Navigating Uncertainty: The Perception of Risk in Cruise Tourists' Decision-Making

University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Travel and Tourism Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally 2017 ttra International Conference Navigating Uncertainty: The Perception of Risk in Cruise Tourists' Decision-Making jenni holland Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ttra holland, jenni, "Navigating Uncertainty: The Perception of Risk in Cruise Tourists' Decision-Making" (2017). Travel and Tourism Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally. 11. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ttra/2017/grad_student_workshop/11 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Travel and Tourism Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact scholarworks@library.umass.edu.

Navigating Uncertainty: The Perception of Risk in Cruise Tourists' Decision- Making Introduction This presentation will discuss a PhD research study currently in the middle stages. The aim of the research is to examine the influence that perceptions of risk have on consumer decision-making in ocean cruising using a qualitative research deisgn. Literature Review There is a culture of fear in western societies that is distinct to the 21st century. Although statistically humans are living longer, safer and healthier lives, many people are more concerned about risk than in previous generations (Nakayachi, 2013; Slovic, 2000). Social understanding of risk has become increasingly prominent in the last two decades, reflecting a growing concern with societal and global uncertainty (Gardner, 2008; Korstanje, 2011; Lupton, 1999). Scholars argue that there is a culture of fear that is distinct to western societies (Furedi, 1997; Glassner, 1999; Tudor, 2003; Zinn, 2008). Although statistically humans are living longer, safer and healthier lives; certain scholars argue many people are more concerned about risk than in previous generations (Fischhoff et al, 2001; Nakayachi, 2013; Slovic, 2000). There is a narrative of fear (Furedi, 2007); fuelled by media content that often makes the world seem more threatening and dangerous than it actually is and thus influences perception and attitudes towards risk (Ropeik, 2004; Wilkinson & Fletcher, 1995). Understanding how tourists feel about risk is of utmost importance because the presence of risk, whether real or perceived, has the potential to change travel decision-making (Bowen et al, 2014; Sonmez & Graefe, 1998). However, risk is not well understood in travel and the lack of research points to a knowledge gap in understanding the relationship between risk and consumer decision-making in tourism. As risk and uncertainty are inherent to tourism, understanding tourist risk perception is central to the decision making process. There have been many attempts to define, conceptualize and understand the phenomenon of risk. However, defining risk is problematic and there is no universally-agreed upon definition (Aven & Renn, 2009). Risk goes beyond physical harm and includes financial, psychological, social, time-loss, and performance risks (Jacoby & Kaplan, 1972). However, risk is not well understood in tourism and the lack of research points to a knowledge gap in understanding the relationship of risk and consumer decision-making in tourism, and particularly in cruise studies. A cruise holiday is particularly germane for examining conceptualizations of risk due to the complex decision-making involved (Petrick et al, 2007) and complementarity nature of the consumption experience (Gibson, 2006).

Cruise tourism is one of the fastest growing sectors of the global tourism industry (Hunter et al, 2015; Jones, 2011; Papathanassis & Beckmann, 2011; Sun et al, 2011; Weeden et al 2011). While the cruise industry has enjoyed sustained growth for the past decade, there has been increased attention recently on possible risks related to cruising (Baker, 2013; Bowen, Fidegon & Page, 2014; Lois et al, 2004; Wang et al, 2014). Recent events illuminate risk in cruising, including the sinking of the Costa Concordia with 32 deaths (Alexander, 2012), and multiple outbreaks of norovirus onboard cruise ships (Wikswo et al, 2011), resulting in cancelled sailings, limited passenger services and widespread illness onboard. The conceptualization of risk in the decision-making process for ocean cruising has been limited to a narrow application of risk related to terrorism (Bowen et al, 2014; Brosnan, 2011), safety (Baker, 2013; Lois et al, 2004), dangers of polar cruising (Luck et al, 2010; Stewart et al, 2007; Stewart & Draper, 2008) and health outbreaks such as H1N1 and norovirus (Liu et al, 2016). However, little is known about whether risk influences tourist decision-making for a cruise holiday. This research will apply the consumer risk typology set out by Jacoby and Kaplan (1972) to decision-making for a cruise holiday. This typology is widely recognized and used for consumer decision-making, yet limitations exist for application to experiential tourism products such as a cruise. Methodology The research is conducted through a constructivist lens, which accepts that knowledge is socially constructed and there are multiple interpretations and realities (Schwandt, 2015). Reflexivity and positionality are woven through the research to give a voice to the researcher s own experiences and relationship with cruising. Data was collected in the UK in 2016 using focus groups. Image elicitation was used to explore thoughts and feelings regarding perceptions of risk in a cruise holiday, including both researcher-elicited and participant-elicited images. Further data collection will occur in 2017 using an adapted form of the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (Zaltman, 1996) in personal interviews to further explore the conceptualization of risk in cruise holidays. Results Preliminary findings indicate that the perception of risk in cruising differs between participants who have cruised and participants who have not cruised. Consumer risk as noted by Jacoby and Kaplan (1972) was found to be a concern for the non-cruising group. However the cruising group had very little concern with consumer risk for a cruise holiday. Data collection and analysis is ongoing through 2017. Conclusion and Discussion

Understanding the influence of risk on the decision-making process will help marketers and the tourism industry to better understand the consumer and the consumer decision-making process. This research will provide deeper understanding of consumer risk in tourism products that are experiential and complementarity such as a cruise holiday. References Alexander, D. E. (2012). The 'Titanic Syndrome': risk and crisis management on the Costa Concordia. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 9(1), pp. 1547-5375. Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009) On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain, Journal of Risk Research, vol. 12, no.1, pp. 1-11. Baker, D. (2013). Cruise passengers perceptions of safety and security while cruising the Western Caribbean. ROSA DOS VENTOS-Turismo e Hospitalidade, 5(1), pp. 140-154. Bowen, C., Fidgeon, P., & Page, S. J. (2014). Maritime tourism and terrorism: Customer perceptions of the potential terrorist threat to cruise shipping. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(7), pp. 610-639. Brosnan, I. G., Leschine, T. M., & Miles, E. L. (2011). Cooperation or conflict in a changing Arctic? Ocean Development & International Law, 42(1-2), pp. 173-210. Furedi, F. (1997). Population and development: a critical introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press Gardner, D. (2008). Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear. London, UK: Virgin Books. Gibson, P. (2006). Cruise operations management. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Glassner, B. (1999). The culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York, NY: Basic Books. Hunter, E., Martin, A., & Nash, R. (2015). Scottish cruise tourism, the strategic development of the sector and the factors effecting future growth. In A. Tavidze (Ed.), Progress in Economics Research. Volume 31 (pp. 67-89). New York: Nova Science Publishers. Jacoby, J. & Kaplan, L. (1972) The components of perceived risk, Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 3, pp. 382-383.

Jones, R. (2011). Motivations to cruise: an itinerary and cruise experience study. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 18, pp. 30-40. Korstanje, M. E. (2011). Why risk why now? Conceptual problems around the risk perception in tourism industry. Revisita Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, 5(1), pp. 4-22. Liu, B., Pennington-Gray, L., & Krieger, J. (2016). Tourism crisis management: Can the Extended Parallel Process Model be used to understand crisis responses in the cruise industry?. Tourism Management, 55, 310-321. Lois, P., Wang, J., Wall, A., & Ruxton, T. (2004). Formal safety assessment of cruise ships. Tourism Management, 25(1), pp. 93-109. Lück, M., Maher, P. T., & Stewart, E. J. (Eds.) (2010). Cruise tourism in Polar Regions: Promoting environmental and social sustainability? London: Earthscan Ltd. Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London, UK: Routledge. Nakayachi, K. (2013) The unintended effects of risk refuting information on anxiety, Risk Analysis, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 80-91. Papathanassis, A., & Beckmann, I. (2011). Assessing the poverty of cruise theory hypothesis. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), pp. 153-174. Petrick, J. F., Li, X., & Park, S. Y. (2007). Cruise passengers' decision-making processes. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 23(1), pp. 1-14. Ropeik, D. (2004). The consequences of fear. EMBO Reports, 5(1), pp 56-60. Schwandt, T. A. (2015). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Sönmez, S. F. & Graefe, A. R. (1998). Determining future travel behavior from past travel experience and perceptions of risk and safety. Journal of Travel Research, 37, pp. 171-177. Slovic, P. (2000) The perception of risk, New York: Taylor & Francis. Stewart, E. J., Howell, S. E., Draper, D., Yackel, J., & Tivy, A. (2007). Sea ice in Canada's Arctic: Implications for cruise tourism. Arctic, 60(4), pp. 370-380. Stewart, E. J., & Draper, D. (2008). The sinking of the MS Explorer: implications for cruise tourism in Arctic Canada. Arctic, 61(2), 224.

Sun, X., Jiao, Y., & Tian, P. (2011). Marketing research and revenue optimization for the cruise industry: A concise review. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(3), pp. 746-755. Tudor, A. (2003). A (macro) sociology of fear? The Sociological Review, 51(2), pp. 238-256. Wang, Y., Jung, K. A., Yeo, G. T., & Chou, C. C. (2014). Selecting a cruise port of call location using the fuzzy-ahp method: A case study in East Asia. Tourism Management, 42, pp. 262-270. Weeden, C., Lester, J.-A., & Thyne, M. (2011). Cruise tourism: Emerging issues and implications for a maturing industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 18(01), pp. 26-29. Wikswo, M. E., Cortes, J., Hall, A. J., Vaughan, G., Howard, C., Gregoricus, N., & Cramer, E. H. (2011). Disease transmission and passenger behaviors during a high morbidity Norovirus outbreak on a cruise ship, January 2009. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 52(9), pp. 1116-1122. Wilkinson, J. S., & Fletcher, J. E. (1995). Bloody news and vulnerable populations: an ethical question. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 10(3), 167-177. Williams, A. M. & Baláž, V. (2015) Tourism risk and uncertainty theoretical reflections, Journal of Travel Research, vol. 54, pp. 271-287. Zaltman, G. (1996). Metaphorically speaking. Marketing Research, 8(2), pp. 13-20. Zinn, J. (Ed.). (2008). Social theories of risk and uncertainty: An introduction (pp. 18-49). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.