Deprivation in Wiltshire

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Deprivation in Wiltshire"

Transcription

1 Deprivation in Wiltshire Indices of Deprivation 2010 June 2011 Maggie Rae, Director of Public Health and Public Protection Services

2 Report Author: Dr Sally Hunter, with grateful thanks to Simon Hodsdon Knowledge Management Team, Wiltshire Council For more information please contact: Tel

3 Deprivation in Wiltshire: Indices of Deprivation 2010 Executive Summary 1. The government, through the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), has produced a set of data to aid the assessment of relative levels of deprivation across : The English Indices of Deprivation 2010 (ID 2010). The Indices provide scores and ranks for all 32,482 Lower Level Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in for seven domains of deprivation and for a combined Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The seven domains are: Income; Employment; Health Deprivation and Disability; Education, Skills and Training; Barriers to Housing and Services; Crime, and; Living Environment. The LSOAs are ranked with 1 being the most deprived and 32,483 being the least. This data updates previous Indices for 2004 and The average IMD rank for Wiltshire s LSOAs in the ID 2010 is 22,229, therefore comparing favourably against the benchmark in terms of overall deprivation. However, the county has seen an increase in relative deprivation since the 2007 Indices, as shown by the decrease in this average rank. 3. The highest levels of relative deprivation in Wiltshire relate to Barriers to Housing and Services, reflecting the rural nature of the county, and Education, Skills and Training. 4. As well as the overall IMD, all but one of the deprivation domains show an increase in relative deprivation in Wiltshire from the ID 2004 to ID 2010 compared to the benchmark. The largest relative increases in deprivation are recorded in the Crime; Health Deprivation and Disability and; Living Environment domains. The Barriers to Housing and Services domain saw a relative decrease in deprivation from ID 2004 to ID The average overall IMD rank for Wiltshire s 10% most severely deprived LSOAs is 8,730, substantially below the average for the county as a whole. The average rank in Wiltshire s 10% least deprived LSOAs is 31,303 making these among the least deprived areas in. 6. For the first time, Wiltshire now has one LSOA in the 10% most severely deprived in ; Salisbury St Martin central. This area is also now in the 10% most deprived in with regards to Health Deprivation and Disability; again, this is the first time that Wiltshire has had an LSOA in this category.

4 Deprivation in Wiltshire: Indices of Deprivation The ID 2010 indicates that the total number of income deprived people in Wiltshire is around 39,100. This figure has increased substantially from 6.9% of the total population in the ID 2004 to 8.6% of the total population in the ID The majority of this increase took place between the ID 2004 and ID There has been only a small increase in the size of the income deprived child population. However, the income deprived older people population has seen a large proportional increase from around 9.1% of the 60 plus population in Wiltshire in the ID 2004 to around 12.1% in the ID Wiltshire s employment deprived population stands at around 16,600 people in the ID 2010 data; with a moderate increase of around 2,200 people from the ID Unlike the income deprived population, the majority of this increase occurred between the ID 2007 and ID 2010; a time period that included the start of the economic downturn (with the ID 2010 being mainly based on data from 2008). Even taking the onset of recession into account, the decrease in Wiltshire s average rank for the Employment domain indicates that this increasing employment deprivation is significant. 9. Seven of the 10% most severely deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire are found in Salisbury Community Area; five in Chippenham; four in Trowbridge; three in Devizes and two in Melksham. Of rural parts of the county, the north and west appear generally less deprived when compared to south and east. In addition; a. Trowbridge Community Area has the highest number of LSOAs in the 10% most deprived for the Crime domain (seven), even though it has only four in the most deprived for overall deprivation; b. The most prominent form of deprivation in Westbury Community Area appears to be Income deprivation, with three LSOAs in the 10% most deprived for this domain compared to a maximum of only one for the other domains; c. Deprivation with regards to Education, Skills and Training is relatively evenly distributed, with four LSOAs in the 10% most deprived in each of Salisbury, Trowbridge and Melksham Community Areas, with this being the most prominent form of deprivation in the Melksham area; d. For the Health Deprivation and Disability domain, four of the five most deprived LSOAs in the county are located in the Salisbury Community Area.

5 Deprivation in Wiltshire: Indices of Deprivation Bowerhill south in Melksham Community Area has seen the largest positive change in IMD rank from the ID 2004 to ID 2010 followed by Calne Lickhill north, both presumably relating to changes in housing mix. Chippenham Community Area contains the highest number of LSOAs that have seen the largest positive changes in Wiltshire for national IMD rank, including the whole of the Pewsham estate area and number of areas in the west of the town. Trowbridge Community Area has the second highest number of LSOAs that have seen the largest positive changes in Wiltshire, followed by Calne Community Area. 11. The Ludgershall east and Faberstown and Ludgershall north LSOAs in Tidworth Community Area have seen the largest negative changes in national IMD rank, followed by the Devizes East - north and Chippenham Redland north LSOAs. Chippenham Community Area has the highest number of LSOAs in the county that have seen the largest negative change in national IMD rank followed by Salisbury Community Area; with these areas being mainly located in central parts of the towns. 12. The key message to take from this new dataset is that while Wiltshire still reflects favourably against the national picture with regards to deprivation, the county is becoming relatively more deprived in relation to all deprivation domains with the exception of Barriers to Housing and Services. Associated with this increase in relative deprivation, Wiltshire now for the first time has one area in the 10% most severely deprived in with regards to overall deprivation: Salisbury St Martin central. 13. A further key message to be taken from this data is that while the size of Wiltshire s employment deprived population 1 has increased mainly as a result of the recession, the county s decreasing national rank with regards to employment deprivation indicates that Wiltshire has other issues that are increasing employment and other forms deprivation relatively compared to the benchmark. This is particularly highlighted by the increasing size of Wiltshire s income deprived population 2 prior to the onset of the recession. 1 Which includes those on Incapacity Benefit, Employment and Support Allowance and Severe Disablement Allowance, as well as recipients of Jobseekers Allowance and participants in the New Deal. 2 Which includes adults and children in Income Support households; income-based JSA households; Pension Credit (Guarantee) households; Working Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit households with income below 60% median before housing costs and; subsistence and/or accommodations supported asylum seekers.

6

7 Contents 1. Introduction Deprivation in Wiltshire County County Average Ranks: Benchmarking Deprivation in Wiltshire Relative Deprivation in Wiltshire s Most and Least Deprived Areas Number of Wiltshire Areas among the Most Severely Deprived in Wiltshire s Income and Employment Deprived Populations Local Variations in Deprivation Wiltshire s Most Severely Deprived Areas Areas with Significant Changes Key Messages Appendix 1. Composition of and Changes to the Deprivation Domains Appendix 2. Wiltshire s LSOAs Appendix 3. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the overall IMD Appendix 4. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Income Domain Appendix 5. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Employment Domain Appendix 6. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Health Deprivation and Disability Domain Appendix 7. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Education, Skills and Training Domain Appendix 8. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Barriers to Housing and Services Domain Appendix 9. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Crime and Disorder Domain.. 49 Appendix % Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Living Environment Domain. 50 Appendix % Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index Appendix % Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index Appendix 13. Local Variations in IDACI and IDAOPI Rank Appendix 14. Local Distribution of Wiltshire s Income and Employment Deprived Populations... 55

8

9 1. Introduction 1 1. Introduction The government, through the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), has produced a set of data to aid the assessment of levels of deprivation across : The English Indices of Deprivation (ID 2010). This assessment is used extensively by government and others to assess relative needs and to influence resource allocation: The Indices are central to the evidence base for regeneration policy in and help target limited resources appropriately. As a composite index, the Index of Multiple Deprivation fits well with moves from Government to take a holistic approach to developing local services. The fact that the Indices cover a range of domains means that they will also be useful to local communities as they drive forward policies in their own way to address their own local priorities. The Indices also allows communities to compare their areas with similar, or nearby, areas on a range of nationally consistent measures. This helps residents to gauge their relative levels of deprivation, assess whether progress is being made and hold relevant authorities accountable. The English Indices of Deprivation 2010, DCLG. While Wiltshire is considered to be relatively prosperous, there are pockets of deprivation that are often hidden in official statistics. The ID 2010 goes some way in identifying where deprivation exists in Wiltshire and in measuring its severity. The ranking system used in the Indices allows a comparison to be made of deprivation levels within Wiltshire, as well as comparison of Wiltshire against the rest of. The ID 2010 is an update of previous indices for 2007 (ID 2007) and 2004 (ID 2004), and like these, has been created using the Lower Level Super Output Area (LSOA) geography 4. The Indices are measures of deprivation for every LSOA and local authority area in. They combine a number of indicators that cover a range of different forms of The LSOAs geography was created by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) because other geographies, with varying areas and populations, were considered inconsistent and subject to change. LSOAs are to remain constant and are constrained to have consistent populations of between 1,000 and 3,000, averaging 1,500. This stable geography allows consistent time series analysis and fair comparison between areas. LSOAs define smaller areas than wards and therefore more likely to highlight smaller pockets of deprivation. However, deprived pockets in the geographically large rural LSOAs can easily be overlooked.

10 1. Introduction 2 deprivation, or domains, into a single deprivation score for each area: the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The deprivation domains are listed below, together with their weightings used in calculating the combined IMD: Income Deprivation: 22.5% Employment Deprivation: 22.5% Health Deprivation and Disability: 13.5% Education, Skills & Training Deprivation: 13.5% Barriers to Housing & Services: 9.3% Crime: 9.3% Living Environment Deprivation: 9.3% Supplementary domains are also derived for income deprivation affecting children and income deprivation affecting older people. A detailed description of all of the domains, and the indicators used in calculating them, can be found in Appendix 1 of this report. Some measures within the different domains have been altered or replaced over the years from the ID 2004 and ID 2007 and a detailed breakdown of these changes can also be found in this appendix. It should be noted that in most cases, the data used to produce the indicators in the ID 2010 relates to Similarly, the data used to generate the ID 2007 mainly relates to 2005 and that for the ID 2004 relates mainly to 2001 and 2002/3. The full dataset for the ID 2010 for Wiltshire can be found online via the Intelligence Network at: There are 32,482 LSOAs in and within the Indices of Deprivation they are ranked so that the most deprived LSOA is numbered 1 and the least deprived is numbered 32,482. So, when for example Warminster East Boreham has an overall index of 13,237 it means that it is the 13,237th most deprived LSOA in. There are 281 LSOAs in Wiltshire, which are mapped and listed in Appendix

11 1. Introduction 3 The following sections of this report contain an overview of: Relative deprivation within Wiltshire against as a benchmark; Levels of relative deprivation within Wiltshire s most and least deprived areas; The number of Wiltshire areas among the most severely deprived in ; The size of Wiltshire s income and employment deprived populations and the changes in these over time; The locations of Wiltshire s most severely deprived areas, and; The areas in Wiltshire that have seen the most significant changes in relative deprivation.

12 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 4 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 2.1. County Average Ranks: Benchmarking Deprivation in Wiltshire In order to compare deprivation in Wiltshire against a national benchmark, the average rank of all of the LSOAs in Wiltshire has been calculated for each of the deprivation domains (Table 2.1). As set out above, there are 32,482 LSOAs in, with a rank of 1 indicating the most deprived and 32,482 the least deprived. The average rank for the overall measure of deprivation (IMD) in Wiltshire for the ID 2010 is 22,229, with Wiltshire therefore reflecting favourably against as a whole. However, while the IMD average rank increased slightly from the ID 2004 to ID 2007 (reflecting a small relative decrease in deprivation) the average rank in the ID 2010 is lower than in either 2004 or 2007, reflecting a relative increase in deprivation. Average Rank ID 2004 Average Rank ID 2007 Change ID Average Rank ID 2010 Change ID Change ID Overall IMD 23,515 23, ,229-1,584-1, Income 22,398 21, , Income Deprivation Affecting Children 21,406 21, , Income Deprivation Affecting Older People 23,222 22,108-1,113 22, Employment 24,147 23, ,304-1,531-1, Health Deprivation & Disability 25,150 24, ,015-1,329-2, Education, Skills & Training 19,931 19, , , Barriers to Housing & Services 12,245 16,698 4,453 14,401-2,297 2, Crime 26,115 28,030 1,915 23,734-4,296-2, Living Environment 23,888 22,223-1,666 21, ,087 Table 2.1. Wiltshire County LSOAs: Average Indices of Deprivation Ranks for the ID 2004; ID 2007 and; ID 2010.

13 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 5 Of the seven primary domains making up the overall IMD, the average ranks are mostly in a similar range to that for the overall average IMD: Income 21,551; Employment 22,265; Health Deprivation and Disability 23,015; Crime 23,734 and; Living Environment 21,802. However, the average ranks for the Barriers to Housing and Services and Education, Skills and Training domains are somewhat lower at 14,401 and 18,884 respectively, reflecting relatively higher levels of deprivation in these domains. Wiltshire s relatively high level of deprivation with regards to Barriers to Housing and Services is due to the rural nature of the county meaning that barriers to housing (mainly high house prices) and services are inevitably greater than in more populous areas. The Education, Skills and Training domain is composed of two sub-domains the Children and Young People sub-domain, relating to educational achievement and participation; and the Skills sub-domain, which reflects workforce qualification levels and is based on the 2001 Census. The average rank within the Children and Young People sub-domain is lower at 17,805 compared to 19,473 for the Skills sub-domain. All but one of the seven primary deprivation domains (Barriers to Housing and Services) have seen a decrease in average rank from ID 2004 to ID 2010, reflecting an increase in relative deprivation (Table 2.1. and Figure 2.1). The degree of change is generally fairly small, with the greatest decreases in average rank in the Crime; Health Deprivation and Disability and; Living Environment domains. The smallest degree of change in average rank has been within the Income domain, as well as in the supplementary Income Deprivation Affecting Children (IDACI) and Income Deprivation Affecting Older People (IDAOPI) indices, with the IDACI average rank remaining almost static.

14 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 6 Increasing relative deprivation Figure 2.1. Wiltshire County LSOAs: Average Indices of Deprivation Ranks for the ID 2004; ID 2007 and ID Relative Deprivation in Wiltshire s Most and Least Deprived Areas The average IMD rank within Wiltshire s 10% most deprived LSOAs is 8,730, substantially below the whole county average. This figure has decreased by 2,335 from the ID 2004 to ID 2010, reflecting a relative increase in deprivation compared to a national benchmark (Figure 2.2). Of the seven primary deprivation domains, the lowest average rank within the 10% most deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for that domain is for the Barriers to Housing and Services domain (average rank of 792), followed by the Education, Skills and Training domain (average rank of 3,861). Average ranks within the 10% most deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the other primary domains range between 6,949 (Employment) and 9,245 (Crime). The largest change in relative deprivation within the 10% most deprived LSOAs has been within the Health Deprivation and Disability domain, with a decrease in average rank of

15 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 7 4,544 reflecting a relative increase in deprivation. This is followed by the Living Environment domain (decrease of 3,972) and Employment domain (decrease of 3,648). Increasing relative deprivation Figure % Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire: Average Indices of Deprivation Ranks for the ID 2004; ID 2007 and ID The 10% least deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire have an average IMD rank of 31,303, indicating that these LSOAs are among the least deprived in. Relative levels of deprivation within this group have changed very little from the ID 2004 to ID 2010, with an increase in average rank of 154 since ID 2004, indicating a marginal relative decrease in deprivation. The seven primary domains have similar average ranks in this least deprived category and also show very little change from the ID 2004 to ID The exception to this is the Barriers to Housing and Services domain, which shows an increase in average rank of 3,076 from ID 2004 to ID 2010 indicating a relative decrease in deprivation.

16 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 8 Increasing relative deprivation Figure % Least Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire: Average Indices of Deprivation Ranks for the ID 2004; ID 2007 and ID The difference between the average IMD rank for the 10% most and 10% least deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire is 22,573, with an increase in this difference of 2,488 from the ID 2004 to ID The greatest difference in average rank between the 10% most and 10% least deprived LSOAs is for the Barriers to Housing and Services domain, followed by the Education, Skills and Training domain (Figure 2.4). The smallest difference is for the Health Deprivation and Disability domain and the supplementary IDAOPI, however, the Health Deprivation and Disability domain has shown the largest increase in difference from the ID 2004 to ID 2010 (an increase of 4,413). The majority of other domains have also seen an increase in the difference between the average rank in the 10% most and least deprived LSOAs from the ID 2004 to ID 2010, with only IDACI showing a small decrease.

17 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 9 Figure 2.4. Difference in Average Rank between the 10% Most Deprived and 10% Least Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the ID 2004; ID 2007 and ID Number of Wiltshire Areas among the Most Severely Deprived in For the first time Wiltshire now has one LSOA in the most severely deprived 10% in on the overall measure of deprivation (Salisbury St Martin - Central), along with a total of five LSOAs in the 20% most deprived (an increase of 1 LSOA from ID 2004 to ID 2010) and 14 in the 30% most deprived nationally (an increase of 5 LSOAs - Table 2.2). The Salisbury St Martin central LSOA is also now in the 10% most deprived in with regard to the Health Deprivation and Disability domain; again this is first time that Wiltshire has had an LSOA in this category for the Health domain. There has been a moderate increase in the total numbers of Wiltshire LSOAs in the most deprived categories nationally for the Income domain, but a comparatively sharp increase in the number of LSOAs in the most deprived categories in for the Employment domain. This domain has seen an increase of 3 LSOAs in the 10% most deprived in, and this is again the first time that Wiltshire has had any LSOAs in this category for the Employment domain. The domain has also seen an increase of 8 LSOAs in the 20% most deprived nationally and 14 LSOAs in 30% most deprived.

18 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 10 Number of LSOAs in the 10% most deprived in Number of LSOAs in the 20% most deprived in Number of LSOAs in the 30% most deprived in Change ID 2004 to ID Change ID 2004 to ID Change ID 2004 to ID ID 2004 ID 2007 ID ID 2004 ID 2007 ID ID 2004 ID 2007 ID Overall IMD Income Income Deprivation Affecting Children Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Employment Health Deprivation & Disability Education, Skills & Training Barriers to Housing & Services Crime Living Environment Table 2.2. Number of Wiltshire LSOAs in the 10%, 20% and 30% most severely deprived in in the ID 2004; ID 2007 and; ID 2010.

19 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 11 The Barriers to Housing and Services domain has the highest number of LSOAs in the most deprived categories nationally (49 LSOAs in the 10% most deprived in ; 75 in the 20% most deprived and; 99 in the 30% most deprived for the ID 2010). This is, however, the only domain to have seen a decrease in the numbers of LSOAs in these most deprived categories (Table 2.2. and Figure 2.5). Figure 2.5. Number of Wiltshire LSOAs in the 30% Most Deprived in. Appendices 3 to 12 of this report contain tables showing the 10% most deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for each of the primary deprivation domains and the supplementary IDACI and IDAPI and indicate which of these LSOAs are in the most deprived categories in Wiltshire s Income and Employment Deprived Populations The scores for the two most important domains, income deprivation and employment deprivation, are real proportions of the population in each LSOA since they are derived from non-overlapping counts of people in families in receipt of means tested benefits; or of people

20 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 12 excluded from the labour market through unemployment, disability or ill health. The same is true of both the supplementary IDACI and IDAOPI, which are subsets of the income domain 6. We can therefore do two things with these domains which cannot be done with the overall index or the remaining five domains. The score can be applied to relevant population data to derive a real, quantitative measure of the number of people subject to income and employment deprivation in each LSOA, and the number of 0 to15 year olds or people aged 60 and over (excluding prisoners) in each LSOA who are in families claiming means tested benefits. The ID 2010 indicates that the total number of income deprived people in Wiltshire is around 39,100 (Table 2.3). This figure has increased substantially from the ID 2004 to ID 2007, with a growth of around 9,000 people, and then remained essentially flat between the ID 2007 and ID Even allowing for the increase in the county s population through this time this remains significant, with the size of the income deprived population increasing from 6.9% of the total population in ID 2004 to 8.6% of the total population in ID Interestingly, even though the average ranking for the Income domain in Wiltshire shows only a fairly small increase in relative deprivation through this time compared to a national benchmark (Table 2.1), the size of growth in the county s deprived population as outlined above has been marked. There has been only a small increase in the size of the income deprived child population from ID 2004 to ID 2010 (Table 2.3). However, the income deprived older people population has seen a large proportional increase with the rate of income deprivation among older people in Wiltshire increasing from around 9.1% of the 60 plus population in ID 2004 to around 12.1% in ID Similarly to the overall income deprived population, the majority of the increases within these younger and older populations occurred from the ID 2004 to ID 2007, with the size of the income deprived children population actually decreasing somewhat from ID 2007 to ID The income deprived children index refers to children below the age of 16, and the income deprived older people index refers to adults aged 60 and over.

21 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 13 ID 2004 (2001 data) Deprived population as a percentage of the total relevant population ID 2007 (2005 data) Deprived population as a percentage of the total relevant population ID 2010 (2008 data) Deprived population as a percentage of the total relevant population Change in percentage Income Deprived Population 30, % 39, % 39, % 1.7% Income Deprived Children Population 9, % 10, % 10, % 0.8% Income Deprived Older People Population 7, % 10, % 11, % 3.0% Employment Deprived Population 14, % 14, % 16, % 0.7% Table 2.3. Wiltshire s income and employment deprived populations from ID 2004; ID 2007 and ID 2010.

22 2. Deprivation in Wiltshire County 14 Wiltshire s employment deprived population stands at around 16,600 people in the ID 2010 data; with a moderate increase of around 2,200 people from the ID Unlike the changes in the income deprived population outlined above, the majority of the increase in the employment deprived population occurred between the ID 2007 to ID As the data used in the production of these indices relates primarily to 2001, 2005 and 2008 (as set out in the introduction to this report and Appendix 1), this time series captures the start of the economic downturn. However, even taking the onset of the recession into account, the decrease in Wiltshire s average rank for the Employment domain (Table 2.1 and Figure 2.1) and the increase in the number of LSOAs in the county that are in the most severely deprived in with regard to this domain (Table 2.2 and Figure 2.5) indicates that this increasing employment deprivation in Wiltshire is significant. It should also be noted that the overall size of the employment deprived population in Wiltshire and the rate as a percentage of the working age population increased slightly from the ID 2004 to ID 2007 in spite of the relatively buoyant national economy during this time.

23 3. Local Variations in Deprivation Local Variations in Deprivation 3.1. Wiltshire s Most Severely Deprived Areas For the overall measure of deprivation (IMD) the most deprived areas are typically urban, as these areas generally have the highest proportions of income and employment deprived people. Seven of the 10% most severely deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire are found in Salisbury Community Area; five in Chippenham; four in Trowbridge; three in Devizes and two in Melksham (Table 3.1. and Figure 3.1). Of rural parts of the county, the north and west appears generally less deprived when compared to south and east (Figure 3.1.). The Income, Employment, Health Deprivation and Disability, Education, Skills and Training and Crime domains show similar trends to the overall IMD, with the largest numbers of severely deprived LSOAs in the community areas which contain the county s main urban areas (Table 3.1). Deprivation in these domains also shows a similar geographic distribution, although the distinction between rural north west and south east Wiltshire is less prominent (Figure 3.2). There are a number of interesting community area level variations within these deprivation domains as set out below: Trowbridge Community Area has the highest number of LSOAs in the 10% most deprived for the Crime domain (seven), even though it has only four LSOAs in the 10% most deprived for overall deprivation; The most prominent form of deprivation in Westbury Community Area appears to be Income deprivation, with three LSOAs in the 10% most deprived for this domain compared to a maximum of only one for the other domains; Deprivation with regards to Education, Skills and Training is relatively evenly distributed, with four LSOAs in the 10% most deprived in each of Salisbury, Trowbridge and Melksham Community Areas, with this being the most prominent form of deprivation in the Melksham area. The least deprived areas with regards to this domain appear particularly focused in the north and west of the county; For the Health Deprivation and Disability domain, four of the five most deprived LSOAs in the county are located in the Salisbury Community Area.

24 3. Local Variations in Deprivation 16 The Barriers to Housing and Services and Living Environment domains show different geographic patterns to the domains described above, with the highest numbers of the 10% most deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire located in rural parts of the county (Figure 3.2. E and F). This reflects in the Community Area total numbers of LSOAs in the 10% most deprived for these domains (Table 3.1). Maps of the local variations in IDACI and IDAOPI ranks are shown in Appendix 13 of this report and of Wiltshire s income and employment deprived populations in Appendix 14. Community Area IMD Income Employment Health Depriv. & Disability Education Skills and Training Barriers to Housing & Services Crime Living Env. Salisbury Chippenham Trowbridge Devizes Melksham Westbury Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Calne Corsham Tidworth Amesbury Marlborough Pewsey Warminster Wilton Southern Wiltshire Tisbury Malmesbury Mere Bradford on Avon * * 29* 37* Table 3.1. Numbers of LSOAs in each Community Area in the 10% most deprived in Wiltshire for the overall IMD and for each primary domain in the ID * For those domains where the total number of LSOAs is greater than 28, this indicates that there are one or more LSOAs that cross Community Area boundaries and are therefore partly in one Community Area and partly in another. This is most common for the Barriers to Housing and Services and Living Environment domains where the most deprived LSOAs are large, rural LSOAs that more commonly cross Community Area boundaries.

25 3. Local Variations in Deprivation Figure 3.1. Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010: Ranking of Wiltshire LSOAs with 1 being the most deprived. 17

26 3. Local Variations in Deprivation 18 A. B.

27 3. Local Variations in Deprivation 19 C. D.

28 3. Local Variations in Deprivation 20 E. F.

29 3. Local Variations in Deprivation 21 G. Figure 3.2. Indices of Deprivation in Wiltshire 2010: Domain Ranking of LSOAs: A. Income; B. Employment; C. Health Deprivation and Disability: D. Education, Skills and Training; E. Barriers to Housing and Services; F. Living Environment; G. Crime Areas with Significant Changes Bowerhill south in Melksham Community Area has seen the largest positive change in IMD rank from the ID 2004 to ID 2010, with an increase in national rank of 9,681 and Wiltshire rank of 172 (Table 3.2). This is followed by Calne Lickhill north, which has seen an increase in national rank of 9,374 and Wiltshire rank of 110. These changes are assumed to relate largely to local changes in housing mix. Chippenham Community Area has the highest number of LSOAs that have seen the largest positive changes in Wiltshire for national IMD rank, including the whole of the Pewsham estate area and number of areas in the west of the town (Table 3.2 and Figure 3.3). Trowbridge Community Area has the second highest number of LSOAs that have seen the largest positive changes in Wiltshire, followed by Calne Community Area.

30 3. Local Variations in Deprivation 22 LSOA code Local name Community Area Change in IMD National Rank (ID 2004 to ID 2010) Change in IMD Wiltshire Rank (ID 2004 to ID 2010) E Bowerhill south Melksham 9, E Calne Lickhill - north Calne 9, Chippenham Pewsham - Chippenham E east 8, Chippenham Pewsham - Chippenham E central 7, Part Bradford on Avon; Part E Staverton & Hilperton (part) Trowbridge 7, Chippenham Pewsham - Chippenham E north west 6, E Wootton Bassett South - east Wootton Bassett & Cricklade 6, E Brokerswood Part Trowbridge; Part Westbury 6, E Westbury Ham - north Westbury 6, Chippenham Cepen Park - Chippenham E south 6, Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge E Wiltshire Drive 5, E Calne Chilvester Calne 5, Salisbury Harnham East - Salisbury E south 5, E Alderbury Southern 4, Chippenham Pewsham - Chippenham E south west 4, E Wootton Bassett South - west Wootton Bassett & Cricklade 3, E Brokenborough Malmesbury 3, E Calne Priestley - north east Calne 3, E Bedwyn Pewsey 3, E Warminster West - west Warminster 3, E Calne Marden Calne 3, E Corsham (Pickwick) south Corsham 2, E Chippenham Avon - west Chippenham 2, Amesbury East - Amesbury E Boscombe Down 2, Trowbridge Park - Green Trowbridge E Lane 2, E Salisbury Bemerton - north Salisbury 2, Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge E Croft 2, E Tisbury rural & Ansty Tisbury 2, Table 3.2. LSOAs with the largest increase in IMD rank from the ID 2004 to ID 2010, reflecting the largest relative decreases in overall deprivation.

31 3. Local Variations in Deprivation 23 The Ludgershall east and Faberstown and Ludgershall north LSOAs in Tidworth Community Area have seen the largest negative changes in national IMD rank, followed by the Devizes East - north and Chippenham Redland north LSOAs (Table 3.3). In addition to the positive changes outlined above, Chippenham Community Area also has the highest number of LSOAs in the county that have seen the largest negative change in national IMD rank; with these being mainly located in central areas of Chippenham town (Table 3.3 and Figure 3.3). Salisbury Community Area contains the next highest numbers of LSOAs that have seen the largest negative changes in national IMD rank in Wiltshire; again these are largely in town central locations.

32 3. Local Variations in Deprivation 24 Community Area Change in IMD National Rank (ID 2004 to ID 2010) Change in IMD Wiltshire Rank (ID 2004 to ID 2010) LSOA code Local name Ludgershall east & E Faberstown Tidworth -8, E Ludgershall north Tidworth -8, E Devizes East - north Devizes -7, Chippenham Redland - E north Chippenham -7, E Lacock & Gastard east Corsham -7, E Wylye & Langfords Amesbury -7, E Salisbury St Martin - west Salisbury -7, E Calne Abberd - north Calne -7, E Chippenham Audley - south Chippenham -6, E Salisbury St Paul - south Salisbury -6, E Pewsey south Pewsey -6, E Chippenham Audley - north Chippenham -6, E Cricklade central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade -5, E Chippenham London Road - east Chippenham -5, E Middle Winterslow, West Dean & Farley Southern -5, E Chalke Valley Wilton -5, E Salisbury Bemerton Village Salisbury -5, E Chippenham Queens - east Chippenham -5,289-8 E Salisbury St Edmund - south Salisbury -5, E Marlborough East - south Marlborough -5, E Wootton Bassett South - central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade -5, E Warminster East - Boreham Warminster -4, E Devizes East - south Devizes -4, E Melksham Spa - central Melksham -4, E Melksham North - north west Melksham -4, E Wilton north Wilton -4, E Shalbourne, Grafton & Chute Part Pewsey; Part Tidworth -4, E Southwick & Wingfield Part BoA; Part Trowbridge -4, Table 3.3. LSOAs with the largest decrease in IMD rank from the ID2004 to ID2010, reflecting the largest relative increases in overall deprivation.

33 3. Local Variations in Deprivation Figure 3.3. Wiltshire s LSOAs that have seen the largest positive and largest negative changes in IMD rank from the ID 2004 to ID

34 4. Key Messages Key Messages The key message to take from this new dataset is that while Wiltshire still reflects favourably against the national picture with regards to deprivation, the county is becoming relatively more deprived in relation to all deprivation domains with the exception of Barriers to Housing and Services. Associated with this increase in relative deprivation, Wiltshire now for the first time has one area in the 10% most severely deprived in with regards to overall deprivation: Salisbury St Martin central. This area is now also in the 10% most severely deprived in with regards to the Health Deprivation and Disability domain, and is one of three areas in Wiltshire in the 10% most deprived in for the Employment domain. For both the Health and Employment domains, this is again the first time that Wiltshire has had any LSOAs in the most deprived 10% nationally. The majority of data in the ID 2010 relates to 2008 and so captures the onset of the economic downturn. A further key message to be taken from this data is that while the size of Wiltshire s employment deprived population has increased mainly as a result of the recession, the county s decreasing national rank with regards to employment deprivation indicates that Wiltshire has other issues that are increasing employment and other forms deprivation relatively compared to the benchmark. This is particularly highlighted by the increasing size of Wiltshire s income deprived population prior to the onset of the recession. In order to further understand the drivers of the increasing relative deprivation in Wiltshire and to examine how these trends have developed in more recent data, follow-up research is being carried out that will examine all available datasets relating to the key deprivation domains.

35 27

36 Appendices 28 Appendix 1. Composition of and Changes to the Deprivation Domains Contained within this appendix are brief outlines of the composition of each domain. To allow for comparison between the different editions of the ID (2004, 2007 and 2010) details of any changes in the composition of each domain have been included. For full details can be found in the Technical Report accompanying the Indices at: Income Deprivation Domain: The purpose of this domain is to capture the proportion of the population experiencing income deprivation in an area. The indicators for this domain are: Adults and children in Income Support Households (Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), 2008); Adults and children in Income-Based JSA Households (Source: DWP, 2008); Adults and children in Pension Credit (Guarantee) Households (Source: DWP, 2008); Adults and children in those Working Tax Credit households where there are children in receipt of Child Tax Credit whose equivalised income (excluding housing benefits) is below 60 per cent of the median before housing costs (Source: HMRC, 2008); Adults and children in Child Tax Credit Households (who are not eligible for IS, Income - Based JSA, Pension Credit or Working Tax Credit) whose equivalised income (excluding housing benefits) is below 60 per cent of the median before housing costs (Source: HMRC, 2008); National Asylum Support Service (NASS) supported asylum seekers in in receipt of subsistence support, accommodation support, or both (Source: NASS, 2008). In addition, an Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index and an Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index were created. These two indices represent the proportion of children aged 0 to 15 living in income deprived households and the proportion of older people aged 60 and over living in income deprived households respectively. Adaptations Income support was replaced by the Pension Tax Credit.

37 Appendices 29 Working Family Tax Credit and Disabled Persons Tax Credit were replaced with a single Working Tax Credit. Child Tax Credit has replaced provisions for dependent children within these tax credits. These replacement indicators appear to capture the original indicators No changes have been made to the indicators. Employment Deprivation Domain: This domain measures employment deprivation conceptualised as involuntary exclusion of the working age population from the labour market. The indicators for this domain are: Recipients of Jobseekers Allowance (both contribution-based and income-based): men aged and women aged (Source: DWP, 2008); Recipients of Incapacity Benefit: men aged and women aged (Source: DWP, 2008); Recipients of Severe Disablement Allowance: men aged and women aged (Source: DWP, 2008); Recipients of Employment and Support Allowance aged 18-59/64 (those with a contribution-based element) (Source: DWP, 2008); Participants in the New Deal for the s who are not in receipt of JSA (Source: DWP, 2008); Participants in the New Deal for 25+ who are not in receipt of JSA (Source: DWP, 2008); Participants in the New Deal for Lone Parents (after initial interview) (Source: DWP, 2008). Adaptations Unemployment Claimant Counts were replaced by those receiving Job Seekers Allowance. This replacement indicator captures the original indicator.

38 Appendices The Employment and Support Allowance introduced in October 2008 required this indicator to be added to the domain in order to retain the domain s definition adopted in the ID2007. Health Deprivation and Disability Domain: This domain measures rates of poor health, early mortality and disability in an area and covers the entire age range. The indicators for this domain are: Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) (Source: ONS, 2004 to 2008); Comparative Illness and Disability Ratio (CIDR) (Source: DWP, 2008): Measures of acute morbidity, derived from Hospital Episode Statistics (Source: Department of Health, 2007 to 2008); The proportion of adults under 60 suffering from mood or anxiety disorders based in prescribing (Source: Prescribing Pricing Authority), Hospital Episode Statistics, 2005 (Source: Department of Health), and and Incapacity Benefit Data (Source: DWP, 2008). Adaptations No changes have been made to the indicators No changes have been made to the indicators. Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain: This domain captures the extent of deprivation in terms of education, skills and training in a local area. The indicators are structured into two sub-domains: one relating to education deprivation for children and young people in the area, and one relating to lack of skills and qualifications among a sub-set of the working age adult population. The indicators for this domain are: Sub Domain: Children and young people: Average test score of pupils at Key Stage 2 (2 year weighted average, , Source: Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF));

39 Appendices 31 Average test score of pupils at Key Stage 3 (2 year weighted average, , (Source: DCSF); Best of eight average capped points score at Key Stage 4 (this includes results of GCSE s, GNVQ s and other vocational equivalents) (2year weighted average, , Source: DCSF); Proportion of young people not staying on in school or non-advanced education above the age of 16 (Source: HMRC Child Benefit (CB) data, 2007 and 2009); Secondary school absence rate: (2 year average , Source DCSF); Proportion of those aged under 21 not entering higher education (4 year average, to , Source Universities and Colleges Admission Service (UCAS), Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)). Sub Domain: Skills: Proportions of working age adults (aged 25-54) in the area with no or low qualification (Source: 2001 Census). Adaptations Key Stage test scores were made available in time-series data due to the creation of a Pupil Level Annual School Census and the National Pupil Database. Key Stage 2 and 3 indicators were based upon actual test scores rather than the level achieved. Child benefit data was constructed using more appropriate time-series data which reduces the occurrence of staying on rates over 100% To uphold a consistent message with the department of education the average points score at Key Stage 2 and 3 used the level achieved data rather than actual test scores which were used in the ID2007. A more accurate measure of school absence rates at LSOA level has been developed since ID2007 and so has been adopted in the ID2010.

40 Appendices 32 Barriers to Housing and Services Domain: The purpose of this domain is to measure barriers to housing and key local services. The indicators are structured into two-sub domains: geographical barriers, and wider barriers which includes issues relating to access to housing, such as affordability. The indicators for this domain are: Sub Domain: Wider Barriers: Household overcrowding (Source: 2001 Census). LA level percentage of households for whom a decision on their application for assistance under the homeless provisions of housing legislation has been made assigned to the constituent SOAs (Source: Communities and Local Government, ). Difficulty of Access to owner-occupation (Source: modelled estimated produced by Heriot-Watt University, 2008). Sub Domain: Geographical Barriers: Road distance to a GP surgery (Source: National Administrative Codes Service, 2010). Road distance to a general stores or supermarket (Source: MapInfo Ltd, 2008). Road distance to a primary school (Source: DCFS, 2010). Road distance to a Post Office or sub Post Office (Source: Post Office Ltd, 2008). Adaptations No changes have been made to the indicators A minor methodological modification of the access to owner occupation indicator has occurred since the ID2007.

41 Appendices 33 Crime Domain: This domain measures the rate of recorded crime for four major crime types, representing the risk of personal and material victimisation at a small area level. The indicators for this domain are: Burglary (4 recorded crime offence types, Police Force data for April March 2009, constrained to Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership (CDRP) level). Theft (5 recorded crime offence types, Police Force data for April 2008-March 2009, constrained to CDRP level). Criminal damage (11 recorded crime offence types, Police Force data for April March 2009, constrained to CDRP level). Violence (19 recorded crime offence types including Robbery, Police Force data for April 2008-March 2009, constrained to CDRP level). Adaptations No changes have been made to the indicators No change in the methodology has occurred. However the Home Office has redefined some of the offence categories but not to a level that has changed the indictor definition. Living Environment Domain: This domain focuses on deprivation with respect to the characteristics of the living environment. It comprises two sub-domains: the indoors living environment which measures the quality of housing, and the outdoors living environment which contains two measures about air quality and road traffic accidents. The indicators for this domain are: Sub-Domain: The indoors lining environment: Social and private housing in poor condition (Source: BRE and Communities and Local Government, modelled EHCS, 2005). Houses without central heating (Source: 2001 Census).

42 Appendices 34 Sub-Domain: The outdoors living environment: Air quality (Source: Geography Department at Staffordshire University and NAEI modelled at LSOA level, 2008). Road Traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists (Source: DFT, STATS19, average (Road Accident Data) smoother to LSOA level). Adaptations No changes have been made to the indicators No changes have been made to the indicators. Overall impact It seems likely that the main impact of these changes impacts the income domain, although even here it is likely to be very small perhaps negligible. Elsewhere, the impact of the changes is to make the results more reliable, rather than incompatible. For the combined Indices of multiple deprivation it is unlikely these change have caused a negative effect and they do not appear to prevent cautious comparisons between the editions.

43 Appendices 35 Appendix 2. Wiltshire s LSOAs

44 Appendices 36 LSOA Code Map Number Local Name E Aldbourne E All Cannings, Chirton, Patney & Marden E Bedwyn E Bishops Cannings & Etchilhampton E Bromham west & Rowde south west E Rowde north east & Bromham east E Burbage E Cheverells, Worton & Marston E Collingbournes & Everleigh E Devizes East - north E Devizes East - central E Devizes East - south E Devizes North - west E Devizes North - east E Devizes South - east E Devizes South - west E Lavingtons south E Lavingtons north E Ludgershall north E Ludgershall east & Faberstown E Marlborough East - south E Marlborough East - north E Marlborough West - north E Marlborough West - west (Manton) E Marlborough West - south E Milton Lilbourne, Easton & Wootton Rivers E Netheravon, Enford & Fittleton E Ogbournes, Mildenhall & Fyfield E Pewsey south E Pewsey north E West Overton, Woodborough, Alton & Stanton St Bernard E Potterne E Baydon, Froxfield & Chilton Foliat E Ramsbury E Roundway E Seend & Poulshot E Shalbourne, Grafton & Chute E Ludgershall south & Perham down E Tidworth north west E Tidworth south E Tidworth north east E Upavon, Manningford, Rushall & Wilsford E Urchfont & Easterton E Avebury, Broad Hinton & Winterbournes E Crudwell & Oaksey E Minety E Ashton Keynes E Box west E Rudloe north

45 Appendices 37 LSOA Code Map Number Local Name E Box Hill & Rudloe south E Bremhill, Christian Malford & Langley Burrell E Somerfords E Brinkworth E Charlton & Hankerton E Calne Abberd - north E Calne Abberd - south E Calne Chilvester E Calne Lickhill - south E Calne Lickhill - north E Calne Marden E Calne Priestley - south west E Calne Priestley - north east E Calne Quemerford E Calne Without west & Heddington E Chippenham Cepen Park - central E Chippenham Cepen Park - south E Chippenham Cepen Park - north E Chippenham Allington - north E Chippenham Allington - south E Chippenham Audley - north E Chippenham Audley - south E Chippenham Avon - east E Chippenham Avon - west E Chippenham Hill Rise - north west E Chippenham Hill Rise - south east E Chippenham London Road - east E Chippenham London Road - west E Chippenham Monkton Park E Chippenham Park - west E Chippenham Park - east E Chippenham Pewsham - south west E Chippenham Pewsham - east E Chippenham Pewsham - central E Chippenham Pewsham - north west E Chippenham Redland - north E Chippenham Redland - south E Chippenham Queens - west E Chippenham Queens - east E Colerne village E Colerne Southwood / Northwood / Pinewood / Thickwood E Corsham east E Corsham central E Corsham south E Cricklade west & Chelworth Green E Cricklade east, Latton & Marston Maisey E Cricklade central E Hilmarton & Compton Bassett E Calne Without east & Cherhill E Sutton Benger, Kington Langley & Seagry

46 Appendices 38 LSOA Code Map Number Local Name E Yatton Keynell, Kington St Michael & Biddestone E Neston, Leafield & Gastard west E Lacock & Gastard east E Lyneham north E Lyneham east, Tockenham & Clyffe Pypard E Bradenstoke E Lyneham south E Malmesbury north west E Brokenborough E Malmesbury south east E Nettleton, Grittleton & North Wraxall E Stanton St Quintin & Castle Combe E Corsham (Pickwick) north E Corsham (Pickwick) south E Purton east E Purton central E Purton south & Braydon E Sherston west, Luckington & Sopworth E Sherston east, Norton & Easton Grey E Malmesbury Without E Hullavington E Broad Town & Hook E Lydiard Millicent E Wootton Bassett North - central E Wootton Bassett North - east E Wootton Bassett North - north west E Wootton Bassett South - south east E Wootton Bassett South - central E Wootton Bassett South - west E Wootton Bassett South - east E Alderbury E Grimsteads E Whiteparish E Landfords E Amesbury East - north E Amesbury East - north central E Amesbury East - south E Amesbury East - Boscombe down E Amesbury East - south central E Amesbury West E Salisbury Bemerton - north E Salisbury Bemerton - west E Salisbury Bemerton - east E Salisbury Bemerton - south E Salisbury Bishopdown - north E Salisbury Bishopdown - central E Salisbury Bishopdown - south E Bulford Camp (part), Figheldean & Milston E Bulford Camp (part) E Bulford Village

47 Appendices 39 LSOA Code Map Number Local Name E Chalke Valley E Donheads E Redlynch & Woodfalls E Downton south E Morgans Vale E Downton - north & Charlton E Durrington - south E Durrington - east E Durrington - Larkhill Camp E Durrington - north E Coombe Bissett, Odstock, Britford & Netherhampton E Salisbury Bemerton Village E Salisbury Churchfields - west E Salisbury Churchfields - east E Dinton, Barford St Martin, Chilmark & Fonthill Bishop E Salisbury Harnham East - east E Salisbury Harnham East - west E Salisbury Harnham East - south E Salisbury Harnham West - south E Salisbury Harnham West - north E Knoyle & Hindon E Laverstock (part) & Clarendon Park E Laverstock (part) E South Newton, Great Wishford, Durnford & Woodfords E Salisbury St Edmund - south E Salisbury St Edmund - east (Milford north) E Salisbury St Edmund - north E Salisbury St Mark - east E Salisbury Stratford E Salisbury St Mark - west E Salisbury St Mark - south E Salisbury St Martin - east (Milford south) E Salisbury St Martin - west E Salisbury St Martin - central E Salisbury St Paul - south E Salisbury St Paul - north E Shrewton & Winterbourne Stoke E Wylye & Langfords E Tilshead & Orcheston E Tisbury rural & Ansty E Tisbury E Fovant, Sutton Mandeville & Swallowcliffe E Idmiston & Porton E Newton Tony, Cholderton & Boscombe E Winterbournes E Mere (part) & Zeals (part) E Zeals (part), Maiden Bradley, Kilmington & Stourton E Mere (part) E Wilton south E Wilton north

48 Appendices 40 LSOA Code Map Number Local Name E Wilton rural & Quidhampton E Firsdown, Pitton & West Winterslow E Middle Winterslow, West dean & Farley E Atworth E Shaw & Whitley E Bradford on Avon North - north E Bradford on Avon North - central E Bradford on Avon North - west E Bradford on Avon South - east E Bradford on Avon South - south E Bradford on Avon South - central E Chapmanslade & Corsley E Brokerswood E North Bradley - north E Dilton Marsh & Upton Scudamore E Edington, Coulston & Bratton - south E Heywood & Bratton - north E Broughton Gifford E Holt E Monkton Farleigh, South Wraxall & Turleigh E Winsley & Limpley Stoke E Westwood E Melksham North - south west E Melksham North - north west E Melksham North - north east E Melksham North - south east E Melksham Spa - east E Melksham Spa - west E Melksham Spa - central E Melksham Spa - south E Berryfield & Bowerhill (part) E Beanacre & Bowerhill (part) E Bowerhill south E Melksham Woodrow - south E Melksham Woodrow - north E Chitterne & Codfords E Heytesbury & Mid Wylye south E Semington, Hilperton village (part) & Paxcroft Mead (part) E Staverton & Hilperton (part) E Hilperton (Marsh) E Hilperton village (part) & Paxcroft Mead (part) E Horningsham & deverills south E Sutton Veny E Southwick & Wingfield E Keevil & Ashtons E Trowbridge Adcroft - Stallard E Trowbridge Adcroft - Seymour E Trowbridge Adcroft - Canal Road E Trowbridge College - Silver Street E Trowbridge College - central

49 Appendices 41 LSOA Code Map Number Local Name E Trowbridge College - Clarendon (Frome Road) E Trowbridge College - Upper Studley E Trowbridge Drynham - Wiltshire drive E Trowbridge Drynham - Lower Studley E Trowbridge Drynham - central E Trowbridge Drynham - Croft E Trowbridge John of Gaunt - Studley Green E Trowbridge John of Gaunt - Broadmead E Trowbridge John of Gaunt - Wingfield Road E Trowbridge Park - Victoria Road & Paxcroft Mead (part) E Trowbridge Park - north E Trowbridge Park - central E Trowbridge Park - Green Lane E Warminster East - central E Warminster East - Boreham E Warminster East - Woodcock E Warminster East - Henfords Marsh (south) E Warminster East - Imber Road E Warminster East - Cop Heap E Warminster West - south E Warminster West - west E Warminster West - Westbury Road E Warminster West - north central E Warminster West - south central E Warminster West - east central E Westbury Ham - central E Westbury Ham - north E Westbury Ham - Eden Vale E Westbury Ham - west E Westbury Laverton - central E Westbury Laverton - Leigh E Westbury Laverton - east

50 Appendices 42 Appendix 3. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the overall IMD Local Name Salisbury St Martin - central Community Area Partnership Salisbury IMD Score Rank of IMD (where 1 is most deprived) in Rank of IMD (where 1 is most deprived) in Wiltshire Trowbridge Adcroft - Trowbridge Seymour Trowbridge John of Gaunt Trowbridge - Studley Green Salisbury Bemerton - west Salisbury Salisbury Bemerton - Salisbury south Calne Abberd - south Calne Melksham North - north Melksham east Chippenham Queens - Chippenham east Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge Lower Studley Westbury Ham - west Westbury Melksham North - south Melksham west Salisbury St Edmund - Salisbury south Chippenham Audley - Chippenham south Wootton Bassett North - central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Devizes North - east Devizes Chippenham Avon - east Chippenham Chippenham Hill Rise - Chippenham north west Chippenham London Road Chippenham - west Amesbury East - north Amesbury central Salisbury St Mark - west Salisbury Devizes East - central Devizes Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge central Ludgershall north Tidworth Marlborough East - north Marlborough Salisbury Bishopdown - Salisbury south Corsham (Pickwick) north Corsham Devizes South - west Devizes Salisbury Bemerton - north Salisbury % most deprived in 20% most deprived in 30% most deprived in

51 Appendices 43 Appendix 4. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Income Domain Local Name Community Area Partnership Income Score Rank of Income Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Rank of Income Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Wiltshire Trowbridge John of Gaunt - Trowbridge Studley Green Salisbury St Martin - Salisbury central Calne Abberd - south Calne Salisbury Bemerton - south Salisbury Westbury Ham - west Westbury Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge Lower Studley Melksham North - north Melksham east Chippenham Queens - Chippenham east Trowbridge Adcroft - Trowbridge Seymour Wootton Bassett North - central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Chippenham Hill Rise - Chippenham north west Salisbury Bemerton - west Salisbury Melksham North - south Melksham west Chippenham Audley - Chippenham south Westbury Ham - central Westbury Salisbury St Mark - west Salisbury Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge central Devizes South - west Devizes Chippenham Redland - Chippenham north Ludgershall north Tidworth Devizes East - central Devizes Devizes North - east Devizes Dilton Marsh & Upton Scudamore Part Warminster; Part Westbury Corsham (Pickwick) north Corsham Amesbury East - north Amesbury central Chippenham Avon - east Chippenham Pewsey south Pewsey Marlborough East - north Marlborough % most deprived in 30% most deprived in

52 Appendices 44 Appendix 5. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Employment Domain Local Name Community Area Partnership Employment Score Rank of Employment Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Rank of Employment Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Wiltshire Trowbridge John of Gaunt - Trowbridge Studley Green Salisbury St Martin - central Salisbury Trowbridge Adcroft - Trowbridge Seymour Salisbury Bemerton - south Salisbury Calne Abberd - south Calne Salisbury St Edmund - south Salisbury Chippenham Queens - east Chippenham Salisbury Bemerton - west Salisbury Melksham North - south Melksham west Westbury Ham - west Westbury Devizes North - east Devizes Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge Lower Studley Chippenham Audley - south Chippenham Wootton Bassett North - central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Chippenham Hill Rise - Chippenham north west Salisbury Bishopdown - Salisbury south Trowbridge College - Trowbridge Clarendon (Frome Road) Chippenham Avon - east Chippenham Chippenham London Road - Chippenham west Devizes South - west Devizes Melksham North - north east Melksham Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge central Corsham (Pickwick) north Corsham Salisbury Harnham West - Salisbury south Pewsey south Pewsey Salisbury St Mark - west Salisbury Devizes East - central Devizes Chippenham Redland - Chippenham north % most deprived in 20% most deprived in 30% most deprived in

53 Appendices 45 Appendix 6. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Health Deprivation and Disability Domain Local Name Community Area Partnership Health Deprivation and Disability Score Rank of Health Depr. and Disability Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Rank of Health Depr. and Disability Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Wiltshire Salisbury St Martin - central Salisbury Salisbury Bemerton - south Salisbury Chippenham Queens - east Chippenham Salisbury St Edmund - south Salisbury Salisbury Bemerton - west Salisbury Trowbridge John of Gaunt - Trowbridge Studley Green Ludgershall north Tidworth Chippenham Audley - south Chippenham Calne Abberd - south Calne Salisbury Bishopdown - south Salisbury Devizes North - east Devizes Purton south & Braydon Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Trowbridge Adcroft - Seymour Trowbridge Chippenham London Road - Chippenham west Devizes East - central Devizes Chippenham Hill Rise - north Chippenham west Corsham (Pickwick) north Corsham Wootton Bassett North - central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Westbury Ham - west Westbury Melksham North - south west Melksham Salisbury St Mark - west Salisbury Salisbury Harnham West - Salisbury south Chippenham Avon - east Chippenham Chippenham Redland - north Chippenham Trowbridge Drynham - Lower Trowbridge Studley Melksham North - north east Melksham Trowbridge College - Trowbridge Clarendon (Frome Road) Devizes South - west Devizes % most deprived in 20% most deprived in 30% most deprived in

54 Appendices 46 Appendix 7. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Education, Skills and Training Domain Local Name Community Area Partnership Education, Skills and Training Score Rank of Education, Skills and Training Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Rank of Education, Skills and Training Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Wiltshire Salisbury Bemerton - west Salisbury Trowbridge Adcroft - Seymour Trowbridge Melksham North - north east Melksham Trowbridge John of Gaunt - Trowbridge Studley Green Amesbury East - north central Amesbury Salisbury Bemerton - south Salisbury Westbury Ham - west Westbury Trowbridge Drynham - Lower Trowbridge Studley Salisbury St Martin - central Salisbury Melksham North - south west Melksham Calne Abberd - south Calne Wootton Bassett North - central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Ludgershall north Tidworth Marlborough East - north Marlborough Devizes East - central Devizes Durrington - south Amesbury Chippenham Hill Rise - north Chippenham west Melksham North - south east Melksham Chippenham Queens - east Chippenham Ludgershall east & Tidworth Faberstown Trowbridge Drynham - central Trowbridge Warminster East - Boreham Warminster Tidworth north east Tidworth Calne Lickhill - south Calne Warminster West - south Warminster central Salisbury Bemerton - north Salisbury Melksham Woodrow - south Melksham Chippenham Audley - south Chippenham % most deprived in 20% most deprived in

55 Appendices 47 Appendix 8. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Barriers to Housing and Services Domain Rank of Barriers to Housing and Services Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Rank of Barriers to Housing and Services Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Wiltshire Local Name Barriers Community to Area Housing Partnership and Services Score Wylye & Langfords Amesbury Part Tisbury; Donheads Part Wilton Part West Overton, Woodborough, Alton & Stanton St Bernard Marlborough; Part Pewsey Middle Winterslow, West Dean & Southern Farley Chalke Valley Wilton Shalbourne, Grafton & Chute Part Pewsey; Part Tidworth All Cannings, Chirton, Patney & Marden Part Devizes; Part Pewsey Zeals (part), Maiden Bradley, Kilmington & Stourton Part Mere; Part Warminster Knoyle & Hindon Part Mere: Part Tisbury Brinkworth Malmesbury Firsdown, Pitton & West Winterslow Southern South Newton, Great Wishford, Durnford & Woodfords Part Amesbury; Part Wilton Landfords Southern Minety Malmesbury Horningsham & Deverills south Warminster Nettleton, Grittleton & North Wraxall Chippenham Fovant, Sutton Mandeville & Tisbury Swallowcliffe Dinton, Barford St Martin, Chilmark & Fonthill Bishop Part Tisbury; Part Wilton Ogbournes, Mildenhall & Fyfield Marlborough Grimsteads Southern Coombe Bissett, Odstock, Britford & Netherhampton Part Southern; Part Wilton Avebury, Broad Hinton & Marlborough Winterbournes Part Milton Lilbourne, Easton & Wootton Rivers Marlborough; Part Pewsey Hilmarton & Compton Bassett Calne Chapmanslade & Corsley Warminster % most deprived in 2% most deprived in 3% most deprived in 4% most deprived in

56 Appendices 48 Charlton & Hankerton Malmesbury Newton Tony, Cholderton & Amesbury Boscombe Chitterne & Codfords Warminster

57 Appendices 49 Appendix 9. 10% Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Crime and Disorder Domain Community Area Partnership Crime and Disorder Score Rank of Crime and Disorder Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Rank of Crime and Disorder Score (where 1 is most deprived) in Wiltshire Local Name Salisbury Bemerton - west Salisbury Chippenham Avon - east Chippenham Salisbury St Martin - central Salisbury Warminster East - central Warminster Salisbury St Martin - west Salisbury Chippenham London Road - Chippenham west Trowbridge Adcroft - Trowbridge Seymour Salisbury Bemerton - south Salisbury Trowbridge Park - central Trowbridge Melksham Spa - west Melksham Melksham Spa - central Melksham Trowbridge College - central Trowbridge Devizes North - east Devizes Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge Lower Studley Cricklade central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Melksham North - south Melksham west Salisbury St Edmund - south Salisbury Southwick & Wingfield Part BoA; Part Trowbridge Calne Abberd - south Calne Chapmanslade & Corsley Warminster Warminster West - east Warminster central Salisbury Bemerton - east Salisbury Trowbridge College - Upper Trowbridge Studley Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge central Chippenham Audley - south Chippenham Heywood & Bratton - north Westbury Tidworth north east Tidworth Devizes East - central Devizes % most deprived in 20% most deprived in 30% most deprived in

58 Appendices 50 Appendix % Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Living Environment Domain Local Name Community Area Partnership Rank of Living Environment Score (where 1 is most Rank of Living Environment Score (where 1 is most Living Env. Score deprived) in deprived) in Wiltshire Trowbridge College - central Trowbridge Horningsham & Deverills south Warminster Zeals (part), Maiden Bradley, Kilmington & Stourton Part Mere; Part Warminster Salisbury St Edmund - south Salisbury Heytesbury & Mid Wylye south Warminster Donheads Part Tisbury; Part Wilton Chalke Valley Wilton Coombe Bissett, Odstock, Britford & Netherhampton Part Southern; Part Wilton Knoyle & Hindon Part Mere: Part Tisbury Lacock & Gastard east Corsham Salisbury St Martin - west Salisbury South Newton, Great Wishford, Durnford & Woodfords Part Amesbury; Part Wilton Salisbury Churchfields - east Salisbury Tilshead & Orcheston Amesbury West Overton, Woodborough, Alton & Stanton St Bernard Part Marlborough; Part Pewsey Dinton, Barford St Martin, Chilmark & Fonthill Bishop Part Tisbury; Part Wilton Collingbournes & Everleigh Tidworth Milton Lilbourne, Easton & Wootton Rivers Part Marlborough; Part Pewsey Nettleton, Grittleton & North Chippenham Wraxall Wylye & Langfords Amesbury Chitterne & Codfords Warminster Chippenham Park - east Chippenham Sutton Veny Warminster Bremhill, Christian Malford & Langley Burrell Part Calne; Part Chippenham Hilmarton & Compton Bassett Calne Warminster East - central Warminster Chippenham Avon - east Chippenham Sherston west, Luckington & Malmesbury Sopworth % most deprived in 30% most deprived in

59 Appendices 51 Appendix % Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index Rank of IDACI Rank of IDACI Community IDACI Score (where 1 is Score (where 1 is Local Name Area score most deprived) in most deprived) Partnership in Wiltshire Salisbury St Martin - central Salisbury Melksham North - north east Melksham Trowbridge Adcroft - Seymour Trowbridge Trowbridge Drynham - Lower Trowbridge Studley Trowbridge John of Gaunt - Trowbridge Studley Green Salisbury Bemerton - south Salisbury Chippenham Queens - east Chippenham Calne Abberd - south Calne Chippenham Hill Rise - north Chippenham west Wootton Wootton Bassett North - central Bassett & Cricklade Salisbury Bemerton - west Salisbury Westbury Ham - west Westbury Amesbury East - north central Amesbury Chippenham Avon - east Chippenham Calne Priestley - south west Calne Ludgershall north Tidworth Warminster East - Boreham Warminster Devizes East - central Devizes Dilton Marsh & Upton Scudamore Part Warminster; Part Westbury Melksham North - south west Melksham Devizes North - east Devizes Devizes South - west Devizes Ludgershall east & Faberstown Tidworth Trowbridge Drynham - central Trowbridge Westbury Laverton - central Westbury Salisbury St Mark - west Salisbury Chippenham Redland - north Chippenham Chippenham Audley - south Chippenham % most deprived in 20% most deprived in 30% most deprived in

60 Appendices 52 Appendix % Most Deprived LSOAs in Wiltshire for the Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index Local Name Rank of IDAOPI Rank of IDAOPI Score (where 1 Community Area IDAOPI Score (where 1 is is most Partnership score most deprived) in deprived) in Wiltshire Calne Abberd - south Calne Chippenham Queens - east Chippenham Chippenham Audley - south Chippenham Westbury Ham - central Westbury Salisbury St Martin - central Salisbury Westbury Ham - west Westbury Trowbridge John of Gaunt - Trowbridge Studley Green Wootton Bassett North - central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Trowbridge Drynham - Trowbridge central Salisbury St Mark - west Salisbury Melksham North - south west Melksham Wootton Bassett South - central Wootton Bassett & Cricklade Corsham (Pickwick) north Corsham Trowbridge Adcroft - Trowbridge Seymour Malmesbury north west Malmesbury Ludgershall north Tidworth Salisbury Bemerton - west Salisbury Trowbridge College - central Trowbridge Melksham North - north east Melksham Salisbury Bishopdown - Salisbury south Wootton Bassett Cricklade central & Cricklade Chippenham Hill Rise - north Chippenham west Marlborough East - north Marlborough Chippenham London Road - Chippenham west Mere (part) Mere Salisbury Bemerton - south Salisbury Amesbury East - north Amesbury central Calne Lickhill - north Calne % most deprived in 20% most deprived in 30% most deprived in

61 Appendices 53 Appendix 13. Local Variations in IDACI and IDAOPI Rank

62 Appendices 54

63 Appendices 55 Appendix 14. Local Distribution of Wiltshire s Income and Employment Deprived Populations

LSOA IMD Rank (1= most deprived)

LSOA IMD Rank (1= most deprived) The Indices of Deprivation 2015 provide a set of relative measures of deprivation for small areas (Lower-layer Super Output Areas*) across England, based on seven domains of deprivation. The domains were

More information

Childhood Obesity in Wiltshire:

Childhood Obesity in Wiltshire: Childhood Obesity in Wiltshire: National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP) Analysis 2011/12 2013/14 Public Health Intelligence Team December 2014 Document Prepared by Simon Hodsdon Public Health Analyst

More information

Chapter 1: The Population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Chapter 1: The Population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Population Estimate (thousands) Chapter 1: The Population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Population Trends and Projections National Records of Scotland estimated (NRS SAPE) 1 the 2013 NHS Greater Glasgow

More information

England s Seaside Towns: a benchmarking study. Prof Steve Fothergill CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University

England s Seaside Towns: a benchmarking study. Prof Steve Fothergill CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University England s Seaside Towns: a benchmarking study Prof Steve Fothergill CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University Four proposals for research A benchmarking study of seaside towns Incapacity claimants Seaside tourism

More information

APPENDIX 8. Leeds Socio-Economic Baseline Report. Report. July Metro and Leeds City Council

APPENDIX 8. Leeds Socio-Economic Baseline Report. Report. July Metro and Leeds City Council APPENDIX 8 Leeds Socio-Economic Baseline Report Report July 2009 Prepared for: Prepared by: Metro and Leeds City Council Steer Davies Gleave West Riding House 67 Albion Street Leeds LS1 5AA +44 (0)113

More information

Using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) to understand the drivers of deprivation in your district

Using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) to understand the drivers of deprivation in your district Using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) to understand the drivers of deprivation in your district Rachael McMillan Waikato Plan Programme Manager Purpose Understanding drivers of deprivation is important

More information

East Lothian. Skills Assessment January SDS-1154-Jan16

East Lothian. Skills Assessment January SDS-1154-Jan16 East Lothian Skills Assessment January 2016 SDS-1154-Jan16 Acknowledgement The Regional Skills Assessment Steering Group (Skills Development Scotland, Scottish Enterprise, the Scottish Funding Council

More information

Perth and Kinross Economic Journal Quarter (April - June 2016)

Perth and Kinross Economic Journal Quarter (April - June 2016) For more information regarding the content of this publication, please contact: Marek Styczen, Project Officer - Enterprise Planning & Development The Environment Service Perth & Kinross Council Pullar

More information

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile East Dunbartonshire Area Profile May 2014 Contents Executive Summary.. page 3 Introduction.. page 6 Population page 7 Age Structure. page 9 Population Projections page 11 Life Expectancy page 12 Ethnicity.

More information

WILTSHIRE PHARMACY BRADFORD ON AVON/ DEVIZES/ MELKSHAM/ TROWBRIDGE/ WARMINSTER/ WESTBURY OPENING HOURS EASTER Saturday 26th March 2016

WILTSHIRE PHARMACY BRADFORD ON AVON/ DEVIZES/ MELKSHAM/ TROWBRIDGE/ WARMINSTER/ WESTBURY OPENING HOURS EASTER Saturday 26th March 2016 BRADFORD ON AVON/ DEVIZES/ MELKSHAM/ TROWBRIDGE/ WARMINSTER/ WESTBURY Day Lewis 6 Silver Street Bradford on Avon BA15 1JX Tel: 01225 862212 Day Lewis Pharmacy St Margarets Station Approach Bradford on

More information

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism Oxfordshire - 2015 Economic Impact of Tourism Headline Figures Oxfordshire - 2015 Total number of trips (day & staying)

More information

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile East Dunbartonshire Area Profile May 2015 Contents Executive Summary.. page 3 Introduction.. page 6 Population page 7 Age Structure. page 9 Population Estimates..page 11 Population Projections page 13

More information

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism Epping Forest - 2014 Economic Impact of Tourism Headline Figures Epping Forest - 2014 Total number of trips (day & staying)

More information

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism Oxfordshire - 2016 Economic Impact of Tourism Headline Figures Oxfordshire - 2016 number of trips (day & staying) 27,592,106

More information

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism North Norfolk District - 2016 Contents Page Summary Results 2 Contextual analysis 4 Volume of Tourism 7 Staying Visitors

More information

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism Norfolk - 2016 Contents Page Summary Results 2 Contextual analysis 4 Volume of Tourism 7 Staying Visitors - Accommodation

More information

SHETLAND AREA PROFILE

SHETLAND AREA PROFILE www.hie.co.uk SHETLAND AREA PROFILE May 2014 SHETLAND AREA PROFILE INTRODUCTION The Shetland area profile uses 2011 Census data and other available data sources to present an up-to-date analysis of its

More information

Key Stats. 2.6 Percentage points. 1,050 New Jobs Filled Since launch 0.7% 17.7% 35.5% 230 Since last year 2.2% 14.8% Economy. Labour Market and Skills

Key Stats. 2.6 Percentage points. 1,050 New Jobs Filled Since launch 0.7% 17.7% 35.5% 230 Since last year 2.2% 14.8% Economy. Labour Market and Skills Key Stats Economy Employment rate % Get Oldham Working 2.6 Percentage points Labour Market and Skills Level 3 Qualifications % NEET % 1,050 New Jobs Filled Since launch Business 0.7% New businesses in

More information

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism Norfolk - 2017 Contents Page Summary Results 2 Contextual analysis 4 Volume of Tourism 7 Staying Visitors - Accommodation

More information

CAMPBELTOWN PROFILE May 2014

CAMPBELTOWN PROFILE May 2014 www.hie.co.uk CAMPBELTOWN PROFILE May 2014 CAMPBELTOWN PROFILE INTRODUCTION The Campbeltown profile uses 2011 Census data and other available data sources to present an up-to-date analysis of its population

More information

Population analysis of North West London for John Lyon s Charity

Population analysis of North West London for John Lyon s Charity Population analysis of North West London for John Lyon s Charity This note summarises the findings of our population analysis for the eight north west London boroughs in which John Lyon s Charity is active.

More information

July 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing

July 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing The following information summarises the DWP: (Central England Group) State of the Group Report (July 2016) and provides a focus on East Midlands through District level, local authority, and LEP data.

More information

PORTREE PROFILE May 2014

PORTREE PROFILE May 2014 www.hie.co.uk PORTREE PROFILE May 2014 PORTREE PROFILE INTRODUCTION The Portree profile uses 2011 Census data and other available data sources to present an up-to-date analysis of its population and labour

More information

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk Economic Impact of Tourism Norfolk - 2009 Produced by: East of England Tourism Dettingen House Dettingen Way, Bury St Edmunds Suffolk IP33 3TU Tel. 01284 727480 Contextual analysis Regional Economic Trends

More information

Perth & Kinross Council. Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016

Perth & Kinross Council. Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016 Perth & Kinross Council Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016 Contents Foreword... 3 Section 1: Spring 2016 destination follow up of 2014/15 school leavers... 4 Background... 4 Section A: Initial

More information

DUNOON PROFILE May 2014

DUNOON PROFILE May 2014 www.hie.co.uk DUNOON PROFILE May 2014 DUNOON PROFILE INTRODUCTION The Dunoon profile uses 2011 Census data and other available data sources to present an up-to-date analysis of its population and labour

More information

QCOSS Regional Homelessness Profile Mackay Statistical Division

QCOSS Regional Homelessness Profile Mackay Statistical Division QCOSS Regional Homelessness Profile Mackay Statistical Division March 2011 Council of Social Service Inc (QCOSS) March 2011 QCOSS would like to thank the Department of Communities for providing data from

More information

Swaziland. HDI values and rank changes in the 2013 Human Development Report

Swaziland. HDI values and rank changes in the 2013 Human Development Report Human Development Report 2013 The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World Explanatory note on 2013 HDR composite indices Swaziland HDI values and rank changes in the 2013 Human Development

More information

Inverness, Culloden and Suburbs Settlement Economic Overview

Inverness, Culloden and Suburbs Settlement Economic Overview Strategic planning and research Economic information December 2007 Inverness, Culloden and Suburbs Settlement Economic Overview Summary Between 2001 and 2006, the population of Inverness, Culloden and

More information

Supporting lone parents into work: The British Experience. Jane Hall Dept for Work and Pensions

Supporting lone parents into work: The British Experience. Jane Hall Dept for Work and Pensions Supporting lone parents into work: The British Experience Jane Hall Dept for Work and Pensions Overview Current number of lone parents in Great Britain Provision for lone parents from the 1990s - Work

More information

Scottish Index of Economic Resilience

Scottish Index of Economic Resilience Scottish Index of Economic Resilience Scottish Index of Economic Resilience Those involved in measuring the progress of local economies face the classic dilemma of seeing the woods from the trees. As more

More information

North Lanarkshire. Skills Assessment January SDS-1163-Jan16

North Lanarkshire. Skills Assessment January SDS-1163-Jan16 North Lanarkshire Skills Assessment January 2016 SDS-1163-Jan16 Acknowledgement The Regional Skills Assessment Steering Group (Skills Development Scotland, Scottish Enterprise, the Scottish Funding Council

More information

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research Commissioned by: Produced by: Destination Research www.destinationresearch.co.uk December 2016 Contents Page Introduction and Contextual Analysis 3 Headline Figures 5 Volume of Tourism 7 Staying Visitors

More information

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by: Commissioned by: Visit Herts Produced by: Destination Research www.destinationresearch.co.uk December 2016 Contents Page Introduction and Contextual Analysis 3 Headline Figures 5 Volume of Tourism 7 Staying

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014 The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 2. Table of

More information

Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 Briefing Paper

Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007 Briefing Paper Introduction Index of Multiple Deprivation Briefing Paper Cornwall Children and Young People s Partnership, 20th December The Department of Communities and Local Government commissioned the Social Disadvantage

More information

Inclusive Growth Calderdale project data pack

Inclusive Growth Calderdale project data pack Inclusive Growth Calderdale project data pack JRF Inclusive Growth Monitor Indicators: Calderdale results compared with Best Borough in the North authorities and Leeds City Region Updated 26 February 2018

More information

Scrappage for Equality

Scrappage for Equality Scrappage for Equality Calls continue to be made for the Government to sponsor a vehicle scrappage scheme to remove the most polluting vehicles from the parc. Previous RAC Foundation research has revealed

More information

DINGWALL PROFILE May 2014

DINGWALL PROFILE May 2014 www.hie.co.uk DINGWALL PROFILE May 2014 DINGWALL PROFILE INTRODUCTION The Dingwall profile uses 2011 Census data and other available data sources to present an up-to-date analysis of its population and

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove 2013 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2

More information

1.0 BACKGROUND NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES STUDY APPROACH EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7

1.0 BACKGROUND NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES STUDY APPROACH EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7 New Veterans Charter Evaluation Plan TABLE CONTENTS Page 1.0 BACKGROUND... 1 2.0 NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES... 2 3.0 STUDY APPROACH... 3 4.0 EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7 5.0 FUTURE PROJECTS...

More information

TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX

TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX Report - December 2016 AAA 1 AAA 2 Table of contents Foreword 4 Section One Overview 6 Section Two Summary of Results 7 Section Three Detailed Results 9 Section Four City

More information

Boxing Day 28 Dec 2015 (substitute day) New Years Day 1 January :00-17:00 Lunch: CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED

Boxing Day 28 Dec 2015 (substitute day) New Years Day 1 January :00-17:00 Lunch: CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED Day Lewis 6 Silver Street Bradford on Avon BA15 1JX Tel: 01225 862212 Day Lewis Pharmacy St Margarets Station Approach Bradford on Avon BA15 1DQ Tel:01225 862353 09:00-11:30 09:00-12:00 Day Lewis Market

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale 2015 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 2. Table of Results Table

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove 2014 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2

More information

Travel and Tourism in Ukraine: Key Trends and Opportunities to 2016

Travel and Tourism in Ukraine: Key Trends and Opportunities to 2016 Travel and Tourism in Ukraine: Key Trends and Opportunities to 2016 Reference code: TT0037MR_SP Published: July 2012 www.timetric.com Timetric John Carpenter House 7 Carmelite Street London EC4Y 0BS United

More information

Inverclyde Incapacity Benefit Claimant Profile

Inverclyde Incapacity Benefit Claimant Profile Scottish Observatory for Work and Health University of Glasgow Inverclyde Incapacity Benefit Claimant Profile April 21 Judith Brown Joel Smith David Webster James Arnott Ivan Turok Ewan Macdonald Richard

More information

Demographic Profile 2013 census

Demographic Profile 2013 census Demographic Profile 2013 census This profile provides basic population and demographic information on the residents of the Hauraki District. Population and demographic information is important for targeting

More information

Norfolk s Story October 2017

Norfolk s Story October 2017 Norfolk s Story October 2017 Version 8.0 Page 1 of 55 Contents 1 Key findings 3 2 Introduction 7 2.1 Purpose of Norfolk s Story 7 2.2 Statement on data 7 2.3 Norfolk the place an overview 8 3 Norfolk s

More information

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy 201 Forest of Dean district Produced on behalf of the Wye Valley and Forest of Dean Tourism Association By The South West Research Company Ltd January

More information

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy 2014 Forest of Dean district Produced on behalf of the Wye Valley and Forest of Dean Tourism Association By The South West Research Company Ltd

More information

Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015

Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015 Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015 An overview of the economic impact of self catering holidays in England Published by The South West Research Company Ltd March 2017 Contents Page

More information

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results Economic Impact of Tourism Cambridgeshire 2010 Results Produced by: Tourism South East Research Department 40 Chamberlayne Road, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO50 5JH sjarques@tourismse.com http://www.tourismsoutheast.com

More information

February 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing

February 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing The following information summarises the DWP (Central England Group) State of the Group Report (February 2016) and provides a focus on East Midlands through District level, local authority, and LEP data.

More information

A Profile of Deprivation in Larger English Seaside Destinations, 2007 and 2010

A Profile of Deprivation in Larger English Seaside Destinations, 2007 and 2010 A Profile of Deprivation in Larger English Seaside Destinations, 2007 and 2010 Author Name(s): Phil Humby, Area Based Analysis, Office for National Statistics Abstract There is a perception that the economies

More information

The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2015

The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2015 The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2015 Produced on behalf of the West Oxfordshire District Council By The South West Research Company Ltd October 201 1 Contents Page Introduction

More information

The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2016

The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2016 The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 201 Produced on behalf of the West Oxfordshire District Council By The South West Research Company Ltd January 2018 1 Contents Page Introduction

More information

South of England north-south connectivity

South of England north-south connectivity South of England north-south connectivity An outline economic case for the inclusion of north-south connectivity improvements to form part of the government s road investment strategy (RIS2) Weston-super-Mare

More information

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research Commissioned by: Visit Kent Produced by: Destination Research www.destinationresearch.co.uk November 2016 Contents Page Introduction and Contextual Analysis 3 Headline Figures 6 Volume of Tourism 8 Staying

More information

Regional Universities Network. Introduction. Regional Universities Network. Economic Impact of the Universities in the Regional Universities Network

Regional Universities Network. Introduction. Regional Universities Network. Economic Impact of the Universities in the Regional Universities Network Regional Universities Network Economic Impact of the Universities in the Regional Universities Network Introduction The Regional Universities Network (RUN) is a network of six universities with headquarters

More information

IT S YOUR AREA. what s important? TYWYN AREA. WELL-BEING ASSESSMENT GWYNEDD AND MÔN Gwynedd and Môn Public Services Board

IT S YOUR AREA. what s important? TYWYN AREA. WELL-BEING ASSESSMENT GWYNEDD AND MÔN Gwynedd and Môn Public Services Board IT S YOUR AREA. what s important? TYWYN AREA WELL-BEING ASSESSMENT GWYNEDD AND MÔN Gwynedd and Môn Public Services Board 2016 well-being assessment Gwynedd WANT to HAVE YOUR SAY? and Môn The new act has

More information

Page 1. Economic Impact Assessment of the Palm Island Community Company

Page 1. Economic Impact Assessment of the Palm Island Community Company Page 1 Economic Impact Assessment of the Palm Island Community Company INCORPORATING: Empower North is a group of expert consultants providing select clients with an integrated service across the specialist

More information

The Economic Impact of Poole s Visitor Economy 2015

The Economic Impact of Poole s Visitor Economy 2015 The Economic Impact of Poole s Visitor Economy 2015 Produced By The South West Research Company Ltd October 2016 Contents Page Introduction 3 Poole data 4 Dorset data 17 Introduction This report examines

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011 The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS 1. Summary of Results 1 2. Table of

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne 2016 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS Page 1. Summary of Results 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2

More information

HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT

HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT HEALTH SECTOR ECONOMIC INDICATORS REPORT For: Mid North Coast Local Health District Report prepared by: April 2013 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Executive Summary 4 Output 5 Value-Added 7 Workforce

More information

TRAMPING FINDINGS FROM THE 2013/14 ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY. Sport & Active Recreation Profile ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY SERIES.

TRAMPING FINDINGS FROM THE 2013/14 ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY. Sport & Active Recreation Profile ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY SERIES. ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY SERIES Te Rangahau Korikori o Aotearoa Sport & Active Recreation Profile TRAMPING FINDINGS FROM THE 213/14 ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY www.sportnz.org.nz Introduction Content This

More information

Devonport-Takapuna Local Board Profile

Devonport-Takapuna Local Board Profile Devonport-Takapuna Local Board Profile - Initial results from the Census February 2014 Social and Economic Research Team Research, Investigations and Monitoring Unit Auckland Council Map of Devonport-Takapuna

More information

Merseyside & Cheshire Local Authority Profile

Merseyside & Cheshire Local Authority Profile Injury Surveillance in the North West of England Merseyside & Cheshire Local Authority Profile St Helens Road Traffic Collisions April 2012 to March 2015 February 2016 Jennifer Germain, Simon Russell and

More information

TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX

TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX TRANSPORT AFFORDABILITY INDEX Report - March 2018 AAA 1 AAA 2 Table of contents Foreword 4 Section One Overview 6 Section Two Summary of Results 8 Section Three Detailed Results 14 Section Four State by

More information

THE IMPACT OF WELFARE REFORM ON SCOTLAND

THE IMPACT OF WELFARE REFORM ON SCOTLAND THE IMPACT OF WELFARE REFORM ON SCOTLAND Christina Beatty and Steve Fothergill CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University Four reports The Impact of Welfare Reform on Scotland (April 2013) The Local Impact of

More information

Massey Hall. 178 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T7. CAP Index, Inc. REPORT CONTENTS. About CAP Index, Inc. 3-Mile Methodology. 3 Tract Map.

Massey Hall. 178 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T7. CAP Index, Inc. REPORT CONTENTS. About CAP Index, Inc. 3-Mile Methodology. 3 Tract Map. REPORT CONTENTS 178 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T7 About 3-Mile Methodology 2 Summary 3 Tract Map 4 Contour Map 5 Scores 6-Mile Methodology 6 Summary. 7 Tract Map 8 Contour Map 9 Scores 10 Proximity

More information

West of England LEP Quarterly Economic Bulletin Issue 6

West of England LEP Quarterly Economic Bulletin Issue 6 West of England LEP Quarterly Economic Bulletin Issue 6 Introduction This quarterly economic bulletin is intended to provide an overview of the economic health of the West of England looking at a variety

More information

Figure 1.1 St. John s Location. 2.0 Overview/Structure

Figure 1.1 St. John s Location. 2.0 Overview/Structure St. John s Region 1.0 Introduction Newfoundland and Labrador s most dominant service centre, St. John s (population = 100,645) is also the province s capital and largest community (Government of Newfoundland

More information

Contents Manningham at a Glance... 6 Location and Area... 6 Manningham Activity Centres... 6 Manningham Suburbs... 6 Population... 8 Forecast... 9 For

Contents Manningham at a Glance... 6 Location and Area... 6 Manningham Activity Centres... 6 Manningham Suburbs... 6 Population... 8 Forecast... 9 For Contents Manningham at a Glance... 6 Location and Area... 6 Manningham Activity Centres... 6 Manningham Suburbs... 6 Population... 8 Forecast... 9 Forecast 2011 2036... 9 Population Forecast... 9 Gross

More information

The Yorke & Mid North (State Govt) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report

The Yorke & Mid North (State Govt) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report The Yorke & Mid North (State Govt) Region Workforce Wizard Region Report Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Population and Social Characteristics 4 Current Population 4 Age Groups 4 Key Populations

More information

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest 2008 Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH CONTENTS Glossary of terms 1 1. Summary of Results 4 2. Table

More information

CEREDIGION VISITOR SURVEY 2011 TOTAL SAMPLE. November 2011

CEREDIGION VISITOR SURVEY 2011 TOTAL SAMPLE. November 2011 CEREDIGION VISITOR SURVEY 2011 TOTAL SAMPLE November 2011 TERMS OF CONTRACT Unless otherwise agreed, the findings of this study remain the copyright of Beaufort Research Ltd and may not be quoted, published

More information

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time. PREFACE The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has embarked upon a statewide evaluation of transit system performance. The outcome of this evaluation is a benchmark of transit performance that

More information

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE 26 th Australasian Transport Research Forum Wellington New Zealand 1-3 October 2003 By, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand Abstract New Zealand

More information

Performance Clackamas Clackamas County Strategic Plan

Performance Clackamas Clackamas County Strategic Plan June 2017 update Performance Clackamas Clackamas County Strategic Plan Strategic Goals and Milestones This is the June 2017 update to Performance Clackamas, the Clackamas County Strategic Plan. The plan

More information

Incapacity Benefit Claimant Overview Profile

Incapacity Benefit Claimant Overview Profile Scottish Observatory for Work and Health University of Glasgow Incapacity Benefit Claimant Overview Profile April 2010 Judith Brown Joel Smith David Webster James Arnott Ivan Turok Ewan Macdonald Richard

More information

COUNTRY CASE STUDIES: OVERVIEW

COUNTRY CASE STUDIES: OVERVIEW APPENDIX C: COUNTRY CASE STUDIES: OVERVIEW The countries selected as cases for this evaluation include some of the Bank Group s oldest (Brazil and India) and largest clients in terms of both territory

More information

Grow the Economy Briefing note

Grow the Economy Briefing note Grow the Economy Briefing note Key messages March 2018 The Calderdale economy has shown resilience and consistent growth in the last five years. Since 2012 overall borough performance across a range of

More information

MELKSHAM STATION A Gateway to Melksham Proposals and Options

MELKSHAM STATION A Gateway to Melksham Proposals and Options MELKSHAM STATION A Gateway to Melksham Proposals and Options Melksham Population at 2011 Census 28,390 Yet last forward forecast 2021 is 28,720 Community Area Plan 1,930 houses 2006-2026 What will the

More information

Workplace Population: Key Facts

Workplace Population: Key Facts : Key Facts May 2014 Introduction Friday 23 rd May saw release 5.2 of 2011 Census data. Included in this release were the first statistics on the workplace population and the first data provided at the

More information

Poverty in Seychelles: Policy Digest

Poverty in Seychelles: Policy Digest Poverty in Seychelles: Policy Digest Christophe Muller (United Nations Development Programme Consultant, July 2012) This document reports on the estimation of a poverty line and a poverty profile for Seychelles

More information

2. Recommendations 2.1 Board members are asked to: i. note the content of the May 2018 Renfrewshire Economic Profile.

2. Recommendations 2.1 Board members are asked to: i. note the content of the May 2018 Renfrewshire Economic Profile. To: Leadership Board On: 20 June 2018 Report by: Director of Development and Housing Services Heading: Renfrewshire Economic Profile May 2018 1. Summary 1.1 This report is the second edition of a revised

More information

LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report

LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL Wandsworth borough report London Development Agency May 2008 CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 3 2. Tourism in London and the UK: recent trends... 4 3. The LATI model: a brief

More information

NOT FOR BROADCAST OR PUBLICATION BEFORE 00:01, TUESDAY 1 MARCH 2016

NOT FOR BROADCAST OR PUBLICATION BEFORE 00:01, TUESDAY 1 MARCH 2016 PRESS RELEASE NOT FOR BROADCAST OR PUBLICATION BEFORE 00:01, TUESDAY 1 MARCH 2016 The Bank of Scotland Rural Quality of Life Survey tracks where living standards are highest in Great Britain by ranking

More information

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY* July December 2015

SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY* July December 2015 SHIP MANAGEMENT SURVEY* July December 2015 1. SHIP MANAGEMENT REVENUES FROM NON- RESIDENTS Ship management revenues dropped marginally to 462 million, following a decline in global shipping markets. Germany

More information

HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY

HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY Household Travel Survey i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 SUMMARY OF TRAVEL... 2 2.1 All-Day Travel Patterns... 2 2.1.1 Automobile Availability... 2 2.1.2 Trip

More information

3. Aviation Activity Forecasts

3. Aviation Activity Forecasts 3. Aviation Activity Forecasts This section presents forecasts of aviation activity for the Airport through 2029. Forecasts were developed for enplaned passengers, air carrier and regional/commuter airline

More information

Analysing the performance of New Zealand universities in the 2010 Academic Ranking of World Universities. Tertiary education occasional paper 2010/07

Analysing the performance of New Zealand universities in the 2010 Academic Ranking of World Universities. Tertiary education occasional paper 2010/07 Analysing the performance of New Zealand universities in the 2010 Academic Ranking of World Universities Tertiary education occasional paper 2010/07 The Tertiary Education Occasional Papers provide short

More information

Report Overview Vietnam Hotel Survey 2013

Report Overview Vietnam Hotel Survey 2013 Report Overview Vietnam Hotel Survey 2013 This is an Executive Summary of the full 60 page Hotel Survey Report. Full copies can be obtained from Grant Thornton Vietnam. Grant Thornton Vietnam June 2013

More information

Puerto Ricans in Rhode Island, the United States, and Puerto Rico, 2013

Puerto Ricans in Rhode Island, the United States, and Puerto Rico, 2013 Issued September 2016 Centro DS2015US-07 Puerto Ricans in Rhode Island, the United States, and Puerto Rico, 2013 In 2013 an estimated 36,217 Puerto Ricans lived in Rhode Island and accounted for at least

More information

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018 Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report May 2018 This report has been prepared by Enterprise Marketing and Research Services 60 Main Road, Moonah TAS 7009 All enquiries

More information

Coordinated Population Forecast for Clackamas County, its Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB), and Area Outside UGBs

Coordinated Population Forecast for Clackamas County, its Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB), and Area Outside UGBs Coordinated Population Forecast for Clackamas County, its Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB), and Area Outside UGBs 2017-2067 Prepared by Population Research Center College of Urban and Public Affairs Portland

More information

Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Visitors Summer 2008 Summary of Findings

Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Visitors Summer 2008 Summary of Findings Introduction Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Visitors Summer 2008 Summary of Findings Office of Policy & Analysis Smithsonian Institution July 2008 In June 2008, the Office of Policy and Analysis

More information

THE LOCAL IMPACT OF THE UK BEER AND PUB SECTOR

THE LOCAL IMPACT OF THE UK BEER AND PUB SECTOR THE LOCAL IMPACT OF THE UK BEER AND PUB SECTOR A REPORT FOR THE BRITISH BEER AND PUB ASSOCIATION (BBPA) NOVEMBER 2016 Oxford Economics Oxford Economics was founded in 1981 as a commercial venture with

More information