Predictive Economic Impact Study for the Mount Dora to Seminole Wekiva Trail

Similar documents
PREDICTIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE WEKIVA TRAIL IN DOWNTOWN MT DORA

Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State

Estimating Tourism Expenditures for the Burlington Waterfront Path and the Island Line Trail

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County. July 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, June 2018

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. hospitality compensation as a share of total compensation at. Page 1

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

Airport Profile. St. Pete Clearwater International BY THE NUMBERS 818, ,754 $ Enplanements. Passengers. Average Fare. U.S.

The Impact of Trails on Communities. Jim Wood Chief, Office of Greenways & Trails Division of Recreation and Parks

The Travel & Tourism Industry in Vermont

Dr. John M. DeGrove Community Steward Webinar Series

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas Analysis

INTERNATIONAL DRIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Luis Nieves-Ruiz, AICP Economic Development Program Manager March 29, 2017

ECONOMIC PROFILE. Tourism

The Economic Impact of Tourism in: Dane County & Madison, Wisconsin. April 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

Leasing Brochure. Park Plaza Shopping Center 1150 N. Federal Highway, Pompano Beach, Florida Under Construction - Coming Very Soon

2014 NOVEMBER ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND VISITOR PROFILE. Prepared By:

GOLDEN GATE POINT OPPORTUNITY

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013

Economic Impact of Kalamazoo-Battle Creek International Airport

Overview of the Southern Nevada Convention and Meeting Segment

MONTEREY COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACTS P

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

Impacts of Visitor Spending on the Local Economy: George Washington Birthplace National Monument, 2004

2016 VISITOR STATISTICS WASHINGTON, DC

Richard V. Butler, Ph.D. and Mary E. Stefl, Ph.D., Trinity University HIGHLIGHTS

The Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Southeast Asia Region in Prepared for: CLIA SE Asia. September 2015

Washington, DC 2013 Visitor Statistics

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

Airport Profile Orlando-Sanford International Airport

The Economic Impact of Children's Camps in Michigan

Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

DOWNTOWN HISTORIC HOMESTEAD RETAIL PROPERTY ON WASHINGTON AVE

Report on Palm Beach County Tourism Fiscal Year 2007/2008 (October 2007 September 2008)

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

The Economic Impact of Travel in Minnesota Analysis

The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the Renovation, Expansion, and Annual Operation of the Balsams Grand Resort and Wilderness Ski Area

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE & CONTACTS DEMOGRAPHICS TRAVEL BEHAVIOR CHARACTERISTICS MODAL STATISTICS TOURISM TRANSPORTATION FINANCING

The Economic Impact of Travel in Kansas. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

ESTIMATION OF ECONOMIC IMPACTS FOR AIRPORTS IN HAWTHORNE, EUREKA, AND ELY, NEVADA

Westlake Economic Impacts. Palm Beach County Florida

TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary. Convention Industry Overview and Trends. Convention Market Competitive and Comparable Analysis

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2014

2017 VISITOR STATISTICS WASHINGTON, DC

Economic Impact of Aviation in Arizona

Trail Use in the N.C. Museum of Art Park:

The Economic Contributions of Agritourism in New Jersey

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2016

Economic Impact Analysis. Tourism on Tasmania s King Island

The Economic Impact of the 2015 ASICS Los Angeles Marathon. September 2015

Hillsborough County Florida Hillsborough County s Trailways Addressing Program

Visitor Profile - Central Island Region

CHAPTER ONE LITERATURE REVIEW

Resolution of Support for the Ettrick Site as the Future Location of the Tri-Cities Multimodal Station

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2017

Philadelphia Casino Application Review September 24, 2013 AKRF.COM

MEMORANDUM MARKET OVERVIEW. Matt Roberts, Director of Parks and Recreation City of Carpinteria. Kevin Engstrom James Rabe. Date: June 21, 2016

EXHIBIT 1. BOARD AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OF A JOINT DEVELOPMENT SOLICITATION

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2018

September 2016 Visitor Profile

I I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. A. Introduction

Evaluating Lodging Opportunities

Airport Profile Pensacola International

AGENDA GUEMES ISLAND FERRY OPERATIONS PUBLIC FORUM

Overseas Visitation Estimates for U.S. States, Cities, and Census Regions: 2015

Business Growth (as of mid 2002)

PDAC Priority Project East Dayton Rails-to-Trails (Flight Line) Project Description

Fort McMurray International Airport

Occupancy in North Carolina

Puerto Ricans in Rhode Island, the United States, and Puerto Rico, 2013

FLORIDA, TAMPA MSA, AND BRANDON OVERVIEW

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM. Raleigh, North Carolina

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

Temecula Valley Travel Impacts

TOURISM AS AN ECONOMIC ENGINE FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2010

Economic Impacts of University of North Carolina Asheville Athletics. Conducted by

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

The Economic Base of Colfax County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

DOWNTOWN SAN JOSÉ AIRSPACE & DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY STUDY (PROJECT CAKE) STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING #7. Draft. November 13, 2018

THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSOR

Industrial Market Report

TRENDS IN THE HOTEL Edition

SLOW GROWTH OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ECONOMY

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

AIRPORT FUND. Description. Summary

JR East: International and Domestic Perspectives

March 2011 Visitor Profile

MARKET OUTLOOK. 01 Walkability & Accessibility 02 Infrastructure & Employment 03 Demographics 04 Residential Analysis 06 Rental Analysis

Get Smart Market Insights from Our Research Team Customer Conference

Tourism Satellite Account: Demand-Supply Reconciliation

THE SHOPS & RESIDENCES AT SAN GABRIEL NRT

Fourth Quarter 2013 Visitor Profile (October December) Amelia Island Tourist Development Council

Puerto Ricans in Ohio, the United States, and Puerto Rico, 2014

Transcription:

Predictive Economic Impact Study for the Mount Dora to Seminole Wekiva Trail Prepared By: Valerie Seidel vseidel@balmoralgroup.us 341 N. Maitland Ave., Suite 100 Maitland, FL 32751 Phone (407) 629-2185 Fax: (407) 629-2183 Commissioned By: The Florida Greenways and Trails Foundation Funded by: The City of Mount Dora The Lake County Board of County Commissioners The Lake-Sumter Metropolitan Planning Organization The Florida Greenways and Trails Foundation 1

Objective The objective of this report is to estimate the economic impacts that could reasonably be expected to accrue to the City of Mount Dora, Florida, as a result of a trail running through downtown Mount Dora, connecting to the proposed Wekiva Parkway Trail, the Seminole Wekiva Trail and eventually the West Orange Trail. Two trails were chosen as comparable benchmarks for this study: the Dunedin portion of the Pinellas Trail and the Winter Garden trail in Orange County, Florida. The East Central Florida Planning Council was gracious enough to provide survey data from their analysis of Orange County Trails, in support of these efforts. 1

Projected Economic Contribution of Downtown Mount Dora Trail Executive Summary Over the last three decades the State of Florida and the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) have been funding trail projects throughout Florida. There is a growing body research throughout Florida and the rest of the U.S. elucidating the beneficial impacts relative to investment in these projects. While access to natural lands, health and fitness, and alternative transportation options are extremely important; one of the significant and important aspects of trails has been the positive economic impacts they afford local communities. This analysis provides the estimated economic contribution of the downtown segment of the proposed Mount Dora Trail. The proposed trail is planned to run through downtown Mount Dora, connecting to the proposed Wekiva Parkway Trail, the Seminole Wekiva Trail and eventually the West Orange Trail. The downtown trail, with its connectivity to existing trails and addition of increased bicyclist traffic, will represent a significant enhancement to the existing Lake County Trail System. The Balmoral Group was retained by the Florida Greenways and Trails Foundation to estimate the economic contribution for the downtown segment only, based on data obtained by the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council in its recent analysis of three Orange County trails, information from Dunedin, FL (a Pinellas Trail Community) and other publications. Estimated economic benefits include: $3 to $12.7 million total benefits for businesses and workers along the downtown trail segment, including $1.9 to $8 million of retail spending is anticipated to be spent at food and beverage vendors, and restaurants on the trail; and $1.1 to $1.6 million in spending annually on other retail goods and services along the trail; and 75 to 153 jobs supported by spending on the downtown trail segment. Fiscal benefits attributable to the estimated property value impacts from projected retail spending and the total benefits include: The estimates of up to $12 million in local spending benefits may be considered a lower bound - nonrecreational visits may generate additional spending from the trail visitor who returns later for a dinner or outing with friends, which is not counted in direct spending benefits. $4.8 to $6.35 million increase to property values along the downtown trail segment; $24 to $32 thousand in annual Ad Valorem revenue to the City of Mount Dora; $23 to $30 thousand in annual Ad Valorem revenue to Lake County Government; $36 to $48 thousand in annual Ad Valorem revenue to Lake County Schools; and $676.9 to $889 thousand in annual Sales Tax revenue. This study used GIS and econometric analysis to estimate the number of downtown trail users, calculate total annual trail use, estimate retail spending per trip, and identify the economic and fiscal contributions to the City of Mount Dora, Lake County, and Florida. The analysis relied on 2

Survey data reported in Economic Impact Analysis of Orange County Trails, which was provided by the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council; Pre- and post- trail information from the City of Dunedin, Florida; and National and State trail reports. Based on behavioral and spending information obtained from the ECFRPC s survey of Orange County Trail users, approximately 57,140 people can expected to use the downtown Mount Dora trails at least one time each calendar year. In total, it is estimated that 448,275 trips would be made on the trails. These trail users are expected to travel an average of 22 miles each trip and spend $21.57. Spending would be expected to total more than $9.6 million each year. Trail User Spending (Millions of Current Dollars) Restaurants $ 5.622 Food and Beverage $ 2.407 Rental Fees $ 1.031 Guide Maps/books $ 0.271 Other Spending $ 0.339 Total $ 9.670 Trail user spending in downtown Mount Dora would support between 75 and 153 jobs, $2-3 million in personal income, and $3-13 million in additional local economic output. Ranges are provided due to the variation in assumptions that can be applied to the original survey data, as described in more detail in the following pages. Total Economic Support Employment 75 153 Jobs Personal Income 1 $ 1.90 2.97 Million Total Income 2 $ 3.08 12.7 Million 1 Total wages and income received by workers along the trail. 2 The total value of all goods and services, including personal income. 3

Methodology and Analysis The Balmoral Group (TBG) conducted the analysis of economic impact in three steps: 1. Trip demand estimation; 2. Retail demand estimation; and 3. Economic impact quantification. A non-technical discussion of the methodology used in each of these steps follows. Trip Demand Trip demand was estimated using a two-step process: 1. Estimate the regional population of trail users; 2. Estimate the user-trips to downtown Mount Dora and Regional Trail Users Estimates of the regional user population are based on review of national, state, and local trail reports. ECFRPC (2011) indicates that Orange County trails are visited by 1.7 million people each year. Comparing Orange County trail use with trips per user, it is estimated that there were approximately 159,563 persons in the region who have used Orange County trails within the past year. These users represent approximately 7.5% of the population of the Orlando Metropolitan Statistical Area s (MSA) 2010 population (Census 2010). Trail use in Orange County is comparable to reported trail use in the City of Dunedin, Florida. According to the Dunedin s Director of Community Redevelopment, approximately 156,000 people travel through downtown Dunedin on the Pinellas Trail (Harnik 1997 p. 177). Comparing Dunedin trail users to the 1990 and 2000 population of the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater MSA (Census 1990, 2000), suggests between 7.5% and 6.5% of the regional population uses the Dunedin trail. Librett, Yore, and Schmidt (2006) report a survey national survey of trail use and physical activity levels. Their analysis found evidence that 11.2% of women and 14.3% of men use a walking, hiking, or biking trail at least once per month. Together, the previously identified trail user surveys bound the estimate of Central Florida trail users between 12.5% and 7.5% of the populations. The Mount Dora trail would represent a new option among choices a trail user could make. The ECFRPC (2011) survey results indicate the distances which trail users currently travel to use the three existing trails studied. Given the heavy overlap in population within the distance gradient, a reasonable estimate is that one-fourth to one-third of trail users may choose to utilize the Mount Dora trail for any given trip. To be conservative, a value of 4% was used to estimate regional trail users. 4

Trail-User Trips Trail-user trips were estimated using reported visitation rates in the ECFRPC (2011) study. To facilitate the forecast, a GIS and econometric model was developed that predicted trail-visits per user based on trail attributes and the distance (in five mile increments) between the trail and the zip code the in which the respondents resides. The demographics of the population expected to use the Mount Dora Trail closely resemble those of the three Orange County trails. As such, the results of the survey analysis were combined with 2010 Census counts of local populations in Lake County, Orange County, and Seminole County to predict trips per user to the downtown Mount Dora trail. Summary of predicted trail users and user-trips by distance from downtown Mount Dora are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Predicted Annual Trail users and User-Trips by Distance Traveled 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 Population 28,513 96,525 92,066 336,905 376,612 338,537 159,366 Trail users 1,141 3,861 3,683 13,476 15,064 13,541 6,375 User-trips 14,209 42,493 36,514 117,899 114,217 87,828 35,116 Economic Contribution User-trips were combined with reported spending habits by distance traveled to obtain estimates of retail sales and the economic contribution of the downtown Mount Dora trail. To estimate spending, TBG stratified spending habits reported in ECFRPC (2011) by the distance traveled by survey respondents. A series of spending multipliers for restaurant, food and beverage, equipment rentals, and books and maps were then applied to the user-trips reported in Table 1. Total spending by distance traveled is reported in Table 2. Table 2. Retail Spending by Distance Traveled (Millions of Current Dollars) 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 Restaurant $0.062 $0.393 $0.365 $1.179 $1.428 $2.196 Food & Bev. $0.056 $0.324 $0.313 $0.589 $0.685 $0.439 Rentals $0.014 $0.073 $0.000 $0.943 $0.000 $0.000 Books & Maps $0.003 $0.040 $0.000 $0.000 $0.228 $0.000 Other Spending $0.033 $0.269 $0.037 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Total $0.168 $1.099 $0.715 $2.712 $2.341 $2.635 The total economic contribution the downtown Mount Dora trail can be expected to impart on the City of Mount Dora was estimated. These figures were estimated based on a set of multipliers developed using reported spending and economic impacts reported in ECFRPC (2011). According to ECFRPC (2011) every $1 million in retail spending supported about 15.85 jobs, $307 thousand in personal income, and an additional $309 thousand in economic output. For a lower bound estimate, direct personal income was calculated based on the average retail wage of $25,440 for Lake County applied to downtown Winter Garden employment estimates from ECFRPC (2011). Multipliers were then applied to estimate total economic output. 5

Other Studies Studies conducted throughout Florida and the United States have found that trails generally have a positive economic impact on surrounding properties: In Winter Garden, FL, before the West Orange Trail, the downtown area was considered blighted. Since completion of the trail, downtown Winter Garden is revitalized and is now nearly 100% storefront occupied. In Dunedin, FL, before the Pinellas Trail developed, downtown occupancy was 35%. Since trail arrival in the early 1990s, the downtown occupancy has been nearly 100%. A recent (2008) study in Ohio suggests that house prices increase by $7.05 for every foot closer a property is located to a trail. The gradient map to the right shows how similar property value increases might affect a sample of Potential Trail Values to Neighboring properties along Gardenia Trail (Phase II) proposed Parcels Downtown Fruitland Park for downtown Fruitland Park. A study of 372 rails to trails projects found that converting an abandoned rail corridor to a trail reduces crime by cleaning up the landscape and attracting people who use the trail for recreation and transportation. In the Denver metro area, 73 percent of surveyed real estate agents believed a home near a trail was easier to sell. In Massachusetts, a study of seven towns through which the Minuteman Bikeway and Nashua River Rail Trail run found that homes near these rail trails sold in an average of 29.3 days as compared to 50.4 days for other homes; homes near rail trails sold at 99.3% of the list price as compared to 98.1% of the list price for other homes sold in these towns In North Carolina, a study of the bicycle facilities along the Northern Outer Banks found that approximately $9 was generated for every $1 investment in bicycle facilities. 6

References East Central Florida Regional Planning Council. 2011. Economic Impact Analysis of Orange County Trails. The Florida Greenways and Trails Council. 2010. A Resolution of the Florida Greenways and Trails Council Recognizing the Economic Value of Trails and Greenways to Florida. Available at http://www.dep.state.fl.us/gwt/pdf/resolution _economic _value.pdf. Harnik, Peter. 1997. Pinellas Trail: Pinellas County, Florida. In Urban parks and Open Spaces, ed. Alexander Garvin and Gayle Berens. Washington D.C.: Urban Land Institute. Librett, John L., Michelle M. Yore, and Thomas L. Schmidt. 2006. Characteristics of Physical Activity Levels Among Trail Users in a U.S. National Sample. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 31 (5): 399-405. Lawrie, Judson, John Guenther, Thomas Cook, Mary P. Meletiou, and Sarah W. O Brien. 2004. The Economic Impact of Investments in Bicycle Facilities: A Case Study of the Northern Outer Banks. http://www.ncdot.gov/bikeped/download/bikeped_research_eiafulltechreport.pdf U.S. Census Bureau. Census 1990 Summary File 1 (Sf1) 100 Percent data, Table P0011: Persons. Available at factfinder.census.gov. U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (Sf1) 100 Percent data, Table P1: Total Population. Available at factfinder.census.gov. U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (Sf1) 100 Percent data, Table DP-1: Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 2010. Available at factfinder.census.gov. Wood, Jim. 2009. National and State Trail Trends: Meeting Public Demand and Transforming Communities. 7