City of Fort Lauderdale. Frequently Asked Questions. Proposed Sea Wall Ordinance

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO. C-16- WHEREAS, the proposed minimum seawall elevation exceeds the current maximum by 0.7 feet (8.4 inches); and

The following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:

DRAFT GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND SPECIFIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MIDDLETON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT MOREY FIELD. Revised 12/12/03

DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF SAND FENCING GARDEN CITY, NORTH LITCHFIELD AND LITCHFIELD BEACH GEORGETOWN COUNTY, SC

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Docket No. CP

ORDINANCE NO. _2013-

5 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing

The Galveston Seawall

Lake Tahoe Shoreline Plan 03 Policy Topic: Access Issues

Project A: Revetment Scale: 1 = 10. 3/7 Revision: Benchmarks. Eroding Parking Area. View from Above. Locklies Creek. Ebb.

SUTTER COUNTY. General Plan Update Technical Background Report

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SILVER SANDS. Municipal Development Plan

Impact of Offshore Directed Forcing on Sediment Transport and Structural Integrity at Packery Channel, Corpus Christi Texas

City of Doral Flood Warning and Response Plan

City of Redding Airports

Airport Master Plan Update June 15, 2017

Airport Master Plan Update June 15, 2017

October 7, 2016 Hurricane Matthew Rakes the East Coast of Flagler County for 18.1 Miles

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Old Town Village Mixed Use Project City of Goleta. MEETING DATE: June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 5M

Community Development

-NOTE: NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION PURPOSES-

A Brief History of the Town of Palm Beach Coastal Protection Program. Beach nourishment occurred in Palm Beach as far back as the 1940s.

URBAN DESIGN REPORT. Proposed Residential Development, Old Church Road, Caledon East

New Orleans Municipal Yacht Harbor

Header i

MORGAN CREEK GREENWAY Final Report APPENDICES

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

M E M O R A N D U M. Status of the Environmental Cleanup of the Shipyard

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Datums Page Page 1 of 5

related to temporary banners, flags, A-frame signs, and other temporary sign devices for commercial advertising. (Lee Plemel,

80' MIN 100'-0" 15'-0" 2 FEDERALLY DREDGED NAVIGATION CHANNEL MEASURED AT EL -10' (NOTE 4) NAVIGATION CHANNEL EXISTING YACHT CLUB FLOATS

Flood History. Floodplain Descriptions

ADDENDUM NO. TWO AB

PLACERVILLE HOTEL INCENTIVE PROGRAM

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation March 25, 2004 SONOMA COUNTY COASTAL TRAIL, PHASE I. File No Project Manager: Richard Retecki


Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Finance and Implementation

VI. ALTERNATIVES TO THE MASTER PLAN C. RENOVATED EAST BUILDING ALTERNATIVE

DARWIN LUXURY HOTEL CONNECTIVITY AND PUBLIC REALM Our concept includes:

New ADA Accessibility Standards for the Attractions Industry

1961 Post-Hurricane Donna Pier Rebuild

DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS and APPLICANT GUIDELINES

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. SUMMARY: Flood hazard determinations, which may include additions or

CITY OF OCEAN SHORES, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 940

APPENDIX D FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS, PART 77

TransAction Overview. Introduction. Vision. NVTA Jurisdictions

The Baker/Carver Regional Trail is intended to

Boise Municipal Code. Chapter DEFINITIONS

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GALVESTON WHARVES Tariff Circular No. 6

Ongoing Projects 3/16/2017 2

Asia Pacific Regional Aviation Safety Team

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

EXHIBIT K TERMINAL PROJECT PROCEDURES PHASE I - DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL PROGRAM & ALTERNATIVES

Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

SUSTAINABLE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY TOURISM IN THE COASTAL ZONES OF THE BALTIC SEA AREA

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Lake Manitou Dam and Spillway Upgrade

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Buffalo Harbor, New York

Town of Oakfield Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

Indian Ocean Small Island States: Indicators of Dangerous Anthropogenic Influences of Climate Change?

AVIATION PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Oakland International Airport 530 Water Street Oakland, CA 94607

Appendix N MAINTENANCE DREDGING STATEMENT OF NEED & PERMIT COMPLIANCE. North Thousand Islands Management Plan Appendices

Recommendations for Funding Water, Sewer and Drainage Systems. Presentation to the Citizens and Businesses of New Orleans January 2012

FUTENMA REPLACEMENT FACILITY BILATERAL EXPERTS STUDY GROUP REPORT. August 31, 2010

PLANNING BOARD MINUTES March 13, 2017 CASCO COMMUNITY CENTER 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Stan Buchanan, Ray Grant & Lynne Potter Bob Barnes, Ted

Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport

AGENDA GUEMES ISLAND FERRY OPERATIONS PUBLIC FORUM

COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORT NASSAU HARBOUR PORT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Nassau Harbour Port Improvement Project

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Kirkcaldy Sea Wall Improvements. Non-technical Summary. For illustration purposes only to give an indicative representation of the scheme.

Appalachian Power Company Smith Mountain Hydroelectric Project FERC No Debris Management Plan

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

PRESS RELEASE. Address: Hungary, H-1068 Budapest, Benczúr utca 25.

Port Everglades Master/Vision Plan Update

4.0 Context for the Crossing Project

PRELIMINARY STAFF PLANNING REPORT TO THE WALWORTH COUNTY ZONING AGENCY X CONDITIONAL USE

** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AERONAUTICS DIVISION CHAPTER LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF AIRPORTS TABLE OF CONTENTS

The implementation of this Master Plan will be undertaken in logical stages to meet passenger and workforce demands.

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

North Cruise Berth Projects PortMiami

Figure 7. Dragline at Cape Coral, Figure 8. Cape Coral oblique aerial photograph, 1959.

F6. Coastal Ferry Terminal Zone

VAR-501-WECC-3 Power System Stabilizer. A. Introduction

INNOVATIVE MARINE DESIGNS PND ENGINEERS, INC. January 14, 2016

P D E C. Establishment of Opening Dates for New Carrollton Yard and College Park and New Carrollton Parking Garages

Public Notice ISSUED: December 10, 2018 EXPIRES: January 9, 2019

MANAGING COASTAL HAZARDS THROUGH BENEFICIAL REUSE OF DREDGED SAND AND AN ADAPTIVE WORKS STRATEGY

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

Transcription:

City of Fort Lauderdale Frequently Asked Questions Proposed Sea Wall Ordinance The City of Fort Lauderdale is considering amending the Unified Land Development Regulations of the City of Fort Lauderdale Section 47-19.3 Boat Slips, Docks, Boat Davits, Hoists, and Similar Mooring Structures. This amendment is intended to improve coastal resilience and mitigate the effects of tidal flooding and sea level rise. 1. What are the major changes in the proposed seawall ordinance? The existing ordinance sets a maximum elevation for all new seawalls at five and one-half (5½) feet above NGVD29, except when the adjacent property is higher than five and one-half (5½) feet above the NGVD29 (3.90 feet NAVD88). The proposed ordinance: Adds definitions for seawall and for North American Vertical Datum (NAVD88); Sets a minimum seawall elevation at 4.6 feet NAVD88 (0.7 feet; 8.4 inches above the current maximum allowable elevation) Sets an allowable maximum height of the seawall based on a property s base flood elevation; Requires seawall reconstruction to the minimum elevation if the substantial repair threshold is triggered; Requires maintaining seawalls in good repair; Addresses fixed and floating docks; and Sets a date by which all seawalls must meet the minimum elevation requirement (March 1, 2035) 2. Why are we changing the ordinance at this time? During September of 2015, the City of Fort Lauderdale experienced a King Tide that was predicted to be 8-10 inches above the average high tide but was observed to be 18-20 inches above the average high tide. The unprecedented flooding resulted in a presentation to the City Commission at the November 3, 2015 Commission Conference Meeting. At that time, the Commission requested that the City revise the seawall ordinance (ULDR Sec. 47-19.3) to set a minimum seawall elevation requirement.

3. Was the height of the September 2015 King Tide an anomaly? What causes the observed tide height to exceed the predicted tides? As shown in the January 2016 graphic below from the Virginia Key Tide Gauge, the observed height of the tides continues to exceed the NOAA tide predictions (green line is higher than the blue line). While the difference between the predicted and observed tidal height varies, there is a continuing pattern that the observed heights are consistently higher by 6-12 inches. If this trend continues, King Tides this fall will again be in the 16-20 inches range above the average predicted high tide for the year. Higher than predicted tides can be the result of a number of phenomena including, but not limited to, easterly winds, the passage of tropic storms and the slowing of the Gulf Stream Current. 4. How did the City determine the minimum seawall elevation of 4.6 feet NAVD? The proposed minimum elevation requirement (4.6 feet NAVD88) is derived from the observed peak elevation of the September 2015 King Tide at NOAA s Lake Worth Tide Gauge plus two (2) feet of additional elevation to address the maximum projected sea level rise expected to occur within the 30-50 year lifespan of a seawall constructed today. 5. What guidance for seawalls are other nearby municipalities using? Lighthouse Point- sets a maximum cap elevation of 6.5 ft NGVD (4.9 NAVD88) Sea Ranch Lakes No height adjustment allowed Lauderdale by the Sea Does not address height Pompano - Seawalls will be erected to be consistent with the elevation of adjacent seawalls. No seawall will exceed 5 feet 10 inches NAVD88. Hallandale Does not set criteria for height Miami Beach - 5.7 feet NAVD88 for public seawalls Hillsborough Beach - Does not set criteria for height

6. Why is the Base Flood Elevation used to set the maximum elevation of the seawall? Base Flood Elevations are provided in the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FEMA FIRM) as whole numbers (e.g. 4, 5, 6). This value was used to set a maximum to ensure that the new seawalls was lower than the finished flood elevation and would not result in grading of the property in a manner that would cause flooding into the home. Property s FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Location In a floodplain with a base flood elevation greater than or equal to 5.0 feet NAVD88 In a floodplain with a base flood elevation equal to 4.0 feet NAVD88 In an X zone, not in a floodplain Minimum Allowable Seawall Elevation Maximum Allowable Seawall Elevation 4.6 feet NAVD88 Base Flood elevation of the property 4.6 feet NAVD88 4.6 feet NAVD88 Base Flood elevation of the property plus one foot (5 feet NAVD88) Meet the definition of grade as determined by Section 47-2.2 (g)(1)(a) 7. What is my Base Flood Elevation and what are the applicable minimum and maximum seawall elevation?

8. Why are we allowing a variety of seawall heights by setting a maximum and minimum? The City previously set a maximum elevation which also allowed for varying heights. Properties at different elevation require seawalls at different elevation to prevent erosion and address drainage issues. Individuals with marine interests also consider seawall height in the context of access to their boats. 9. What counts as a seawall? Are rip rap and coral rock seawalls included in the ordinance? The ordinance defines a seawall as a vertical or near vertical structures placed between an upland area and a waterway. The seawall may be made of any material as long as it is substantially impermeable. For the purposes of Section 47-19.3(f), rip rap is not consider a seawall but traditional coral rock seawalls (coral boulders cemented into a solid wall) meet the definition. The intent of adding the phrase substantially impermeable is to convey that water should not be able to move unimpeded through a seawall. This would include features such as open scuppers, cracks, seams, expansion joints, and poor mortar joints. Water will find its own level and penetrate under and through features until it reaches equilibrium. Seawalls shall be constructed so that water should not flow inland through the above grade section of seawall. 10. Will raising the seawalls worsen flooding caused by stormwater events? The elevated seawalls could prevent overland flow of stormwater. Generally speaking, the City s stormwater management system (drainage infrastructure) is designed to prevent overland flow. One way valves incorporated into the seawall itself is one potential solution to concerns of water pooling on the upland side of a seawall. Please note that this proposed seawall ordinance is one component of an overarching strategy to improve the resiliency of our community to stormwater and tidal flooding. Other efforts being implemented through the City s Stormwater Master Plan, Seawall Master Plan, and Canal Dredging Master Plan will further reduce flooding and complement the seawall ordinance implementation. While elevation of the roadways is another potential tool to address flooding, it finished floor elevations for the existing buildings need to be considered which limits the locations were street elevations could be applied. 11. Will the City canal dredging project impact the soundness of existing seawalls? Should the ordinance indicate building seawalls deeper? The City only dredges the center third of a canal, ensuring it does not dredge within 10 feet of a seawall to ensure it does not negatively impact seawalls. City canal dredging projects will not impact the foundation of existing seawalls. The City canal dredging criteria requires the contractor(s) to maintain all dredging operations 10 feet away from any seawall to prevent any impact to the soils surrounding the seawalls. Dredging activities would not warrant setting seawalls deeper.

12. Will the ordinance make permitting easier? The ordinance does not change the current permitting process. However, the City is currently considering creating standard seawall designs that may be expedited through permitting. 13. Will every seawall (both private and public) have to be raised to the minimum elevation by 2035? That is correct. This is consistent with the City s Fast Forward 2035 Vision goal to have a safe and resilient community. 14. If the stated life of a seawall is 30-50 years, how can we ask homeowners who recently installed a seawall to rebuild it in just 20 years? The majority of seawalls in the City of Fort Lauderdale is currently past their 30-50 year life span or will be past their useful life by 2035. Property owners with seawalls constructed in the near term (e.g. the last five years) are likely to be able to add a cap in the future to meet the minimum height requirements. Adding a cap is about 1/10 th the cost of rebuilding a seawall. 15. Where are the funds going to come from to rebuild the City owned seawalls? How many linear feet of seawall does the City own? Should the proposed ordinance be adopted, the City will have 19 years to incrementally address funding, design and construction of publically-owned seawalls. A variety of funding options could be considered including existing community investment plan funding, special assessments, a seawall utility, future FEMA mitigation funds, a bond measure or increased millage rate on ad valorem property tax. We estimate that the City owns four (4) miles of seawall (~21,000 linear feet). Depending on whether the seawall needs to be raised or replaced the cost in today s dollars could range from $2M-$26M. 16. What is the cost of seawall replacement or repair? Costs will vary by a number of factors including, but not limited to, the depths of the adjacent waterway, the elevation of the property, and construction materials used. The following are estimates only to understand the general magnitude of the costs. Replacement: The cost per linear foot (LF) for a new concrete panel type seawall is approximately $1,230/LF. Repair: e.g. broken/spalled concrete areas in the cap $60 per cubic foot of epoxy mortar Extension: Add a 12 cap to an existing seawall $95 per linear foot

17. I just put in a new seawall at the current maximum elevation of 3.9 NAVD88 (5.5 NGVD29). Will I have to put in a new one by 2035? The proposed elevation requirement applies to all seawalls regardless of age or height. Seawalls constructed to the current code may be able to be capped with an additional 8 inches of concrete or other appropriate material to meet the height requirement for 2035. 18. Does the city, county, state or federal government offer funding for private property owners to raise their seawalls? Not currently. The Federal Emergency Management Agency is considering funding raising seawalls as a form of hazard mitigation. 19. How will the city code officers enforce the requirement to keep seawalls in good repair? The proposed ordinance requires that seawalls are maintained in good repair. A seawall is presumed to be in disrepair if it allows for upland erosion, transfer of material through the seawall or allows tidal waters to flow unimpeded through the seawall, above ground to adjacent properties or public Right-of-Ways such as roads. The good repair criterion does not apply to the height of existing seawalls. Most of the City s code enforcement is complaint driven, a direct result of the observation of one of our code enforcement officers, or associated with targeted sweeps for specific concerns. Areas known for tidal flooding are likely locations for initial enforcement of the maintained in good repair criterion. 20. Can I just add a cap to my existing seawall to meet the elevation requirement when the time comes? That will depend on if the seawall is structurally sound and can bare the additional weight of the cap. 21. What is the substantial repair threshold? If more than percent (50%) of a seawall or more than fifty percent (50%) of its replacement value is damaged, destroyed or removed for any reason, the entire seawall shall be required to meet the new elevation requirement. 22. How are fixed and floating docks impacted by the ordinance? The proposed ordinance allows fixed docks to be built lower than the adjacent seawall. There is no minimum height for a dock. Docks tied to a seawall have a maximum height of no more than seven (7) inches higher than the seawall to which they are attached.

Floating docks must be permitted and must be permanently attached to a marginal dock, finger pier, mooring pilings, or seawall. 23. When are the scheduled public meetings on the proposed ordinance? April 7 April 25 May 3 May 10 May 18 May 23 June 7 June 21 Marine Advisory Board Council of Civic Association Executive Board Commission Conference Council of Civic Association Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Board Public Hearing Sustainability Advisory Board First Public Reading City Commission Second Public Reading City Commission