Supreme Court of New South Wales
|
|
- Delphia Lawson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback] Supreme Court of New South Wales You are here: AustLII >> Databases >> Supreme Court of New South Wales >> 2015 >> [2015] NSWSC 734 [Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Context] [No Context] [Help] Casey v Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd; Helm v Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 734 (12 June 2015) Last Updated: 12 June 2015 Supreme Court New South Wales Case Name: Casey v Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd; Helm v Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd (No 2) Medium Neutral Citation: [2015] NSWSC 734 Hearing Date(s): 10 June 2015 Date of Orders: 12 June 2015 Decision Date: 12 June 2015 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: Issue resolved in favour of Dr Helm and the following orders made: 1. Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the amount of $959, Note that of the judgment sum in order 1 the defendant has 1 of 6 22/06/ :02 AM
2 already paid the sum of $12, by way of repayment of workers compensation benefits paid to the plaintiff, in partial satisfaction of the judgment. 3. Payment of $197,216 of the judgment is stayed pending the resolution of any appeal filed by the defendant. 4. The balance of the judgment sum namely $762,262 be paid on or before 25 June Directions 5. The defendant to file and serve written submissions on the question of costs within 2 days of judgment being delivered. 6. The plaintiff to file and serve any submissions in reply within 4 days of judgment being delivered. 7. The Court is to determine the question of costs on the papers. Catchwords: PROCEDURE judgment and orders effect of judgments whether judgment contains error as to the calculation of future economic loss no error Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Casey v Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd; Helm v Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 566 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: Karen Casey David Helm Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd Representation: Counsel: Mr FS McIlwaine SC with Mr ER Graham (Plaintiffs) Mr D Lloyd (Defendant) Solicitors: 2 of 6 22/06/ :02 AM
3 3 of 6 22/06/ :02 AM JUDGMENT 1. I gave judgment in these matters on 15 May 2015, finding in each case for the plaintiff (see Casey v Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd; Helm v Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 566). 2. On 10 June 2015, the parties reported that agreement as to orders reflecting the judgment had largely been reached in both cases. 3. That day the parties advanced various documents, which were marked: mfi 14 - Defendant s proposed short minutes in relation to Dr Helm mfi 15 - Defendant s submissions in support of Order 1 of the Defendant s proposed short minutes of order in relation to Dr Helm mfi 16 - Defendant s proposed short minutes of orders in relation to Ms Casey 4. There was an error in the mfi and exhibit list which came to light after the directions hearing, which resulted in those documents being incorrectly marked. Those mfis have accordingly be remarked mfi 16, 17 and 18 respectively. The parties will be provided with a revised list to reflect those changes. Ms Casey 5. In Ms Casey s case, I made orders on 10 June which quantified the sum Pel-Air was to pay her, which had been agreed subject to quantification of that part of the order which reflects damages for funds management, which depends on other proceedings presently on foot before the Court. A stay of part of the judgment sum was also agreed and I made orders reflecting that agreement, together with an order requiring Pel-Air to pay Ms Casey the balance of the judgment sum by 24 June Pel-Air did not consent to that latter order, which was sought by Ms Casey, but I considered it a just basis on which the stay agreed should be granted, having in mind not only what finally had to be resolved in her case at the hearing in February 2015, but also the time that has elapsed since the May judgment was given and the consequence of the judgment, once entered, for payments Ms Casey is currently receiving for her considerable ongoing medical needs, from the Workers Compensation insurer. 7. The question of costs must also be determined. That must await finalisation of the funds management question. Ms Casey s case is thus adjourned to 1 July 2015 at 9.30 am for further directions. The parties have liberty to approach if that date proves to be inconvenient. Dr Helm Everett Evans (Plaintiffs) GSG Legal (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/ /46508 Publication Restriction: None 8. In Dr Helm s case agreement as to the orders to be made was also largely reached. There is, however, an issue between the parties as to whether the May judgment contains an error as to the calculation of Dr Helm s future economic loss, which can be corrected in accordance with the powers granted by Rule or of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005.
4 4 of 6 22/06/ :02 AM 9. Pel-Air contended that I had misunderstood the parties submissions, with the result that an error was made, which ought to be corrected by substituting the figure $3,354 appearing at [366] of the judgment, with the figure $2, Dr Helm contended that there was no error and that I had correctly understood and accepted the case advanced on his behalf, as to the proper construction of s 12 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) and its application to his circumstances. It was only if some clerical error was identified that the judgment could be corrected. There had not been any such error and accordingly, Pel-Air would have to pursue its case on this issue, on appeal. 11. It is the resulting difference, of $197,216, which is the subject of the agreed stay. The conclusion which I reach about this issue has an impact on the cases which the parties wish to advance in relation to costs. 12. The parties various written submissions on quantum in Dr Helm s case were marked mfi 6 (Dr Helm s submissions); mfi 10 (Pel-Air s submissions); mfi 11 (Pel-Air s submissions); mfi 12 (Pel-Air s schedule future economic loss); mfi 13 (Dr Helm s schedule commercial assistance and certain future treatment expenses); mfi 14 (Dr Helm s schedule other future treatment expenses). Further submissions were sent by for Dr Helm on 9 February; by Pel-Air, in response to mfi 13 and 14 on 23 February, with a further response for Dr Helm sent on 12 March. 13. In Pel-Air s 23 February submissions, the dispute was clearly identified to be between the figure $3,354 and $2,314, Pel-Air arguing that the $3,354 figure had not been adjusted for tax. Extracts from ABS statistics and Table 11A Average weekly earnings were attached, but what they purported to establish was not there explained. This was a response to the 9 February submission for Dr Helm that: 1. The purpose of S 12 (2) is to provide the mechanism by which the cap on the level of weekly earnings which can be used by the Court to calculate economic loss is determined. 2. The cap is 3 times the average weekly earnings at the date of the award, in this case fixed at $3354 per week. This sum is agreed between the parties. 3. The sub section directs the court to disregard the amount, if any, by which the Plaintiff s gross weekly earnings exceed the cap. 4. In this case the Plaintiff s gross and after tax weekly earnings exceed the cap. 5. The after tax weekly earnings are $A3,580 per week. But for S 12 (2) this sum would be used to calculate future economic loss. 6. However because of S 12 (2) the Court must disregard the amount above the cap and calculate future economic loss on the basis of the cap, $A3,354, as has been done in the Plaintiff s submissions set out in MFI For the foregoing reasons it is submitted that the method postulated by the Defendant in its revised submissions on future economic loss should not be followed. 14. In the May judgment I said: 362 It was agreed that the figure representing three times the relevant average weekly earnings was $3, There is no issue about this. I then observed: 363 Originally Dr Helm s damages were calculated by reference to his estimated gross weekly salary of $3,580 (see paragraph 8 of mfi 6). Accepting the figures at paragraph 8 of mfi 6, Pel-Air calculated that his net salary, after deduction of British tax, was $3,614 and submitted that, accordingly, s 12 required that his loss from age 60 be calculated by reference to $3,354 (paragraph 1 of mfi 10). 16. It had been submitted for Pel-Air at paragraph 1 of mfi 10 that the figure of $3,614 had to be:
5 5 of 6 22/06/ :02 AM... reduced to 3 x the average weekly earnings for all employees in New South Wales: Civil Liability Act s.12(2) and s.12(3). That figure as at May 2014 which appears to be the latest date that the figures were available was $1,118. That produces a weekly figure of $3, I then observed in the May judgment: 364 Dr Helm then conceded that in accordance with s 12, these damages had to be calculated by reference to the figure of $3,354 per week (see mfi 13 and 14). 18. At mfi 13, that figure was adopted in Dr Helm s calculation, because of the cap provided by s 12CLA. 19. I then observed in the May judgment as to Pel-Air s 23 February submissions in relation to mfi 13 and 14: 365 Pel-Air then submitted in response to mfi 13 and 14, that these damages should be calculated by reference to a net figure of $2,314, said to have been calculated in accordance with paragraph 1 of mfi 10. No reference was made to such a figure in mfi 10. How that figure was calculated is not revealed by what was submitted there. Reference was also made in Pel-Air s response to ABS statistics and an average weekly earnings table attached to the submission. How those documents relate to the calculation of the figure of $2,314, is not apparent. 20. In its written submissions on the alleged error (mfi 15), it was submitted by Pel-Air that the submissions advanced at paragraph 1 in mfi 11 had been overlooked, where it was said:... Accepting the calculations in paragraph 8 of the Plaintiffs submissions, his earnings for that period could be expected to have been 150,000 gross per year. However, CLA s.12 provides that any amount by which the Plaintiffs gross weekly earnings would have exceeded 3 x the amount of average weekly earnings is not recoverable. 3 x the amount of average weekly earnings at the relevant date is $3,354. That figure operates as the cap on an award to the Plaintiff. That amount annualised and converted to English pounds is 88,948. On United Kingdom tax scales that would be taxed at 20% on the first 31,865 (tax of 6,373) and 40% on the next 57,055 ( 22,822). That is, total tax of 27,195 resulting in 61,725 net per annum. That may be expressed in weekly terms as 1,187 per annum. At the current exchange rate ( 1 = $1.95) that is, $2,314 per week. 21. It was also argued in mfi 15 that I had proceeded on the misapprehension that the $3,354 figure was the net figure, I having concluded at [366] of the May judgment that: 366 I consider that the submissions advanced for Dr Helm as to the proper construction of s 12 of the Civil Liability Act are correct. In calculating these damages s 12 requires any amount by which Dr Helm s gross weekly earnings would, but for his injuries, have exceeded $3,354, be ignored. That is a figure less than Dr Helm s net salary would be, after tax, but for his injury. Accordingly, $3,354 is the figure by reference to which these damages must be calculated. 22. The view that $3,354 was a figure less than Dr Helm s net salary would be, after tax, but for his injury, rested on an acceptance of the submission advanced for Dr Helm on 9 February, that his after tax weekly earnings in the UK would at the relevant time have been $A3,580. It was common ground that this aspect of Dr Helm s damages had to be assessed by reference to net figures. But for the effect of s 12, Dr Helm s damages would have been calculated on that net figure.
6 6 of 6 22/06/ :02 AM 23. Section 12(2) however requires the Court to disregard the amount (if any) by which the claimant s gross weekly earnings would (but for the injury or death) have exceeded an amount that is 3 times the amount of average weekly earnings at the date of the award. This required that any amount in excess of $3,354 had to be ignored. Accordingly, I concluded that the difference between that figure and the net figure $A3,580 had to be ignored when damages were calculated. I did not, however, accept that s 12(2) required the sum of $A3,580 to be further reduced, by application of notional tax, as had been argued in mfi True it is that I did not specify in paragraphs [365] and [366] of the May judgment that it was mfi 11, where Pel-Air had advanced the argument that there had to be a further deduction for tax, from the $3,354 figure, as there calculated, to arrive at the $2,314 figure. That argument was however dealt with and rejected in the May judgment. As I there explained, Pel-Air s approach to the construction and application of s 12 in Dr Helm s case could not be accepted. The section did not require the agreed sum of $3,354 to be reduced, by deduction of an amount reflecting notional tax, as calculated by Pel-Air. Rather, it did not permit damages to be assessed at a figure exceeding $3,354, which was calculated on a gross basis. If that figure needed to be calculated on a net basis, as Pel-Air submitted was necessary, s 12(2) would have said so. 25. Accordingly, this issue must be resolved in favour of Dr Helm and the following orders made: 1. Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the amount of $959, Note that of the judgment sum in order 1 the defendant has already paid the sum of $12, by way of repayment of workers compensation benefits paid to the plaintiff, in partial satisfaction of the judgment. 3. Payment of $197,216 of the judgment is stayed pending the resolution of any appeal filed by the defendant. 4. The balance of the judgment sum namely $762,262 be paid on or before 25 June Directions 5. The defendant to file and serve written submissions on the question of costs within 2 days of judgment being delivered. 6. The plaintiff to file and serve any submissions in reply within 4 days of judgment being delivered. 7. The Court is to determine the question of costs on the papers. 26. These orders also impose an obligation on Pel-Air to pay that part of what has been ordered which is not subject to the agreed stay, within 14 days. This, I consider is also a just basis on which the agreed stay should be granted in Dr Helm s case, given what had finally to be resolved in his case at the hearing in February, the time that has elapsed since the May judgment was given and Dr Helm s impending return to the UK. 27. In his case, the parties propose to file written submissions on costs, which are accordingly also reserved. ********** AustLII: Copyright Policy Disclaimers Privacy Policy Feedback URL:
Cathay Pacific Airways Limited Abridged Financial Statements
To provide shareholders with information on the results and financial position of the Group s significant listed associated company, Cathay Pacific Airways Limited, the following is a summary of its audited
More informationBas Jacob Adriaan Krijgsman v Surinaamse Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (Case C-302/16)
Bas Jacob Adriaan Krijgsman v Surinaamse Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (Case C-302/16) 1 The present request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 5(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
More informationWorkers compensation benefits guide
Workers compensation benefits guide April 2013 Disclaimer This publication may contain work health and safety and workers compensation information. It may include some of your obligations under the various
More informationI TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA2/2018 [2018] NZCA 256. KAMLESH PRASAD First Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA2/2018 [2018] NZCA 256 BETWEEN AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Applicant KAMLESH PRASAD First Respondent LIUTOFAGA TULAI Second Respondent
More informationIN THE PORTSMOUTH COUNTY COURT. Before: DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE ALEXANDRE. - and -
IN THE PORTSMOUTH COUNTY COURT No. B4QZ05E1 Winston Churchill Avenue Portsmouth PO1 2EB Thursday, 22 nd October 2015 Before: DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE ALEXANDRE B E T W E E N : JOHN WALLACE Claimant - and
More information1 July I. General remarks
Briefly on Advance on Costs under the SCC Rules Celeste Salinas Quero, SCC associate counsel I. General remarks Under Article 43 SCC Rules, the Costs of the Arbitration consist of (i) the fees of the arbitral
More informationReports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 22 November 2012 *
Reports of Cases JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 22 November 2012 * (Air transport Montreal Convention Article 22(2) Liability of carriers in respect of baggage Limits of liability in the event of
More informationAirline Management Letter 3/1/2009
Airline Management Letter Letter 3/1/2009 Ninth Circuit Holds that that RLA RLA Does Does not not Pre-empt Employees' State State Law Claims The Ninth Circuit has held that the Railway Labor Act (RLA)
More informationRevision of the Third Air Package
Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Revision of the Third Air Package Recitals to note Recital 5 states that, To ensure consistent monitoring of the compliance with the requirements of the operating
More informationCathay Pacific Airways Limited Abridged Financial Statements
To provide shareholders with information on the results and financial position of the Group s significant listed associated company, Cathay Pacific Airways Limited, the following is a summary of its audited
More informationAnnex 5: Technical Terms and Conditions for Lot IV: Committee of the Regions
Annex 5: Technical Terms and Conditions for Lot IV: Committee of the Regions Table of Contents 1 Booking transport, accommodation and related services 2 2 Chartered transport 2 3 Issuing and delivering
More informationCode of Conduct and ADR Annual Report 2017/2018
Issued: October 2018 Code of Conduct and ADR Annual Report 2017/2018 The Code of Conduct applies to all ABTA Members and is central to achieving ABTA s aims, in particular delivering higher standards for
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No CV-CMA.
[DO NOT PUBLISH] WANDA KRUPSKI, a single person, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-16569 Non-Argument Calendar D. C. Docket No. 08-60152-CV-CMA versus COSTA CRUISE LINES,
More informationOperation of the UK Traffic Distribution Rules in relation to all-cargo services at London Gatwick Airport. Consultation paper by BAA Gatwick
Operation of the UK Traffic Distribution Rules in relation to all-cargo services at London Gatwick Airport Consultation paper by BAA Gatwick Introduction 1. This paper seeks the views of interested parties
More informationECC-Net involvement in Air Passenger Rights. Bianca Schulz, ECC France Stakeholder conference on Air Passenger Rights, Brussels, 30 May 2012
ECC-Net involvement in Air Passenger Rights Bianca Schulz, ECC France Stakeholder conference on Air Passenger Rights, Brussels, 30 May 2012 The ECC-Net - Created in 2005 by the fusion of two former networks
More informationCIVIL AVIATION (JERSEY) LAW 2008
CIVIL AVIATION (JERSEY) LAW 2008 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2016 This is a revised edition of the law Civil Aviation (Jersey) Law 2008 Arrangement CIVIL AVIATION (JERSEY) LAW 2008
More informationCAA Strategy and Policy
CAA Strategy and Policy Ms Tamara Goodwin Senior Air Services Negotiator Department for Transport Great Minster House Zone 1/26 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR 14 July 2017 Dear Tamara APPLICATION BY
More information9820/1/14 REV 1 GL/kl 1 DGE 2 A
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 26 May 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0072 (COD) 9820/1/14 REV 1 AVIATION 112 CONSOM 115 CODEC 1288 REPORT From: To: General Secretariat of the Council
More informationSamsung Electronics Australia Qantas Frequent Flyer Loyalty Program Rewards Scheme. Terms and Conditions. Effective: 22 March 2018
Samsung Electronics Australia Qantas Frequent Flyer Loyalty Program Rewards Scheme Terms and Conditions Effective: 22 March 2018 1. Introduction 1.1 This Samsung Electronics Australia Qantas Frequent Flyer
More informationThe Airport Charges Regulations 2011
The Airport Charges Regulations 2011 CAA Annual Report 2013 14 CAP 1210 The Airport Charges Regulations 2011 CAA Annual Report 2013 14 Civil Aviation Authority 2014 All rights reserved. Copies of this
More informationDecision Enacting the Law on Salaries and Other Compensations in Judicial and Prosecutorial Institutions at the Level of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Decision Enacting the Law on Salaries and Other Compensations in Judicial and Prosecutorial Institutions at the Level of Bosnia and Herzegovina In the exercise of the powers vested in the High Representative
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2011 CA 1144 WASHINGTON PARISH GOVERNMENT VERSUS
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2011 CA 1144 WASHINGTON PARISH GOVERNMENT VERSUS HONORABLE WALTER P REED ST TAMMANY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE AND STATE OF LOUISIANA DIVISION OF
More informationCase 1:16-cv JL Document 10 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Case 1:16-cv-00290-JL Document 10 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ZAP D GAMES, L.L.C., a ) New York Limited Liability Company; ) ZEV SHLASINGER,
More informationCode of Conduct Annual Report 2016/2017
Issued: September 2017 Code of Conduct Annual Report 2016/2017 The Code of Conduct applies to all ABTA Members and is central to achieving ABTA s aims, in particular delivering higher standards for customers
More informationTHE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CANCELLATION AND LONG DELAY UNDER EU REGULATION 261/2004
[2010] T RAVEL L AW Q UARTERLY 31 THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CANCELLATION AND LONG DELAY UNDER EU REGULATION 261/2004 Christiane Leffers This is a commentary on the judgment of the European Court of Justice
More informationNepal s Accession to the Montreal Convention and its Applicable
Nepal s Accession to the Montreal Convention and its Applicable Liability Regime The Montreal Convention is a completely new treaty which provides a complete package. --BY DEVENDRA PRADHAN On August 23,
More informationCITIZEN POTAWATOMI NATION HEALING TO WELLNESS COURT ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURE TITLE 15
CITIZEN POTAWATOMI NATION HEALING TO WELLNESS COURT ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURE TITLE 15 CHAPTER SECTION 1 HEALING TO WELLNESS COURT ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURE Citation 101 Establishment of Healing
More informationLJN: BN2126,Subdistrict section Court in Haarlem, / CV EXPL
LJN: BN2126,Subdistrict section Court in Haarlem, 395168 / CV EXPL 08-10281 Printout of judgment Date of judgment: 15/07/10 Date of publication: 22/07/10 Legal area: Civil, other Type of proceedings: First
More informationAttachment 1. Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 41-1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 23
Case 3:15-cv-05150-RBL Document 41-1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 23 Attachment 1 FINAL ORDER & JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT - 018 Case 3:15-cv-05150-RBL Document 41-1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 2 of
More informationMEMBERSHIP, ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COMPANY
GENERAL These terms and conditions shall apply to the Finnair Corporate Programme (hereinafter Programme ). Apart from these terms and conditions, no other rules are applicable. The Programme is designed
More informationAlternative Dispute Resolution
Alternative Dispute Resolution Airline workshop Civil Aviation Authority 30 September 2014 Background to the Study The European Union Directive 2013/11/EU on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) for consumer
More informationRegulation 261/2004 denied boarding, cancellation and delay. Italian experience
Regulation 261/2004 denied boarding, cancellation and delay Italian experience BRUSSELS, 22 OCTOBER 2010 HOTEL BRISTOL STEPHANIE WWW.STUDIOPIERALLINI.IT Legislation - Italian Law no. 12 dated as of 10
More informationGeneral Conditions of Carriage for Rail Passengers (GCC-CIV/PRR)
Edition 1 October 2017 With track changes General Conditions of Carriage for Rail Passengers (GCC-CIV/PRR) Applicable with effect from 3 December 2009 (replace the edition of 1 July 2006) GCC-CIV/PRR 2017-10-01
More informationREGULATIONS FOR DECLARATION AND DISPOSAL OF UNCLAIMED ITEMS OF THE PIRAEUS CONTAINER TERMINAL S.A. IN THE PIRAEUS FREE ZONE
REGULATIONS FOR DECLARATION AND DISPOSAL OF UNCLAIMED ITEMS OF THE PIRAEUS CONTAINER TERMINAL S.A. IN THE PIRAEUS FREE ZONE Article 1 Goods declared unclaimed deadlines Goods unloaded and received by the
More informationAugust Briefing. Why airport expansion is bad for regional economies
August 2005 Briefing Why airport expansion is bad for regional economies 1 Summary The UK runs a massive economic deficit from air travel. Foreign visitors arriving by air spent nearly 11 billion in the
More informationDECISIONS ON AIR TRANSPORT LICENCES AND ROUTE LICENCES 4/99
UNITED KINGDOM CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY DECISIONS ON AIR TRANSPORT LICENCES AND ROUTE LICENCES 4/99 Decision of the Authority on its proposal to vary licence 1B/10 held by British Airways Plc and licence
More informationARMATS ARMENIAN AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION
Tel: (37410) 292929/308 AFTN: UDDDYOYX E-mail: publication@armats.am ARMATS ARMENIAN AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES AIC A 02/18 07 DEC 17 REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA GENERAL DEPARTMENT
More informationPublic Bill Committee Considerations for the Financial Claims and Guidance Bill Thomas Cook Group Response February 2018
Public Bill Committee Considerations for the Financial Claims and Guidance Bill Thomas Cook Group Response February 2018 Thomas Cook Group would like to take this opportunity to thank the Public Bill Committee
More informationMaritime Passenger Rights
Maritime Passenger Rights Information for passengers on their rights when travelling by sea and inland waterway (Regulation (EU) No. 1177/2010) Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport PLEASE NOTE THIS
More informationPART III ALTERNATIVE TRADING SYSTEM (SPA)
PART III ALTERNATIVE TRADING SYSTEM (SPA) TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III ALTERNATIVE TRADING SYSTEM (SPA) TABLE OF CONTENTS... CHAPTER I DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS... I/1 CHAPTER II MEMBERSHIP... II/1
More informationOPEN SKIES TREATY Last Updated 2/18/10 Compiled by Dave Harris
OPEN SKIES TREATY Last Updated 2/18/10 Compiled by Dave Harris mothflyer@gmail.com The following was excerpted from Wikipedia. The Legislative Committee does not necessarily endorse or agree with some
More informationluxaviation S.A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS
luxaviation S.A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 Carrier is luxaviation S.A. 1.2 Charter is the contract between the Carrier and the Charterer. 1.3 Charterer is any person,
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Eighth Chamber) 7 September 2017 (*)
Provisional text JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Eighth Chamber) 7 September 2017 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling Transport Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 Article 7(1) Common rules on compensation and assistance
More informationSTANSTED AIRPORT PLANNING APPLICATION UTT/18/0460/FUL SECTION 106 CONDITIONS TO BE REQUIRED IF PLANNING APPLICATION IS APPROVED
STANSTED MOUNTFITCHET PARISH COUNCIL STANSTED AIRPORT PLANNING APPLICATION UTT/18/0460/FUL SECTION 106 S TO BE REQUIRED IF PLANNING APPLICATION IS APPROVED 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Stansted Mountfitchet Parish
More informationNO COMPENSATION PAYMENTS PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EC) No. 261/2004 IN CASE OF STRIKES?
[2012] T RAVEL L AW Q UARTERLY 275 NO COMPENSATION PAYMENTS PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EC) No. 261/2004 IN CASE OF STRIKES? Katharina-Sarah Meigel & Ulrich Steppler In this article the authors provide hope,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO MADISON COUNTY. : O P I N I O N - vs - 6/22/2015 :
[Cite as W. Jefferson v. Cammelleri, 2015-Ohio-2463.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO MADISON COUNTY VILLAGE OF WEST JEFFERSON, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2014-04-012 : O P I N
More informationINTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW. (Beijing, 30 August 10 September 2010) ICAO LEGAL COMMITTEE 1
DCAS Doc No. 5 15/7/10 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIR LAW (Beijing, 30 August 10 September 2010) ICAO LEGAL COMMITTEE 1 OPTIONS PAPER FOR AMENDMENT OF ARTICLE 4 OF THE MONTREAL CONVENTION (Presented by
More informationTender Notice for Hotel Layover Services
Tender Notice for Hotel Layover Services PIA requires hotel accommodation services from 2, 3, 4 star hotels for its transit and delayed flight economy class passengers at Lahore. Tendering will be done
More informationClaudia Wegener v Royal Air Maroc SA (Case C-537/17)
Claudia Wegener v Royal Air Maroc SA (Case C-537/17) Judgment 1 This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament
More informationQantas Premier Credit Card Rewards Terms and Conditions
Qantas Premier Credit Card Rewards Terms and Conditions November 2017 Qantas Premier Platinum Credit Card Qantas Premier Everyday Credit Card TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Meaning of Words 3 2. Participation
More informationIN THE MATTER OF. SCOTTISH WIDOWS LIMITED (Transferor) and. RL360 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (Transferee)
IN THE ROYAL COURT OF GUERNSEY ORDINARY DIVISION IN THE MATTER OF SCOTTISH WIDOWS LIMITED (Transferor) and RL360 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (Transferee) AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 44 OF THE
More information-and- CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY. -and- (1) SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT (2) GATWICK AIRPORT LIMITED (3) NATS EN ROUTE PLC Interested Parties
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT In the matter of a claim for judicial review B E T W E E N: THE QUEEN On the application of MARTIN BARRAUD -and- Claim No. CO/1063/2015
More informationAPPARENT BIAS IN THE COMPETITION COMISSION?
COMPETITION LAW APPARENT BIAS IN THE COMPETITION COMISSION? BAA LTD V competition commission and ryanair ltd [2010] ewca civ 1097 LAURA ELIZABETH JOHN NOVEMBER 2010 The Court of Appeal has restored the
More informationUAB Avion Express FAMILY ASSISTANCE PLAN
UAB Avion Express FAMILY ASSISTANCE PLAN 1. Overview 1.1. The purpose of the UAB Avion Express Family Assistance Plan is to provide company personnel with the guidelines, procedures and training that will
More informationJON-MARC LARUE ZITZKAT ATTORNEY AT LAW
Jon-Marc LaRue Zitzkat jonmarc@zitzkat.com JON-MARC LARUE ZITZKAT ATTORNEY AT LAW 111 SIMSBURY ROAD, STE. 9 AVON, CONNECTICUT 06001-3763 PHONE: (860) 404-2333 FAX: (860) 404-5542 WWW.ZITZKAT.COM I-485
More informationARMATS ARMENIAN AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION
Tel: (37410) 593045 Fax: (37410) 284916 AFTN: UDDDYOYX E-mail: publication@armats.com ARMATS ARMENIAN AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES AIC A 01/16 10 DEC 15 REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA GENERAL
More informationCriteria for an application for and grant of, or a variation to, an ATOL: fitness, competence and Accountable Person
Consumer Protection Group Air Travel Organisers Licensing Criteria for an application for and grant of, or a variation to, an ATOL: fitness, competence and Accountable Person ATOL Policy and Regulations
More informationORDER REQUESTING PROPOSALS
Order 2017-2-4 Served: February 13, 2017 DEPARTMENT UNITED OF STATES TRANSPORTATION OF AMERICA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the
More informationThe Collection and Use of Safety Information
Page 1 of 1 1. Purpose and Scope... 2 2. Authority... 2 3. References... 2 4. Records... 2 5. Policy... 2 5.1 Context... 2 5.2 Issues Relevant to this Policy... 3 5.3 Civil Aviation Rules and Advisory
More informationApproved by Qantas Chairman (under Board delegation) 18 August 2009 QANTAS DEFERRED SHARE PLAN 2009 PERFORMANCE SHARE PLAN RULES
QANTAS DEFERRED SHARE PLAN The following Rules of the Qantas Deferred Share Plan (Plan) are subject to, and must be read in conjunction with, the Terms & Conditions of the Plan (Terms & Conditions) and
More informationCOMMISSION DECISION. of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14.7.2017 C(2017) 4932 final COMMISSION DECISION of 14.7.2017 ON STATE AID CASE SA.29064 (2011/C) (ex 2011/NN) Ireland - non-application of the Air Travel Tax to transit and
More informationAIRLINE SCHEME RULES. (Updated July 2017)
1 AIRLINE SCHEME RULES (Updated July 2017) INTRODUCTION AviationADR is an independent non-statutory organisation which is approved by the Civil Aviation Authority as an authorised ADR provider. The AviationADR
More informationNo entries will be accepted outside this time.
TERMS & CONDITIONS Schedule to Terms & Conditions of entry Promotion name Win a free UTA 2020 race entry plus 5 pairs of AERODAKS Eligible States/Territories/Cou ntries Worldwide Duration of promotion
More informationCOUNCIL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE REVIEW - DRAFT REORGANISATION ORDER
BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC REPORT Report to: COUNCIL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Report of: Service Director Localisation Date of Decision: 17 November 2015 SUBJECT: COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE REVIEW -
More informationCompany migration to and from Guernsey
JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE GUERNSEY BRIEFING February 2013 Company migration to and from Guernsey Part VII of the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 as amended (the "Law") allows companies to migrate
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0044p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SPA RENTAL, LLC, dba MSI Aviation, v. Petitioner,
More informationCase 3:08-cv JSW Document 1 Filed 07/17/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 3:08-cv-03446-JSW Document 1 Filed 07/17/2008 Page 1 of 8 Shah Peerally (CA Bar No: 230818) Erich Keefe (CA Bar No: 226746) LAW OFFICES OF SHAH PEERALLY 4510 Peralta Blvd, Suite 25 Fremont, CA 94536
More informationAir France KLM ADM Policy In compliance with IATA resolution 850m
Applicable as from January 2018 issuances Air France KLM ADM Policy - Letter for external communication to Travel Agents In accordance with IATA resolution 850m 1. General Scope policies ensure fare rules
More informationAdvice for brokers about the ATOL Regulations and the ATOL scheme
Consumers and Markets Group Consumer Protection Air Travel Organiser s Licensing Advice for brokers about the ATOL Regulations and the ATOL scheme ATOL Policy and Regulations 2017/02 Published by the Civil
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants.
1 1 1 0 1 NARANJIBHAI PATEL, et al., vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. CV 0-1 DSF (AJWx FINDINGS OF FACT AND
More informationMs J Delouche Sea View Cottage Cliff Road Margrave-on-Sea MUDHOLE ML20 7AX 15 October 2015
Hazy Beacon District Council Chief Executive s Department Town Hall St Nicholas Street Mudhole ML16 3BY Ms J Delouche Sea View Cottage Cliff Road Margrave-on-Sea MUDHOLE ML20 7AX 15 October 2015 Dear Mr
More informationBEST PRACTICES GUIDE v1.0
BEST PRACTICES GUIDE v.0 INTRODUCTION The ADM User Group (formerly known as the ADM Working Group) was established in 06 in accordance with the requirements set by the Passenger Agency Conference Steering
More informationStatistics and Accounting Guide
Statistics and Accounting Guide January 2017 edition Contact: Mr Philippe Grondein (philippe.grondein@upu.int) Remuneration Programme Markets Development and Regulation Directorate UPU International Bureau
More information2013 ANNUAL REPORT AIRLINE CUSTOMER ADVOCATE 1 JANUARY - 31 DECEMBER. airlinecustomeradvocate.com.au
AIRLINE CUSTOMER ADVOCATE 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 1 JANUARY - 31 DECEMBER This Annual Report contains details about the total number of Eligible Complaints received and finalised by the Airline Customer Advocate,
More informationLaudaMotion GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS (GTCB) VERSION OF LAUDAMOTION GMBH
LaudaMotion GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS (GTCB) VERSION 01-2007 OF LAUDAMOTION GMBH 1. LEGAL REGULATIONS AND TERMS 1.1 The following General Terms and Conditions of Business (GTCB) and all
More informationmyjet2 Terms & Conditions myjet2 Jet2.com
myjet2 Terms & Conditions myjet2 Jet2.com As of 00:01 on 10th April 2013 these terms and conditions implement significant changes to the structure and operation of the myjet2 programme. These Terms and
More informationFINNAIR Corporate Programme Terms of agreement UNITED KINGDOM GENERAL
UNITE KINGOM GENERAL These terms and conditions shall apply to the Finnair Corporate Programme (hereinafter Programme ). Apart from these terms and conditions, no other rules are applicable. The Programme
More informationBHP Billiton Group Management Award Plan Conditional Awards FY15 Terms and Conditions
BHP Billiton Group Management Award Plan Conditional Awards FY15 Terms and Conditions This document summarises the terms and conditions applicable to Conditional Awards of Restricted Shares under the FY15
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 12 May 2011 (*)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 12 May 2011 (*) (Air transport Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 Article 5(3) Compensation of passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight Exemption from the obligation
More informationBEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE IN THE MATTER OF ) ) J. E. R., S. C. ) OAH No. 09-0243-PFD R. and K. E. R. ) Agency Nos. 2008-044-1989,
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
Order 2016-4-1 Served: April 4, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 4 th day of April,
More informationImplementation at National level. Laura Fiumara Gent, 4 July 2018
1 Implementation at National level Laura Fiumara Gent, 4 July 2018 Legal basis 2 Air passenger rights: Reg. (EC) No 261/2004 Rail passenger rights: Reg. (EC) No 1371/2007 Waterborne passenger rights: Reg.
More informationGeneral Terms and Conditions (GTC) of Germania Fluggesellschaft mbh ("Germania")
General Terms and Conditions (GTC) of Germania Fluggesellschaft mbh ("Germania") updated: 30 th November 2017 1. Booking The booking can be made via the internet www.flygermania.com, telephone (service
More informationAn Unclaimed Intangible Property Program for Ontario
for Ontario Introduction A wide variety of intangible property currently lies unclaimed in various institutions in Ontario. The 2012 Ontario Budget announced the government s intention to establish a program
More informationPresented by Long Beach City Attorney s Office Michael Mais, Assistant City Attorney February 17, 2015
Presented by Long Beach City Attorney s Office Michael Mais, Assistant City Attorney February 17, 2015 1 In existence since 1923 Covers 1166 acres Surrounded by a mix of commercial, industrial and residential
More informationEVE KNIGHTS : November : May JUDGMENT
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES SUIT NO.: 25 OF 2003 BETWEEN: LEROY ALLEN v EVE KNIGHTS Claimant Defendant Appearances: Mr. Sylvester Raymond-Cadette
More informationINTERNATIONAL FIRE TRAINING CENTRE
INTERNATIONAL FIRE TRAINING CENTRE RFFS SUPERVISOR INITIAL LICENSING OF AERODROMES CHAPTER 8 THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO BE MET IN THE PROVISION OF RESCUE AND FIRE FIGHTING SERVICES AT UK LICENSED AERODROMES
More informationRECOMMENDATION ECAC/16-1 AIR CARRIERS LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO PASSENGERS
RECOMMENDATION ECAC/16-1 AIR CARRIERS LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO PASSENGERS RECOMMENDATION ECAC/16-1 AIR CARRIERS' LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO PASSENGERS THE CONFERENCE RECOGNIZING RECALLING CONSIDERING NOTING
More informationRevisions to Denied Boarding Compensation, Domestic Baggage Liability Limits, Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation (DOT).
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/27/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-12789, and on FDsys.gov 4910-9X DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/12/ :31 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/12/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/12/2016 01:31 PM INDEX NO. 655422/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/12/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Project Orbis International,
More informationAPRA RECCOMENDATIONS ON
APRA RECCOMENDATIONS ON Interpretative Guidelines on Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 46/1. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)
17.2.2004 Official Journal of the European Union L 46/1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) REGULATION (EC) No 261/2004 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 February 2004 establishing
More informationCANADA LABOUR CODE PART II OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
Decision no.: 95-012 CANADA LABOUR CODE PART II OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH Review under section 146 of the Canada Labour Code of directions given by the safety officer Applicant: Interested party:
More informationPLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THE Qantas Cash App
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THE Qantas Cash App This is a legal agreement ( Agreement ) between you (the person accessing, viewing, using, or installing the app, and later referred to as you ) and
More informationWorking Draft: Time-share Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition
March 1, 2017 Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition Working Draft: Time-share Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Issue #16-6: Recognition of Revenue Management Fees Expected Overall Level
More informationAsia Pacific Regional Aviation Safety Team
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Regional Aviation Safety Group (Asia & Pacific Regions) Asia Pacific Regional Aviation Safety Team GUIDANCE FOR AIR OPERATORS IN ESTABLISHING A FLIGHT SAFETY
More informationRequirement for bonding and other forms of security
Consumer Protection Group Air Travel Organisers Licensing Requirement for bonding and other forms of security ATOL Policy and Regulations 2016/02 Contents Contents... 1 1. Introduction... 2 Assessment
More informationAirways New Zealand Queenstown lights proposal Public submissions document
Airways New Zealand Queenstown lights proposal 2014 Public submissions document Version 1.0 12 December, 2014 Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Purpose... 3 3 Air New Zealand Limited... 4 3.1 Proposed changes
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.
Order 2017-7-10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation On the 21 st day of July, 2017 Delta Air Lines,
More informationBHP Billiton Group Group Short Term Incentive Plan Conditional Awards FY14 Terms and Conditions
BHP Billiton Group Group Short Term Incentive Plan Conditional Awards FY14 Terms and Conditions This document summarises the terms and conditions applicable to Conditional Awards of Deferred Shares under
More information