Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) Update. Public Information Meeting #4 June 8 & 9, 2016

Similar documents
Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) Update. Public Information Meeting #2 December 1, 2015

AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATILIBILTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILIITY

Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Update

APPENDIX K LAND USE. Charles M. Schulz - Sonoma County Airport Draft Environmental Impact Report July 2011 K-1

The following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Consistency Determination Betteravia Plaza. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 8D

Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

Memorandum. Federal Aviation Administration. Date: June 19, Richard Doucette, Environmental Protection Specialist. From: To:

Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Land Use Compatibility Advisory Circular ACI-NA / FAA. FAA HQ Washington, DC March 27, 2013

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Old Town Village Mixed Use Project City of Goleta. MEETING DATE: June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 5M

CHAPTER 6 NOISE EXPOSURE

Airport Land-Use Compatibility

Master Plan & Noise Compatibility Study Update

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

Lincoln Regional Airport Compatibility Policies and Maps

Land Use and Environmental Control

FAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance

APPENDIX F LAND USE PLANNING FOR AIRPORTS AND POCATELLO REGIONAL AIRPORT LAND USE COMPLIANCE

APPENDIX C NOISE ANALYSIS

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

General Aviation Land Use Planning

THE BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY S UPDATE REGARDING ITS NOISE IMPACT AREA REDUCTION PLAN AND ITS PART 161 STUDY SECOND QUARTER 2015

WELCOME! FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 14 CFR PART 150 NOISE AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY STUDY

THE BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY S UPDATE REGARDING ITS NOISE IMPACT AREA REDUCTION PLAN AND ITS PART 161 STUDY FIRST QUARTER 2015

Federal Aviation Administration DCA. By: Terry Biggio, Vice President Air Traffic Services Date: June 18, Federal Aviation Administration

at: Accessed May 4, 2011.

THE BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY S UPDATE REGARDING ITS NOISE IMPACT AREA REDUCTION PLAN AND ITS PART 161 STUDY SECOND QUARTER 2017

Public Release AICUZ Study Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) Study NAS Pensacola and NOLF Saufley. May 2011

Comparison Between Old and New ALUC Plans

ARTICLE 34 AIRPORT HEIGHT COMBINING ZONE (AH) (Amended by Ordinance #295 Effective June 26, 2009)

Reliever Airports: NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN Flying Cloud Airport (FCM)

Review of Airport Noise Issues East Airfield Development Area

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

ADVISORY CIRCULAR ON LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN THE VICINITY OF AERODROMES

Why are the underground fuel tanks being removed and replaced with above ground tanks?

Guidance material for land use at or near aerodromes

Welcome to Public Information Workshop 1. San Francisco International Airport FAR Part 150 Study Update Noise Exposure Map Report

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Noise Contour Map Update. For Publication on MWAA Website April 4, 2018

Windmills & Airspace Can We Work Together?

ARTICLE III: LAND USE DISTRICTS 385 PRIVATE USE AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT

Chapter AIRPORT ZONING

WELCOME! FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 14 CFR PART 150 NOISE AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY STUDY

FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA. Phone: Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951)

APPENDIX A FAA POLICIES, GUIDANCE, AND REGULATIONS

Article 11 Airport District

Off-Airport Land Use Compatibility Planning

ORDINANCE NO. _2013-

AIRPORT COMPLIANCE th Texas Aviation Conference. 3/29/2018 Date. Footer Text

Contents. Page 1 of 11 / Draft Chapter 142 Version CHAPTER AIRPORT ZONING... 2 ARTICLE I. - IN GENERAL... 2

DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2016 IGA NOISE RELEASE STUDY. June 22, 2016

Airport Planning Area

Regional Bird/Wildlife Strike Prevention Conference Conferencia de Prevención del Peligro Aviario y Fauna

The Noise & Environmental office reviews airline schedules and night-time performance of the airlines operating at the Airport.

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D

Control of Airport- and Aircraft-Related Noise in the United States

Lehigh Valley International Airport 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update. Community Advisory Committee Meeting #1

THE LAW OF AIRPORT NOISE

PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM. COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 4g ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting February 9, 2016

Chapter 9 Aviation. Springfield-Branson National Airport

PRELIMINARY WEB DOCUMENT

Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. April 18, 2012

APA NOISE REPORT. January 2018

APA NOISE REPORT. August 2017

Background Data: Blue Canyon Airport and Environs

St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP)

APA NOISE REPORT. August 2018

PLAN Anoka County - Blaine Airport

LAX Community Noise Roundtable. Aircraft Noise 101. November 12, 2014

Memorandum. Approval of Noise Compatibility Date SEP 7 Program for Akron-Canton Regional Airport, North Canton, Ohio ACT! IQN:

AIRPORT PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LAND ACQUISITION

RTIA Runway Utilization Discussion Paper

DRAFT GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MIDDLETON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MOREY FIELD. Revised 12/12/03

Public Workshop #7 Land Use Planning June 28, 2016

2015 PURDUE ROAD SCHOOL March 11, 2015

PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. March 20, 2019 AGENDA. 1. Review Minutes. 1

During all other times operators are required to use the designated run-up locations for run-ups above idle power.

PUBLIC INFORMATION WORKSHOP #4 / PUBLIC HEARING November 8 / 9, 2006

Portland International Jetport FAR Part 150 Update

TORONTO PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NOISE MANAGEMENT

Boise Airport 14 CFR Part 150 Study Update

The Law of Noise Regulation Daniel S. Reimer

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Aviation Legal Update: Policy on the Non-Aeronautical Use of Airport Hangars

Planning Challenges and Solutions

SFAR 93 and Minimum Altitudes

msp macnoise.com MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) November 17, 2010

Hearings will be held in the Shirley Huffman Auditorium in the Charles D. Cameron Public Services Building, 155 North First Avenue, Hillsboro, Oregon.

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

AIR TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

NOTICE TO PROPOSED CITY PERMITS: ZONING HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS/APPROVAL PROCESS

College Park, Georgia; and Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport (ATL) City of College Park

Chapter 9 - AIRPORT SYSTEM DESIGN

Notice of Extended Comment Period for an Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

Livermore Municipal Airport and Vicinity Data

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

Beale Air Force Base Land Use Compatibility Plan

Transcription:

Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) Update Public Information Meeting #4 June 8 & 9, 2016

Agenda 1. Study Process 2. Noise Complaint Patterns 3. Proposed Overflight Areas (AOA) 4. Proposed Land Use Compatibility Policies 5. Proposed Implementation Steps 6. Questions 2

Study Process Current Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan completed in 1996 & Part 150 Noise Study in 2000 Maintain compliance w/ State law (ARS 28-8485) Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) formed- 4 meetings Public Information Meetings- 3 held Draft plan & recommendations complete Project website: http://www.phxmesagateway.org/landusestudy.aspx 3

What the ALUCP is Updated land use compatibility plan for the Airport & adjacent jurisdictions Capacity-based approach Protection of airspace and capacity while complying with FAA grant assurances Allows for compatible development around the airport Communication & outreach tool for planned operations growth 4

What the ALUCP is not Change to air traffic patterns and flight procedures Time-based study An impact or restriction to existing uses A restriction on proposed/new compatible development 5

Noise Complaint Density 10 years of noise calls (2005-2015) 2,400± calls plotted Accounts for multiple calls from single locations Notes: Black dots are noise complaint locations Colored patterns indicates the density/frequency of complaints 6

Recap: Annual Service Volume Annual Service Volume (ASV): The annual number of operations that can be accommodated without unacceptable delay (4 to 6 minutes/operation). USER CATEGORY OPERATIONS (TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS) Itinerant Local Total Air Carrier 32,123 0 32,123 Air Taxi 50,819 0 50,819 General Aviation 159,904 247,383 407,287 Military 3,755 4,017 7,772 Total 246,600 251,400 498,000 NOTE: In 2014, the Airport had 225,181 operations. Source: Analysis by Ricondo & Associates, Inc., October 2015. 7

Recap: Proposed Overflight Areas I & II Updated 65 DNL (AOA I) Boundary (4± Square Miles) Updated 60 DNL (AOA II) Boundary (9± Square Miles) Current 65 DNL Boundary (6± Square Miles) Current 60 DNL Boundary (12± Square Miles) - Square mile total includes on airport area 8

Airport Influence Area Indicators 1. Low altitude flight tracks 2. Generalized touch-and-go flight tracks 3. Noise complaint locations 4. 14 CFR Part 77 airspace 5. DNL 55 noise contour 6. FAA-recommended wildlife separation distances 7. Gateway tower controlled airspace 8. Traffic Pattern Airspace (per JO 7400.2K) 9

Airport Influence Indicators 10

Proposed Airport Influence Area AOA 3 11

Proposed AOA Boundaries 12

Proposed Noise and Public Safety Policies Update AOA 1 based on projected DNL 65 contour Update AOA 2 based on projected DNL 60 contour Prohibit uses involving hazardous substances in AOA 1 Prohibit highly noise-sensitive land uses in AOA 1 and AOA 2 Prohibit less sensitive uses in AOA 1; require sound insulation, disclosure, and easements in AOA 2 Require real estate disclosure for all noise-sensitive uses allowed in AOA 3 13

Proposed Noise and Public Safety Policies Overflight Zone/Noise Exposure Range (DNL) LAND USE MATRIX AOA 1 AOA 2 AOA 3 65+ 60-65 60-APA Residential 1, 2, 3 Commercial, Office, Service, Transient Lodging Hotels, motels 25 1, 4 25 1,4 1 Retail; professional, personal services; office; auto services; repair services 5 Indoor recreation, amusements, athletic clubs, gyms, spectator events 5 Theaters, playhouses, concert halls, performing arts centers 25 1,4 1 Outdoor sports, entertainment, public assembly, amphitheaters 1, 4 1 Educational, Institutional, Public Services Hospitals, other health care facilities 1 Elementary and secondary schools, preschools, day care centers 1 Colleges, universities, trade schools 25 1, 4 25 1, 4 1 Religious facilities; libraries; museums; clubs; lodges 25 1, 4 1 Industrial Manufacturing, processing, and assembly general 5 Refining, manufacturing, and storage of chemicals and hazardous materials Agricultural Transportation, Communication, Utilities 5 Recreation, Park, Open Space 5 LEGEND 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 25 Compatible: Use can be allowed. Conditionally Compatible: Use should be allowed subject to stated conditions. Conditionally Compatible: Use should be allowed subject to outdoor-to-indoor noise level reduction of 25 decibels in buildings. Incompatible: Use should not be allowed. 14

Land Use Compatibility Matrix Notes NOTES 1 A fair disclosure agreement and covenant should be recorded as a condition of development approval. 2 All final plats and public reports filed with the Arizona Department of Real Estate should include a fair disclosure notice. 3 Sales and leasing offices for new subdivisions and development projects should provide notice to prospective buyer and lessees that the property is in the APA. 4 Avigation easements should be required which acknowledge that an airport is located nearby and aircraft to/from the airport have a right to fly over the property. 5 The developer should be encouraged to incorporate features into buildings where people live, work, or are otherwise received to achieve an outdoor-to indoor noise level reduction of 25 decibels. 15

Generalized Future Land Use 16

Proposed Airspace Protection Policies Define critical airspace surfaces (14 CFR Part 77, TERPS, OEI) as maximum height limits Composite critical airspace surfaces map is under development Protects 14 CFR Part 77 obstruction, TERPS required obstacle clearance, and emergency flight procedure (OEI) surfaces PMGAA to work with local governments to adopt composite airspace map upon completion Require developers to comply with 14 CFR Part 77 notification requirements Prohibit of objects determined by FAA to be hazards to air navigation, even if critical airspace surfaces are not penetrated 17

Airspace Protection Considerations Underlying city base zoning provides protection in most areas Until composite airspace surfaces map is adopted, use 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces map 18

Structure Height Guidance 19

Proposed Flight Safety Policies Avoid in AOA 1, AOA 2, AOA 3 Glint and glare causing persistent after-image or flash blindness Lighting that can distract pilots or interfere with vision on approach Lights mimicking airport identification and landing lights Dust, smoke, vapor obscuring pilot vision Thermal hazards interfering with aircraft control Electromagnetic interference Bird attractants 20

Proposed Noise and Public Safety Policies Overflight Zone AOA 1 AOA 2 AOA 3 Airspace Protection Objects penetrating a critical airspace surface Objects determined to be hazards Objects not penetrating a critical airspace surface but subject to FAA DNH conditions 1 1 1 Flight Safety Glint and glare causing persistent after image or flash blindness 4 Lighting that can distract pilots or interfere with vision on approach 4 Lighting that can be confused with airport identification and approach lighting 4 Dust, water vapor, or smoke dense enough to impair pilot vision 4 Electromagnetic interference with aviation navigation and communications equipment Bird Attractants Solid waste landfills Trash transfer stations that are not fully enclosed Commercial/institutional composting operations that accept food waste Stormwater management facilities creating standing water 2 2 2 Wastewater treatment facilities and associated settling ponds Wetlands mitigation projects 3 3 3 LEGEND Compatible: Use can be allowed.. 1, 2, 3, 4, Conditionally Compatible: Use should be allowed subject to stated conditions. Incompatible: Use should not be not allowed. 21

Airspace Protection and Flight Safety Matrix Notes NOTES 1 Project sponsor must comply with conditions cited in FAA Determination of No Hazard. 2 Permit only when required by other provisions of municipal, county, or state law. Measures must be taken to minimize the risk of attracting birds. 3 Permit only where projects provide unique functions that must remain on site or are otherwise directed by state or federal law, state or federal regulatory decision, or court order. 4 Most likely to be problematic if located within the area defined by the 14 CFR Part 77 horizontal and outer approach surfaces. 22

Implementation Documents Model avigation easement Model fair disclosure agreement and covenant Model sound insulation standards Model overlay zoning language Standard AZ Association of Realtors Residential Sellers Disclosure form 23

Fair Disclosure Agreement and Covenant Original developer enters into agreement with permitting agency to provide a disclosure notice in the listing materials for properties offered for sale The agreement becomes a covenant running with the land, requiring future owners to make the same disclosure when they offer the property for sale 24

Monitoring and Update of ALUCP Conditions to monitor Major changes in land development trends revealing shortcomings in land use compatibility policies Significant airspace redesign or changes in flight procedures Significant change in operations or aircraft fleet compared with assumptions in ALUCP s long-term noise exposure Future updates shall be coordinated by the Airport with all affected local governments 25

Next Steps 1. Additional public meetings June 8 th - SE Regional Library June 9 th - Queen Creek Library 2. PMGAA Board consideration (July 19 th* ) 3. Height guidance map & overlay completion 4. Record updated Airport Influence Area Map (the APA boundary) with County Recorders (August*) 5. Implementation through City, Town, and County processes (Late 2016-2017*) * Subject to change 26