwork shift. The second stage of weighting was at area level to ensure that in the final data each participating area (within the survey) was represented in proportion to its total annual journey volumes. Transport Focus was supported by BDRC Continental Ltd in conducting the spring 2015 survey. 32

Further detail (2) Interpreting results Throughout the report, behavioural results are based on all survey respondents, and passengers opinion ratings are based on those respondents that gave an opinion. All results are based on weighted values. In the report where numbers in brackets shown after the question/category text are the actual numbers of passenger responses generating the answer value shown. For ease of use BPS data are reported rounded to whole numbers, that is without decimal places. Note: all satisfied results are the sum of the very satisfied and fairly satisfied and calculated on the underlying values which include decimal places. As a consequence these true summations can appear up to one per cent different to the sum of the individual rounded very satisfied and fairly satisfied numbers. Percentages quoted at 'grouped area' level that is: PTEs; Unitary authorities; or Two-Tier authorities, are the aggregate scores achieved across all the areas surveyed in that group. Each individual area counts towards the area group aggregate score in proportion to the number of passenger journeys made annually in that area. Waiver Transport Focus has taken care to ensure that the information contained in the BPS is correct. However, no warranty, express or implied, is given as to its accuracy and Transport Focus does not accept any liability for error or omission. Transport Focus is not responsible for how the information is used, how it is interpreted or what reliance is placed on it. Transport Focus does not guarantee that the information contained in BPS is fit for any particular purpose. 33