Comparison of the Novel ColiPlate

Similar documents
Comparison of Gelman and Millipore Membrane Filters for Enumerating Fecal Coliform Bacteria

COLILERT - WHAT'S AL THE FUSS ABOUT? Elizabeth Hanko. Elizabeth Hanko, Senior Consultant. AWT, Victoria

Gently apply pressure on spreader to distribute over circular area. Do not twist or slide the spreader. Interpretation

Addressing challenges associated with the detection of faecal coliform organisms in water matrices. Neil Leat Rand Water Date 30/09/2014

GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE

Detection of Total Coliforms, Escherichia coli, and

IDEXX Summary. D P Sartory and C Allaert Vandevenne

Gas Chromatographic Presumptive Test for Coliform Bacteria in Water

3M TM Petrifilm TM. Petrifilm TM 3M TM. 3M TM Petrifilm TM Serie 2000 Rapid Coliform Count Plates - Ref.: / 50 Unit - Ref.

REC. Interpretation Guide. Rapid E. coli/coliform Count Plate

NordVal International / NMKL c/o Norwegian Veterinary Institute PB 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway

Bacterial Interference with Coliform Colony Sheen Production on

Pr oject Summar y. Survey of the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on the surface of subprimal cuts of beef during winter months (Phase I)

Petrifilm. Interpretation Guide. Coliform Count Plate. Brand

INTERPRETATION GUIDE AN INTRODUCTION TO USE AND INTERPRETING RESULTS FOR PEEL PLATE CC TESTS. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT CHARM SCIENCES

Interpretation Guide. Coliform Count Plate

INTERPRETATION GUIDE AN INTRODUCTION TO USE AND INTERPRETING RESULTS FOR PEEL PLATE EC TESTS. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT CHARM SCIENCES

Kit Information 3. Sample Preparation 4. Procedure 4. Analysis of Results 5. Quality Control 6. Disposal 6. Technical Support 6. Order Information 6

TOTAL COLIFORM ANDE.coli INDICATOR BACTERIA TEST KIT UV

HSCC. Interpretation Guide. High-Sensitivity Coliform Count Plate

Enumeration of Total Coliforms

Chromocult Coliform Agar acc. ISO

Interpretation Guide 3M Petrifilm Rapid Coliform Count Plates

There are 7 kinds of unique dry medium for hygienic testing and detection of food poisoning bacteria.

Injured Coliforms in Drinking Water

Bacterial Quality of Crystalline Rock and Glacial Aquifers in New England

Optimum Membrane Structures for Growth of Coliform and Fecal Coliform Organisms

Interpretation Guide

Colilert * -18 A faster, easier way to test for total coliforms and E. coli

Bacteriological testing of water

Food Microbiological Examination: Enumeration of Coliforms

COLIFORM BROTH. Fecal Coliform Broth. M-FC BROTH without ROSOLIC ACID (Blue background)

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation BSK Associates Vancouver

Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring for the Sleepy Creek Watershed Incremental 319 Project Final Report

Interpretation Guide

Drinking Water Microbiology 2010:2, September

Comparison of Nine Brands of Membrane Filter and the

Confirmation Protocol for E. coli O157:H7

Sterile Technique TEACHER S MANUAL AND STUDENT GUIDE

Convenient Media Solutions For food and water testing

The Microbiological Survey of Potential Water Borne Pathogens in Fresh Water Springs of the Selected Community Located in the Upolu Island, Samoa

Coliform Count. Interpretation Guide. 3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Coliform Count Plate

No Longer Fond of the Local Pond

Evaluation copy. Fecal Coliform. Computer INTRODUCTION

E. coli and Coliform Bacteria Levels of Edgewood s Watershed Katie Schneider and Leslie Reed

Coliforms as Indicator of Faecal Pollution

Core practical 13: Isolate an individual species from a mixed culture of bacteria using streak plating

Holding Effects on Coliform Enumeration in Drinking

Proficiency Testing FINAL REPORT Check sample program 16CSP02 February 2016

A Study of the Role of Air-borne Particulates as the Cause of Unexplained Coliform Contamination in Drilled Wells.

Bacterial Occurrence in Kitchen Hand Towels

3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Plates and 3M Petrifilm Plate Reader

VALIDATION OF DRY-AGING AS AN EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION STEP AGAINST ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7

Protecting Consumers. Improving lab efficiency. 3M Petrifilm Plates and Reader

Laboratories & Consulting Group

California Leafy Greens Research Board Final Report April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009

Proficiency Testing. Drinking Water Microbiology. September Tommy Šlapokas NFA PT

Serial Disinfection with Heat and Chlorine To Reduce Microorganism Populations on Poultry Transport Containers

3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Plates and Reader. Simply. Prompt. Precise. Productive.

Influence of Diluents, Media, and Membrane Filters on Detection of Injured Waterborne Coliform Bacteria

Pathogenic Naegleria from Thermal Springs

LAKE HURON BEACH STUDY

BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING 109 TRAINING COURSE $ HOUR RUSH ORDER PROCESSING FEE ADDITIONAL $50.00

MICROBIAL ANALYSIS OF RAW AND BOILED MILK SOLD AT BARATON CENTER IN NANDI COUNTY, KENYA

FINAL Water Year 2012 Bacteria Sampling Report for the Klamath River Estuary

sources of the coliform bacteria in the lake Bohinjsko jezero

Systems. have been made previously to examine the interrelationship

Coliform Species Recovered from Untreated Surface Water

Issue Date: March 1, M Petrifilm Plates Certifications, Recognitions and Validations

r., C D C5,) -I2ET dun 241,%3 Sco C)6 C-.) TISIA TECHNICAL DOCUMENTARY REPORT AAL-TDR-6Z-55 AAL- TDR-62-55

Productivity. Technician. Maximized. Interpretation Guide

CITY OF LYNDEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT MARCH 1, 2016

BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION OF WATER WELLS AND SPRINGS

Occurrence of Non-O1/Non-O139 Vibrio Cholerae and Aeromonas Spp. in Arizona Recreational Waters

Kit Information 4 Introduction. 4 Kit Contents, Storage, and Testing Conditions. 4 Equipment Needed. 4 Applicability. 4 Precautions... 4.

TACWA September Meeting CHALLENGES IN MEETING THE TEXAS BACTERIAL LIMITS WITH UV ALONG THE COAST AND BAYS. Gennady Boksiner, P.E. September 30, 2011

Evaluation of Membrane Filters for the Determination of Numbers of Coliform Bacteria in Waterl

Project Summary. Principal Investigators: Lawrence D. Goodridge 1 ; Phil Crandall 2, and Steven Ricke 2. Study Completed 2010

Overview of Microbial Indicator Monitoring Lab Methods. Jim Ferretti, USEPA Region 2 DESA, Laboratory Branch May 23, 2018

Food Stamp Hygiene control on food and food Environment

Water Quality Trends for Conscience Bay

Project Summary. Principal Investigators: Chance Brooks, Mindy Brashears, Mark Miller, Alejandro Echeverry, and Cassandra Chancey

Loyalsock Creek Bacterial Coliforms. Presented By: Dr. Mel Zimmerman Clean Water Institute Lycoming College Matthew Bennett Jim Rogers

high performance pipettors Excellence and precision for all your liquid handling procedures.

Changes in Surviving E.coli, Coliform Bacteria and General Bacteria in Manure with Air Drying Treatment

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Evaluation of the COLI-BART system, a novel method for the quantitative detection of total and fecal coliform bacteria in water.

Sampling for Microbial Analysis

Proficiency Testing. Drinking Water Microbiology. March by Tommy Šlapokas NFA PT

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

Pr oject Summar y. Impact of ground beef packaging systems and temperature abuse on the safety of ground beef

- *".' , / SI'UDIES ON BA4CrrERIAL INDICATORS OF IN DKINKING WA'I'EK

Temperature affects the silicate morphology in a diatom

User friendly microbial detection! Sanita-kun R =The ready-to-use cultural medium sheet for the microbial detection =

Operational safety of urine diversion toilets in Durban, South Africa

Comparison of Enterococci and Coliform Microorganisms in

FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING IN GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY: SUMMARY REPORT OF MONITORING RESULTS FOR

Food Stamp Hygiene control on food and food environment

The Mercer Island E. coli Event PNWS AWWA Spring Conference Bellevue Washington 2015

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

Transcription:

Comparison of the Novel ColiPlate TM Kit and the Standard Membrane Filter Technique for Enumerating Total Coliforms and Escherichia coli Bacteria in Water Ran Lifshitz, 1 Renu Joshi 2 1 Environmental Biodetection Products Inc., Brampton, ON, Canada 2 York-Durham Regional Environmental Laboratory, Pickering, ON, Canada Accepted 20 June 1997 ABSTRACT: The new ColiPlate (CP) kit was evaluated comparatively with the standard membrane filter (MF) technique for enumerating total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water. In testing natural water samples, good correlations were observed for enumerating total coliforms (R 2 = 0.84) and E. coli (R 2 = 0.95). However, counts of E. coli population density estimated by CP were 47% higher than counts estimated by MF. With the water samples spiked with culture-grown E. coli cells, the correlation between the methods was strong for both total coliforms (R 2 = 0.95) and for E. coli (R 2 = 0.94). E. coli densities were estimated to be 20% higher using CP compared with MF. Samples spiked with rehydrated freeze-dried E. coli cells (with high portion of injured or weakened cells) showed a strong correlation between the two methods (R 2 = 0.93, for either total coliforms or E. coli). However, estimated total coliforms and E. coli densities were higher by CP than MF counts (38 and 168%, respectively). The CP test is therefore considered a more reliable method than the traditional MF for enumerating E. coli in samples with high levels of injured or weakened cells. 1998 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 13: 157-164, 1998. Keywords: coliforms; E. coli; membrane filter; ColiPlate; MPN INTRODUCTION Currently, the membrane filter (MF) technique, as described in Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater [American Public Health Association (APHA), 1995] is routinely used worldwide to quantify density of coliforms and E. coli in water and wastewater. The popular MF 24-h test is considered highly reproducible and yields quantitative results more rapidly and less costly than the alternative multiple-tube fermentation (MTF) procedure. Recently, commercial kits, ColiPlate TM and Colilert Quanti-tray TM, have been developed for quantifying total coliforms and E. coli in water. These kits are based on the MTF principle, but are considerably more convenient to use than either traditional MTF or MF techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the new ColiPlate TM test comparatively with the standard MF test using natural water samples as well as sterile water samples spiked with pure E. coli culture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Natural Samples Seventy-three water samples were collected from water treatment plants' intakes and water pollution control plants' final effluents during August and September 1996 in the York-Durham region, Ontario, Canada. Selection of sample sites was based on previous bacteriological data to provide a wide range of counts. Samples were collected in 300 ml sterile plastic bottles containing 300 mg sodium thiosulfate and were immediately placed on ice in coolers for transport. All samples were analyzed on the same day as collected. Preparation of Spiked Samples Suspensions of E. coli strain ATCC 13706 were prepared from either culture-grown cells or from freezedried cells. Cultured bacteria grown in LB medium (Difco) at 35 C overnight resulted in approximately 2x10 7 cfu/ml. Freeze-dried bacteria were prepared according to Reinhartz et al. (1987). Freeze-dried bacteria were rehydrated in 10 ml cold sterile distilled water, resulting in a final concentration of approximately 2.5x10 8 cfu/ml. Bacterial suspensions were diluted in sterile tap water and mixed in 300 ml aliquots of sterile tap water at different concentrations for the comparative analyses. Membrane Filter (MF) Procedure The procedure was performed as described in the Standard Methods (APHA, 1995, Section 9222). Aliquots of 100 ml water sample or sample dilution were filtered through a 4.5 cm diameter and 0.45 µm pore size nitrocellulose membrane (Gelman, Canada). Membranes were then placed on m-endo-les agar for total coliform enumeration and on m-fc-bcig agar for E. coli enumeration (Ciebin et al., 1995). Growth media were obtained from Difco Laboratories (Michigan, IL). Chromogenic substrate 5-bromo-6-chloro-3- indolyl-ß-d-glucuronide (BCIG) was obtained from Diagnostic Chemicals Ltd. (Charlottetown, PEI, Canada). Coliform colonies were determined based on red color and gold metallic sheen observed after 24 h incubation at 35 C on m-endo-les agar. E. coli were identified by a blue color after 24 h incubation at 44.5 C on m-fc-bcig arar. ColiPlate (CP) Procedure ColiPlate TM kits were obtained from Environmental Biodetection Products Inc. (Brampton, Ontario, Canada) and were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The kit is based on a standard 96-well microtiter plate, whereby each well is coated with soluble specialized medium (Ossmer, 1993). For each sample, 200 µl aliquots were dispensed to all wells using a multichannel pipettor. Plates were then covered and incubated at 35 C for 24 h. Total coliform were enumerated based on the number of wells that turned blue. E. coli density was determined based on the number of wells that turned blue and fluoresced under long-wave UV light (366 nm). Most-probable-number (MPN) cell density values were estimated from the number of wells giving positive reaction, based on Thomas' model (APHA, 1995; Thomas, 1942). RESULTS Comparison of the CP and MF Methods for Enumerating Total Coliforms and E. coli in Environmental Water Samples Of the 73 natural water samples analyzed, 61 (84%) and 40 (55%) samples were found to be positive for total coliform and for E. coli, respectively, by either one or both test methods. Counts in these samples ranged from a few to over 1900 total coliform and 400 E. coli cells per 100 ml, respectively. A comparison between the two methods in enumerating total coliform is shown in Fig. 1. Linear regression analysis resulted in a correlation coefficient (R 2 ) value of 0.8366 (p <0.05) and a slope (y) value of 1.0898. Estimated E. coli counts between the methods were even more strongly correlated (R 2 = 0.9539, p <0.01). However, the linear regression slope value of 1.4678 (Fig. 2) indicated a significant bias of higher E. coli counts obtained by the CP method compared with the MF method (p <0.01). To determine possible reasons for this observed discrepancy between the two test methods, two controlled laboratory experiments were performed using sterile tap water samples inoculated with different densities of E. coli (strain ATCC 13076). In one experiment, sterile tap water samples were spiked with organisms grown overnight in nutrient broth, presumably with relatively few injured or weakened cells. In the other experiment, sterile tap water samples were spiked with rehydrated freeze-dried cells, presumably with relatively high levels of injured or weakened cells. All samples were split and analyzed comparatively by the CP and MF methods for total coliform and E. coli. Comparison of the CP and MF Methods for Enumerating Total Coliform and E. coli in Water Spiked with E. coli Culture Counts of total coliform and E. coli in 25 samples ranged from nondetectable to 1200 cells per 100 ml (Figs. 3 and 4). Correlation coefficients between the

two methods were strong for both total coliform (R 2 = 0.9501, p <0.01) and for E. coli (R 2 = 0.9427, p <0.01). Counts of total coliform density did not differ significantly between the methods (slope = 1.0483). However, counts of E. coli density obtained by the CP method were 19.9% higher than counts obtained by MF (Fig.4). With the CP method, counts of total coliform in these samples were always identical to E. coli. However, with the MF method, while counts of E. coli correlated very strongly to total coliform counts (R 2 = 0.9888, Fig. 5), 13.3% of the E. coli cells which were detected as coliform were not identified as E. coli. Comparison of the CP and MF Methods for Enumerating Total Coliform and E. coli in Water Spiked with Rehydrated Lyophilized (Freeze-Dried) E. coli Cells Counts of total coliform and E. coli in 17 spiked samples ranged from non-detectable to 3400 cells per 100 ml (Figs. 7 and 6). Correlation coefficients between the two methods were strong for both total coliform (R 2 = 0.9344, p <0.01) and for E. coli (R 2 = 0.9349, p <0.01). Counts of total coliform and E. coli differed significantly between the methods. Total coliform and E. coli densities estimated by CP were 37.91 and 168.17% higher, respectively, than values estimated by MF. In addition, with the CP method, counts of total coliforms in these samples were always identical to E. coli. In comparisons between counts of E. coli vs. total coliform obtained by MF, there was a very strong correlation between coliform and E. coli counts (R 2 = 0.9879, p <0.01, Fig. 8). However, over 48% of the E. coli cells, which were detected by MF as coliforms, were not detected by the MF method as E. coli. DISCUSSION This study compared the new ColiPlate TM (CP) kit with the standard membrane filter (MF) method for quantifying total coliforms and E. coli in water. The comparative analysis of E. coli density in natural water samples revealed that while there was a strong correlation between the two methods, considerably higher counts were determined by CP. There are several possible

explanations for the discrepancy between the two techniques: (i) A purely mathematical overestimation in calculating the MPN values, perhaps based on erroneous assumptions. However, estimating total coliforms in natural water samples, as well as in water artificially spiked with pure culture-grown cells resulted in similar counts between the two methods. Therefore, the observed discrepancies were not likely caused by a mathematical error in calculation, but were rather due to differential biological characteristics of cells and the methods of enumeration. (ii) Failure of the MF technique to recover injured or weakened cells. This study has shown that considerably lower counts (ca. 38%) of total coliforms were obtained by MF, compared with the CP method, in samples spiked with highly stressed (previously freeze-dried) cells of E. coli. This is consistent with previous studies that reported lower sensitivity of MF in reviving stressed coliforms compared with the multiple fermentation tube method (Bissonette et al., 1975; Jacobs et al., 1986; Shipe and Cameron, 1954). (iii) Further failure of the MF technique to detect stressed E. coli even when the cells are recoverable as coliforms. Evidently, in this study the MF failed to detect ca. 48% of the E. coli population, compared with counts obtained by MF for total coliform (Fig. 8). These observations suggest that conditions for growth and phenotypic expression of injured or weakened E. coli cells are considerably more conducive under the CP procedure than under the popular MF method. Our results are consistent with a recent study conducted by G.E. Horsnell (Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy, unpublished data), which compared the MF method with the Colilert Quanti-trayTM method (which like CP is also based on the multiple fermentation tube principle) for enumerating E. coli in surface water. His study shows a strong linear correlation (R 2 = 0.90) between the two methods, but with 32% higher counts by the Quanti-tray method. In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that the sensitivity of the CP test for enumerating coliforms and E. coli in water is comparable or superior to the

standard membrane filter technique. The CP method is particularly more reliable than MF in detecting injured or weakened E. coli cells. Since the CP test is also more convenient to perform (i.e., the kit is ready to use, easy to perform, and requires no sample dilution), it offers an attractive alternative to the traditional MF technique The authors would like to thank Jamie Gillespie for his technical assistance in performing microbiological analyses. REFERENCES American Public Health Association. 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Inc., Washington, D.C. Bissonette, G.K., J.J. Jezeski, G.A. McFeters, and D.G. Stuart. 1975. Influence of environmental stress on enumeration of indicator bacteria from natural waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 29:186-194. Ciebin, B.C., M.H. Brodsky, R. Eddington, G. Horsnell, A. Choney, G. Palmateer, A. Ley, R. Joshi, and G. Shears. 1995. Comparative evaluation of modified m-fc and m- TEC media for membrane filter enumeration of Escherichia coli in water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3940-3942. Jacobs, N.J., W.L. Zeigler, F.C. Reid, T.A. Stukel, and E.W. Rice. 1986. Comparison of membrane filter, multiple-fermentation-tube, and presence-absence techniques for detecting total coliforms in small community water systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51:1007-1012. Ossmer, R. 1993. Simultaneous detection of total coliforms and E. coli-flurocult LMX broth. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Symposium on Food Microbiology and Hygiene, Bingen, Germany, August 31-September 3, 1993. Reinhartz, A., I. Lampert, M. Herzberg, and F. Fish. 1987. A new short term sensitive bacterial assay kit for detection of toxicants. Toxic. Assess. 2:193-206. Shipe, E.L., and G.M. Cameron. 1954. A comparison of the membrane filter with the most probable number method for coliform determinations from several waters. Appl. Microbiol. 2:85-88. Thomas, H.A., Jr. 1942. Bacteria densities from fermentation tube tests. J. Amer. Water Works Assoc. 572-576.