APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS"

Transcription

1 APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS Purpose For this Airport Master Plan study, the FAA has requested a runway length analysis to be completed to current FAA AC 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design, and draft FAA standards identified in FAA AC 150/5325-4C, Runway Length Recommendations for Airport Design (DRAFT). Due to the technical nature of this analysis, a separate appendix has been prepared to arrive at recommended runway lengths for the existing and future design aircraft identified in this planning study. Existing FAA Standard A runway length analysis for other aircraft was performed using the FAA s current methodology found in FAA AC 150/5325-4B. The design approach identifies a recommended runway length based on a family grouping of design aircraft. For ROX the current design aircraft includes small general aviation aircraft with approach speeds of 50 knots or greater and maximum certified takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds or less (Beechcraft King Air B200). The future runway length may be driven from a design aircraft greater than 12,500 pounds but less than 60,000 pounds (Cessna Citation XLS+). Small Airplanes Up to 12,500 Pounds The FAA design approach identified in Chapter 2 of FAA AC 150/5325-4B for most small aircraft less than 12,500 pounds requires several steps to be performed to determine runway length: 1. Identify Number of Passenger Seats: Classify design aircraft as one of two categories; Less than 10 Passenger Seats and 10 Passenger Seats or Greater 2. Select Percentage of Fleet: Airplanes classified as Less than 10 Passenger Seats are grouped into two percentage categories based on the airport s location and the amount of existing or planned aviation activities. The categories include 95 Percent of Fleet and 100 Percent of Fleet. 3. Consider Future Airport Expansion: Consider runway length requirements during Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) or expansions to accommodate airplanes more than 12,500 pounds. 4. Determine Airport Data: Evaluate the airport elevation, mean daily temperature in hottest month and runway condition to make adjustments to runway length. 5. Calculate Runway Length Based on Curves: Utilize FAA runway length curves published in AC 150/5325-4B. Large Airplanes Up to 60,000 Pounds The FAA design approach identified in Chapter 3 of FAA AC 150/5325-4B for aircraft greater than 12,500 pounds and less than 60,000 pounds requires the following steps to be performed to determine runway length: Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 1

2 1. Select Percentage of Fleet: Group the design airplane into one of two percentage categories based on performance. The categories include 75 Percent of Fleet and 100 Percent of Fleet. 2. Identify Useful Load Factor: Determine the useful load factor for the design aircraft based on the difference in maximum gross weight and the basic operating weight. Useful load consists of passengers, cargo and usable fuel. The categories include 60 percent useful load and 90 percent useful load. 3. Determine Airport Data: Evaluate the airport elevation, mean daily temperature in hottest month and runway condition to make adjustments to runway length. 4. Calculate Runway Length: Utilize FAA runway length curves published in AC 150/5325-4B. 5. Apply Adjustments: The effective runway gradient affects the aircraft s takeoff length. Wet and slippery runways for turbojet airplanes allow for runway length curves to be increased by 15 percent up to 5,500 feet for 60 percent useful load and 7,000 feet for 90 percent useful load. The recommended FAA runway length calculations at ROX for aircraft up to 60,000 pounds are summarized in the following table: Exhibit 1 FAA AC 150/5345-4B Runway Length Requirements (< 60,000 lbs.) Airport and Runway Data Airport Elevation 1,060 feet Mean Daily Maximum Temperature of Hottest Month 78.2 F Maximum Difference in Runway Centerline Elevation 14 feet (+140 feet) Runway Condition Wet and Slippery Runways Aircraft Classification Recommended Runway Length Small airplanes 12,500 pounds or less 10 or more passenger seats 4,300 feet Less than 10 passenger seats at 100 percent of fleet 3,900 feet Less than 10 passenger seats at 95 percent of fleet 3,300 feet Large airplanes greater than 12,500 lbs. up to 60,000 lbs. 100 percent of fleet at 90 percent useful load 8,100 feet 100 percent of fleet at 60 percent useful load (Wet) 5,600 feet 100 percent of fleet at 60 percent useful load (Dry) 5,600 feet 75 percent of fleet at 90 percent useful load 7,000 feet 75 percent of fleet at 60 percent useful load (Wet) 5,500 feet 75 percent of fleet at 60 percent useful load (Dry) 4,900 feet Source: FAA AC 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design Note: Runway length requirements estimated based on charts for airport planning purposes only. The FAA states airport planners can determine the recommended runway length from airplane flight manuals for the airplanes to be accommodated by the airport in lieu of the runway length curves depicted in figures 2-1 or 2-2. This method is recommended to evaluate the runway length needs of turboprop airplanes that require pilots to use the airplane s accelerate-stop distance in determining the length of runway available for takeoff. Further analysis of the recommended runway length for the existing design aircraft (Beechcraft King Air B200) using specific aircraft performance data is contained later in this Appendix. For small general aviation aircraft with less than 10 passenger seats, the runway length requirements of 95 percent of fleet would apply at ROX due to its rural location. The recommended runway length Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 2

3 for small general aviation aircraft is 3,300 feet. This runway length would accommodate the vast majority of small general aviation aircraft with less than 10 passenger seats. The future critical design aircraft includes a large aircraft greater than 12,500 lbs. up to 60,000 lbs. Fleet mix includes the Cessna Citation XLS+ aircraft. The Cessna Citation XLS+ is classified as 75 percent of fleet. Using the 75 percent of fleet calculation and 60 percent useful load, the recommended future runway length is 4,900 feet under dry runway conditions and 5,500 feet for wet and slippery runways. The ultimate design aircraft is not expected to increase from the 75 percent of fleet classification to the 100 percent of fleet classification. Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 3

4 FAA Figure 2-1: Small Airplanes with Fewer than 10 Passenger Seats (Excludes Pilot and Co-pilot) Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Airport Elevation (feet) 95 Percent of Fleet 100 Percent of Fleet Runway 95 Percent of Fleet: 3,300 feet Runway 100 Percent of Fleet: 3,900 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 4

5 FAA Figure 2-2: Small Airplanes Having 10 or More Passenger Seats (Excludes Pilot and Co-pilot) Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Recommended Runway Length: 4,230 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 5

6 FAA Figure 3-1: 75 Percent of Fleet at 60 or 90 Percent Useful Load Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Maximum Difference in Runway Centerline Elevation: 14 feet = 140 feet in Distance (added) Runway 60 useful load (Dry Runway): 4, = 4,900 feet Runway 60 useful load (Wet Runway): 5,500 feet Runway 90 useful load (Dry Runway): 6, = 6,340 feet Runway 90 useful load (Wet Runway): 7,000 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 6

7 FAA Table 3-1: Airplanes that Make Up 75 Percent of Fleet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 7

8 FAA Table 3-1: Remaining 25 Percent of Airplanes that Make Up 100 Percent of Fleet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 8

9 FAA Figure 3-2: 100 Percent of Fleet at 60 or 90 Percent Useful Load Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Maximum Difference in Runway Centerline Elevation: 14 feet = 140 feet in Distance (added) Runway 60 percent useful load (Dry Runway): 5, = 5,540 feet Runway 60 percent useful load (Wet Runway): 5,540 feet Runway 90 percent useful load (Dry Runway): 7, = 8,040 feet Runway 90 percent useful load (Wet Runway): 8,040 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 9

10 Existing Design Aircraft Performance Beechcraft King Air B200 As stated earlier, FAA also allows airport designers to determine the recommended runway length from airplane flight manuals for the airplanes to be accommodated by the airport in lieu of the runway length curves for small aircraft. These were reviewed for the existing critical aircraft, the Beechcraft King Air B200 airplane operated by Polaris Industries. Polaris Industries operates under FAR Part 91, General Operating and Flight Rules and other company-specific safety standards. Beechcraft King Air B200 Takeoff Distance To meet company safety standards, Polaris Industries follows FAR Part 25, Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes requirements to calculate runway length to satisfy the longest of these three distances: Accelerate-go distance: The distance required to accelerate to V1 with all engines at takeoff power, experience an engine failure at V1 and continue the takeoff on the remaining engine(s). The runway required includes the distance required to climb to 35 feet by which time V2 speed must be attained. Accelerate-stop distance: The distance required to accelerate to V1 with all engines at takeoff power, experience an engine failure at V1, and abort the takeoff and bring the aircraft to a stop using braking action only (use of thrust reversing is not considered). Takeoff distance: The distance required to complete an all-engines operative takeoff to the 35-foot height. It must be at least 15 percent less than the distance required for a one-engine inoperative engine takeoff. This distance is not normally a limiting factor as it is usually less than the one-engine inoperative takeoff distance. FAR Part 25 safety standards for corporate turboprop and turbojet operators have become more common to support safe flight operations. These standards are incorporated into the Safety Management Systems (SMS) procedures for Polaris Industries operation of the B200 aircraft. The accelerate-stop distance is the longest of the three takeoff distances for the B200. Runway lengths for small aircraft such as the B200 are published only for a dry runway. The B200 does not have any performance charts published for a wet runway based for its FAR Part 23 (Commuter) certification type. Polaris Industries operational SMS standards require a minimum runway length of 4,000 feet for the B200. Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 10

11 Exhibit 2 FAR Part 25 Takeoff Distance Source: FAA s Pilot s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge According to the B200 performance chart, the accelerate-stop distance for a Beechcraft King Air B200 is approximately 3,800 feet with a dry runway and no flaps to produce to shortest takeoff distance. No adjustment is made for a wet runway. The takeoff distance for this aircraft is calculated at 3,800 feet, however Polaris Industries operational minimum runway length is 4,000 feet (see attached letter). Landing Distance The actual landing distance is calculated to be the distance used in landing and braking to a complete stop after crossing the runway threshold at 50 feet. Landing distance can vary depending on local conditions and exact pilot technique. Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 11

12 Exhibit 3 FAR Part 25 Landing Distance Source: FAA Because landing distance varies, FAA Advisory Circular 91-79A, Mitigating the Risks of a Runway Overrun Upon Landing recommends an additional safety margin of 15 percent be added to Part 91 requirements to avoid a runway overrun 1. To ensure that an acceptable landing distance safety margin exists at [Time of Arrival], the FAA recommends a 15 percent safety margin be applied to the actual airplane landing distance. The 15 percent safety margin is a minimum safety margin to be applied after accounting for all known variables, such as the meteorological, runway surface conditions, landing with a tailwind, airplane configuration and weight, runway slope, threshold crossing height and airspeed, and the timely utilization of ground deceleration devices. Be prepared, know the landing conditions, divert to an alternate, or go around, but do not risk a runway overrun. The landing distance on a dry runway is for the B200 is published at 3,100 feet with full flaps to produce the shortest landing length. The recommended landing distance adding a 15 percent adjustment is 3,565 feet, or rounded to 3,600 feet. Polaris Industries operational minimum runway length of 4,000 feet exceeds the calculated length. Summary The following table summarizes the recommended runway lengths for the existing design aircraft. The recommended length is based on Polaris Industries operational requirements, which is greater than standard aircraft performance charts and FAA s calculations for 100 percent of the total small aircraft fleet. 1 FAA Advisory Circular 91-79A, Mitigating the Risks of a Runway Overrun Upon Landing, Appendix 2(a) Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 12

13 Exhibit 3 Beechcraft King Air B200 Runway Length Requirements Metric/Operation Runway Length FAA AC 150/5325-4B Requirements 95 Percent of Fleet 3,300 feet 100 Percent of Fleet 3,900 feet Takeoff Length Requirements Accelerate-Stop Distance 3,800 feet Landing Length Requirements Landing Distance (Unadjusted) 3,100 feet Landing Distance (Adjusted) (1) 3,600 feet Company Requirement Polaris Industries 4,000 feet Summary Recommended Runway Length 4,000 feet Source: Beechcraft King Air B200 Airplane Flight Manual, Polaris Industries, KLJ Analysis NOTE: Runway requirements assume maximum gross takeoff weight, 78.2 F, no wind, 1060 MSL elevation, Runway lengths of 30 feet or over are rounded to the next 100-foot interval per FAA guidance. (1) Includes 15% safety margin as recommended in FAA Advisory Circular 91-79A, Mitigating the Risks of a Runway Overrun Upon Landing for FAR Part 91 operators. Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 13

14 Beechcraft King Air B200 Performance Chart: Accelerate-Stop Distance Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Maximum Takeoff Weight: 12,500 lbs. Accelerate-Stop Distance: +/- 3,800 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 14

15 Beechcraft King Air B200 Performance Chart: Landing Distance Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Maximum Landing Weight: 12,500 lbs. Landing Distance (Unfactored): 3,100 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 15

16 Beechcraft King Air B100 The 1988 Roseau Airport Master Plan study identified the Beechcraft King Air B100 as the design aircraft. The required accelerate-stop distance was calculated to be 4,400 feet. This study provided the justification to extend Runway from 3,900 feet to 4,400 foot runway at Roseau in The performance chart is included for reference. Beechcraft King Air B100 Provenance Chart: Accelerate-Stop Distance Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Maximum Landing Weight: 12,500 lbs. Accelerate-Stop Distance: 4,400 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 16

17 Proposed FAA Standard FAA AC 150/5325-4C, a proposed update to the existing FAA AC 150/5325-4B, uses a different process to determine recommended runway length at airports for aircraft between 12,500 pounds and 60,000 pounds. The design objective for a primary runway is to provide a runway length that will not result in operational weight restrictions. For federally funded projects, the criterion for regular use applies. Small Airplanes Up to 12,500 Pounds The rationale and procedures for small aircraft up to 12,500 pounds are virtually identical to that outlined in current FAA guidance. For small airplanes, the draft AC identifies the differences between the 95 and 100 percent of fleet curves are based on the airport s location and amount of existing or planned aviation activities. FAA guidance acknowledges the selection of percentage of fleet is a planning decision. If the fleet mix to operate at the airport is known, FAA recommends consulting the manufacturer s information to determine actual runway length requirements. The analysis completed in the previous section under FAA AC 150/5325-4B still applies for small aircraft. Large Airplanes Up to 60,000 Pounds For large airplanes up to 60,000 lbs., the draft FAA guidance requires the use of performance charts for individual airplanes. The general design procedure includes: 1. Calculate Take-off Weights: Determine the length of haul that is flown by airplanes on a regular use basis. Use maximum certificated takeoff weight for long-haul routes and adjust weight for shorter routes based on the payload-range chart. Determine and any performancebased weight adjustments. 2. Determine Landing Weight: Use maximum certificated landing weight. 3. Identify Flap Setting: Use flap settings that will result in shortest necessary runway length. 4. Determine Airport Data: Utilize airport elevation, mean daily maximum temperature at hottest month, dry or wet runways and runway elevation range. 5. Calculate Runway Length: Apply procedures to each Airport Planning Manual to obtain separate takeoff and landing runway length recommendations. 6. Apply Adjustments: Apply any takeoff or landing length adjustments, if necessary, to the resulting lengths. The identified future design aircraft fleet mix is a Cessna Citation XLS+ turbojet and Swearingen Metroliner turboprop. Both are large aircraft greater than 12,500 pounds but do not exceed 60,000 pounds. The following section evaluates the performance of each aircraft. Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 17

18 Future & Ultimate Design Aircraft Operational rules and specific aircraft performance of the future & ultimate design aircraft is evaluated in this section. A review of the aircraft performance charts is used to identify the recommended runway length for aircraft greater than 12,500 pounds up to 60,000 pounds under the proposed FAA AC 150/5325-4C. Where applicable, standards under FAA AC 150/5325-4B are also referenced. Operating Rules Operating rules can have a significant effect on the recommended runway length for an airplane. The two applicable operating rules are identified below. FAR Part 91 The Cessna Citation XLS+ will be operated by Polaris Industries under FAR Part 91, General Operating and Flight Rules. Most general aviation users operate under FAR Part 91 where the pilot in command is responsible for determining the runway lengths required for takeoff and landing based on aircraft performance and personal minimums. FAR Part 91 rules govern non-commercial operations. FAR Part 135 The Swearingen Metroliner III will be flown under FAR Part 135 operating rules. On-demand air-taxi and air-cargo charter operators at ROX operate under FAR Part 135, Operating Requirements for Commuter and On Demand Operations. Under FAR Part 135 operations for large transport category airplanes, additional safety factors must be added to the airplane s performance manual for normal takeoff, rejected takeoff, one-engine takeoff and landing operations. FAR and requires takeoff operations to be conducted within available runway length assuming safety factors. FAR and requires landing operations to be conducted within 60 percent of the effective length with an additional 15 percent for wet or slippery runways. Exhibit 4 FAR Part 121/135/91K Landing Distance (Wet Runway) Source: FAA Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 18

19 Cessna Citation XLS+ The Cessna Citation XLS+ is operated by Polaris Industries and is expected to become the future design aircraft. Aircraft performance charts provided by Polaris Industries were consulted to determined runway length needs. Currently, Polaris Industries does not operate this aircraft to ROX because of the runway length restriction. Based on the analysis conducted in this report, Polaris Industries requires a minimum of 4,934 feet to operate this aircraft to meet SMS operational requirements (see attached letter). Cessna Citation XLS+ (Airliners.net) This aircraft is forecast to be flown by Polaris Industries on high-load factor routes at a maximum takeoff weight. Common routes from Roseau would be to other Polaris plants in Huntsville, AL and Monterrey, Mexico. Returning international flights would clear customs in Laredo, TX. Stage lengths would be as long as 1,565 nautical miles. At this range payload is limited to 1,600 pounds, or enough weight for approximately 7 passengers and baggage. This represents a typical trip for Polaris Industries. Takeoffs would occur at the maximum takeoff operating weight of 20,200 pounds. This aircraft is certified under FAR Part 25 (Transport Category) flight rules. Sufficient runway length to satisfy the longest of the accelerate-go distance, accelerate-stop distance or takeoff distance. According to the Cessna Citation XLS+ performance calculations provided by Polaris Industries, the required takeoff distance is 4,056 feet with a dry runway, 4,414 feet for a wet runway assuming 15 degree flaps to produce to shortest takeoff distance. This length meets FAR Part 25 second segment one-engine climb requirements without restriction. Maximum landing weight of 18,700 pounds is assumed with full flaps to minimize landing distance. Airport elevation, runway gradient and temperature data is utilized. The aircraft will be flown under FAR Part 91 operating rules. The landing distance performance calculations for the Cessna Citation XLS+ provided by Polaris Industries requires 3,307 feet for a dry runway and 4,934 feet for a wet runway (rounded to 5,000 feet) with full flaps to produce the shortest landing length. Based on this operational data Polaris Industries the recommended operational runway length is 5,000 feet to utilize the Roseau Municipal Airport without significant restrictions. Exhibit 5 Cessna Citation XLS+ Runway Length Requirements Metric/Operation Runway Length Takeoff Length Requirements (1) Takeoff Field MTOW, 15 Flaps (Dry) 4,056 feet Takeoff Field MTOW, 15 Flaps (Wet) 4,414 feet Landing Length Requirements Landing MLW (Dry) 3,307 feet Landing MLW (Wet) 4,934 feet Summary Recommended Runway Length 5,000 feet Source: Polaris Industries, Cessna, KLJ Analysis MTOW = Maximum Takeoff Weight, MLW = Maximum Landing Weight NOTE: Runway requirements assume 26 C, no wind, 1060 MSL elevation, 0.3% runway gradient. (1) Per FAR 25, Takeoff Field Length is the greater of accelerate-stop, accelerate-go with one engine inoperative, or 115% of the all engine takeoff distance to a point 35 feet above the runway. Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 19

20 Cessna Citation XLS+ Range / Payload Capability Chart ROX-MTY: 1,565 N.M. Source: Cessna Citation XLS+ Flight Planning Guide Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 20

21 Cessna Citation XLS+ Performance Chart: Takeoff Field Length (15 Flaps) Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Maximum Takeoff Weight: 20,200 lbs. Wet Runway, 15 Flaps Takeoff Field Length: 4,400 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 21

22 Cessna Citation XLS+ Performance Chart: Landing Performance Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Maximum Landing Weight: 18,700 lbs. Wet Runway, Full Flaps Landing Distance: 5,000 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 22

23 Ultimate Corporate Aircraft Additional corporate aircraft types that could potentially utilize ROX in the ultimate period were identified to determine ultimate runway length needs at ROX. It was assumed that the corporate aircraft fleet would remain within the FAA s 75 percent of the aircraft fleet greater than 12,500 pounds up to 60,000 pounds at 60 percent useful load per FAA AC 150/5325-4B. A typical aircraft would be the Cessna Citation 680 Sovereign operated under FAR Part 91. This representative aircraft is classified as FAA Airport Reference Code (ARC) B-II with a maximum takeoff weight of 30,300 pounds. No larger or more demanding aircraft classified under FAA s 100 percent of fleet, 90 percent useful load or ARC C-II are expected to occur on a regular basis at ROX. Commercial operations under FAR Part 135, with additional runway length requirements, are also not expected to occur on a regular basis from corporate aircraft alone. For long-term planning purposes, no specific aircraft performance data was used for a runway length analysis to follow proposed FAA AC 150/5325-4C. It is estimated however that the actual FAR Part 91 runway length requirements of the Cessna Citation 680 would be similar or slightly greater than the Cessna Citation XLS+ analyzed earlier. By utilizing the methodology identified in FAA AC 150/5325-4B, the recommended runway length for 75 percent of the fleet at 60 percent useful load at ROX is 5,500 feet during wet or contaminated runway conditions. Swearingen Metroliner III The Swearingen Metroliner III is a large turboprop (turbinepowered) aircraft operated by Encore Air Cargo for allcargo charter flights. This airplane is operated by one of the on-demand contract carriers used to support Polaris Industries just-in-time delivery of parts to support the local manufacturing plant. This aircraft is expected to become part of the fleet mix for the ultimate design aircraft. Cessna Citation 680 (Airliners.net) The maximum gross weight of this airplane is 16,000 pounds. The aircraft s performance charts from the Flight Swearingen Metroliner III (Airliners.net) Planning Guide was consulted to determine runway length. This aircraft will be flown on high load factor short-haul routes to ROX. The aircraft at ROX will land at maximum landing weight and takeoff from ROX with additional fuel but a reduced payload. The estimated takeoff weight is 14,000 pounds rather than maximum takeoff weight as cargo is typically shipped to, not from, Roseau. The standard takeoff field length flap setting is ¼ to produce the minimum takeoff distance. Airport elevation, runway gradient and temperature data is utilized. This aircraft will be operated under FAR Part 135 on-demand flight rules which required landing length adjustments for dry and wet runways. The calculated runway lengths are identified below. The total recommended length to accommodate regular use of this aircraft under FAR Part 135 operations at ROX is 5,600 feet required during wet or contaminated runway conditions. Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 23

24 Exhibit 6 Swearingen Metroliner III Runway Length Requirements Metric/Operation Runway Length Takeoff Length Requirements Takeoff Field 14,000 lbs., Dry (1) 4,350 feet Recommended Takeoff Length (2) 4,500 feet Landing Length Requirements (3) Unadjusted Landing Field MLW 2,900 feet Landing Field MLW (Part 135) 4,900 feet Landing Field MLW, Wet (Part 135) 5,600 feet Summary Recommended Runway Length 5,600 feet Source: Swearingen Metroliner III Airplane Performance Manual, KLJ Analysis NOTE: Runway requirements assume maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), 78.2 F, no wind, 1060 MSL elevation, 14 runway elevation difference. Runway lengths of 30 feet or over are rounded to the next 100-foot interval per FAA guidance. MLW = Maximum Landing Weight (1) Takeoff Field Length is the greater of accelerate-stop, accelerate-go with one engine inoperative, or 115% of the all engine takeoff distance to a point 35 feet above the runway. (2) Runway Length is adjusted based on runway gradient at a rate of 10 feet for each foot of elevation difference between the high and low points of the runway centerline (14 feet of grade change = +140 feet of runway length) (3) Adjusted length includes required 60 percent landing distance factor for stopping operations and additional wet runway factor of 15 percent (if applicable) per FAR Part Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 24

25 Metro III Performance Chart: Accelerate-Stop Distance Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Assumed Takeoff Weight: 14,000 lbs. Dry Runway Takeoff Distance (Unfactored): 4,350 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 25

26 Metro III Performance Chart: Landing Distance Roseau Municipal Airport/Rudy Billberg Field Temperature: 78.2 F / 25.7 C - Airport Elevation: 1,060 MSL Maximum Landing Weight: 16,000 lbs. Dry Runway Landing Distance (Unfactored): 2,900 feet Appendix X: Runway Length Analysis Page 26

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport APPENDIX 2 Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport May 11, 2009 Version 2 (draft) Table of Contents Introduction... 1-1 Section 1 Purpose & Need... 1-2 Section 2 Design Standards...1-3 Section

More information

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT

FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT D.3 RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS Appendix D Purpose and Need THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Appendix D Purpose and Need APPENDIX D.3 AIRFIELD GEOMETRIC REQUIREMENTS This information provided in this appendix

More information

Facility Requirements

Facility Requirements C H A P T E R T H R E E Facility Requirements 3.0 OVERVIEW Airport planning for facility requirements is based upon addressing any existing issues and accommodating the probable demand that may occur over

More information

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Spring 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Spring 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia CEE 4674 Airport Planning and Design Runway Length Calculations Addendum 1 Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Spring 2015 Blacksburg,

More information

CESSNA CITATION IIB PW JT15D-4 INTRODUCTION. Runway Analysis provides the means to determine maximum allowable takeoff and landing weights based upon:

CESSNA CITATION IIB PW JT15D-4 INTRODUCTION. Runway Analysis provides the means to determine maximum allowable takeoff and landing weights based upon: CESSNA CITATION IIB PW JT15D-4 INTRODUCTION Runway Analysis provides the means to determine maximum allowable takeoff and landing weights based upon: Airport characteristics consisting of airport elevation,

More information

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. January 27, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia

Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. January 27, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor of Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University January 27, 2009 Blacksburg, Virginia 1 Runway Design Assumptions (FAA 150/5325-4b) Applicable to

More information

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include: 4.1 INTRODUCTION The previous chapters have described the existing facilities and provided planning guidelines as well as a forecast of demand for aviation activity at North Perry Airport. The demand/capacity

More information

Planning Horizon Activity Levels Airfield Capacity and Delay Airport Physical Planning Criteria Airfield and Landside Facility Requirements

Planning Horizon Activity Levels Airfield Capacity and Delay Airport Physical Planning Criteria Airfield and Landside Facility Requirements Proper airport planning requires the translation of forecast aviation demand into the specific types and quantities of facilities that can adequately serve the identified demand. This chapter will analyze

More information

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3 Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3 Date: 04/12/18 Public Involvement Plan Update Defining the System Recommended Classifications Discussion Break Review current system Outreach what we heard Proposed changes Classification

More information

Jet Transport Airplane Performance - Briefing For Business Aviation Pilots & Operators

Jet Transport Airplane Performance - Briefing For Business Aviation Pilots & Operators Jet Transport Airplane Performance - Briefing For Business Aviation Pilots & Operators Presented to: By: Date: NBAA 2013 Convention Transport Airplane Performance Planning Working Group 22 October 2013

More information

CESSNA SECTION 5 PERFORMANCE

CESSNA SECTION 5 PERFORMANCE CESSNA SECTION 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction............................................5-3 Use of Performance Charts................................5-3 Sample Problem........................................5-4

More information

TAKEOFF SAFETY ISSUE 2-11/2001. Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance

TAKEOFF SAFETY ISSUE 2-11/2001. Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance TAKEOFF SAFETY T R A I N I N G A I D ISSUE 2-11/2001 Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance Introduction The purpose of this brochure is to provide the

More information

Weight and Balance User Guide

Weight and Balance User Guide Weight and Balance User Guide Selecting the Weight and Balance tab brings up the Departure and Destination screen, used for initiating the process for a standalone WB report. Select the tail to be used

More information

USE OF TAKEOFF CHARTS [B737]

USE OF TAKEOFF CHARTS [B737] USE OF TAKEOFF CHARTS [B737] 1. Introducton This documentation presents an example of takeoff performance calculations for Boeing 737. It is called self-dispatch, primarily used by airline crew if that

More information

INTERIM RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY

INTERIM RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY Interim Runway Safety Area Study September 2017 INTERIM RUNWAY SAFETY AREA STUDY YEAGER AIRPORT PREPARED FOR: THE CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY PREPARED BY: LANDRUM & BROWN TEAM SEPTEMBER

More information

March 2016 Safety Meeting

March 2016 Safety Meeting March 2016 Safety Meeting AC 61 98C Subject: Currency Requirements and Guidance for the Flight Review and Instrument Proficiency Check Date: 11/20/15 AC No: 61-98C Initiated by: AFS-800 Supercedes: AC

More information

FIJI ISLANDS AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

FIJI ISLANDS AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR ANR 31 REFERS FIJI ISLANDS AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR Civil Aviation Authority of Fiji Private Bag (NAP0354), Nadi Airport Fiji Tel: (679) 6721 555; Fax (679) 6721 500 Website: www.caafi.org.fj

More information

FAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance

FAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance FAA Requirements for Engine-out Procedures and Obstacle Clearance Presentation to: CAAC Engine-out Procedures Seminar Name: Chuck Friesenhahn Date: 11/29/2005 Flight Standards Senior Advisor, Advanced

More information

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS AIRSIDE CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS This Section investigates the capacity of the airport, its ability to meet current demand, and the facilities required to meet forecasted needs as established

More information

Citation XLS Analysis - Owner & Charter Hour Contributions. Prepared March 31, 2017

Citation XLS Analysis - Owner & Charter Hour Contributions. Prepared March 31, 2017 Citation XLS Analysis - Owner & Charter Hour Contributions Prepared March 31, 2017 Aviation's Most Real World Operating Cost Application. Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Cessna Citation XLS Min Crew / Max

More information

Quiet Climb. 26 AERO First-Quarter 2003 January

Quiet Climb. 26 AERO First-Quarter 2003 January Quiet Climb Boeing has developed the Quiet Climb System, an automated avionics feature for quiet procedures that involve thrust cutback after takeoff. By reducing and restoring thrust automatically, the

More information

FUEL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT

FUEL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT FUEL MANAGEMENT FOR COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT 1. Introduction An aeroplane shall carry a sufficient amount of usable fuel to complete the planned flight safely and to allow for deviation from the planned operation.

More information

CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION

CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION An Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates the effects of a proposed Federal action on the surrounding environment and is prepared in compliance

More information

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements

Chapter 5 Facility Requirements Chapter 5 Facility Requirements 50 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the airside and landside facility requirements necessary to accommodate existing and forecasted demand in accordance with Federal

More information

UNITED KINGDOM AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR

UNITED KINGDOM AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR UNITED KINGDOM AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR AIC 127/2006 (Pink 110) 7 December NATS Limited Aeronautical Information Service Control Tower Building, London Heathrow Airport Hounslow, Middlesex TW6

More information

Assignment 2: Runway Length Analysis

Assignment 2: Runway Length Analysis CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2018 Date Due: February 2, 2018 (Ground Hog Day) Assignment 2: Runway Length Analysis Instructor: Trani Reading Assignment: Review Chapters 1 through 3 of the

More information

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis Appendix B ULTIMATE AIRPORT CAPACITY & DELAY SIMULATION MODELING ANALYSIS B TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS TABLES B.1 Introduction... 1 B.2 Simulation Modeling Assumption and Methodology... 4 B.2.1 Runway

More information

Revised National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (NADPs) Noise Compatibility Committee

Revised National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (NADPs) Noise Compatibility Committee Revised National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (NADPs) Presentation to: Noise Compatibility Committee October 29, 2015 Ted Baldwin What are NADPs? Departure

More information

Chapter III - Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements

Chapter III - Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements Chapter III - Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements The facility requirements identified in this chapter are summarized on Exhibit III.1. The future requirements serve to determine which airport facilities

More information

Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level

Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2014 Solution! Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design Instructor: Trani Problem 1 A new airport to be constructed near Mexico City airport would like to

More information

3.1 Facility Requirements Overview Airfield Facility Requirements... 1

3.1 Facility Requirements Overview Airfield Facility Requirements... 1 Table of Contents 3.1 Overview... 1 3.2 Airfield... 1 Airspace Capacity...1 Airside Capacity... 2 Aircraft Mix Index... 3 Arrivals Percentage... 4 Touch-and-Go Percentage... 4 Taxiway Access Factors...

More information

PLU Airport Master Plan. Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #4 March 19, 2018

PLU Airport Master Plan. Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #4 March 19, 2018 PLU Airport Master Plan Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Meeting #4 March 19, 2018 Meeting Agenda 1. Master Plan Status [5 Minutes] 2. Preferred Forecasts [15 Minutes] 3. Runway Length Options [45

More information

Technical Memorandum. 1. Executive Summary

Technical Memorandum. 1. Executive Summary Technical Memorandum To: Pullman-Moscow Regional Airport FAA Seattle Airports District Office From: Mead & Hunt Date: January 28, 2011 Subject: PUW Master Plan Study Phase II Runway Length Requirements

More information

Advisory Circular (AC)

Advisory Circular (AC) Advisory Circular (AC) Certification of Transport Category Aeroplanes On Narrow Runways File No. 5009-6-525 AC No. 525-014 RDIMS No. 528471-V3 Issue No. 01 Issuing Branch Aircraft Certification Effective

More information

CRUISE TABLE OF CONTENTS

CRUISE TABLE OF CONTENTS CRUISE FLIGHT 2-1 CRUISE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT PAGE CRUISE FLIGHT... 3 FUEL PLANNING SCHEMATIC 737-600... 5 FUEL PLANNING SCHEMATIC 737-700... 6 FUEL PLANNING SCHEMATIC 737-800... 7 FUEL PLANNING SCHEMATIC

More information

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail King Air 350i Annual & Hourly Cost Detail GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 2 / 8 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 1404.00 / 1615.69 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 302.25 / 347.82 Average Pre-Owned

More information

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW This summary is intended to provide a brief overview of the key issues associated with conformance to FAA standards at Methow Valley State Airport.

More information

CHAPTER 5 AEROPLANE PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS

CHAPTER 5 AEROPLANE PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS CHAP 5-1 CHAPTER 5 PERFORMANCE OPERATING LIMITATIONS 5.1 GENERAL 5.1.1 Aeroplanes shall be operated in accordance with a comprehensive and detailed code of performance established by the Civil Aviation

More information

FLIGHT AND OPERATING MANUAL SUPPLEMENT FMS305902, REVISION 1 SEAPLANES WEST INC.

FLIGHT AND OPERATING MANUAL SUPPLEMENT FMS305902, REVISION 1 SEAPLANES WEST INC. FLIGHT AND OPERATING MANUAL SUPPLEMENT FMS305902, REVISION 1 AEROCET 3500/3500L FLOAT INSTALLATION ON CESSNA 182E THROUGH 182N AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT MODEL: AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION: AIRCRAFT SERIAL NUMBER: TRANSPORT

More information

Airport Obstruction Standards

Airport Obstruction Standards Airport Obstruction Standards Dr. Antonio Trani Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Virginia Tech Outline of this Presentation Obstructions to navigation around airports Discussion of Federal

More information

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration Chapter 4 Page 65 AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY The purpose of this Demand/Capacity Analysis is to examine the capability of the Albert Whitted Airport (SPG) to meet the needs of its users. In doing so, this

More information

1 DRAFT. General Aviation Terminal Services Aircraft Hangars Aircraft Parking Aprons Airport Support Facilities

1 DRAFT. General Aviation Terminal Services Aircraft Hangars Aircraft Parking Aprons Airport Support Facilities To properly plan for improvements at Dallas Executive Airport, it is necessary to translate forecast aviation demand into the specific types and quantities of facilities that can adequately serve the demand.

More information

Chapter 4: Facility Requirements

Chapter 4: Facility Requirements Chapter 4: Facility Requirements 1 Rapid City Regional Airport Master Plan Update Chapter 4 Facility Requirements Introduction This chapter of the Airport Master Plan analyzes the existing and anticipated

More information

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION 1.1.3 Taxiways EWN has an extensive network of taxiways and taxilanes connecting the terminal, air cargo, and general aviation areas with the runways as listed in Figure 1-15. A 50-foot wide parallel taxiway

More information

The forecasts evaluated in this appendix are prepared for based aircraft, general aviation, military and overall activity.

The forecasts evaluated in this appendix are prepared for based aircraft, general aviation, military and overall activity. Chapter 3: Forecast Introduction Forecasting provides an airport with a general idea of the magnitude of growth, as well as fluctuations in activity anticipated, over a 20-year forecast period. Forecasting

More information

Runway Analysis User Guide

Runway Analysis User Guide Runway Analysis User Guide The Runway Analysis & Weight and Balance functions are accessed by selecting Runway Analysis & Weight and Balance from the Flight Plan drop down menu. Select the tail to be used

More information

Chapter 3. Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements

Chapter 3. Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Chapter 3. Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Chapter 3. DEMAND/CAPACITY & FACILITY REQUIREMENTS This chapter provides an assessment of future airport development requirements based upon the forecasts

More information

IATA Air Carrier Self Audit Checklist Analysis Questionnaire

IATA Air Carrier Self Audit Checklist Analysis Questionnaire IATA Air Carrier Self Audit Checklist Analysis Questionnaire Purpose Runway Excursion Prevention Air Carrier Self Audit Checklist The Flight Safety Foundation (FSF) Reducing the Risk of Runway Excursions

More information

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update Ultimate ASV, Runway Use and Flight Tracks 4th Working Group Briefing 8/13/18 Meeting Purpose Discuss Public Workshop input

More information

AIRFIELD CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

AIRFIELD CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER FOUR: AIRFIELD CAPACITY AND FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 4.1 INTRODUCTION A key step in the Airport Master Plan Update (AMPU) process is determining future requirements for airport facilities that will

More information

Advisory Circular. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration

Advisory Circular. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Mitigating the Risks of a Runway Overrun Upon Landing Date: 9/17/14 Initiated by: AFS-800 AC No: 91-79A Change:

More information

AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 4.1 INTRODUCTION Chapter 4 AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS The major elements of the Airport, which were described in Chapter 3, Existing Airport Facilities must be analyzed individually and balanced in

More information

USE OF LANDING CHARTS [B737]

USE OF LANDING CHARTS [B737] USE OF LANDING CHARTS [B737] 1. Introducton The landing stage of a flight is usually the path from 50 ft above the landing threshold and the place where an airplane comes to a complete stop. The 50 ft

More information

Operational impact of and Appendix O

Operational impact of and Appendix O Operational impact of 25.1420 and Appendix O Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA Aviation Safety Inspector; AFS-400 Date: February 25, 2015 Background New regulation, CFR 25.1420 and associated Part 25, Appendix

More information

Falcon 2000S & Challenger 350 Analysis

Falcon 2000S & Challenger 350 Analysis Falcon 2000S & Challenger 350 Analysis Aviation's Most Real World Operating Cost Application. Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Dassault Falcon 2000S Min Crew / Max Passengers 2 / 10 Seats Full Range (NM / SM)

More information

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016 Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016 Agenda Welcome / Introductions Master Plan Process and Project Status Forecast of Aviation Demand

More information

CHAPTER 2 AIRCRAFT INFORMATION SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 2 AIRCRAFT INFORMATION SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 2 AIRCRAFT INFORMATION SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS General...2 Kinds of Operations...2 Structural and weight limitations...2 Maneuvering limitations...3 Flight load factor limitations...3 Power plant

More information

Citizens Advisory Council Meeting #3

Citizens Advisory Council Meeting #3 Citizens Advisory Council Meeting #3 Ann Arbor Municipal Airport Environmental Assessment February 22, 2010 3:00 pm 4:30 pm 1. Introductions 3:00-3:10 2. Environmental Studies Update 3:10-3:20 a. Wetland

More information

EDTO SARPS FROM ANNEX 6 PART 1

EDTO SARPS FROM ANNEX 6 PART 1 EDTO SARPS FROM ANNE 6 PART 1 4.7.1 Requirements for operations beyond 60 minutes to an en route alternate aerodrome STATE (SRVSOP) IMPLEMENTATION YES Regulation ref. no. NO LAR 121.2581 4.7.1.1 Operators

More information

Valley Fliers 1402 Auburn Way North, #223 Auburn WA 98002

Valley Fliers 1402 Auburn Way North, #223 Auburn WA 98002 Valley Fliers 1402 Auburn Way North, #223 Auburn WA 98002 Instructor: Check Out Date: Phase 1: Pre-Flight Name: Certificate Number: Certificate Type: Ratings: Total Flight Time: Last 90 Days: Club check

More information

PRE-SOLO WRITTEN EXAM. Student Name:

PRE-SOLO WRITTEN EXAM. Student Name: PRE-SOLO WRITTEN EXAM Student Name: Date: Instructor Name: INTRODUCTION As specified in FAR 61.87, you must demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of appropriate portions of FAR Parts 61 and 91 to an authorized

More information

READY TO TAKE MORE, FARTHER

READY TO TAKE MORE, FARTHER CITATION M2 READY TO TAKE MORE, FARTHER You re ready for more speed, more range and more comfort serious jet performance. The Cessna Citation M2 aircraft is ready for you. We designed this Citation to

More information

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Embraer Phenom 300 GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 2 / 7 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 1662.38 / 1913.03 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 419.25 / 482.46 Average Pre-Owned

More information

Key Purpose & Need Issues

Key Purpose & Need Issues Key Purpose & Need Issues Efficiently meet demand through the 2025 planning horizon 864,000+ annual operations 180-200 operations during peak daytime hours Balance peak hour arrival/departure capability

More information

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Annual & Hourly Cost Detail EADS Socata TBM 700C2 GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 1 / 5 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 975.00 / 1122.01 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 282.75 / 325.38 Average

More information

PRESOLO WRITTEN EXAM

PRESOLO WRITTEN EXAM PRESOLO WRITTEN EXAM Date of Exam STUDENT INFORMATION Student Name Student Pilot Certificate Number FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION Instructor Instructor Certificate Number 1 INTRODUCTION Student Actions:

More information

Forecast Data specific to SDM... 6 Aviation Industry Trends Collection of Other Data... 12

Forecast Data specific to SDM... 6 Aviation Industry Trends Collection of Other Data... 12 Working Paper 2 Forecasts of Aviation Demand Table of Contents 2.1 Forecast Overview... 1 2.2 Identification of Aviation Demand Elements... 2 2.3 Data Sources... 3 2.4 Historical and Existing Aviation

More information

(ii) Weight. Maximum gross weight for all tests, except where otherwise described in subparagraph (iii) below.

(ii) Weight. Maximum gross weight for all tests, except where otherwise described in subparagraph (iii) below. (2) Analysis of System. An analysis of the control system should be completed before conducting the loss of the primary lateral control test. On some airplanes, the required single lateral control system

More information

DRAFT Environmental Assessment for Ann Arbor Municipal Airport Ann Arbor, Michigan

DRAFT Environmental Assessment for Ann Arbor Municipal Airport Ann Arbor, Michigan DRAFT Environmental Assessment for Ann Arbor Municipal Airport Ann Arbor, Michigan Prepared for: City of Ann Arbor Michigan Department of Transportation - Office of Aeronautics and Federal Aviation Administration

More information

Airplane Performance. Introduction. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Airplane Performance. Introduction. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved. Introduction Airplane Performance The statements contained herein are based on good faith assumptions and provided for general information purposes only. These statements do not constitute an offer, promise,

More information

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 3.0 ALTERNATIVES The 2010 Stevensville Airport Master Plan contained five (5) airside development options designed to meet projected demands. Each of the options from

More information

Head-up Guidance & Vision Technologies Enabling Safer and More Efficient Airline Operations

Head-up Guidance & Vision Technologies Enabling Safer and More Efficient Airline Operations Head-up Guidance & Vision Technologies Enabling Safer and More Efficient Airline Operations March, 2017 2017 Rockwell 2017 Collins. Rockwell Collins. Agenda > HGS Introduction > HGS Value Safety & Economics

More information

Landing on Slippery Runways. BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright 2007 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Landing on Slippery Runways. BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright 2007 Boeing. All rights reserved. Landing on Slippery Runways WARNING: Export Controlled This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, Title 50, U.S.C.; App. 2401,

More information

Commercial Pilot Practical Test Briefing

Commercial Pilot Practical Test Briefing Commercial Pilot Practical Test Briefing 1. What certificates and documents must you have on board the aircraft prior to flight? 2. Locate the following inspections, as appropriate, in the airframe and

More information

SAFETY HIGHLIGHTS CESSNA CITATION AOPA AIR SAFETY INSTITUTE 1 SAFETY HIGHLIGHTS CESSNA CITATION

SAFETY HIGHLIGHTS CESSNA CITATION AOPA AIR SAFETY INSTITUTE 1 SAFETY HIGHLIGHTS CESSNA CITATION SAFETY HIGHLIGHTS CESSNA CITATION AOPA AIR SAFETY INSTITUTE 1 SAFETY HIGHLIGHTS CESSNA CITATION Introduction: Cessna s Citation jet series was initially created as a light jet for the business market.

More information

PORT OF PORTLAND. Chapter Four AVIATION FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

PORT OF PORTLAND. Chapter Four AVIATION FACILITY REQUIREMENTS PORT OF PORTLAND Chapter Four AVIATION FACILITY REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER FOUR PORT OF PORTLAND AVIATION FACILITY REQUIREMENTS In this chapter, existing components of the airport are evaluated to identify the

More information

READY TO TAKE MORE, FARTHER

READY TO TAKE MORE, FARTHER CITATION M2 READY TO TAKE MORE, FARTHER You re ready for more speed, more range and more comfort serious jet performance. The Cessna Citation M2 aircraft is ready for you. We designed this Citation to

More information

Dallas Executive Airport Town Hall Meeting April 3, 2014

Dallas Executive Airport Town Hall Meeting April 3, 2014 Dallas Executive Airport Town Hall Meeting April 3, 2014 Background 1,040 acre general aviation facility owned and operated by the City of Dallas 150 based aircraft including business jets and helicopters,

More information

C I T A T I O N C J 3 +

C I T A T I O N C J 3 + CITATION CJ3+ BEST IN CLASS JUST GOT BETTER Step into the reliable choice the Cessna Citation CJ3 + aircraft. With superior efficiency and light-jet performance, the CJ3+ is also the natural choice. Its

More information

CATCODE ] CATCODE

CATCODE ] CATCODE Runways. FAC: 1111 CATCODE: 111111 OPR: AFCEC/COS OCR: AF/A3O-A 1.1. Description. The runway is the paved surface provided for normal aircraft landings and take offs. Runways are classified as either Class

More information

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology FLIGHT SERVICES Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology Michael Roginski, PE, Principal Engineer Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering ALACPA X Seminar, Mexico City, Mexico September 30-

More information

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology

Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology FLIGHT SERVICES Runway Roughness Evaluation- Boeing Bump Methodology Michael Roginski, PE, Principal Engineer Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering ALACPA X Seminar, Mexico City, Mexico September 3-

More information

Helicopter Performance. Performance Class 1. Jim Lyons

Helicopter Performance. Performance Class 1. Jim Lyons Helicopter Performance Performance Class 1 Jim Lyons What is Performance Class 1 Content of Presentation Elements of a Category A Take-off Procedure (CS/FAR 29) PC1 Take-off Requirements PC1

More information

APPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR

APPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR APPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR This appendix sets forth the detailed input data that was used to prepare noise exposure contours for 2022 Baseline conditions. H.1 DATA SOURCES AND ASSUMPTIONS

More information

CHAPTER 3 PREFLIGHT ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 3 PREFLIGHT ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 3 PREFLIGHT ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Cessna 172 Flight Standards Manual GENERAL...2 Preflight Action Philosophy...2 Flight Crew Preflight Procedures...2 Blank TOLD Card (both sides)...3 Blank Flight/Weather

More information

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update. Ultimate Operations 5th Working Group Briefing 9/25/18

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update. Ultimate Operations 5th Working Group Briefing 9/25/18 Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update Ultimate Operations 5th Working Group Briefing 9/25/18 Meeting Purpose Discuss methodology of Ultimate build scenario operations

More information

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS Airport Master Plan Santa Barbara Airport As part of this Airport Master Plan, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires the development

More information

ONE-ENGINE INOPERATIVE FLIGHT

ONE-ENGINE INOPERATIVE FLIGHT ONE-ENGINE INOPERATIVE FLIGHT 1. Introduction When an engine fails in flight in a turbojet, there are many things the pilots need to be aware of to fly the airplane safely and get it on the ground. This

More information

Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc

Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc. Springfield / Branson Regional Airport 2755 N. General Aviation Ave., Springfield, Missouri 65803 (417) 865-1879 # 0r Fax (417) 865-6884

More information

3. Aviation Activity Forecasts

3. Aviation Activity Forecasts 3. Aviation Activity Forecasts This section presents forecasts of aviation activity for the Airport through 2029. Forecasts were developed for enplaned passengers, air carrier and regional/commuter airline

More information

CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER 5 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS This chapter identifies the requirements for airfield and landside facilities to accommodate the forecast demand level. Facility requirements have been developed for the

More information

AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT AND RELATED PRODUCTS. 1. PURPOSE. This change is issued to incorporate revised operating limitations.

AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT AND RELATED PRODUCTS. 1. PURPOSE. This change is issued to incorporate revised operating limitations. 8130.2D 2/15/00 AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT AND RELATED PRODUCTS 1. PURPOSE. This change is issued to incorporate revised operating limitations. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This change is distributed

More information

Figure 3.1. Foreign Airport Assessment Aid

Figure 3.1. Foreign Airport Assessment Aid 01 oauu-t.d Foreign Airport Assessment Aid: Date of Assessment: Assessment Conducted by: Airport ICAO/IATA Identification: Hours of Operation: Figure 3.1. Foreign Airport Assessment Aid [ Airport Name:

More information

FAA APPROVED AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL SUPPLEMENT

FAA APPROVED AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL SUPPLEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL TYPE CERTIFICATE NUMBER SA11103SC HALO 250 COMMUTER CATEGORY CONVERSION OF BEECHCRAFT KING AIR 200 SERIES AIRPLANES FAA APPROVED Airplane Serial No: This supplement must be attached to the

More information

PRIVATE PILOT STUDENT RECORD

PRIVATE PILOT STUDENT RECORD PRIVATE PILOT STUDENT RECORD CHECK-IN AND ORIENTATION REQUIRED BEFORE FIRST FLIGHT!! TSA Documentation: Must keep photocopies of ALL in student s folder for 5 years. Student Name: US Citizen: Unexpired

More information

CHAPTER 4 DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS

CHAPTER 4 DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS CHAPTER DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION The demand/capacity analysis examines the capability of the airfield system at Blue Grass Airport (LEX) to address existing levels of activity as well as determine

More information

This advisory circular relates specifically to Civil Aviation Rule Part 21, Subpart I Special Flight Permits.

This advisory circular relates specifically to Civil Aviation Rule Part 21, Subpart I Special Flight Permits. Advisory Circular AC21-9 Revision 0 Special Flight Permits 2 October 2014 General Civil Aviation Authority advisory circulars contain information about standards, practices and procedures that the Director

More information

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Introduction

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Introduction Chapter 5 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Introduction The facility requirements section of this study defines the physical facilities needed to safely and efficiently accommodate the current and future aviation

More information

Runway Excursion 2018 projects ALTA 2018

Runway Excursion 2018 projects ALTA 2018 Runway Excursion 2018 projects ALTA 2018 Mayor cities workshops Pilots and controller's simulator section visit Proposed cities Miami, Mexico City, El Salvador, San Jose, Panama City, Bogota, Lima, Santiago,

More information

Dave Burr - AFS-260. Steve Gibbs AFS-300

Dave Burr - AFS-260. Steve Gibbs AFS-300 MASTER MINIMUM EQUIPMENT LIST Dave Burr - AFS-260 Steve Gibbs AFS-300 Page 1 of 48 PRESENTATION OUTLINE The Flight Standards Service Aircraft Evaluation Groups Master Minimum Equipment List Page 2 of 48

More information