Passenger Facility Charge Application #1

Transcription

1 Passenger Facility Charge Application #1 February 2017

2

3

4 APPLICATION

5

6 PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT PFC ASSURANCES CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned Chair of the Charlotte County Airport Authority assures and certifies, with respect to the PFC application and projects including each individual project work element submitted in its application to impose a PFC at the Punta Gorda Airport: 1) Responsibility and authority of the public agency. It has legal authority to impose a PFC and to finance and carry out the proposed project; that a resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the public agency s governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the public agency to act in connection with the application. 2) Compliance with regulation. It will comply with all provisions of 14 CFR Part ) Compliance with state and local laws and regulations. It has complied, or will comply, with all applicable State and local laws and regulations. 4) Environmental, airspace and airport layout plan requirements. It will not use PFC revenue on a project until the FAA has notified the public agency that: a) Any actions required under the National Environmental Policy act of 1969 have been completed; b) The appropriate airspace finding has been made; and c) The FAA Airport Layout Plan (ALP) with respect to the project has been approved. 5) Nonexclusivity of contractual agreements. It will not enter into any exclusive long-term lease or use agreement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier for projects funded with PFC revenue. Such leases or use agreements will not preclude the public agency from funding, developing, or assigning new capacity at the airport with PFC revenue. 6) Carryover provisions. It will not enter into any lease or use agreement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier for a facility financed in whole or in part with revenue derived from a PFC if such agreement for such facility contains a carryover provision regarding a renewal option which, upon expiration of the original lease, would operate to automatically extend the term of such agreement with such carrier in preference to any potentially competing air carrier or foreign air carrier seeking to negotiate a lease or use agreement for such facilities. 7) Competitive access. It agrees that any lease or use agreement between the public agency and any air carrier or foreign air carrier for any facility financed in whole or in part with revenue derived from a PFC will contain a provision that permits a public agency to terminate the lease or use agreement if:

7

8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

9 CHARLOTTE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY (CCAA) PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT (PGD) CIP ANALYSIS PROJECT COST FAA FDOT CCAA FUNDED SIB FUNDED TOTAL Estimated Entitlement Funds $2,531,906 FBO DESIGN , , , ,000 MASTER PLAN ,100, ,000 55,000 55,000 1,100,000 GA Apron / TW Design / Construct ,000,000 2,700, , ,000 3,000,000 PARKING LOT EXIT , , , ,000 New 100 space Lot Equipment ,000 60,000 60, Spaces Parking Lot , , , ,000 5,170,000 3,960, , ,000 4,850,000 Estimated Entitlement Funds $2,953,600 TERMINAL APRON CONSTRUCT ,330,000 1,197,000 66,500 66,500 1,330,000 TERMINAL / APRON DESIGN , ,000 15,000 15, ,000 FBO ,400,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 2,400,000 4,030,000 1,467,000 1,281,500 81,500 1,200,000 4,030,000 $2,340,000 Entitlement Funds NORTHRAMP Overlay / Seal ,500,000 1,350,000 75,000 75,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,350,000 75,000 75,000 1,500,000 $2,340,000 Entitlement Funds SOUTHRAMP Overlay / Seal ,500,000 1,350,000 75,000 75,000 1,500,000 MAINTENANCE FACILITY , , , ,000 2,000,000 1,350, , ,000 2,000,000 $2,340,000 Entitlement Funds RW 4 22 OVERLAY ,000,000 2,700, , ,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,700, , ,000 3,000,000 MAINTENANCE FACILITY , , , ,000 Perimeter Road Phase ,500,000 2,250, , ,000 2,500,000 Construct Customs Facility , , , ,000 RW OVERLAY ,250,000 2,025, , ,500 2,250,000 9/27 Convert to TW H ,000,000 3,600, , ,000 4,000,000 Perimeter Road Phase ,500,000 2,250, , ,000 2,500,000 RW 4 22 Ext EA , ,000 30,000 30, ,000 Design and Construct 22 End ext ,105,400 1,894, , ,270 2,105,400 Purchase Mitigation Credits ,500,000 1,350,000 75,000 75,000 1,500,000 TW D Rehab ,000,000 1,800, , ,000 2,000,000 PARKING LOT EXPANSION (WHEN NEEDED) 800, , , ,000 19,505,400 15,709,860 1,897,770 1,897,770 19,505,400 35,205,400 35,205,400 4,394,270 3,194,270 1,200,000 35,205,400

10 PROJECT INFORMATION/ ATTACHMENT Bs

11 Project Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $131,966 (Local match AIP # ) Pay-as-you-go $19,795 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $151,761 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $2,507, $376,104 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $2,883,468 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0

12 Project Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation Other Funds: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $3,035,229 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis

13 Project Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Terminal Complex North Apron. The project includes the demolition of the existing pavement and the construction of two pavement sections, one rigid and one flexible, of adequate strength for the aircraft utilizing the apron. The reconstructed pavement was approximately 22,253 square yards of 12 portland cement concrete pavement. This project was designed to ADG-III standards. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A

14 Project Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.

15 Project Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance the capacity of the Airport by providing an aircraft parking apron of sufficient strength for the size and weight of commercial aircraft now utilizing the Airport. It will also enhance capacity by ensuring that the aircraft parking apron is in proper condition for aircraft operations and to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139, Certification of Airports. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: The existing apron was concrete pavement over 60 years old of varying thickness ranging from 4 to 10 inches, and lacked adequate load transfer between slabs. The structural capacity and fatigue life of the pavement had been reached and exceeded with the addition of the new commercial service operating A319s. Corner cracks, slab shattering, spalls and transverse cracking were present and deterioration was accelerating. The pavement was generating a significant amount of foreign object debris. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition

16 Project Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2008 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): July 2009 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes

17 Project Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding:

18 Project Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

19

20

21 Project Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $2,927 (Local match AIP # ) Pay-as-you-go $1,791 (Local match AIP # ) Pay-as-you-go $3,176 (Local match AIP # ) Pay-as-you-go $13,158 (Local match AIP # ) Pay-as-you-go $13,158 (Local match AIP # ) Pay-as-you-go $6,971 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $41,181 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $111, $68, $120, $500, $500, $264,877

22 Project Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $1,564,877 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $41,181 Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $41,181 Total Project Cost: $1,647,239 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates.

23 Project Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of improvements to Runway 04 and associated taxiways. The specific project elements included the following: the construction of new taxiway Hotel from Taxiway Delta to the Runway 04 threshold; the remarking of Runway to Runway 04-22; lighting and signage upgrades consistent with the new taxiway and runway renaming; and the construction of fillets on the connectors from Taxiway Delta to the Terminal Apron. The new taxiway Hotel constructed in this project was approximately 150 feet wide and 500 feet in length constructed of 7 of asphalt. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters:

24 Project Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ]

25 Project Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance safety at the Airport by reducing the potential for aircraft collision at the intersection of Runways 04 and 33. It will also enhance safety by reducing the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors and to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139, Certification of Airports. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project was necessary to address recommendations from the Airport s Part 139 inspection after the restoration of scheduled air carrier service at the airport. The improvements enhanced safety by reducing the potential for aircraft collision in the immediate runway environment at the intersection of Runway 03 (renamed Runway 04) and Runway 33. The construction of the new Taxiway Hotel provided aircraft a means of taxiing to Runway 04 without the need to taxi on Runway 33 to access

26 Project Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension Runway 04. The project also reduced the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors between Taxiway Delta and the air carrier terminal apron. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): October 2007

27 Project Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2007 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A

28 Project Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by:

29 Project Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

30 Project 1.02 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension After Before

31 Project Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $83,533 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $83,533 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $2,390,250 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $2,390,250 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $42,280

32 Project Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $42,280 Total Project Cost: $2,516,063 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

33 Project Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and rehabilitation of Taxiways A and C as well as the widening of those taxiways. The taxiways were 40 wide and were widened to 60 wide in order to accommodate Group III aircraft. The existing pavement was milled and overlaid. The new pavement was constructed with 4 of asphalt. The project also included the relocation of the taxiway edge lights. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE

34 Project Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?

35 Project Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance the capacity of the Airport by providing taxiway access to and from Runway 04/22 of sufficient strength for the size and weight of commercial aircraft now utilizing the Airport. It will also enhance safety by eliminating the need of commercial service aircraft to back taxi on the runway. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: The rehabilitation of the pavement was necessary to preserve and extend the structural and function lives of these pavements. The widening was necessary in order to meet the geometric standards necessary for the aircraft utilizing the taxiways. Prior to the widening of the pavements, commercial aircraft were required to back taxi on the primary Runway FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.

36 Project Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): March 2009 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): February 2010 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain.

37 Project Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis.

38 Project Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

39

40 Project Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $28,163 (Local match AIP # ) Pay-as-you-go $26,249 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $54,412 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $535, $472,478 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $1,007,579 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0

41 Project Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment State Grants $26,248 Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $26,248 Total Project Cost: $1,088,239 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis

42 Project Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project consists of the purchase of two pieces of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Equipment necessary to satisfy the Airport s ARFF Index C requirements. Both units are E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF trucks. The trucks are equipped with 1,500-gallon water tanks and s 205-gallon foam tanks. The trucks are powered by a 665hp diesel engine. The first piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF71, a 2007 E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 4ENGAAA The second piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF72 a 2014 E-One Titan 4X4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 2EN9AAA8XE If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates.

43 Project Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules.

44 Project Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance safety by ensuring that the Airport has the equipment necessary for the proper level of aircraft rescue and fire fighting based on the size of aircraft utilizing the Airport. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: These purchases were made in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory Circular 150/ , Guide Specification for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicles. These ARFF trucks were necessary for the Airport to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition

45 Project Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): January 2008 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): March 2015 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes

46 Project Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding:

47 Project Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

48 Project Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $4,540 (Local match AIP # ) Pay-as-you-go $51,500 (100% of third lift device) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $56,040 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $86,260 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $86,260 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds:

49 Project Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $142,300 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

50 Project Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project consists of the purchase of three passenger ADA lifts sized to accommodate MD-80 and 737 sized aircraft. The lifts meet the 19 degree requirements of Advisory Circulars 150/ and 150/ B. They also meet the FAA required 90mph wind standards when stowed. The lifts are used by all air carriers and are adjustable to accommodate multiple sized aircraft. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE

51 Project Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?

52 Project Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance capacity by providing a means of passenger enplaning and deplaning which is safe and efficient. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: These lifts were necessary to satisfy ADA requirements given the larger passenger commercial aircraft now utilizing the airport. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.

53 Project Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2010 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2016 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use

54 Project Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.)

55 Project Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

56 Project Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $3,304 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $3,304 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $62,769 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $62,769 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $

57 Project Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $66,073 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

58 Project Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project included the work required to convert Taxiway Hotel (constructed as part of PFC Project above) from taxiway pavement to runway pavement. This work included the associated modifications necessary to the pavement markings, edge lights and airfield signage. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.

59 Project Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport.

60 Project Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity and safety at the Airport by providing additional runway takeoff and landing distances for aircraft utilizing Runway 04/22. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project allowed for the extension of the landing and takeoff surfaces of Runway 04/22 after completion of the environmental requirements for such a runway extension. Conversion of this lead-in taxiway to active runway pavement increased the total length of Runway 04/22 to 7,195 feet. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or

61 Project Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2010 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2010 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No

62 Project Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects.

63 Project Convert Taxiway H to Runway 04 Extension If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

64 Project 1.06 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension After Before

65 Project Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $1,545 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $1,545 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $29,355 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $29,355 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $

66 Project Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $30,900 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

67 Project Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project included the placement of surface painted holding position signs at the entrance to any runway from a taxiway. This included twelve locations across the airfield. The markings were done in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5340-1J, Standards for Airport Markings. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.

68 Project Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport.

69 Project Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 10. Project Objective: This project will enhance safety by ensuring that the pavement markings at runway intersections meet standards for warning pilots of the runway intersection. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project was necessary in order for the Airport to satisfy the requirements under 14 CFR 139. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or

70 Project Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2010 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2010 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No

71 Project Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects.

72 Project Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

73

74 Project Expand Terminal Building PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Expand Terminal Building 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: $819,158 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $819,158 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $590, $6,457,631 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $7,048,558 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ 2017 $686,424 $686,424 Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $686,424

75 Project Expand Terminal Building Other Funds: State Grants $1,095,793 Local Funds $460,577 Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $1,556,370 Total Project Cost: $10,110,510 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis

76 Project Expand Terminal Building PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project included the design and construction of an expansion to the Airport s passenger terminal building and reconfiguration of the existing structure. The project included a reconfiguration of the existing structure of 16,082 square feet and new construction of the expansion that provided an additional 38,647 square feet. The project followed Advisory Circular 150/5360-9, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at Non-hub Airports, Advisory Circular 150/ , Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities, as well as ACRP, IATA and TSA guidelines, and current design conventions to design the terminal to accommodate a 610 peak hour passenger demand. Included in this project is the installation and reconfiguration of the inbound and outbound baggage systems. The inbound system included a relocation and rehabilitation of the existing flat plate baggage carousel to its new location in the terminal building. A new second flat plate baggage carousel was installed. These inbound baggage carousels are 137 linear feet. The outbound baggage system included a temporary outbound conveyor system followed by the permanent outbound conveyor system which included ticket counter conveyors, general transport and make-up flat plate carousel. These systems included the necessary motors, wiring, control panels and security doors. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: 4 Number of gates: 2 Number of baggage facilities: 1 At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: 20 Number of gates: 6 Number of baggage facilities: 2

77 Project Expand Terminal Building Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: +16 Number of gates: +4 Number of baggage facilities: +1 Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] YES [ ] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ]

78 Project Expand Terminal Building LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity at the Airport by providing expanded space for all terminal functions including ticketing areas, passenger screening functions and passenger hold room areas as demanded by the significant increase in passenger volume at the Airport. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: The existing terminal structure was constructed in September 2007 after the previous terminal was destroyed in 2004 by Hurricane Charley. The terminal was sized based on commercial air service at the time which was a single service carrier with six daily flights to only two destinations. Two additional carriers have added service and the terminal could no longer support the current and anticipated future

79 Project Expand Terminal Building needs of the proposed growth. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports ; Airport records for 2015): Calendar Year Total Enplanements , , , , , , , , ,017 FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study:

80 Project Expand Terminal Building [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): November 2014 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): March 2016 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding.

81 Project Expand Terminal Building b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve.

82 Project Expand Terminal Building [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

83

84 Phase 1 and 2 New Construction Use Room # SF Passenger Screening Private Screening 117A 54 Leo 117B 64 Hold Room Circulation Hold Rooms 121A 7489 Concession Shell Only TSA TSA 123A 120 TSA 123B 115 Circulation Corridor TSA Storage Rest Room Vestibule Storage Janitorial Rest Room Vestibule Rest Room IT (Airline) Rest Room Vestibule Rest Room Storage Janitorial Rest Room Baggage Office Baggage Office Baggage Office In bound Baggage Handling Baggage Claim Circulation Corridor Subtotal Phase 1& Prorate PFC Eligible Non PFC Eligible Total $ 911, $ 911, $ 8, $ 8, $ 10, $ 10, $ 789, $ 789, $ 1,235, $ 1,235, $ 77, $ 77, $ 125, $ 125, $ 19, $ 19, $ 18, $ 18, $ 410, $ 410, $ 6, $ 6, $ 70, $ 70, $ 10, $ 10, $ 26, $ 26, $ 9, $ 9, $ 12, $ 12, $ 10, $ 10, $ 85, $ 85, $ 11, $ 11, $ 43, $ 43, $ 13, $ 13, $ 43, $ 43, $ 24, $ 24, $ 10, $ 10, $ 10, $ 10, $ 15, $ 15, $ 15, $ 15, $ 15, $ 15, $ 292, $ 292, $ 1,460, $ 1,460, $ 153, $ 153, $ 5,631, $ 318, $ 5,949, Mechancial & Electrical to Prorate IT 117C 32 Electrical 121B 57 Mechanical IT 134A 103 Electrical Electrical 135A 57 IT Mechanical Subtotal Mechanical & Electrical 1554 Total Phases 1& $ 5, $ 5, $ 8, $ 8, $ 58, $ 58, $ 15, $ 15, $ 27, $ 27, $ 8, $ 8, $ 3, $ 3, $ 111, $ 111, $ 239, $ 226, $ 12, $ 239, $ 5,857, $ 331, $ 6,188, % 5.35% % Phase 3 and 4 Reconfigure Existing Space Use Room # SF Ticketing Lobby Ticketing Circulation 101B 2800 Ticketing Airline 101A 1353 Equipment Storage Storage TSA Bag Screening Unfinished Offices Janitorial Janitorial Circulation Circulation Rest Room Rest Room Waiting Room 121A 552 Sub Total Phase 3& PFC Eligible Non PFC Eligible Total $ 391, $ 391, $ 250, $ 250, $ 148, $ 148, $ $ $ 12, $ 12, $ 17, $ 17, $ 97, $ 97, $ 231, $ 231, $ 5, $ 5, $ $ $ 8, $ 8, $ 4, $ 4, $ 32, $ 32, $ 34, $ 34, $ 49, $ 49, $ 870, $ 415, $ 1,285, Mechancial & Electrical to Prorate Mechanical Electrical IT 105A 34 IT Subtotal Mechanical & Electrical 611 Total Phases 3&4 $1,288, $ $ $ $ $ 3, $ $ $ $ 3, $ 2, $ 1, $ 3, $ 872, $ 416, $ 1,288, % 32.30% % Overall Eligibility Calculation For Design & Construction Phase Services PFC Eligible Total PFC Eligible % PHASE 1 & 2 $ 5,857, $ 6,188, % PHASE 3 & 4 $ 872, $ 1,288, % ALLOWANCE $ $ 100, % HOLD ROOM CO 1 $ 221, $ 221, % AVG. ELIGIBILITY $ 6,951, $ 7,799, %

85 Charlotte County Airport Authority Punta Gorda Airport PFC Project Terminal Expansion PFC Total PFC Not Grant Work Eligibility % Cost Eligible PFC Eligible Design (AIP 32 funding) Terminal Design 89.13% 853, ,315 92,726 Subtotals 853, ,315 92,726 Construction (AIP 33 funding) Construction Phases 1 & % 6,188,785 5,857, ,100 Construction Phases 3 & % 1,288, , ,280 Allowance 0.00% 100, ,000 Hold Room (Change Order 2) % 221, ,936 Construction Fee 89.13% 322, ,999 35,001 Construction Phase Services 89.13% 188, ,953 20,483 Construction / Grant Admin 89.13% 182, ,954 19,873 IFE Construction Phase Services 89.13% 2,000 1, Subtotals 8,494,776 7,571, ,955 Baggage Belts Future AIP Grant Baggage Belts % 762, ,693 TOTAL PROJECT 10,110,510 9,094,830 1,015,680 Funding Sources: AIP , ,927 AIP 33 6,457,631 6,457,631 AIP Future 686, ,424 State AIP 32 scope of work 39,085 32,829 6,256 State AIP 33 scope of work 1,018, , ,847 State AIP Future match 38,135 38,135 Local Funds 460, ,577 Subtotal 9,291,352 8,275,672 1,015,680 Balance PFC Eligible Costs 819, ,158 Total Funding 10,110,510 9,094,830 1,015,680

86

87 Project Reconfigure Access Road PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Reconfigure Access Road 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $23,186 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $23,186 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $417,362 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $417,362 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $23,187

88 Project Reconfigure Access Road Local Funds $79,724 Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $102,911 Total Project Cost: $543,459 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

89 Project Reconfigure Access Road 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project included the design and construction of modifications to the terminal building access road. The work included the demolition of existing asphalt pavements, construction of new asphalt pavements with compacted subgrade and base course, sodding, lighting, stormwater, pavement markings, and various electrical amenities. The project also included the construction of a drainage culvert. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE

90 Project Reconfigure Access Road Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?

91 Project Reconfigure Access Road If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity by improving the vehicle throughput capacity of the roadway and reducing congestion. This is necessary for the efficient movement of passengers and baggage at the curb. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This work was necessary to align the terminal access road (Viking Avenue) directly to the terminal road curbside with the terminal building. This alignment provided for safer and orderly flow of vehicle access to the passenger drop off and loading curb of the terminal building. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.

92 Project Reconfigure Access Road Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): February 2013 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): November 2013 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A

93 Project Reconfigure Access Road For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis.

94 Project Reconfigure Access Road If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

95

96 Project 1.09 Reconfigure Access Road After Before

97 Project Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $6,900 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $6,900 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $124,200 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $124,200 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds:

98 Project Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan State Grants $6,900 Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $6,900 Total Project Cost: $138,000 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

99 Project Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: The project consists of the development of a Wildlife Hazard Assessment followed by a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. The assessment includes the elements required under part (c) of the regulation. Upon completion, the FAA reviewed the WHA and determined that the certificate holder must develop and implement a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) designated to mitigate wildlife hazards to aviation on or near the airport utilizing the WHA as the scientific basis. The Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, includes all of the elements required in part (f) of the regulation. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates.

100 Project Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.

101 Project Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: The objective of this project is to enhance safety at the Airport by identifying and assessing wildlife hazards at the airport and developing a plan to manage those hazards. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: 14 CFR , Wildlife hazard management, of Part 139 Certification of Airports regulations require the County, as the holder of an Airport Operating Certificate, to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA). FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.

102 Project Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): November 2012 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): March 2016 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain.

103 Project Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis.

104 Project Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

105 Project Construct a Portion of Taxiway A PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $136,662 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $136,662 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $2,459,913 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $2,459,913 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $136,662

106 Project Construct a Portion of Taxiway A Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $136,662 Total Project Cost: $2,733,237 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

107 Project Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of additional Taxiway A in between Taxiway C and Runway 15/33. This includes approximately 1,924 linear feet of 60 wide asphalt taxiway pavement. This also includes the associated site preparation and taxiway edge lighting. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.

108 Project Construct a Portion of Taxiway A If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport.

109 Project Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity by eliminating a bottleneck at Taxiways C and D and will allow air traffic control to clear aircraft from the runway more quickly. The project will reduce travel distance between the terminal and Runway 22, increasing the efficient of aircraft ground movements. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project is necessary to increase safety and alleviate congestion of taxiing aircraft in the airfield. Runway is the primary runway and the only runway utilized by the commercial passenger air carriers. When Runway 22 is in use, a bottleneck occurs on Taxiway C and Taxiway D of aircraft exiting Runway and aircraft taxiing to Runway 22 to depart. This congestion leads to delays in taxiing and even pushing back from the gate. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.

110 Project Construct a Portion of Taxiway A Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): December 2015 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): August 2016 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A

111 Project Construct a Portion of Taxiway A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis.

112 Project Construct a Portion of Taxiway A If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

113

114 Project Update Airport Master Plan Study PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Update Airport Master Plan Study 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $54,388 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $54,388 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $978,791 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $978,791 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $54,387

115 Project Update Airport Master Plan Study Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $54,387 Total Project Cost: $1,087,746 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

116 Project Update Airport Master Plan Study 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project consists of a Master Plan Study update. The Master Plan is a comprehensive study of the Airport including short, medium and long term airport development plans to meet future aviation demand. The Master Plan project will follow FAA guidance provided in Advisory Circular , Airport Master Plans incorporating those elements necessary based on the specific needs and assets at the Airport. The Master Plan will show all existing and planned development on an updated ALP to illustrate proposed improvements to the Airport. New forecasts of aviation demand, evaluation of alternatives, and a long term capital improvement plan will be prepared to meet the Airport s long term aeronautical needs in a financially feasible manner. The Master Plan will present the research and logic from which the plan evolved and displays the plan on graphic and written format. This project will include the new Master Plan requirements for Geographic Information System (GIS) data and an e-alp as well as plans for recycling or minimizing the generation of airport solid waste. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities:

117 Project Update Airport Master Plan Study Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules.

118 Project Update Airport Master Plan Study Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: The objective of this project is to enhance capacity by ensuring that the long term development of the airport is appropriate based on current and forecasted aviation demand and undertaken in accordance with applicable standards. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: The Airport s last Master Plan was completed in 2008, since which the Airport has experienced above average growth in passenger enplanements. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports ; Airport records for 2015): Calendar Year Total Enplanements , , , ,041

119 Project Update Airport Master Plan Study , , , , ,017 FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs.

120 Project Update Airport Master Plan Study 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2016 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): May 2018 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates.

121 Project Update Airport Master Plan Study [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by:

122 Project Update Airport Master Plan Study Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

123 Project Conduct Environmental Assessment PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Conduct Environmental Assessment 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $18,070 (Local match AIP # ) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $18,070 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ $325,255 Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $325,255 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $18,069

124 Project Conduct Environmental Assessment Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $18,069 Total Project Cost: $361,394 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

125 Project Conduct Environmental Assessment 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate potential social, environmental, and economic consequences of implementing the 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at PGD, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The EA will focus on projects likely to be included in the 5-year CIP, including, but not limited to: General Aviation Apron and Facilities Construction, Fixed Base Operator and Maintenance Facilities Construction, Perimeter Road Construction, and Airfield Pavement Overlay and Rehabilitation. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A

126 Project Conduct Environmental Assessment FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?

127 Project Conduct Environmental Assessment If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity at the Airport by ensuring that projects identified for near-term construction have received the appropriate environmental review and approval prior to execution of those projects. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Those projects included in the 5-year CIP are likely to be identified for near-term construction based on current planning at PGD. The forthcoming Master Plan Update will affirm and verify these recommendations, and provide conceptual design and planning data necessary to complete the EA. The EA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of FAA Orders F and B and will include conceptual design sufficient to receive FAA environmental approval of the proposed projects. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application.

128 Project Conduct Environmental Assessment If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): September 2016 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): May 2018 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No

129 Project Conduct Environmental Assessment Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use

130 Project Conduct Environmental Assessment Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

131 Project Extend Terminal Apron to the North PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Extend Terminal Apron to the North 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $131,125 (Local match future AIP grant) Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $131,125 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ 2017 $2,360,250 $0 $2,360,250 Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $2,360,250 Other Funds: State Grants $131,125

132 Project Extend Terminal Apron to the North Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $131,125 Total Project Cost: $2,622,500 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

133 Project Extend Terminal Apron to the North 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the extension of the terminal aircraft parking apron to the north. It includes approximately 9,653 square yards of portland cement concrete pavement and 3,191 square yards of asphalt pavement. This apron extension will provide for two additional aircraft parking positions. This project will be designed to ADG-III standards. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE

134 Project Extend Terminal Apron to the North Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?

135 Project Extend Terminal Apron to the North If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances capacity by providing for additional aircraft parking positions at the terminal. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Due to the rapid growth of commercial passenger service at PGD, it is necessary to expand the area used by commercial aviation. PGD currently has 7 parking positions for MD-80 / A-320 type aircraft. PGD regularly has as many as 9 aircraft on the ground. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.

136 Project Extend Terminal Apron to the North Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): March 2017 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): September 2017 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A

137 Project Extend Terminal Apron to the North For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.)

138 Project Extend Terminal Apron to the North ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

139 100' R TW "F" 60' R 93' 155' 0 80' TW "D" 22' MIN. CLEARANCE A ' MIN. CLEARANCE 46' A ' 25' 22' MIN. CLEARANCE TOFA BLAST FENCE LEGEND CONCRETE PAVEMENT (9653 SY) ASPHALT PAVEMENT (3191 SY) BLAST FENCE

140 Project 1.14 Extend Terminal Apron to the North

141 Project Construct Air Traffic Control Tower PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Construct Air Traffic Control Tower 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $832,028 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $832,028 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $3,328,100 Local Funds $

142 Project Construct Air Traffic Control Tower Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $3,328,100 Total Project Cost: $4,160,128 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A

143 Project Construct Air Traffic Control Tower If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for the Punta Gorda Airport. The new tower is approximately 122 feet high and provides for two controller positions. The shaft was construction of precast concrete slabs and the cab was of steel frame construction. The project includes an other transaction agreement between the FAA and the Airport to provide the labor and materials required to establish the Operator Input Device (OID), establish NAVAIDS controls, and establish FAA communication lines to the new ATCT. The tower is included in the FAA Contract Tower (FCT) Program. The tower was designed in accordance with FCT Program standards. The location of the tower was determined based on a July 2009 Siting Report using the current version of FAA Order , Air Traffic Control Tower Siting Process. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates.

144 Project Construct Air Traffic Control Tower [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding.

145 Project Construct Air Traffic Control Tower How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances safety and capacity by providing positive control of commercial and general aviation aircraft operating at the Airport. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Prior to the construction of this ATCT, Punta Gorda was a non-towered airport meaning pilots follow recommended procedures for arriving and departing the airport and communicate on a common traffic advisory frequency. Approach and departure control was available from Ft. Myers TRACON and Miami Center. The construction of an air traffic control tower was the principal recommendation of the Airport s Master Plan update completed in March At the time of the start of construction, the airport was accommodating almost 90,000 operations per year and supported more than 270 based aircraft. The Airport was home to 10 commercial aviation businesses providing services including charter, sales, maintenance and flight instruction. Public safety and emergency operators were also based at and used the airport for life-saving missions. Two commercial service airlines were operating at the Airport. The dynamic fleet mix ranged from single engine Cessna 152 s to Airbus 319 s. With the increased number of operations at the Airport and the mix of aircraft sizes and speeds, an ATCT was determined necessary to ensure safe operations at the airport. FOR FAA USE

146 Project Construct Air Traffic Control Tower Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): March 2010 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): February 2012 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes

147 Project Construct Air Traffic Control Tower [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding:

148 Project Construct Air Traffic Control Tower 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

149

150

151

152

153 Project 1.15 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower

154 Project Install Instrument Landing System PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Install Instrument Landing System 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $297,791 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $297,791 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $1,691,163 Local Funds $

155 Project Install Instrument Landing System Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $1,691,193 Total Project Cost: $1,988,954 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A

156 Project Install Instrument Landing System If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of an Instrument Landing System (ILS) for Runway 04 at the Airport. The system includes the localizer, glideslope and distance measuring equipment (DME). The project includes the site preparation, installation of electrical and telecommunication infrastructure, construction of the foundations, construction of the service road and shelter area, and installation of the ILS equipment. The project also includes the flight check of the ILS. This is a Cat-I ILS. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE

157 Project Install Instrument Landing System Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?

158 Project Install Instrument Landing System If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances safety by providing aircraft with the technology to arrive and depart from Runway 04 during periods of inclement weather when the Airport can not be located based on visual observation alone. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Given the increase in aircraft operations, specifically of commercial passenger aircraft, the installation of an ILS was determined necessary to allow aircraft to land at the airport during periods of inclement weather. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.

159 Project Install Instrument Landing System Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): May 2015 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): September 2015 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A

160 Project Install Instrument Landing System For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.)

161 Project Install Instrument Landing System ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

162 November 9, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration. Airport District Office Hazetime National Dr. Suite 400 Orlando FL To whom it may concern, Since its inaugural flight at Punta Gorda airport (KPGD), Allegiant Air has been continually expanding its operation in this market. Today, KPGD is a pilot domicile from which we operate a fleet of MD-80 and Airbus A320 aircraft to markets throughout the eastern half of the continental United States. Three years ago, prior to implementation of the Airbus fleet, Allegiant Air operated only the MD- 80 at KPGD. A limitation of the MD-80 is the lack of a navigation capability to perform RNAV instrument approach procedures. Allegiant Air s Flight Safety department identified the benefit of installing a precision approach at KPGD, and began a dialogue with the Charlotte County Airport Authority to explore possibilities for installing an ILS on the airfield. Thanks to the Charlotte County Airport Authority, the availability of the ILS to runway 4 has virtually eliminated the number of weather diversions and associated operational disruptions that occurred prior to its commissioning. Even with the transition to the Airbus fleet, the ILS provides an important weather capability, since Allegiant Air s operations specifications only authorize operation of the Airbus to RNAV LNAV weather minima which are higher than that provided by the ILS to runway 4. We encourage the FAA to continue to support the ILS at KPGD. Recognizing the outstanding and award-winning efforts of the Charlotte County Airport Authority, we also encourage the FAA to support their continued efforts on airport improvements. Regards, Brian Heinitz Manager, Flight Safety Allegiant Air

163 Project PFC Application Costs PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: PFC Application Costs 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $58,910 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $58,910 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $ Local Funds $

164 Project PFC Application Costs Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $58,910 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A

165 Project PFC Application Costs If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: PFC-eligible general formation costs included in this PFC project are the necessary expenditures to prepare the new PFC application. Development associated with the approved projects in this application will enhance capacity at the Airport. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.

166 Project PFC Application Costs If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective:

167 Project PFC Application Costs Development resulting from this PFC application will preserve and enhance capacity and safety at the Airport. The funding provided for in this PFC application will fund the projects needed to preserve and enhance capacity and safety. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project is necessary to develop the PFC program. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or

168 Project PFC Application Costs PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): June 2016 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): July 2022 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No

169 Project PFC Application Costs Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects.

170 Project PFC Application Costs If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

171 Project Mitigate Wetlands PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Mitigate Wetlands 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [X] Impose Only: [ ] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $250,000 (Local match Future AIP grant) Pay-as-you-go $2,500,000 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $2,750,000 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ 2018 $2,250,000 $0 $2,250,000 Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $2,250,000 Other Funds:

172 Project Mitigate Wetlands State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $5,000,000 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis

173 Project Mitigate Wetlands 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: This project includes the design and construction necessary to mitigate approximately 37 acres of wetlands located within the airfield operating environment, identified as Areas B, G, L and F. The project will include backfilling, regrading, installation of pipes or culverts and associated work necessary to eliminate or relocate the wetlands in the airfield environment. These wetlands have been prioritized based on their impact to aviation. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A

174 Project Mitigate Wetlands FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application. If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency?

175 Project Mitigate Wetlands If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective: This project enhances safety at the Airport by mitigating wildlife attractants which could pose a threat to aircraft arriving to and departing from the Airport. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: Wetlands have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public-use airports. This wetland mitigation was recommended by the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan updated March 10, This project will follow Advisory Circular 150/ B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above.

176 Project Mitigate Wetlands Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): March 2018 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): December 2020 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): December 2018

177 Project Mitigate Wetlands For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.)

178 Project Mitigate Wetlands ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects. If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

179 Legend Airport Property Line SIDA (No Access) Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Wetland Airfield Pavement / Feet 0 1,200 Sources: - URS Inc., 2013 PUNTA GORDA AIRPORT Wildlife Hazard Assessment Path: I:\Misc_Jobs\Cartwright\Punta Gorda Airport\Wildlife Hazard Assessment 2012\applications\mxd\figures\Figure 3 - Airport Features.mxd, Date Saved: 4/14/2014 9:35:49 AM Aerial Image Feb Mar 2011: 2010 DigitalGlobe Image courtesy of USGS Earthstar Geographics AIRPORT FEATURES FIGURE 3

180 Project PFC Administration Costs PFC APPLICATION NUMBER: C-00-PGD ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: PFC Administration Costs 2. Project Number: Use Airport of Project: Punta Gorda Airport 4. Project Type [ ] Impose Only: [X] Concurrent: [ ] Use Only: Link to application: 5. Level of Collection: [ ] $1.00 [X] $2.00 [ ] $3.00 [ ] $4.00 [ ] $ Financing Plan PFC Funds: Pay-as-you-go $3,590 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ Subtotal PFC Funds*: $3,590 If amount is over $10 million, include cost details sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Existing AIP Funds: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ Subtotal Existing AIP Funds: $0 Anticipated AIP Funds (List Each Year Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ Subtotal Anticipated AIP Funds: $0 Other Funds: State Grants $ Local Funds $

181 Project PFC Administration Costs Other (please specify) $ Subtotal Other Funds: $0 Total Project Cost: $3,590 For FAA Use a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? If YES, does the Region support? [ ]YES. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary funds, does the Region intend to support? c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? d. For project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: Is there an expectation that AIP funding will be available to pay the project costs. What percentage of the total project cost is funded through AIP? List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. e. Terminal and surface transportation projects requesting a PFC funding level of $4.00 and $4.50. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A List the source(s) of data used to make this finding. f. Reasonableness of cost. Project Total Cost Analysis PFC Share of Total Cost Analysis 7. Back-up Financing Plan: N/A

182 Project PFC Administration Costs If proposed AIP discretionary funds or a proposed LOI are included in the Financing Plan, provide a Back-up Financing Plan or a project phasing plan in the event the funds are not available for the project. For FAA Use If required to use a back-up financing/phasing plan, indicate the need to obtain additional approvals to obtain an alternate source of financing. Indicate the additional PFC duration of collection required if PFC s are to be used to fund the difference. Recap any discussion from previous item regarding likelihood of public agency obtaining the funding it proposes. 8. Project Description: PFC-eligible costs included in this PFC project are eligible ongoing administrative costs, amendments and closeout for this PFC application. Development associated with the approved projects in this application will enhance capacity at the Airport. If applicable for terminal projects, Prior to implementation of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: At completion of this project, Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Net change due to this project: Number of ticket counters: Number of gates: Number of baggage facilities: Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [X] N/A FOR FAA USE Comment upon and/or Clarify Project Description. Include source citation if clarification information is not from PFC application.

183 Project PFC Administration Costs If project involves the construction of a new runway or modification of an existing runway, have the requirements of Order , with regard to runway safety areas been met? If not, is the runway grandfathered or has a modification been approve, or is there a likelihood the requirements will be met, or should the project be disapproved. If the project involves terminal work, confirm information regarding ticket counters, gates, and baggage facilities for construction and/or rehabilitation above has been completed. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 9. Significant Contribution: N/A FOR FAA USE Air safety. Part 139 [ ] Other (explain) Certification Inspector concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Air security. Part 107 [ ] Part 108 [ ] Other (explain) CASFO concur. Yes [ ] No [ ] Date Competition. Competition Plan [ ] Other (explain) Congestion. Current [ ] or Anticipated [ ] LOI [ ] FAA BCA [ ] FAA Airport Capacity Enhancement Plan [ ] Other (explain) Noise. 65 LDN [ ] Other (explain) Project does not qualify under significant contribution rules. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of significant contribution option chosen by public agency. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. How does this project address the deficiency sited by the public agency? If competition is the chosen option, provide the FAA s analysis of any barriers to competition at the airport. 10. Project Objective:

184 Project PFC Administration Costs Development resulting from this PFC application will preserve and enhance capacity and safety at the Airport. The funding provided for in this PFC application will fund the projects needed to preserve and enhance capacity and safety. FOR FAA USE Safety, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Security, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Capacity, Preserve [ ] Enhance [ ] Furnish opportunity for enhanced competition between or among air carriers at the airport Mitigate noise impacts resulting from aircraft operations at the airport Project does not meet any PFC objectives (explain) Finding Current deficiency. List the source(s) of data used to make this finding if it is not a part of the PFC application. Address adequacy of issues. 11. Project Justification: This project is necessary to administer the PFC program. FOR FAA USE Define how the project accomplishes PFC Objective(s) Explain how project is cost-effective compared to other reasonable and timely means to accomplish this objective(s) Based on informed opinion or published FAA guidance, specify how the cost of the project is reasonable compared to the capacity, safety, security, noise and/or competition benefits attributable to the project. Include citation for any documents that are not a part of this PFC application. If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Discuss any non-economical benefits which are not captured above. Project Eligibility: Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ ] Development eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or

185 Project PFC Administration Costs PGL ); [ ] Planning eligible under AIP criteria (paragraph of Order _ or PGL ); [ ] Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C ; [ ] Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C [ ] Project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan; Title and Date of Part 150: [ ] Project included in a local study. Title and Date of local study: [ ] Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C (a)(3)(C); [ ] Shell of a gate as described in 49 U.S.C 40117(a)(3)(F) (air carrier, percentage of annual boardings ); [ ] PFC Program Update Letter [ ] Project does not meet PFC eligibility (explain). If analysis is based on a source other than this PFC application, list the source(s) of data and attach the relevant documentation used to make this finding. Are any work elements or portions of the overall project ineligible? Provide associated costs. 12. Estimated Project Implementation Date (Month and Year): June 2016 Estimated Project Completion Date (Month and Year): July 2022 For FAA Use For Impose and Use or Use Only projects, will the project begin within 2 years of PFC application Due date (120-day)? [ ] Yes [ ] No For Impose Only project, will the project begin within 5 years of the charge effective date or PFC application Due date, whichever is first? [ ] Yes [ ] No Is this project dependent upon another action to occur before its implementation or completion. Explain. 13. For an Impose Only project, estimated date Use application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A For FAA Use Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date or approval date, whichever is sooner. [ ] Yes [ ] No

186 Project PFC Administration Costs Which actions are needed before the use application can be submitted? What is the estimated schedule for each action? 14. Project requesting PFC funding levels of $4.00 and $4.50: N/A a. Can project costs be paid for from funds reasonably expected to be available through AIP funding. b. If the FAA determines that the project may qualify for AIP funding, would the public agency prefer that the FAA approve [ ] the amount of the local match to be collected at a $4.50 PFC level, or [ ] the entire requested amount at a $3.00 PFC level. c. Terminal and surface transportation projects. The public agency has made adequate provision for financing the airside needs of the airport, including runways, taxiways, aprons, and aircraft gates. [ ] N/A 15. List of Carriers Certifying Agreement: None List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: 16. List of Comments Received from the Public Notice: None List of Parties Certifying Agreement. Recap of Disagreements Public Agency Reasons for Proceeding: For FAA Use Provide an analysis of each issue/disagreement raised by the air carriers and/or the public. Provide citations for any documents not included in the PFC application that are relied on by the FAA for its analysis. If a Federal Register notice is published, discuss and analyze any new issues raised. (If the comments from the consultation are repeated, state that.) ADO/RO Recommendation: Does the ADO/RO find the total costs of this project to be reasonable? Did the ADO/RO use comparable projects to make this finding? If so, list projects.

187 Project PFC Administration Costs If the amount requested if over $10 million, was the level of detail sufficient to identify eligible and ineligible costs. Summarize ineligible costs. Is the duration of collection adequate for the amount requested? ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: [ ] Approve. [ ] Partially Approve. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. [ ] Disapprove. Summarize findings from earlier in the Attachment B discussing issues that lead to determination. Application Reviewed by: Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed. Name Routing Symbol Date Item(s) reviewed

188 AIR CARRIER CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC NOTICE

189 Attached is the summary of the consultation with the air carriers operating at the Airport, including: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) A list of all carriers operating at the Airport and a list of those notified A list of carriers that acknowledged receipt of the notice A copy of the information provided to the carriers before and after the consultation meeting Lists of carriers that certified agreement and disagreement with the proposed projects A summary of substantive comments by carriers contained in the certificates of disagreement with the proposed projects, and the Airport s reasons for proceeding. (also attached is a copy of the Airline Notice, the consultation meeting agenda, and the sign-in sheet)

190 (i) The carriers listed below operated at least one scheduled flight into Punta Gorda Airport or appeared on the latest official FAA publication of the Air Carrier Activity Information System as having a significant business interest and therefore were sent a PFC notice of proposed application #1 via certified mail on September 23, 2016: Allegiant Air LLC Falcon Air Express Frontier Airlines Inc. Miami Air International, Inc. (ii) (iii) Delivery confirmation (of the notice) were obtained by the Airport for all of the air carriers who received a notice. Copies of all information provided to the carriers before and after the consultation meeting including the following: Powerpoint presentation provided at the consultation meeting (iv) (v) The Airport did not receive any letters of Certification of Agreement or disagreement with the proposed application. There were no letters of disagreement received by the Airport by any Air Carrier.

191

192

193

194

195 Punta Gorda Airport (PGD) Proposed Passenger Facility Charge Application #1 Project Descriptions Impose and Use Projects Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation This project includes the design, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Terminal Complex North Apron. The project includes the demolition of the existing pavement and the construction of two pavement sections, one rigid and one flexible, of adequate strength for the aircraft utilizing the apron. The reconstructed pavement was approximately 22,253 square yards of 12 portland cement concrete pavement. This project was designed to ADG-III standards. The existing apron was concrete pavement over 60 years old of varying thickness ranging from 4 to 10 inches, and lacked adequate load transfer between slabs. The structural capacity and fatigue life of the pavement had been reached and exceeded with the addition of the new commercial service operating A319s. Corner cracks, slab shattering, spalls and transverse cracking were present and deterioration was accelerating. The pavement was generating a significant amount of foreign object debris. The start date for this project was September 2008 and was completed in July The total cost of this project was $3,035,229 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #22 and #24 in the amount of $2,883,468. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $151, Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension This project includes the design and construction of improvements to Runway 04 and associated taxiways. The specific project elements included the following: the construction of new taxiway Hotel from Taxiway Delta to the Runway 04 threshold; the remarking of Runway to Runway 04-22; lighting and signage upgrades consistent with the new taxiway and runway renaming; and the construction of fillets on the connectors from Taxiway Delta to the Terminal Apron. The new taxiway Hotel constructed in this project was approximately 150 feet wide and 500 feet in length constructed of 7 of asphalt. This project was necessary to address recommendations from the Airport s Part 139 inspection after the restoration of scheduled air carrier service at the airport. The improvements enhanced safety by reducing the potential for aircraft collision in the immediate runway environment at the intersection of Runway 03 (renamed Runway 04) and Runway 33. The construction of the new Taxiway Hotel provided aircraft a means of taxiing to Runway 04 without the need to taxi on Runway 33 to access Runway 04. The project also reduced the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors between Taxiway Delta and the air carrier terminal apron. The start date for this project was October 2007 and was completed in December The total cost of this project was $1,647,239 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #23, #25, #28,

196 #29, #30 and #31 in the amount of $1,564,877. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $41,181 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $41, Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 This project includes the design and rehabilitation of Taxiways A and C as well as the widening of those taxiways. The taxiways were 40 wide and were widened to 60 wide in order to accommodate Group III aircraft. The existing pavement was milled and overlaid. The new pavement was constructed with 4 of asphalt. The project also included the relocation of the taxiway edge lights. The rehabilitation of the pavement was necessary to preserve and extend the structural and function lives of these pavements. The widening was necessary in order to meet the geometric standards necessary for the aircraft utilizing the taxiways. Prior to the widening of the pavements, commercial aircraft were required to back taxi on the primary Runway The start date for this project was March 2009 and was completed in February The total cost of this project was $2,516,063 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #26 in the amount of $2,390,250. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $42,280 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $83, Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Equipment This project consists of the purchase of two pieces of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Equipment necessary to satisfy the Airport s ARFF Index C requirements. Both units are E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF trucks. The trucks are equipped with 1,500-gallon water tanks and s 205-gallon foam tanks. The trucks are powered by a 665hp diesel engine. The first piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF71, a 2007 E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 4ENGAAA The second piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF72 a 2014 E-One Titan 4X4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 2EN9AAA8XE These purchases were made in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory Circular 150/ , Guide Specification for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicles. These ARFF trucks were necessary for the Airport to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139. The start date for this project was January 2008 and it was completed in March The total cost of this project was $1,090,740 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #31 and #33 in the amount of $1,009,829. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $40,455 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $40,456. The funding breakdown by purchase is as follows: Unit AIP Grant # AIP Funds State Funds PFC Funds Total ARFF71 31 $535,101 $0 $28,163 $563,264 ARFF72 33 $472,478 $26,248 $26,249 $524,975 Totals $1,007,579 $26,248 $54,412 $1,088,239

197 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices This project consists of the purchase of three passenger ADA lifts sized to accommodate MD-80 and 737 sized aircraft. The lifts meet the 19 degree requirements of Advisory Circulars 150/ and 150/ B. They also meet the FAA required 90mph wind standards when stowed. The lifts are used by all air carriers and are adjustable to accommodate multiple sized aircraft. These lifts were necessary to satisfy ADA requirements given the larger passenger commercial aircraft now utilizing the airport. The start date for this project was September 2010 and is estimated to be completed in December Two of the lift devices were acquired utilizing AIP funds. The third was acquired with 100% local airport funds. The total cost of this project was $142,300 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $86,260. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $4,540 plus the cost of the third lift acquired entirely with local funds in the amount of $51,500. The total PFC amount requested is $56, Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension This project included the work required to convert Taxiway Hotel (constructed as part of PFC Project above) from taxiway pavement to runway pavement. This work included the associated modifications necessary to the pavement markings, edge lights and airfield signage. This project allowed for the extension of the landing and takeoff surfaces of Runway 04/22 after completion of the environmental requirements for such a runway extension. The start date for this project was September 2010 and it was completed in December The total cost of this project was $66,073 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $62,769. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $3, Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings This project included the placement of surface painted holding position signs at the entrance to any runway from a taxiway. This included twelve locations across the airfield. The markings were done in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5340-1J, Standards for Airport Markings. This project was necessary in order for the Airport to satisfy the requirements under 14 CFR 139. The start date for this project was September 2010 and it was completed in December The total cost of this project was $30,900 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $29,355. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $1,545.

198 Expand Terminal Building This project included the design and construction of an expansion to the Airport s passenger terminal building and rehabilitation of the existing structure. The project included a rehabilitation of the existing structure of 16,082 square feet and new construction of the expansion that provided an additional 38,647 square feet. The project followed Advisory Circular 150/5360-9, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at Non-hub Airports, Advisory Circular 150/ , Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities, as well as ACRP, IATA and TSA guidelines, and current design conventions to design the terminal to accommodate a 610 peak hour passenger demand. Included in this project is the installation and reconfiguration of the inbound and outbound baggage systems. The inbound system included a relocation and rehabilitation of the existing flat plate baggage carousel to its new location in the terminal building. A new second flat plate baggage carousel was installed. These inbound baggage carousels are 137 linear feet. The outbound baggage system included a temporary outbound conveyor system followed by the permanent outbound conveyor system which included ticket counter conveyors, general transport and make-up flat plate carousel. These systems included the necessary motors, wiring, control panels and security doors. The existing terminal structure was constructed in September 2007 after the previous terminal was destroyed in 2004 by Hurricane Charley. The terminal was sized based on commercial air service at the time which was a single service carrier with six daily flights to only two destinations. Two additional carriers have added service and the terminal could no longer support the current and anticipated future needs of the proposed growth. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports ; Airport records for 2015): Calendar Year Total Enplanements , , , , , , , , ,017 The start date for this project was November 2014 and it was completed in March The funding breakdown by grant is as follows:

199 AIP Funds PFC Funds State Funds Local Total Funds AIP Grant 32 $590,927 $32,829 $39,085 $190,200 $853,041 AIP Grant 33 $5,634,211 $313,012 $1,249,568 $936,553 $8,133,344 Baggage System $0 $606,889 $155,804 $0 $762,693 Totals $6,225,138 $952,730 $1,444,457 $1,126,753 $9,749, Reconfigure Access Road This project included the design and construction of modifications to the terminal building access road. The work included the demolition of existing asphalt pavements, construction of new asphalt pavements with compacted subgrade and base course, sodding, lighting, stormwater, pavement markings, and various electrical amenities. The project also included the construction of a drainage culvert. This work was necessary to align the terminal access road (Viking Avenue) directly to the terminal road curbside with the terminal building. This alignment provided for safer and orderly flow of vehicle access to the passenger drop off and loading curb of the terminal building. The start date for this project was February 2013 and it was completed in November The total cost of this project was $543,459 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #32 in the amount of $417,362. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $23,187. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining eligible local match of $23,187. Ineligible costs totaled $79,724 and were funded with State and Airport funds Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan The project consists of the development of a Wildlife Hazard Assessment followed by a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. 14 CFR , Wildlife hazard management, of Part 139 Certification of Airports regulations require the County, as the holder of an Airport Operating Certificate, to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA). The assessment includes the elements required under part (c) of the regulation. Upon completion, the FAA reviewed the WHA and determined that the certificate holder must develop and implement a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) designated to mitigate wildlife hazards to aviation on or near the airport utilizing the WHA as the scientific basis. The Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, includes all of the elements required in part (f) of the regulation. The start date for this project was November 2012 and it was completed in March The total cost of this project was $138,000. The FAA provided funding under AIP federal grant #32 in the amount of $124,200. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $6,900 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $6, Construct a Portion of Taxiway A This project includes the design and construction of additional Taxiway A in between Taxiway C and Runway 15/33. This includes approximately 1,924 linear feet of 60 wide asphalt taxiway

200 pavement. This also includes the associated site preparation and taxiway edge lighting. This project is necessary to increase safety and alleviate congestion of taxiing aircraft in the airfield. Runway is the primary runway and the only runway utilized by the commercial passenger air carriers. When Runway 22 is in use, a bottleneck occurs on Taxiway C and Taxiway D of aircraft exiting Runway and aircraft taxiing to Runway 22 to depart. This congestion leads to delays in taxiing and even pushing back from the gate. The start date for this project was December 2015 and is estimated to be completed in August The total cost of this project is estimated to be $2,733,237. The FAA provided funding under AIP federal grant #34 in the amount of $2,459,913. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $136,662 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $136, Update Airport Master Plan Study This project consists of a Master Plan Study update. The Master Plan is a comprehensive study of the Airport including short, medium and long term airport development plans to meet future aviation demand. The Master Plan project will follow FAA guidance provided in Advisory Circular , Airport Master Plans incorporating those elements necessary based on the specific needs and assets at the Airport. The Master Plan will show all existing and planned development on an updated ALP to illustrate proposed improvements to the Airport. New forecasts of aviation demand, evaluation of alternatives, and a long term capital improvement plan will be prepared to meet the Airport s long term aeronautical needs in a financially feasible manner. The Master Plan will present the research and logic from which the plan evolved and displays the plan on graphic and written format. This project will include the new Master Plan requirements for Geographic Information System (GIS) data and an e-alp as well as plans for recycling or minimizing the generation of airport solid waste. The Airport s last Master Plan was completed in 2008, since which the Airport has experienced above average growth in passenger enplanements. The start date for this project is estimated to be September 2016 and it is estimated to be completed in May The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,087,746 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #35 in the amount of $978,971. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $54,387 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $54, Conduct Environmental Assessment This project includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate potential social, environmental, and economic consequences of implementing the 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at PGD, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The EA will focus on projects likely to be included in the 5-year CIP, including, but not limited to: General Aviation Apron and Facilities Construction, Fixed Base Operator and Maintenance Facilities Construction, Perimeter Road Construction, and Airfield Pavement Overlay and Rehabilitation.

201 Those projects included in the 5-year CIP are likely to be identified for near-term construction based on current planning at PGD. The forthcoming Master Plan Update will affirm and verify these recommendations, and provide conceptual design and planning data necessary to complete the EA. The EA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of FAA Orders F and B and will include conceptual design sufficient to receive FAA environmental approval of the proposed projects. The start date for this project is estimated to be September 2016 and it is estimated to be completed in May The total cost of this project is estimated to be $361,394 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #35 in the amount of $325,255. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $18,069 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $18, Extend Terminal Apron to the North This project includes the extension of the terminal aircraft parking apron to the north. It includes approximately 9,653 square yards of portland cement concrete pavement and 3,191 square yards of asphalt pavement. This apron extension will provide for two additional aircraft parking positions. This project will be designed to ADG-III standards. Due to the rapid growth of commercial passenger service at PGD, it is necessary to expand the area used by commercial aviation. PGD currently has 7 parking positions for MD-80 / A-320 type aircraft. PGD regularly has as many as 9 aircraft on the ground. The start date for this project is estimated to be March 2017 and it is estimated to be completed in September The total cost of this project is estimated to be $2,622,500 with FAA funding under a future AIP federal grant in the amount of $2,360,250. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $131,125 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $131, Construct Air Traffic Control Tower This project includes the design and construction of a new Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for the Punta Gorda Airport. The new tower is approximately 122 feet high and provides for two controller positions. The shaft was construction of precast concrete slabs and the cab was of steel frame construction. The project includes an other transaction agreement between the FAA and the Airport to provide the labor and materials required to establish the Operator Input Device (OID), establish NAVAIDS controls, and establish FAA communication lines to the new ATCT. The tower is included in the FAA Contract Tower (FCT) Program. The tower was designed in accordance with FCT Program standards. The location of the tower was determined based on a July 2009 Siting Report using the current version of FAA Order , Air Traffic Control Tower Siting Process. Prior to the construction of this ATCT, Punta Gorda was a non-towered airport meaning pilots follow recommended procedures for arriving and departing the airport and communicate on a common traffic advisory frequency. With the increased number of operations at the Airport and

202 the mix of aircraft sizes and speeds, an ATCT was determined necessary to ensure safe operations at the airport. The start date for this project was March 2010 and was completed in February The total cost of this project was $4,160,128 with the State of Florida providing funds in the amount of $3,328,100 and PFC funds are being requested to fund the remaining $832, Install Instrument Landing System This project includes the design and construction of an Instrument Landing System (ILS) for Runway 04 at the Airport. The system includes the localizer, glideslope and distance measuring equipment (DME). The project includes the site preparation, installation of electrical and telecommunication infrastructure, construction of the foundations, construction of the service road and shelter area, and installation of the ILS equipment. The project also includes the flight check of the ILS. This is a Cat-I ILS. Given the increase in aircraft operations, specifically of commercial passenger aircraft, the installation of an ILS was determined necessary to allow aircraft to land at the airport during periods of inclement weather. The start date for this project was May 2015 and was completed in September The total cost of this project was $1,988,954 with the State of Florida providing funds in the amount of $1,691,163 and PFC funds are being requested to fund the remaining $297, PFC Administration Costs PFC-eligible general formation costs included in this PFC project are the necessary expenditures to prepare the new PFC application. Also included are eligible ongoing administrative costs, amendments and closeout for this PFC application. Development associated with the approved projects in this application will enhance capacity at the Airport. The total cost of this project is $62,500. PFCs are anticipated to provide 100% funding for this project. This project started in June 2016 and will be complete in July Impose Only Project Mitigate Wetlands This project includes the design and construction necessary to mitigate approximately 37 acres of wetlands located within the airfield operating environment, identified as Areas B, G, L and F. The project will include backfilling, regrading, installation of pipes or culverts and associated work necessary to eliminate or relocate the wetlands in the airfield environment. These wetlands have been prioritized based on their impact to aviation. Wetlands have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public-use airports. This wetland mitigation was recommended by the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan updated March 10, This project will follow Advisory Circular 150/ B, Hazardous Wildlife

203 Attractants on or Near Airports. The start date for this project is estimated to be March 2018 and it is estimated to be completed in December The total cost of this project is estimated to be $5,000,000 with FAA funding under a future AIP federal grant in of approximately $2,250,000. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $250,000 plus the costs in excess of available AIP funds estimated to be $2,500,000. The total PFC amount requested is $2,250,000. Alternative Projects for Impose Only Projects Alternative Project #1 Taxiway E Extension This project includes the extension of Taxiway E of approximately 1,700 of asphalt pavement to provide a full length parallel taxiway for Runway 09/27. This would include the relocation of the existing Taxiway E to meet the ADG-III standards. The project also includes the construction of drainage structures, pavement markings and airfield lighting. The estimated cost for this project is $2,550,000. Alternative Project #2 Apron Expansion to the North of Runway 09/27 This project includes the construction of additional aircraft parking apron north of Runway 09/27. The construction of aprons and taxilanes will be of asphalt pavement. The additional parking apron will provide 80 aircraft parking positions. The project also includes pavement markings, apron lighting and perimeter fencing. The estimated cost for this project is $3,150,000.

204

205

206 PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE NEW PFC APPLICATION #1 AIRLINE CONSULTATION MEETING OCTOBER 25, 2016 Introductions Agenda Proposed Impose and Use and Impose Only Application #1 Projects Description Proposed Financial Plan Next Steps in the PFC Process Questions and Comments 1

207 Proposed PFC Application #1 Impose and Use Projects: 1.01 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation 1.02 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 1.03 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Equipment 1.05 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 1.06 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension 1.07 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 1.08 Expand Terminal Building 1.09 Reconfigure Access Road Proposed PFC Application #1 Impose and Use Projects: 1.10 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan 1.11 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 1.12 Update Airport Master Plan Study 1.13 Conduct Environmental Assessment 1.14 Extend Terminal Apron to the North 1.15 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower 1.16 Install Instrument Landing System 1.17 PFC Administration Costs Impose Only Project: 1.18 Mitigate Wetlands 2

208 Proposed PFC Application #1 PFC Revenue Impose $5,657,156 PFC Revenue Use $2,907,156 PFC Level $2.00 Estimated Collection Start Date July 1, 2017 Estimated Collection End Date July 1, 2022 Proposed Carrier Exemptions None Project 1.01 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation Description: This project includes the design, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Terminal Complex North Apron. The project includes the demolition of the existing pavement and the construction of two pavement sections, one rigid and one flexible, of adequate strength for the aircraft utilizing the apron. The reconstructed pavement was approximately 22,253 square yards of 12 portland cement concrete pavement. This project was designed to ADG III standards. Need: The existing apron was concrete pavement over 60 years old of varying thickness ranging from 4 to 10 inches, and lacked adequate load transfer between slabs. The structural capacity and fatigue life of the pavement had been reached and exceeded with the addition of the new commercial service operating A319s. Corner cracks, slab shattering, spalls and transverse cracking were present and deterioration was accelerating. The pavement was generating a significant amount of foreign object debris. Project Start Date: September 2008 Project Completion Date: July 2009 Total Project Cost: $3,035,229 FAA Grant: $2,883,468 PFC Funds: $151,761 3

209 Project 1.01 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation, Phase 1 Project 1.01 Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation, Phase 2 4

210 Project 1.02 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension Description: This project includes the design and construction of improvements to Runway 04 and associated taxiways. The specific project elements included the following: the construction of new taxiway Hotel from Taxiway Delta to the Runway 04 threshold; the remarking of Runway to Runway 04 22; lighting and signage upgrades consistent with the new taxiway and runway renaming; and the construction of fillets on the connectors from Taxiway Delta to the Terminal Apron. The new taxiway Hotel constructed in this project was approximately 150 feet wide and 500 feet in length constructed of 7 of asphalt. Project 1.02 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension Need: This project was necessary to address recommendations from the Airport s Part 139 inspection after the restoration of scheduled air carrier service at the airport. The improvements enhanced safety by reducing the potential for aircraft collision in the immediate runway environment at the intersection of Runway 03 (renamed Runway 04) and Runway 33. The construction of the new Taxiway Hotel provided aircraft a means of taxiing to Runway 04 without the need to taxi on Runway 33 to access Runway 04. The project also reduced the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors between Taxiway Delta and the air carrier terminal apron. Project Start Date: October 2007 Project Completion Date: December 2007 Total Project Cost: $1,647,239 FAA Grant: $1,564,877 State Grant: $41,181 PFC Funds: $41,181 5

211 Project 1.02 Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension After Before Project 1.03 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 Description: This project includes the design and rehabilitation of Taxiways A and C as well as the widening of those taxiways. The taxiways were 40 wide and were widened to 60 wide in order to accommodate Group III aircraft. The existing pavement was milled and overlaid. The new pavement was constructed with 4 of asphalt. The project also included the relocation of the taxiway edge lights. Need: The rehabilitation of the pavement was necessary to preserve and extend the structural and function lives of these pavements. The widening was necessary in order to meet the geometric standards necessary for the aircraft utilizing the taxiways. Prior to the widening of the pavements, commercial aircraft were required to back taxi on the primary Runway Project Start Date: March 2009 Project Completion Date: February 2010 Total Project Cost: $2,516,063 FAA Grant: $2,390,250 State Grant: $42,280 PFC Funds: $83,533 6

212 Project 1.03 Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 Project 1.04 Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Equipment Description: This project consists of the purchase of two pieces of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Equipment necessary to satisfy the Airport s ARFF Index C requirements. Both units are E One Titan 4x4 ARFF trucks. The trucks are equipped with 1,500 gallon water tanks and s 205 gallon foam tanks. The trucks are powered by a 665hp diesel engine. The first piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF71, a 2007 E One Titan 4x4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 4ENGAAA The second piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF72 a 2014 E One Titan 4X4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 2EN9AAA8XE Need: These purchases were made in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory Circular 150/ , Guide Specification for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicles. These ARFF trucks were necessary for the Airport to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139. Project Start Date: January 2008 Project Completion Date: March 2015 Total Project Cost: $1,088,239 FAA Grant: $1,007,579 State Grant: $26,248 PFC Funds: $54,412 7

213 Project 1.05 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices Description: This project consists of the purchase of three passenger ADA lifts sized to accommodate MD 80 and 737 sized aircraft. The lifts meet the 19 degree requirements of Advisory Circulars 150/ and 150/ B. They also meet the FAA required 90mph wind standards when stowed. The lifts are used by all air carriers and are adjustable to accommodate multiple sized aircraft. Need: These lifts were necessary to satisfy ADA requirements given the larger passenger commercial aircraft now utilizing the airport. Project Start Date: September 2010 Project Completion Date: December 2016 Total Project Cost: $142,300 FAA Grant: $86,260 PFC Funds: $56,040 Project 1.05 Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 8

214 Project 1.06 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension Description: This project included the work required to convert Taxiway Hotel (constructed as part of PFC Project above) from taxiway pavement to runway pavement. This work included the associated modifications necessary to the pavement markings, edge lights and airfield signage. Need: This project allowed for the extension of the landing and takeoff surfaces of Runway 04/22 after completion of the environmental requirements for such a runway extension. Project Start Date: September 2010 Project Completion Date: December 2010 Total Project Cost: $66,073 FAA Grant: $62,769 PFC Funds: $3,304 Project 1.06 Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension After Before 9

215 Project 1.07 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings Description: This project included the placement of surface painted holding position signs at the entrance to any runway from a taxiway. This included twelve locations across the airfield. The markings were done in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5340 1J, Standards for Airport Markings. Need: This project was necessary in order for the Airport to satisfy the requirements under 14 CFR 139. Project Start Date: September 2010 Project Completion Date: December 2010 Total Project Cost: $30,900 FAA Grant: $29,355 PFC Funds: $1,545 Project 1.07 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 10

216 Project 1.08 Expand Terminal Building Description: This project included the design and construction of an expansion to the Airport s passenger terminal building and rehabilitation of the existing structure. The project included a rehabilitation of the existing structure of 16,082 square feet and new construction of the expansion that provided an additional 38,647 square feet. The project followed Advisory Circular 150/5360 9, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at Non hub Airports, Advisory Circular 150/ , Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities, as well as ACRP, IATA and TSA guidelines, and current design conventions to design the terminal to accommodate a 610 peak hour passenger demand. Included in this project is the installation and reconfiguration of the inbound and outbound baggage systems. The inbound system included a relocation and rehabilitation of the existing flat plate baggage carousel to its new location in the terminal building. A new second flat plate baggage carousel was installed. These inbound baggage carousels are 137 linear feet. The outbound baggage system included a temporary outbound conveyor system followed by the permanent outbound conveyor system which included ticket counter conveyors, general transport and make up flat plate carousel. These systems included the necessary motors, wiring, control panels and security doors. Project 1.08 Expand Terminal Building Need: The existing terminal structure was constructed in September 2007 after the previous terminal was destroyed in 2004 by Hurricane Charley. The terminal was sized based on commercial air service at the time which was a single service carrier with six daily flights to only two destinations. Two additional carriers have added service and the terminal could no longer support the current and anticipated future needs of the proposed growth. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports ; Airport records for 2015): Project Start Date: November 2014 Project Completion Date: March 2016 Total Project Cost: $9,749,978 FAA Grant: $6,225,138 State Grant: $1,444,457 PFC Funds: $952,730 Local Funds: $1,126,753 Calendar Year Total Enplanements , , , , , , , , ,017 11

217 Project 1.08 Expand Terminal Building Project 1.09 Reconfigure Access Road Description: This project included the design and construction of modifications to the terminal building access road. The work included the demolition of existing asphalt pavements, construction of new asphalt pavements with compacted subgrade and base course, sodding, lighting, stormwater, pavement markings, and various electrical amenities. The project also included the construction of a drainage culvert. Need: This work was necessary to align the terminal access road (Viking Avenue) directly to the terminal road curbside with the terminal building. This alignment provided for safer and orderly flow of vehicle access to the passenger drop off and loading curb of the terminal building. Project Start Date: February 2013 Project Completion Date: November 2013 Total Project Cost: $543,459 FAA Grant: $417,362 State Grant: $23,187 PFC Funds: $23,187 12

218 Project 1.09 Reconfigure Access Road Project 1.09 Reconfigure Access Road After Before 13

219 Project 1.10 Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan Description: The project consists of the development of a Wildlife Hazard Assessment followed by a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. The assessment includes the elements required under part (c) of the regulation. Upon completion, the FAA reviewed the WHA and determined that the certificate holder must develop and implement a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) designated to mitigate wildlife hazards to aviation on or near the airport utilizing the WHA as the scientific basis. The Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, includes all of the elements required in part (f) of the regulation. Need: 14 CFR , Wildlife hazard management, of Part 139 Certification of Airports regulations require the County, as the holder of an Airport Operating Certificate, to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA). Project Start Date: November 2012 Project Completion Date: March 2016 Total Project Cost: $138,000 FAA Grant: $124,200 State Grant: $6,900 PFC Funds: $6,900 Project 1.11 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A Description: This project includes the design and construction of additional Taxiway A in between Taxiway C and Runway 15/33. This includes approximately 1,924 linear feet of 60 wide asphalt taxiway pavement. This also includes the associated site preparation and taxiway edge lighting. Need: This project is necessary to increase safety and alleviate congestion of taxiing aircraft in the airfield. Runway is the primary runway and the only runway utilized by the commercial passenger air carriers. When Runway 22 is in use, a bottleneck occurs on Taxiway C and Taxiway D of aircraft exiting Runway and aircraft taxiing to Runway 22 to depart. This congestion leads to delays in taxiing and even pushing back from the gate. Project Start Date: December 2015 Project Completion Date: August 2016 Total Project Cost: $2,733,237 FAA Grant: $2,459,913 State Grant: $136,662 PFC Funds: $136,662 14

220 Project 1.11 Construct a Portion of Taxiway A Project 1.12 Update Airport Master Plan Study Description: This project consists of a Master Plan Study update. The Master Plan is a comprehensive study of the Airport including short, medium and long term airport development plans to meet future aviation demand. The Master Plan project will follow FAA guidance provided in Advisory Circular , Airport Master Plans incorporating those elements necessary based on the specific needs and assets at the Airport. The Master Plan will show all existing and planned development on an updated ALP to illustrate proposed improvements to the Airport. New forecasts of aviation demand, evaluation of alternatives, and a long term capital improvement plan will be prepared to meet the Airport s long term aeronautical needs in a financially feasible manner. The Master Plan will present the research and logic from which the plan evolved and displays the plan on graphic and written format. This project will include the new Master Plan requirements for Geographic Information System (GIS) data and an e ALP as well as plans for recycling or minimizing the generation of airport solid waste. 15

221 Project 1.12 Update Airport Master Plan Study Need: The Airport s last Master Plan was completed in 2008, since which the Airport has experienced above average growth in passenger enplanements. Project Start Date: September 2016 Project Completion Date: May 2018 Total Project Cost: $1,087,746 FAA Grant: $978,971 State Grant: $54,387 PFC Funds: $54,388 Project 1.13 Conduct Environmental Assessment Description: This project includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate potential social, environmental, and economic consequences of implementing the 5 year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at PGD, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The EA will focus on projects likely to be included in the 5 year CIP, including, but not limited to: General Aviation Apron and Facilities Construction, Fixed Base Operator and Maintenance Facilities Construction, Perimeter Road Construction, and Airfield Pavement Overlay and Rehabilitation. 16

222 Project 1.13 Conduct Environmental Assessment Need: Those projects included in the 5 year CIP are likely to be identified for nearterm construction based on current planning at PGD. The forthcoming Master Plan Update will affirm and verify these recommendations, and provide conceptual design and planning data necessary to complete the EA. The EA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of FAA Orders F and B and will include conceptual design sufficient to receive FAA environmental approval of the proposed projects. Project Start Date: September 2016 Project Completion Date: May 2018 Total Project Cost: $361,394 FAA Grant: $325,255 State Grant: $18,069 PFC Funds: $18,070 Project 1.14 Extend Terminal Apron to the North Description: This project includes the extension of the terminal aircraft parking apron to the north. It includes approximately 9,653 square yards of portland cement concrete pavement and 3,191 square yards of asphalt pavement. This apron extension will provide for two additional aircraft parking positions. This project will be designed to ADG III standards. Need: Due to the rapid growth of commercial passenger service at PGD, it is necessary to expand the area used by commercial aviation. PGD currently has 7 parking positions for MD 80 / A 320 type aircraft. PGD regularly has as many as 9 aircraft on the ground. Project Start Date: March 2017 Project Completion Date: September 2017 Total Project Cost: $2,622,500 FAA Grant: $2,360,250 State Grant: $131,125 PFC Funds: $131,125 17

223 Project 1.14 Extend Terminal Apron to the North Project 1.14 Extend Terminal Apron to the North 18

224 Project 1.15 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for the Punta Gorda Airport. The new tower is approximately 122 feet high and provides for two controller positions. The shaft was construction of precast concrete slabs and the cab was of steel frame construction. The project includes an other transaction agreement between the FAA and the Airport to provide the labor and materials required to establish the Operator Input Device (OID), establish NAVAIDS controls, and establish FAA communication lines to the new ATCT. The tower is included in the FAA Contract Tower (FCT) Program. The tower was designed in accordance with FCT Program standards. The location of the tower was determined based on a July 2009 Siting Report using the current version of FAA Order , Air Traffic Control Tower Siting Process. Project 1.15 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower Need: Prior to the construction of this ATCT, Punta Gorda was a non towered airport meaning pilots follow recommended procedures for arriving and departing the airport and communicate on a common traffic advisory frequency. With the increased number of operations at the Airport and the mix of aircraft sizes and speeds, an ATCT was determined necessary to ensure safe operations at the airport. Project Start Date: March 2010 Project Completion Date: February 2012 Total Project Cost: $4,160,128 State Grant: $3,328,100 PFC Funds: $832,028 19

225 Project 1.15 Construct Air Traffic Control Tower Project 1.16 Install Instrument Landing System Description: This project includes the design and construction of an Instrument Landing System (ILS) for Runway 04 at the Airport. The system includes the localizer, glideslope and distance measuring equipment (DME). The project includes the site preparation, installation of electrical and telecommunication infrastructure, construction of the foundations, construction of the service road and shelter area, and installation of the ILS equipment. The project also includes the flight check of the ILS. This is a Cat I ILS. Need: Given the increase in aircraft operations, specifically of commercial passenger aircraft, the installation of an ILS was determined necessary to allow aircraft to land at the airport during periods of inclement weather. Project Start Date: May 2015 Project Completion Date: September 2015 Total Project Cost: $1,988,954 State Grant: $1,691,163 PFC Funds: $297,791 20

226 Project 1.17 PFC Administration Costs Description: PFC eligible general formation costs included in this PFC project are the necessary expenditures to prepare the new PFC application. Also included are eligible ongoing administrative costs, amendments and closeout for this PFC application. Need: This project is necessary to develop and administer the PFC program. Project Start Date: June 2016 Project Completion Date: July 2022 Total Project Cost (100% PFC Funded): $62,500 Project 1.18 Mitigate Wetlands Description: This project includes the design and construction necessary to mitigate approximately 37 acres of wetlands located within the airfield operating environment, identified as Areas B, G, L and F. The project will include backfilling, regrading, installation of pipes or culverts and associated work necessary to eliminate or relocate the wetlands in the airfield environment. These wetlands have been prioritized based on their impact to aviation. Need: Wetlands have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near publicuse airports. This wetland mitigation was recommended by the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan updated March 10, This project will follow Advisory Circular 150/ B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports. Project Start Date: March 2018 Project Completion Date: December 2020 Total Project Cost: $5,000,000 FAA Grant: $2,250,000 PFC Funds: $2,750,000 21

227 Project 1.18 Mitigate Wetlands Project 1.18 Mitigate Wetlands Alternative Project #1 Taxiway E Extension This project includes the extension of Taxiway E of approximately 1,700 of asphalt pavement to provide a full length parallel taxiway for Runway 09/27. This would include the relocation of the existing Taxiway E to meet the ADG III standards. The project also includes the construction of drainage structures, pavement markings and airfield lighting. The estimated cost for this project is $2,550,000. Alternative Project #2 Apron Expansion to the North of Runway 09/27 This project includes the construction of additional aircraft parking apron north of Runway 09/27. The construction of aprons and taxilanes will be of asphalt pavement. The additional parking apron will provide 80 aircraft parking positions. The project also includes pavement markings, apron lighting and perimeter fencing. The estimated cost for this project is $3,150,

228 Project 1.18 Mitigate Wetlands Alternative Projects Proposed PFC Application #1 Financial Plan Summary Project Total State PFC PFC Other State/ Total No. Project Title AIP Grant(s) AIP Local Match Local Match Other Local Funds Project Cost Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation 22, 24 2,883, ,761 3,035, Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension 23, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31 1,564,877 41,181 41,181 1,647, Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase ,390,250 42,280 83,533 2,516, Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Equipment 31, 33 1,007,579 26,248 54,412 1,088, Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices 31 86,260 4,540 51, , Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension 31 62,769 3,304 66, Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings 31 29,355 1,545 30, Expand Terminal Building 32, 33 6,225, , , ,889 2,225,368 9,749, Reconfigure Access Road ,362 23,187 23,186 79, , Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management P ,200 6,900 6, , Construct a Portion of Taxiway A 34 2,459, , ,662 2,733, Update Airport Master Plan Study ,971 54,387 54,388 1,087, Conduct Environmental Assessment ,255 18,069 18, , Extend Terminal Apron to the North Future 2,360, , ,125 2,622, Construct Air Traffic Control Tower None 832,028 3,328,100 4,160, Install Instrument Landing System None 297,791 1,691,163 1,988, PFC Administration Costs None 62,500 62, Mitigate Wetlands Future 2,250, ,000 2,500,000 5,000,000 Totals 23,165, ,880 1,306,448 4,350,708 7,324,355 36,973,038 $ 5,657,156 Total Impose PFCs $ 2,907,156 Total Use PFCs 23

229 Next Steps In PFC Application Process October 25, 2016 November 25, 2016 December 15, 2016 December 30, 2016 January 31, 2017 April 30, 2017 July 1, 2017 Airline Consultation Meeting Deadline for Airline Certification of Agreement or Disagreement with Proposed Application #1 Deadline for Public Comments Airport Authority Approval of PFC Resolution Submit Proposed Application #1 to the FAA FAA determines application to be substantially complete Latest Day for FAA approval of new application if no disagreement PFC Application #1 Collection Start Date Questions/Comments 24

230 PUBLIC COMMENT Attached is the Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment as required by Part 158 Passenger Facility Charges Section This Notice was posted on the Airport s website on September 23, 2016 allowing the public to file comments through October 28, No Comments were provided by the public related to the projects contained in this application.

231 NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES Charlotte County Airport Authority is providing an opportunity for public comment until October 28, 2016 related to our proposed new Impose and Use and Impose Only Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application #1 for the Punta Gorda Airport. This written notice is provided in accordance with requirements contained in Federal Aviation Regulation 49 CFR Part Passenger Facility Charge. The Authority plans to implement the PFC rate of $2.00 per enplaned passenger. We anticipate collection on this application to begin on July 1, Future PFC projects will likely extend the expiration date. The total PFC revenue to be collected for projects in this application (impose authority) is $5,657,156. The total PFC use authority requested in this application is $3,157,156. The PFC expiration date for this application is estimated to be July 1, The seventeen Impose and Use projects and one Impose Only project in this application are described below. Impose and Use Projects Terminal Complex North Apron Reconstruction/Rehabilitation This project includes the design, reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Terminal Complex North Apron. The project includes the demolition of the existing pavement and the construction of two pavement sections, one rigid and one flexible, of adequate strength for the aircraft utilizing the apron. The reconstructed pavement was approximately 22,253 square yards of 12 portland cement concrete pavement. This project was designed to ADG-III standards. The existing apron was concrete pavement over 60 years old of varying thickness ranging from 4 to 10 inches, and lacked adequate load transfer between slabs. The structural capacity and fatigue life of the pavement had been reached and exceeded with the addition of the new commercial service operating A319s. Corner cracks, slab shattering, spalls and transverse cracking were present and deterioration was accelerating. The pavement was generating a significant amount of foreign object debris. The start date for this project was September 2008 and was completed in July The total cost of this project was $3,035,229 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #22 and #24 in the amount of $2,883,468. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $151, Runway 04 Takeoff Pavement Extension This project includes the design and construction of improvements to Runway 04 and associated taxiways. The specific project elements included the following: the construction of new taxiway Hotel from Taxiway Delta to the Runway 04 threshold; the remarking of Runway to Runway 04-22; lighting and signage upgrades consistent with the new taxiway and runway

232 renaming; and the construction of fillets on the connectors from Taxiway Delta to the Terminal Apron. The new taxiway Hotel constructed in this project was approximately 150 feet wide and 500 feet in length constructed of 7 of asphalt. This project was necessary to address recommendations from the Airport s Part 139 inspection after the restoration of scheduled air carrier service at the airport. The improvements enhanced safety by reducing the potential for aircraft collision in the immediate runway environment at the intersection of Runway 03 (renamed Runway 04) and Runway 33. The construction of the new Taxiway Hotel provided aircraft a means of taxiing to Runway 04 without the need to taxi on Runway 33 to access Runway 04. The project also reduced the potential for aircraft excursions off taxiway connectors between Taxiway Delta and the air carrier terminal apron. The start date for this project was October 2007 and was completed in December The total cost of this project was $1,647,239 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #23, #25, #28, #29, #30 and #31 in the amount of $1,564,877. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $41,181 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $41, Rehabilitate and Widen Taxiway A and C, Phase 1 This project includes the design and rehabilitation of Taxiways A and C as well as the widening of those taxiways. The taxiways were 40 wide and were widened to 60 wide in order to accommodate Group III aircraft. The existing pavement was milled and overlaid. The new pavement was constructed with 4 of asphalt. The project also included the relocation of the taxiway edge lights. The rehabilitation of the pavement was necessary to preserve and extend the structural and function lives of these pavements. The widening was necessary in order to meet the geometric standards necessary for the aircraft utilizing the taxiways. Prior to the widening of the pavements, commercial aircraft were required to back taxi on the primary Runway The start date for this project was March 2009 and was completed in February The total cost of this project was $2,516,063 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #26 in the amount of $2,390,250. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $42,280 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $83, Acquire Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Equipment This project consists of the purchase of two pieces of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Equipment necessary to satisfy the Airport s ARFF Index C requirements. Both units are E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF trucks. The trucks are equipped with 1,500-gallon water tanks and s 205-gallon foam tanks. The trucks are powered by a 665hp diesel engine. The first piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF71, a 2007 E-One Titan 4x4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 4ENGAAA The second piece of equipment purchased was Unit ARFF72 a 2014 E-One Titan 4X4 ARFF truck with the VIN# 2EN9AAA8XE

233 These purchases were made in accordance with applicable FAA Advisory Circular 150/ , Guide Specification for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Vehicles. These ARFF trucks were necessary for the Airport to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR 139. The start date for this project was January 2008 and it was completed in March The total cost of this project was $1,090,740 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grants #31 and #33 in the amount of $1,009,829. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $40,455 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $40,456. The funding breakdown by purchase is as follows: Unit AIP Grant # AIP Funds State Funds PFC Funds Total ARFF71 31 $535,101 $0 $28,163 $563,264 ARFF72 33 $472,478 $26,248 $26,249 $524,975 Totals $1,007,579 $26,248 $54,412 $1,088, Acquire ADA Passenger Lift Devices This project consists of the purchase of three passenger ADA lifts sized to accommodate MD-80 and 737 sized aircraft. The lifts meet the 19 degree requirements of Advisory Circulars 150/ and 150/ B. They also meet the FAA required 90mph wind standards when stowed. The lifts are used by all air carriers and are adjustable to accommodate multiple sized aircraft. These lifts were necessary to satisfy ADA requirements given the larger passenger commercial aircraft now utilizing the airport. The start date for this project was September 2010 and is estimated to be completed in December Two of the lift devices were acquired utilizing AIP funds. The third was acquired with 100% local airport funds. The total cost of this project was $142,300 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $86,260. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $4,540 plus the cost of the third lift acquired entirely with local funds in the amount of $51,500. The total PFC amount requested is $56, Convert Taxiway H to Runway 4 Extension This project included the work required to convert Taxiway Hotel (constructed as part of PFC Project above) from taxiway pavement to runway pavement. This work included the associated modifications necessary to the pavement markings, edge lights and airfield signage. This project allowed for the extension of the landing and takeoff surfaces of Runway 04/22 after completion of the environmental requirements for such a runway extension. The start date for this project was September 2010 and it was completed in December The total cost of this project was $66,073 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $62,769. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $3,304.

234 Install Surface Painted Hold Position Markings This project included the placement of surface painted holding position signs at the entrance to any runway from a taxiway. This included twelve locations across the airfield. The markings were done in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5340-1J, Standards for Airport Markings. This project was necessary in order for the Airport to satisfy the requirements under 14 CFR 139. The start date for this project was September 2010 and it was completed in December The total cost of this project was $30,900 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #31 in the amount of $29,355. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $1, Expand Terminal Building This project included the design and construction of an expansion to the Airport s passenger terminal building and rehabilitation of the existing structure. The project included a rehabilitation of the existing structure of 16,082 square feet and new construction of the expansion that provided an additional 38,647 square feet. The project followed Advisory Circular 150/5360-9, Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at Non-hub Airports, Advisory Circular 150/ , Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities, as well as ACRP, IATA and TSA guidelines, and current design conventions to design the terminal to accommodate a 610 peak hour passenger demand. Included in this project is the installation and reconfiguration of the inbound and outbound baggage systems. The inbound system included a relocation and rehabilitation of the existing flat plate baggage carousel to its new location in the terminal building. A new second flat plate baggage carousel was installed. These inbound baggage carousels are 137 linear feet. The outbound baggage system included a temporary outbound conveyor system followed by the permanent outbound conveyor system which included ticket counter conveyors, general transport and make-up flat plate carousel. These systems included the necessary motors, wiring, control panels and security doors. The existing terminal structure was constructed in September 2007 after the previous terminal was destroyed in 2004 by Hurricane Charley. The terminal was sized based on commercial air service at the time which was a single service carrier with six daily flights to only two destinations. Two additional carriers have added service and the terminal could no longer support the current and anticipated future needs of the proposed growth. Passenger enplanement growth is provided below (as per the FAA ACAIS reports ; Airport records for 2015): Calendar Year Total Enplanements , , , ,041

235 , , , , ,017 The start date for this project was November 2014 and it was completed in March The funding breakdown by grant is as follows: AIP Funds PFC Funds State Funds Local Total Funds AIP Grant 32 $590,927 $32,829 $39,085 $190,200 $853,041 AIP Grant 33 $5,634,211 $313,012 $1,249,568 $936,553 $8,133,344 Baggage System $0 $606,889 $155,804 $0 $762,693 Totals $6,225,138 $952,730 $1,444,457 $1,126,753 $9,749, Reconfigure Access Road This project included the design and construction of modifications to the terminal building access road. The work included the demolition of existing asphalt pavements, construction of new asphalt pavements with compacted subgrade and base course, sodding, lighting, stormwater, pavement markings, and various electrical amenities. The project also included the construction of a drainage culvert. This work was necessary to align the terminal access road (Viking Avenue) directly to the terminal road curbside with the terminal building. This alignment provided for safer and orderly flow of vehicle access to the passenger drop off and loading curb of the terminal building. The start date for this project was February 2013 and it was completed in November The total cost of this project was $543,459 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #32 in the amount of $417,362. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $23,187. PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining eligible local match of $23,187. Ineligible costs totaled $79,724 and were funded with State and Airport funds Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan The project consists of the development of a Wildlife Hazard Assessment followed by a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan. 14 CFR , Wildlife hazard management, of Part 139 Certification of Airports regulations require the County, as the holder of an Airport Operating Certificate, to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA). The assessment includes the elements required under part (c) of the regulation. Upon completion, the FAA reviewed the WHA and determined that the certificate holder must develop and implement a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) designated to mitigate wildlife hazards to aviation on or near the airport utilizing the WHA as the scientific basis. The Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, includes all of the elements required in part (f) of the regulation.

236 The start date for this project was November 2012 and it was completed in March The total cost of this project was $138,000. The FAA provided funding under AIP federal grant #32 in the amount of $124,200. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $6,900 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $6, Construct a Portion of Taxiway A This project includes the design and construction of additional Taxiway A in between Taxiway C and Runway 15/33. This includes approximately 1,924 linear feet of 60 wide asphalt taxiway pavement. This also includes the associated site preparation and taxiway edge lighting. This project is necessary to increase safety and alleviate congestion of taxiing aircraft in the airfield. Runway is the primary runway and the only runway utilized by the commercial passenger air carriers. When Runway 22 is in use, a bottleneck occurs on Taxiway C and Taxiway D of aircraft exiting Runway and aircraft taxiing to Runway 22 to depart. This congestion leads to delays in taxiing and even pushing back from the gate. The start date for this project was December 2015 and is estimated to be completed in August The total cost of this project is estimated to be $2,733,237. The FAA provided funding under AIP federal grant #34 in the amount of $2,459,913. State of Florida provided funds in the amount of $136,662 and PFC funds are requested to fund the remaining local match of $136, Update Airport Master Plan Study This project consists of a Master Plan Study update. The Master Plan is a comprehensive study of the Airport including short, medium and long term airport development plans to meet future aviation demand. The Master Plan project will follow FAA guidance provided in Advisory Circular , Airport Master Plans incorporating those elements necessary based on the specific needs and assets at the Airport. The Master Plan will show all existing and planned development on an updated ALP to illustrate proposed improvements to the Airport. New forecasts of aviation demand, evaluation of alternatives, and a long term capital improvement plan will be prepared to meet the Airport s long term aeronautical needs in a financially feasible manner. The Master Plan will present the research and logic from which the plan evolved and displays the plan on graphic and written format. This project will include the new Master Plan requirements for Geographic Information System (GIS) data and an e-alp as well as plans for recycling or minimizing the generation of airport solid waste. The Airport s last Master Plan was completed in 2008, since which the Airport has experienced above average growth in passenger enplanements. The start date for this project is estimated to be September 2016 and it is estimated to be completed in May The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,087,746 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #35 in the amount of $978,971. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $54,387 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $54,388.

237 Conduct Environmental Assessment This project includes the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate potential social, environmental, and economic consequences of implementing the 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at PGD, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The EA will focus on projects likely to be included in the 5-year CIP, including, but not limited to: General Aviation Apron and Facilities Construction, Fixed Base Operator and Maintenance Facilities Construction, Perimeter Road Construction, and Airfield Pavement Overlay and Rehabilitation. Those projects included in the 5-year CIP are likely to be identified for near-term construction based on current planning at PGD. The forthcoming Master Plan Update will affirm and verify these recommendations, and provide conceptual design and planning data necessary to complete the EA. The EA will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of FAA Orders F and B and will include conceptual design sufficient to receive FAA environmental approval of the proposed projects. The start date for this project is estimated to be September 2016 and it is estimated to be completed in May The total cost of this project is estimated to be $361,394 with FAA funding under an AIP federal grant #35 in the amount of $325,255. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $18,069 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $18, Extend Terminal Apron to the North This project includes the extension of the terminal aircraft parking apron to the north. It includes approximately 9,653 square yards of portland cement concrete pavement and 3,191 square yards of asphalt pavement. This apron extension will provide for two additional aircraft parking positions. This project will be designed to ADG-III standards. Due to the rapid growth of commercial passenger service at PGD, it is necessary to expand the area used by commercial aviation. PGD currently has 7 parking positions for MD-80 / A-320 type aircraft. PGD regularly has as many as 9 aircraft on the ground. The start date for this project is estimated to be March 2017 and it is estimated to be completed in September The total cost of this project is estimated to be $2,622,500 with FAA funding under a future AIP federal grant in the amount of $2,360,250. The State of Florida is expected to provide funds in the amount of $131,125 and PFC funds are requested to provide the remaining local match of $131, Construct Air Traffic Control Tower This project includes the design and construction of a new Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for the Punta Gorda Airport. The new tower is approximately 122 feet high and provides for two controller positions. The shaft was construction of precast concrete slabs and the cab was of steel frame construction. The project includes an other transaction agreement between the FAA

238 and the Airport to provide the labor and materials required to establish the Operator Input Device (OID), establish NAVAIDS controls, and establish FAA communication lines to the new ATCT. The tower is included in the FAA Contract Tower (FCT) Program. The tower was designed in accordance with FCT Program standards. The location of the tower was determined based on a July 2009 Siting Report using the current version of FAA Order , Air Traffic Control Tower Siting Process. Prior to the construction of this ATCT, Punta Gorda was a non-towered airport meaning pilots follow recommended procedures for arriving and departing the airport and communicate on a common traffic advisory frequency. With the increased number of operations at the Airport and the mix of aircraft sizes and speeds, an ATCT was determined necessary to ensure safe operations at the airport. The start date for this project was March 2010 and was completed in February The total cost of this project was $4,160,128 with the State of Florida providing funds in the amount of $3,328,100 and PFC funds are being requested to fund the remaining $832, Install Instrument Landing System This project includes the design and construction of an Instrument Landing System (ILS) for Runway 04 at the Airport. The system includes the localizer, glideslope and distance measuring equipment (DME). The project includes the site preparation, installation of electrical and telecommunication infrastructure, construction of the foundations, construction of the service road and shelter area, and installation of the ILS equipment. The project also includes the flight check of the ILS. This is a Cat-I ILS. Given the increase in aircraft operations, specifically of commercial passenger aircraft, the installation of an ILS was determined necessary to allow aircraft to land at the airport during periods of inclement weather. The start date for this project was May 2015 and was completed in September The total cost of this project was $1,988,954 with the State of Florida providing funds in the amount of $1,691,163 and PFC funds are being requested to fund the remaining $297, PFC Administration Costs PFC-eligible general formation costs included in this PFC project are the necessary expenditures to prepare the new PFC application. Also included are eligible ongoing administrative costs, amendments and closeout for this PFC application. Development associated with the approved projects in this application will enhance capacity at the Airport. The total cost of this project is $62,500. PFCs are anticipated to provide 100% funding for this project. This project started in June 2016 and will be complete in July 2022.

239 Impose Only Project Mitigate Wetlands This project includes the design and construction necessary to mitigate approximately 37 acres of wetlands located within the airfield operating environment, identified as Areas B, G, L and F. The project will include backfilling, regrading, installation of pipes or culverts and associated work necessary to eliminate or relocate the wetlands in the airfield environment. These wetlands have been prioritized based on their impact to aviation. Wetlands have the potential to attract hazardous wildlife on or near public-use airports. This wetland mitigation was recommended by the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan updated March 10, This project will follow Advisory Circular 150/ B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports. The start date for this project is estimated to be March 2018 and it is estimated to be completed in December The total cost of this project is estimated to be $5,000,000 with FAA funding under a future AIP federal grant in of approximately $2,250,000. PFC funds are requested to fund the local match of $250,000 plus the costs in excess of available AIP funds estimated to be $2,500,000. The total PFC amount requested is $2,250,000. Alternative Projects for Impose Only Projects Alternative Project #1 Taxiway E Extension This project includes the extension of Taxiway E of approximately 1,700 of asphalt pavement to provide a full length parallel taxiway for Runway 09/27. This would include the relocation of the existing Taxiway E to meet the ADG-III standards. The project also includes the construction of drainage structures, pavement markings and airfield lighting. The estimated cost for this project is $2,550,000. Alternative Project #2 Apron Expansion to the North of Runway 09/27 This project includes the construction of additional aircraft parking apron north of Runway 09/27. The construction of aprons and taxilanes will be of asphalt pavement. The additional parking apron will provide 80 aircraft parking positions. The project also includes pavement markings, apron lighting and perimeter fencing. The estimated cost for this project is $3,150,000. Comments or a request for more detailed project descriptions should be sent to James Parish, P.E., President/CEO, A-1 Airport Road, Punta Gorda, FL

240 Legal notices Page 1 of 2 9/23/2016 Employment Contact Search FLIGHT INFO PARKING & GROUND TRANSPORTATION AIRPORT INFORMATION ABOUT CCAA BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORT FACILITIES About CCAA You are here: Home > About CCAA > Legal notices Charlotte County Airport Authority News Releases Monthly Statistics Employment Meeting and Events Calendar Economic Impact Study Legal notices Public Notice PFC-1 Tentative Budget Hearing ad Meeting Change Ad Notice of Emergency Meeting June 24, 2016 Notice of Special Meeting April 26, 2016 Meeting Cancelation Ad Emergency Meeting April 14, 2016 Tentative Budget Ad Emergency Meeting August 25, 2015 Special Meeting July 2, 2015 Workshop April 9, 2015 Disclaimer Under Florida's very broad public records law, communication to and from the Charlotte County Airport Authority is subject to public disclosure. Quicklinks Home Contact Us About Punta Gorda Airport Employment Flight Info Arrivals/Departures Airlines Flight Tracking Flight Map Parking & Ground Transportation Directions, Map and Rates Rental Cars Taxi/Shuttle Service Airport Information Airport Services Security and Alerts Lost and Found Frequently Asked Questions Airport Facilities Terminal Diagram Runway Diagrams NOTAMS Air Traffic Control ASOS Weather Contact Information A-1 Airport Road Punta Gorda, FL Phone Badging and 511 Travel Information Tie-Down/Hangar Fax Drivers Noise Mitigation Program Rentals Education Dining and Lodging Contact Us Aviation Fuel Prices Pilot and Gift Shop Tenant Directory Related Links Services Copyright 2016 Charlotte County Airport Authority Site created by 4What