Noise Oversight Committee

Transcription

1 Noise Oversight Committee May 8, 2014 Audio/Video recordings are made of this meeting 1

2 Item 1 Review and Approve Draft Meeting Minutes Minutes from March 19,

3 Item 2 Review of Operations Report Summary March

4 MSP Complaints March , ,069 20,000 18,000 MSP Noise Complaints MSP Complainants 1, , Complaints Total 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4, Complainants Total 2, J F MA M J J A S O N D J F MA M J J A S O N D J F MA M J J A S O N D J F MA M J J A S O N D J F M

5 Operations Total 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 Total Aircraft Operations March , ,118 37,855 39,856 39,930 37,118 35,023 36,377 35,167 36,734 33,239 33,758 34,208 30,980 36,318 33,048 29, Operations by Month 2014 Operations by Month

6 Air Carrier Jet Operations March , ,207 Air Carrier Jet Fleet Composition March Regional Jet Modified Stage 3 Other % 0% 49.2% % 0% 46.5%

7 Source: Metropolitan Airports Commission s Finance Department Monthly Passenger and Operations Reports Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Operations Regional Air Carrier Operations and Passengers Passengers Operations Passengers Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Operations Major Air Carrier Operations and Passengers Passengers Operations Passengers

8 Nighttime Operations (10:30pm 6:00am) March 2014 March 2013 Total 1,726 1,654 Carrier Jet 1,620 1,469 All Nighttime Use Percentages Runway March 2014 Arrivals 4 0% 12L 16.5% 12R 25.2% 17 0% 22 0% 30L 41.4% 30R 16% 35 1% All Nighttime Use Percentages Runway March 2014 Departures 4 0% 12L 16.1% 12R 31.2% % 22 0% 30L 30.1% 30R 11.3% 35 0%

9 March 2014 Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departures 4,701 Compliance with Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departure Procedure 99.8%

10 March 2014 Runways 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departures Carrier Jets Remaining in Corridor 3, %

11 March 2014 Carrier Jet Departures Crossing in the Corridor Nighttime (11:00pm 6:00am) Carrier Jet Departures Crossing in the Corridor Daytime (6:00am 11:00pm) 56 (53%) 827 (28%)

12 Item 3 Sound Level Measurement Ken Cox Product Manager Larson Davis 12

13 Sound Level Meter Measurement May 8, 2014

14 Who Am I? Ken Cox Product Manager Environmental Acoustics & Industrial Hygiene Products Ph: (801) years experience at Larson Davis US Delegate to IEC TC29 Electroacoustics since 2005 ANSI S1 and S12 representative

15 Outline Sound What is Sound? Atmospheric Effects Why Measure? Community Relations Commitment Credibility Standards US Standards International Standard Role of Standards

16 What is Noise?

17 Sound Propagation

18 Wavelength and Frequency

19 Weather Effects Courtesy of Port of Oakland

20 Wind Effects Wind speed increases with altitude Sound is focused on downwind side and shadowed on upwind side of source Courtesy of B&K

21 Temperature Effects Temperature gradient effects similar to wind Uniform in ALL directions Temperature inversions focus sound on ground Courtesy of B&K

22 Attenuation of Air

23 Why Monitor Noise? Better Community Relationships Demonstrate Organizational Commitment Build Credibility Data to Support Conclusions

24 Community Relations Regular Feedback Community Airport Management Airlines Governmental Responsiveness Community Involvement Citizen Committees Informed Local Government

25 Standards Examples

26 Role of Standards Establish Quality Thresholds Promote Safety and Reliability Support Government Policies Interoperability A standard is "a recognized unit of comparison by which the correctness of others can be determined. - ANSI

27 SLM Standards Sound Level Meters ANSI S1.4 Specification for Sound Level Meters ANSI S1.43 Specification for Integrating-Averaging Sound Level Meters Sound Level Meters IEC Sound Level Meters - Specifications IEC Sound Level Meters Pattern Evaluation Tests IEC Sound Level Meters Periodic Tests Other Standards European Community

28 Pattern Approval Validation from an independent lab of product performance claims Pattern Approval + Periodic Verification demonstrates compliance

29 Legal Metrology Legal metrology is the application of legal requirements to measurements and measuring instruments OIML.org Legal Requirements - Evidentiary quality ISO State or local laws Regulatory requirements

30 Conclusion Noise sources vary Noise propagation is complex Monitoring noise benefits organizations and communities Standards help ensure reliable measurements

31

32 Item 4 Noise Monitoring Study West and Northwest of MSP: Fall 2014 A Noise Monitoring Study is proposed for the cities of Edina and St. Louis Park The recommended study elements are as follows: The noise monitoring will be focused on assessing existing aircraft noise levels. The noise monitoring will be conducted for a period of two weeks in the fall of The monitoring will be limited to three locations in the area bound by I 494 on the south, Xerxes Avenue on the east from the intersection of I 494 and Xerxes Avenue extending in a straight line north to I 394, I 394 on the north, and Trunk Highway 169 on the west. Two of the monitoring locations will be in the City of Edina and one will be located in the City of St. Louis Park. The specific location of the monitors shall be determined by the respective cities, in consultation with MAC staff. No monitor may be located within two miles of another permanent noise monitor. The final report is due by December 1, 2014.

33 Item Annual Actual Noise Contour Report

34 Item 4 (continued) REQUESTED ACTION THE NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE DIRECTS THE MAC NOISE PROGRAM OFFICE STAFF TO CONDUCT THE NOISE MONITORING STUDY AS DETAILED, IN THE CITIES OF ST. LOUIS PARK AND EDINA. THE NOISE MONITORING REPORT SHALL BE COMPLETED BY DECEMBER 1, 2014 AND BE PROVIDED TO THE NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AND THE PARTICIPATING CITIES.

35 Item 5 Runway Use Study Overview The Runway Use System (RUS) for Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport (MSP), a defined list of runway prioritizations for arrival and departure procedures, is intended to reduce noise impacts in denselydeveloped residential areas to the west and northwest of the airport. The RUS gives first priority to departures and arrivals over open space, the Minnesota River, wetlands, and noise compatible commercial and industrial areas located to the south and southeast of MSP. Air traffic control at MSP is solely the responsibility of the FAA.

36 MSP Airfield Layout North Flow: Depart 30R/L Arrive 30R/L and 35 Item 5 (continued) South Flow: Depart12R/L and 17 Arrive 12R/L

37 Item 5 (continued) Existing Runway Use System Departure Preference 1. Runways 12L/R 2. Runway Either Runway 22 or Runways 30L/R Arrival Preference 1. Runways 30L/R 2. Runway Either Runway 22 or Runways 12L/R

38 :00 22:00 Item 5 (continued) :00 20:00 19:00 18:00 17:00 16:00 15:00 14:00 13:00 12:00 11:00 10:00 9:00 8:00 7:00 6:00 5: :00 3:00 2:00 1:00 6 0: Average Carrier Jet Daily Arrivals and Departures Traffic Demand by Hour July 2013 (1,286 Operations) Green = Low Demand, Yellow = Mid Demand, Red = High Demand Average Daily Operations

39 :00 22:00 21:00 Item 5 (continued) Arrival and Departure Banks Average Carrier Jet Daily Arrivals (644 Operations) and Departures (642 Operations) by Hour July :00 19:00 18:00 17:00 16:00 15:00 14:00 13:00 12:00 11:00 10:00 9:00 8:00 7:00 6:00 5:00 4:00 3:00 2:00 1:00 0:00 Arrivals Departures

40 Long term Wind Rose for MSP Item 5 (continued)

41 Wind Direction Variability Item 5 (continued) April 2012 April 2013

42 Item 5 (continued) Percentage of Runway Use: Nighttime Departures ,996 Total Carrier Jet Operations 30R 14% 04 0% 17 15% 22 0% 35 0% 30L 22% 12L 19% 12R 30%

43 Item 5 (continued) Percentage of Runway Use: Nighttime Arrivals ,596 Total Carrier Jet Operations 17 0% 04 0% 22 0% 35 2% 30R 17% 12L 13% 12R 30% 30L 38%

44 Item 5 (continued) Findings During the nighttime hours, when the wind speeds are low and air traffic volumes are reduced, the RUS is utilized to reduce noise impacts to the northwest and west of MSP. The departure operations are placed on Runways 12L/R and 17. This south flow configuration places arrivals on Runways 12L/R and has resulted in an increase in arrival noise impacts in residential areas located on the extended centerline of Runway 12R at night. When feasible, these impacts may be mitigated by using both Runway 12L and Runway 35 for more nighttime arrival operations.

45 Item 6 Continue Review of Runway 35 River Visual Approach Procedure The purpose of this procedure would be to reduce aircraft arrival overflights of residential areas south of MSP. Aircraft using this procedure would approach from the southwest, flying a 65 heading over the river. As an aircraft nears the airport, it would turn on to final approach and align with Runway

46 46

47 Item 6 (continued) The Performance Based Navigation Standard Terminal Arrival Routes proposed by the FAA for implementation at MSP do not include the Runway 35 River Visual Approach procedure. 47

48 Item 7 2 nd Quarter Public Input Meeting Review April 22, 2014 at the MAC General Offices 11 attendees, 3 speakers Topics: Routing of aircraft arrivals over non residential land uses (highway 77) Increased use of Runway 30L for departures to the northwest and west of MSP Concern that the Remote Monitoring Towers located to the northwest and west of MSP do not measure noise in communities further west of MSP 48

49 Item 8 Adjourn* *Notice: The next NOC meeting is July 16, 2014 MAC General Offices 1:30 p.m. 49