COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE
|
|
- Hilda Fields
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DISTRICT COURT, PARK COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 300 Fourth St. (P.O. Box 190) Fairplay, Colorado Plaintiff: ELKHORN RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Defendants: INDIAN MOUNTAIN CORP., in its individual capacity and its representative capacity as trustee for Indian Mountain Subdivision property owners, BAR STAR LAND, LLC, and ALL UNKNOWN PERSONS WHO CLAIM ANY INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS ACTION DATE FILED: June 8, :39 PM FILING ID: 162C569DE8DF2 CASE NUMBER: 2016CV30050 COURT USE ONLY Attorneys for Plaintiff, Elkhorn Ranch Owners Association: Paul F. Holleman, #21888 John D. Buchanan, #45191 BUCHANAN SPERLING & HOLLEMAN PC 7703 Ralston Road Arvada, Colorado ; COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND DECREE QUIETING TITLE Plaintiff, Elkhorn Ranch Homeowners Association, Inc., by and through its attorneys, Buchanan Sperling & Holleman PC, upon information and belief, states as follows: PARTIES Plaintiff 1. Plaintiff, Elkhorn Ranch Homeowners Association, Inc. ( Elkhorn ), is a Colorado nonprofit corporation organized in compliance with the requirements of the Colorado Revised Nonprofit Corporation Act, C.R.S See Exhibit A at 1.
2 Page 2 2. The primary purpose of Elkhorn is to govern the Elkhorn Ranches Subdivision, including administering the terms and conditions of the water augmentation plans approved by the Water Court, described below, which allow Elkhorn s residents to pump water through wells located in the Subdivision. Id. at 2, Elkhorn s principal office street and mailing address is 7208 S. Tucson Way, Suite 125, Centennial, Colorado Defendants 4. Defendant Indian Mountain Corp. ( IMC ) is a Colorado corporation. 5. IMC s principal office street address is 112 N. Rubey Dr., Golden, Colorado IMC s principal office mailing address is P.O. Box 1187, Golden, Colorado In the Findings, Conclusions, and Orders entered by this Court in Case No. 14CV30056, the Court determined that IMC holds legal title to an augmentation plan decreed by the Water Court, Water Division No. 1, in Case No. W-7389, and such title is held for the benefit of property owners in the nearby Indian Mountain Subdivision. Exhibit B at Defendant Bar Star Land, LLC ( Bar Star ) is a Colorado limited liability company. 8. Bar Star s principal office street address is 112 N. Rubey Dr., Golden, Colorado Bar Star s principal office mailing address is P.O. Box 1187, Golden, Colorado Unknown persons may claim an interest in the property described below that is the subject of this action. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10. The real property that is the subject matter of this action and the subject matter of the claims set forth herein are easements and water rights that are located in Park County. 11. The claims set forth herein arose in Park County. 12. Defendants purport to own and/or control land in Park County and to conduct business in Park County. 13. The claims set forth herein concern the ownership of reservoir storage space, easements, and rights-of-way associated with certain water rights, and do not concern water matters. See generally Kobobel v. State, 249 P.3d 1127, 1132 (Colo. 2011); Upper Platte & Beaver Canal Co.
3 Page 3 v. Riverview Commons General Improvement Dist., 250 P.3d 711 (Colo. App. 2010). The claims in this case thus fall within the general subject matter jurisdiction of the district courts and do not fall within the Water Court s subject matter jurisdiction over water matters. Id.; see also C.R.S (1). 14. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. See Colo. Const., Art. VI, 9; C.R.C.P. 57; C.R.S ; C.R.S , et. seq. 15. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. 16. Venue is proper in this Court. See C.R.C.P. 98(a). GENERAL STATEMENT OF THE NATURE OF THE CONTROVERSY Introduction 17. The Elkhorn Ranches Subdivision consists of several hundred residential lots and homes located near the town of Como in Park County, Colorado. 18. Potable water is supplied to individual homes in the Elkhorn Ranches Subdivision through domestic and household use wells permitted by the State Engineer ( Elkhorn Wells ) to supply individual lots. There is no potable water system in the Elkhorn Ranches Subdivision to provide water to individual lots. 19. Elkhorn s residents are only allowed to pump water from the Elkhorn Wells if Elkhorn follows the terms and conditions of Elkhorn s two augmentation plans decreed by the water court. 20. The augmentation plans require that Elkhorn divert its surface water rights when they are in priority during the irrigation season, store the diverted water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir, and release water from the reservoir into the stream system when required by the Division Engineer for Water Division No. 1 ( Division Engineer ). 21. Elkhorn owns 1) surface water rights that are decreed for augmentation uses and for storage of water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir pursuant to such augmentation use; 2) an easement for storage of water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir; and 3) the augmentation plans for augmenting the Elkhorn Wells, which expressly recognize Elkhorn s right to use Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. 22. Elkhorn acquired one of its surface water rights and its easement for storage of water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir from Park Development Co., the predecessor-in-interest of Defendants.
4 Page Elkhorn s augmentation plans have been in operation since shortly after they were decreed in In and around August 2013, Bar Star purported to purchase all shares of stock in IMC and land underlying and adjacent to Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. Thereafter, Defendants notified Elkhorn that they would not allow Elkhorn to access or use the reservoir unless Elkhorn paid Defendants approximately $30,000 per year. Exhibit C. 25. At the same time, Defendants also sent a demand for payment to the nearby Indian Mountain subdivision for $143,000 per year, and sued the Indian Mountain Metropolitan District over the dispute. This Court denied Defendants claims and determined them to be unconscionable, and would result in IMC being unjustly enriched. Exhibit B at Following Bar Star s purchase of IMC, Elkhorn attempted negotiations with the principals of Bar Star and IMC in an effort to resolve the disputes described herein without litigation; however, such negotiations have not been successful. 27. Elkhorn has valid agreements that are binding on Defendants and grant Elkhorn an easement for storage of water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. IMC has no claim to ownership of Elkhorn s water rights, easements, and augmentation plans and no right to exclude Elkhorn from using Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. 28. If Elkhorn is not allowed to divert and store water in and release water from Tarryall Ranch Reservoir as required by its augmentation plans and the Division Engineer, the Elkhorn Wells will be curtailed and Elkhorn s residents will be deprived of their water supply. Elkhorn s Water Rights 29. Elkhorn owns two surface water rights the Elkhorn Slater Ditch Right and the Elkhorn Guiraud Ditch Right, both described below that are decreed for storage in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir and for use as an augmentation water supply for the Elkhorn Wells. 30. As discussed below, Elkhorn has an easement to store water in one-third of the useable capacity of Tarryall Ranch Reservoir, with a minimum storage capacity allotted to Elkhorn of 41 acre feet. Slater Ditch Water Right 31. A water right was decreed to the Slater Ditch in the decree entered by the Park County District Court in Civil Action No. 341 on October 18, 1889, for 27 cubic feet per second ( cfs ) from Tarryall Creek with an appropriation date of May 20, 1880.
5 Page In 1970, Park Development Co. purchased the 27 cfs water right decreed to the Slater Ditch along with the land underlying and surrounding Tarryall Ranch Reservoir and two decreed water rights in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. Exhibit D. 33. Park Development Co. was the original developer for the nearby Indian Mountain subdivision and the predecessor-in-interest of Defendants. Exhibit B at 3, In February 1975, the Elkhorn Ranch Co. filed an application in the Water Court requesting approval to change a 4 cfs portion of the Slater Ditch water right ( Elkhorn Slater Ditch Right ) to augment depletions from wells supplying water to the Elkhorn Ranches Subdivision, Filing Nos. 2 and 3, and for storage of water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 2. The application was assigned Case No. W Exhibit E at In April 1975, Park Development Co. sold the Elkhorn Slater Ditch Right to the Elkhorn Ranch Co. Exhibit F. The agreement for sale of the water right ( Slater Agreement ) also granted an easement for storage of 41 acre feet of water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. Id. at 7. The Slater Agreement is expressly binding on the parties and their administrators, executors, successors and assigns. Id. at The Slater Agreement states that the Elkhorn Slater Ditch Right, which at the time was decreed for irrigation use, was purchased so that it could be changed for use in an augmentation plan for a residential subdivision. Exhibit F at In June 1975, Robert Dulin conveyed the Elkhorn Slater Ditch Right, and all rights associated therewith and appurtenant thereto, to the Elkhorn Ranch Company by warranty deed recorded in the books and records of the Park County Clerk and Recorder on December 15, 1975, Reception No , Book 248, Page 962. Exhibit G. 38. In July 1975, the water court decreed an augmentation plan in Case No. W-7903 ( W Decree ) that approved storage of the Elkhorn Slater Ditch Right in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 2 (as discussed below, the current Tarryall Ranch Reservoir was originally two smaller reservoirs, Tarryall Ranch Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2) of an average of 13.7 acre feet of water per year, with an accumulative 3-year total of not more than 41.1 acre feet of water, plus an additional amount to offset evaporation losses. Exhibit E at The W-7903 Decree included a finding of fact that the Elkhorn Ranch Company has a contractual agreement to use and, if necessary, enlarge the Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 2. Exhibit E at 2.
6 Page The W-7903 Decree states that Elkhorn has the right and duty to store water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir and to operate and enforce the augmentation plan. Id. at On September 7, 1976, Elkhorn Ranch Co. conveyed the Elkhorn Slater Ditch Water Right, and all rights associated therewith and appurtenant thereto, to Elkhorn by warranty deed recorded in the books and records of the Park County Clerk and Recorder on September 9, 1976, Reception No , Book 255, Page 870. Exhibit H. 42. The rights associated with and appurtenant to the Elkhorn Slater Ditch Right included the augmentation plan approved in the W-7903 Decree and the easement for storing water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir conveyed in the Slater Agreement. Guiraud Ditch Water Right 43. A water right was decreed to the Guiraud Ditch, a.k.a. the Guiraud 3T Ditch, in the decree entered by the Park County District Court in Civil Action No. 341 on October 18, 1889 for cfs. 44. In December 1975, the Elkhorn Ranch Co. and J.T. McDowell & Sons filed an application to change a 0.75 cfs portion of the Guiraud Ditch water right ( Elkhorn Guiraud Ditch Right ) to allow diversion of the water right through the Slater Ditch, storage in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir, and augmentation of Elkhorn Wells in Filing Nos. 4 and 5 of the Elkhorn Ranches Subdivision. Exhibit I at 1. The application was assigned Case No. W In February 1976, after execution of the Slater Agreement, Elkhorn Ranch Co. and Park Development Co. executed a second agreement regarding storage of Elkhorn s water rights in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir ( Tarryall Agreement ). Exhibit J. 46. The Tarryall Agreement increased the storage space in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir previously granted to Elkhorn Ranch Co. from 41 acre feet of water under the Slater Agreement to one-third of the useable storage capacity of Tarryall Ranch Reservoir if Elkhorn Ranch Co. paid for one-third of the construction costs for modifying the reservoir. Id. 47. The increased storage allotted to Elkhorn Ranch Co. under the Tarryall Agreement was for the purpose of allowing storage of approximately 10 acre feet of water under the Elkhorn Guiraud Ditch Right and the augmentation plan applied for in Case No. W Elkhorn Ranch Co. paid one-third of all costs that were billed or provided to Elkhorn for construction of Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. Exhibit K.
7 Page In July 1976, the water court decreed an augmentation plan in Case No. W-8107 ( W Decree ) that approved storage of the Elkhorn Guiraud Ditch Right in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 1 for up to acre feet of water. Exhibit I at The W-8107 Decree states that Elkhorn Ranch Co. has a right to the use of storage in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 1 by virtue of an agreement between applicant and Park Development Company, and included the Tarryall Agreement as exhibit F to the decree. Id.; Exhibit J. 51. The W-8107 Decree states that Elkhorn has the right and duty to store water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir and to operate and enforce the augmentation plan. Exhibit I at In August 1976, J.T. McDowell & Sons conveyed the Elkhorn Guiraud Ditch Right, and all rights associated therewith and appurtenant thereto, to Elkhorn Ranch Co. by warranty deed recorded in the books and records of the Park County Clerk and Recorder on September 7, 1976, Reception No , Book 255, Page 836. Exhibit L. 53. In September 1976, Elkhorn Ranch Co. conveyed the Elkhorn Guiraud Ditch Water Right, and all rights associated therewith and appurtenant thereto, to Elkhorn by warranty deed recorded in the books and records of the Park County Clerk and Recorder on September 9, 1976, Reception No , Book 255, Page 869. Exhibit M. 54. The rights associated with and appurtenant to the Elkhorn Guiraud Ditch Right included the augmentation plan approved in the W-8107 Decree and the easement for storing water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir conveyed in the Slater and Tarryall Agreements. Tarryall Ranch Reservoir 55. Tarryall Ranch Reservoir originally consisted of two separate reservoirs. 56. Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 1 was constructed during or before 1923, with the dam and storage pool approximately located in the NW1/4 of Section 12, Township 9 South, Range 76 West of the 6 th P.M. in Park County, Colorado. 57. Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 2 was constructed during the year 1938, adjacent to Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 1, with the dam also approximately located in the NW1/4 of Section 12, Township 9 South, Range 76 West of the 6 th P.M., and the storage pool located in said quarter section and in the NE1/4 of Section 11, Township 9 South, Range 76 West of the 6 th P.M., all in Park County, Colorado.
8 Page The dam for Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 1 was enlarged in 1976, with the dam remaining approximately located in the NW1/4 of Section 12, Township 9 South, Range 76 West of the 6 th P.M. 59. Following the enlargement of the dam for Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 1, the location of the dam for Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 2 was inundated and the storage pools for Tarryall Ranch Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 are now the same, single storage pool, which is located in the NW1/4 of Section 12, the NE1/4 of Section 11, Township 9 South, Range 76 West of the 6 th P.M., the SE1/4 of Section 2, Township 9 South, Range 76 West of the 6 th P.M., and the SW1/4 of Section 1, Township 9 South, Range 76 West of the 6 th P.M. 60. Following the enlargement of the dam for Tarryall Ranch Reservoir No. 1, Tarryall Ranch Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 have been operated as a single reservoir (collectively referred to herein as Tarryall Ranch Reservoir ). 61. At the time of enlargement of Tarryall Ranch Reservoir, the State Engineer determined the total storage capacity of the reservoir to be 160 acre feet. Exhibit N. 62. Water is delivered into Tarryall Ranch Reservoir from the Slater Ditch. The point of diversion for the Slater Ditch is located on Tarryall Creek in the SE1/4 of Section 20, Township 8 South, Range 76 West of the 6 th P.M. in Park County, Colorado. The Slater Ditch then runs southeasterly into a diversion pond located in the N1/2 of Section 28, Township 8 South, Range 76 West of the 6th P.M. The Slater Ditch then proceeds in a generally southeasterly direction towards Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. 63. Portions of the Slater Ditch and Tarryall Ranch Reservoir are located on land purported to be owned and/or controlled by Defendants. 64. Tarryall Ranch Reservoir is accessed through a road that begins at Park County Road 15, a.k.a. Elkhorn Road, in Section 1, Township 9 South, Range 76 West of the 6th P.M. and ends at the Tarryall Ranch Reservoir in Section 12, Township 9 South, Range 76 West of the 6th P.M. ( Tarryall Access Road ). Defendants Denial of Elkhorn s Right to Store Water In and Access Tarryall Ranch Reservoir 65. Elkhorn owns the Elkhorn Slater Ditch Right and Elkhorn Guiraud Ditch Right (collectively, the Elkhorn Water Rights ), the augmentation plans approved in the W-7903 Decree and in the W-8107 Decree (collectively, the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans ), an exclusive easement to store water in one-third of the useable capacity in Tarryall Ranch
9 Page 9 Reservoir ( Elkhorn Storage Easement ), and all rights and interests associated with such water rights, augmentation plans, and easement. 66. The Slater Agreement originally allotted 41 acre feet of storage space in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir under the Elkhorn Storage Easement. The Tarryall Agreement increased such storage space to one-third of the enlarged capacity upon modification of the reservoir. Accordingly, the Elkhorn Storage Easement consists of one-third of the useable capacity of Tarryall Ranch Reservoir, with a minimum storage capacity allotted to Elkhorn of 41 acre feet. 67. Under Colorado law, Elkhorn s ownership of its water rights and the Elkhorn Storage Easement entitle Elkhorn to all rights reasonably necessary for the use of the water rights and easement, such as the right to use, access and maintain ditches, reservoirs, and other structures related to the diversion and use of the water rights. See, e.g., Bijou Irr. Dist. v. Empire Club, 804 P.2d 175, (Colo. 1991); Leonard v. Buerger, 276 P.2d 986, 989, 130 Colo. 497, (Colo. 1954). 68. The Elkhorn Augmentation Plans have been in operation and have allowed pumping of the Elkhorn Wells to supply water to the residences in the Elkhorn Ranches Subdivision, Filing Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, since entry of the W-8107 Decree and W-7903 Decree in Any interest that Defendants may claim in the Tarryall Ranch Reservoir and the land underlying and adjacent to the reservoir was obtained by conveyance from Park Development Co. to IMC by deed dated March 8, 1976 and recorded in the books and records of the Park County Clerk and Recorder on March 22, 1976, Reception No , Book 251, Page 15. Exhibit O; Exhibit B at The conveyance from Park Development Co. to IMC on March 8, 1976 occurred after Park Development Co. had conveyed the Elkhorn Slater Ditch Right and the Elkhorn Storage Easement to Elkhorn s predecessors-in-interest in the Slater and Tarryall Agreements, dated April 9, 1975 and February 25, 1976, respectively. 71. In August 2013, Bar Star purchased all shares of stock in IMC. Exhibit B at Defendants had actual and constructive knowledge of the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans, the Elkhorn Storage Easement, and Elkhorn s use of the Elkhorn Water Rights and Tarryall Ranch Reservoir when Defendants acquired their purported interest in any land or water storage rights associated with Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. 73. Soon after Bar Star purchased IMC in August 2013, Defendants constructed a gate across the Tarryall Access Road, locked the gate, and have denied Elkhorn access to Tarryall Ranch Reservoir.
10 Page Soon after Bar Star purchased IMC, Defendants sent invoices to Elkhorn and the Indian Mountain Metropolitan District requesting payment of approximately $30,000 and $286,000, respectively, for Water Augmentation Maintenance Plan[s] for 2012 and See Exhibit B at 6; Exhibit C. 75. Defendants do not own any interest in the Elkhorn Storage Easement, the Elkhorn Water Rights, or the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans. Defendants have no authority or right to charge Elkhorn for operation, maintenance, repair, or any other activities related to the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans, Elkhorn Storage Easement, or Elkhorn Water Rights. 76. Defendants have no authority to deny Elkhorn access to Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. 77. In Case No. 14CV30056, IMC filed a lawsuit against Indian Mountain Metropolitan District claiming that it owned the water rights associated with the Indian Mountain subdivision s augmentation plan and thus should be entitled to compensation from the Indian Mountain Metropolitan District. Exhibit B at This Court denied IMC s claims in Case No. 14CV30056 and determined that equitable title to the water rights belonged to the property owners in the Indian Mountain subdivision, and that IMC would be unjustly enriched by charging ongoing fees forty (40) years later for use of the augmentation water. Id. at Since Bar Star purchased IMC, Defendants have denied Elkhorn s right to divert water into, store water in, and access Tarryall Ranch Reservoir unless Elkhorn pays ongoing annual fees. Such denial of access constitutes a continuing interference with Elkhorn s use and enjoyment of Elkhorn s Storage Easement, Water Rights, and Augmentation Plans. 80. After the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans were decreed and before Bar Star acquired IMC, a period of more than 35 years, IMC never denied that Elkhorn had the right to store water in and access Tarryall Ranch Reservoir or to operate the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans. 81. Elkhorn paid consideration for the Elkhorn Storage Easement pursuant to the Slater and Tarryall Agreements. 82. In order for the Elkhorn Wells to pump water for their domestic and household uses under the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans, Elkhorn must divert and store water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir and release water from storage in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir in the amounts and at times deemed necessary by the Division Engineer.
11 Page When the Division Engineer requires Elkhorn to release water from Tarryall Ranch Reservoir, Elkhorn must release water or the Division Engineer shall curtail pumping of the Elkhorn Wells. 84. If the Elkhorn Wells are curtailed, the homes that are supplied water by the Elkhorn Wells will have no water supply. 85. A genuine controversy exists between Elkhorn and the Defendants regarding Elkhorn s right to access, maintain, and use the Tarryall Ranch Reservoir and the Elkhorn Water Rights, Elkhorn Augmentation Plans, and Elkhorn Storage Easement on land owned and/or controlled by the Defendants. REQUEST FOR DECLARATION AND DETERMINATION OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO C.R.S , et. seq. AND C.R.C.P Elkhorn incorporates the foregoing allegations as if set forth verbatim. 87. The Slater Agreement and Tarryall Agreement are valid, binding agreements that entitle Elkhorn Ranch to an exclusive easement to store water in one-third of the useable capacity in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir, with a minimum storage capacity allotted to Elkhorn of 41 acre feet, and to take all actions reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of such easement including, but not limited to, ingress and egress along the Tarryall Access Road. 88. If for any reason the Slater and Tarryall Agreements are found unenforceable, Elkhorn owns an easement under operation of Colorado law by grant, license, prescription, and/or estoppel, to divert water into Tarryall Ranch Reservoir and to store water in one-third of the useable capacity in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir, with a minimum storage capacity allotted to Elkhorn of 41 acre feet, and all rights and interests reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of such easement including, but not limited to, ingress and egress along the Tarryall Access Road. 89. Defendants have denied Elkhorn access to Tarryall Ranch Reservoir and have denied Elkhorn s right to store water in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir. WHEREFORE, Elkhorn requests the Court to enter a decree pursuant to C.R.S et seq. and C.R.C.P. 57 as follows: a. Finding and determining that Elkhorn owns an exclusive easement to store water in one-third of the useable capacity in Tarryall Ranch Reservoir, with a minimum storage capacity allotted to Elkhorn of 41 acre feet;
12 Page 12 b. Finding and determining that the scope of the easement includes all rights and interests reasonably necessary for the use, operation and maintenance of the Elkhorn Water Rights, the Elkhorn Storage Easement and the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans, including, but not limited to, ingress and egress along the Tarryall Access Road; c. Prohibiting Defendants from interfering in any way with Elkhorn s use and enjoyment of the Elkhorn Water Rights, the Elkhorn Storage Easement and the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans, including, but not limited to, ingress and egress along the Tarryall Access Road; d. Awarding Elkhorn such compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees and costs as permitted by law; and e. Granting such further relief the Court may deem proper. REQUEST FOR DECREE QUIETING TITLE PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P Elkhorn incorporates the foregoing allegations as if set forth verbatim. 91. Elkhorn owns exclusive title to the Elkhorn Water Rights, the Elkhorn Storage Easement, the Elkhorn Augmentation Plans, and all rights and interests associated therewith (collectively, the Property ). 92. Defendants claim some right, title or interest in and to some or all of the Property, which claim(s) are adverse to Elkhorn, and any such claims by Defendants are without foundation or right. 93. WHEREFORE, Elkhorn requests the Court to enter a decree pursuant to C.R.C.P. 105 including a complete adjudication of the rights of all parties to this action as follows: a. Finding and determining that Defendants, and any person claiming any interest under or through Defendants, have no interest, estate or claim of any kind whatsoever in the Property; b. Forever barring and enjoining the Defendants, and any person claiming any interest under or through Defendants, from asserting any claim or title to the Property; c. Quieting the title of Elkhorn in and to the Property and adjudging that Elkhorn is the owner in fee simple and entitled to the possession, use and benefit of the Property;
13
CASE NO. 2019CW10 (REF NO. 12CW118).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIVISION NO. 4 STATE OF COLORADO TO: ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN SAID WATER DIVISION NO. 4 Pursuant to C.R.S. 37-92-302, as amended, you are notified
More informationDISTRICT COURT, WATER DIV. 6, COLORADO TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN WATER DIV. 6
DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIV. 6, COLORADO TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN WATER DIV. 6 Pursuant to C.R.S. 37-92-302, you are hereby notified that the following pages comprise a resume of
More informationSTATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT I NO. Attorney General, and Mitchell A. Riese, Assistant Attorney General, files this action against
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 STATE OF WASHINGTON, V. STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff, MOTEL 6 OPERATING L.P., Defendant. I NO. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY,
More informationGUNNISON COUNTY. CASE NO. 2013CW75 (REF NO. 06CW199).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIVISION NO. 4 STATE OF COLORADO TO: ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN SAID WATER DIVISION NO. 4 Pursuant to C.R.S. 37-92-302, as amended, you are notified
More informationCase 3:18-cv FAB Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO CIVIL NO.
Case 3:18-cv-01797-FAB Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO MUNICIPALITY OF CABO ROJO CIVIL NO. Plaintiff V.S. POWERSECURE, INC.; THOMPSON
More informationTO: ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN SAID WATER DIVISION NO. 7
DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 7, COLORADO WATER RESUME TO: ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN SAID WATER DIVISION NO. 7 Pursuant to C.R.S. 37-92-302, you are notified that the following is
More informationU.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT Co RT FILED
U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT Co RT FILED FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF T XAS DALLAS DIVISION Jt\N i 2 2006 MARK WOODALL, MICHAEL P. MCMAHON, PAUL J. MADSON,
More informationLegal Status and Governing Board
History The Wenatchee Reclamation District s formation and water rights began with a series of events beginning around the turn of the century. The District currently has right of 200 cubic feet per second
More informationCase 4:15-cv DMR Document 1 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-0-dmr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Peter B. Fredman (Cal. State Bar No. 0 LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN University Ave, Suite 0 Berkeley, CA 0 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0 - peter@peterfredmanlaw.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Howard Hughes Parkway 0 MICHAEL J. McCUE (Nevada Bar #0) LEWIS AND ROCA LLP Howard Hughes Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada Tel: (0) -0 Fax: (0) - Attorneys for
More informationCase 3:08-cv JSW Document 1 Filed 07/17/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 3:08-cv-03446-JSW Document 1 Filed 07/17/2008 Page 1 of 8 Shah Peerally (CA Bar No: 230818) Erich Keefe (CA Bar No: 226746) LAW OFFICES OF SHAH PEERALLY 4510 Peralta Blvd, Suite 25 Fremont, CA 94536
More informationCharter Service Agreement
Charter Service Agreement This Charter Service Agreement ("Agreement") is effective as of the day it is executed by and between Apollo Jets, LLC, a New York limited liability company with its primary place
More informationWilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill
Wilderness Areas Designated by the White Pine County bill SEC. 321. SHORT TITLE. This subtitle may be cited as the `Pam White Wilderness Act of 2006'. SEC. 322. FINDINGS. Congress finds that-- The White
More informationGENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR ONLINE TICKETING
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR ONLINE TICKETING (Ordering tickets in our online ticket shop) 1. General scope of application 1.1. These Terms and Conditions shall be valid for ordering tickets for the
More informationCase 1:15-cv LMB-IDD Document 136 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 2183
Case 1:15-cv-01494-LMB-IDD Document 136 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 2183 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division TIM P. BRUNDLE, on behalf of the Constellis
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIVISION NO. 4 STATE OF COLORADO TO: ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN SAID WATER DIVISION NO.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WATER DIVISION NO. 4 STATE OF COLORADO TO: ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN SAID WATER DIVISION NO. 4 Pursuant to C.R.S. 37-92-302, as amended, you are notified
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/12/ :31 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/12/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/12/2016 01:31 PM INDEX NO. 655422/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/12/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Project Orbis International,
More informationPART I GENERAL INFORMATION OF KENT COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
PART I GENERAL INFORMATION OF KENT COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1.1 BACKGROUND: The Kent County Water Authority was created by Chapter 1740 of the January Session 1946 of the General Assembly of the State of
More information3. GENERAL REGULATIONS: The following shall be the general rules and regulations for use of municipal cemeteries:
THE CORINTH BOARD OF CEMETERY COMMISSIONERS BYLAWS AND REGULATIONS 1. DECLARATION OF POLICY: The Corinth Board of Cemetery Commissioners, pursuant to 18 V.S.A. s5378, hereby adopts that the following bylaws
More informationExhibitor ticket portal 2018 prices
Exhibitor ticket portal 2018 prices Type of ticket Price (EUR) incl. VAT Price (EUR) net* Type of services included in the ticket Ausstellerausweis / Exhibitor pass Literarischer Agent / Literary Agent
More informationAPPENDIX C-1 [COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND MANDAMUS RELIEF]
APPENDIX C-1 [COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND MANDAMUS RELIEF] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE LISA DOE and BORIS DOE, Plaintiffs, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY OF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case :0-cv-00 Document Filed 0//0 Page of 0 MICHAEL J. McCUE (Nevada Bar #0) JENNIFER K. CRAFT (Nevada Bar #0) LEWIS AND ROCA LLP, Las Vegas, Nevada Tel: (0) -0 Fax: (0) - Attorneys for Plaintiff Stratosphere
More informationProvided by: UKM-KS. Valid as of February 2018
Provided by: UKM-KS Valid as of February 2018 General Terms and Conditions for Airport Tours, Advance Sales of Tickets for Events of the Visitor Service and Reservation of Articles Sold by the Airport
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''', ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. ) v. ) Judge: ) Alejandro Mayorkas,
More informationFILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 12/24/ :13 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/24/2016
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 12/24/2016 01:13 AM INDEX NO. 610149/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/24/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU -------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationCase 4:13-cv Document 5 Filed in TXSD on 05/13/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:13-cv-01088 Document 5 Filed in TXSD on 05/13/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC. v. Plaintiff,
More informationDIVISION 5 WATER COURT- JULY 2018 RESUME
DIVISION 5 WATER COURT- JULY 2018 RESUME 1. PURSUANT TO C.R.S., 37-92-302, AS AMENDED, YOU ARE NOTIFIED THAT THE FOLLOWING PAGES CLERK FOR DURING THE MONTH OF JULY 2018. 18CW11 (CA 1277) SUMMIT COUNTY.
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. Defendant, the Wildflower Inn a/k/a DOR Associates LLP (the Wildflower Inn ), for nominal
STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Katherine Baker and Ming-Lien Linsley, Plaintiffs v. Wildflower Inn a/k/a DOR Associates LLP, Defendant Caledonia Unit Docket No. -7-11 CACV COMPLAINT 1.
More informationShuttle Membership Agreement
Shuttle Membership Agreement Trend Aviation, LLC. FlyTrendAviation.com Membership with Trend Aviation, LLC. ("Trend Aviation") is subject to the terms and conditions contained in this Membership Agreement,
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CV HRL
0 0 Thomas G. Foley, Jr., SBN 0 tfoley@foleybezek.com Roger N. Behle, SBN rbehle@foleybezek.com Justin P. Karczag, SBN jkarczag@foleybezek.com FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP West Carrillo Street Santa
More informationTITLE 20 AERONAUTICS
TITLE 20 AERONAUTICS CHAPTERS 1 General Provisions ( 101) 2 General Powers of the Secretary; National Preemption ( 201-202) 3 Organization of Civil Aviation Authority and Powers and Duties of the Secretary
More informationRoom Block Performance Grid Performance grid is based on the current hotels room block and revised by a by the following sliding scale
SAMANTHA KREITZER SEX TAPE PRODUCTION COORDINATOR Hotel Sales Manager: Carolyn Smith Subject: Sex Tape Dear Ms. KREITZER, We are pleased that you have chosen The Revere Hotel Boston Common to host Columbia
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION. In 2016, Plaintiff Grady Aldridge and his wife purchased Carowinds season tickets for
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 3:17-cv-708 GRADY ALDRIDGE, G.A, by his next friend RENEE ALDRIDGE, and M.A., by her next
More informationWHATCOM COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER SUMMARY OF APPEAL AND DECISION
WHATCOM COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER RE: Administrative Appeal ) APL2009-0023 Application for ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT, Wesley and Penny Mussio ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, ) AND DECISION SUMMARY OF APPEAL AND DECISION
More informationluxaviation S.A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS
luxaviation S.A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Carrier is luxaviation S.A. 1.2 Charter is the contract between the Carrier and the Charterer. 1.3 Charterer is any person,
More informationCounsel for Respondent Time Warner Cable Inc. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SUSAN CRAWFORD, Petitioner,
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2016 04:15 PM INDEX NO. 157002/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 133 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationSEASONAL SITE AGREEMENT
SEASONAL SITE AGREEMENT Seasonal Site Agreement (hereafter the Agreement ), effective as of April 15, 2016, made by and between Silver Springs Campsites, Inc. (hereafter SSC ), a corporation duly organized
More informationAttachment 1. Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 41-1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 23
Case 3:15-cv-05150-RBL Document 41-1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 23 Attachment 1 FINAL ORDER & JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - 018 Case 3:15-cv-05150-RBL Document 41-1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 2 of
More informationYOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to Answer the Complaint in this action,
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF HORRY Ally Mulcahy and Jillian McGovern, Plaintiffs, IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS IN THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CASE NO. 2018-CP-26- v. SUMMONS (Jury Trial Demanded) BN
More informationORDER CALLING PUBLIC HEARING TOBE HELD ON MARCH 2, 2016
A regular meeting of the Town Board of the Town of New Windsor, in the County of Orange, New York, was held at the Town Hall, in said Town, on the 3rd day of February, 2016. PRESENT: George A. Green, Supervisor
More informationSADDLE CREEK ENTRANCE (PRIVACY) GATE OPERATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN SADDLE CREEK COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA, INC
SADDLE CREEK ENTRANCE (PRIVACY) GATE OPERATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN SADDLE CREEK COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA, INC This Saddle Creek Privacy Gate Operating Agreement ( Agreement
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-02446 Document 1 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 9 WANG v. Johnson (USCIS-IPO) et al., No. 16-02446 (D. DC 12-15-2016) EB-5 Mandamus Complaint UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DISTRICT
More informationSERVICE AGREEMENT. The Parties agree as follows: 1. SERVICE AGREEMENT:
SERVICE AGREEMENT This Service Agreement (the Service Agreement ) is effective as of the date of purchase of the baggage tracking service product offered by Blue Ribbon Bags, LLC ( Provider ) by, or on
More informationAGENCY AGREEMENT. The definitions used in this agreement have the same meaning as those used in the ATOL Regulations 2012.
AGENCY AGREEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN [...] AND THE TRAVEL TEAM LTD., ATOL NO. 5838 APPOINTING [...] AS THE TRAVEL TEAM LTD'S AGENT PURSUANT TO ATOL REGULATIONS 12 AND 22 Definitions The definitions used
More informationORDINANCE NO. 612, DESCRIPTION ATTACHED
Insert BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN or PAGOSA SPRINGS STATE OF COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 612, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 561, ESTABLISHING THE TOWN OF PAGOSA SPRINGS SANITATION ENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, TO CLARIFY
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants.
STCV0 Electronically FILED by Superior Court Assigned of California, all County purposes of Los to: Angeles Stanley on Mosk 0//0 Courthouse, 0:0 PM Judicial Sherri R. Officer: Carter, Executive Richard
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2011 CA 1144 WASHINGTON PARISH GOVERNMENT VERSUS
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2011 CA 1144 WASHINGTON PARISH GOVERNMENT VERSUS HONORABLE WALTER P REED ST TAMMANY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE AND STATE OF LOUISIANA DIVISION OF
More informationTerms and Conditions applicable to Travel Agencies registered at volaris.com
Terms and Conditions applicable to Travel Agencies registered at volaris.com The AGENCY declares: a) a) For Individuals: The individual is of legal age, with full legal capacity to bind and engage with
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 LISA T. BELENKY (CA Bar No. 0 JUSTIN AUGUSTINE (CA Bar No. CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Broadway Street, Suite 00 Oakland, CA T: ( -0 F: ( -0 E: lbelenky@biologicaldiversity.org
More informationSTATE OF NEW MEXICO S INITIAL DISCLOSURES. The Plaintiff, State of New Mexico ex rel. State Engineer ( State ), hereby makes its
STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF SAN JUAN ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. STATE ENGINEER, v. Plaintiff, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants, CV-75-184 HON. JAMES J. WECHSLER
More informationFinancial Policies Unclaimed Check
Financial Policies Unclaimed Check The purpose of the unclaimed check policy is to provide the proper mechanism to take possession of long standing unclaimed checks in accordance with government statutes
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JASPER COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JASPER COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA KATHIE WYATT, vs., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.: DANIEL ORLANDO VILLANUEVA, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
More informationANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL OF VILLAGES OF VILANO HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA BEACH HOMES AT VILLAGES OF VILANO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida net for profit corporation, CASE NO.: CA09-0179
More informationCity of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. Stacy Thorn, Administrative Services Technician II. Adoption of an Escheatment Policy for Unclaimed Money
City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: March 18, 2013 FROM: SUBJECT: Stacy Thorn, Administrative Services Technician II Adoption of an Escheatment Policy for Unclaimed Money RECOMMENDATION Adopt
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA L- +: i DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D. C.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA L- +: i DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D. C. -- - - - U ;1 Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 5 h day of January, 2007 Montgomery
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/02/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
Case: 1:14-cv-03251 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/02/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1 4803-A MJM; MS055 4803-B MJM; MS056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ILLINOIS
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-123 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING MODEL GLIDER FLYING REGULATIONS FOR LILLY SHAPELL PARK The City Council of the City of Laguna Niguel
More informationGeneral Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) Customer Protection Rights Regulation
General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) Customer Protection Rights Regulation Issued by the Board of Directors of the General Authority of Civil Aviation Resolution No. (20/380) dated 26/5/1438 H (corresponding
More informationAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VACAVILLE ADDING CHAPTER 9
Agenda Item No. January 27, 2009 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, Interim City Manager Rich Word, Chief of Police Scott D. Sexton, Community Development Director
More informationSIXTHMAN THE KISS KRUISE II TICKETING CONTRACT IMPORTANT NOTICE! THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS [COLLECTIVELY, THE CONTRACT ] CONTAIN:
SIXTHMAN THE KISS KRUISE II TICKETING CONTRACT IMPORTANT NOTICE! THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS [COLLECTIVELY, THE CONTRACT ] CONTAIN: (A) THE CONTRACT BETWEEN YOU AND NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES [THE TICKET CONTRACT
More informationThis attorney-client retainer agreement (hereafter referred as Agreement ) is entered into by. between (your name as it appears on passport)
Attorney-Client Retainer Agreement This attorney-client retainer agreement (hereafter referred as Agreement ) is entered into by and between (your name as it appears on passport) (hereafter referred as
More informationIssued by the Department of Transportation on the 28 th day of January, 2016 FINAL ORDER
Order 2016-1-13 Served: January 28, 2016 DEPARTMENT UNITED OF STATES TRANSPORTATION OF AMERICA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the
More informationGeneral Information This brief provides general information on unclaimed property and defines some commonly used terms.
Unclaimed Property Briefs General Information This brief provides general information on unclaimed property and defines some commonly used terms. What is Unclaimed Property? Unclaimed Property is money
More informationSEASONAL CAMPGROUND ADMISSION AGREEMENT
1SEASONAL CAMPER AGREEMENT FOR 2012 (Final) 2 1 SEASONAL CAMPGROUND ADMISSION AGREEMENT 2 3 THIS AGREEMENT IS BETWEEN THE CAMPGROUND,, AND 4THE FOLLOWING PERSONS: 5ADULTS:. 6MINORS:. 7ONLY THE PERSONS
More informationBeaufort County. Hilton Head Island Airport fhxdi, Hilton Head. SC.
TOWER OPERATING AGREEMENT BETWEEN FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) AND Beaufort County. Hilton Head Island Airport fhxdi, Hilton Head. SC. ARTICLE I. PARTIES The parties to this Agreement are the
More informationCARNES CROSSROADS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. CARNES CROSSROADS GREEN BARN RENTAL AGREEMENT
CARNES CROSSROADS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. CARNES CROSSROADS GREEN BARN Address: 207 1 st Avenue Summerville, SC 29486 RENTAL AGREEMENT PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY: Printed Name of Applicant: E-mail address/es:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL
Case 8:18-cv-00220-DOC-KES Document 71 Filed 03/25/18 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:939 Title: ORANGE COUNTY CATHOLIC WORKER ET AL. V. ORANGE COUNTY ET AL. DAVID RAMIREZ ET AL V. THE COUNTY OF ORANGE PRESENT:
More informationThis attorney-client retainer agreement (hereafter referred as Agreement ) is entered into by and. (your name as it appears on passport) (hereafter
Attorney-Client Retainer Agreement This attorney-client retainer agreement (hereafter referred as Agreement ) is entered into by and between (your name as it appears on passport) (hereafter referred as
More informationSIXTHMAN 311 CARIBBEAN CRUISE TICKETING CONTRACT IMPORTANT NOTICE! THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS [COLLECTIVELY, THE CONTRACT ] CONTAIN:
SIXTHMAN 311 CARIBBEAN CRUISE TICKETING CONTRACT IMPORTANT NOTICE! THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS [COLLECTIVELY, THE CONTRACT ] CONTAIN: (A) THE CONTRACT BETWEEN YOU AND CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES [THE TICKET CONTRACT
More informationORDER REQUESTING PROPOSALS
Order 2017-2-4 Served: February 13, 2017 DEPARTMENT UNITED OF STATES TRANSPORTATION OF AMERICA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the
More informationPRIVATE DEED BETWEEN. in ( ) ZIP code Adress No. phone fax. . provided with licence/exercise authorization No. issued by on IATA code
PRIVATE DEED BETWEEN AIR ITALY S.P.A. (Principal) and (Assignee), located in ( ) ZIP code Adress No. in the person of Mr. phone fax e-mail provided with licence/exercise authorization No. issued by on
More informationAGENDA ITEM D4. T:\Board Folders\Board Agenda\Science and Technology\D4 Big Fish Lake Augmentation Agreement
AGENDA ITEM D4 DATE: December 1, 2015 TO: Matt Jordan, General Manager FROM: Alison Adams, Chief Technical Officer SUBJECT: Lake Augmentation Agreement with the Barthle Brothers Ranch, LLC Approve SUMMARY:
More information112th CONGRESS. 1st Session H. R. 113 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
HR 113 IH 112th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 113 To provide for additions to the Cucamonga and Sheep Mountain Wilderness Areas in the Angeles and San Bernardino National Forests and the protection of existing
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY MEDICAL CHECK
TERMS AND CONDITIONS EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY MEDICAL CHECK Many thanks for your interest in a jet fighter flight arrangement. To ensure a flawless flight procedure, it is needed to comply with all formalities
More informationSECTION 2 - GENERAL REGULATIONS
SECTION 2 - GENERAL REGULATIONS 2.01 COMPLIANCE WITH RULES AND REGULATIONS a. Any permission granted by the City, directly or indirectly, expressly, or by implication or otherwise, to any Person to enter
More informationCase 1:13-cv DPW Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:13-cv-11888-DPW Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BLUE HILL HELICOPTERS, LLC, and SJ ROTORCRAFT CORPORATION, C.A. No.: 13-11888
More informationColorado s Compacts. Craig Cotten Division Engineer
Colorado s Compacts Craig Cotten Division Engineer 19 States & Mexico Rely on Colorado Water Methods of Allocating Water Between States Litigation Court Decides Federal Federal Government Decides Agreement
More informationCase 1:13-at Document 2 Filed 07/24/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-at-000 Document Filed 0// Page of Stacy Tolchin (CA SBN #) Law Offices of Stacy Tolchin S. Spring St., Suite Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () - Email: Stacy@Tolchinimmigration.com
More informationRV LOT PROCEDURE. RV1.4 Special circumstances (e.g., hardship, military service) will be addressed on an individual basis.
RV1. Scope RV LOT PROCEDURE RV1.1 This procedure has been established to provide a methodical approach for assigning parking space in the RV Lot to Fairfield residents for their recreational vehicles only
More informationBoise Municipal Code. Chapter DEFINITIONS
Chapter 12-03 DEFINITIONS Sections: 12-03-01 ADMINISTRATOR 12-03-02 AIRPORT DESIGNATIONS 12-03-03 AIRPORT HAZARD 12-03-04 AIRPORT HEIGHT LIMITATIONS 12-03-05 AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT 12-03-06 AIRPORT INSTRUMENT
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants.
1 1 1 0 1 NARANJIBHAI PATEL, et al., vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. CV 0-1 DSF (AJWx FINDINGS OF FACT AND
More informationCITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager
CITY OF PALMDALE REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager DATE: June 4, 2014 SUBJECT: Specific Plan Amendment 14-01; Amending the Use Designation of 23.97 Acres within
More informationAGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER AT THE TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT
AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER AT THE TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT This AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER SERVICES AT TRUCKEE TAHOE AIRPORT ( Agreement ) is made
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER ) 1718 Connecticut Ave., N.W. ) Suite 200 ) Washington, DC 20009 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No.
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS a. Members PRO b. Cancellation of accounts and cards
MELIÁ PRO Rewards (henceforth the Programme, and formally known as the mas amigos) programme, is a Loyalty Programme, operated by Meliá Hotels International, S.A. (formally Sol Meliá, S.A. and, henceforth,
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AERONAUTICS DIVISION CHAPTER LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF AIRPORTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AERONAUTICS DIVISION CHAPTER 1680-1-2 LICENSING AND REGISTRATION OF AIRPORTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1680-1-2-.01 Purpose 1680-1-2-.06 Repealed 1680-1-2-.02 Definitions
More informationApplicant: EUROWINGS LUFTVERKEHRS AG (Eurowings) Date Filed: July 16, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on September 17, 2014 NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET DOT-OST-2009-0106
More informationCase 8:09-cv RAL-TBM Document 131 Filed 05/14/2009 Page 1 of 12
Case 8:09-cv-00087-RAL-TBM Document 131 Filed 05/14/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM
More informationSEABOURN CRUISE LINE 2018 SEABOURN CARIBBEAN CRUISE FOR TWO SWEEPSTAKES
Abbreviated rules: *NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN THE SWEEPSTAKES. A PURCHASE WILL NOT INCREASE YOUR CHANCES OF WINNING. Open to legal residents of the 50 United States, D.C. and Canada (excluding
More informationAction Recommendation: Budget Impact:
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 20190120 Legistar File ID 3/5/2019 City Council Meeting Date Agenda Item Only N/A for NonAgenda Item Tim Nyander 2/13/2019 WATER SEWER (720) Submitted By Submitted
More information2013 SEABOURN SEABOURN 25 TH ANNIVERSARY SWEEPSTAKES
2013 SEABOURN SEABOURN 25 TH ANNIVERSARY SWEEPSTAKES OFFICIAL RULES NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. OPEN ONLY TO TRAVEL AGENTS WHO ARE LEGAL RESIDENTS OF THE 50 UNITED STATES, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND CANADA
More informationREGULATIONS FOR DECLARATION AND DISPOSAL OF UNCLAIMED ITEMS OF THE PIRAEUS CONTAINER TERMINAL S.A. IN THE PIRAEUS FREE ZONE
REGULATIONS FOR DECLARATION AND DISPOSAL OF UNCLAIMED ITEMS OF THE PIRAEUS CONTAINER TERMINAL S.A. IN THE PIRAEUS FREE ZONE Article 1 Goods declared unclaimed deadlines Goods unloaded and received by the
More informationTHE CHICAGO CONVENTION AS A SOURCE OF INTERNATIOINAL AIR LAW
THE CHICAGO CONVENTION AS A SOURCE OF INTERNATIOINAL AIR LAW Professor Dr. Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright 2015 by Paul Stephen Dempsey. Sources
More informationAN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE CAMP FIRE DISASTER RECOVERY TEMPORARY HOUSING ORDINANCE: 4/5 VOTE REQUIRED
1 2 Ordinance No. 0 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE CAMP FIRE DISASTER RECOVERY TEMPORARY HOUSING ORDINANCE: / VOTE REQUIRED The Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte ordains as 7 follows:
More informationCase 3:18-cv DRD Document Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Case 3:18-cv-01550-DRD Document 16-10 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 10 A.E. RODRIGUEZ, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO Plaintiff, v. No. 3:18-CV-1550-DRD GLOCK, INC, Defendant.
More informationPage 1 sur 19 LFTH
Page 1 sur 19 Table of contents CONTACTS...3 INVOICING AND PAYMENT CONDITIONS...4 INVOICING...5 TARIFFS...5 PAYMENT CONDITIONS...5 PROCEDURE IN THE EVENT OF LATE PAYMENT OR NON-PAYMENT...6 ORIGINAL VERSION,
More informationCase 3:15-cv K Document 1 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 83 PageID 1
Case 3:15-cv-02069-K Document 1 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 83 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CITY OF DALLAS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.
More informationLJN: BN2126,Subdistrict section Court in Haarlem, / CV EXPL
LJN: BN2126,Subdistrict section Court in Haarlem, 395168 / CV EXPL 08-10281 Printout of judgment Date of judgment: 15/07/10 Date of publication: 22/07/10 Legal area: Civil, other Type of proceedings: First
More informationWW CRUISE Australia & New Zealand - Terms & Conditions
WW CRUISE Australia & New Zealand - Terms & Conditions WW Cruise IMPORTANT NOTICE! PLEASE REMEMBER ALL PAYMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE CANCELLATION POLICY THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS (COLLECTIVELY, THE CONTRACT
More informationAIRPORT NOISE AND CAPACITY ACT OF 1990
AIRPORT NOISE AND CAPACITY ACT OF 1990 P. 479 AIRPORT NOISE AND CAPACITY ACT OF 1990 SEC. 9301. SHORT TITLE This subtitle may be cited as the Airport Noise and /Capacity Act of 1990. [49 U.S.C. App. 2151
More information