Chapter 1 General Information

Similar documents
Standard Operating Procedures

vzny ARTCC & vzbw ARTCC

Cape Area Airports Standard Operating Procedures

Burlington ATCT Standard Operating Procedures

RELEASE RECORD. Version Date Author Notes Dec 2006 SK Initial Release

11/21/2008 ZDC-ZTL LOA Version 1. Letter of Agreement

Letter of Agreement by and between Jacksonville ARTCC and Miami ARTCC

BOSTON ARTCC (vzbw) TRAINING SYLLABUS LEVEL: Center Controller (C1)

- Updated formatting - Re-drawn airspace delegation diagram

VATUSA-VATNZ-VATPAC OCEANIC PARTNERSHIP OAKLAND OCEANIC FSS GENERAL SOP 1 OCT 2012

ERIE ATCT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Federal Aviation Administration Operations in the New York Center Oceanic CTA/FIR

VIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA REGION - USA DIVISION vzkc KANSAS CITY ARTCC

Albany ATCT Standard Operating Procedures

LETTER OF AGREEMENT 1. PURPOSE: 2. Cancellation: 3. vzdc Responsibilities, Arrivals: CAE MYR: FLO: CLT: 4. vzjx Responsibilities, Arrivals: RDU: FAY

Standard Operating Procedures

Letter of Agreement between Indianapolis & Washington Air Route Traffic Centers

Cleveland ARTCC and Boston Virtual ARTCC Letter of Agreement

ATLANTA ARTC CENTER AND CHARLOTTE TOWER LETTER OF AGREEMENT

Providence ATCT Standard Operating Procedures

Letter of Agreement. Between Jacksonville ARTCC and Virtual United States Navy Effective Date: Sept 1, 2008

ZTL ARTCC / CLT ATCT LETTER OF AGREEMENT. EFFECTIVE: July 10, SUBJECT: APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

THE AREA CONTROL CENTRE (CTR) POSITION

LETTER OF AGREEMENT. Between

ZTL ARTCC. Asheville Regional. Air Traffic Control Tower. Standard Operating Procedures AVL B. Effective: May 1, 2011

Jacksonville ARTCC. F11 TRACON Standard Operating Procedures

Letter of Agreement (LOA)

GNSS/RNAV Non- Radar Longitudinal Separation in the Caribbean

GENERAL OPERATING PROCEDURES FINLAND(GOP)

International Virtual Aviation Organisation. Letter of Agreement. between. and. Effective: 15/05/2017 Edition: 1

The Anatomy of Delays:

BOSTON ARTCC (vzbw) STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE KALB) ALBANY APPROACH (ALB

San Juan CERAP. Standard Operation Procedures. Version 2.2 May 5th, Welcome to San Juan CERAP (ZSU ARTCC, TJZS FIR)

ZTL ARTCC. Augusta Regional

COM Failure - Piarco ACC

Pilot Briefing Document Cross The Pond 2013 Heathrow Airport EGLL/LHR

Eastern Caribbean PIARCO Virtual FIR. PIARCO Control Zone (CTR)

AIP PORTUGAL ENR NOV-2007

AIP PORTUGAL ENR JAN-2012

FLIGHT TEST & SAFETY CONSULTANTS, LLC FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW (FRR)

JACKSONVILLE CENTER AND SAVANNAH TRACON. LETTER OF AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE: December 22, 2006

Denver ARTCC Colorado Springs ATCT & TRACON STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Piedmont Triad International Airport

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for UAE Centre (OMAE)

Greenville Spartanburg International

New York ARTCC (ZNY) & Potomac TRACON (PCT)

FLIGHT STRIP MANAGEMENT - APPROACH LEVEL

RALEIGH-DURHAM ATCT/TRACON STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

AIRSPACE STRUCTURE. In aeronautics, airspaces are the portion of the atmosphere controlled by a country above its territory.

HOUSTON AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER VATSIM United States Division. Letter of Agreement. Revised: July 25, 2004 Effective: July 25, 2004

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN DENMARK FIR AND SWEDEN FIR. VATSIM Scandinavia 4 April 2013

Boston Consolidated TRACON (A90) Standard Operating Procedures

Version O January 21, 2019

1.2 An Approach Control Unit Shall Provide the following services: c) Alerting Service and assistance to organizations involved in SAR Actions;

VATSIM LOS ANGELES ARTCC STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Arabian Control (OGCC)

IVAO Flight Operations Department Indonesia (ID) Division Procedures

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN POLISH VACC AND SWEDEN FIR

Holland-America Line Pilot Briefing. December 14, bvartcc.com

c) Advisory service to IFR flights operating within advisory airspace.

VATUSA Approval 3/21/18

AIP ENR JORDAN 12 DEC 2013 RADAR SERVICES AND PROCEDURES

AIRAC AIP SUPPLEMENT A 16/17 08 June 2017

Standard Operating Procedures

International Airlines Safety Concerns in the Caribbean region.

Pilot ATC RT Phraseology

Jordan Airspace Manual. Prepared by: Aboud Horani & Mahmoud Odeh XM-AOC / XM-ADIR

Denmark FIR and Sweden FIR

LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN BODØ FIR AND MURMANSK FIR

VIRTUAL UNITED STATES NAVY (VUSN) AND MIAMI CENTER (ZMA) LETTER OF AGREEMENT Effective: 06 JAN 2004

ATMM. Air Traffic Management Manual. Air Traffic Management Manual VACC AUSTRIA LOVV ATMM Air Traffic Management Manual

Operating Procedures. For the Provision of Air Traffic Control Services. RAF Mount Pleasant EGYP. Falklands Islands. RAF Monte Agradable EGYP

Oceanic Control Policies Rev /2012. Air Traffic Control

8th USA/Europe. Paper #141: Lateral Intent Error s Impact on Aircraft Prediction. Federal Aviation Administration ATM R&D Seminar

International Virtual Aviation Organisation. Letter of Agreement. between. and. Effective: 15/05/2017 Edition: 2

SECTION 4 - APPROACH CONTROL PROCEDURES

Standard Operating Procedures Atlanta Intl Airport (ATL) Air Traffic Control

WEST ATLANTIC ROUTE SYSTEM (WATRS) PLUS AIRSPACE REDESIGN AND SEPARATION REDUCTION INITIATIVE. (Presented by United States of America) SUMMARY

VATUSA PHOENIX TRACON and VATUSA PHOENIX ATCT LETTER OF AGREEMENT. SUBJECT: Interfacility Coordination Procedures

ATC Training Syllabus Philippines vacc Version 1.1 September 25, 2016

FLIGHT ADVISORY WASHINGTON D.C. SPECIAL FLIGHT RULES AREA LEESBURG MANUVERING AREA

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TRACON STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES VIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK LOS ANGELES ARTCC

VATSIM MINNEAPOLIS ARTCC MINNEAPOLIS TRACON LETTER OF AGREEMENT

ZDC ORDER G ZDC ARTCC ORDER TRAINING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

2 Purpose and Need. 2.1 The Need for the CLT OAPM Project Description of the Problem

Object: LoA between the Barcelona FIR (LECB) and the Bordeaux FIR (LFBB)

Letter of Agreement. between

Chapter 6. Nonradar. Section 1. General DISTANCE

Surveillance and. Overview. Federal Aviation Administration Broadcast Services. Presented to: ADS-B Technology Forum. By: Andy Leone, FAA, SBS Program

PASCO Signs Wave Window Agreement

Anchorage Radio Standard Operating Guidelines

Presented To: NAM/CAR/SAM Regions Air Traffic Services Inter-Facility Data Communication (AIDC) Implementation Meeting

VIRTUAL AIR TRAFFIC SIMULATION NETWORK CARIBBEAN DIVISION ZSU SAN JUAN CERAP

The IFR Burger. Here is the flight plan: FIM.V186.DEANO.V27.KWANG Cruise Altitude: 6000 ft. ZLA Tech Route: BURN39

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

Letter of Agreement. between. and

Letter of Agreement. IVAO German & France Divisions. 1. Purpose. 2. General procedures

Automation Interface Update North American, Caribbean and Central America

Section 5. Radar Separation

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

Transcription:

Letter of Agreement Between New York Radar and Neighbors Revision 1.1 Date: X/XX/2006 For ZNY: Matthew Kreilein, Traffic Management Coordinator (TMC) For ZBW: NAME HERE For ZDC: Mike Roda, Airspace ManagerFor ZJX: NAME HERE For ZMA (and oceanic): NAME HERE For JZS: NAME HERE For TZP: NAME HERE For PPO: NAME HERE For ZQX (and oceanic): NAME HERE For ZQM: NAME HERE Chapter 1 General Information Section 1 Purpose This document contains the requirements of the neighbors of New York Radar ( oceanic ) for traffic entering their ARTCC/FIR s as well as the requirements of New York Radar for traffic entering it s airspace.. Section 2 Assumptions It shall be assumed that all Centers and Oceanic airspaces shall assume control of TRACON airspace within their respective ARTCC/FIR s if the TRACON position is not manned. When this occurs, all airspace and altitude restrictions and crossing instructions agreed to below still apply, and handoffs that normally go to Approach positions will go to Center. Section 3 Nomenclature In addition to standard use of the airport identifier (KJFK = Kennedy Intl Airport), the following will be used regularly throughout the document: ZBW = Boston ARTCC; NYR = New York Radar, ZNY = New York ARTCC; ZDC = Washington ARTCC, ZJX = Jacksonville ARTCC, ZMA = Miami ARTCC, ZMO = Miami Oceanic, JZS = San Juan FIR, TZP = Piarco FIR, PPO = Santa Maria FIR, ZQX = Gander FIR, ZQO = Gander Oceanic, ZQM = Moncton FIR, CTR = Center, APP = Approach; DEP = Departure. Section 4 New York Radar Information For flight simulation use only not for real world operational use 1

With the installation and use of ATOP in the real world on or about March 2005, New York Oceanic became New York Radar instead of New York Radio. Our goal is to model that on VATSIM. What that means the most for our neighbors is really only two small things: 1) Separation minima for New York Oceanic airspace has been reduced to 30 nm instead of the previous 100 nm. 2) The aircraft are radar identified and issued (remain using) a discreet sq code so a typical ASRC handoff with acceptance from the receiving controller will be used (don t be surprised when you get a few odd huhs when you tell them to contact outright and keep them on a discreet sq code). Section 5 Provisions applicable to ALL traffic to and from ALL ARTCC/FIR s from New York Radar as well as to New York Radar A) Traffic entering ZNO does not need to contact NY Radar for an oceanic clearance. B) Traffic entering NY Oceanic airspace must be separated by at least 30 nm from all neighboring ARTCCs. C) Traffic entering the following sectors from NY Oceanic will be separated by at least 30 nm: Boston ARTCC, New York ARTCC, Washington ARTCC, Jacksonville ARTCC, Miami ARTCC, San Juan FIR, Gander FIR, and Moncton FIR D) Traffic entering the following sectors from NY Oceanic will be separated by at least 100 nm: Gander Oceanic, Santa Maria FIR, Piarco FIR, and Miami Oceanic. E) All handoffs must be initiated no less than 10 nm from the sector border, and at no time may an aircraft enter NY Oceanic or leave NY Oceanic and enter a neighboring sector with out completion of the handoff. For nonradar facilities, coordination by chatbox is, of course, acceptable. Chapter 2 New York Radar and Boston ARTCC For flight simulation use only not for real world operational use 2

Section 1 Entering New York Oceanic A) Departing KBOS, KPVD, and All Points West Enter New York Oceanic at HILRY intxn, a climb to filed cruise altitude may be issued at ZBW s discretion. B) Cape Departures Enter NY Oceanic at HILRY intxn, with instruction to c/m 17,000 C) Other Departures Please route any other departures or over flights to enter NY Oceanic at HILRY as much as possible. Any altitudes are valid for entry except those prescribed above. Section 2 Entering Boston ARTCC for Landing A) Arriving KBOS, KPVD, and Points Between KBOS/KPVD and Cape Arriving KBOS: Enter ZBW at HILRY with instruction to cross HILRY at/below FL220 and to expect direct LFV VOR after HILRY to join the SCUPP3 (if filed) Arriving KPVD: Enter ZBW at HILRY with instruction to cross HILRY at/below FL220 and to proceed direct MVY VOR. Arriving Other: Enter ZBW at HILRY with instruction to cross HILRY at/below FL220 and to depart HILRY heading 340 for final vectors into arrival B) Cape Arrivals Enter ZBW at HILRY with instruction to cross HILRY at/maintain 10000 / 250 KIAS. KACK will be told to expect direct ACK VOR, KMVY arrivals to expect direct MVY VOR, and KHYA/KFMH arrivals to expect direct FMH VOR after HILRY. C) Arriving All Other Destinations West of KBOS/KPVD Enter ZBW at HILRY with instruction to cross HILRY at/below FL400 then put direct next waypoint in ZBW airspace most direct to arrival. For flight simulation use only not for real world operational use 3

Chapter 3 New York Radar and Washington ARTCC Section 1 Entering New York Oceanic A) Departing PCT Route via B24 (SIE direct CHAMP). A climb to filed cruise altitude may be given at ZDC s discretion. B) KACY Departures Also route via B24 (SIE CHAMP) and give a climb to FL230 C) Other Departures Please route any other departures or over flights to enter NY Oceanic at either JETER (via SIE direct CHAMP) for northern aircraft, ZIBUT for middle aircraft, or BACUS for southern aircraft as much as possible. Any altitudes are valid for entry except those prescribed above Section 2 Entering Washington ARTCC for Landing A) Arriving PCT Aircraft landing PCT from NY Oceanic will be routed in 3 main ways. Northern arrivals will be routed via CHAMP SIE VOR and will be instructed to cross SIE VOR at/below FL220. Middle arrivals will be routed via ZIBUT and told to expect ORF VOR after ZIBUT and will cross into ZDC at filed cruise altitude (~240 nm ZIBUT AML direct). Southern arrivals will enter at BACUS and told to expect ORF VOR after BACUS and will also cross at final cruise altitude. B) KACY Arrivals Enter ZDC via CHAMP direct ACY VOR and will cross sector at/maintain 10000. C) Other Arrivals Enter ZDC at one of the points above at filed cruise altitude if destination airport is west of a line from PCT to RDU and at/below FL240 if destination airport is East of that line. Section 3 Arriving Philadelphia International NY Oceanic will give instructions for aircraft to cross JETER at/maintain FL200 and will hand off to ZDC center prior to JETER, who will then hand off to NY ATC when applicable per ZNY/ZDC LOA. For flight simulation use only not for real world operational use 4

Chapter 4 New York Radar and Jacksonville ARTCC As there is ~230 nm from NY Oceanic to the US Coastline, no special altitude restrictions should be necessary. Traffic to/from ZJX/ZNO should be directed to cross into the sectors at HANRI, JAINS, or TROUT as much as possible. Chapter 5 New York Radar and Miami ARTCC As there is ~230 nm from NY Oceanic to the US Coastline, no special altitude restrictions should be necessary. Traffic to/from ZMA/ZNO should be directed to cross into the sectors at LOUIZ. Chapter 6 New York Radar and Miami Oceanic Traffic should enter/exit ZNO/ZMO at MAYPL, BROOM, GRATX, MILLE, LETON, or LAMER. Traffic arriving at destinations in ZMO will cross the sector boundary at/below FL220. Traffic entering ZNO may be climbed to filed cruise altitude by ZMO. Chapter 7 New York Radar and San Juan FIR Approx 325 nm separates land in San Juan FIR and the ZNO border. No crossing restrictions are necessary for entry/exit into ZNO/JZS. Traffic should be routed from JZS to ZNO via KRAFT and traffic routed via GRANN if going from ZNO to JZS. For traffic arriving PJM from the Eastern ZNO/JZS border, will be instructed to cross the sector boundary at/below FL200. Chapter 8 New York Radar and Piarco FIR Traffic bound for TFFR and points West will enter TZP at N18W060 and told to expect direct either PPR, ANU, or SKB VORs and will cross the sector boundary at/below FL200 Traffic bound for points East of TFFR will enter TZP at N18W060 and to expect direct FOF VOR and will cross the sector boundary at/below FL300. Chapter 9 New York Radar and Gander Oceanic and Santa Maria FIR Other than separation, no special instructions should be necessary. For flight simulation use only not for real world operational use 5

Chapter 10 New York Radar and Gander FIR Arrivals to Gander FIR should be routed via BOBTU and cross the sector boundary at FL400 or lower filed cruise altitude Deps from Gander FIR should be routed into ZNO via BOBTU and may be climbed to filed cruise altitude. Chapter 11 New York Radar and Moncton FIR Arrivals to Moncton FIR will be routed via CUDAS, ENGLE, FOCUS, or JEBBY and will enter Moncton FIR at FL400 or lower filed cruise altitude.. Deps from Moncton FIR should be routed into ZNO via either CUDAS, ENGLE, FOCUS, or JEBBY and may be climbed to filed cruise altitude. For flight simulation use only not for real world operational use 6