Recreational Impacts of Coastal Restoration Projects in Louisiana

Similar documents
The Mississippi River Commission. History of the Management of the Mississippi River. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Riverine Sand Mining/Scofield Island Restoration (BA-40)

Galveston Bay Estuary Program. Carla G. Guthrie, Ph.D. Galveston Bay Council Member Texas Water Development Board

Virginian Atlantic (Ecoregion 8)

Engineering With Nature Geographic Project Mapping Tool (EWN ProMap)

LOUISIANA Department of Culture, Recreation, & Tourism

www: vermilionparishpolicejury.com

Header i

Cat Island Chain Background & Access Guide

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

APPENDIX F RECREATION

PRESPA BIOSPHERE RESERVE MANAGEMENT MACEDONIAN PERSPECTIVE

HIGHWAY 17 WILDLIFE and REGIONAL TRAIL CROSSINGS

Alaskan/Fjordland Pacific (Ecoregion 22)

Case Study: 1. The Clarence River Catchment

MARINE PROTECTED AREAS LESSON PLAN Water Parks

William C. Norman & Laura W. Jodice Clemson University Department of Parks, Recreation & Tourism Management

BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL HISTORY HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999

Ecosystem context in the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Dredging Operations in the Argentina s Santa Fe

Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock. Victor A. Landry III Operations Manager, GIWW New Orleans District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

The Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area: Feasibility Study Status Report - September 2013

MCARTHUR SWAMP PLANNING UNIT Pit-McCloud River Watershed

Environmental Impact Assessment of the dredging operations and aids to navigation works in the Argentina s Santa Fe Confluencia waterway.

What is an Marine Protected Area?

State Five Year Tonnage Trend. Shipping Tons Receving Tons Within Tons Total Tons

Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Paper 1F and 3H: Decision-Making Exercise. Wednesday 4 June 2008 Morning Resource Booklet. Advance Information

Restoring Great Waters & National Parks for the 2nd Century of the National Park System: A National Overview

Voluntary Certification Nature-Based Tourism in the Atchafalaya Basin

STREAKED HORNED LARK. Conservation of a threatened species in an industrial landscape. Cat Brown US Fish and Wildlife Service

LIFE+ URBANCOWS - Restoration of urban coastal meadow complex in Pärnu town, Estonia. Bert Holm, PhD.

MANAGING COASTAL HAZARDS THROUGH BENEFICIAL REUSE OF DREDGED SAND AND AN ADAPTIVE WORKS STRATEGY

ICRI Monaco January 2010

Priority Species, Communities, Ecosystems, and Threats

Use and Benefits of Waterways for Recreation. by Tony Harrison CEng, MICE

Atchafalaya Trace. Prepared for: Louisiana Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism. The Louisiana Research Team

Speculative Investment in the Mississippi Delta of the Future

Public Notice ISSUED: December 10, 2018 EXPIRES: January 9, 2019

Recreational Carrying Capacity

An Assessment of the Economic Impacts of Cultural Heritage Projects in Georgia and Macedonia

Finn Creek Park. Management Direction Statement Amendment

Bon Portage Island Conservation Campaign

The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park (Romania)

SAME/SBA CONFERENCE. Col. Christopher W. Sallese Commander, Galveston District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers April 11, 2012

Port Fourchon: A Comprehensive Case Study on Hurricane Preparation & Response

MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION

Segment 2: La Crescent to Miller s Corner

MARBLE RIVER PROVINCIAL PARK

2.1 Physical and Biological Description Matabitchuan River Watershed

DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL HISTORY AVOCA ISLAND LAKE

KOOTENAY LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK (MIDGE CREEK SITE)

Water Resources Update after NCGA Long Session

4.0 Context for the Crossing Project

Appalachian Power Company Smith Mountain Hydroelectric Project FERC No Debris Management Plan

Common Ground Drainage Channel Diversion. Design Report

LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 07/24/2018) Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 07/16/2018

ReefFix. May, For the Organization of American States (OAS) and the Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network (IABIN)

WHY THERE IS NO STORM SURGE PROTECTION FOR THE LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN BASIN

Coverage of Mangrove Ecosystem along Three Coastal Zones of Puerto Rico using IKONOS Sensor

Stakeholder Meeting #1. An Introduction to the Blind Pass Inlet Management Study

We, Ministers, assembled in Berlin for the International Conference on Biodiversity and Tourism from 6 to 8 March 1997

AMERICAN S PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION: Results From NSRE 2000 (With weighted data) (Round 1)

Conservation Results In An Urban Environment Through Public-Private Partnerships

Hudson Bay Lowlands Proposed Protected Areas

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

Appendix C. Past and Current Management of Selected Tidal Wetland Sites

The Partnership Wild & Scenic Rivers Program

Jamaica Member Report

Map 1.1 Wenatchee Watershed Land Ownership

TRAILS WHERE TO FIND TRAILS IN NOVA SCOTIA

Maximising Beneficial Reuse through the use of a Novel Dredging Contract

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

Old Document: Appendices 54 pages (2.42 MB) 8/9/13 11:36:55 PM -07'00'

ECOTOURISM ON MAR CHIQUITA LAGOON, CORDOBA: VISITORS CHARACTERISTICS AND PREFERENCES

Watchorn Provincial Park. Management Plan

33. Coiba National Park and its Special Zone of Marine Protection (Panama) N 1138 rev)

KETTLE CREEK CONSERVATION AUTHORITY TRAIL GUIDE.

Internship Announcement. Mount Rainier National Park. NPS Academy Internships 6 Positions. Please Respond By March 1, 2019

Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District

Deerfield ranch. A Sportsman s Paradise

10/25/2013. What is the SCORP?! 2013 Local Government Survey 2013 Statewide Public Survey Advisory Group Priority Areas Your Suggestions!

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of Recreation and Parks

photos Department of Environment and Conservation Biodiversity Conservation

An Introduction. The Saginaw River/Bay Area of Concern

NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR IMPACT ON PORT DEVELOPMENT IN JAMAICA. Christopher Hamilton May

The minutes of the previous meeting, having been circulated, were taken as read and signed as a true record.

BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL PILOT PROGRAM

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DECISION GUIDE WORKSHEETS

Rocky Lake Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Bear River ECC Final Meeting Notes April 20, 2016 Pocatello, ID

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

Rue La Fourche. Connecting: Art. Culture. Heritage

ACADIA PLANTATION RECORDS (Mss 4906) Appendix E Oversized materials from Series V. Maps, Plats, and Photographs Location: Room B6-OS:A

TEXAS PORTS Value to the Nation

Washakie Wilderness Ranch

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION STATEMENT June, 1999

PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM. COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 4g ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting February 9, 2016

Nicole Auil Gomez, MSc. Manatee By-Catch Pilot Project Holbox, Mexico ~ June 26-28, 2012

Statistical Evaluation of BMP Effectiveness in Reducing Fecal Coliform Impairment in Mermentau River Basin

Transcription:

Recreational Impacts of Coastal Restoration Projects in Louisiana i National Conference on Ecosystem Restoration Baltimore, MD Joseph Berlin and Andrew Perez August 5, 2011

Recreational Impacts were Estimated for Five Projects White Ditch Sediment Diversion Atchafalaya Freshwater Conveyance MRGO Ecosystem Restoration Davis Pond Freshwater Diversion Ops Plan Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion Ops Plan

Location of the Five Coastal Restoration Projects

White Ditch Sediment Diversion Mississippi River East Bank South of New Orleans One Feature - a Structure Four Alternative Diversion Flows

Atchafalaya Freshwater Conveyance Northern Lafourche Parish Several Features Features combined into Seven Alternatives

MRGO Ecosystem Restoration Large Study Area Many Features Features Combined into Seven Alternatives

Stages of a Federal Project Reconnaissance Study Feasibility Study Alternative Selection Preconstruction Engineering and Design Construction Operation and Maintenance Recreation Impacts must be Quantified in Feasibility Study for Environmental Projects

Three Approved Procedures to Measure National Economic Development Benefits NED = Net Welfare Increase for Nation Travel Cost Method Requires Detailed Data for Travel Expenses / Travel Distances Contingent Valuation Requires Surveys of Recreational Users for Willingness to Pay

Three Approved Procedures to Measure Economic Benefits of Recreation Unit Day Values (FY 10) Based Upon Specified Criteria to Determine Value of Recreation Day Four Criteria must be Satisfied to Use UDV General Fishing and Hunting - $5.15 to $10.75 per day

Criteria for Estimating Unit Day Values Recreation Experience Number of Activities Availability of Opportunity Carrying Capacity Accessibility Environmental Esthetics ti

Data Available from Davis Pond and Caernarvon Diversions Freshwater Discharge Rates from the Davis Pond and Caernarvon Diversions Salinity Measurements LaDWF Creel Surveys Aerial Waterfowl Surveys

Creel Fishing Surveys Intercept Survey Performed by LaDWF Species Sought Several Species Dominate Speckled Trout and Red Drum (Saltwater) Largemouth Bass (Freshwater) Species Caught - Number and Size Perception of Trip

Data Sources Used To Estimate the Number of User Days Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP)-Participation Rate Participation Rate for Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife Watching Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Hunting and Fishing Licenses Issued Boats Registered Boat Launches Surveyed (Location and Size)

Process of Estimating Benefits A Focus Group was Held for Each Project to Obtain Expert Opinions Various Interest Groups Participated in Focus Groups Sportsmen Conservation Groups Government Agencies Major Landowners Project Details were presented to the Focus Group Restoration Measures were Explained Historic Impacts of Diversions were Presented

Focus Group Findings Wildlife Watching may Increase Users are Flexible about Location Users are not Flexible about Activities Hunting and Fishing Remain the Primary Recreation Activities Users will not Change Fish Species Sought

Specific Focus Group Concerns Oyster Reefs are Important to Recreational Fishing Floating Marsh is Important to Waterfowl Hunting Floodgate Operation is Important to Marina Operators

Coastal Restoration Projects Recreation Impacts Freshwater Diversions Impact Salinity and Cause Fish Migrations Waterfowl Populations are Highly Variable but are Reduced by Water Turbidity Subaquatic Vegetation Impairs User Access Spawning may be Impacted

Difficulties in Estimating Impacts Wildlife Watching is Difficult to Measure Number of Users in Study Area is Difficult to Determine Users can Shift Between Areas Most Areas in Coastal Louisiana i have Proposed Restoration Projects

Recreation Benefits Model Atchafalaya Conveyance Alternatives Alt 1 Utilize Flow Management to Maximize Benefits of Existing Flow Alt 2 - Increase Atchafalaya Inflows and Utilize Flow Management Alt 3 Grand Bayou Pump and Utilize Flow Management

Recreation Benefits Model Atchafalaya Conveyance Alternatives Alt 4 Increase Atchafalaya Inflows, Grand Bayou Pump and Utilize Flow Management Alt 5 - Increase Atchafalaya Inflows, and Utilize Grand Bayou Dredging Alt 6 Houma Navigation Lock Management

Unit Day Value Point System General Recreation EGM 10-03 03 Criteria Recreation Experience Availability of Opportunity Carrying Capacity Accessibility Environmental Judgement Factors / Points Number of activities 0-4 5-10 11-16 17-23 24-30 Likelihood of success 0-3 4-6 7-10 11-14 15-18 Facilities' conditions 0-2 3-5 6-8 9-11 12-14 Access to Recreation Site 0-3 4-6 7-10 11-14 15-18 Esthetic Quality 0-2 3-6 7-10 11-15 16-20 Points from the five criteria change over time according to the services provided by the ecosystem and g g p y y the recreational infrastructure

Monetary Benefit Estimations Atchafalaya Conveyance Study Area - Number of Unit Value Days - Year 10 Without Project Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Alternative 5 Alternative 6 Number of Unit Value Days 665,020 665,020 665,020 665,020 665,020 665,020 Study Area General Fishing and Hunting Recreation Points - Year 10 Without Project Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Alternative 5 Alternative 6 Recreation Experience 23 23 23 23 23 23 Availability of Opportunity 14 16 17 16 15 13 Carrying Capacity 10 10 10 10 10 10 Accessibility 11 11 11 11 11 11 Environmental 15 15 16 15 15 14 Total Points 73 75 77 75 74 71 Unit Day Value $9.72 $9.86 $9.99 $9.86 $9.79 $9.59 Total Annual Monetary Value $6,464,657 $6,553,770 $6,642,882 $6,553,770 $6,509,214 $6,375,545

Increased Recreation Benefits Atchafalaya Conveyance ($) Without Project Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Alternative 5 Alternative 6 Net Present Value Annualized Benefit 2,077,000 2,799,000 1,588,000 1,505,000 252,000 190,000 0 102,505 138,137 78,371 74,275 12,437 9,377

Recreation Benefits Model Conclusion A Consistent Method of Measuring Impacts Standardized Values of Recreation Days Annualizes Benefits over Project Period Based Upon National Economic Development (NED) Procedures