OBJECTION BY THE ESSEX LOCAL ACCESS FORUM (ELAF) see also OBJ/142

Similar documents
The Network Rail (Essex and Others) Level Crossing Reduction Order Draft Programme

The Network Rail (Essex and Others) Level Crossing Reduction Order Draft Programme

THE PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL (ESSEX AND OTHERS LEVEL CROSSING REDUCTION) ORDER DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT REFERENCE: TWA/17/APP/05

London Stansted Noise Complaints Analysis Report 2014

Date: 22 September Grove Vale parking consultation. East Dulwich, South Camberwell. Head of Public Realm

All queries and paragraph references, as set out in red below, relate to Mark Brunnen s Proof of Evidence (NR27/1).

PUBLIC INQUIRY APPLICATION BY NEWTWORK RAIL UNDER TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL SUFFOLK LEVEL CROSSING REDUCTION ORDER

APPENDIX 1 LIST OF PLANNING POLICY DOCUMENTS

Pritlewell Station - Mobile Catering Opportunity

A120 BRAINTREE TO A12 Consultation on Route Options. 17 January 14 March 2017

Penalty Fares Scheme. Comments by Transport Focus. Abellio East Anglia Ltd. 16 October Abellio East Anglia Operating Route October 2016

Silk Meadows. A superb collection of two, three, four and five bedroom family homes in Braintree

HS11/HS12 Mk2 Route Loadings

Anglia Winter Key Route Strategy (KRS) 2017/18

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub

Local Development Scheme

Business Case for Sible Hedingham to Sudbury bus service

Ian Saxon Assistant Executive Director, Environmental Services

Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/18/0064/F Great Yarmouth Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:

YOUR SPACE COLCHESTER

TENDRING DISTRICT COUNCIL. Planning Department

commercial office retail WITHAM ESSEX CM8 1FR

IOW Ramblers Submission Paper to the Sept 2016 ROW Improvement Plan Consultation.

HIGHWAYS PANEL held at COUNCIL OFFICES LONDON ROAD SAFFRON WALDEN at 7.00 pm on 29 NOVEMBER 2012

London Stansted Noise Complaints Analysis Report 2015

Procedure for consideration of brown and white tourism signs

Strategic Transport Forum

Wrabness Parish Council

Memorandum of Understanding on Highways & Transportation Infrastructure for the West Essex/East Hertfordshire Housing Market Area

Cuadrilla Elswick Ltd

Scala House, 36 Holloway Circus, Queensway, Birmingham, B1 1EQ

Stage Colchester Tendring Braintree Call for Sites On going Completed August- October December 2016 December February 2017

Appendix A: Summary of findings drawn from an analysis of responses to the questionnaire issued to all households in Trimley St Martin

Minutes of the Cambridgeshire Local Access Forum (LAF) Meeting Held on Tuesday 17 May 2016 at 7 pm at The Monkfield Arms, Cambourne

COLCHESTER LOCAL HIGHWAYS PANEL MINUTES 13 December GRAND JURY ROOM, TOWN HALL, HIGH STREET, COLCHESTER, CO1 1PJ

Rail Delivery Group. Consultation on the future of the East Midlands rail franchise

Putting Havering on the map

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. Housing and Health Committee. 25 May Perth and Kinross Local Housing Strategy

Capital Project Business Case Colchester to Clacton Route Based Strategy

RESPONSE TO AIRPORT EXPANSION CONSULTATION 27 MARCH 2018 Submitted online by Helen Monger, Director

TENDRING DISTRICT COUNCIL WITH ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL HIGHWAY PANEL 29 TH JUNE /18 POTENTIAL SCHEMES LIST

Research Briefing Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management in Wales

BHS ADVICE ON Dimensions of Width, Area and Height

Reference: 06/13/0594/F Parish: Fritton & St Olaves Officer: Mrs M Pieterman Expiry Date:

Bus Passenger News September/October 2016

SE LEP Business Case Executive Summary Colchester ITP

COLCHESTER LOCAL HIGHWAYS PANEL MINUTES AND ACTIONS

Public Document Pack MINUTES OF THE HARLOW LOCAL HIGHWAYS PANEL HELD ON. 16 June pm

Much of the information which follows is included by kind permission of the Tynedale Council (now defunct) and is based on its brochure.

A superbly positioned new development comprising eighteen high specification three, four and five bedroom family homes.

Adoption and Maintenance of Sustainable Drainage Systems in South Cambridgeshire. Council Policy. Published by South Cambridgeshire District Council

BLAIRGOWRIE COMMON GOOD FUND COMMITTEE. 1 May 2013 QUEEN ELIZABETH II FIELDS 2012 CHALLENGE IN PERTH AND KINROSS

Level Crossing Risk Assessment Polegate MCB

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF LITTLE HALLINGBURY PARISH COUNCIL, HELD ON TUESDAY 13 th JANUARY 2015, BEGINNING AT 7.00pm, IN THE VILLAGE HALL ANNEXE.

The environment surrounding Gipsy Lane FPG level crossing consists of town or village etc on one side of the line.

At a meeting of the Development Management Committee held on 22 February 2018

ARDLEIGH PARISH COUNCIL. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL HELD ON 9 th September 2013 AT THE VILLAGE HALL AT 7.30PM

Permitted Development Rights

Regional Meeting of the north east Local Access Forums

The decision on whether to take enforcement action falls outside the scope of delegated powers.

Minutes of the Cambridgeshire Local Access Forum (LAF) Meeting Held on Tuesday 25 November 2014 at 7 pm at Ely Cathedral Centre Present: Members Mary

Display of 13 non-illuminated lamppost advertisement banners

St. Clements C of E Academy, Butlin Street, Birmingham, B7 5NS. Installation of multi-use games area and associated access works.

SUMMARY PROOF OF EVIDENCE. Gerald Kells Transport Policy and Campaigns Advisor

Parish Paths Partnership Manual

Consultation on Draft Airports National Policy Statement: new runway capacity and infrastructure at airports in the South East of England

99/17 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE: Councillor Robert Smillie, Councillor Nigel Tyler, Councillor Sheelagh Pegg.

ECC Report April 2016

LSCC London. Stansted. Cambridge.Consortium

Airport Master Plans

The Network Rail (Suffolk Level Crossing Reduction) Order

Commissioning Director - Environment. Officer Contact Details Jane Shipman;

SELEP Strategic Board. Ashford College 15 th December 2017

Pre-application submission for Committee: Phase 4 development at West Hendon

Paul Griffiths, BEng (Hons), IENG, MCIHT

Business Case Approved. Under Construction. Business Case Approved. Under Construction

Stakeholder News. // 4m service. Welcome from MD, Jamie Burles. improvements. Issue 11 September 2015

LSCC London. Stansted. Cambridge. Consortium

Suffolk Local Access Forum s (SLAF) response to Network Rail s consultation on level crossing closures.

PUBLIC INQUIRY QUESTION

RETTENDON PARISH COUNCIL

The Mayor s draft The London Plan Consultation. Response from the Richmond Heathrow Campaign 2 March 2018

London Stansted Airport Noise Complaints Analysis Report 2016

Re-opening of the Skipton to Colne Railway Executive Summary

PUBLIC CONSULTATION - THE PURPOSE

Living & Working Access and Recreation

Lower Thames Crossing Consultation

Walks and trails. Information Norwich

A21 TONBRIDGE TO PEMBURY DUALLING. Statement of Case

HEAD OF ECONOMIC PROMOTION AND PLANNING Nathan Spilsted, Senior Planning Officer Tel:

Services to Colchester schools

356,500 people commuted to jobs in the City of London. 40 per cent from inner London, 29 per cent from outer London, 31 per cent from outside London

PLANNING AFTER DARK: PAUL SHUKER, DIRECTOR, WYG

16/124 Public participation session with respect to items on the agenda and other matters that are of mutual interest.

Minutes of the Meeting of Great Notley Parish Council Held on Tuesday 26 th April 2016 at the Community Centre Great Notley

TRANSPORT FOR COLCHESTER

Rail Update Station Usage Statistics and Network Rail Performance

Swallow House, 10 Swallow Street, Birmingham, B1 1BD

Isleworth & Brentford Area Forum Action Plan

ALRESFORD PARISH COUNCIL

Transcription:

THE PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL (ESSEX AND OTHERS LEVEL CROSSING REDUCTION) ORDER PUBLIC INQUIRY, 18 OCTOBER 2017 DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT REFERENCE: TWA/17/APP/05 OBJECTION BY THE ESSEX LOCAL ACCESS FORUM (ELAF) see also OBJ/142 PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF KATHERINE EVANS, CHAIR OF THE ESSEX LOCAL ACCESS FORUM (volunteer) OF 64 FEERING HILL, FEERING, COLCHESTER, ESSEX CO5 9NL This Proof of Evidence is one of the two Proofs of Evidence of the Essex Local Access Forum (ELAF) objecting to the Network Rail TWA crossing closure Order. The other ELAF Proof of Evidence is that of Sue Dobson, ELAF Member. A. Introduction Network Rail's document NR 16 Level Crossing Safety Strategy 2015-2040 objectives include (p2) - Working to a time bound framework for making all passive crossings active, providing clear warnings of approaching trains and replacing telephones and whistle boards to reduce the likelihood of human error - Prioritising the elimination of passive crossings on high speed lines and at stations. NR are not working to these objectives in this TWA Order as many of the crossings in this order are NOT on high speed lines. B. Crossings on branch lines with line speeds of 60mph or less 12 of the crossings that NR are proposing to close under this TWA Order are on branch lines with (maximum) line speeds that are the same as or less than the national road speed limit of 60mph. These crossings are listed in Table B. Table B: 12 Crossings on branch lines with line speeds of 60 mph or less Numbe r Crossing name Location Line speed (NR data) ALCRM (NR) Clacton& Harwich branch line E57 Wivenhoe Park Wivenhoe COL 60 mph B4 And ELAF Objection letter OBJ/142 page 1

E41 Padgets Wivenhoe COL 25 mph C4 E47 Bluehouse Walton+Frinton TEN 50 mph D8 E48 Wheatsheaf Wrabness TEN 60 mph D10 E49 Maria Street Harwich TEN 25 mph C3 Sudbury Branch Line E51 Thornfield Wakes Colne & Mount Bures 50 mph D10 Wood COL E52 Golden Square Wakes Colne & Mount Bures 50 mph D10 COL E54 Mount Bures Bures Hamlet BRAIN 50 mph D8 Braintree Branch Line E35 Cranes No1 Cressing BRAIN 50 mph C7 E36 Cranes No2 Cressing & White Notley 50 mph D11 BRAIN E37 Essex Way Cressing & White Notley BRAIN 50 mph C8 Burnham branch line E38 Battlesbridge Rettendon CHEL 50 mph D8 NOTE: LB Havering HA1-HA4 crossings are not included as Havering is geographically no longer part of ECC and so not part of ELAF. London Boroughs are not required to have LAFs (Local Access Forums) The inclusion of these crossings in this TWA Order appears to contradict two of the policies in NR16 Level Crossing Safety Strategy 2015-2040. Two of the crossings are inside more built-up areas - E41 Padgets in Wivenhoe and E49 Maria Street in the Dovercourt area of Harwich. Closing the other 10 crossings removes a route for people to access the countryside on foot and so is against ECC's ROWIP, the CROW Act and NPPF paragraph 75, in section 8 "Promoting healthy communities". There is no evidence that NR have sought to make these 10 passive crossings active. As such, ELAF request that these 10 crossings on these branch lines with line speeds of 60mph or less are removed from this TWA crossing closure Order. And ELAF Objection letter OBJ/142 page 2

C. Crossings on lines with line speeds of 70 and 75 mph 17 of the crossings that NR are proposing to close under this TWA Order are on lines with (maximum) line speeds of between of 70 and 75 mph. These crossings are listed in Tables C1 & C2. B1: Three further crossings on the Clacton branch line Crossings E43, E45 & E46 are also on the Clacton branch line. NR state that the branch line speed at these crossings is 75 mph. NR date shows that line speeds at the crossings that it is proposed to close on this branch line varying from 75 mph down to 25mph. Crossings E45 & E46 in Great Bentley are close to Great Bentley station and the Plough Lane vehicular level crossing. Table C1: 3 crossings on the Clacton branch line with line speeds of 75 mph Number Crossing name Location Line speed ALCRM E43 High Elm Alresford TEN 75 mph C6 E45 & E46 Gt Bentley Station & Lords No1 Gt Bentley TEN 75 mph C6 & C7 There is no evidence that NR have sought to make these three passive foot crossings on this branch line active. Closing these crossings removes a route for people to access the countryside on foot and so is against ECC's ROWIP, the CROW Act and NPPF paragraph 75, in section 8 "Promoting healthy communities". Network Rail have provided no Stage 2 Road Safety Audit data for the proposed alternative road routes. ELAF request that these 3 branch line crossings E43, E45 & E46 are also removed from this TWA crossing closure Order. C2. 12 public crossings on lines with speeds of between 70 and 75 mph 12 public crossings proposed for closure in the TWA Order have NR stated line speeds of 70 and 75 mph at the crossings. Table C2: 12 public crossings on lines with line speeds of 70 and 75 mph (also two private crossings E07 & E12) And ELAF Objection letter OBJ/142 page 3

Number Crossing name Location Line speed ALCRM Secondary lines e.g. C2C E28 Whipps Farmers Brentwood BREN 75 mph B6 E29 Brown & Tawse Brentwood BREN 75 mph C4 E30 & Ferry & Brickyard Farm Benfleet 75 mph C2 E31 E33 Motorbike BAS 70 mph C6 Cambridge Line E05 Fullers End Elsenham UTT 70 mph C6 E06 Elsenham Emergency Hut Elsenham UTT 70 mph M13 (closures) E07 Ugley Lane (private) UTT 70 mph C8 E08 Henham Henham etc UTT 70 mph C6 E09 Elephant Newport UTT 70 mph C6 E10 Dixies Newport UTT 70 mph C6 E11 Windmills Newport etc UT 70 mph C8 E12 Wallaces (private) UTT 70 mph C10 E13 Littlebury Gate House Littlebury UTT 70 mph C5 NOTE: LB Havering HA1-HA4, Thurrock Unitary Authority T01, T04 & T05, Southend Unitary Authority E32 & Hertfordshire H01-H08 crossings are not included as they are geographically no longer part of ECC and so not part of ELAF. There is no evidence that NR have sought to make these passive crossings active. Network Rail have provided no Stage 2 Road Safety Audit data if the proposed alternative routes involve walking on or alongside roads. D. Crossings E01-E04 in the Stort Valley with Open Access & Common Land Crossings E01 - E04 are on the Cambridge Line with a stated (maximum) line speed of 80mph. The line curves and as such the crossings that are still operational are protected by whistle boards. The Essex Local Access Forum request that these crossings are considered as a special case and that they are removed from the TWA Order and dealt with under the Highways Act 1980 Sections 119A and 118A for railway crossings. And ELAF Objection letter OBJ/142 page 4

These crossings are in the area of the Stort Navigation on the Essex / Hertfordshire borders, west and north of Harlow, with the proposed garden community of Harlow North / Gilston Park Estate to the north. As such they provide a local amenity that is used by cyclists and walkers. The long distance routes the Harcamlow Way & Stort Valley Way pass through this area; also the local "Walk on the Wildside" path. Areas of Open Access land (CROW Act), ancient Common Lands and SSSIs are on the north of the line, much of which is in the flood plain. Some of this land is managed by the Essex Wildlife Trust & the Hertfordshire Wildlife Trust. The Stort navigation and the well maintained tow path are also north of the line. Harlow Council own areas of the higher ground to the south of the line, including the golf course land. Some of this area also features in the Harlow Local Plan. On 22 September 2015, the ELAF annual out-of-office meeting explored this area. A presentation was made at the next ELAF meeting on 13 October (Appendix iii presentation). ELAF request that these crossings and this stretch are removed from this TWA Order so that a joined-up and inclusive plan can be developed to improve access and accessibility to this area which has multiple interests, is partially in the flood plain, includes Open Access & Common Land and is used for cattle grazing, which is now quite unusual in Essex where most farming is arable. E. In conclusion There appears to be a tension between some of Network Rail's objectives, some of Network Rail's proposed alternative routes in this TWA crossing closures Order and the duties imposed by the Government on Local Highway Authorities and Local Planning Authorities as regards the protection and improvement of public access and public rights of way. And ELAF Objection letter OBJ/142 page 5

ELAF submits that NR are not following their own strategies and vision for passive level crossings in this TWA crossing closure Order. None of the crossings are at stations and none are on high speed lines, defined by NR those above 100mph. There is no evidence that NR have sought to make these passive crossings active. Network Rail have provided no Stage 2 Road Safety Audit data if the proposed alternative routes involve walking on or alongside roads. ELAF request that when considering whether a proper alternative right of way has been provided by this scheme, as is required by section 5(6) of the Transport and Works Act 1992, ECC's ROWIP, the CROW Act 2000 and NPPF paragraph 75, in section 8 "Promoting healthy communities" are taken into account. ELAF APPENDICES to Proofs 1 and 2: (i) LAF Guidance Booklet, DEFRA 2007 updated 2009 (ii) ECC ROWIP (iii) ELAF presentation: Stort Valley And ELAF Objection letter OBJ/142 page 6