PART 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. English Translation of the Russian Original

Similar documents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Partial Amended Submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in Respect of the North Area

Submission of REPUBLICA ORIENTAL DEL URUGUAY. to the COMMISSION ON THE LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF

The following ministries, departments and agencies of the Government of the Solomon Islands involved in the preparation of the Submission:

UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

The Senate and the Chamber of Representatives of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay, meeting in general assembly, decree:

Taken from UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Marine Protection Rules Part 141 Ship Design, Construction, Equipment and Operation Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk

UNCLOS Law of the Seas. Student Activity. That s not a rock in my water!

Maritime Areas Act, 1983 (1)(Act No. 15 of 19 May 1983)

Law on the boundaries of the maritime tract, 10 March 1993

The Aegean Maritime Disputes and International Law

ARTWEI ARTWEI ARTWEI

Washington College of Law Library. This Book Belonged to The Private Collection

Order on the discharge of oil from ships in the exclusive economic zone around Greenland

CROSS-BORDER TRADE IN SERVICES

LAWS OF DOMINICA TERRITORIAL SEA, CONTIGUOUS ZONE, EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC AND FISHERY ZONES ACT CHAPTER 1:11. Act 26ofl981

Application for a Research Cruise within Waters under Ireland s Jurisdiction

Order for Greenland on the safe navigation, etc. of ships

Introduction to the Data Catalogue

Cooperation Agreements for SAR Service and COSPAS-SARSAT SEARCH AND RESCUE AGREEMENTS: OVERVIEW. (Presented by United States)

NEW TRAFFIC SEPARATION SCHEMES

Bosnia and Herzegovina

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 3 October 2013 (OR. en) 13408/13 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0020 (NLE) TRANS 466 MAR 126

NEW TRAFFIC SEPARATION SCHEMES

L 342/20 Official Journal of the European Union

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /2010

THE HYDROGRAPHIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC BRIGADE OF THE SEYCHELLES COAST GUARD REPORT FOR 2008 SAIHC7-5.3I

APPLICATION OF THE NO-SPECIAL-FEE SYSTEM IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES-AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STUDY GROUP (AIS-AIMSG)

Official Gazette of the French Republic No of 1 November Text No. 6

Decrees, orders, circulars

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

EN Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Report on Geographic Scope of Market-based Measures (MBMS)

Annex 1 to letter 0426(DPRM.REM)1035 of 16 April I. Articles 28 and 29 of the UPU Convention. Article 28 Terminal dues. General provisions

Delegations will find attached document D042244/03.

DECISION NUMBER NINETEEN TO THE TREATY ON OPEN SKIES

CONFERENCE ON THE ECONOMICS OF AIRPORTS AND AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES

DECLARATION OF JUDGE SEBUTINDE

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

AGREEMENT BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA FOR AIR SERVICES

DIRECTIVE 2002/30/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

(i) Adopted or adapted airworthiness and environmental standards;

CHAPTER FISHERY LIMITS ORDINANCE and Subsidiary Legislation

International Boundary Study. Tanzania Uganda Boundary

STATUS OF MONTENEGRO WITH REGARD TO INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW INSTRUMENTS

Conference on Search and Rescue

ANNEX 7. RESOLUTION MSC.343(91) (adopted on 30 November 2012)

2. Dominican Republic

IHO Capacity Building in the South West Pacific Region NZ Perspective. Adam Greenland National Hydrographer Land Information New Zealand

Technical Arrangement on Aircraft Maintenance between the Transport Canada Civil Aviation Directorate and the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand

Assembly Resolutions in Force

Assembly Resolutions in Force

CHAPTER 37 AN ACT TO AMEND THE LABRADOR INUIT LAND CLAIMS AGREEMENT ACT NO. 2. Analysis

Marine Protection Rules Part 170: Prevention of Pollution from Garbage from Ships

Marine Protection Rules

EASA NPA on SERA Part ENAV Response sheet. GENERAL COMMENTS ON NPA PACKAGE Note: Specific comments are provided after the General Comments

9 June I:\CIRC\MSC\01\1305.doc INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR

IMO RECYCLING OF SHIPS

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Mapping Data reported to AIM

GEOPOLITICAL INDICATORS OF THE OCEANS. World Percentage Earth 29,6 Percentage oceans 36,2. 0,009 million km²

Seychelles Annex VII. National data and information management plan

Order on the discharge of oil from ships 1

GUIDANCE RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SOLAS CHAPTER XI-2 AND THE ISPS CODE

OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVA PRISTINA

AIR TRAFFIC AND NAVIGATION SERVICES COMPANY SOC LIMITED

CHAPTER 12: AERONAUTICAL CHARTS AND NAVIGATION

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /

REPORT OF THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE ON ITS SIXTY-THIRD SESSION Corrigenda

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP. SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT

IRELAND SAFETY REGULATION DIVISION

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

DMA RO Circular no. 002

The Legal Framework for RPAS/UAS Suitability of the Chicago Convention and its Annexes

MERCHANT SHIPPING (PREVENTION OF POLLUTION BY GARBAGE) REGULATIONS 2005 BR 48 / 2005 MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT : 35

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY STUDY. SERIES A. LIMITS IN THE SEAS. NUM--ETC(UI UNCLASSIFI1ED EN~D

Marine Protection Rules Part 101B: Surveys and Inspections Noxious Liquid Substances Carried in Bulk

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW. (Beijing, 30 August 10 September 2010) ICAO LEGAL COMMITTEE 1

Circular 330-AN/189 Civil/Military Cooperation in Air Traffic Management. Sven Halle ICAO- Paris

AIR NAVIGATION COMMISSION

Draft LAW. ON SOME AMENDAMENTS IN THE LAW No.9587, DATED ON THE PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY AS AMENDED. Draft 2. Version 1.

Marine Protection Rules Part 300: Ballast Water Management

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

New Zealand Hydrographic Authority HYPLAN. Version April 2017

M/V. Tonnage Measurement (ITC-69) Tartous Naval Architect. Guardian Bureau of Shipping LLC Page 1 of 14 Form 5510/TM-69/GBS/DEL/01

SUMMARY REPORT ON THE SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT FOLLOW-UP OF THE CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF SLOVENIA

AIR NAVIGATION COMMISSION

SAR: Safety defence or broken fence?

Estonia. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES TO AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STUDY GROUP (AIS-AIMSG)

FACILITATION (FAL) DIVISION TWELFTH SESSION. Cairo, Egypt, 22 March to 2 April 2004

37 th Annual Conference on the Law of the Sea and Ocean Policy Seoul, 1-3 May Cooperation in the Straits of Malacca & Singapore

Agreement on the operation of the Kolarctic CBC Programme Branch Office in Norway

Aeronautical Information Services Issue 1 30 May 2012

MODEL AERONAUTICAL ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA

Transcription:

REVISION OF THE PARTIAL SUBMISSION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO THE COMMISSION ON THE LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF RELATED TO THE CONTINENTAL SHELF IN THE SEA OF OKHOTSK PART 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY English Translation of the Russian Original 2013

2 Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Extended continental shelf.... 4 3. Provisions of Article 76 invoked in support of the submission.. 6 4. Commission members who provided advice during the preparation of the submission.. 6 5. Provisions related to position of Japan in regard of Submission presented by the Russian Federation to Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in 2001 9 6. State bodies responsible for the preparation of the submission.. 9

3 List of Figures Fig. 1. Extended continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles in the area of the enclave (red) in the Sea of Okhotsk (Russian Nautical Charts, sheets 60101 and 60102) Fig. 2. 3D image of the seabed of the Sea of Okhotsk The extended continental shelf in the area beyond 200 nautical miles in the area of the enclave (chlorine area) is shown. Yellow dots show the location of the foot of the continental slope. Fig. 3. 3D image of the seabed of the Sea of Okhotsk The extended continental shelf in the area beyond 200 nautical miles in the area of the enclave is bounded by a red line. Yellow dots show the location of the foot of the continental slope.

1. Introduction 4 The Russian Federation signed the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (referred to as the Convention) on 10 December 1982 and ratified it on 26 February 1997. The Convention came into force for the Russian Federation on 11 April 1997. This submission is made pursuant to Article 76, paragraph 8 of the Convention. It is a partial submission only related to the area of the Sea of Okhotsk. This area was a part of the first submission made by the Russian Federation on 10 December 2001 in respect to all Russian extended continental shelf, which was considered by the Commission at its eleventh session held from 24 to 28 June 2002. The recommendations of the Commission adopted at that session stated in respect to the Sea of Okhotsk, that: «89. The Commission considers that in the Sea of Okhotsk, the submission needs to be supported by additional data and information. A submission in this region may require the application of the two formulae and the two constraints contained in paragraphs 4 and 5 of article 76». «163. The Commission recommends to the Russian Federation to make a welldocumented partial submission in the northern part of the Sea of Okhotsk. This partial submission shall not prejudice questions relating to the delimitation of boundaries between States in the south for which a submission may be made later, notwithstanding the provisions regarding the ten year time-limit established by article 4 of Annex II to the Convention». The present partial submission was prepared with due regard to the above recommendations of the Commission. 2. Extended Continental Shelf This submission is presented with the aim to include in the extended continental shelf under Article 76 of the Convention the seabed and subsoil of a sea enclave bounded by the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation in the area of the Sea of Okhotsk located between 50 42 N 55 42 N and 148 30 E 150 44 E. It is stated in Article 3, paragraph 1 of the Federal Law «On the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Russian Federation» ( 191, dated 17 December 1998) that: «The outer limit of the exclusive economic zone is established at a distance of 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured, if otherwise is not provided for by international agreements of the Russian Federation». Thus, the outer limit line of the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation in the Sea of Okhotsk is the line at a distance of 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured in the context of Article 76 of the Convention. The outer limit line of the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation in the northern Sea of Okhotsk is shown on the official charts of a scale 1:2 000 000, published by Department of Navigation and Oceanography, Russian Ministry of Defence (sheets 60101 and 60102) in accordance with Article 75, Paragraph 1 of the Convention, which states that: «Subject to this Part, the outer limit lines of the exclusive economic zone and the lines of delimitation drawn in accordance with article 74 shall be shown on charts of a scale or scales adequate for ascertaining their position. Where appropriate, lists of geographical coordinates of points, specifying the geodetic datum, may be submitted for such outer limit lines or lines of delimitation».

5 Fig. 1. Extended continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles in the area of the enclave (red) in the Sea of Okhotsk (Russian Nautical Charts, sheets 60101 and 60102) Therefore, the line of outer limit of the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation shown on the above mentioned official charts is an official legitimate line at a distance of 200 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured. The seabed and subsoil of the enclave beyond this line is a part of the natural prolongation of the Russian land territory and it is an extended continental shelf of the Russian Federation in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 76. This enclave is located within the geomorphological and geological continental shelf with irregular seabed topography, which has been reworked and eroded as a result of tectonic processes. It is entirely situated landward of the foot of the continental slope, which can be clearly determined on the basis of morphological and bathymetric evidence. The foot of the slope is located to the south of the enclave in the southern Sea of Okhotsk and it can be continuously traced at water depths of 2500-3000 m from the northern part of Hokkaido Island through the southern part of Sakhalin Island and eastward along the northern edge of the Kuril (South Okhotsk) Basin towards Kamchatka Peninsula.

6 Geological and geophysical data provide additional evidence for the location of the parts of the continental margin under paragraph 3 of Article 76 and support locating the base of the foot of the slope in that area. The enclave under consideration is entirely situated landward of the 2 500 m isobath and it is located within 350 NM limit from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured. Thus, the entire area of the seabed and subsoil of the said enclave beyond 200 NM zone is a part of the extended continental shelf in accordance with Article 76. Since the enclave is entirely situated landward of the base of the foot of the continental slope, no outer limits of the extended continental shelf are proposed and, in accordance with Article 76, no list of relevant coordinates is required. 3. Provisions of Article 76 invoked in support of the submission In support of the submission the following provisions of Article 76 were invoked: Paragraph 1 with regard to concept of the continental shelf being a natural prolongation of land territory to the outer edge of the continental margin beyond 200 NM zone; Paragraph 3 in relation to the components of the continental margin; Paragraph 4 partially, only in respect to the criteria to define the foot of the continental slope according to paragraph 4(b) of Article 76 on the basis of morphologic and bathymetric evidence. 4. Commission members who provided advice during the preparation of the submission During preparation of the submission the assistance was provided by the member of the Commission Dr. Ivan F. Glumov. No advice was provided by any other member of the Commission.

7 Fig. 2. 3D image of the seabed of the Sea of Okhotsk The extended continental shelf in the area beyond 200 nautical miles in the area of the enclave (chlorine area) is shown. Yellow dots show the location of the foot of the continental slope.

8 Fig. 3. 3D image of the seabed of the Sea of Okhotsk The extended continental shelf in the area beyond 200 nautical miles in the area of the enclave is bounded by a red line. Yellow dots show the location of the foot of the continental slope.

5. Provisions related to position of Japan in regard of Submission presented by the Russian Federation to Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in 2001 9 In accordance with Item 2 of Annex I (CLCS/40/Rev.1) the Russian Federation informs the Commission concerning the unresolved question of delimitation of maritime boundaries between Russia and Japan in the southern Sea of Okhotsk. The present Submission does not contain any maps on which the baselines are determined from points situated in the southern part of the Sea of Okhotsk. The enclave that constitutes the subject of the present Submission lies in the northern part of the Sea of Okhotsk and does not encumber on the part of the Sea of Okhotsk in which the territorial delimitation between the Russian Federation and Japan is not settled. The nearest points of baselines used in the present Submission are 480 km away from the area awaiting delimitation of maritime boundaries between Russian Federation and Japan. Based on the aforesaid, the Russian Federation maintains that the present Submission makes no prejudice to the issues related to delimitation of marine boundaries between Japan and the Russian Federation in the southern Sea of Okhotsk. 6. State bodies responsible for the preparation of the submission The Federal Subsoil Resources Management Agency («Rosnedra») of the Russian Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology, and the Department of Navigation and Oceanography of the Russian Ministry of Defence are the state bodies responsible for the preparation of the submission. The text of the submission as well as all maps, figures, appendixes and databases of the submission were prepared by the All-Russian Research Institute on Geology and Mineral Resources of the World Ocean (VNIIOkeangeologia) of the Federal Subsoil Resources Management Agency.