Presentation of 1 st Interim Report 2006 Stockholm and London, May 4-5

Transcription

1 Result affected by pilot conflict and underlying yield pressure EBT bef nonrecurring items MSEK in line with 25 Positive Easter Effect MSEK 1 Cost for conflicts of MSEK 25 Still underlying price pressure Lower volumes and price pressure in SGS and STS Strong growth and record load factors Jet fuel price effect MSEK 55 higher than last year Presentation of 1 st Interim Report 26 Stockholm and London, May 4-5 EBT result in improved by MSEK 25 New cost measures on track and extended from SEK 2, to SEK 2,5 billion 2 EBT result in line with last year Record load factors after introduction of New Business Models -March MSEK 26 Change Revenues EBITDAR New Businesses Models very well received in market number of passengers up by 12,2% to a record 8,5 million Strong growth on European routes traffic up 18,4% Cabin factor change vs last year Lease & depreciation EBIT Financial net EBT EBT bef non-recurring items , p u +11, p u +8, p u +5, p u +2, p u -1, p u -4, p u -7, p u -1, p u Jan New Business Model Norwegian Domestic Mar Apr May jul Aug Sep Oct New Business Model Swedish domestic Nov Jan Mar Apr May New Business Model Europe jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Jan Mar Norway domestic Sweden domestic Europe 3 4

2 Group number of passengers grew by 12,2% in 1 st Quarter and has passed 37 million More than 4 million low fare tickets 19,% 17,% 15,% 13,% 11,% 5 9,% 7,% 5,% 3,% 1,% -1,% -3,% -5,% 4-dec 5-jan 5-feb 5-mar 5-apr 5-may 5-jun Passenger growth vs last month 5-jul 5-aug 5-sep oct-5 5-nov 5-dec 6-jan 6-feb 6-mar Number of passengers (12 month-rolling) The largest low fare provider in the Nordic skies New Businesses Models has increased the number of low fare tickets Simplified rules one way prices Prices entirely demand driven Positive impact from one way experienced on Norwegian, Swedish domestic and Europe/ Intrascandinavian routes Reduced yield offset by increased load factor 6 More than 1 million low fare tickets offered in the Norwegian market 2 million low fare tickets offered in the Danish market 1 million low fare tickets offered in the Swedish market but we will also do much more for the frequent travellers Added services Attractive products/ services which can be Next added phase to base product to adjust product to customers individual preferences 7 More commercial initiatives to be introduced during 26: Next step in price model Improved benefits to loyal customers Product differentiation Improved internet sales engine Easier to find low fares Base product Attractive basic offer Few restrictions Price follows demand Gunilla Berg CFO

3 Strongest Improvements improvement in airlines in Scandinavian hotels Airlines Businesses SAS Improvements Group underlying airlines result and improved hotels MSEK 2-3 MSEK 26 Change Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Airline Support Businesses Hotels Group eliminations, other EBT bef nonrecurring items ,,5, -,5 Cabin factor +5 p.u.,1 -,25,6,1 -,5,6 -,6 Inflation -,3 ECA -,1 Currency -,1 Support -,1-1, -1,5-1,3 25 Easter Strike Volume Yield Fuel (price) Cost program -1,3 Other Positive free cash flow after investments and improved net debt Fuel cost at record level Full year fuel cost up SEK 2,5-3 billion -March SEK, billion 26 Cash flow from operations -1, Change in working capital 1. Net financing from operations -. Investments, adv. payments -.4 Acquisitions/sale of subsidiaries (net). Sale of fixed assets etc..6 Financing deficit/surplus.2 Change in external financing -. Cash flow from the period strategy to offset jet fuel price Policy to hedge 4-6% of expected consumption (12 months) Yield management Cost initiatives Price increase due to very high prices on continuous basis jan-99 maj-99 sep-99 jan- maj- sep- jan-1 maj-1 sep-1 jan-2 maj-2 sep-2 jan-3 maj-3 sep-3 jan-4 maj-4 sep-4 jan-5 maj-5 sep-5 jan-6 Financial net debt 14.1 Available funds

4 Result improved for most Scandinavian Airlines Unit cost weighted for increased volume down in Q1 in MSEK Scandinavian Airlines Denmark Scandinavian Airlines Sweden Scandinavian Airlines International Revenues ,6% ,4% ,4% ,1% EBT bef nonrec Unit cost vs Unit cost Unit cost method last year adjusted for fuel ASK 7,1% 3,% 5% ASK & RPK 3,3%,% EBT bef nonreccuring items SAS Denmark SAS Braathens SAS Sweden SAS International % ASK & passengers,9% -1,9% Unit cost based on only ASK is penalized by sharply improved cabin factor and utilization of capacity Unit cost weighted with increased traffic/passengers shows continued improved cost per passengers/traffic STS and SGS affected by lower volumes SEK 2,5 billion of new measures under implementation in in MSEK Revenues ,9% ,9% ,3% 126-1,6% EBT, bef nonrec Productivity (partly dependent on changes in collective agreements) Block hours F/D 7 h C/A 75 h Ground and technical services Productivity (part time) Leaner mgmt Line and Heavy Maintenance Simplified product Reduced component costs Administration/sales & other flight related costs IT Call centers Overhead Sales organization Airline Support Businesses Structural cost measures of SEK 2,5 billion under implementation Measures increased by SEK,5 billion SEK,4 billion dependent on new collective agreements 44% implemented

5 Capacity Improvements guidance in reduced airlines due and to hotels increased focus on dynamic traffic planning 26 Fuel costs (SEK, billion) ~11 ASK up 2% (previous guiding 3-4%) Jørgen Lindegaard CEO 26 Yield down ASK -2% to -3% Load factor up Capacity 26 vs 25 Scandinavian Airlines Danmark -7% SAS Braathens +6% Scandinavian Airlines Sverige -9% Scandinavian Airlines International -6% Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Capacity 26 vs 25 Spanair 1% Blue1 6% Widerøe 5-7% airbaltic 25% 17 Spanair weaker due to Easter Effect and challenges in Widerøe Blue1 and airbaltic expanding in their home markets Total revenues EBITDAR EBT, bef nonrecurring items Total revenues EBITDAR 68 8 EBT, bef nonrecurring items Total revenues EBITDAR EBT, bef nonrecurring items Total revenues EBITDAR 12-7 EBT, bef nonrecurring items Robust traffic development in first Quarter Number of passengers up 35,6% Cabin factor up 5,9 p.u. to 6,1% Jet fuel up 7% vs last year corresponding to MSEK 212 also due to expansion 1 st Quarter negatively affected by Easter effect of MSEK 5 Traffic up 4,7% and cabin factor improved by 2,5 p.u. to 56,% Yield was down,3% in Q1 due to more low fare tickets in the market Unit cost up 6,9% due to jet fuel and costs for technical maintenance Strong traffic figures in Q1 Passengers up 19,5% Traffic up 23,8% Cabin factor up 5,5 p.u. to 59,5% Start up cost with European expansion 9 new destinations introduced from Helsinki Booking figures on tourist destinations are promising EBT improved MSEK 15 due to improved utilization Strong traffic development Number of passengers up 55,9% Cabin factor improved 8,8 p.u. to 59,% Unit cost up 7,7% negatively affected by fuel and personnel airbaltic competing successfully with Ryanair and Easyjet Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 19 Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 2

6 Strong hotel market gives improved result of MSEK Total revenues EBITDA EBT Strong hotel market Result positively affected by Easter in April Number of rooms sold increased RevPAR up 2,6% for comparable units Occupancy rate improved 4,4 p.u. 7 new hotels opened in Q1. Total number of hotels now 224 Rezidor SAS 21 Radisson SAS, Frankfurt Spain Market: 11% Spanair: 35,6% Spanair expanding in Barcelona and Madrid 22 Market growth and growth for airlines Norway Market: 11% SK: 6,3% Challenging situation on Norway domestic, strong internationally Scandinavian Airlines Denmark Market: 6,2% SK: 8,7% Scandinavian Airlines Sweden Market: 5,4% SK: 2,4% Market share up on international flights Introduction of New Business Model successful on Europe Finland Market: 7,7% Blue1: 19,5% Blue1 taking market shares domestic and expanding on nine new European destinations Latvia & Lithuania Market: app 5% airbaltic: 55,9% Estonia Market: app 15% Estonian Air: 15% Capacity boom in the Baltics. airbaltic gains market shares in competition with Ryanair and Easyjet Three pillars of the competitiveness Tough start of 26, but passenger growth trend intact Cost Turnaround 25 New cost adaptation measures Cost at market levels Incorporation of Businesses units Transparency Local adaptation Flexibility Time to market New Business Models One way pricing Demand driven Internet in process Value for money 23 in process 24 Tough start of 26 Pilot action result effect appr MSEK 25 Cabin conflict in Norway New Business Models Solid traffic development Record load factors and number of passengers More commercial initiatives in pipeline Jet fuel costs more challenging and to be handled through Yield management Cost reductions Hedging Cost measures increased to SEK 2,5 billion Outlook Stable market growth 3-5% New Business Model with improved load Load up 7 p.u. in Scandinavian Airlines after Easter

7 Source: TOTQ 25, CFI Group Additional slides for further information 26 Southwest Airlines Co. Blue1 Widerøe Continental Airlines, Inc. Scandinavian Airlines Delta Air Lines, Inc. American Airlines (AMR Corporation) Northwest Airlines Corporation United Airlines (UAL Corporation) US Airways Group, Inc. Customer satisfaction satisfactory but will be targeted for Scandinavian Airlines Four Business Areas as from 26 From business units to limited companies Closer to local markets Improved accountability 28

8 Group Revenue Business models for airlines -three common denominators Revenues growing in major business areas Commercial concept Traffic system Costs Change Price structures based on demand-driven oneway prices for simple online distribution Differentiated base product Add-on products that stimulate buy-up and ancillary revenues Value-for-money Traffic systems dimensioned for local passengers and for profitable transfer traffic Dynamic flexible traffic planning 1, ,5 1,5 1, ,9 3,7 6 5 Hotels Airline Support Businesses Group revenue distribution Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Scandinavian Airlines Businesses 8,5 8 7,5 8,4 8,1 6 5 Cost level for basic product in line with most efficient players Additional costs for transfer, distribution, in-flight, on-ground, network etc. to be covered by a price premium 3,5 3 2,5 3,5 2, Revenue seasonality pattern EBITDAR and CFROI improved MSEK Revenue ,1% EBITDAR ,4% EBITDAR-margin 1,5% 1,7% -,2 p.p. CFROI 13% 1% +3 p.p. jan feb mar apr maj jun jul aug sep okt nov dec 31 32

9 1 st Quarter seasonally weak Improvements in airlines and hotels EBITDAR improved by MSEK MSEK, EBT before gains and nonrecurring items Q1 Q2 Q3 Q Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q EBITDAR (12 months rolling) EBIT (12 months rolling) EBITDAR in Q1 was MSEK 219 (222) EBITDAR distribution Scandin Airl. MSEK 16 (-33) Spanair MSEK 143 (119) Widerøe MSEK 68 (8) Blue1 MSEK 11 (34) airbaltic MSEK 12 (-7) Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 34 EBIT-margin and revenues Very strong growth in many Group airlines Revenues MSEK EBIT-margin 1,% 5,%,% Passenger growth in Q1 26 vs Q1 25 % ,5 million passengers in Q1 - new record Q 23 2Q 23 3Q 23 4Q 23 Revenues 1Q 24 2Q 24 3Q 24 EBIT-margin 4Q 24 Q1 25 Q2 25 Q3 25 Q4 25 Q1 26-5,% -1,% -15,% airbaltic Spanair Blue1 SK Denmark SAS Braathens SK Sweden SK International

10 Record high jet fuel prices Passengers growing most airlines Average market prices: USD/MT USD/MT USD/MT USD/MT USD/MT USD/MT Q USD/MT Q USD/MT Q USD/MT Q USD/MT Q USD/MT Hedge levels (including premiums): 41% hedged for 26 by May 26: 675 USD/MT Business areas 37 Scandinavian Airlines statement of income -March MSEK Change Revenues Operating expenses EBITDAR Lease EBITDA Depreciation Income from sales/affiliated EBIT EBT EBT bef. nonrecurring items

11 EBITDAR is improving Key airline profitability drivers EBITDAR, Scandinavian Airlines MSEK vs 25 -March Traffic (RPK) up 1,3% Cabin Factor up 5,8 p.u. Yields (currency adjusted) up 1,2% Total unit costs up 7,1% Fuel adjusted unit cost up 3,% -5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q Scandinavian Airlines Danmark strong cabin factor improvement more passengers SAS Braathens hit hard by conflict and low image actions taken to improve situation Signs of reduced overcapacity in the home market Negative effect from pilot conflict in Q1 MSEK 11 Positive situation between cabin factor and yield decline Solid traffic growth Traffic up 7,7% Capacity down 1,7% Cabin factor up 11,2 p.u. to 65,7% 26 Total revenues EBITDAR EBT EBT weaker by MSEK 41 vs last year Negative effect from conflict in Q1 appr MSEK 14 Satisfactory traffic growth Traffic up 8,3% vs Q1 25 Cabin factor up 2,9 p.u. to 63,2% Over 4% internet bookings on domestic routes Capacity increasing with one aircraft as from March new routes opened from Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger and Kristiansand Total revenues EBITDAR EBT, bef nonrecurring items Group Scandinavian Airlines Operations Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Airline Support Airline Related Business Hotels 43 44

12 Scandinavian Airlines Sweden Q1 improved by MSEK 135 Scandinavian Airlines International Still fierce competition on Swedish domestic routes Cost reductions behind improved earnings Traffic up by 3,2% vs 25 Total cabin factor up 7,7 p.u. to 64,9% Yield down by 2,6% Pilots moved to Scandinavian Airlines Sweden in March New cooperation with City Airlines as from April 26 has improved service to/from Gothenburg Development in 1 st Quarter as expected Earnings improved although competition has increased Yield up 9,5% during the Quarter has compensated increased fuel costs Cabin factor improved 3,7 p.u. to 79,7% Several product improvements Internet onboard all aircraft Flat bed introduced 1 st Quarter Total revenues EBITDAR EBT Jan Total revenues EBITDAR EBT, bef nonrecc Yield has stabilized North Atlantic cabin factor stronger than North AEAAtlantic cabin factor above AEA 12-months rolling 1,3 1,25 1,2 1,15 1,1 1,5 dec-3 mar-4 jun-4 sep-4 dec-4 mar-5 jun-5 sep-5 dec-5 mar-6 47 %, RPK vs. Last year %, Cabin factor April July October April Week 43 5 July October SAS AEA April July 4 47 October Daily departures to/from New York, Washington DC, Chicago, Seattle from Copenhagen Daily departures to/from New York and Chicago from Stockholm Compared with 25 capacity has been reduced to New York and Washington DC resulting in improved cabin factors and lower volumes Positive mix Traffic in 26: European airlines (AEA) traffic down 1,5% SAS traffic down 12,5%

13 Strong traffic increase on Asian routes Cabin factor over AEA on European routes %, RPK vs. Last year %, Cabin factor SAS AEA 49 Week April July October April July October April July October April July October Positive mix between Economy and Business Class Good development in Economy Extra Cabin factor higher than AEA Traffic in 26: AEA traffic up 13,2% SAS traffic up 1,1% albeit capacity being reduced %, RPK vs. Last year %, Cabin factor March May July September November March May July September November March May July September November March SAS AEA Scandinavian Airlines has reduced its capacity by 6,2% in Q1 Scandinavian Airlines introduced one way fares in September which significantly has improved cabin factor further Cabin factor above AEA average since September Traffic 26: AEA traffic up 3,9% SAS traffic up 9,5% ECA agreement expires in 27 negative effect North in 26 Atlantic estimated cabin appr factor MSEK above 4 AEA Tri-party Joint Venture agreement with BMI, Lufthansa and SAS signed November 9, 1999 In effect from 1, 2 Main scope: To integrate the parties scheduled pass. transport to/ from London/ Manchester Negative result effect 22: MSEK 418 (335) Negative result effect 23: MSEK 244 Negative result effect 24: MSEK 134 Negative result effect 25: MSEK 415 Result effect 1st Quarter 26: MSEK 13 (-64) 51 Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines

14 Weaker 1 st Quarter Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines weaker than 25 -March MSEK Change Revenues Operating expenses EBITDAR Lease EBITDA in MSEK Revenues % ,8% ,9% ,5% EBITDAR EBT bef nonrec Depreciation Income from sales/affiliated EBIT EBT EBT before gains and nonreccuring items Negative Easter Effect in Spanair Start up costs Blue1 Challenges in Widerøe Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 53 Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 54 Spanair weaker due to different timing of Easter holiday and jet fuel Widerøe weaker due to higher technical costs and less competitive agreement with personnel Robust traffic development in first Quarter Number of passengers up 35,65 Cabin factor up 5,9 p.u. to 6,1% Jet fuel up 7% vs last year corresponding to MSEK st Quarter negatively affected by Easter in April in 26 vs March in Total revenues EBITDAR EBT, bef nonrecurring items Traffic up 4,7% and cabin factor improved by 2,5 p.u. to 56,% Yield was down,3% in Q1 due to more low fare tickets in the market Unit cost up 6,9% due to jet fuel and costs for technical maintenance Total revenues EBITDAR 68 8 EBT, bef nonrecurring items Passengers 12 months rolling 7 5 EBT, MSEK dec 5- jan 5- feb 5- mar 5- apr may- 5-jun 5-jul 5-5 aug Spanair 5- sep oct nov 5- dec 6- jan 6- feb 6- mar -2-4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Jan- Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines 55 56

15 1 st Quarter negatively affected by phase in costs of new aircraft booking figures promising Continued strong growth but result negatively affected by fuel Start up cost with European expansion 9 new destinations introduced from Helsinki Booking figures on tourist destinations are promising Strong traffic figures in Q1 Passengers up 19,5% Traffic up 23,8% Cabin factor up 5,5 p.u. to 59,5% Total revenues EBITDAR EBT, bef nonrecurring items EBT improved MSEK 15 due to improved utilization Strong traffic development Number of passengers up 55,9% Cabin factor improved 8,8 p.u. to 59,% Unit cost up 7,7% negatively affected by fuel and personnel airbaltic competing successfully with Ryanair and Easyjet Total revenues EBITDAR 12-7 EBT, bef nonrecurring items Number of passengers airbaltic Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines month rolling Month Estonian Air shows solid growth The holds 49% in Estonian Air Estonian Air number of passengers up 9% in Q1 Competitive cost position Increasing charter operation Number of passengers Estonian Air Apr Aug Okt Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Apr Aug Okt Apr Aug 12 month rolling Monthly figures Oct Airline Support Businesses 59

16 Airline Support Businesses -March MSEK Change Revenues Operating expensives EBITDA Depreciation EBIT EBT EBT bef nonrecurring items Airline Support Businesses Significant improved occupancy rate RevPAR improves 8% 7% 6% 5% 75% 7% 65% RevPAR (EUR), 12 months rolling value % Rezidor SAS 2-jan Mar Sept 3-jan Mar Sept Occupancy rate 4-jan Mar Sep 12 month rolling Jan Mar Sep Jan 6% 55 5 Rezidor SAS jun-2 jun-3 jun-4 jun

17 Balance sheet Financial update MSEK 31 Mar Liquid funds Aircraft, spare parts Other assets Total assets Operating liabilities Interest-bearing liabilities Deferred tax Equity Total liabilities and equity Financial net debt Group Mainline Airline Operations Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Airline Support Business Airline Related Business Hotels Limited CAPEX has SEK 14 billion in available funds improvement by SEK 3,5 billion Firm Aircraft Orders Total Airbus A Boeing Number of aircraft CAPEX (MUSD) March 6 March 5 Change Liquid Funds MSEK Available Credit Facilites: Revolving Credit Facility (MEUR 4) Bi-lateral Facilities Others Total Available Facilities Total Available Funds Available facilities MSEK 5 66 Utilized facilities MSEK 1 44 Total facilities MSEK

18 CAPEX holiday continues Key financial ratios and future targets MSEK F 27F Amortization profile of interest bearing liabilities Key figures Mar 6 5 Target Equity/assets ratio (solidity) 19% 21% >3% Financial net debt/ equity 126% 118% <5% Fin. net debt+7*oplease/ equity 326% 29% <1% 7 Targets will be reached by: New Business Models and rationalization Capital Release: Aircraft phase-outs Other Assets (Properties, non-core subsidiaries etc) Cash flow from operations Financial Net -March 26 vs last year (MSEK) Q1-26 Q1-25 Difference Interest net and others Revolving credit facility Exchange rate differences Financial net

19 Development and break down of Financial Net Debt since year end Development and break down of Financial Net Debt since last year (MSEK) Difference Cash Other interest bearing assets Interest bearing liabilities Financial Net debt (MSEK) Difference Cash Other interest bearing assets Interest bearing liabilities Financial Net debt Development of Financial Net Debt Equity/Asset ratio 5% 45% 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% %

20 Financial net debt/equity ratio Gearing ratios weaker in Q1 2,5 2,3 2, 1,8 1,5 1,3 1,,8,5,3, % 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% % dec- 98 dec- 99 dec- Net Debt / Equity dec- 1 Equity / Total Assets dec- mar- jun sep- 3 dec- mar- jun sep- 4 dec- mar- jun Fin Net Debt / Equity sep- dec mar- 5 6 Fin. Net Debt + 7*Op lease / Equity Credit postion Sum up Solid liquidity of MSEK Substantial Committed credit facilities of MSEK 5 66 Credit facilities of MSEK 933 amortized in Q1 Limited CAPEX in Streamlining of Group New cost adaptive measures under implementation and increased to SEK 2,5 billion Positive cash flow from operations Loss carry forward will improve tax position APPENDICES Traffic Data Yield Unit cost Fleet Financial key figures 79 8

21 Yield development 26 vs 25 Improved load factors and stable yild Total Scheduled Change Yield (öre/rpk) 114,7 18,2 6,% Currency adj. yield 114,7 113,4 1,2% % 7% 6% 5% 4% 3-nov 4-jan 4-mar 4-maj 4-jul Load factor 4-sep 4-nov 5-jan 5-mar 5-may 5-jul Yield (12 months rolling) 5-sep 5-nov 6-jan 6-mar 1,3 1,3 1,2 1,2 1,1 1,1 1, Yield development Scandinavian Airlines Businesses Passenger yield -March 26 % Q1 vs 23 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 vs 24 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Yields down 9,1% in 24 Yields down,3 in 25 Yield up 1,2% in Q1 26 Nominal Currency Adjusted Route Sector yield effect yield Scandinavian Airlines Busin Intercontinental Europe Intrascandinavian Denmark Norway Sweden vs vs vs

22 Yield development 26 vs 25 Unit cost development Yield, local currency 2,4% -,3% -8,5% -6,8% Subsidiary & Affiliated Airlines Unit up in Q1 due to increased fuel costs, conflict in and reduced capacity Bock hours overview Total unit cost, 8% 3% -2% -7% -12% Unit cost down 1,9% in 24 Unit cost down 1,7% in 25 Unit cost up 7,1% in Q1 Adjusted for fuel, unit cost was up by 3,% due to conflict and reduced capacity 12 months rolling Apr 5 -Mar 6 Air craft/day Pilots/year Cabin/year 8, Spanair Widerøe Blue1 8,2 6,9 8, airbaltic 8, % 1st Q 23 3rd Q 23 1st Q 24 3rd Q 24 1st Q 25 3rd Q 25 1st Q

23 Key productivity ratios Self Service check in and internet check close to 5% and Internet Check in over 5% Internet check low, but increasing Aircraft utilization (12 month roling) 8,5 8 7,5 7 Cabin, pilot utilization (12 month roling) % 5% 45% 4% 6,5 6 5,5 5 Apr Aug Oct Apr Aug Oct Apr Aug Oct Cabin crew Apr Pilots Aug Oct 35% 3% 25% 2% Automat Automat+internet 89 9 Long term passenger cabin factor trend positive USD has been stronger in 26 vs 25 affecting costs negatively Moving 12 months values 74% 72% 7% 68% 66% 64% 62% % DEC94 DEC95 DEC96 DEC97 DEC98 DEC99 DEC DEC1 DEC2 DEC3 DEC4 DEC5 DEC

24 Currency effect -March 26 vs 25 Currency effect -March 26 vs MSEK Total revenues +62 Total costs -86 Forward cover costs & working cap. +18 Income before depr. -6 Financial items +13 Income before tax -47 Total revenues & costs: (Total 24 MSEK) Major approx. effects: USD -368 DKK -17 NOK +78 EUR +17 Asian curr. +32 All others +18 Forward cover costs: (Total +88 MSEK) Working capital: (Total +92MSEK) Financial items: (Total +13 MSEK) Grand total -47 MSEK Currency distribution in the 25 fleet March 26 NOK 28% Revenues SEK 21% USD 7% Others 4% DKK 11% SEK 18% Expenses USD 26% Others 2% DKK 14% Owned Leased Total Leased out On order Airbus A33/A Airbus A321/A32/A Boeing 737-serien Boeing 717 (MD-95) 4 4 Douglas MD-8-serien Douglas MD-9-serien Avro RJ-85/1 9 9 Fokker F dehavilland Q-serien SAAB Totalt GBP 5% EUR 24% NOK 19% GBP 3% EUR 18% Scandinavian Airlines Spanair Wideroe Blue Total

25 Development of Market Capitalization SAS share jan-3 maj-3 sep-3 jan-4 maj-4 sep-4 jan-5 maj-5 sep-5 jan SAS share up significantly more than index since ember 24 Number of SAS trades share continues to increase 99 SAS Market Capitalization vs. European Peers measured in SEK (ember 31, 24 - March 31, 26) 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 1, 9, 8, 7, 3- jan feb mar apr maj jun- jul- aug- sep Index peers okt- nov- dec Index SAS * Peers: Alitalia, Air France, British Airways, Easyjet, Finnair, Lufthansa & Ryanair 3- jan feb mar ,7 138, Number of shares traded in SAS per month ruary March April May e July August September October November ember