Maintenance Cost Estimation Method of an Aircraft Manufacturer

Transcription

1 Maintenance Cost Estimation Method of an Aircraft Manufacturer Taro Ogawa Strategic Marketing Director, Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation September 10th, 2014 DISCLAIMER: This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation ( Mitsubishi Aircraft ), and shall not be (a) used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied or (b) reproduced or disclosed in any way to any third party, in each case, in whole or in part, without Mitsubishi Aircraft s prior written consent. No rights or licenses under any intellectual property right in or to any information contained herein are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its contents. This document and all information contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is subject to change. In addition, the information herein may include certain statements, estimates, targets and projections that reflect significant assumptions and subjective judgments by Mitsubishi Aircraft concerning anticipated results that may or may not prove to be correct and there can be no assurance that any such statements, estimates, targets or projections are attainable or will be realized. No statement herein (or the acceptance thereof) shall constitute any contractual offer by, nor create any obligation on the part of, Mitsubishi Aircraft. Mitsubishi Aircraft hereby expressly disclaims all representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information contained herein. MITSUBISHI AIRCRAFT PROPRIETARY - 1 -

2 Today s Topics This picture is available for public use. The Company and the MRJ Maintenance Cost Estimation Method of an Aircraft Manufacturer - 2 -

3 The Company and the MRJ - 3 -

4 Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation 36% 64% Development Bank of Japan Capital : US$1.0 billion Headquarters (Nagoya) Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation America, Inc. (Addison/Dallas) Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation Europe B.V. (Amsterdam) Tokyo Office - 4 -

5 MRJ Family MRJ100X (Plan) 100 seats MRJ90 88 seats MRJ70 76 seats - 5 -

6 MRJ Key Features Environment Lowest Fuel Burn, Noise, Emissions Passengers Most Comfortable Cabin Airlines Most Efficient Aircraft - 6 -

7 Program Schedule Q First Flight Q First Delivery - 7 -

8 First Flight Test Aircraft (as of June 26, 2014) - 8 -

9 MRJ Order Status Order Option / Purchase Right All Nippon Airways Trans States Holdings SkyWest, Inc Air Mandalay Limited 6 4 Total Eastern Air Lines (MOU) Japan Airlines (LOI) 20 Orders Orders Purchase Rights - 9 -

10 Maintenance Cost Estimation Method of an Aircraft Manufacturer

11 Maintenance Cost the Second Largest Element in COC Cash Operating Cost (COC) Breakdown * Typical regional jet, US regional operation, 500nm Trip, Fuel Price=$3.0/USG

12 Designing Maintenance Cost of New Aircraft Maintenance cost benchmarking is essential to establish a target U.S. DoT Form 41 is one of the useful database for benchmarking Maintenance Cost of existing aircraft Target for new aircraft Existing Aircraft Maintenance cost data U.S. DoT Form 41 Publications

13 U.S. DoT Form 41 Financial Data Published data collected by U.S. Department of Transportation Includes maintenance cost data of all airlines in the U.S. Quarterly cost data by aircraft type by airline Huge database publicly available online from 1990 in a consistent format No influence from currency exchange rate

14 Normalization of DoT Form 41 Data Aircraft age Outsource/In-house ratio Labor rates Average flight time

15 Aging Curve Mature period Aging Factor Aircraft Age CONFIDENTIAL This document does not constitute an offer of any kind and no assurances are given as to the information contained herein. NAM

16 Average Flight Hour Adjustment Labor Cost Material Cost Labor Cost ($/FH) Material Cost ($/FH) 1.5 (baseline) 1.5 (baseline) Average flight hour (FH/FC) Average flight hour (FH/FC) CONFIDENTIAL This document does not constitute an offer of any kind and no assurances are given as to the information contained herein. NAM

17 Normalized Maintenance Cost from DoT Form 41 DoT Form 41 data was processed and aggregated by aircraft family Aircraft Maintenance Cost ($/FH) Limited available data * 100% in-house maintenance, Labor Rate $50/MH, 1.5FH/FC, Mature

18 Model Adjustment Family Aircraft Aircraft families (e.g and ) have many common systems which have almost the same maintenance cost Maintenance costs for each type are estimated by analyzing specification differences between family aircraft MRJ90 Same Avionics APU Wing Empennage Landing Gear Electrical &Mechanical components, etc. MRJ70 Different Fuselage length Cabin length Weight, etc

19 Maintenance Costs for Benchmarking MRJ target cost is established to be lower than competition Aircraft Maintenance Cost ($/FH) * 100% in-house maintenance, Labor Rate $50/MH, 1.5FH/FC, Mature

20 Designing Maintenance Cost Bottom-Up Approach Aircraft Maintenance Cost = Airframe Maintenance Cost + Component Maintenance Cost On-Airplane Off-Airplane System (ATA 21-49) Airframe Maintenance Cost Component Maintenance Cost Structure (ATA 51-57) (Line/A/C/Dcheck) (Mixed)

21 Airframe Maintenance Cost Analyzing maintenance program Collecting field data for estimation Maintenance Program Analysis On-Airplane Off-Airplane Task card MH / Actual Labor MH Routine / Non-routine Labor cost / Material cost System Structure Airframe Maintenance Cost (Line/A/C/Dcheck) Component Maintenance Cost (Mixed)

22 Component Maintenance Cost Collecting & analyzing maintenance cost information from system suppliers On-Airplane Off-Airplane System Structure Airframe Maintenance Cost (Line/A/C/Dcheck) Component Maintenance Cost (Mixed) Supplier cost data Avionics Landing Gear Brakes Wheels & Tires APU Other components

23 Engine Maintenance Cost Geared Turbo Fan (GTF) engine contributes lower maintenance cost. Fan Drive Gear System: No Life-limited parts (LLPs) High bypass ratio: Lower core deterioration 60% fewer turbine airfoils 25,000-cycle LLPs

24 MRJ s Low Maintenance Cost by Design State-of-the-art technology for cost reduction - Composite material - Full Fly-by-Wire - LED/HID lighting Maintainability validation by digital & physical mockups MSG-3 Analysis feedbacks to MRJ design Engine maintenance cost reduction by GTF engine

25 Summary Maintenance cost is the second largest element in cash operating cost U.S. DoT Form 41 is useful data to benchmark the maintenance costs of the competition Aircraft Manufacturers design aircraft to achieve lower maintenance cost by design

26 Mitsubishi Regional Jet, a new concept from Japan for the skies of the world

27 Legend This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation ( Mitsubishi Aircraft ), and shall not be (a) used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied or (b) reproduced or disclosed in any way to any third party, in each case, in whole or in part, without Mitsubishi Aircraft s prior written consent. No rights or licenses under any intellectual property right in or to any information contained herein are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its contents. This document and all information contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is subject to change. In addition, the information herein may include certain statements, estimates, targets and projections that reflect significant assumptions and subjective judgments by Mitsubishi Aircraft concerning anticipated results that may or may not prove to be correct and there can be no assurance that any such statements, estimates, targets or projections are attainable or will be realized. No statement herein (or the acceptance thereof) shall constitute any contractual offer by, nor create any obligation on the part of, Mitsubishi Aircraft. Mitsubishi Aircraft hereby expressly disclaims all representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information contained