Pennsylvania Public Transportation ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT. Fiscal Year

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Pennsylvania Public Transportation ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT. Fiscal Year"

Transcription

1 Pennsylvania Public Transportation ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT Fiscal Year April 3, 216

2 On the cover: Mount Joy Amtrak Station Preliminary design, Market Street Bridge looking west Courtesy of Michael Baker International Beaver County Transit Authority Station Courtesy of Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission Washington City Transit (now Freedom Transit) Paratransit Bus Courtesy of Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission SEPTA Commuter Train at Secane Station Courtesy of PennDOT The T Light Rail, Pittsburgh Courtesy of Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission Capital Area Transit Fixed-Route Bus, Harrisburg Courtesy of Michael Baker International

3 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Public Transportation

4 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FY April 3, 216 Dear Fellow Pennsylvanians, I am pleased to submit the Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance Report for the state fiscal year. Pennsylvania s public transportation is moving toward the future, in part with additional and critically needed resources provided by Act 89 of 213, the far-reaching funding plan that put transit on a more solid footing. The Commonwealth is very fortunate to have a world class transportation system, which adds value to the lives of millions of Pennsylvanians every day. This report shows you how transportation operates throughout our state. Innovations in public transportation help seniors travel safely to the grocery store, allow individuals to book shared ride trips online, and cost effectively get hardworking Pennsylvanians to jobs that drive our economy. This year, the Annual Performance Report reflects the advancements that have taken place, including regionalization and the implementation of cutting-edge scheduling software, solutions that streamline transportation systems and save Pennsylvanians money, while continuing to offer a superior customer product. Please use this document to see how Pennsylvania works for its residents. Included are transit agency performance reports published since the last year. These reports show how transit agencies compare against their peers on specific performance criteria. Capital highlights demonstrate how the added funding provided by Act 89 has been effectively managed to modernize agencies fleets, facilities, and other capital improvements. These improvements will be long lasting and allow agencies to maintain a state of good repair into the future. Additionally, the Bureau of Public Transportation revamped its website, adding greater transparency and connection with customers. Many dedicated individuals have contributed to the success of public transportation in Pennsylvania, from vehicle operators, mechanics, and clients to communities and private organizations. Pennsylvania continues to invest in its future with pride through quality public transportation programs and capital projects. Sincerely, Leslie S. Richards Secretary Department of Transportation

5 intentionally blank Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year i-1

7 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I: Transit Agency Performance Review Executive Summaries... 1 Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority (LANta)... 6 Butler Transit Authority (BTA) Lower Anthracite Transit Authority (LATS) York Adams Transportation Authority (YATA) Carbon County Community Transit (CCCT)... 3 Hazleton Public Transit (HPT) Indiana County Transit Authority (IndiGO) Westmoreland County Transit Authority (WCTA) Section II: Section 1513 Distribution Factors Act 44 Passenger Trips Act 44 Senior Citizen Trips Act 44 Revenue Vehicle Miles Act 44 Revenue Vehicle Hours Section III: Urban Systems Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) Altoona Metro Transit (AMTRAN)... 7 Beaver County Transit Authority (BCTA) Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority (BARTA) Cambria County Transit Authority (CamTran)... 8 Capital Area Transit (CAT) Centre Area Transportation Authority (CATA) County of Lackawanna Transit System (COLTS) County of Lebanon Transit Authority (COLT/LT) Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority (EMTA)... 1 Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation (FACT) Hazleton Public Transit (HPT) Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority (LANta) Luzerne County Transportation Authority (LCTA) Mercer County Regional Council of Governments (MCRCOG) Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority (MMVTA) Pottstown Area Rapid Transit (PART) Red Rose Transit Authority (RRTA) i-2 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

8 Table of Contents Washington County Transportation Authority Washington, City of Westmoreland County Transit Authority (WCTA) River Valley Transit (Williamsport RVT) York Adams County Transportation Authority (YATA) Section IV: Rural Systems Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA (ATA) Butler Transit Authority (BTA) Carbon County Community Transit (CCCT) Crawford Area Transportation Authority (CATA) DuBois, Falls Creek, Sandy Township Joint Transportation Authority (DuFAST) Endless Mountains Transportation Authority (EMTA) Indiana County Transit Authority (IndiGO) Mid County Transit Authority Monroe County Transportation Authority (MCTA) Borough of Mount Carmel (BMC) New Castle Area Transit Authority (NCATA) Schuylkill Transportation System (STS) Venango County Transportation Office (VCTO) Transit Authority of Warren County (TAWC) TABLE OF CONTENTS Section V: Community Transportation Allied Coordinated Transportation Services, Inc. (ACTS)/Lawrence County Blair Senior Services, Inc./Blair County... 2 Bucks County Transport, Inc Butler County Community Action & Development Centre County ROVER/Chester County Clarion County Cumberland County Delaware County Forest County Franklin County Greene County Huntingdon, Bedford, and Fulton Counties Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year i-3

9 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Mifflin and Juniata Counties (CARS) Montour County Transit MTR Transportation, Inc./Columbia County Northumberland County Perry County Pike County Somerset County STEP, Inc./Lycoming and Clinton Counties Suburban Transit Network, Inc./Montgomery County Susquehanna County Transportation Union/Snyder Transportation Alliance (USTA) Wayne County Section VI: Capital Project Highlights Section VII: Intercity Bus Carl R. Bieber, Inc The Fullington Auto Bus Company Greyhound Lines, Inc Myers Coach Lines, Inc Susquehanna Transit Company Section VIII: Passenger Rail Section IX: Glossary of Terms Section X: Index i-4 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

10 PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Section I Transit Agency Performance Review Executive Summaries Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

11 PERFORMANCE REVIEWS intentionally blank 2 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

12 Pennsylvania s Public Transportation Performance Review Program In July 27 the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 44, establishing a framework to assess transit agency performance through a formal review process. The review identifies ways to improve transit system efficiency and effectiveness and best practices that may be beneficial to other transit systems. Transit agencies develop an action plan to address findings and achieve five-year performance targets. The Bureau of Public Transportation works with each transit system, providing technical assistance and monitoring progress on performance targets. Since January 21, 37 performance reviews have been conducted and 31 reports have been published on the Bureau s website. PennDOT continues to refine the process and best practices continue to emerge. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS To date, the following reports have been published: Cumberland Dauphin Harrisburg Transit Authority (CAT) March 21 Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation (FACT) March 211 Monroe County Transportation Authority (MCTA) July 211 Endless Mountains Transportation Authority (EMTA) August 211 Luzerne County Transportation Authority (LCTA) August 211 Luzerne County Transportation Authority Revised (LCTA) February 214 County of Lebanon Transit Authority (LT) November 211 Beaver County Transit Authority (BCTA) May 212 Altoona Metro Transit (AMTRAN) September 212 County of Lackawanna Transit System (COLTS) November 212 Venango County Transportation Office (VCTO) December 212 Cambria County Transit Authority (CamTran) January 213 Mid County Transit Authority March 213 DuBois, Falls Creek, Sandy Township Joint Transportation Authority (DuFAST) April 213 Pottstown Area Rapid Transit (PART) April 213 New Castle Area Transit Authority (NCATA) June 213 Centre Area Transportation Authority (CATA) September 213 City of Washington Transit December 213 Area Transportation Authority of North Central Pennsylvania (ATA) - May 214 Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority (MMVTA) - July 214 Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority (BARTA) - August 214 Crawford Area Transportation Authority (CATA) - August 214 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

13 PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Schuylkill Transportation System (STS) - August 214 Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority (EMTA) - October 214 PennDOT publishes transit agency performance review reports in their entirety on the Bureau of Public Transportation s website at The Department has committed to completing performance reviews on a five-year cycle. The remaining agencies are tentatively scheduled as follows, listed in anticipated chronological order: Williamsport River Valley Transit (RVT) - Review completed; Report not yet published Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) - Review completed; Report not yet published Mercer County Regional Council of Governments (MCRCOG) - Review completed; Report not yet published Transit Authority of Warren County (TAWC) - Review completed; Report not yet published South Central Transit Authority (SCTA) / Red Rose Transit Authority (RRTA) - Review completed; Report not yet published Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) - Review completed; Report not yet published The following section includes executive summaries for the performance reviews of: Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority (LANta) - June 215 Butler Transit Authority (BTA) - August 215 York Adams Transportation Authority (YATA) - August 215 Carbon County Community Transit (CCCT) - September 215 Westmoreland County Transit Authority (WCTA) - November 215 Lower Anthracite Transit System (LATS) - February 216 Hazleton Public Transit (HPT) - March 216 Indiana County Transit Authority (IndiGO) - March Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

14 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year PERFORMANCE REVIEWS

15 LANta Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Agency Name Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority (LANta) Transit Performance Review Executive Summary Agency Profile Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority (d.b.a. LANta) Year Founded 1972 Reporting Fiscal Year End (FYE) FYE 213 Service Area (square miles) 16 Service Area Population 389, Annual Operating Statistics Fixed-Route Bus Paratransit (Shared Ride + ADA) Vehicles in Maximum Service (VOMS) Operating Cost $2,545,39 $9,845,312 Operating Revenues $4,624,779 $6,654,47 Total (Actual) Vehicle Miles* 2,783,936 4,78,868 Revenue Miles of Service (RVM) 2,586,388 4,285,7 Total Vehicle Hours 234, ,968 Revenue Vehicle Hours (RVH) 219, ,932 Total Passenger Trips 4,877, ,584 Senior Passenger (Lottery) Trips 81,99 131,228 Act 44 Performance Statistics Passengers / RVH Operating Cost / RVH $93.45 $37.59 Operating Revenue / RVH $21.3 $25.41 Operating Cost / Passenger $4.21 $23.46 Other Performance Statistics Operating Revenue / Operating Cost 22.51% 67.59% Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Hours $87.67 $34.55 Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Miles $7.38 $2.9 Total Passengers / Total Vehicle Hours Operating Cost / RVM $7.94 $2.3 RVM / Total Vehicle Miles 92.9% 92.% RVH / Total Vehicle Hours 93.82% 91.92% 6 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

16 LANta Performance Review In July 27 the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 44, establishing a framework for a PennDOT driven transit agency performance review process. The purpose of a review is to assess efficiency and effectiveness of service, financial stability, and general management/business practices. The assessment makes transit agencies aware of improvement opportunities and identifies best practices that can be shared with other transit agencies. The Act 44 transit performance review of the Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority (d.b.a. LANta) was conducted in November 214. The performance review focused on fixed-route bus service. This report addresses Act 44 established performance criteria specifically related to fixed-route bus services - LANta trends and a comparison of LANta to peers, targets for future performance (performance reviews are conducted on a five-year cycle), and opportunities for improvement which should assist LANta in meeting the future targets. This report also addresses the management and general efficiency and effectiveness of services. After receipt of this performance review report, LANta will develop an action plan which identifies the steps LANta will take to meet the agreed to Act 44 performance criteria targets by FY The general goals are to maximize efficiency and promote cost savings, improve service quality, and increase ridership and revenue. The action plan should focus on the most critical areas for the agency, as prioritized by LANta management and its governing board. A draft action plan is due to the Department within 9 days of receipt of the report. PennDOT will work with LANta to agree to a plan which, when approved by the LANta Board, will be submitted as the final action plan. At the very least, LANta must report quarterly to the Board and PennDOT on the progress of the action plan, identifying actions taken to date, and actions to be implemented. LANta s success will be measured in part on meeting performance targets established through the review. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Act 44 Performance Determination Act 44 performance factors were analyzed to quantify LANta s fixed-route bus performance in comparison to its peer agencies in Fiscal Year End (FYE) 212 and over a five year trend period from FYE 27 to FYE 212 (the most recent NTD data available at the time of the peer selection). Peers were selected through an analytical process and were agreed to in advance by LANta. A transit agency s performance can fall into two categories: In Compliance or At Risk. The following criteria are used to make the determination: At Risk if more costly than one standard deviation above the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Passenger At Risk if performing worse than one standard deviation below the peer average in Single-year and five-year trend for Passengers / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Revenue / Revenue Vehicle Hour If the agency falls outside of these prescribed boundaries, it is considered At Risk for that factor and must improve as agreed upon between PennDOT and the agency. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

17 LANta Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS An analysis of the eight key criteria mandated by Act 44 was conducted and it was determined that LANTA is In Compliance for seven criteria and At Risk for one. The peer comparison process as applied to Act 44 criteria (below, in bold typeface) revealed the following: In Compliance FYE 212 passengers / revenue vehicle hour ranks 5th out of the 13 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. The five-year trend of passengers / revenue vehicle hour is worse than the peer group average. This is due to a decrease in ridership that followed a fare increase and service changes that occurred in the fall of 211. The FYE 212 operating cost / revenue vehicle hour ranks 9th out of the 13 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. The five-year trend for increase in operating cost / revenue vehicle hour is slightly worse than the peer group average. FYE 212 operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour ranks 5th out of the 13 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. The five-year trend for operating revenue/ revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. FYE 212 operating cost / passenger ranks 6th out of the 13 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. At Risk The five-year trend for operating cost / passenger is than worse than the peer group average. This is due to a decrease in ridership that followed a fare increase and service changes that took place in the fall of 211. A summary of the specific Act 44 measures and their values are presented in the following table. Performance Criteria Passengers / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Revenue Hour Determination Rank (of 13) Comparison to Peer Avg. Value Peer Average 212 In Compliance 5 Better Trend In Compliance 12 Worse -4.65%.17% 212 In Compliance 9 Worse $93.8 $89.5 Trend In Compliance 6 Worse 2.61% 2.11% Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Passenger 212 In Compliance 5 Better $21.55 $19.9 Trend In Compliance 8 Better 3.3% 2.19% 212 In Compliance 6 Better $4.18 $4.97 Trend At Risk 12 Worse 7.61% 2.12% 8 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

18 LANta Performance Review General Findings In accordance with Act 44, findings are indicated as Opportunities for Improvement or Best Practices. Improvement opportunities identify tasks that may be undertaken to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of the agency. Best practices are current practices that enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of LANta and may be shared with other agencies as techniques for improvement. Major themes are indicated below. Best Practices PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Regularly evaluating and adjusting multi-ride pass prices to maintain effective fare recovery Establishing route guarantee arrangements with Amazon, Penn State, a Community College and the Allentown Parking Authority Self-insuring for healthcare resulting in lower than industry average increase in annual healthcare costs Keeping scheduled overtime to 5% or less and carefully managing unscheduled overtime Recommending transit friendly site design guidelines that can be used by local governments through its Transit Supportive Land Use for the Lehigh Valley Receiving funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development Sustainable Communities program to support planning and support transit oriented development policies Rotating the Chairman of the Board between Lehigh and Northampton counties to bring fresh ideas to governance and greater buy-in to the decision-making Using automated passenger counters (APC) to inform service planning by providing the exact location and time of passenger boardings and alightings Opportunities for Improvement to Address in the Action Plan Develop a long-term strategy to increase cash reserves and move away from credit-based financing Review the payment terms of future shared-ride service delivery contracts to try to better align the way it compensates contractors with how it receives payments for shared-ride service Evaluate the implications of BRT on overall operating costs to determine the long-term fiscal impacts of the proposed service Reassess organizational structure to see if there are cost-effective ways to better distribute responsibilities and provide greater depth of resources for routine administrative functions Integrate conversion to CNG fueled vehicles into five-year capital and operating plans Establish a process for conducting routine customer satisfaction surveys Coordinate with PennDOT staff to find a way to account for LANTA Flex Service consistently in its dotgrants and NTD reporting Establish a citizen advisory committee to provide community input to service planning and other agency actions Explore opportunities to centrally manage its facilities maintenance records electronically Work with the Lehigh and Northampton counties to ensure that the Board s makeup is more reflective of the community makeup Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

19 LANta Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Financial Review Lehigh and Northampton county governments contribute monies to help cover LANTA s operational funding requirements. Per PennDOT dotgrants, LANTA has used most of those amounts to balance its budget and comply with state requirements. The total of fixed-route farebox, route guarantee and contract revenues as a percentage of operating cost is similar to that in similar-sized transit systems in the Commonwealth hovering between 2% and 23%. Fixed-route full fares are $2. and transfers are $.25. The effective fare is around $1. per trip. Management actively monitors and adjusts multi-ride pass pricing to maintain farebox recovery. LANTA has low cash reserves but can use a line of credit for its day-to-day cash flow needs. However, the practice of using a line of credit leads to increases in operating cost. LANTA management should continue to take appropriate actions to control costs, rebuild cash reserves and avoid using its line of credit for day-to -day cash flow needs. Five-Year Performance Targets This transit agency performance report outlines areas where improvements may be made in order to enhance the overall quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transit system. As a result of the performance review, a set of performance targets has been established and detailed on page 16. These performance targets are required to comply with Act 44 performance criteria and represent the minimum performance levels that LANTA should work to achieve during the next review cycle (i.e., five years from the date of this report). These performance targets were created using historical data analyzed during the fiveyear trend analysis as well as the most current audited PennDOT dotgrants information available (FYE 213). Standards were extrapolated to FYE 219 and are designed to be aggressive, yet achievable. They are summarized as follows: Performance Criteria 211* Actual Fiscal Year End (FYE) Actual Unaudited 219 Target Target Annual Increase Passengers / Revenue Hour % Operating Cost / Revenue Hour $95.88 $93.8 $93.45 $ % Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour $24.17 $21.55 $21.3 $ % Operating Cost / Passenger $3.41 $4.18 $4.21 $ % *LANTA had a major service change and a day pass fare increase in the fall of 211 that impacted all Act 44 performance criteria in FYE 212 and future years. 1 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

20 LANta Performance Review Next Steps Upon final transmission of the performance review report, Act 44 regulations stipulate that LANta shall develop and submit to the Department within 9 days a strategic action plan that focuses on continually improving the system to achieve the established minimum performance targets. The action plan should outline corrective action that will be taken to address Opportunities for Improvement as prioritized by the LANta oversight board and management. Functional area opportunities for improvement are areas in which adjustments may result in cost savings, improved service quality, and ridership and/or revenue increases. Achieved improvements in these areas will assist in meeting the performance targets by directly addressing areas that affect Act 44 performance criteria. It should be noted that many functional areas are interrelated, and the action plan should establish a comprehensive program that focuses on actions that address the larger issues within LANta. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS The template for the Action Plan has been provided as an appendix to the final report. This template includes two parts: Part 1- Act 44 Performance Metric Findings Templates is where LANta should address its proposed actions to address the Opportunities for Improvement findings that directly affect the Act 44 performance metrics. Part 2- Other Actions to Improve Overall Performance Template should be used to address the Other Findings that Impact Overall Agency Performance identified during the review. LANta should use the format provided in Appendix A: Action Plan Improvement Strategies to develop its proposed draft Action Plan. It should be noted that specific actions identified may only partially address the broadly noted opportunities for improvement found in the General Findings. Some actions will be quickly implementable while others may take several discrete steps to achieve over a longer period of time. The template provides a simple-tofollow order of key findings. LANta must select, prioritize and schedule its intended actions using the template. LANta must submit the proposed draft Action Plan using the format provided in Appendix A: Action Plan Improvement Strategies to the Department for comment. The proposed draft Action Plan may then be revised based on consultation between LANta s management and the Department. The finalized Action Plan then must be approved by the LANta Board and formally submitted to PennDOT. At the very least, LANta s management must report quarterly to the Board and the Department on progress towards accomplishing the Action Plan including actions taken in the previous quarter and actions planned for upcoming quarter(s). Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

21 BTA Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Agency Profile Agency Name Butler Transit Authority (BTA) Transit Performance Review Executive Summary Butler Transit Authority (d.b.a. BTA) Year Founded 1989 Reporting Fiscal Year End (FYE) FYE 213 Service Area (square miles) 15 Service Area Population 33,339 Annual Operating Statistics Fixed-Route Bus ADA Paratransit Vehicles in Maximum Service (VOMS) 4 Subcontracted Operating Cost $1,677,37 $11,641 Operating Revenues $192,61 $1,19 Total (Actual) Vehicle Miles* 216,574 6,739 Revenue Miles of Service (RVM) 212,29 6,739 Total Vehicle Hours** 18, Revenue Vehicle Hours (RVH) 17, Total Passenger Trips 217, Senior Passenger (Lottery) Trips 45,65 Act 44 Performance Statistics Passengers / RVH Operating Cost / RVH $94.6 $6.63 Operating Revenue / RVH $1.8 $6.2 Operating Cost / Passenger $7.71 $13.99 Other Performance Statistics Operating Revenue / Operating Cost 11.48% 1.22% Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Hours $9.89 $6.63 Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Miles $7.74 $1.73 Total Passengers / Total Vehicle Hours Operating Cost / RVM $7.9 $1.73 RVM / Total Vehicle Miles 98.2% 1.% RVH / Total Vehicle Hours % Source: PennDOT dotgrants 213 reporting *BTA reported total fixed-route vehicle mileage was estimated due to some odometer equipment failures and misunderstanding of revenue vs. total reporting requirements by BTA. **BTA reported fixed-route bus total vehicle hours are from Rural NTD reports. 12 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

22 BTA Performance Review In July 27 the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 44, establishing a framework for a PennDOT driven transit agency performance review process. The purpose of a review is to assess efficiency and effectiveness of service, financial stability, and general management/business practices. The assessment identifies best practices that can be shared with other transit agencies and makes transit agencies aware of improvement opportunities. The Act 44 transit performance review of Butler Transit Authority (d.b.a. BTA) was conducted in December 214. The performance review focused on fixed-route bus. This report addresses Act 44 established performance criteria specifically related to fixed-route bus services: BTA trends and a comparison of BTA to peers, targets for future performance (performance reviews are conducted on a five-year cycle), and opportunities for improvement which should assist BTA in meeting the future targets. This report also addresses the management and general efficiency and effectiveness of services. After receipt of this performance review report, BTA will develop an action plan which identifies the steps BTA will take to meet the agreed to Act 44 performance criteria targets by FY The general goals are to maximize efficiency and promote cost savings, improve service quality, and increase ridership and revenue. The action plan should focus on the most critical areas for the agency, as prioritized by BTA management and its governing board. A draft action plan is due to the Department within 9 days of receipt of the report. PennDOT will work with BTA to agree to a plan which, when approved by the BTA Board, will be submitted as the final action plan. At the very least, BTA must report quarterly to the Board and PennDOT on the progress of the action plan, identifying actions taken to date, and actions to be implemented. BTA s success will be measured in part on meeting performance targets established through the review. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Act 44 Performance Determination Act 44 performance factors were analyzed to quantify BTA s fixed-route bus performance in comparison to its peer agencies in Fiscal Year End (FYE) 212 and over a five year trend period from FYE 27 to FYE 212 (the most recent NTD data available at the time of the peer selection). Peers were selected through an analytical process and were agreed to in advance by BTA. A transit agency s performance can fall into two categories: In Compliance or At Risk. The following criteria are used to make the determination: At Risk if more costly than one standard deviation above the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Passenger At Risk if performing worse than one standard deviation below the peer average in Single-year and five-year trend for Passengers / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Revenue / Revenue Vehicle Hour If the agency falls outside of these prescribed boundaries, it is considered At Risk for that factor and must improve as agreed upon between PennDOT and the agency. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

23 BTA Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS An analysis of the eight key criteria mandated by Act 44 was conducted and it was determined that BTA is In Compliance for seven criteria and At Risk for one. The peer comparison process as applied to Act 44 criteria (below, in bold typeface) revealed the following: In Compliance FYE 212 passengers / revenue vehicle hour ranks 3rd out of the 11 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. The five-year trend of passengers / revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. The five-year trend for increase in operating cost / revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. FYE 212 operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour ranks 4th out of the 11 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. The five-year trend for operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour is worse than the peer group average. FYE 212 operating cost / passenger ranks 6th out of the 11 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. The five-year trend for operating cost / passenger increase is better than the peer group average. At Risk FYE 212 operating cost / revenue vehicle hour is the most expensive of the 11 transit agencies of the peer group. A summary of the specific Act 44 measures and their values are presented in the following table. Performance Criteria Determination Rank (of 11) Comparison to Peer Avg. Value Peer Average Passengers / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Revenue Hour Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Passenger 212 In Compliance 3 Better Trend In Compliance 6 Better 1.23%.99% 212 At Risk 11 Worse $87.18 $63.91 Trend In Compliance 5 Better 1.79% 2.8% 212 In Compliance 4 Better $9.6 $8.18 Trend In Compliance 9 Worse -.46% 2.79% 212 In Compliance 6 Better $6.41 $8.58 Trend In Compliance 5 Better.55% 1.1% 14 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

24 BTA Performance Review General Findings In accordance with Act 44, findings are indicated as best practices or opportunities for improvement. Best practices are current practices that enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of BTA and may be shared with other agencies as techniques for improvement. Improvement opportunities identify tasks that may be undertaken to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of the agency. Best Practices PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Active use of automated vehicle location (AVL) to assess on-time performance and for customer service Close coordination with the local MPO to secure funding for capital projects Use of website and social media as primary instruments in marketing Adopting, then adapting, procurement manual materials from peer agencies Coordinated vehicle purchases with other Pennsylvania transit systems Partnership with Slippery Rock University to evaluate on-time performance for all bus routes Outsourcing of grant writing services in a cost effective manner Use of Transportation Options/Transportation 11 forums to receive community and agency comments and suggestions Sale of tokens to social service agencies Opportunities for Improvement to Address in the Action Plan Address shortcomings of current subcontracting practices including RFP development, basis of contractor payment and overall contract management Conduct periodic formal Board training using resources available from PennTRAIN Develop a formal strategic plan that is adopted by the Board Publish Board meeting agendas and minutes online to promote transparency and to inform citizens of agency activities Conduct a structured, well-documented annual review of the Executive Director Develop formal succession plans for all key positions Ensure that preventative maintenance (PM) on BTA vehicles is conducted within + / - 1% of manufacturers recommended service schedules Develop performance targets for key agency functions Adjust service planning to include a realistic assessment of operating resources available to support the proposed commuter service to Pittsburgh and coordinate with Myers Coach and NCATA to avoid duplication of service Develop procedures to ensure that capital project plans are accompanied by realistic operating cost budgets and make sure that adequate funding is in place to support the increased long-term operating costs as well as the short-term capital costs Refine approach to tracking revenue miles and hours of service used in Act 44 operating formula Explore the potential of having a designated, separate and secured money counting room Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

25 BTA Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Develop and implement a formal annual driver evaluation process where drivers are evaluated and provided feedback on important aspects of their duties such as customer service, safety, etc. Adopt a formal protocol for customer complaint handling and follow up that encourages accountability, and has clear, but not redundant, responsibilities for BTA and its contractor Financial Review Butler City and Butler Township contribute monies for BTA s local match funding requirements. BTA has no outstanding debt or line of credit. BTA has a balanced operating budget. BTA projections of service levels and budgets indicate that BTA plans to maintain a balanced budget over the next five years. Capital and operating budget projections do not account for the potential addition of commuter service into Pittsburgh. BTA had $17,462 available in state 1513 carryover funds and $284,28 in local carryover funds at the end of FYE 213. This amounts to state reserves equal to 1.1% of BTA s annual operating cost. By the end of FYE 214, state and local carryover subsidies had decreased to $16,118 and $246,572 respectively. BTA management should continue to take appropriate actions such as controlling costs and increasing carryover reserves to improve BTA s overall financial health. Five-Year Performance Targets The transit agency performance report outlines areas where improvements may be made to enhance the overall quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transit system. As a result of the performance review, a set of performance targets have been established and detailed below. These performance targets are required to comply with Act 44 and represent minimum performance levels that BTA should work to achieve for each Act 44 performance criteria during the next review cycle (i.e., five years from the date of the report). These performance targets were created using historical data analyzed during the first five-year trend analysis as well as the most current unaudited PennDOT dotgrants information available (FYE 215). Standards were extrapolated to FYE 22 and are designed to be aggressive, yet achievable. They are summarized as follows: Performance Criteria 213 Actual Fiscal Year End (FYE) Actual Unaudited 22 Target Target Annual Increase Passengers / Revenue Hour % Operating Cost / Revenue Hour $94.6 $1.26 $ $ % Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour $1.8 $1.51 $12.83 $ % Operating Cost / Passenger $7.71 $8.17 $9.26 $ % 16 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

26 BTA Performance Review Next Steps Upon final transmission of the performance review report, Act 44 regulations stipulate that BTA shall develop and submit to the Department within 9 days a strategic action plan that focuses on continually improving the system to achieve the established minimum performance targets. The action plan should outline corrective action that will be taken to address Opportunities for Improvement as prioritized by the BTA oversight board and management. Functional area Opportunities for Improvement are areas in which improvement may result in cost savings, improved service quality, and ridership and/or revenue increases. Improvements in these areas will assist in the achievement of the performance targets by directly addressing areas that affect Act 44 performance criteria. It should be noted that many functional areas are interrelated, and the action plan should establish a comprehensive program that focuses on actions that address the larger issues within BTA. The template for the Action Plan is provided in the Appendix of the report. This template includes two parts: PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Part 1 - Act 44 Performance Metric Findings Template is where BTA should address its proposed actions to address the Opportunities for Improvement findings that directly affect the Act 44 performance metrics. Part 2 - Other Actions to Improve Overall Performance Templates should be used to address the Other Findings that Impact Overall Agency Performance identified during the review Some actions will be quickly implementable while others may take several discrete steps to achieve over a longer period of time. The template provides a simple-to-follow order of key findings. BTA must select, prioritize and schedule its intended actions using the template. BTA must submit the proposed draft Action Plan using the format provided in Appendix A: Action Plan Improvement Strategies to the Department for comment. The proposed draft Action Plan may then be revised based on consultation between BTA management and the Department. The finalized Action Plan then must be approved by the BTA Board and formally submitted to PennDOT. Subsequently, BTA management must report at least quarterly to the Board and the Department on progress towards accomplishing the Action Plan including actions taken in the previous quarter and actions planned for coming quarter(s). Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

27 YATA Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Agency Profile Agency Name York Adams Transportation Authority (YATA) Transit Performance Review Executive Summary York Adams Transportation Authority (d.b.a. YATA, rabbittransit, rabbitexpress, Freedom Transit) Year Founded* 1974 Reporting Fiscal Year End (FYE) FYE 214 Service Area (square miles) 911 Service Area Population 381,751 Annual Operating Statistics Fixed-Route Bus Paratransit (Shared Ride + ADA) Vehicles in Maximum Service (VOMS) 5 72 Operating Cost $1,48,824 $4,497,668 Operating Revenues $1,819,53 $1,989,172 Total (Actual) Vehicle Miles 1,711,74 2,33,617 Revenue Miles of Service (RVM) 1,633,65 1,721,76 Total Vehicle Hours 136, ,44 Revenue Vehicle Hours (RVH) 125,626 1,25 Total Passenger Trips 1,684, ,9 Senior Passenger (Lottery) Trips 174,154 11,482 Act 44 Performance Statistics Passengers / RVH Operating Cost / RVH $79.99 $44.97 Operating Revenue / RVH $14.48 $19.89 Operating Cost / Passenger $5.97 $18.98 Other Performance Statistics Operating Revenue / Operating Cost 18.1% 44.23% Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Hours $73.52 $39.44 Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Miles $5.87 $2.21 Total Passengers / Total Vehicle Hours Operating Cost / RVM $6.15 $2.61 RVM / Total Vehicle Miles 95.44% 84.66% RVH / Total Vehicle Hours 91.92% 87.71% Source: PennDOT dotgrants 214 reporting *YATA was originally founded in 1974 as York Area Transportation Authority. In 199, it was renamed the York County Transportation Authority (YCTA). In 211, YCTA merged with Adams County Transportation Authority to become the York Adams Transportation Authority. 18 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

28 YATA Performance Review In July 27 the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 44, establishing a framework for a PennDOT driven transit agency performance review process. The purpose of a review is to assess efficiency and effectiveness of service, financial stability, and general management/business practices. The assessment makes transit agencies aware of improvement opportunities and identifies best practices that can be shared with other transit agencies. The Act 44 transit performance review of York Adams Transportation Authority (d.b.a. YATA) was conducted in November 214. The performance review focused on fixed-route bus service. This report addresses Act 44 established performance criteria specifically related to fixed-route bus services YATA trends and a comparison of YATA to peers, targets for future performance (performance reviews are conducted on a five-year cycle), and opportunities for improvement which should assist YATA in meeting the future targets. This report also addresses the management and general efficiency and effectiveness of services. After receipt of this performance review report, YATA will develop an action plan which identifies the steps YATA will take to meet the agreed to Act 44 performance criteria targets by FY The general goals are to maximize efficiency and promote cost savings, improved service quality, and increased ridership and revenue. The action plan should focus on the most critical areas for the agency, as prioritized by YATA management and its governing board. A draft action plan is due to the Department within 9 days of receipt of the report. PennDOT will work with YATA to agree on a plan which, when approved by YATA Board, will be submitted as the final action plan. YATA must report at least quarterly to the Board and PennDOT on the progress of the action plan, identifying actions taken to date, and actions to be implemented. YATA s success will be measured in part on meeting performance targets established through this review. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Act 44 Performance Determination Act 44 performance factors were analyzed to quantify YATA s fixed-route bus performance in comparison to its peer agencies in Fiscal Year End (FYE) 213 and over a five year trend period from FYE 28 to FY 213 (the most recent NTD data available at the time of the peer selection). Peers were selected through an analytical process and were agreed to in advance by YATA. A transit agency s performance can fall into two categories: In Compliance or At Risk. The following criteria are used to make the determination: At Risk if more costly than one standard deviation above the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Passenger At Risk if worse than one standard deviation below the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Passengers / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Revenue / Revenue Vehicle Hour Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

29 YATA Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS An analysis of the eight key criteria mandated by Act 44 was conducted and it was determined that YATA is In Compliance for seven of the eight criteria and At Risk for one. The peer comparison process as applied to Act 44 criteria (below, in bold typeface) revealed the following: In Compliance 1. The five-year trend of passengers / revenue hour is worse than the peer group average. This is explained, in part, by recent expansions in commuter and rural transit service both of which typically have lower boardings per hour than urban systems. 2. FYE 213 operating cost / revenue vehicle hour ranks 5th out of 15 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. 3. The five-year trend for increase in operating cost / revenue vehicle is worse than the peer group average. However, it averaged only 3.16% per year, a sustainable value. 4. FYE 213 operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour ranks 11th out of the 15 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 5. The five-year trend for operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour is worse than the peer group average. 6. FYE 213 operating cost / passenger ranks 12th out of the 15 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group. 7. The five-year trend for operating cost / passenger is worse than the peer group average. At Risk 1. FYE 213 passengers / revenue vehicle hour ranks as the lowest of the transit agencies within the peer group. This is somewhat attributable to YATA providing rural fixed-route and commuter service, both of which have lower than average boardings / revenue hour than traditional urban fixed-route service. A summary of the specific Act 44 measures and their values are presented in the following table. Performance Criteria Fiscal Year End Determination Rank (of 15) Comparison to Peer Avg. Value Peer Average Passengers / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Revenue Hour Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Passenger 213 At Risk 15 Worse Trend In Compliance 12 Worse -1.9%.11% 213 In Compliance 5 Better $78.81 $91.68 Trend In Compliance 12 Worse 3.16% 1.37% 213 In Compliance 11 Worse $14.64 $18.96 Trend In Compliance 14 Worse -.25% 2.37% 213 In Compliance 12 Worse $5.73 $5.19 Trend In Compliance 12 Worse 4.3% 1.36% 2 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

30 YATA Performance Review General Findings In accordance with Act 44, findings are indicated as Opportunities for Improvement or Best Practices. Improvement opportunities identify tasks that may be undertaken to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of the agency. Best practices are current practices that enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of YATA and may be shared with other agencies as techniques for improvement. Major themes are indicated below; detailed recommendations on how these and more detailed issues identified should be addressed are found in the body of the report. Best Practices 1. Implementing an action plan to improve performance on distressed routes, based on empirical data that looks at on-time performance, safety, drivers/operators, congestion, start/stop times, vehicles and ridership 2. Performing quarterly ride checks to help management identify and address safety hazards along routes to reduce accidents 3. Using AVL to monitor the impact of adjusting schedules to improve on-time performance 4. Restructuring the collective bargaining agreement to eliminate all long-term liabilities 5. Using a callback feature on YATA s phone system to manage peak call volume 6. Updating the strategic plan every three years and conducting Board retreats every two years 7. Using sensitivity training to help drivers learn how to manage difficult customers 8. Developing a formal recruitment and selection guide for hiring drivers 9. Promoting an agency-wide culture of employee and customer safety Opportunities for Improvement 1. Develop procedures to ensure that future capital project plans are accompanied by sustainable operating budgets 2. Submit applications and invoices for projects/grants in a timely manner 3. Identify a capital financing / cash flow management strategy during construction of the new Zarfoss facility 4. Develop strategies to minimize the use of federal funding to subsidize operating costs 5. Explore opportunities to improve on-time performance (OTP) through changes in schedules, routes or modification of dwell times 6. Develop mechanisms to track and report maintenance trends 7. Reevaluate organization of management team to establish clear job descriptions and lines of responsibility 8. Modify customer complaint handling procedures to automatically follow up with customers 9. Develop a strategic IT plan 1. Expand marketing plan to include metrics such as expected benefits, costs and a complete budget by marketing effort 11. Perform a benefit/cost analysis to assess the potential of installing registering fareboxes in vehicles stored at rural satellite locations PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

31 YATA Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 12. Continue to seek ways to ensure Board makeup reflects demographic makeup of the community 13. Find effective ways to ensure employees at satellite locations can provide feedback to management team 14. Develop formal protocols to conduct routine emergency response training with all employees at all satellite locations Financial Review York and Adams Counties, as well as the Wareheim and Gettysburg Foundations contribute monies to satisfy YATA s local match funding requirement. YATA currently has a balanced operating budget though it is heavily reliant on the use of federal funds for operations. YATA projections of service levels indicate that YATA plans to maintain a balanced budget through the use of carryover funds. YATA had $2,35,939 available in state 1513 carryover funds and $753,138 in local carryover funds at the end of FYE 213. This amounts to state reserves equal to 17.2% of YATA s annual operating cost. By the end of FYE 214, state carryover subsidies decreased to $2,179,619 and local carryover subsidies increased to $881,77 respectively. YATA s 5 year operating budget projection indicates that it will deplete all federal, state and local carryover funds by FYE 219. Management should continue to take appropriate actions to control costs, achieve farebox recovery goals, and sustain cash reserves to maintain YATA s overall financial health. Five-Year Performance Targets This transit agency performance report outlines areas where improvements may be made to enhance the overall quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transit system. As a result of the performance review, a set of performance targets has been established and detailed below. These performance targets are required to comply with Act 44 and represent minimum performance levels that YATA should work to achieve for each Act 44 performance criteria during the next review cycle (i.e., five years from the date of this report). These performance targets were created using historical data analyzed during the five-year trend analysis as well as the most current audited PennDOT dotgrants information available (FYE 214). Standards were extrapolated to FYE 22 and are designed to be aggressive, yet achievable. They are summarized as follows: Performance Criteria 212 Actual Fiscal Year End (FYE) 213 Actual 214 Actual 219 Target Target Annual Increase Passengers / Revenue Hour % Operating Cost / Revenue Hour $75.14 $78.81 $79.99 $ % Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour $13.69 $14.64 $14.48 $ % Operating Cost / Passenger $5.75 $5.73 $5.97 $ % 22 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

32 YATA Performance Review Next Steps Upon final transmission of the performance review report, Act 44 regulations stipulate that YATA shall develop and submit to the Department within 9 days a strategic action plan that focuses on continually improving the system to achieve the established minimum performance targets. The action plan should outline corrective action that will be taken to address Opportunities for Improvement as prioritized by the YATA oversight board and management. Functional area Opportunities for Improvement are areas in which improvement may result in cost savings, improved service quality, and ridership and/or revenue increases. Improvements in these areas will assist in the achievement of the performance targets by directly addressing areas that affect Act 44 performance criteria. It should be noted that many functional areas are interrelated, and the action plan should establish a comprehensive program that focuses on actions that address the larger issues within YATA. The template for the Action Plan has been provided as an Appendix to the full report. This template includes two parts: PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Part 1- Act 44 Performance Metric Findings Template is where YATA should address its proposed actions to address the Opportunities for Improvement findings that directly affect the Act 44 performance metrics Part 2- Other Actions to Improve Overall Performance Templates should be used to address the Other Findings that Impact Overall Agency Performance identified during the review Some actions will be quickly implementable while others may take several discrete steps to achieve over a longer period of time. The template provides a simple-to-follow order of key findings. YATA must select, prioritize and schedule its intended actions using the template. YATA must submit the proposed draft Action Plan using the format provided in Appendix A: Action Plan Improvement Strategies of the full report to the Department for comment. The proposed draft Action Plan may then be revised based on consultation between YATA s management and the Department. The finalized Action Plan then must be approved by the YATA Board and formally submitted to PennDOT. Subsequently, YATA management must report at least quarterly to the Board and the Department on progress towards accomplishing the Action Plan including actions taken in the previous quarter and actions planned for coming quarter(s). Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

33 CCCT Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Agency Profile Agency Name Carbon County Community Transit (CCCT) Transit Performance Review Executive Summary Carbon County Community Transit (d.b.a. CCCT, The Lynx) Reporting Fiscal Year End (FYE) FYE 213 Annual Operating Statistics Fixed-Route Bus Paratransit (Shared Ride + ADA) Vehicles in Maximum Service (VOMS) 1 15 Operating Cost $11,744 $1,965,374 Operating Revenues $1,394 $1,765,375 Total (Actual) Vehicle Miles 34,9 854,485 Revenue Miles of Service (RVM) 33, ,5 Total Vehicle Hours 2,8 37,474 Revenue Vehicle Hours (RVH) 1,78 36,45 Total Passenger Trips 6,11 62,148 Senior Passenger (Lottery) Trips 4,725 31,93 Act 44 Performance Statistics Passengers / RVH Operating Cost / RVH $57.16 $53.92 Operating Revenue / RVH $.78 $48.43 Operating Cost / Passenger $16.68 $31.62 Other Performance Statistics Operating Revenue / Operating Cost 1.37% 89.82% Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Hours $48.92 $52.45 Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Miles $2.92 $2.3 Total Passengers / Total Vehicle Hours Operating Cost / RVM $3.7 $2.88 RVM / Total Vehicle Miles 95.% 79.99% RVH / Total Vehicle Hours 85.58% 97.27% Source: PennDOT dotgrants 213 reporting 24 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

34 CCCT Performance Review In July 27 the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 44, establishing a framework for a PennDOT driven transit agency performance review process. The purpose of a review is to assess efficiency and effectiveness of service, financial stability, and general management/business practices. The assessment makes transit agencies aware of improvement opportunities and identifies best practices that can be shared with other transit agencies. The Act 44 transit performance review of Carbon County Community Transit (d.b.a. CCCT) was conducted in November 214. The performance review focused on fixed-route bus. This report addresses Act 44 established performance criteria specifically related to fixed-route bus services CCCT trends and a comparison of CCCT to peers, targets for future performance (performance reviews are conducted on a five -year cycle), and opportunities for improvement which should assist CCCT in meeting the future targets. This report also addresses the management, general efficiency and effectiveness of services. After receipt of this performance review report, CCCT will develop an action plan which identifies the steps CCCT will take to meet the agreed to Act 44 performance criteria targets by FY The general goals are to maximize efficiency and promote cost savings, improved service quality, and increased ridership and revenue. The action plan should focus on the most critical areas for the agency, as prioritized by CCCT management and its governing board. A draft action plan is due to the Department within 9 days of receipt of this report. PennDOT will work with CCCT to agree on a plan which, when approved by CCCT Board, will be submitted as the final action plan. CCCT must report at least quarterly to the Board and PennDOT on the progress of the action plan, identifying actions taken to date, and actions to be implemented. CCCT s success will be measured in part on meeting performance targets established through this review. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Act 44 Performance Determination Act 44 performance factors were analyzed to quantify CCCT s fixed-route bus performance in comparison to its peer agencies in Fiscal Year End (FYE) 213 and over a five-year trend period from FYE 27 to FYE 212 (the most recent NTD data available at the time of the peer selection). Peers were selected through an analytical process and were agreed to in advance by CCCT. A transit agency s performance can fall into two categories: In Compliance or At Risk. The following criteria are used to make the determination: At Risk if more costly than one standard deviation above the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Passenger At Risk if worse than one standard deviation below the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Passengers / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Revenue / Revenue Vehicle Hour If the agency falls outside of these prescribed boundaries, it is considered At Risk for that factor and must improve as agreed upon between PennDOT and the agency. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

35 CCCT Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS An analysis of the eight key criteria mandated by Act 44 was conducted and it was determined that CCCT is In Compliance for all eight of the eight criteria and At Risk for none. The peer comparison process as applied to Act 44 criteria (below, in bold typeface) revealed the following: In Compliance 1. FYE 212 passengers / revenue vehicle hour ranks 5th of the 7 transit agencies in the peer group and is worse than the peer group average. 2. The five-year trend of passengers / revenue vehicle hour is worse than average, is declining steeply, and ranks 6th out of the 7 transit agencies in the peer group. 3. FYE 212 operating cost / revenue vehicle hour is better than average and ranks as the 3rd least costly of the 7 peer agencies. 4. The five-year trend for operating cost / revenue vehicle hour is better than average and ranks 3rd best of the 7 transit agencies in the peer group. 5. FYE 212 operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour is the lowest of the peer group. 6. The five-year trend for operating revenue/ revenue vehicle hour ranks at number 1 and is much better than the peer group average. 7. FYE 212 operating cost / passenger is the 4th highest of the peer group and is lower than the peer group average. 8. The five-year trend for operating cost / passenger is very close to the peer group average and ranks 5th out of the 7 transit agencies. At Risk 1. None. A summary of the specific Act 44 measures and their values are presented in the following table. Performance Criteria Fiscal Year End Determination Rank (of 7) Comparison to Peer Avg. Value Peer Average Passengers / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Revenue Hour Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Passenger 212 In Compliance 5 Worse Trend In Compliance 6 Worse -5.35% -3.1% 212 In Compliance 3 Better $55.69 $71.63 Trend In Compliance 3 Better 2.17% 4.2% 212 In Compliance 7 Worse $1.5 $4.45 Trend In Compliance 1 Better 1.42% 1.13% 212 In Compliance 4 Better $12.2 $14.3 Trend In Compliance 5 Worse 7.95% 7.94% 26 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

36 CCCT Performance Review General Findings In accordance with Act 44, findings are indicated as Opportunities for Improvement or Best Practices. Improvement opportunities identify tasks that may be undertaken to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of the agency. Best practices are current practices that enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of CCCT and may be shared with other agencies as techniques for improvement. Major themes are indicated below; detailed recommendations on how these and more detailed issues identified should be addressed are found in the body of the report. Best Practices 1. Incorporating performance standards into shared-ride service delivery contracts including minimum passenger trips per hour (productivity) and financial incentives for productivity exceeding minimum standards 2. Outsourcing management of its operations given the size of CCCT s service 3. Coordinating with LANta on joint procurement opportunities Opportunities for Improvement to Address in Part 1 of the Action Plan 1. Define clearly the governance roles, responsibilities and reporting expectations between the Carbon County Board of Commissioners, LANta s Board and management 2. Designate a county staff member to oversee and report to the Commission on CCCT performance 3. Develop a comprehensive strategic plan that includes a comprehensive marketing plan and budget, a formal set of performance goals and a regular report on agency performance for review by the Carbon County Commission, and an assessment of the effectiveness of fixed-ride service and adjust CCCT service to better meet customer needs 4. Create a transit development plan (TDP) to improve fixed-route service and ridership 5. Promote the new CCCT website from the County website and make a link available from the LANta website homepage 6. Explore the potential of generating revenues from bus advertising 7. Assess the potential benefits and costs of adding cameras when purchasing new vehicles 8. Reduce or eliminate the need to use fixed-route funding to subsidize shared-ride service 9. Conduct a comprehensive assessment of CCCT s shared-ride service to identify potential cost saving strategies that could eliminate its operating loss and minimize the need for fare increases 1. Incorporate operating performance standards into future service delivery contracts Financial Review Carbon County contributes monies to the CCCT to help cover operational funding requirements. CCCT has used all of those amounts, in any given year, to balance its budget and comply with state requirements. Fixed-route farebox revenues as a percentage of operating cost is much lower than that in similar-sized transit systems in the Commonwealth, typically hovering between 1% and 2%. Actual fixed-route full fares are $1.5. Because the majority of passengers are seniors who ride free and there are few fare paying passengers, the result is a very low farebox recovery ratio. CCCT uses fixed-route subsidies from the USDOT, the County and from the Commonwealth to help cover a portion of the losses in its shared-ride operations. CCCT uses 74% of its fixed-route 1513 state funds to PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

37 CCCT Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS subsidize the shared-ride program. No other Pennsylvania transit system in the peer group used for the Act 44 comparison uses more than 3% of its fixed-route funds to subsidize shared-ride expenses, and most do not use any fixed-route funding for this purpose. This use of fixed-route funding to subsidize shared-ride service severely limits potential investments that could improve the performance of CCCT fixed-route service. CCCT s overall financial health is poor. This is largely attributable to losses in its shared-ride operations. Shared-ride operations account for approximately 95% of CCCT s total operating costs. CCCT s current liabilities exceed its current assets. This has been the case since at least 28. If CCCT were an independent transit authority, its situation would be dire. The reason it is not bankrupt is because it has a line of credit form Carbon County and unpaid monies due to LANta which has not forced collection. Furthermore, CCCT s fixed-route program will experience additional cost increases as operating costs are expected to rise by more than 3% in FYE 215 based on new contract terms with Easton Coach. Management should take appropriate actions to control costs, address losses in its shared-ride operation, and improve fixed-route farebox recovery so as to improve CCCT s overall financial health. Five-Year Performance Targets The transit agency performance report outlines areas where improvements may be made to enhance the overall quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transit system. As a result of the performance review, a set of performance targets has been established and detailed below. These performance targets are required to comply with Act 44 and represent minimum performance levels that CATA should work to achieve for each Act 44 performance criteria during the next review cycle (i.e., five years from the date of this report). These performance targets were created using historical data analyzed during the five-year trend analysis as well as the most current audited dotgrants information available (FYE 213). Standards were extrapolated to FYE 219 and are designed to be aggressive, yet achievable. They are summarized as follows: Performance Criteria 211 Actual Fiscal Year End (FYE) 212 Actual 213 Actual 219 Target Target Annual Increase Passengers / Revenue Hour % Operating Cost / Revenue Hour $54.85 $55.69 $57.16 $ % Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour $.9 $1.5 $.78 $1.5 5.% Operating Cost / Passenger $13.3 $12.2 $16.68 $ % 28 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

38 CCCT Performance Review Next Steps Upon final transmission of the performance review report, Act 44 regulations stipulate that CCCT shall develop and submit to the Department within 9 days a strategic action plan that focuses on continually improving the system to achieve the established minimum performance targets. The action plan should outline corrective action that will be taken to address Opportunities for Improvement as prioritized by the Carbon County Board of Commissioners and management. Functional area Opportunities for Improvement are areas in which improvement may result in cost savings, improved service quality, and ridership and/or revenue increases. Improvements in these areas will assist in the achievement of the performance targets by directly addressing areas that affect Act 44 performance criteria. It should be noted that many functional areas are interrelated, and the action plan should establish a comprehensive program that focuses on actions that address the larger issues within CCCT. The template for the Action Plan has been provided as an Appendix to the full report. This template includes two parts: PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Part 1- Act 44 Performance Metric Findings Template is where CCCT should address its proposed actions to address the Opportunities for Improvement findings that directly affect the Act 44 performance metrics. Part 2- Other Actions to Improve Overall Performance Template should be used to address the Other Findings that Impact Overall Agency Performance identified. Some actions will be quickly implementable while others may take several discrete steps to achieve over a longer period of time. The template provides a simple-to-follow order of key findings. CCCT must select, prioritize and schedule its intended actions using the template. CCCT must submit the proposed draft Action Plan using the format provided in Appendix A: Action Plan Improvement Strategies to the Department for comment. The proposed draft Action Plan may then be revised based on consultation between CCCT management and the Department. The finalized Action Plan then must be approved by the Carbon County Board of Commissioners and formally submitted to PennDOT. Subsequently, CCCT management must report at least quarterly to the Commissioners and the Department on progress towards accomplishing the Action Plan including actions taken in the previous quarter and actions planned for coming quarter(s). Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

39 WCTA Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Agency Profile Agency Name Westmoreland County Transit Authority (WCTA) Transit Performance Review Executive Summary Westmoreland County Transit Authority (d.b.a. WCTA) Reporting Fiscal Year End (FYE) FYE 214 Service Area (square miles) 668 Service Area Population 296,66 Annual Operating Statistics Fixed-Route Bus Paratransit (Shared Ride + ADA) Vehicles in Maximum Service (VOMS) Operating Cost $5,266,13 $6,33,395 Operating Revenues $1,519,437 $4,437,384 Total (Actual) Vehicle Miles 1,367,397 2,437,598 Revenue Miles of Service (RVM) 912,292 2,175,124 Total Vehicle Hours 61, ,973 Revenue Vehicle Hours (RVH) 45, ,266 Total Passenger Trips 547, ,57 Senior Passenger (Lottery) Trips 72, ,533 Act 44 Performance Statistics Passengers / RVH 12, Operating Cost / RVH $ $4.97 Operating Revenue / RVH $33.66 $3.13 Operating Cost / Passenger $9.62 $25.67 Other Performance Statistics Operating Revenue / Operating Cost 28.85% 73.55% Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Hours $85.97 $37.95 Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Miles $3.85 $2.48 Total Passengers / Total Vehicle Hours Operating Cost / RVM $5.77 $2.77 RVM / Total Vehicle Miles 66.72% 89.23% RVH / Total Vehicle Hours 73.69% 92.64% Source: PennDOT dotgrants 214 reporting 3 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

40 WCTA Performance Review In July 27 the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 44, establishing a framework for a PennDOT driven transit agency performance review process. The purpose of a review is to assess efficiency and effectiveness of service, financial stability, and general management/business practices. The assessment makes transit agencies aware of improvement opportunities and identifies best practices that can be shared with other transit agencies. The Act 44 transit performance review of Westmoreland County Transit Authority (d.b.a. WCTA) was conducted in March 215. The performance review focused on fixed-route bus. This report addresses Act 44 established performance criteria specifically related to fixed-route bus services WCTA trends and a comparison of WCTA to peers, targets for future performance (performance reviews are conducted on a five-year cycle), and opportunities for improvement which should assist WCTA in meeting the future targets. This report also addresses the management, general efficiency and effectiveness of services. After receipt of this performance review report, WCTA will develop an action plan which identifies the steps WCTA will take to meet the agreed to Act 44 performance criteria targets by FY The general goals are to maximize efficiency and promote cost savings, improve service quality, and increase ridership and revenue. The action plan should focus on the most critical areas for the agency, as prioritized by WCTA management and its governing board. A draft action plan is due to the Department within 9 days of receipt of this report. PennDOT will work with WCTA to agree on a plan which, when approved by the WCTA Board, will be submitted as the final action plan. WCTA must report at least quarterly to the Board and PennDOT on the progress of the action plan, identifying actions taken to date, and actions to be implemented. WCTA s success will be measured, in part, on meeting performance targets established through this review. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Act 44 Performance Determination Act 44 performance factors were analyzed to quantify WCTA s fixed-route bus performance in comparison to its peer agencies in Fiscal Year End (FYE) 213 and over a five year trend period from FYE 28 to FYE 213 (the most recent NTD data available at the time of the peer selection). Peers were selected through an analytical process and were agreed to in advance by WCTA. A transit agency s performance can fall into two categories: In Compliance or At Risk. The following criteria are used to make the determination: At Risk if more costly than one standard deviation above the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Passenger At Risk if worse than one standard deviation below the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Passengers / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Revenue / Revenue Vehicle Hour If the agency falls outside of these prescribed boundaries, it is considered At Risk for that factor and must improve as agreed upon between PennDOT and the agency. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

41 WCTA Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS An analysis of the eight key criteria mandated by Act 44 was conducted and it was determined that WCTA is In Compliance for seven of the eight criteria and At Risk for one. The peer comparison process as applied to Act 44 criteria (below, in bold typeface) revealed the following: In Compliance 1. FYE 213 passengers / revenue vehicle hours ranks 8th out of the 13 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 2. The five-year trend of passengers / revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. 3. The five-year trend for increase in operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour is much worse than the peer group average. 4. FYE 213 operating revenue / revenue vehicle hours ranks 3rd out of the 13 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. 5. The five-year trend for operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. This is due to an increase in commuter ridership following a rise in parking rates for the City of Pittsburgh. 6. FYE 213 operating cost / passenger ranks 1th out of the 13 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 7. The five-year trend for operating cost / passenger is better than the peer group average. At Risk 1. FYE 213 operating cost / revenue vehicle hour ranks 13th out of the 13 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. This is due, in part, to significant deadhead on returning commuter routes and increased costs from deferred maintenance for the fixed-route fleet. A summary of the specific Act 44 measures and their values are presented in the following table. Performance Criteria Fiscal Year End Determination Rank (of 13) Comparison to Peer Avg. Value Peer Average Passengers / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Revenue Hour Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Passenger 213 In Compliance 8 Worse Trend In Compliance 5 Better 4.85% 3.37% 213 At Risk 13 Worse $ $82.24 Trend In Compliance 8 Worse 3.46% 2.33% 213 In Compliance 3 Better $3.33 $2.72 Trend In Compliance 5 Better 8.55% 5.78% 213 In Compliance 1 Worse $9.13 $7.24 Trend In Compliance 7 Better -1.32% -.62% 32 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

42 WCTA Performance Review General Findings In accordance with Act 44, findings are indicated as Opportunities for Improvement or Best Practices. Improvement opportunities identify tasks that may be undertaken to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of the agency. Best practices are current practices that enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of WCTA and may be shared with other agencies as techniques for improvement. Best Practices 1. Use of an Interoperability Agreement increases WCTA market presence in the Greater Pittsburgh area 2. Maintains open communication with the service contractor with weekly meetings that discuss service issues, review driver complaints, and conduct occasional maintenance walkthroughs 3. Administrative staff takes a proactive role in contractor oversight and reporting 4. WCTA fixed-route fleet is directly linked to local emergency services for an improved response time PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Opportunities for Improvement 1. Strategize and determine how to tackle the significant deadhead from commuter routes. 2. Consider limiting ADA service to only.75 mile of fixed-route service through Westmoreland County, and an expansion of PwD for certain trips outside the ADA service area 3. Explore ways to align shared-ride costs with shared-ride revenues 4. Develop a prioritized fixed-stop system that matches current service demands, inform passengers of transfer locations, and provide an accessible online system map 5. Develop online trip planning services 6. Expand WCTA range of service metrics to include transit variables for future performance monitoring of fixed-route service 7. Establish performance standards to measure and evaluate current practices 8. Update WCTA transit development plan to demonstrate agency responsiveness to service needs for transit in Westmoreland County 9. Develop a quality control program for outsourcing maintenance needs 1. Coordinate a partnership with PAAC for large-scale repairs and heavy maintenance needs 11. Utilize PennDOT provided PennTRAIN board training 12. Form standing Board Committees and meet quarterly 13. Create attendance requirements for Board participation 14. Establish a formal annual performance review process for the Executive Director Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

43 WCTA Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 15. Develop formal succession plan for all key positions 16. Update WCTA strategic plan every five years 17. Develop comprehensive marketing plan 18. Ensure drivers receive formal customer service training 19. Develop and implement a formal annual driver evaluation process 2. Revisit the transfer facility design and evaluate alternative departures scenarios 21. Look into vehicle refurbishment and corrective actions to correct rust damage and prevent further deterioration 22. Coordinate with the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (SPC) for transportation planning Financial Review Westmoreland County and 32 Westmoreland municipalities contribute monies for WCTA s local match funding requirements. Per PennDOT dotgrants, WCTA has a balanced operating budget. WCTA projections of service levels and budget indicate that WCTA plans to maintain a balanced budget over the next five years. WCTA had $1,7,429 in state 1513 carryover funds and $87,6 in local carryover funds at the end of FYE 213. This amounts to state reserves equal to 33.1% of WCTA s annual operating cost. By the end of 214, state and local carryover subsidies had increased to $1,148,591 and $86,12 respectively. Management should continue to take appropriate actions to control costs, achieve farebox recovery goals, and sustain cash reserves to maintain WCTA s overall financial health. Five-Year Performance Targets This transit agency performance report outlines areas where improvements may be made to enhance the overall quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transit system. As a result of the performance review, a set of performance targets has been established and detailed below. These performance targets are required to comply with Act 44 and represent minimum performance levels that WCTA should work to achieve for each Act 44 performance criteria during the next review cycle (i.e., five years from the date of this report). These performance targets were created using historical data analyzed during the five-year trend analysis as well as the most current audited dotgrants information available (FYE 214). Standards were extrapolated to FYE 22 and are designed to be aggressive, yet achievable. They are summarized as follows: Performance Criteria 212 Actual Fiscal Year End (FYE) 213 Actual 214 Actual 22 Target Target Annual Increase Passengers / Revenue Hour % Operating Cost / Revenue Hour $ $ $ $ % Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour $24.63 $3.33 $33.66 $ % Operating Cost / Passenger $9. $9.13 $9.62 $ % 34 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

44 WCTA Performance Review Next Steps Upon final transmission of the performance review report, Act 44 regulations stipulate that WCTA shall develop and submit to the Department within 9 days a strategic action plan that focuses on continually improving the system to achieve the established minimum performance targets. The action plan should outline corrective action that will be taken to address Opportunities for Improvement as prioritized by the WCTA oversight board and management. Functional area Opportunities for Improvement are areas in which improvement may result in cost savings, improved service quality, and ridership and/or revenue increases. Improvements in these areas will assist in the achievement of the performance targets by directly addressing areas that affect Act 44 performance criteria. It should be noted that many functional areas are interrelated, and the action plan should establish a comprehensive program that focuses on actions that address the larger issues within WCTA. The template for the Action Plan has been provided as an Appendix to the full report. This template includes two parts: PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Part 1- Act 44 Performance Metric Findings Templates is where WCTA should address its proposed actions to address the Opportunities for Improvement findings that directly affect the Act 44 performance metrics Part 2- Other Actions to Improve Overall Performance Templates should be used to address the Other Findings that Impact Overall Agency Performance identified during the review. Some actions will be quickly implementable while others may take several discrete steps to achieve over a longer period of time. The template provides a simple-to-follow order of key findings. WCTA must select, prioritize and schedule its intended actions using the template. WCTA must submit the proposed draft Action Plan using the format provided in Appendix A: Action Plan Improvement Strategies to the Department for comment. The proposed draft Action Plan may then be revised based on consultation between WCTA management and the Department. The finalized Action Plan then must be approved by the WCTA Board and formally submitted to PennDOT. Subsequently, WCTA management must report at least quarterly to the Board and the Department on progress towards accomplishing the Action Plan including actions taken in the previous quarter and actions planned for coming quarter(s). Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

45 LATS Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Agency Profile Agency Name Lower Anthracite Transit Authority (LATS) Transit Performance Review Executive Summary Lower Anthracite Transit Authority (d.b.a. LATS) Year Founded 1982 Reporting Fiscal Year End (FYE) FYE 215 Service Area (square miles) 56 Service Area Population 33, Annual Operating Statistics Fixed-Route Bus Vehicles in Maximum Service (VOMS) 3 Operating Cost $29,371 Operating Revenues $11,567 Total (Actual) Vehicle Miles 72,498 Revenue Miles of Service (RVM) 61,273 Total Vehicle Hours 5,624 Revenue Vehicle Hours (RVH) 5,58 Total Passenger Trips 29,25 Senior Passenger (Lottery) Trips 13,13 Act 44 Performance Statistics Passengers / RVH 5.77 Operating Cost / RVH $57.41 Operating Revenue / RVH $2.29 Operating Cost / Passenger $9.94 Other Performance Statistics Operating Revenue / Operating Cost 3.98% Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Hours $51.63 Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Miles $4.1 Total Passengers / Total Vehicle Hours 5.19 Operating Cost / RVM $4.74 RVM / Total Vehicle Miles 84.52% RVH / Total Vehicle Hours 89.94% Source: PennDOT dotgrants 215 reporting 36 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

46 LATS Performance Review In July 27 the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 44, establishing a framework for a PennDOT driven transit agency performance review process. The purpose of a review is to assess efficiency and effectiveness of service, financial stability, and general management/business practices. The assessment identifies best practices that can be shared with other transit agencies and makes transit agencies aware of improvement opportunities. The Act 44 transit performance review of the Lower Anthracite Transit System (d.b.a. LATS) was conducted in August 215. The performance review focused on fixed-route bus service. This report addresses the performance criteria that Act 44 established, specifically related to fixed-route bus services. Also addressed are, LATS trends and a comparison of LATS to peers, targets for future performance, and opportunities for improvement which should assist LATS in meeting the future targets. This report also addresses the management, general efficiency and effectiveness of services. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS On the basis of this performance report, LATS will develop an action plan that identifies the steps LATS will take to meet the agreed to Act 44 performance criteria targets by FY The general goals are to maximize efficiency and promote cost savings, improved service quality, and increased ridership and revenue. The action plan should focus on the most critical areas for the agency, as prioritized by LATS management and its governing board. A draft action plan is due to the Department within 9 days of receipt of this report. PennDOT will work with LATS to agree on a plan which, when approved by the LATS governing body, the Borough Council, will be submitted as the final action plan. At the very least, LATS must report quarterly to the Borough Council and PennDOT on the progress of the action plan, identifying actions taken to date, and actions to be implemented. LATS success will be measured in part on meeting performance targets established through this review. Background When interpreting LATS historical trends, there are two important issues to be considered. First, PennDOT made adjustments to LATS state funding based on overstated senior and total ridership from FYE 26 through FYE 212. Senior and total ridership are two components used in the allocation of state funding for the section 1513 Operating Assistance and section 1517 Capital Improvement Programs. As a result, in August of 214, LATS had to repay $229,111 of section 1513 and $34,398 of section 1517 funds. Reported passenger values in this report for FYE 212 and before are based on revised estimates developed by the Department. Second, LATS procured a new operations contractor in 214 based on suspicion that the former contractor had been overbilling LATS for services provided. The contract with the new operator is at a much lower cost per hour of service than the former, causing a large variance in LATS historical cost trends. Act 44 Performance Determination Act 44 performance factors were analyzed to quantify LATS fixed-route bus performance in comparison to its peer agencies in Fiscal Year End (FYE) 213 and over a five-year trend period from FYE 28 to FYE 213 (the most recent NTD data available at the time of the peer selection). Peers were selected through an Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

47 LATS Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS analytical process and were agreed to by LATS. A transit agency s performance can fall into two categories: In Compliance or At Risk. The following criteria are used to make the determination: At Risk if more costly than one standard deviation above the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Passenger At Risk if performing worse than one standard deviation below the peer average in Single-year and five-year trend for Passengers / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Revenue / Revenue Vehicle Hour If the agency falls outside of these prescribed boundaries, it is considered At Risk for that factor and must improve as agreed upon between PennDOT and the agency. An analysis of the eight key criteria mandated by Act 44 was conducted and it was determined that LATS is In Compliance for all eight criteria and At Risk for none. The peer comparison process as applied to Act 44 criteria (below, in bold typeface) revealed the following: In Compliance 1. FYE 213 passengers / revenue vehicle hour ranks 4th of the 7 transit agencies in the peer group and is worse than the peer group average. 2. The five-year trend of passengers / revenue vehicle hour is the best of the peer group average. 3. FYE 213 operating cost / revenue vehicle hour ranks 2nd out of the 7 agencies and is better than the peer group average. 4. The five-year trend for operating cost / revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. 5. FYE 213 operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour ranks 6th out of the 7 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 6. The five-year trend for operating revenue/ revenue vehicle hour is worse than the peer group average. 7. FYE 213 operating cost / passenger ranks 3rd out of the 7 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. 8. The five-year trend for operating cost / passenger is better than the peer group average. At Risk 1. None. A summary of the specific Act 44 measures and their values are presented in the following table. 38 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

48 LATS Performance Review Performance Criteria Passengers / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Revenue Hour Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour Determination Rank (of 11) Comparison to Peer Avg. Value Peer Average 213 In Compliance 4 Worse Trend In Compliance 1 Better 2.58% -3.6% 213 In Compliance 2 Better $51.85 $65.15 Trend In Compliance 1 Better -1.49%.43% 213 In Compliance 6 Worse $2.65 $5.35 Trend In Compliance 2 Better 9.9% 3.6% PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Operating Cost / Passenger 213 In Compliance 3 Better $1.77 $14.76 Trend In Compliance 1 Better % 4.12% General Findings In accordance with Act 44, findings are indicated as best practices or opportunities for improvement. Best practices are current practices that enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of LATS and may be shared with other agencies as techniques for improvement. Improvement opportunities identify tasks that may be undertaken to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of the agency. Best Practices Targeting the region s largest employer and developing a successful seasonal rider base Executive Director rides the routes on a weekly basis and actively engages passengers Opportunities for Improvement to Address in the Action Plan Coordinate with PennDOT to develop an ADA program that meets federal requirements Complete PennTRAIN Board training Provide monthly status briefings and report to the Borough Council Start the process for selecting the next contracted service contract well before the current contract is set to expire Develop protocols to monitor and report missed service Develop a marketing plan Improve oversight of contractor preventative maintenance practices Develop website that includes a system map, fares, route and schedule information Evaluate the potential of route guarantee funding with Knoebel s Amusement Resort Improve security for farebox revenue handling Routinely test and evaluate TDP recommendations Coordinate with the Borough of Mount Carmel to develop a succession plan Explore technical resource sharing opportunities with SEDA-COG Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

49 LATS Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Financial Review Northumberland County, the Borough of Mount Carmel, and the surrounding municipalities contribute monies for LATS local match funding requirements. LATS has no outstanding debt or line of credit. LATS has a balanced operating budget. LATS had $369,995 available in state 1513 carryover funds and $1,526 in local carryover funds at the end of FYE 214. This amounts to state reserves equal to 112.4% of LATS annual operating expenses. By the end of FYE 215, state carryover subsides had decreased to $146,624 and local carryover subsidies had decreased to $4,844. During FYE 215, LATS 1513 reserves decreased greatly. This was because in August of 214, PennDOT adjusted LATS state funding for section 1513 Operating Assistance and section 1517 Capital Improvement Programs. The adjustments were necessary due to LATS overstating their senior citizen passenger counts from fiscal year 25-6 through The funding adjustments resulted in LATS repaying $229,111 of section 1513 funding and $34,398 of section 1517 funding. In order to maintain overall financial health, LATS management should continue to take appropriate actions to control costs, achieve farebox recovery goals and build cash reserves. Five-Year Performance Targets This transit agency performance report outlines areas where improvements may be made to enhance the overall quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transit system. As a result of the performance review, a set of performance targets has been established. These performance targets are required to comply with Act 44 performance criteria and represent the minimum performance levels that LATS should work to achieve during the next review cycle (i.e., five years from the date of this report). These performance targets were created using historical data analyzed during the five-year trend analysis as well as the most current unaudited PennDOT dotgrants information available (FYE 215). Standards were extrapolated to FYE 22 and are designed to be aggressive, yet achievable. They are summarized as follows: Performance Criteria 213 Actual Fiscal Year End (FYE) Actual Unaudited 22 Target Target Annual Increase Passengers / Revenue Hour % Operating Cost / Revenue Hour $51.85 $65.97 $57.41 $ % Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour $2.65 $2.33 $2.29 $ % Operating Cost / Passenger $1.77 $11.58 $9.94 $ % 4 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

50 LATS Performance Review Next Steps Upon final transmission of the performance review report, Act 44 regulations stipulate that LATS shall develop and submit to the Department within 9 days a strategic action plan that focuses on continually improving the system to achieve the established minimum performance targets. The action plan should outline corrective action that will be taken to address Opportunities for Improvement as prioritized by the LATS oversight council and management. Functional area opportunities for improvement are areas in which improvement may result in cost savings, improved service quality, and ridership and/or revenue increases. Achieved improvements in these areas will assist in the meeting performance targets by directly addressing areas that affect Act 44 performance criteria. It should be noted that many functional areas are interrelated, and the action plan should establish a comprehensive program that focuses on actions that address the larger issues within LATS. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS An Action Plan template is provided as an appendix to this report. This template is where LATS should address its proposed actions to address the Opportunities for Improvement findings that directly affect the Act 44 performance metrics. Some actions will be quickly implementable while others may take several discrete steps to achieve over a longer period of time. The template provides a simple-to-follow order of key findings. LATS must select, prioritize and schedule its intended actions using the template. LATS must submit the proposed draft Action Plan to the Department for comment. The proposed draft Action Plan may then be revised based on consultation between LATS management and the Department. The finalized Action Plan must be approved by the LATS Borough Council and formally submitted to PennDOT. LATS management must report quarterly to the Borough Council and the Department on progress towards accomplishing the Action Plan including actions taken in the previous quarter and actions planned for upcoming quarter(s). Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

51 HPT Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Agency Profile Agency Name City of Hazleton Hazleton Public Transit (HPT) Transit Performance Review Executive Summary City of Hazleton Hazleton Public Transit (d.b.a. HPT) Year Founded 1982 Reporting Fiscal Year End (FYE) FYE 214 Service Area (square miles) 144 Service Area Population 58,43 Annual Operating Statistics Fixed-Route Bus Paratransit (Shared Ride + ADA) Vehicles in Maximum Service (VOMS) 8 4 Operating Cost $2,196,453 $351,974 Operating Revenues $221,468 $34,152 Total (Actual) Vehicle Miles 375,767 77,959 Revenue Miles of Service (RVM) 375,767 54,337* Total Vehicle Hours 28,865 8,682* Revenue Vehicle Hours (RVH) 28,865 6,52* Total Passenger Trips 217,52 11,862 Senior Passenger (Lottery) Trips 64,187 Act 44 Performance Statistics Passengers / RVH Operating Cost / RVH $76.9 $58.16 Operating Revenue / RVH $7.67 $5.64 Operating Cost / Passenger $1.1 $29.67 Other Performance Statistics Operating Revenue / Operating Cost 1.8% 9.7% Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Hours $76.9 $4.54 Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Miles $5.85 $4.51 Total Passengers / Total Vehicle Hours Operating Cost / RVM $5.85 $6.48 RVM / Total Vehicle Miles 1.% 69.7% RVH / Total Vehicle Hours 1.% 69.71% Source: PennDOT dotgrants 214 reporting *Values reported in dotgrants are incorrect. Paratransit RVM reported did not exclude deadhead and RVH reported is Live Miles. Estimated values are used in this summary. 42 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

52 HPT Performance Review In July 27 the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 44, establishing a framework for a PennDOT driven transit agency performance review process. The purpose of a review is to assess efficiency and effectiveness of service, financial stability, and general management/business practices. The assessment identifies best practices that can be shared with other transit agencies and makes transit agencies aware of improvement opportunities. The Act 44 transit performance review of the Hazleton Public Transit (d.b.a. HPT) was conducted in September 2-3rd, 215. The performance review focused on fixed-route bus service. This report addresses the performance criteria that Act 44 established, specifically related to fixed-route bus service. Also addressed are, HPT trends and comparisons with HPT peers, targets for future performance, and opportunities for improvement that should assist HPT in meeting the future targets. This report also addresses the management, general efficiency and effectiveness of services. On the basis of this performance report, HPT will develop an action plan which identifies the steps HPT will take to meet the agreed upon Act 44 performance criteria targets by FY The general goals are to maximize efficiency and promote cost savings, maximize service quality, and maximize ridership and revenue. The action plan should focus on the most critical areas for the agency, as prioritized by HPT s management and its governing board. A draft action plan is due to the Department within 9 days of receipt of this report. PennDOT will work with HPT to agree on a plan which, when approved by the HPT Board, will be submitted as the final action plan. HPT must report quarterly to the Board and PennDOT on the progress of the action plan, identifying actions taken to date, and actions to be implemented. HPT s success will be measured in part on meeting performance targets established through this review. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Act 44 Performance Determination Act 44 performance factors were analyzed to quantify HPT s fixed-route bus performance in comparison to its peer agencies in Fiscal Year End (FYE) 213 and over a five-year trend period from FYE 28 to FYE 213 (the most recent NTD data available at the time of the peer selection). Peers were selected through an analytical process and were agreed to in advance by HPT. A transit agency s performance can fall into two categories: In Compliance or At Risk. The following criteria are used to make the determination: At Risk if more costly than one standard deviation above the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Passenger At Risk if worse than one standard deviation below the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Passengers / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Revenue / Revenue Vehicle Hour If the agency falls outside of these prescribed boundaries, it is considered At Risk for that factor and must improve as agreed upon between PennDOT and the agency. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

53 HPT Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS An analysis of the eight key criteria mandated by Act 44 was conducted and it was determined that HPT is In Compliance for three criteria and At Risk for five. The peer comparison process as applied to Act 44 criteria (below, in bold typeface) revealed the following: In Compliance 1. FYE 213 operating cost / revenue vehicle hour ranks 12th out of the 14 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 2. FYE 213 operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour ranks 1th out of the 14 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 3. The five-year trend for operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. This is due, in part, to rents collected starting in 21. At Risk 1. FYE 213 passengers / revenue vehicle hour ranks 13th out of the 14 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 2. The five-year trend of passengers / revenue vehicle hour is worse than the peer group average. 3. The five-year trend for increase in operating cost / revenue vehicle hour is worse than the peer group average. 4. FYE 213 operating cost / passenger ranks 14th out of the 14 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 5. The five-year trend for operating cost / passenger is worse than the peer group average. A summary of the specific Act 44 measures and their values are presented in the following table. Performance Criteria Fiscal Year End Determination Rank (of 14) Comparison to Peer Avg. Value Peer Average Passengers / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Revenue Hour Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Passenger 213 At Risk 13 Worse Trend At Risk 13 Worse -3.1% 1.52% 213 In Compliance 12 Worse $76.39 $63.55 Trend At Risk 13 Worse 5.47% 2.49% 213 In Compliance 1 Worse $7.23 $1.8 Trend In Compliance 3 Better 7.8% 1.74% 213 At Risk 14 Worse $1.15 $5.55 Trend At Risk 14 Worse 8.85% 1.8% 44 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

54 HPT Performance Review General Findings In accordance with Act 44, findings are indicated as best practices or opportunities for improvement. Best practices are current practices that enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of HPT and may be shared with other agencies as techniques for improvement. Improvement opportunities identify tasks that may be undertaken to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and /or quality of service of the agency. Best Practices 1. Use of a secure third party site for farebox reconciliation, assists in oversight of farebox revenue verification 2. Use of fleet cards to track and monitor fuel consumption 3. Coordination of major maintenance repairs with LCTA and STS 4. Coordinates pooled procurement purchases with RRTA and STS Opportunities for Improvement to Address in Action Plan 1. Develop a TDP to address decline in ridership 2. Complete PennTRAIN Board Training 3. Develop a routine status report covering ridership, farebox recovery, changes in operational costs and customer service 4. Calibrate fleet APCs to verify manual rider counts 5. Require contractors to maintain a well-organized system for PM recordkeeping 6. Develop an OTP goal for PM, and monitor and track progress 7. Develop a strategic marketing plan 8. Develop a strategic IT plan 9. Coordinate with Lackawanna/Luzerne MPO for mapping tools and non-rider data Financial Review Luzerne County is the sole contributor for local money for HPT s public transportation funding requirements. HPT has no outstanding debt or line of credit, and currently has a balanced operating budget. HPT projections of service levels and budget indicate that HPT plans to maintain a balanced budget over the next five years. HPT had $2,487,92 in 1513 carryover funds available, and $552,31 in local carryover funds at the end of FYE 213. By the end of FYE 214, HPT had $2,77,954 available state carryover subsidies and local carryover subsides had decreased slightly to $551,879. In FYE 215, HPT was not approved for local match by Luzerne County, and had to rely on local subsidy reserves to meet 1513 match requirements. HPT was approved for local match by Luzerne County for FYE 216, but was only approved for operating match without additional funds for capital projects. HPT will continue to request local match from Luzerne County, but believes that only operating subsidies will be approved in future requests until local subsidy reserves are depleted. HPT will need to take appropriate actions to control costs, achieve farebox recovery goals, and maintain adequate cash reserves to sustain HPT s overall financial health. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

55 HPT Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Five-Year Performance Targets This transit agency performance report outlines areas where improvements may be made to enhance the overall quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transit system. As a result of the performance review, a set of performance targets has been established. These performance targets are required to comply with Act 44 performance criteria and represent the minimum performance levels that HPT should work to achieve during the next review cycle (i.e., five years from the date of this report). These performance targets were created using historical data analyzed during the five-year trend analysis as well as the most current audited PennDOT dotgrants information available (FYE 214). Standards were extrapolated to FYE 22 and are designed to be aggressive, yet achievable. They are summarized as follows: Performance Criteria 212 Actual Fiscal Year End (FYE) 213 Actual 214 Actual 22 Target Target Annual Increase Passengers / Revenue Hour % Operating Cost / Revenue Hour $69.97 $76.39 $76.9 $ % Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour $7.23 $7.23 $7.67 $ % Operating Cost / Passenger $8.69 $1.15 $1.1 $1.1.% Next Steps Upon final transmission of the performance review report, Act 44 regulations stipulate that HPT shall develop and submit to the Department within 9 days a strategic action plan that focuses on continually improving the system to achieve the established minimum performance targets. The action plan should outline corrective action that will be taken to address Opportunities for Improvement as prioritized by the HPT oversight board and management. Functional area opportunities for improvement are areas in which adjustments may result in cost savings, improved service quality, and ridership and/or revenue increases. Achieved improvements in these areas will assist in meeting the performance targets by directly addressing areas that affect Act 44 performance criteria. It should be noted that many functional areas are interrelated, and the action plan should establish a comprehensive program that focuses on actions that address the larger issues within HPT. The template for the Action Plan has been provided as an appendix to this report. This template is where HPT should address its proposed actions to address the Opportunities for Improvement findings that directly affect the Act 44 performance metrics. Some actions will be quickly implementable while others may take several discrete steps to achieve over a longer period of time. The template provides a simple-tofollow order of key findings. HPT must select, prioritize and schedule its intended actions using the template. HPT must submit the proposed draft Action Plan using the format provided to the Department for comment. The proposed draft Action plan may then be revised based on consultation between HPT s management and the Department. The finalized Action Plan then must be approved by the Mayor of Hazleton and formally submitted to PennDOT. At the very least, HPT s management must report on a quarterly basis to the Mayor of Hazleton and the Department on progress towards accomplishing the Action Plan including 46 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

56 HPT Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS intentionally blank Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

57 IndiGO Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Agency Profile Agency Name Indiana County Transit Authority Transit Performance Review Executive Summary Indiana County Transit Authority (d.b.a. IndiGO) Year Founded 1979 Reporting Fiscal Year End (FYE) FYE 215 Service Area (square miles) 83 Service Area Population 89,994 Annual Operating Statistics Fixed-Route Bus Paratransit (Shared Ride + ADA) Vehicles in Maximum Service (VOMS) Operating Cost $2,17,213 $615,217 Operating Revenues $685,268 $46,716 Total (Actual) Vehicle Miles 48, ,78 Revenue Miles of Service (RVM) 393, ,484 Total Vehicle Hours 31,411 14,753 Revenue Vehicle Hours (RVH) 31,324 12,289 Total Passenger Trips 436,985 27,55 Senior Passenger (Lottery) Trips 12,53 23,498 Act 44 Performance Statistics Passengers / RVH Operating Cost / RVH $67.27 $5.6 Operating Revenue / RVH $21.88 $37.49 Operating Cost / Passenger $4.82 $22.74 Other Performance Statistics Operating Revenue / Operating Cost 32.52% 74.89% Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Hours $67.9 $41.7 Operating Cost / Total Vehicle Miles $5.15 $1.98 Total Passengers / Total Vehicle Hours Operating Cost / RVM $5.35 $2.38 RVM / Total Vehicle Miles 96.29% 83.9% RVH / Total Vehicle Hours 99.72% 83.3% Source: PennDOT dotgrants 215 reporting 48 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

58 IndiGO Performance Review In July 27 the Pennsylvania Legislature passed Act 44, establishing a framework for a PennDOT driven transit agency performance review process. The purpose of a review is to assess efficiency and effectiveness of service, financial stability, and general management/business practices. The assessment identifies best practices that can be shared with other transit agencies and makes transit agencies aware of improvement opportunities. The Act 44 transit performance review of the Indiana County Transit Authority (d.b.a. IndiGO) was conducted in September 29-3th, 215. The performance review focused on fixed-route bus service. This report addresses the performance criteria that Act 44 established, specifically related to fixed-route bus service. Also addressed are, IndiGO trends and comparisons with IndiGO peers, targets for future performance, and opportunities for improvement that should assist IndiGO in meeting the future targets. This report also addresses the management, general efficiency and effectiveness of services. On the basis of this performance report, IndiGO will develop an action plan which identifies the steps IndiGO will take to meet the agreed upon Act 44 performance criteria targets by FY (FYE 22). The general goals are to maximize efficiency and promote cost savings, maximize service quality, and maximize ridership and revenue. The action plan should focus on the most critical areas for the agency, as prioritized by IndiGO s management and its governing board. A draft action plan is due to the Department within 9 days of receipt of this report. PennDOT will work with IndiGO to agree on a plan which, when approved by the IndiGO Board, will be submitted as the final action plan. IndiGO management must report quarterly to the Board and PennDOT on the progress of the action plan, identifying actions taken to date, and actions to be implemented. IndiGO s success will be measured, in part, on meeting performance targets established through this review. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Act 44 Performance Determination Act 44 performance factors were analyzed to quantify IndiGO s fixed-route bus performance in comparison to its peer agencies in Fiscal Year End (FYE) 213 and over a five-year trend period from FYE 28 to FYE 213 (the most recent NTD data available at the time of the peer selection). Peers were selected through an analytical process and were agreed to in advance by IndiGO. A transit agency s performance can fall into two categories: In Compliance or At Risk. The following criteria are used to make the determination: At Risk if more costly than one standard deviation above the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Cost / Passenger At Risk if worse than one standard deviation below the peer group average in Single-year and five-year trend for Passengers / Revenue Vehicle Hour Single-year and five-year trend for Operating Revenue / Revenue Vehicle Hour If the agency falls outside of these prescribed boundaries, it is considered At Risk for that factor and must improve as agreed upon between PennDOT and the agency. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

59 IndiGO Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS An analysis of the eight key criteria mandated by Act 44 was conducted and it was determined that IndiGO is In Compliance for all eight criteria and At Risk for none. The peer comparison process as applied to Act 44 criteria (below, in bold typeface) revealed the following: In Compliance 1. FYE 213 passengers / revenue vehicle hour ranks 11 th out of the 14 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 2. The five-year trend of passengers / revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. 3. FYE 213 operating cost / revenue vehicle hour ranks 4 h out of the 14 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. 4. The five-year trend for change in operating cost / revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. 5. FYE 213 operating revenue / revenue vehicle hour ranks 3rd out of the 14 transit agencies and is better than the peer group average. 6. The five-year trend for operating revenue/ revenue vehicle hour is better than the peer group average. 7. FYE 213 operating cost / passenger ranks 7th out of the 14 transit agencies and is worse than the peer group average. 8. The five-year trend for operating cost / passenger is better than the peer group average. At Risk 1. None. Performance Criteria Fiscal Year End Determination Rank (of 14) Comparison to Peer Avg. Value Peer Average Passengers / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Revenue Hour Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour Operating Cost / Passenger 213 In Compliance 11 Worse Trend In Compliance 2 Better 4.2% 1.5% 213 In Compliance 4 Better $65.64 $79.86 Trend In Compliance 3 Better -.83% 1.55% 213 In Compliance 3 Better $17.74 $12.89 Trend In Compliance 1 Better 8.62% 2.21% 213 In Compliance 7 Worse $5.26 $5.3 Trend In Compliance 1 Better -4.66%.54% 5 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

60 IndiGO Performance Review General Findings In accordance with Act 44, findings are indicated as best practices or opportunities for improvement. Best practices are current practices that enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and/or quality of service of IndiGO and may be shared with other agencies as techniques for improvement. Improvement opportunities identify tasks that may be undertaken to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and /or quality of service of the agency. Best Practices 1. Instituted a fare policy that includes a targeted farebox recovery goal as one element to consider when setting fares 2. Negotiated a route guarantee from a private developer for service to a housing complex 3. Set up video cameras on all fixed-route and paratransit vehicles, and uses video footage for customer service as well as claim resolution 4. Video footage for all routes are randomly reviewed each month, and the results are compared to AVAIL data as a secondary method of verifying ridership 5. Established a vehicle overhaul (VOH) program that performs a benefit cost analysis on each vehicle to determine if it is worth extending useful life 6. Hired an independent CPA to perform quarterly reviews and a different CPA to conduct the annual audit 7. Appointed Board members from geographically diverse parts of Indiana County 8. Board members ride buses and interact with passengers and drivers 9. Customer service policy ensures that complaints are addressed personally and in a timely manner 1. Partnered with the Indiana County Emergency Management Agency to develop a local emergency management plan Opportunities for Improvement to Address in Action Plan 1. Expand marketing plan to include a budget tied to a schedule and a return on investment 2. Report on the progress of the strategic plan to the Board 3. Assess shared-ride program costs and fare pricing to identify strategies that recover more of the actual cost of shared-ride service 4. Develop a system map depicting all available service within Indiana County 5. Update the transit development plan (TDP) every five years to account for changes within the service area 6. Evaluate the potential of advertising on bus shelters where none currently exists to generate additional revenues 7. Develop an annual target for maintenance parts turnover 8. Expand annual evaluation of Executive Director to include measures directly tied to performance goals of the strategic plan 9. Develop a strategic IT plan to prioritize and guide IT investment decisions 1. Evaluate the potential of developing an internship program with IUP PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

61 IndiGO Performance Review PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Financial Review Indiana County contributes money for IndiGO s public transportation funding requirements. IndiGO has a $35, line of credit available, a balanced operating budget and no outstanding debt. IndiGO s operating budget projections indicate that IndiGO plans to maintain a balanced budget over the next five years. IndiGO had $65,62 in 1513 carryover funds available, and $173,151 in local carryover funds at the end of FYE 214. By the end of FYE 215, IndiGO had $78,887 in available state carryover subsidies and local carryover subsides had increased to $18,889. A projected annual increase of 8.% in operating costs reflect uncertainty in the projected cost of labor and fringe benefits. Management should take appropriate actions to control costs and achieve farebox recovery goals to maintain IndiGO s overall financial health. Five-Year Performance Targets This transit agency performance report outlines areas where improvements may be made to enhance the overall quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transit system. As a result of the performance review, a set of performance targets has been established. These performance targets are required to comply with Act 44 performance criteria and represent the minimum performance levels that IndiGO should work to achieve during the next review cycle (i.e., five years from the date of this report). These performance targets were created using historical data analyzed during the five-year trend analysis as well as the most current audited PennDOT dotgrants information available (FYE 215). Standards were extrapolated to FYE 22 and are designed to be aggressive, yet achievable. They are summarized as follows: Performance Criteria 213 Actual Fiscal Year End (FYE) 214 Actual 215 Actual 22 Target Target Annual Increase Passengers / Revenue Hour % Operating Cost / Revenue Hour $65.64 $64.78 $67.27 $ % Operating Revenue / Revenue Hour $17.74 $19.53 $21.88 $ % Operating Cost / Passenger $5.26 $4.55 $4.82 $ % In FYE 214, IndiGO received a one-time insurance rebate of $74,733. This amount has been removed from revenues and credited to offset (reduce) fixed-route operating costs. In FYE 215, IndiGO received a onetime alternative fuel rebate of $51,255 that reduced the cost of fuel and subsequently, overall operating costs. To account for the rebate, IndiGO s operating cost target has been set to a rate of 3.1% to more closely reflect operating costs in future years. 52 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

62 IndiGO Performance Review Next Steps Upon final transmission of the performance review report, Act 44 regulations stipulate that IndiGO shall develop and submit to the Department within 9 days a strategic action plan that focuses on continually improving the system to achieve the established minimum performance targets. The action plan should outline corrective action that will be taken to address Opportunities for Improvement as prioritized by the IndiGO oversight board and management. Functional area Opportunities for Improvement are areas in which adjustments may result in cost savings, improved service quality, and ridership and/or revenue increases. Achieved improvements in these areas will assist in meeting the performance targets by directly addressing areas that affect Act 44 performance criteria. It should be noted that many functional areas are interrelated, and the action plan should establish a comprehensive program that focuses on actions that address the larger issues within IndiGO. The template for the Action Plan, provided as an appendix to this report, is where IndiGO should address its proposed actions to address the Opportunities for Improvement findings that directly affect the Act 44 performance metrics. Some actions will be quickly implementable while others may take several discrete steps to achieve over a longer period of time. IndiGO must select, prioritize and schedule its intended actions using the template. IndiGO must submit the proposed draft Action Plan using the format provided in the appendix to the Department for comment. The proposed draft Action Plan may then be revised based on consultation between IndiGO s management and the Department. The finalized Action Plan then must be approved by the IndiGO Board and formally submitted to PennDOT. IndiGO s management must report quarterly to the Board and the Department on progress towards accomplishing the Action Plan including actions taken in the previous quarter and actions planned for upcoming quarter(s). PERFORMANCE REVIEWS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

63 PERFORMANCE REVIEWS intentionally blank 54 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

64 FORMULA FACTORS Section II Section 1513 Distribution Factors Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

65 Act 44 Passenger Trips TABLE 1 Total Act 44 Passenger Trip Statistics (Includes Senior Citizens) FORMULA FACTORS Agency Percent Changes vs Percent Changes vs SEPTA 336,549, ,388, % 329,314,635.% PAAC 62,288,879 62,57,941.4% 64,128,41 2.6% AMTRAN (Altoona) 687, , % 585, % BCTA (Beaver) 948, ,27-5.6% 925, % BARTA (Berks) 3,212,652 3,259, % 3,93, % CAMTRAN (Cambria) 1,29,35 1,23,87-4.6% 1,197, % CAT (Cumberland, Dauphin, Harrisburg) 2,75,281 2,696,66 -.3% 2,592,85-3.8% CATA (Centre) 7,126,185 7,399, % 7,379,79 -.3% COLTS (Lackawanna) 1,162,26 1,157, % 1,132, % COLT/LT (Lebanon) 292,478 31,51 6.2% 337, % EMTA (Erie) 3,378,642 3,274, % 3,355, % FACT (Fayette) 199,39 25, % 194, % HPT (Hazelton) 216, , % 221,88-3.6% LANTA (Lehigh, Northampton) 5,33,263 5,173,76 2.8% 5,55,36-2.3% LCTA (Luzerne) 1,193,93 1,28,83 1.3% 1,29,91.1% MMVTA (Mid Mon Valley) 34,55 34,361.1% 327, % POTTSTOWN 259,8 256, % 258,14.6% RRTA (Lancaster) 1,925,555 1,923,11 -.1% 1,958,6 1.8% MCRCOG (Mercer) 14,69 114, % 92, % WASHINGTON CITY 57,785 71, % 67, % WCTA (Westmoreland) 579, , % 541, % Williamsport RVT 1,358,876 1,318,32-3.% 1,36, % YATA (York, Adams) 1,583,49 1,699, % 1,68, % ATA (North Central) 43,438 44, % 426, % BTA (Butler) 218, , % 2, % CCCT (Carbon) 7,198 6, % 7, % CATA (Crawford 237,75 235, % 244, % DuFAST (Clearfield) 65,266 6,16-8.% 57, % EMTA (Endless Mountains) 125, , % 15, % ICTA (Indiana) 451, ,314 8.% 437, % MIDCO (Armstrong) 44,99 39, % 45, % MCTA (Monroe) 239, , % 243,11-1.6% BMC (Mount Carmel) 23,55 28, % 29,25 2.8% NCATA (New Castle) 624,77 616, % 593,43-3.7% STS (Schuykill) 217, ,25-2.4% 28,5-1.8% VCTO (Venango) 63,787 56, % 52, % TAWC (Warren) 72,229 7, % 65, % WASHCO (Washington County) 18,211 21, % 23, % Total 435,332, ,749,57-1.5% 429,739,59.2% 56 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

66 Act 44 Senior Citizen Trips TABLE 2 Total Act 44 Senior Citizens Trip Statistics Agency Percent Changes vs Percent Changes vs SEPTA 26,487,498 26,162,73-1.2% 25,757, % PAAC 4,878,315 4,799, % 4,812,63.3% AMTRAN (Altoona) 71,975 67, % 69, % BCTA (Beaver) 77,165 79,39 2.4% 79,777.9% BARTA (Berks) 465, ,12-2.2% 413, % CAMTRAN (Cambria) 257,314 27, % 164,71-2.9% CAT (Cumberland, Dauphin, Harrisburg) 211,7 22,74 4.6% 237,2 7.4% CATA (Centre) 41,399 42, % 49, % COLTS (Lackawanna) 27, , % 186, % COLT/LT (Lebanon) 53,759 59,69 1.9% 65, % EMTA (Erie) 184,7 175, % 171, % FACT (Fayette) 23,411 19, % 21, % HPT (Hazelton) 67,913 64, % 6, % LANTA (Lehigh, Northampton) 81,99 742, % 621, % LCTA (Luzerne) 211,9 214, % 194, % MMVTA (Mid Mon Valley) 41,742 37, % 35,35-5.2% POTTSTOWN 38,653 38,3-1.6% 4, % RRTA (Lancaster) 229, ,15-2.8% 23, % MCRCOG (Mercer) 2,476 16, % 15,246-6.% WASHINGTON CITY 9,114 1, % 8, % WCTA (Westmoreland) 72,34 72,967.9% 7, % Williamsport RVT 228,885 21,43-8.1% 186, % YATA (York, Adams) 149, , % 17, % ATA (North Central) 31,639 28,2-1.9% 26,14-7.4% BTA (Butler) 45,65 39, % 4,17 1.9% CCCT (Carbon) 4,725 3, % 4,89 2.9% CATA (Crawford 36,78 36, % 36,488.9% DuFAST (Clearfield) 24,586 21, % 19,56-8.3% EMTA (Endless Mountains) 11,437 12,55 9.3% 12, % ICTA (Indiana) 17,849 14, % 12, % MIDCO (Armstrong) 17,546 13, % 14, % MCTA (Monroe) 3,15 29,16-3.6% 26, % BMC (Mount Carmel) 12,589 14,3 11.4% 13,13-6.6% NCATA (New Castle) 81,2 75, % 8, % STS (Schuykill) 82,832 71, % 61, % VCTO (Venango) 11,482 1, % 1, % TAWC (Warren) 8,991 8, % 8, % WASHCO (Washington County) 7,97 8, % 8,416-2.% FORMULA FACTORS Total 35,253,48 34,678,44-1.6% 34,37, % Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

67 Act 44 Revenue Vehicle Miles TABLE 3 Total Act 44 Revenue Vehicle Miles Statistics FORMULA FACTORS Agency Percent Changes vs Percent Changes vs SEPTA 85,767,977 86,962,24 1.4% 86,858, % PAAC 25,45,897 25,542,475.5% 26,78, % AMTRAN (Altoona) 579,83 573, % 547, % BCTA (Beaver) 941,82 942,567.1% 917, % BARTA (Berks) 1,769,467 1,74, % 1,725, % CAMTRAN (Cambria) 1,25,18 1,75,75-1.8% 1,95, % CAT (Cumberland, Dauphin, Harrisburg) 1,878,61 1,851, % 1,861,128.5% CATA (Centre) 1,632,5 1,718, % 1,944, % COLTS (Lackawanna) 1,164,826 1,162, % 1,176, % COLT/LT (Lebanon) 5, ,25 3.2% 55,946-2.% EMTA (Erie) 2,191,75 2,21,816.9% 2,294, % FACT (Fayette) 546, , % 585, % HPT (Hazelton) 421, , % 436,38-3.8% LANTA (Lehigh, Northampton) 4,171,864 4,9,317-2.% 4,415,653 8.% LCTA (Luzerne) 1,134,185 1,146, % 1,166,92 1.8% MMVTA (Mid Mon Valley) 816, , % 783, % POTTSTOWN 294,2 277, % 267,93-3.4% RRTA (Lancaster) 1,765,741 1,678, % 1,699, % MCRCOG (Mercer) 14, ,6 36.8% 177, % WASHINGTON CITY 279,447 29, % 28,8-3.3% WCTA (Westmoreland) 1,5,59 1,78,47 2.7% 1,115, % Williamsport RVT 83, , % 876,2 2.3% YATA (York, Adams) 1,536,892 1,73, % 1,766, % ATA (North Central) 1,41,295 1,44,576.2% 1,393, % BTA (Butler) 219,29 22,369.6% 186, % CCCT (Carbon) 39,96 34,5-14.7% 4, % CATA (Crawford 238, , % 263, % DuFAST (Clearfield) 128, , % 127,68-5.3% EMTA (Endless Mountains) 469,6 441, % 429, % ICTA (Indiana) 493,88 451, % 396, % MIDCO (Armstrong) 144,61 126, % 125,62-1.1% MCTA (Monroe) 536, ,221-1.% 516, % BMC (Mount Carmel) 51,58 56,4 1.5% 61, % NCATA (New Castle) 1,226,878 1,163, % 1,19,26-4.7% STS (Schuykill) 334, , % 39, % VCTO (Venango) 163, , % 172,68 9.4% TAWC (Warren) 187,82 192,48 2.5% 192,913.2% WASHCO (Washington County) 83,818 84,22.5% 85, % Total 141,744, ,8,71.9% 144,618, % 58 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

68 Act 44 Revenue Vehicle Hours TABLE 4 Total Act 44 Revenue Vehicle Hours Statistics Agency Percent Changes vs Percent Changes vs SEPTA 6,489,873 6,658, % 6,83, % PAAC 1,877,51 1,91, % 1,948,84 2.% AMTRAN (Altoona) 45,13 44, % 44,13 -.6% BCTA (Beaver) 56,756 56, % 55, % BARTA (Berks) 143, , % 133, % CAMTRAN (Cambria) 9,573 81, % 82, % CAT (Cumberland, Dauphin, Harrisburg) 138, , % 136,452.5% CATA (Centre) 139, , % 157,1.9% COLTS (Lackawanna) 9,122 89, % 92, % COLT/LT (Lebanon) 3,193 31, % 31,396.6% EMTA (Erie) 184,94 184,996.5% 193, % FACT (Fayette) 27,618 28, % 3, % HPT (Hazelton) 3,26 32,2 5.8% 34,583 8.% LANTA (Lehigh, Northampton) 316, , % 319, % LCTA (Luzerne) 79,434 78, % 79, % MMVTA (Mid Mon Valley) 48,833 46, % 41, % POTTSTOWN 2,933 21,41 2.3% 21,613.9% RRTA (Lancaster) 129,662 12, % 126,68 5.2% MCRCOG (Mercer) 9,74 13, % 14,154 5.% WASHINGTON CITY 18,21 18,392 1.% 16, % WCTA (Westmoreland) 5,859 55, % 57,8 2.6% Williamsport RVT 54,678 55,54 1.6% 57, % YATA (York, Adams) 112, , % 127, % ATA (North Central) 18,39 18,539.5% 17,61 -.9% BTA (Butler) 18,21 18,45 2.1% 14, % CCCT (Carbon) 2,786 3, % 3,29-5.4% CATA (Crawford 17,424 17,564.8% 17, % DuFAST (Clearfield) 1,356 1, % 9, % EMTA (Endless Mountains) 22,884 2, % 2,38.9% ICTA (Indiana) 36,246 34, % 31,45-8.3% MIDCO (Armstrong) 9,69 7, % 7,864.8% MCTA (Monroe) 31,585 31,263-1.% 33, % BMC (Mount Carmel) 4,79 4, % 5,58 1.4% NCATA (New Castle) 57,152 56,51-1.1% 55,2-2.7% STS (Schuykill) 19,143 18, % 17,61-4.1% VCTO (Venango) 7,83 9, % 9, % TAWC (Warren) 1,87 1,58 4.2% 1, % WASHCO (Washington County) 5,264 5,275.2% 5, % FORMULA FACTORS Total 1,546,525 1,74, % 1,953,333 2.% Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

69 FORMULA FACTORS intentionally blank 6 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

70 Section III Urban Systems URBAN SYSTEMS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

71 SEPTA (Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) URBAN SYSTEMS Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority 1234 Market Street Philadelphia, PA Mr. Jeffrey Knueppel, General Manager Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 839 Population: 3,797,325 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 329,314,635 Senior Passengers: 25,757,352 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 86,858,539 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 6,83,274 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $582,992,5 Required Local Match: $86,376,71 House District Bucks: 18, 29, 31, 14, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 178 Chester: 13, 26, 74, 155, 156, 157, 158, 16, 167 Delaware: 159, 16, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 185, 191 Montgomery: 26, 53, 61, 7, 146, 147, 148, 149, 15, 151, 152, 153, 154, 157, 166, 194 Philadelphia: 152, 17, 172, 173, 174, 175, 177, 179, 18, 181, 182, 184, 185, 186, 188, 19, 191, 192, 194, 195, 197, 198, 2, 21, 22, 23 Senate District Bucks: 6, 1, 12, 24 Chester: 9, 19, 26, 44 Delaware: 8, 9, 17, 26 Montgomery: 4, 7, 12, 17, 24, 44 Philadelphia: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $2.25 Last Base Fare Increase: July 213 System-wide Increase: July 213 Current Fleet Size Motor Bus: 1,44 Commuter Rail Cars: 44 Heavy Rail Cars: 369 Street Car Rail/Light Rail: 159 Trolley Bus: 38 Paratransit Vehicles: 457 System-wide: 2,831 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 9, Paratransit: 85 Subcontractor: 594 System-wide: 9, FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $1,218,842 $1,218,842 Other Salaries & Wages $285,31 Fringes $422,61 Local $82,334 Revenue $514,459 Operator Salaries & Wages $221,238 Other $16,841 Purchased Trans $27,886 Fuel Utils $92,424 Maint. $62,542 State $555,48 Federal $66,569 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 62 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

72 (Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) SEPTA $4 Operating Expense Per Passenger $3 $2 $1 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 7, $21 6, $18 5, $15 4, $12 3, $9 2, $6 1, $3 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1, 6 8, 5 6, 4, , 1 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

73 SEPTA (Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) Community Transportation Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority 1234 Market Street Philadelphia, PA Mr. Jeffrey Knueppel, General Manager Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: $25.52 $21.25 July 27 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Philadelphia County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: 135 1,526,6 185, % No 1% Trip Information 65+ Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: 765,61 37,271 82, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $25,982,994 Sources of Funding $25,982,994 Shared-Ride Operating 83% Lottery 65% Area Agency on Aging 6% Other 2% Shared-Ride Admin 17% Subsidy 22% Passenger Fares 5% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 64 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

74 (Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) SEPTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY SEPTA does not provide shared-ride service through the Persons with Disabilities Program. Total Shared-Ride Trips 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

75 PAAC (Port Authority of Allegheny County) Port Authority of Allegheny County 345 Sixth Avenue, Third Floor Pittsburgh, PA Ms. Ellen McLean, Chief Executive Officer Customer Service: House District Allegheny: 16, 19, 2, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 3, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 4, 42, 44, 45, 46 Senate District Allegheny: 37, 38, 4, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 775 Population: 1,415,244 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 64,128,41 Senior Passengers: 4,812,63 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 26,78,814 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 1,948,84 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $2.5 Last Base Fare Increase: July 212 Current Employees Full-Time Fixed Route: 2,463 Paratransit: Subcontractor: 457 System-wide: 2,92 Part-Time Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $212,449,588 Required Local Match: $31,867,438 Current Fleet Size Motor Bus: 741 Street Car Rail/Light Rail: 83 Inclined Plane Cars: 2 Paratransit Vehicles: 377 System-wide: 1,23 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $355,636 $355,636 Other Salaries & Wages $79,544 Fringes $129,994 Local $34,99 Revenue $97,129 Fuel Utils $3,229 Operator Salaries & Wages $61,29 Other $2,457 Maint. $22,69 Purchased Trans $12,134 State $22,59 Federal $21,89 Expense includes ADA complementary and DAS expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary and DAS revenue. 66 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

76 (Port Authority of Allegheny County) PAAC Operating Expense Per Passenger $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, Total Passengers ( s) $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 URBAN SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2,5 $21 2, 1,5 $18 $15 $12 1, 5 $9 $6 $3 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 35, 35 3, 3 25, 25 2, 2 15, 15 1, 1 5, 5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

77 PAAC (Port Authority of Allegheny County) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Port Authority of Allegheny County/ACCESS 345 Sixth Avenue, Third Floor Pittsburgh, PA Ms. Ellen McLean, Chief Executive Officer Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Allegheny County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: 73 1,223,348 25, % Yes 1% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $22.5 $19.8 July ,93 6, ,74 1,31,598 2, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $22,863,671 Sources of Funding $22,863,671 Shared- Ride Admin 7% Area Agency on Aging 4% PwD Program 5% MATP 16% Other 5% Subsidy 5% Shared- Ride Operating 93% Lottery 56% Passenger Fares 9% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 68 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

78 (Port Authority of Allegheny County) PAAC Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $ Shared-Ride Trips $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 8, 7, 7, 6, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 1,4, 1,2, 1,, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY PAAC began providing PwD shared-ride trips in FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

79 AMTRAN (Altoona Metro Transit) Altoona Metro Transit 331 Fifth Avenue Altoona, PA 1662 Mr. Eric Wolf, General Manager Customer Service: House District Blair: 79, 8, 81 Senate District Blair: 3 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 25 Population: 69,68 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 585,457 Senior Passengers: 69,134 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 547,451 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 44,13 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.5 Last Base Fare Increase: August 212 Current Employees Full-Time Fixed Route: 37 Paratransit: Subcontractor: 15 System-wide: 52 Part-Time Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $2,713,473 Required Local Match: $136,56 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 24 Paratransit: 2 System-wide: 26 Community transportation provided by Blair Senior Services, Inc. (see page 2) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $4,755 $4,755 Other Salaries & Wages $857 Fringes $1,285 Fuel Utils $417 Maint. $279 Local $144 Revenue $833 Operator Salaries & Wages $1,96 Other $594 Purchased Trans $227 State $2,587 Federal $1,191 Expense includes ADA complementary expenses. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 7 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

80 (Altoona Metro Transit) AMTRAN Operating Expense Per Passenger Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ $25 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

81 BCTA (Beaver County Transit Authority*) Beaver County Transit Authority 2 West Washington Street Rochester, PA Ms. Mary Jo Morandini, General Manager Customer Service: House District Beaver: 9, 1, 14, 15, 16, 46 Senate District Beaver: 46, 47 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 44 Population: 17,596 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 925,927 Senior Passengers: 79,777 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 917,147 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 55,454 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $2.25 Last Base Fare Increase: Jan 213 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 61 1 Paratransit: 35 1 System-wide: 96 2 *Includes Rural Service Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $3,34,221 Required Local Match: $458,912 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 23 Paratransit: 24 System-wide: 47 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $5,84 $5,84 Other Salaries & Wages $1,149 Fringes $1,125 Fuel Utils $1,46 Local $96 Revenue $1,641 Operator Salaries & Wages $1,219 Other $7 Maint. $61 Expense includes DAS expense which is also included on the Community Transportation page. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. State $3,13 Revenue includes DAS revenue which is also included on the Community Transportation page. Federal $19 72 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

82 (Beaver County Transit Authority) BCTA Operating Expense Per Passenger $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 1,2 1, Total Passengers ( s) $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $35 $3 $25 $2 $15 $1 $5 URBAN SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 7 $ $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1,2 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

83 BCTA (Beaver County Transit Authority) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Beaver County Transit Authority 2 West Washington Street Rochester, PA Ms. Mary Jo Morandini, General Manager Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Beaver County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,539 31, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $2.52 $17.4 January ,331 55,65 84,981 91, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $3,389,366 Sources of Funding $3,389,366 Shared- Ride Admin 13% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 38% MATP 5% MH/ID 4% Other 1% Subsidy 24% Shared- Ride Operating 49% Area Agency on Aging 3% Lottery 15% Passenger Fares 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 74 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

84 (Beaver County Transit Authority) BCTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, BCTA does not provide shared-ride service through the Persons with Disabilities Program. 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 1, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

85 BARTA (Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority) URBAN SYSTEMS Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority 17 North 11th Street Reading, PA Mr. David Kilmer, Executive Director Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 864 Population: 411,442 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 3,93,296 Senior Passengers: 413,238 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,725,436 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 133,485 House District Berks: 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 13, 134, 187 Senate District Berks: 11, 24, 29, 44 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.7 Last Base Fare Increase: January 211 Current Employees Full-Time Fixed Route: 93 Paratransit: 55 Subcontractor: 15 System-wide: 163 Part-Time Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $7,931,351 Required Local Match: $483,566 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 57 Paratransit: 64 System-wide: 121 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $12,24 $12,24 Operator Salaries & Wages $3,299 Other Salaries & Wages $1,26 Local $213 Revenue $3,425 Fringes $3,137 Other $1,74 Purchased Trans $197 Maint. $898 Fuel Utils $1,763 State $7,714 Federal $672 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 76 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

86 (Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority) BARTA Operating Expense Per Passenger $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 3,5 3, 2,5 2, Total Passengers ( s) $ $35 $3 $25 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 1,5 $15 1, $1 5 $5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 16 $1 12 $8 8 $6 $4 4 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2, 3 1, , FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

87 BARTA (Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority) Community Transportation Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority 17 North 11th Street Reading, PA Mr. David Kilmer, Executive Director Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: $13.62 Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: $13.3 Fare Structure Implementation Date: September 215 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Berks County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,422 59, % Yes 23.75% Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: 76,281 2,628 47, ,364 61, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $5,64,277 Sources of Funding $5,64,277 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 22% Subsidy 33% Passenger Fares 4% Lottery 2% PwD Program 1% Shared- Ride Admin 2% Shared- Ride Operating 58% Other 2% MH/ID 5% MATP 34% Area Agency on Aging 1% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 78 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

88 (Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority) BARTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 9, 3,5 8, 7, 6, 5, 3, 2,5 2, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1,5 1, 5 FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

89 CamTran (Cambria County Transit Authority*) Cambria County Transit Authority 52 Maple Avenue Johnstown, PA 1591 Ms. Rose Lucey-Noll, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Cambria: 71, 72, 73 Senate District Cambria: 35 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 693 Population: 137,732 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 1,197,414 Senior Passengers: 164,71 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,95,978 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 82,868 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.55 Last Base Fare Increase: Jan 216 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: Paratransit: 4 System-wide: *Includes Rural Service Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $6,344,363 Required Local Match: $697,57 Current Fleet Size Motor Bus: 49 Inclined Plane Cars: 2 Paratransit Vehicles: 4 System-wide: 55 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $8,114 $8,114 Other Salaries & Wages $1,432 Fringes $2,154 Local $698 Revenue $1,23 Operator Salaries & Wages $2,144 Other $859 Fuel Utils $935 Maint. $59 State $6,393 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 8 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

90 (Cambria County Transit Authority) CamTran Operating Expense Per Passenger $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 1,5 1, Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ $18 $16 $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1 $12 8 $1 6 4 $8 $6 $4 2 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1,5 16 1,25 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

91 CamTran (Cambria County Transit Authority) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Cambria County Transit Authority 52 Maple Avenue Johnstown, PA Ms. Rose Lucey-Noll, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Cambria County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,679 27, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $14.17 $11.89 January ,786 1,767 1,824 51, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $1,418,575 Sources of Funding $1,418,575 Shared- Ride Admin 13% Subsidy 49% Passenger Fares 1% Shared- Ride Operating 87% Other 1% Area Agency on Aging 8% PwD Program 1% Lottery 4% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 82 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

92 (Cambria County Transit Authority) CamTran Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

93 CAT (Capital Area Transit) Capital Area Transit 91 North Cameron Street Harrisburg, PA 1711 Mr. William A. Jones, General Manager Customer Service: House District Cumberland: 87, 88, 89, 92, 199 Dauphin: 98, 13, 14, 15, 16 Senate District Cumberland: 31 Dauphin: 15, 27, 48 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 1,7 Population: 58,279 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 2,592,85 Senior Passengers: 237,2 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,861,128 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 136,452 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.75 Last Base Fare Increase: October 21 Current Employees Full-Time Fixed Route: 141 Paratransit: 51 Subcontractor: 23 System-wide: 215 Part-Time Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $7,421,148 Required Local Match: $84,941 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 78 Paratransit: 52 System-wide: 13 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $15,89 $15,89 Fringes $4,933 Revenue $3,513 Other Salaries & Wages $2,652 Fuel Utils $1,724 Local $865 Maint. $821 Operator Salaries & Wages $4,311 Other $9 Purchased Trans $468 State $7,461 Federal $3,97 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 84 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

94 (Capital Area Transit) CAT Operating Expense Per Passenger $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 3, 2,5 2, Total Passengers ( s) $ $3 $25 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 1,5 $15 1, $1 5 $5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2 $14 15 $12 $1 1 $8 $6 5 $4 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2,5 24 2, 2 1,5 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

95 CAT (Capital Area Transit) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Capital Area Transit 91 North Cameron Street Harrisburg, PA Mr. William A. Jones, General Manager Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Dauphin County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,1 36, % Yes 39.27% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $2.29 $16.92 February ,696 1,524 97, ,836 4 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $4,117,375 Sources of Funding $4,117,375 Shared- Ride Admin 12% MH/ID 13% Other 3% Subsidy 18% Passenger Fares 3% Lottery 21% Shared- Ride Operating 88% MATP 37% PwD Program 4% Area Agency on Aging 1% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 86 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

96 (Capital Area Transit) CAT Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 7, 12, 6, 1, 5, 4, 3, 2, 8, 6, 4, 1, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

97 CATA (Centre Area Transportation Authority) Centre Area Transportation Authority 281 West Whitehall Road State College, PA 1681 Ms. Louwana Oliva, General Manager Customer Service: House District Centre: 76, 77, 171 Senate District Centre: 34 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 89 Population: 14,36 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 7,379,79 Senior Passengers: 49,526 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,944,783 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 157,1 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.75 Last Base Fare Increase: July 214 System-wide Increase: August 211* Current Employees Full-Time Fixed Route: 18 Paratransit: 1 Subcontractor: 7 System-wide: 188 Part-Time Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $5,63,82 Required Local Match: $499,299 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 71 Paratransit: 5 System-wide: 76 *Tokens and multi-ride passes increased in price. FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $13,615 $13,615 Operator Salaries & Wages $5,66 Other Salaries & Wages $2,625 State $2,41 Local $574 Other $957 Purchased Trans $313 Maint. $741 Fringes $3,87 Fuel Utils $826 Federal $3,144 Revenue $7,496 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 88 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

98 (Centre Area Transportation Authority) CATA Operating Expense Per Passenger $2. $1.75 $1.5 $1.25 $1. $.75 $.5 $.25 8, 7, 6, 5, Total Passengers ( s) $. $6 $5 $4 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 4, $3 3, 2, 1, $2 $1 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2,5 7 2, 6 5 1,5 4 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

99 CATA (Centre Area Transportation Authority) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Centre Area Transportation Authority 281 West Whitehall Road State College, PA Ms. Louwana Oliva, General Manager Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Centre County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: , 12, % No 1% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $19.94 $17. July 213 Trip Information 65+ Trips: 16,559 PwD Trips: Centre County (see page 188) Other Shared-Ride Trips: 832 Total Shared-Ride Trips: 17,265 4 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $45,318 Sources of Funding $45,318 Shared- Ride Admin 1% Subsidy 22% Passenger Fares 15% Shared- Ride Operating 99% Lottery 63% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 9 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

100 (Centre Area Transportation Authority) CATA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 25, 2, 15, 1, CATA does not provide PwD sharedride service. Centre County provides PwD (see page 189). 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

101 COLTS (County of Lackawanna Transit System) County of Lackawanna Transit System 8 North South Road Scranton, PA 1854 Mr. Robert J. Fiume, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Lackawanna: 112, 113, 114, 117, 118 Senate District Lackawanna: 22 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 459 Population: 214,437 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 1,132,246 Senior Passengers: 186,922 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,176,351 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 92,121 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.75 Last Base Fare Increase: July 213 Current Employees Full-Time Fixed Route: 69 Paratransit: 35 Subcontractor: System-wide: 14 Part-Time Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $6,289,858 Required Local Match: $594,758 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 35 Paratransit: 29 System-wide: 64 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $8,854 $8,854 Other Salaries & Wages $1,78 Fringes $2,679 Local $664 Revenue $1,47 Fuel Utils $888 State $4,75 Operator Salaries & Wages $2,458 Other $8 Maint. $454 Purchased Trans $497 Federal $1,97 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. Financial data is unaudited. 92 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

102 (County of Lackawanna Transit System) COLTS Operating Expense Per Passenger 2, 1,6 1,2 8 Total Passengers ( s) $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ $2 $15 $1 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 4 $5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1 $12 8 $1 6 4 $8 $6 $4 2 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1,5 2 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Reported ridership prior to FY may have been overstated. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

103 COLTS (County of Lackawanna Transit System) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS County of Lackawanna Transit System 8 North South Road Scranton, PA Mr. Robert J. Fiume, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Lackawanna County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,437 37, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $19.9 $16.39 July ,638 1,932 2,845 82,415 11, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $2,782,693 Sources of Funding $2,783,745 Shared- Ride Admin 21% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 25% Area Agency on Aging 8% PwD Program 1% MATP 33% Other 1% Shared- Ride Operating 54% Lottery 5% Subsidy 7% Financial data is unaudited. Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 94 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

104 (County of Lackawanna Transit System) COLTS Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 9, 2,5 8, 7, 2, 6, 5, 1,5 4, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5 FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

105 COLT/LT (County of Lebanon Transit Authority) County of Lebanon Transit Authority 2 Willow Street Lebanon, PA 1746 Ms. Theresa Giurintano, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Lebanon: 11, 12 Senate District Lebanon: 48 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 362 Population: 133,568 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 337,124 Senior Passengers: 65,878 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 55,946 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 31,396 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.5 Last Base Fare Increase: August 211 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 28 1 Paratransit: 13 5 System-wide: 41 6 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $1,685,132 Required Local Match: $92,458 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 18 Paratransit: 14 System-wide: 32 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $2,724 $2,724 Other Salaries & Wages $564 Fringes $732 Fuel Utils $35 State $1,76 Local $92 Revenue $48 Maint. $58 Operator Salaries & Wages $59 Other $43 Federal $1,148 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 96 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

106 (County of Lebanon Transit Authority) COLT/LT Operating Expense Per Passenger $1 $8 $6 $4 $ Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ $2 $16 $12 $8 $4 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 4 $1 3 $8 2 $6 $4 1 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

107 COLT/LT (County of Lebanon Transit Authority) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS County of Lebanon Transit Authority 2 Willow Street Lebanon, PA Ms. Theresa Giurintano, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Lebanon County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,568 22, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $2.9 $17.38 July ,829 2,534 16,96 46, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $977,987 Sources of Funding $977,987 Shared- Ride Admin 14% MH/ID 31% Subsidy 1% Passenger Fares 7% Shared- Ride Operating 86% MATP 6% Area Agency on Aging PwD 2% Program 5% Lottery 48% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 98 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

108 (County of Lebanon Transit Authority) COLT/LT Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $ Shared-Ride Trips $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 35, 3, 3, 2,5 25, 2, 15, 1, 2, 1,5 1, 5, 5 FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

109 EMTA (Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority) Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority 127 East 14th Street Erie, PA 1653 Mr. Michael C. Tann, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Erie: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 17 Senate District Erie: 49, 5 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 77 Population: 189,872 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 3,355,186 Senior Passengers: 171,661 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 2,294,194 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 193,363 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.35 Last Base Fare Increase: October 215 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: Paratransit: System-wide: Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $8,369,496 Required Local Match: $861,49 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 74 Paratransit: 63 System-wide: 137 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $15,311 $15,311 Operator Salaries & Wages $5,62 Other Salaries & Wages $1,935 State $7,779 Local $863 Other $958 Fringes $4,72 Revenue $3,373 Maint. $1,186 Fuel Utils $1,45 Federal $3,296 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 1 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

110 (Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority) EMTA Operating Expense Per Passenger $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ $25 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 25 $1 2 $8 15 $6 1 $4 5 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2,5 24 2, 2 1,5 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

111 EMTA (Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority 127 East 14th Street Erie, PA Mr. Michael C. Tann, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Erie County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: 82 28,566 4, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $19.65 $14.78 December ,17 3,779 87, ,449 1, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $3,2,377 Sources of Funding $3,692,825 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 1% Passenger Fares 2% Other 5% Lottery 27% PwD Program 2% Shared- Ride Admin 8% Shared- Ride Operating 82% MATP 61% Area Agency on Aging 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 12 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

112 (Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority) EMTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $ Shared-Ride Trips $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 8, 8, 7, 7, 6, 6, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

113 FACT (Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation) Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation 825 Airport Road Lemont Furnace, PA Ms. Lori Groover-Smith, Director House District Fayette: 49, 5, 51, 52, 58, 59 Senate District Fayette: 32 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 812 Population: 136,66 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 194,122 Senior Passengers: 21,684 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 585,844 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 3,588 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $2. Last Base Fare Increase: July 212 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 13 5 Paratransit: 3 4 Subcontractor: 4 4 System-wide: Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $877,942 Required Local Match: $17,248 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 12 Paratransit: 28 System-wide: 4 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $1,894 $1,894 Other Salaries & Wages $382 Fringes $265 Fuel Utils $331 Maint. $82 State $65 Local $22 Operator Salaries & Wages $174 Other $222 Purchased Trans $438 Federal $772 Revenue $27 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 14 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

114 (Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation) FACT $12 Operating Expense Per Passenger $9 $6 $ Total Passengers ( s) $ $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 5 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 35 $7 3 $6 25 $5 2 $4 15 $3 1 $2 5 $1 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

115 FACT (Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation 825 Airport Road Lemont Furnace, PA Ms. Lori Groover-Smith, Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Fayette County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,66 24,58 18.% Yes 4.4% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $14.61 $11.81 July ,268 3,695 56,137 95,1 22 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $2,11,21 Sources of Funding $2,11,21 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 1% Shared- Ride Operating 65% Other 4% Subsidy 11% Passenger Fares 2% Lottery 22% PwD Program 3% Shared-Ride Admin 25% MATP 55% Area Agency on Aging 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole dollar. 16 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

116 (Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation) FACT Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $2. $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $ Shared-Ride Trips $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 4, 14, 35, 12, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 1, 8, 6, 4, 5, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

117 HPT (Hazleton Public Transit) Hazleton Public Transit 126 West Mine Street Hazleton, PA 1821 Mr. Ralph Sharp, Transit Director Customer Service: House District Luzerne: 116, 122, 124 Senate District Luzerne: 14, 27, 29 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 144 Population: 58,43 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 221,88 Senior Passengers: 6,722 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 436,38 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 34,583 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.2 Last Base Fare Increase: October 215 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 5 Paratransit: 1 Subcontractor: 2 6 System-wide: 25 7 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $1,745,84 Required Local Match: $134,346 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 14 Paratransit: 4 System-wide: 18 Community transportation provided by Luzerne County Transportation Authority (see page 116) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $2,62 $2,62 Purchased Trans $2,149 Other $179 State $1,442 Local $134 Maint. $6 Other Salaries & Wages $176 Fringes $59 Fuel Utils $51 Federal $85 Revenue $239 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 18 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

118 (Hazleton Public Transit) HPT Operating Expense Per Passenger $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $ Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 4 $1 3 $8 2 $6 $4 1 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

119 LANta (Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority) URBAN SYSTEMS Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority 16 Lehigh Street Allentown, PA 1813 Mr. Owen O Neil, Executive Director Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 16 Population: 389, Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 5,55,36 Senior Passengers: 621,12 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 4,415,653 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 319,253 House District Lehigh: 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 183, 187 Northampton: 131, 133, 135, 136, 137, 138, 183 Senate District Lehigh: 16, 18, 24 Northampton: 16, 18, 19, 24 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $2. Last Base Fare Increase: October 28 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 21 Paratransit: 5 Subcontractor: System-wide: Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $14,673,11 Required Local Match: $827,8 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 83 Paratransit: 15 System-wide: 188 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $25,33 $25,33 Other Salaries & Wages $2,589 Fringes $6,5 State $12,98 Local $827 Fuel Utils $2,735 Maint. $1,837 Operator Salaries & Wages $5,95 Other $1,943 Purchased Trans $3,749 Federal $5,97 Revenue $5,598 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 11 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

120 (Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority) LANta Operating Expense Per Passenger $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 7, 6, 5, 4, Total Passengers ( s) $ $25 $2 $15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 3, 2, 1, $1 $5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 35 $15 3 $9 25 $75 2 $6 15 $45 1 $3 5 $15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 5, 24 4, 2 3, 2, , 4 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

121 LANta (Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority) Community Transportation Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority 16 Lehigh Street Allentown, PA Mr. Owen O Neil, Executive Director Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: $21.15 $18.8 October 215 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Lehigh and Northampton Counties Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,232 98, % Yes 1% Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: 144,546 16,386 13,99 264,31 73,64 95 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $7,753,344 Sources of Funding $8,263,52 Shared- Ride Admin 7% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 18% MATP 55% Other <1% Passenger Fares 6% Shared- Ride Operating 75% Area Agency on Aging 2% PwD Program 4% Lottery 33% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 112 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

122 (Lehigh and Northampton Transportation Authority) LANta Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 16, 18, 14, 16, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

123 LCTA (Luzerne County Transportation Authority) URBAN SYSTEMS Luzerne County Transportation Authority 315 Northampton Street Kingston, PA 1874 Mr. Norm Gavlick, Executive Director Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 56 Population: 22,5 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 1,29,91 Senior Passengers: 194,889 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,166,92 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 79,381 House District Luzerne: 116, 117, 118, 119, 12, 121 Senate District Luzerne: 14, 2, 22, 27 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.5 Last Base Fare Increase: August 26 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: Paratransit: Subcontractor: 3 System-wide: Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $5,149,86 Required Local Match: $59,612 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 38 Paratransit: 49 System-wide: 87 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $8,932 $8,932 Fringes $2,937 Fuel Utils $893 Maint. $46 Purchased Trans $36 State $5,73 Local $513 Other $593 Other Salaries & Wages $1,39 Operator Salaries & Wages $2,299 Federal $2,41 Revenue $1,35 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 114 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

124 (Luzerne County Transportation Authority) LCTA Operating Expense Per Passenger $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 1,5 1, Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ $18 $16 $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1 $12 75 $1 $8 5 $6 25 $4 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1,4 2 1,2 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Reported ridership prior to FY was overstated. The Department has restated ridership and the changes are reflected above. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

125 LCTA (Luzerne County Transportation Authority) Community Transportation Luzerne County Transportation Authority 315 Northampton Street Kingston, PA Mr. Norm Gavlick, Executive Director Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: $16.32 $12.68 November 28 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Luzerne Counties Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,918 57, % Yes 5.34% Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: 41,991 1,835 91,32 135,146 25, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $3,445,897 Sources of Funding $2,964,13 Shared- Ride Admin 28% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 9% MH/ID 6% Other 29% Passenger Fares 3% Lottery 2% PwD Program 1% Shared- Ride Operating 63% MATP 4% Area Agency on Aging 1% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 116 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

126 (Luzerne County Transportation Authority) LCTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 6, 3,5 5, 3, 4, 3, 2, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 1, 5 FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

127 MCRCOG (Mercer County Regional Council of Governments) Mercer County Regional Council of Governments 2495 Highland Road Hermitage, PA Mr. Thomas Tulip, Executive Director House District Mercer: 7, 8, 17 Senate District Mercer: 5 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 67 Population: 41,279 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 92,268 Senior Passengers: 15,246 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 177,653 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 14,154 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.25 Last Base Fare Increase: July 214 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 6 Paratransit: 21 8 System-wide: 27 8 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $696,789 Required Local Match: $53,37 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 5 Paratransit: 31 System-wide: 36 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $1,113 $1,113 Other Salaries & Wages $182 Fringes $138 Fuel Utils $161 State $697 Local $53 Operator Salaries & Wages $181 Other $35 Maint. $146 Federal $238 Revenue $125 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 118 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

128 (Mercer County Regional Council of Governments) MCRCOG Operating Expense Per Passenger $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $ Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ $1 $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 17 $1 14 $ $6 $4 3 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

129 MCRCOG (Mercer County Regional Council of Governments) Community Transportation Mercer Co. Regional Council of Governments 2495 Highland Road Hermitage, PA Mr. Thomas Tulip, Executive Director Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: $21.59 $13.95 July 213 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Mercer County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,638 21, % Yes N/A Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: 5,65 2,12 33,156 85,233 1, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $1,469,666 Sources of Funding $1,55,236 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 3% Shared- Ride Operating 75% MATP 34% Other 1% Subsidy 1% Passenger Fares 4% Shared- Ride Admin 22% Area Agency on Aging 1% PwD Program 3% Lottery 47% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 12 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

130 (Mercer County Regional Council of Governments) MCRCOG Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $ Shared-Ride Trips $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 6, 4, 5, 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 3, 2, 2, 1, 1,5 1, 5 FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

131 MMVTA (Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority) Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority 13 McKean Avenue Charleroi, PA 1522 Ms. Donna Weckoski, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Washington: 39, 46, 48, 49, 5 Westmoreland: 25, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 Senate District Washington: 32, 37, 46 Westmoreland: 32, 38, 39, 41, 45, 46 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 45 Population: 66,86 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 327,724 Senior Passengers: 35,35 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 783,445 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 41,652 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $2. Last Base Fare Increase: July 214 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 6 Paratransit: Subcontractor: 39 4 System-wide: 45 4 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $2,527,291 Required Local Match: $63,486 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 28 Paratransit: 1 System-wide: 29 Community transportation provided by Washington County Transportation Authority (see page 132) and Westmoreland County Transit Authority (see page 138) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $3,98 $3,98 Purchased Trans $2,734 Other $273 Other Salaries & Wages $256 State $2,62 Local $63 Fringes $115 Fuel Utils $6 Maint. $2 Federal $572 Revenue $743 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 122 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

132 (Mid Mon Valley Transit Authority) MMVTA Operating Expense Per Passenger $15 $12 $9 $6 $ Total Passengers ( s) $ $2 $15 $1 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 15 1 $5 5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 6 $12 5 $1 4 $8 3 $6 2 $4 1 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

133 PART (Pottstown Area Rapid Transit) Pottstown Area Rapid Transit 1 East High Street Pottstown, PA Mr. Mark D. Flanders, Borough Manager Customer Service: House District Montgomery: 53, 61, 7, 146, 147, 148, 149, 15, 151, 152, 153, 154, 157, 17, 194 Senate District Montgomery: 4, 7, 1, 12, 17, 19, 24, 44 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 34 Population: 51, Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 258,14 Senior Passengers: 4,257 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 267,93 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 21,613 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.9 Last Base Fare Increase: July 214 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 5 Paratransit: Subcontractor: System-wide: Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $1,19,82 Required Local Match: $73,871 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 9 Paratransit: 2 System-wide: 11 Community transportation provided by Suburban Transit Network, Inc. (see page 24) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $2,92 $2,92 Purchased Trans $1,699 Other $61 Other Salaries & Wages $99 State $1,13 Local $74 Fringes $51 Fuel Utils $182 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Federal $583 Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. Revenue $ Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

134 (Pottstown Area Rapid Transit) PART $9 Operating Expense Per Passenger $8 $6 $5 $3 $ Total Passengers ( s) $ $2 $16 $12 $8 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 5 $4 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 25 $12 2 $ $8 $6 $4 5 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

135 RRTA (Red Rose Transit Authority) Red Rose Transit Authority 45 Erick Road Lancaster, PA 1761 Mr. David Kilmer, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Lancaster: 37, 41, 43, 96, 97, 98, 99, 1 Senate District Lancaster: 13, 36, 48 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 952 Population: 42,92 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 1,958,6 Senior Passengers: 23,757 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,699,969 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 126,68 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.7 Last Base Fare Increase: August 211 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: Paratransit: 1 Subcontractor: System-wide: Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $5,832,842 Required Local Match: $259,336 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 42 Paratransit: 73 System-wide: 115 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $9,864 $9,864 Fringes $2,61 Fuel Utils $984 State $4,167 Other Salaries & Wages $968 Maint. $752 Local $76 Operator Salaries & Wages $2,615 Other $1,386 Purchased Trans $558 Federal $1,875 Revenue $3,746 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 126 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

136 (Red Rose Transit Authority) RRTA Operating Expense Per Passenger $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 2,5 2, 1,5 Total Passengers ( s) $ $35 $3 $25 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 1, 5 $15 $1 $5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 15 $1 12 $8 9 $6 6 $4 3 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2, 2 1,5 16 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

137 RRTA (Red Rose Transit Authority) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Red Rose Transit Authority 45 Erick Road Lancaster, PA Mr. David Kilmer, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Lancaster County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,445 77,78 15.% Yes 1% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $21.59 $16.7 May ,219 11, , ,223 28,211 5 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $6,387,13 Sources of Funding $6,422,471 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 15% MH/ID 18% Other 7% Passenger Fares 3% Lottery 28% Shared- Ride Admin 25% Shared- Ride Operating 6% MATP 36% PwD Program 4% Area Agency on Aging 4% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 128 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

138 (Red Rose Transit Authority) RRTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $ Shared-Ride Trips $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 12, 14, 1, 12, 8, 6, 4, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

139 Washington County Transportation Authority URBAN SYSTEMS Washington County Transportation Authority 5 East Chestnut Street Washington, PA 1531 Ms. Sheila Gombita, Executive Director Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 33 Population: 61,634 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 23,316 Senior Passengers: 8,416 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 85,685 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 5,249 House District Washington: 39, 4, 46, 48, 49, 5 Senate District Washington: 32, 37, 46 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.5 Last Base Fare Increase: May 211 Current Employees Fixed Route: Paratransit: Subcontractor: System-wide: Full-Time Part-Time Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $217,48 Required Local Match: $32,557 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 3 Paratransit: 73 System-wide: 76 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $293 $293 Other $8 Other Salaries & Wages $4 Local $38 Revenue $2 Federal $45 Fuel Utils $21 Purchased Trans $26 State $19 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 13 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

140 Washington County Transportation Authority Operating Expense Per Passenger $2 $16 $12 $8 $ Total Passengers ( s) $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $4 $3 $2 URBAN SYSTEMS 5 $1 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 6 $7 5 $ $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Washington County Transportation Authority began providing fixed-route service in FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

141 Washington County Transportation Authority Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Washington County Transportation Authority 5 East Chestnut Street Washington, PA Ms. Sheila Gombita, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Washington County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,82 36, % Yes 1% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $23.19 $17.65 May ,686 26,4 69,47 192,556 13, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $5,332,187 Sources of Funding $5,251,989 Shared- Ride Admin 11% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 1% MATP 39% MH/ID 2% Other 5% Subsidy 3% Passenger Fares 4% Shared- Ride Operating 79% Area Agency on Aging 4% PwD Program 1% Lottery 33% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 132 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

142 Washington County Transportation Authority Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 14, 12, 1, 5, 45, 4, 35, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

143 Washington, City of City of Washington 5 East Chestnut Street Washington, PA 1531 Mr. Joe Thomas, Dir. Fixed Route Services Customer Service: House District Washington: 39, 4, 46, 48, 49, 5 Senate District Washington: 32, 37, 46 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 33 Population: 61,634 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 67,177 Senior Passengers: 8,999 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 28,8 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 16,446 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.5 Last Base Fare Increase: July 212 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 2 1 Paratransit: 2 1 Subcontractor: 11 System-wide: 15 2 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $1,92,284 Required Local Match: $154,752 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 8 Paratransit: 3 System-wide: 11 Community transportation provided by Washington County Transportation Authority (see page 132) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $1,241 $1,241 Purchased Trans $922 State $99 Local $155 Other $35 Maint. $3 Fuel Utils $168 Other Salaries & Wages $113 Revenue $177 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 134 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

144 Washington, City of Operating Expense Per Passenger $28 $24 $2 $16 $12 $8 $ Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 21 $ $8 $ $4 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Began commuter service to Pittsburgh on July 1, 212. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

145 WCTA (Westmoreland County Transportation Authority) URBAN SYSTEMS Westmoreland County Transit Authority 41 Bell Way Greensburg, PA 1561 Mr. Alan Blahovec, Executive Director Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 668 Population: 296,66 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 541,413 Senior Passengers: 7,327 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,115,339 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 57,8 House District Westmoreland: 25, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 Senate District Westmoreland: 32, 38, 39, 41, 45, 46 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $2. Last Base Fare Increase: Jan 214 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 6 4 Paratransit: 8 1 Subcontractor: 98 1 System-wide: *Includes Rural Service Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $2,981,743 Required Local Match: $299,782 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 41 Paratransit: 61 System-wide: 12 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $5,988 $5,988 Purchased Trans $3,675 Other $365 Other Salaries & Wages $291 State $2,948 Local $3 Fringes $96 Fuel Utils $983 Maint. $578 Federal $1,119 Revenue $1,621 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 136 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

146 (Westmoreland County Transportation Authority) WCTA Operating Expense Per Passenger $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $ Total Passengers ( s) $ $3 $25 $2 $15 $1 $5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 6 $12 5 $1 4 $8 3 $6 2 $4 1 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1,2 12 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

147 WCTA (Westmoreland County Transit Authority) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Westmoreland County Transit Authority 41 Bell Way Greensburg, PA Mr. Alan Blahovec, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Westmoreland County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: 1,25 365,169 68, % Yes 1% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $21.47 $16.55 August ,496 5,76 67,71 18,282 79, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $5,292,754 Sources of Funding $5,292,754 Shared- Ride Admin 27% MATP 39% Subsidy 19% Shared- Ride Operating 67% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 6% Area Agency on Aging 2% PwD Program 2% Lottery 34% Passenger Fares 4% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 138 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

148 (Westmoreland County Transit Authority) WCTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $ Shared-Ride Trips $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 2, 6, 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Prior to FY MATP trips were not reported in Total Shared-Ride trips. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

149 Williamsport RVT (River Valley Transit) Williamsport River Valley Transit (RVT) 15 West Third Street Williamsport, PA 1771 Mr. William Nichols, Jr., General Manager Customer Service: House District Lycoming: 83, 84 Senate District Lycoming: 23 URBAN SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 89 Population: 69,764 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 1,36,118 Senior Passengers: 186,664 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 876,2 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 57,353 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $2. Last Base Fare Increase: May 25 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 51 4 Paratransit: Subcontractor: 2 System-wide: 51 6 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $3,675,461 Required Local Match: $318,4 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 35 Paratransit: System-wide: 35 Community transportation provided by provided by STEP, Inc. (see page 238) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $6,672 $6,672 Other Salaries & Wages $974 Fringes $1,166 Fuel Utils $595 State $3,749 Local $318 Maint. $283 Operator Salaries & Wages $1,761 Other $1,879 Purchased Trans $14 Federal $1,5 Revenue $1,15 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 14 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

150 (River Valley Transit) Williamsport RVT Operating Expense Per Passenger $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, Total Passengers ( s) FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ $25 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 URBAN SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 7 $14 6 $12 5 $1 4 $8 3 $6 2 $4 1 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

151 YATA (Central Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) URBAN SYSTEMS Central Pennsylvania Transportation Authority 123 Roosevelt Avenue York, PA 1744 Mr. Richard Farr, Executive Director Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 1,433 Population: 537,169 Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 1,68,293 Senior Passengers: 17,524 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,766,822 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 127,623 House District York: 47, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 193, 196 Adams: 91, 193 Senate District York: 13, 15, 28, 31, 33 Adams: 33 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.6 Fixed Route Average: $1.4 Last Base Fare Increase: July 213 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: Paratransit: Subcontractor: 8 21 System-wide: *Includes Rural Service Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $5,147,45 Required Local Match: $379,913 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 59 Paratransit: 129 System-wide: 188 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Other Salaries & Wages $1,899 Operating Expenses ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $1,739 $1,739 Fringes $2,825 State $5,51 Local $485 Fuel Utils $1,41 Operator Salaries & Wages $2,945 Other $1,6 Maint. $654 Federal $3,323 Revenue $1,88 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 142 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

152 (Central Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) YATA Operating Expense Per Passenger $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 2, 1,5 Total Passengers ( s) $ $2 $15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour URBAN SYSTEMS 1, $1 5 $5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 14 $ $8 $ $4 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2,1 16 1,8 1,5 12 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

153 YATA (Central Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS Central Pennsylvania Transportation Authority 123 Roosevelt Avenue York, PA Mr. Richard Farr, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Adams and York Counties Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: 1, ,379 77, % Yes 3.31% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $17.68 $14.76 October ,152 13,455 45,65 136,672 33, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $3,656,283 Sources of Funding $3,656,283 Shared- Ride Admin 7% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 26% MATP 26% MH/ID 2% Other 1% Subsidy 7% Passenger Fares 4% Shared- Ride Operating 67% Area Agency on Aging 4% PwD Program 6% Lottery 32% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 144 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

154 (Central Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) YATA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $ Shared-Ride Trips $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips URBAN SYSTEMS 1, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Prior to FY MH/ID trips were not reported in Total Shared-Ride trips. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

155 Community Transportation URBAN SYSTEMS intentionally blank 146 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

156 Section IV Rural Systems RURAL SYSTEMS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

157 ATA (Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA) Area Transportation Authority 44 Transportation Center Johnsonburg, PA Mr. Michael Imbrogno, CEO Customer Service: House District Cameron: 67 Clearfield: 74, 75 Elk: 75 Jefferson: 66 McKean: 65, 67 Potter: 67 Senate District Cameron: 25 Clearfield: 25, 35, 41 Elk: 25 Jefferson: 25 McKean: 25 Potter: 25 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 5,92 Population: 224,78 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.25 Last Base Fare Increase: July 28 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 426,776 Senior Passengers: 26,14 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,393,649 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 17,61 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $4,63,597 Required Local Match: $261,641 Current Employees Full-Time Fixed Route: 11 Paratransit: Subcontractor: 3 System-wide: 14 Part-Time Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 4 Paratransit: 55 System-wide: 95 Purchased Trans $229 Operating Expense ( s) Other $87 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Funds ( s) $7,393 $7,393 Operator Salaries & Wages $1,523 Local $298 Revenue $1,223 Maint. $449 Fuel Utils $761 Fringes $1,911 Other Salaries & Wages $1,713 State $3,774 Federal $2,97 Expense includes DAS expense which is also included on the Community Transportation page. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes DAS revenue which is also included on the Community Transportation page. Financial data is unaudited. 148 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

158 (Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA) ATA Operating Expense Per Passenger $2 $16 $12 $8 $4 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $16 $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY RURAL SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include DAS passengers which are also included on the Community Transportation page. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

159 ATA (Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA) Community Transportation Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA 44 Transportation Center Johnsonburg, PA Mr. Michael Imbrogno, CEO Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: $5.5 $5.6 July 29 RURAL SYSTEMS Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Cameron, Clearfield, Elk, Jefferson, McKean, and Potter Counties Square Miles: 5,92 Population: 224, Population: 4,449 % of Population 65 and older: 18.% MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Yes 1.57% Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: 59,431 23,5 78,57 161,51 19, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $5,688,91 Sources of Funding $5,695,573 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 2% Subsidy 65% Passenger Fares 2% Lottery 5% PwD Program 2% Area Agency on Aging <1% Shared-Ride Admin 2% Shared-Ride Operating 6% Other 1% MH/ID 5% MATP 2% Financial data is unaudited. Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 15 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

160 (Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA) ATA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 7, 6, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips 3, 25, 2, Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips RURAL SYSTEMS 4, 15, 3, 2, 1, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

161 BTA (Butler Transit Authority) Butler Transit Authority 13 Hollywood Drive, Suite 11 Butler, PA 161 Mr. John H. Paul, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Butler: 8, 1, 11, 12, 64 Senate District Butler: 21, 4, 41, 5 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 25 Population: 31,84 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.25 Last Base Fare Increase: July 212 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 2,293 Senior Passengers: 4,17 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 186,244 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 14,611 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $83,352 Required Local Match: $43,124 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 4 6 Paratransit: Subcontractor: 1 6 System-wide: Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 6 Paratransit: System-wide: 6 Community transportation provided by Butler County Community Action and Development (see page 24) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Purchased Trans $783 Operating Expense ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $1,725 $1,725 Other $328 Local $43 Revenue $185 State $727 Other Salaries & Wages $252 Maint. $48 Fuel Utils $27 Fringes $17 Federal $77 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 152 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

162 (Butler Transit Authority) BTA Operating Expense Per Passenger $1 $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $14 $14 $12 $12 $1 $1 $8 $8 $6 $6 $4 $4 $2 $2 $ $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY RURAL SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2 $ $12 $1 $8 8 4 $6 $4 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

163 CCCT (Carbon County Community Transit) Carbon County Community Transit 46 East Locust Street Nesquehoning, PA 1824 Mr. Owen O Neil Executive Director Customer Service: House District Carbon: 122 Senate District Carbon: 14, 29 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 64 Population: 25,419 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.5 Last Base Fare Increase: Oct 28 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 7,418 Senior Passengers: 4,89 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 4,227 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 3,29 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $233,917 Required Local Match: $33,87 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: Paratransit: Subcontractor: 25 9 System-wide: 25 9 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 1 Paratransit: 25 System-wide: 26 Purchased Trans $126 Operating Expense ( s) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Funds ( s) $139 $139 Local $14 Revenue $6 Other $13 State $119 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 154 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

164 (Carbon County Community Transit) CCCT Operating Expense Per Passenger $21 $18 $15 $12 $9 $6 $3 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $4 $3 $2 $1 RURAL SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 4 $5 3 $4 2 $3 $2 1 $1 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

165 CCCT (Carbon County Community Transit) Community Transportation RURAL SYSTEMS Carbon County Community Transit 46 East Locust Street Nesquehoning, PA Mr. Owen O Neil, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Carbon County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,249 11, % Yes 1% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $18.98 $15.5 March 216 3,922 6,366 15,617 52,95 6, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $2,161,18 Sources of Funding $2,52,169 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 2% Passenger Fares Subsidy 3% 15% Lottery 25% PwD Program 5% Other 1% Shared- Ride Admin 6% Shared- Ride Operating 74% MATP 48% Area Agency on Aging 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 156 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

166 (Carbon County Community Transit) CCCT Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips RURAL SYSTEMS 5, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

167 CATA (Crawford Area Transportation Authority) Crawford Area Transportation Authority 214 Pine Street Meadville, PA Mr. Timothy Geibel, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Crawford: 6, 17, 65 Senate District Crawford: 5 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 12 Population: 2,6 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.25 Last Base Fare Increase: October 214 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 244,735 Senior Passengers: 36,488 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 263,182 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 17,493 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $725,19 Required Local Match: $34,44 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 12 7 Paratransit: System-wide: Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 7 Paratransit: 31 System-wide: 38 Other $272 Operating Expense ( s) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Funds ( s) $1,156 $1,156 Operator Salaries & Wages $317 Local $42 Revenue $175 Maint. $25 Fuel Utils $175 Fringes $122 Other Salaries & Wages $244 State $692 Federal $246 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 158 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

168 (Crawford Area Transportation Authority) CATA Operating Expense Per Passenger $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 RURAL SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 2 $75 16 $6 12 $45 8 $3 4 $15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

169 CATA (Crawford Area Transportation Authority) Community Transportation RURAL SYSTEMS Crawford Area Transportation Authority 214 Pine Street Meadville, PA Mr. Timothy Geibel, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Crawford County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: 1,13 88,765 14, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $18.81 $16.1 July ,492 4,51 5,733 48,735 12,91 14 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $1,138,471 Sources of Funding $1,152,845 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 13% Shared- Ride Operating 61% Passenger Fares 6% Subsidy 3% Other 8% MATP 21% Shared- Ride Admin 26% Area Agency on Aging 3% PwD Program 6% Lottery 53% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 16 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

170 (Crawford Area Transportation Authority) CATA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 4,5 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY RURAL SYSTEMS Total Shared-Ride Trips 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

171 DuFAST (DuBois, Falls Creek, Sandy Township Joint Transp. Authority) DuBois, Falls Creek, Sandy Township Joint Transportation Authority 178 Spider Lake Road DuBois, PA 1581 Ms. Kristen Vida, Executive Director Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 56 Population: 2,327 House District Clearfield: 75 Senate District Clearfield: 25 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.25 Last Base Fare Increase: July 29 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 57,696 Senior Passengers: 19,56 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 127,68 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 9,796 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $517,41 Required Local Match: $42,64 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 7 5 Paratransit: System-wide: 7 5 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 6 Paratransit: System-wide: 6 Community transportation provided by Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA (see page 15) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operator Salaries & Wages $185 Operating Expense ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $579 $579 Other Salaries & Wages $11 Local $42 Revenue $3 Fringes $77 Other $98 Maint. $31 Fuel Utils $78 State $57 Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. 162 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

172 (DuBois, Falls Creek, Sandy Township Joint Transp. Authority) DuFAST Operating Expense Per Passenger $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 RURAL SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 15 $75 12 $6 9 $45 6 $3 3 $15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

173 EMTA (Endless Mountains Transportation Authority) Endless Mountains Transportation Authority Route 22 Athens, PA 1881 Mr. William Nichols, Jr., CEO Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 726 Population: 61,852 House District Bradford: 68, 11 Sullivan: 11 Tioga: 68 Senate District Bradford: 23 Sullivan: 23 Tioga: 25 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1. Last Base Fare Increase: October 25 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 15,488 Senior Passengers: 12,989 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 429,867 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 2,38 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $819,265 Required Local Match: $57,69 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 1 4 Paratransit: System-wide: Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 16 Paratransit: 43 System-wide: 59 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Maint. $62 Fuel Utils $181 Operating Expense ( s) Other $173 Operating Funds ( s) $1,379 $1,379 Operator Salaries & Wages $412 Local $57 Revenue $174 State $545 Fringes $38 Other Salaries & Wages $244 Federal $63 Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. 164 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

174 (Endless Mountains Transportation Authority) EMTA $12 Operating Expense Per Passenger $9 $6 $3 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 RURAL SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 5 $75 4 $6 3 $45 2 $3 1 $15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

175 EMTA (Endless Mountains Transportation Authority) Community Transportation RURAL SYSTEMS Endless Mountains Transportation Authority Route 22 Athens, PA Mr. William Nichols, Jr., CEO Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Bradford, Sullivan, and Tioga Counties Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: 2, ,31 2, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $3.61 $25.93 July 215 3,611 7,483 29,465 67, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $2,478,793 Sources of Funding $2,478,793 Shared- Ride Admin 15% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 3% MATP 4% MH/ID 8% Other 3% Subsidy 4% Passenger Fares 2% Shared-Ride Operating 82% Area Agency on Aging 4% PwD Program 7% Lottery 32% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 166 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

176 (Endless Mountains Transportation Authority) EMTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $4. $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips RURAL SYSTEMS 5, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

177 IndiGO (Indiana County Transit Authority) Indiana County Transit Authority 1657 Saltsburg Avenue, P.O. Box 869 Indiana, PA 1571 Mr. John R. Kanyan, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Indiana: 6, 62, 66 Senate District Indiana: 41 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 54 Population: 65,5 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.3 Last Base Fare Increase: July 215 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 437,387 Senior Passengers: 12,53 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 396,283 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 31,45 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $1,418,42 Required Local Match: $54,427 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 35 5 Paratransit: 9 5 System-wide: 44 1 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 16 Paratransit: 14 System-wide: 3 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Other Salaries & Wages $478 Operating Expense ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $2,112 $2,112 Fringes $477 Fuel Utils $114 Local $55 Revenue $686 Maint. $131 State $1,94 Operator Salaries & Wages $759 Other $148 Purchased Trans $5 Federal $277 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 168 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

178 (Indiana County Transit Authority) IndiGO Operating Expense Per Passenger $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $24 $21 $18 $15 $12 $9 $6 $3 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY RURAL SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 5 $9 4 $ $6 $45 $3 1 $15 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

179 IndiGO (Indiana County Transit Authority) Community Transportation RURAL SYSTEMS Indiana County Transit Authority 1657 Saltsburg Avenue, P.O. Box 869 Indiana, PA Mr. John R. Kanyan, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Indiana County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,88 13, % No N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $17.96 $15.3 July , ,357 26,653 29, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $1,573,81 Sources of Funding $1,577,78 Shared- Ride Operating 27% Subsidy 9% Passenger Fares 1% Lottery 23% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 61% Shared- Ride Admin 12% MATP 62% PwD Program 1% Area Agency on Aging 4% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 17 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

180 (Indiana County Transit Authority) IndiGO Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 3, 25, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips RURAL SYSTEMS 15, 8 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

181 Mid County Transit Authority Mid County Transit Authority 22 North Grant Avenue Kittanning, PA 1621 Ms. Patti Lynn Baker, General Manager Customer Service: House District Armstrong: 6, 63 Senate District Armstrong: 41 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 24 Population: 17,61 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.25 Last Base Fare Increase: April 212 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 45,18 Senior Passengers: 14,914 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 125,62 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 7,864 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $546,849 Required Local Match: $38,41 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 7 2 Paratransit: 14 5 System-wide: 21 7 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 6 Paratransit: 23 System-wide: 29 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Other Salaries & Wages $131 Operating Expense ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $568 $568 Fringes $153 Local $38 Revenue $38 Federal $214 State $278 Operator Salaries & Wages $18 Other $7 Maint. $38 Fuel Utils $68 Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. 172 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

182 Mid County Transit Authority Operating Expense Per Passenger $15 $12 $9 $6 $3 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $8 $8 $7 $7 $6 $6 $5 $5 $4 $4 $3 $3 $2 $2 $1 $1 $ $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY RURAL SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

183 Mid County Transit Authority Community Transportation RURAL SYSTEMS Mid County Transit Authority 22 North Grant Avenue Kittanning, PA Ms. Patti Lynn Baker, General Manager Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Armstrong County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,941 12, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $18.67 $15.61 July ,969 5,115 6,51 36, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $795,438 Sources of Funding $795,438 Shared- Ride Admin 35% Other <1% MH/ID 11% MATP 2% Subsidy 13% Passenger Fares 6% Shared- Ride Operating 65% Area Agency on Aging 7% PwD Program 12% Lottery 49% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 174 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

184 Mid County Transit Authority Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 25, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips 6, 5, Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips RURAL SYSTEMS 2, 4, 15, 3, 1, 2, 5, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

185 MCTA (Monroe County Transportation Authority) Monroe County Transportation Authority P.O. Box 339 Scotrun, PA Ms. Peggy Howarth, Executive Director Customer Service: Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 417 Population: 141,292 House District Monroe: 115, 176, 189 Senate District Monroe: 22, 4 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.5 Last Base Fare Increase: July, 214 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 243,11 Senior Passengers: 26,464 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 516,674 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 33,713 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $1,766,626 Required Local Match: $14,951 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: Paratransit: System-wide: 54 6 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 15 Paratransit: 39 System-wide: 54 Other Salaries & Wages $698 Operating Expense ( s) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Funds ( s) $2,946 $2,946 Fringes $627 Local $141 Revenue $312 Operator Salaries & Wages $669 Other $43 Purchased Trans $34 Fuel Utils $362 Maint. $153 State $1,411 Federal $1,82 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 176 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

186 (Monroe County Transportation Authority) MCTA Operating Expense Per Passenger $18 $15 $12 $9 $6 $3 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $25 $25 $2 $2 $15 $15 $1 $1 $5 $5 $ $ FY9-1 FY1-11 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY RURAL SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $12 $12 $1 $1 $8 $8 $6 $6 $4 $4 $2 $2 $ $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

187 MCTA (Monroe County Transportation Authority) Community Transportation RURAL SYSTEMS Monroe County Transportation Authority P.O. Box 339 Scotrun, PA Ms. Peggy Howarth, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Monroe County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,842 21, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $23.74 $19.44 July ,15 1,93 22,581 68,824 24,51 24 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $2,241,12 Sources of Funding $2,241,12 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 13% MATP 35% MH/ID <1% Other 2% Subsidy 13% Passenger Fares 5% Shared- Ride Admin 28% Shared- Ride Operating 59% Area Agency on Aging 3% PwD Program 9% Lottery 33% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 178 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

188 (Monroe County Transportation Authority) MCTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 35, 3, 25, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips 12, 1, 8, Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips RURAL SYSTEMS 2, 6, 15, 1, 5, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

189 BMC (Mount Carmel, Borough of) Borough of Mount Carmel 137 West 4th Street Mount Carmel, PA Mr. Victor Girardi, Transit Director House District Northumberland: 17 Senate District Northumberland: 27 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 5 Population: 29,713 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1. Last Base Fare Increase: August 27 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 29,25 Senior Passengers: 13,13 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 61,273 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 5,58 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $273,664 Required Local Match: $11,52 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 1 1 Paratransit: Subcontractor: 2 5 System-wide: 3 6 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 4 Paratransit: System-wide: 4 Community transportation provided by Northumberland County Transportation (see page 23) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Purchased Trans $192 Operating Expense ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $291 $291 Other $9 Local $11 Revenue $12 Maint. $4 Fuel Utils $34 Other Salaries & Wages $52 State $268 Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. 18 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

190 (Mount Carmel, Borough of) BMC Operating Expense Per Passenger $3 $25 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $3 $2 $2 $1 $1 RURAL SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 6 $12 5 $1 4 $8 3 $6 2 $4 1 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Reported ridership prior to FY was overstated. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

191 NCATA (New Castle Area Transit Authority) New Castle Area Transit Authority 311 Mahoning Avenue New Castle, PA 1612 Mr. Leonard L. Lastoria, General Manager Customer Service: House District Lawrence: 9, 1, 17 Senate District Lawrence: 47, 5 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 178 Population: 74,88 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1. Last Base Fare Increase: March 212 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 593,43 Senior Passengers: 8,221 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 1,19,26 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 55,2 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $3,887,427 Required Local Match: $191,333 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 5 4 Paratransit: Subcontractor: 9 14 System-wide: Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 34 Paratransit: System-wide: 34 Community transportation provided by Allied Coordinated Transportation Services, Inc. (see page 198) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Other Salaries & Wages $662 Operating Expense ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $6,34 $6,34 Fringes $2,548 Local $191 Revenue $1,43 Fuel Utils $672 State $3,148 Operator Salaries & Wages $1,397 Other $598 Purchased Trans $57 Maint. $46 Federal $1,958 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 182 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

192 (New Castle Area Transit Authority) NCATA Operating Expense Per Passenger $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1,4 1,2 1, $25 $2 $15 $1 $5 RURAL SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 7 $14 6 $12 5 $1 4 $8 3 $6 2 $4 1 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1,4 25 1,2 1, FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Reported ridership prior to FY was overstated. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

193 STS (Schuylkill Transportation System) Schuylkill Transportation System 252 Industrial Park Road St. Clair, PA 1797 Mr. David Bekisz, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Schuylkill: 123, 124, 125 Senate District Schuylkill: 29 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 277 Population: 97,441 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.4 Last Base Fare Increase: July 215 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 28,5 Senior Passengers: 61,63 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 39,593 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 17,61 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $1,435,58 Required Local Match: $55,874 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 18 2 Paratransit: 11 1 System-wide: Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 12 Paratransit: 27 System-wide: 39 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Other Salaries & Wages $421 Operating Expense ( s) Operating Funds ( s) $1,721 $1,721 Fringes $383 Fuel Utils $25 Local $56 Revenue $21 Federal $44 Maint. $17 Operator Salaries & Wages $39 Other $155 Purchased Trans $15 State $1,6 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 184 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

194 (Schuylkill Transportation System) STS Operating Expense Per Passenger $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 RURAL SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 25 $12 2 $ $8 $6 $4 5 $2 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

195 STS (Schuylkill Transportation System) Community Transportation RURAL SYSTEMS Schuylkill Transportation System 252 Industrial Park Road St. Clair, PA Mr. David Bekisz, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Schuylkill County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,289 26, % Yes 24.% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $17.56 $15.4 July ,278 11,775 15,965 73,18 36,66 2 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $2,47,785 Sources of Funding $2,4,452 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 18% Shared- Ride Operating 63% Subsidy 2% Passenger Fares 7% Lottery 28% Shared- Ride Admin 19% Other 13% MATP 23% PwD Program 7% Area Agency on Aging 2% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 186 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

196 (Schuylkill Transportation System) STS Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips RURAL SYSTEMS 1, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

197 VCTO (Venango County Transportation Office) Venango County Transportation Office 1 Dale Avenue Franklin, PA Ms. Karen Clark, Transportation Specialist Customer Service: House District Venango: 64 Senate District Venango: 21 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 1 Population: 33,759 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1.5 Last Base Fare Increase: July 25 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 52,151 Senior Passengers: 1,411 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 172,68 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 9,236 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $383,979 Required Local Match: $24,146 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 4 2 Paratransit: 1 6 System-wide: 14 8 Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 5 Paratransit: 21 System-wide: 26 Other Salaries & Wages $86 Operating Expense ( s) FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Operating Funds ( s) $488 $488 Fringes $96 Local $24 Revenue $63 Operator Salaries & Wages $145 Other $59 Fuel Utils $78 Maint. $24 State $41 Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. 188 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

198 (Venango County Transportation Office) VCTO Operating Expense Per Passenger $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 RURAL SYSTEMS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour 1 $6 8 $5 6 4 $4 $3 $2 2 $1 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

199 VCTO (Venango County Transportation Office) Community Transportation RURAL SYSTEMS Venango County Transportation Office 1 Dale Avenue Franklin, PA Ms. Karen Clark, Transportation Specialist Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Venango County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,984 9, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $17.23 $13.69 April ,37 24,545 38, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $1,85,534 Sources of Funding $1,968,487 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 49% Shared- Ride Operating 27% MH/ID 5% Other 3% Passenger Fares 8% Lottery 11% Shared- Ride Admin 24% MATP 71% Area Agency on Aging 2% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 19 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

200 (Venango County Transportation Office) VCTO Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips VCTO does not provide shared-ride service through the Persons with Disabilities Program. RURAL SYSTEMS 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 45, 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

201 TAWC (Warren County, Transit Authority of) Transit Authority of Warren County 42 Clark Street Warren, PA Mr. John Aldrich, Executive Director Customer Service: House District Warren: 65 Senate District Warren: 21, 25 Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Square Miles: 279 Population: 25,626 Current Fare Information Fixed Route Base: $1. Last Base Fare Increase: July 212 RURAL SYSTEMS Act 44 Fixed Route Distribution Factors Total Passengers: 65,888 Senior Passengers: 8,757 Revenue Vehicle Miles: 192,913 Revenue Vehicle Hours: 1,712 Act 44 Operating Assistance Section 1513 Allocation: $599,733 Required Local Match: $38,256 Current Employees Full-Time Part-Time Fixed Route: 6 5 Paratransit: 5 6 Subcontractor: 2 System-wide: Current Fleet Size Fixed Route: 5 Paratransit: 17 System-wide: 22 FIXED-ROUTE OPERATING BUDGET Maint. $55 Operating Expense ( s) Other $78 Operating Funds ( s) $84 $84 Operator Salaries & Wages $191 Local $39 Revenue $71 Federal $75 Fuel Utils $198 Fringes $25 Other Salaries & Wages $112 State $655 Expense includes ADA complementary expense. Some contracted maintenance may be reported as Other Services. Revenue includes ADA complementary revenue. 192 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

202 (Warren County, Transit Authority of) TAWC Operating Expense Per Passenger $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY RURAL SYSTEMS Revenue Vehicle Hours ( s) Operating Expense Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Ridership Per Revenue Vehicle Hour FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY FY1-11 FY11-12 FY FY FY Passengers include ADA complementary passengers. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

203 TAWC (Warren County, Transit Authority of) Community Transportation RURAL SYSTEMS Transit Authority of Warren County 42 Clark Street Warren, PA Mr. John Aldrich, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Warren County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: ,815 7, % Yes 9.8% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: $13.87 $11.82 September 21 26, ,396 32, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET Operating Expenses $82,163 Sources of Funding $819,68 Shared- Ride Admin 9% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 45% MATP 15% Other 38% Shared- Ride Operating 46% Area Agency on Aging 6% PwD Program 1% Lottery 39% Passenger Fares 1% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 194 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

204 (Warren County, Transit Authority of) TAWC Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip PwD Shared-Ride Trips RURAL SYSTEMS 5, 1 FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Total Shared-Ride Trips 45, 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

205 RURAL SYSTEMS intentionally blank 196 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

206 Section V Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

207 ACTS (Allied Coordinated Transportation Services, Inc.) Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Allied Coordinated Transportation Services, Inc. 241 West Grant Street New Castle, PA Mr. Thomas Scott, CEO Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Lawrence County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 9% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,256, ,18 17, % Yes N/A Passenger Fares 3% Subsidy 1% Sources of Funding Lottery 27% $1,276,826 PwD Program 2% $15.62 $12.61 July ,545 1,482 44,467 73,494 3, Area Agency on Aging 1% Shared- Ride Admin 4% Shared- Ride Operating 87% Other 24% MH/ID 12% MATP 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 198 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

208 (Allied Coordinated Transportation Services, Inc.) ACTS Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

209 Blair Senior Services, Inc. Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Blair Senior Services, Inc. 132 Twelfth Avenue Altoona, PA Mr. Steve Williamson, President Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Blair County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 8% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $2,762, ,89 22, % Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 18% Yes N/A Area Agency on Aging 7% PwD Program 1% Sources of Funding MATP 23% $2,651,49 $18.2 $15.13 September 214 MH/ID 1% 8,75 1,969 37,743 12, Other 18% Shared- Ride Operating 74% Lottery 46% Passenger Fares 4% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 2 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

210 Blair Senior Services, Inc. Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $2. $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

211 Bucks County Transport, Inc. Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Bucks County Transport, Inc. P.O. Box 51 Holicong, PA Mr. Vincent Volpe, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Bucks County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared-Ride Admin 5% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,654, ,249 91, % Yes 18.97% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 55% Passenger Fares 3% Subsidy 1% Sources of Funding Lottery 27% $1,787,64 $23.2 $19.38 October 212 PwD Program 2% 22,821 35,938 1,633 24, , Area Agency on Aging 1% Shared-Ride Operating 4% Other 24% MH/ID 12% MATP 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 22 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

212 Bucks County Transport, Inc. Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

213 Butler County Community Action Community Transportation Butler County Community Action & Development 124 West Diamond Street P.O. Box 128 Butler, PA Ms. Janine Kennedy, Director Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: $16.73 $13.77 January 213 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Butler County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 4% Operating Expenses ,862 27, % Yes 1% Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $982,743 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 1% Other 23% Sources of Funding Subsidy 4% $1,62,917 33,94 1,589 16,742 6, Passenger Fares 5% MH/ID 4% Shared- Ride Operating 95% MATP <1% Area Agency on Aging 7% PwD Program 14% Lottery 43% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 24 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

214 Butler County Community Action Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $2. $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 5, 45, 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

215 Centre County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Centre County excluding State College Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 2% Centre County Office of Transportation 42 Holmes Street Bellefonte, PA Mr. David Lomison, Director Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,73, ,99 4, % Yes N/A Shared- Ride Operating 67% Passenger Fares 1% Subsidy 1% Other 12% Sources of Funding $1,692,143 Lottery 29% $16.34 $13.14 April 29 36,218 5,19 45,637 86,874 3,4 23 PwD Program 5% Shared- Ride Admin 13% MH/ID 18% MATP 24% Area Agency on Aging 1% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 26 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

216 Centre County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 1, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

217 ROVER/Chester County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION ROVER Community Transportation 12 South Chestnut Street Downingtown, PA Mr. Wayne Robinson, General Manager Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Chester County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 25% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $9,571, ,886 63, % Yes 5.99% Other 27% Sources of Funding Subsidy 4% $9,244,988 $22.45 $15.6 July ,698 33,89 99, ,899 68,21 Passenger Fares 5% 65 Lottery 23% Shared- Ride Admin 12% Shared- Ride Operating 63% MH/ID 5% MATP 27% PwD Program 7% Area Agency on Aging 2% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 28 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

218 ROVER/Chester County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 2, 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

219 Clarion County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Clarion County Transportation 338 Amsler Avenue, Suite 1 Shippenville, PA Ms. Mary Lutz, Administrative Officer Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Clarion County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared-Ride Admin 77% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,156, ,988 6, % Yes 1% MATP 44% Sources of Funding $1,156,88 $34.9 $28.6 July 213 MH/ID 5% 12, ,387 23, Other 1% Shared- Ride Operating <1% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 23% Area Agency on Aging 5% PwD Program 1% Lottery 3% Subsidy 5% Passenger Fares <1% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 21 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

220 Clarion County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $45. $4. $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

221 Cumberland County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Cumberland County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 14% Cumberland County Transportation Department 161 Ritner Highway Carlisle, PA Mr. Richard Farr, Executive Director Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $2,26, ,46 36, % Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 7% Yes N/A MH/ID 42% Sources of Funding $2,369,626 Other 4% Subsidy 1% $15.57 $11.38 July ,28 1,384 73,22 127,812 5, Passenger Fares 1% Lottery 23% Shared- Ride Operating 79% MATP 15% PwD Program 6% Area Agency on Aging 8% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 212 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

222 Cumberland County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 5, 45, 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

223 Delaware County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Community Transit of Delaware County 26 Eddystone Avenue Eddystone, PA Mr. Tom Giancristoforo, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Delaware County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 5% Operating Expenses ,979 79, % Yes 5.15% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $15,8,247 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 54% MATP 35% Sources of Funding $15,671,119 $32.21 $26.39 August ,16 1,565 8,752 23, ,85 Other 41% 49 Shared- Ride Operating 41% Area Agency on Aging 1% PwD Program <1% Lottery 2% Subsidy 1% Passenger Fares 2% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 214 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

224 Delaware County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $4. $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY ,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

225 Forest County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Forest County Transportation Forest County Building Marienville, PA Ms. Brenda McCanna, Acting Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Forest County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 26% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $46, ,716 1, % Yes N/A Area Agency on Aging 8% MATP 21% Sources of Funding $47,84 Other 9% $27.56 $22.39 January 215 1, ,335 13,4 317 Subsidy <1% 11 Passenger Fares 1% Shared- Ride Operating 74% PwD Program 3% Lottery 58% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 216 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

226 Forest County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

227 Franklin County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Franklin County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 37% Franklin County Transportation 191 Franklin Farm Lane Chambersburg, PA Mr, Richard Farr, Executive Director Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,3, ,618 24, % Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 11% Yes N/A MATP 39% MH/ID <1% Sources of Funding Other 7% $1,3,68 $18.27 $15.15 January 212 2,983 5,68 2,126 46,177 9,69 Subsidy 15% 25 Passenger Fares 2% Shared- Ride Operating 52% Area Agency on Aging 6% PwD Program 6% Lottery 25% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 218 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

228 Franklin County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

229 Greene County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Greene County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 22% Greene County Transportation Department 19 Jefferson Road Waynesburg, PA Ms. Karen Bennett, Administrator Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,26, ,686 5, % Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 1% Yes N/A Other 5% Sources of Funding $1,256,546 Subsidy 11% $24.8 $18.37 June ,364 5,465 21,78 41, Passenger Fares 2% Lottery 22% Shared- Ride Operating 68% MATP 51% PwD Program 7% Area Agency on Aging 2% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 22 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

230 Greene County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

231 Huntingdon, Bedford, and Fulton Counties Community Transportation Huntingdon-Bedford-Fulton Area Agency on Aging 24 Wood Street Bedford, PA Ms. Connie Brode, Executive Director Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: $17.29 $15.5 November 211 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Huntingdon, Bedford, and Fulton Counties Square Miles: 2,326 Population: 11, Population: 19,478 % of Population 65 and older: 17.6% MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Operating Expenses Yes N/A Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,91,199 Shared- Ride Operating 83% Passenger Fares 11% Subsidy 2% Sources of Funding $1,91,199 7,71 7,174 27,452 15,327 Lottery 56% 45 Other 4% MATP 17% Shared- Ride Admin 17% Area Agency on Aging 5% PwD Program 5% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 222 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

232 Huntingdon, Bedford, and Fulton Counties Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $2. $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

233 CARS (Mifflin and Juniata Counties) Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Call-A-Ride Service 249 West Third Street Lewistown, PA Ms. Cynthia Sunderland, Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Mifflin and Juniata Counties Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 4% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $987, ,318 12, % Shared- Ride Operating 79% Yes N/A Passenger Fares 4% Subsidy 1% Other 1% Sources of Funding $1,2,911 $23.1 $15.65 May 213 Lottery 36% 23,519 2,17 21,222 46, PwD Program 3% Shared- Ride Admin 17% MATP 51% Area Agency on Aging 4% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 224 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

234 ( Mifflin and Juniata Counties) CARS Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

235 Montour County Transit Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Montour County Transit 112 Woodbine Lane, Suite 1 Danville, PA Mr. Shawn Mowery, Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Montour County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $425,384 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 36% ,267 3, % Yes N/A Sources of Funding Other 11% $443,112 Passenger Fares 3% $1.22 $8.61 May 25 13,168 2,119 5,437 2,724 4,89 7 Lottery 28% PwD Program 4% Shared- Ride Admin 24% Shared- Ride Operating 4% MATP 51% Area Agency on Aging 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 226 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

236 Montour County Transit Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

237 MTR Transportation, Inc./Columbia County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION MTR Transportation tbda K-Cab, Inc. P.O. Box 23 Berwick, PA Mr. Richard Farr, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Columbia County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 23% Operating Expenses ,295 1, % Yes N/A Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $876,262 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 9% MATP 24% Sources of Funding $963,377 Other 6% $17.36 $15.1 January 216 3,318 7,86 12,39 5,217 5, Passenger Fares 4% Shared- Ride Operating 68% Area Agency on Aging 9% PwD Program 11% Lottery 46% Financial data is unaudited. Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 228 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

238 MTR Transportation, Inc./Columbia County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $2. $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

239 Northumberland County Community Transportation Northumberland County Transportation 61 Tyler Avenue Elysburg, PA Mr. Richard Farr, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Northumberland County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: 46 94,528 17, % Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: $19.58 $14.51 July ,691 6,735 61,273 14,699 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 35% Operating Expenses Yes 6.9% Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,792,241 MH/ID 15% Sources of Funding $2,41,68 Other 1% 3 Passenger Fares 1% Lottery 18% Shared- Ride Admin 4% Shared- Ride Operating 61% MATP 51% Area Agency on Aging 2% PwD Program 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 23 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

240 Northumberland County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

241 Perry County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Shared- Ride Admin 12% Perry County Transportation Authority 151 Red Hill Road Newport, PA Ms. Stacey Nybeck, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Perry County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,254,878 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 31% ,969 6, % Yes 1.32% MH/ID 26% Sources of Funding Other 8% $1,468,219 Subsidy 1% $29.21 $23.75 August ,917 2,387 26,593 44,897 17, Passenger Fares 3% Lottery 26% Shared- Ride Operating 57% MATP 26% PwD Program 5% Area Agency on Aging 5% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 232 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

242 Perry County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $45. $4. $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY ,5 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 5, 45, 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

243 Pike County Community Transportation Pike County Transportation Department 56 Broad Street Milford, PA or Ms. Christine Kerstetter, Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Pike County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: ,369 9, % Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: $19.19 $16.16 October 29 18,768 2,86 6,263 27,891 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 16% Operating Expenses Yes N/A Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $929,88 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 15% Other 1% Subsidy 39% Sources of Funding $1,67,617 Passenger Fares 3% 23 Shared- Ride Operating 69% MATP 21% Area Agency on Aging 2% PwD Program 5% Lottery 29% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 234 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

244 Pike County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $4. $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 2, 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

245 Somerset County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Tableland Services, Inc. 535 East Main Street Somerset, PA Mr. David Mrozowski, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Somerset County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 66% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,378,555 1,75 77,742 14, % Shared- Ride Operating 23% Yes N/A Sources of Funding $1,393,46 Other 3% $14.39 $12.7 July ,392 3,185 12,152 3,729 5,717 9 Passenger Fares 2% Lottery 13% PwD Program 3% Shared- Ride Admin 11% MATP 76% Area Agency on Aging 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 236 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

246 Somerset County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $18. $16. $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY ,5 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

247 STEP, Inc./Lycoming and Clinton Counties Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION STEP, Inc Lincoln Street Williamsport, PA Mr. Jim Plankenhorn, President & CEO Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Lycoming and Clinton Counties Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 37% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $3,85,211 2, ,349 25, % Yes 21.% Other 34% Sources of Funding $4,5,56 Subsidy 1% $21.37 $17.45 April ,731 7,28 55,225 12,236 8,25 Passenger Fares 5% 44 Lottery 17% Shared- Ride Admin 13% Shared- Ride Operating 5% MATP 37% Area Agency on Aging 3% PwD Program 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 238 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

248 STEP, Inc./Lycoming and Clinton Counties Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

249 Suburban Transit/Montgomery County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Suburban Transit Network, Inc. 98 Harvest Drive, Suite 1 Blue Bell, PA Ms. Susan Kopystecki, Executive Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Montgomery County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 8% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $19,48, ,874 12, % Yes 1% Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 54% Sources of Funding $19,21,934 $27.38 $22.4 August ,7 15,665 94,254 36, ,774 Other 57% 193 MATP 12% Shared- Ride Operating 38% Area Agency on Aging 1% PwD Program 2% Lottery 23% Subsidy 2% Passenger Fares 3% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 24 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

250 Suburban Transit/Montgomery County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

251 Susquehanna County Transportation Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Susquehanna County Transportation 81 Industrial Dr., P.O. Box 366 Montrose, PA Ms. Ronalyn Corbin, Program Director Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Susquehanna County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 29% Operating Expenses 1,228 71,613 12, % Yes 7.49% Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,12,472 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 16% MATP 44% Sources of Funding $1,288,126 Other 2% $29.94 $24.82 March 213 Subsidy 1% 2,393 3,668 1,376 34,437 7, Passenger Fares 3% Shared- Ride Operating 55% Area Agency on Aging 5% PwD Program 6% Lottery 39% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 242 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

252 Susquehanna County Transportation Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

253 USTA (Union/Snyder Transportation Alliance) Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Union and Snyder Counties Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Shared- Ride Admin 12% Union/Snyder Transportation Alliance 713 Bridge St., Suite 11 Selinsgrove, PA Ms. Michelle Holman, Administrator Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,896,61 Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 26% ,649 12, % Yes N/A MH/ID 19% Sources of Funding $1,845,382 $19.8 $15.32 March 215 Other 2% 22,146 11,267 33,526 66,939 11,576 2 Passenger Fares 3% Shared- Ride Operating 62% MATP 27% Area Agency on Aging 1% Lottery 19% PwD Program 11% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 244 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

254 (Union/Snyder Transportation Alliance) USTA Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY , 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

255 Wayne County Community Transportation COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Wayne County Area Agency on Aging 323 1th Street Honesdale, PA Ms. Andrea Whyte, Administrator Service Area Statistics (21 Census) Wayne County Square Miles: Population: 65+ Population: % of Population 65 and older: MATP Provider: Percent of Service Subcontracted: Exclusive Human Service Program Contracts 4% Operating Expenses Fare Information Average Shared-Ride Fare: Cost to Commonwealth per Senior Citizen Trip: Fare Structure Implementation Date: Trip Information 65+ Trips: PwD Trips: Other Shared-Ride Trips: Total Shared-Ride Trips: Non-Public Trips: Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service Community Transportation: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION OPERATING BUDGET $1,369, ,822 1,28 19.% Shared- Ride Operating 82% Yes N/A Other 1% Passenger Fares 3% Sources of Funding $1,267,626 $26.39 $21.17 March 216 Lottery 44% 26,576 3,141 13,376 43,93 6, MH/ID 2% PwD Program 5% Shared- Ride Admin 14% MATP 37% Area Agency on Aging 8% Operating Expenses and Sources of Funding percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 246 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

256 Wayne County Agency Service Area Shared-Ride Fare Recovery $35. $3. $25. $2. $15. $1. $5. $. FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Avg. Shared-Ride Fare Avg. Shared-Ride Cost per Trip 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 65+ Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY ,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 PwD Shared-Ride Trips FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION Total Shared-Ride Trips 5, 45, 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, FY 1-11 FY FY FY FY Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

257 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION intentionally blank 248 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

258 Section VI Capital Project Highlights CAPITAL HIGHLIGHTS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

259 CAPITAL HIGHLIGHTS Intentionally blank 25 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

260 Capital Project Highlights in Pennsylvania Public Transportation In 213, Act 89 was passed as a comprehensive transportation funding package that provides $2.3 billion in additional funding over a five-year period for road projects, bridge repairs, and public transportation improvements. This newly established, dedicated funding stream allows the Commonwealth to remain economically competitive with neighboring states and demonstrates a commitment to bringing the statewide transportation system into a state of good repair. The legislation also established a multimodal fund which allocates funding to ports, freight and passenger rail, aviation, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian projects. Act 89 benefits public transportation by reinforcing funding for transit operations and creating nearly $5 million in additional revenue to fund mass transit capital projects by FY Capital program funding accounts for approximately one-third of dedicated public transportation funding in Pennsylvania, and transit agencies are already experiencing measureable improvements as a result. The following pages highlight eight capital projects completed in FY that were made possible using capital funding assistance provided by the Bureau of Public Transportation. FY Capital Project Highlights CAPITAL HIGHLIGHTS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

261 Capital Project Highlights Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) CAPITAL HIGHLIGHTS The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) completed the $31.5 million reconstruction of the historic Wayne Junction Station, which serves over 321, riders annually. Located in the City of Philadelphia, Wayne Junction Station has been a regionally significant transportation hub since it was opened by the Reading Railroad in Currently, the station acts as a multi-modal transfer point between six of SEPTA s regional rail lines, as well as three major transit routes - the Route 75 Trackless Trolley, and Bus Routes 23 and 53. SEPTA worked closely with the community to ensure the success of the project, which aimed to retain the station's historic significance while also positioning it to be at the center of economic growth in the surrounding neighborhoods. Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) The Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) recognizes that timely replacement of its revenue vehicle fleet is an integral part of maintaining long-term financial stability and providing excellent customer service. During FY , PAAC expended a total of $38.6 million to replace 9 vehicles that had exceeded their useful life. 252 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

262 Capital Project Highlights Centre Area Transportation Authority (CATA) In 215, the Centre Area Transportation Authority (CATA) began expanding its bus storage, maintenance and administration facilities to accommodate the system s continuing growth through a $4 million project. The new facility will feature a larger administration building, a new fueling area that will accommodate articulated buses, and a new storage building that is able to accommodate approximately 1 buses. The construction of the new facility is scheduled to be completed in the fall of 217. County of Lackawanna Transit System (COLTS) CAPITAL HIGHLIGHTS The County of Lackawanna Transit System (COLTS) held a ribbon-cutting ceremony on November 2, 215 for the new $13 million multi-modal Lackawanna Transit Center (LTC), located at 3 Lackawanna Avenue, next to the State Building in Scranton. The 6,2 square foot facility officially opened on January 4, 216. The LTC has bays for eight COLTS buses, as well as two layover spaces within the bus loop and additional layover space on Lackawanna Avenue. The building is a modern, climate-controlled, cost-effective and environmentally friendly facility. Passengers have access to real-time arrival and departure information, as well as indoor seating, vending machines and public restrooms. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

263 Capital Project Highlights Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority CAPITAL HIGHLIGHTS The Erie Metropolitan Transit Authority (EMTA) is reconstructing and expanding its bus maintenance and storage facility at 127 East 14th Street in Erie, Pennsylvania. The nine acre project site will include space for relocating EMTA s existing shared ride LIFT facility, which is currently located several blocks away. A $34 million Phase I construction project on the maintenance area, support area, and bus storage area for the LIFT buses commenced in early 214 and finished in November 215. Freedom Transit (formerly Washington City Transit & Washington County Transportation Authority) In spring 215, a new $4 million Intermodal Transit Facility opened to the public in Washington, PA. The project was funded through Washington City Transit, which merged with Washington County Transportation Authority in July 215 to form Freedom Transit. The new facility serves as the main transfer point for all public transit trips traveling through Washington, serviced by Freedom Transit. In addition to bus service, the facility provides administrative offices, a large conference room, a break room, a reception and passenger waiting area, and public parking for visitors and park & riders. 254 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

264 Capital Project Highlights York Adams Transportation Authority (YATA) CAPITAL HIGHLIGHTS In 215, rabbittransit renovated its administrative offices for the Adams County division in Gettysburg, PA. Originally housed in a cinderblock building from the 194s, significant interior damage required a complete demolition. The $1 million renovation was completed in February 215 and serves as the depot for bus departures, as well as a customer service location for members of the public to purchase tickets, obtain applications and access other informational resources. Union Snyder Transportation Alliance (USTA) The Union/Snyder Transportation Alliance (USTA) recently moved its administrative and operations offices to a new building, which was provided by Snyder County. The new facility was renovated to accommodate the agency s day-to -day functions and a $345, bus shelter was built on-site to house USTA s fleet. Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

265 CAPITAL HIGHLIGHTS intentionally blank 256 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

266 Section VII Intercity Bus INTERCITY BUS Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

267 Intercity Bus Program Intercity Bus Program: Serves 4 counties Provides opportunities to travel into and outside of the state Service Provided: Scheduled Route Service (S) Charter (C) Group and Party (G) School Bus Service (SB) Tours (T) Subsidized Carriers: Carl R. Bieber, Inc. The Fullington Auto Bus Co. Greyhound Lines, Inc. Myers Coach Lines, Inc. Susquehanna Transit Co. Average Fare: $15.18 Total Number of Vehicles: Service Type: S,C,G S,C,G,SB S,C,G S,C,G S,C,G,SB 41 coaches Carriers and Routes Served: Carl R. Bieber, Inc.: Reading Philadelphia Pottsville Philadelphia The Fullington Auto Bus Company: State College Harrisburg Pittsburgh Bradford State College Wilkes-Barre State College Pittsburgh DuBois Harrisburg Scranton - Harrisburg Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Philadelphia Scranton Pittsburgh Erie Harrisburg Pittsburgh Myers Coach Lines, Inc.: Pittsburgh Grove City Susquehanna Transit Company: Williamsport Philadelphia Williamsport Easton Harrisburg Elmira, NY INTERCITY BUS State $1,91 OPERATING FUNDS ( s) OPERATING FUNDS ( s) $13,77 Local $2,119 Revenue $5,662 Federal $3, Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

268 Intercity Bus Program Operating Expense Per Passenger $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Vehicle Mile 6 $2.5 5 $ $1.5 $1. 1 $.5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Total Bus Trips ( s) Operating Expense Per Vehicle Mile $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1. INTERCITY BUS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Subsidy Per Vehicle Mile 4, $2. 3, $1.5 2, $1. 1, $.5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

269 Carl R. Bieber, Inc. Carl R. Bieber, Inc. P.O. Box 18 Kutztown, PA Mr. Steven G. Haddad, President Customer Service: Intercity Bus Program: Serves 8 counties Provides opportunities to travel into and outside of the state Communities Served by Carl R. Bieber, Inc.: Communities Served by Reading Philadelphia: Reading, Kutztown, Wescosville, Allentown, Bethlehem, Quakertown, and Philadelphia Communities Served by Pottsville Philadelphia: Kutztown, Pottsville, Schuylkill Haven, Reading, Pottstown, Norristown, and Philadelphia Subsidized Routes: Reading Philadelphia Pottsville Philadelphia Service Provided: Scheduled Route Service Charter Group and Party Average Fare: $12.84 Total Number of Vehicles: 6 coaches INTERCITY BUS OPERATING FUNDS ( s) OPERATING FUNDS ( s) $2,957 Federal $621 State $325 Revenue $1,687 Local $ Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

270 Carl R. Bieber, Inc. Operating Expense Per Passenger $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Vehicle Mile 25 $3. 2 $ $2. $1.5 $1. 5 $.5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Total Bus Trips ( s) Operating Expense Per Vehicle Mile $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1. INTERCITY BUS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Subsidy Per Vehicle Mile 1,2 $2.5 1, $ $1.5 $1. 2 $.5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

271 The Fullington Auto Bus Company INTERCITY BUS The Fullington Auto Bus Company P.O. Box East Cherry Street Clearfield, PA 1683 Mr. Jonathan T. Berzas, CEO Customer Service: Intercity Bus Program: Serves 18 counties Provides opportunities to travel into and outside of the state Subsidized Routes: State College Harrisburg Pittsburgh Bradford State College Wilkes-Barre State College Pittsburgh DuBois Harrisburg Scranton Harrisburg Service Provided: Scheduled Route Service Charter Group and Party School Average Fare: $15.1 Total Number of Vehicles: Local $745 8 coaches OPERATING FUNDS ( s) OPERATING FUNDS ( s) $3,521 Communities Served by Fullington: Communities Served by State College Harrisburg: State College, Lewistown, Mifflintown, Thompsontown, Millerstown, Newport, Duncannon, and Harrisburg Communities Served by Pittsburgh Bradford: Pittsburgh, Monroeville, Delmont, Blairsville, Indiana, Punxsutawney, Big Run, Sykesville, DuBois, St. Marys, Johnsonburg, Wilcox, Kane, and Bradford Communities Served by State College Wilkes- Barre: State College, Bellefonte, Lock Haven, Williamsport, Hughesville, Red Rock, Dallas, and Wilkes-Barre Communities Served by State College Pittsburgh: State College, Philipsburg, Clearfield, DuBois, Sykesville, Big Run, Punxsutawney, Indiana, Blairsville, Delmont, Monroeville, Pittsburgh, and Pittsburgh Airport Communities Served by DuBois Harrisburg: DuBois, Clearfield, Philipsburg, State College, Lewistown, Mifflintown, and Harrisburg Communities Served by Scranton Harrisburg: Scranton, Wilkes-Barre, Hazleton, Pottsville, and Harrisburg Revenue $1,44 State $635 Federal $1, Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

272 The Fullington Auto Bus Company Operating Expense Per Passenger $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Vehicle Mile FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $1.8 $1.6 $1.4 $1.2 $1. $.8 $.6 $.4 $.2 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Total Bus Trips ( s) Operating Expense Per Vehicle Mile $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1. INTERCITY BUS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Subsidy Per Vehicle Mile 1,2 $3. 1, $2.5 8 $2. 6 $1.5 4 $1. 2 $.5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

273 Greyhound Lines, Inc. Greyhound Lines, Inc. 35 North St. Paul Street Dallas, TX 7521 Ms. LePhan Quach Customer Service: Intercity Bus Program: Serves 16 counties Provides opportunities to travel into and outside of the state Subsidized Routes: Philadelphia Scranton Pittsburgh Erie Harrisburg Pittsburgh Communities Served by Greyhound: Communities Served by Philadelphia Scranton: Scranton, Mt. Pocono, Stroudsburg, Easton, Doylestown, and Philadelphia Communities Served by Pittsburgh Erie: Pittsburgh, Zelienople, New Castle, Meadville, Edinboro University, and Erie Communities Served by Harrisburg Pittsburgh: Harrisburg, Lewistown, State College, Tyrone, Altoona, Ebensburg, Johnstown, Latrobe, Greensburg, and Pittsburgh Service Provided: Scheduled Route Service Charter Group and Party Average Fare: $24.34 Total Number of Vehicles: 12 coaches INTERCITY BUS OPERATING FUNDS ( s) OPERATING FUNDS ( s) $3,696 Local $679 Revenue $1,59 State $579 Federal $ Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

274 Greyhound Lines, Inc. Operating Expense Per Passenger $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Total Passengers ( s) Operating Revenue Per Vehicle Mile 2 $6. 15 $5. $4. 1 $3. 5 $2. $1. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Total Bus Trips ( s) Operating Expense Per Vehicle Mile $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1. INTERCITY BUS FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Revenue Vehicle Miles ( s) Total Subsidy Per Vehicle Mile 1,2 $2.5 1, $ $1.5 $1. 2 $.5 FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 $. FY1-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Performance Report Fiscal Year

RD INSTRUCTION 1980-D, EXHIBIT C PAGE 240 GUARANTEED HOUSING PROGRAM INCOME LIMITS

RD INSTRUCTION 1980-D, EXHIBIT C PAGE 240 GUARANTEED HOUSING PROGRAM INCOME LIMITS RD INSTRUCTION 1980-D, EXHIBIT C PAGE 240 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ MSA Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA HUD Metro FMR Area VERY LOW INCOME 25700 29350 33000 36650 39600 42550 45450 48400 LOW INCOME

More information

Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance Report. Fiscal Year

Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance Report. Fiscal Year Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance Report Fiscal Year 27-8 April 29 Year In Review Overview and Looking Forward Introduction Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance

More information

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17 Total s San Diego Metropolitan Transit System POLICY 42 PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT Page 1 of 6 Date: 11/8/17 OBJECTIVE Develop a Customer-Focused and Competitive System The following measures of productivity

More information

Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance Report. Fiscal Year

Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance Report. Fiscal Year Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance Report Fiscal Year 28-9 April 21 This report is published annually to present a state of the industry report to Pennsylvania s citizens and elected

More information

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers Total San Diego Metropolitan Transit System POLICY 42 PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT Page 1 of 6 OBJECTIVE Develop a Customer-Focused and Competitive System The following measures of productivity and service

More information

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Monthly Performance Report AUGUST 2010 Ridership Report August 23, 2010 Budget to Actual Ridership Budget Target: 2,290,590 Actual: 2,300,796 Ridership Comparison

More information

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017 Note: New FY2018 Goal/Target/Min or Max incorporated in the Fixed Route and Connection Dashboards. Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND In June

More information

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW The following pages are excerpts from a DRAFT-version Fare Analysis report conducted by Nelson\Nygaard

More information

AGENDA GUEMES ISLAND FERRY OPERATIONS PUBLIC FORUM

AGENDA GUEMES ISLAND FERRY OPERATIONS PUBLIC FORUM AGENDA GUEMES ISLAND FERRY OPERATIONS PUBLIC FORUM Wednesday, August 17, 211 6: p.m. Guemes Island Community Hall ~ 7549 Guemes Island Road Thank you for attending the second Annual Public Forum in 211.

More information

Pennsylvania Emergency Preparedness Guide:

Pennsylvania Emergency Preparedness Guide: EMERGENCY CONTACT SHEET FOR RESOURCES IN PENNSYLVANIA Disaster Center Pennsylvania: Disaster Message Board, Family Disaster Plan, Weather Warnings, Animals in Disaster Lost and Found, Health and Welfare

More information

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016 Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016 Key Definitions 1. Tourism/Tourist: Refers to the leisure travel/traveler segment. 2. Travel/Traveler: Includes both leisure and business travel/travelers.

More information

Counties Designated Nonattainment or Maintenance for Clean Air Act s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

Counties Designated Nonattainment or Maintenance for Clean Air Act s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Application ID#: NCR39566 PAMS Pin#: 1342_19_3 Address: 10 East Ocean Avenue, Sea Bright Counties Designated Nonattainment or Maintenance for Clean Air Act s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

More information

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015 MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 215 Table of Contents SEPTEMBER 215 Section Page September Highlights... 3 Strategic Goals Progress Update... 4 Ridership... 6 Revenue... 9 Expenses... 1 System Summary...

More information

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES In the late 1990's when stabilization of bus service was accomplished between WMATA and the local jurisdictional bus systems, the need for service planning processes and procedures

More information

PHA Contact Information

PHA Contact Information HUD > Program Offices > Public and Indian Housing > Public Housing Agency (PHA) Plans > PHA Contact Information > Contact Information PHA Contact Information Pennsylvania This listing is ordered by city.

More information

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007) Transit Performance Report FY 2006-2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) J ANUARY 2008 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2006 2007 (JUNE 30, 2007) Transit Performance Report I SSUED: JANUARY 2008 The Transit Performance Report

More information

YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Short Range Transit Plan Prepared for the Merced County Association of Governments/YARTS Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL

More information

Board of Directors Information Summary

Board of Directors Information Summary Regional Public Transportation Authority 302 N. First Avenue, Suite 700, Phoenix, Arizona 85003 602-262-7433, Fax 602-495-0411 Board of Directors Information Summary Agenda Item #6 Date July 11, 2008 Subject

More information

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN: RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN: 2013-2017 Recommended Transit Service Improvement Plan NEWSLETTER 3 SEPTEMBER 2013 This newsletter describes the final recommended public transit plan for the City of

More information

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission FY 18-19 Transit Needs Assessment Ventura County Transportation Commission Contents List of Figures and Appendices.. 2 Appendices... 1 Chapter 1: Introduction What is the Ventura County Transportation

More information

2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report. Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised

2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report. Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised 2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised Contents Ridership & Revenue... 1 Historical Revenue & Ridership...

More information

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT/ VIVA SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT/ VIVA SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Report No. 6 of the Transportation Services Committee Regional Council Meeting of June 23, 2011 1 YORK REGION TRANSIT/ VIVA SYSTEM PERFORMANCE The Transportation Services Committee recommends: 1. Receipt

More information

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015 MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 215 Table of Contents DECEMBER 215 Section Page December Highlights... 3 Strategic Goals Progress Update... 4 Ridership... 6 Revenue... 9 Expenses... 1 System Summary...

More information

ATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter

ATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter TTCHMENT.7 Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year 2012-13 Fourth Quarter Introduction The Orange County Transportation uthority (OCT) operates a countywide network of local, community,

More information

RTD s Performance Management System

RTD s Performance Management System RTD s Performance Management System FTA s New Transit Asset Management (TAM) Program Why Set Targets? October 10, 2017 Donna DeMartino Chief Executive Officer (CEO) San Joaquin Regional Transit District

More information

REVIEW OF THE STATE EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT POOL

REVIEW OF THE STATE EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT POOL STATE OF FLORIDA Report No. 95-05 James L. Carpenter Interim Director Office of Program Policy Analysis And Government Accountability September 14, 1995 REVIEW OF THE STATE EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT POOL PURPOSE

More information

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report 2017/2018 - Q1 Performance Measures Report Contents Ridership & Revenue... 1 Historical Revenue & Ridership... 1 Revenue Actual vs. Planned... 3 Mean Distance Between Failures... 5 Maintenance Cost Quarter

More information

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR A Arlington Transit ART 1) Introduction The purpose of ART is to provide

More information

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

Chapter 3. Burke & Company Chapter 3 Burke & Company 3. WRTA RIDERSHIP AND RIDERSHIP TRENDS 3.1 Service Overview The Worcester Regional Transit Authority (WRTA) provides transit service to over half a million people. The service

More information

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2018 Performance Management Office INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Performance Management Office FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD FY 2019 Safety Max Target Goal Preventable Collisions per 100k

More information

Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report. 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report

Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report. 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report Contents Annual Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)... 1 Weekday Cost per Passenger... 1

More information

PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager

PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager PERFORMANCE REPORT JANUARY 2018 Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JANUARY 2018 Safety Max Target Goal Preventable

More information

Weight-Based Vehicle Class Information. Gateway to Warrendale. Overview. Turnpike Extensions. Mainline. Delaware River Bridge to Neshaminy Falls

Weight-Based Vehicle Class Information. Gateway to Warrendale. Overview. Turnpike Extensions. Mainline. Delaware River Bridge to Neshaminy Falls A Listing of E-ZPass Rates for All Classes of Vehicles Overview Pennsylvania Turnpike Information...Page 2 Exit Validated Fare Receipt/Turnpike Roadway Information Program...Page 3 Pennsylvania Turnpike

More information

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan 2017 Service Implementation Plan October 2016 SECTION NAME 2017 Service Implementation Plan October 2016 2017 SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... I List of Tables... III

More information

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual PERFORMANCE REPORT-THIRD QUARTER VISION TO DELIVER REGIONAL MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS THAT SIGNIFICANTLY AND CONTINUALLY INCREASE TRANSIT MARKET SHARE. MISSION

More information

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017 PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017 Note: New FY2018 Goal/Target/Min or Max incorporated in the Fixed Route and Connection Dashboards. Keith A. Clinkscale Performance Manager INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Keith

More information

A Listing of Cash Rates for All Classes of Vehicles Effective January 8, toll schedule 2017 PENNA TURN PIKE. Cash Rates. Safety starts with you.

A Listing of Cash Rates for All Classes of Vehicles Effective January 8, toll schedule 2017 PENNA TURN PIKE. Cash Rates. Safety starts with you. A Listing of Cash Rates for All Classes of Vehicles PENNA toll schedule 2017 Cash Rates Safety starts with you. Overview Pennsylvania Turnpike Information...Page 2 Validated Fare Receipt/Turnpike Roadway

More information

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. Housing and Health Committee. 25 May Perth and Kinross Local Housing Strategy

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. Housing and Health Committee. 25 May Perth and Kinross Local Housing Strategy PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL 7 16/234 Housing and Health Committee 25 May 2016 Perth and Kinross Local Housing Strategy 2016-2021 Report by Director (Housing and Social Work) PURPOSE OF REPORT This report

More information

Executive Summary. Introduction. Community Assessment

Executive Summary. Introduction. Community Assessment Executive Summary Introduction The Red Rose Transit Authority (RRTA) Transit Development Plan provides an evaluation of existing RRTA fixed route services, with the outcome being practical recommendations

More information

toll schedule 2017 Safety starts with you. SECTION 1: E-ZPass Rates SECTION 2: Cash Rates SECTION 3: PA Turnpike TOLL BY PLATE Locations / Rates

toll schedule 2017 Safety starts with you. SECTION 1: E-ZPass Rates SECTION 2: Cash Rates SECTION 3: PA Turnpike TOLL BY PLATE Locations / Rates A Listing of E-ZPass, Cash and PA Turnpike TOLL BY PLATE Rates for All Classes of Vehicles PENNA toll schedule 2017 SECTION 1: E-ZPass Rates SECTION 2: Cash Rates SECTION 3: PA Turnpike TOLL BY PLATE Locations

More information

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012 1. Introduction The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends that airport master plans be updated every 5 years or as necessary to keep them current. The Master Plan for Joslin Field, Magic Valley

More information

General Issues Committee Item Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy

General Issues Committee Item Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy General Issues Committee Item 4.1 2017 Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy January 27, 2017 Presentation Outline 2017 Operating Budget Overview Ten Year Local Transit Strategy 2 2017

More information

YRT/VIVA PROPOSED FARE INCREASE

YRT/VIVA PROPOSED FARE INCREASE Report No. 7 of the Transportation Services Committee Regional Council Meeting of September 22, 1 2012 YRT/VIVA PROPOSED FARE INCREASE The Transportation Services Committee recommends: 1. Receipt of the

More information

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014. RESOLUTION NO. R2013-24 Establish a Fare Structure and Fare Level for Tacoma Link MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: PHONE: Board 09/26/2013 Final Action Ric Ilgenfritz, Executive Director,

More information

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time. PREFACE The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has embarked upon a statewide evaluation of transit system performance. The outcome of this evaluation is a benchmark of transit performance that

More information

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE Outline 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards 3. Current Practice in SRTP & Critique 1 Public Transport Planning A. Long Range (>

More information

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018 SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018 2018 Contents Introduction... 1 A. Key Terms Used in this Report... 1 Key Findings... 2 A. Ridership... 2 B. Fare Payment... 4 Performance Analysis

More information

Transit System Performance Update

Transit System Performance Update Clause 5 in Report No. 4 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on March 29, 2018. 5 2017 Transit System Performance

More information

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN Agenda Overview Part I: Key Findings Market Assessment Service Evaluation Part II: Service Development Framework Metrics Criteria Part III: Next Steps SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN Preliminary Analysis and Criteria

More information

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW 2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW The Joint Transit Committee and Rapid Transit Public/Private Partnership Steering Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation

More information

University of Connecticut Division of Student Affairs Unit Review. What is Unit Review? Purpose. Guiding Principles of Unit Review

University of Connecticut Division of Student Affairs Unit Review. What is Unit Review? Purpose. Guiding Principles of Unit Review University of Connecticut Division of Student Affairs Unit Review What is Unit Review? Unit review is a collaborative process designed to provide an in-depth, comprehensive study of a unit/department.

More information

(This page intentionally left blank.)

(This page intentionally left blank.) Executive Summary (This page intentionally left blank.) Executive Summary INTRODUCTION The Cache Valley Transit District (CVTD) contracted with the team of Transportation Consultants, Inc. () and Fehr

More information

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum APPENDIX B Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum Arlington County Appendix B December 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW OF PEER ANALYSIS PROCESS... 2 1.1 National Transit Database...2 1.2

More information

(Also known as the Den-Ice Agreements Program) Evaluation & Advisory Services. Transport Canada

(Also known as the Den-Ice Agreements Program) Evaluation & Advisory Services. Transport Canada Evaluation of Transport Canada s Program of Payments to Other Government or International Agencies for the Operation and Maintenance of Airports, Air Navigation, and Airways Facilities (Also known as the

More information

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG cover Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG BOARD POLICY NO. 029 REGIONAL FARE POLICY AND COMPREHENSIVE FARE ORDINANCE Purpose: To establish guidelines for setting a uniform, fair, and equitable areawide

More information

FY Year End Performance Report

FY Year End Performance Report Overall Ridership Big Blue Bus carried 18,748,869 passengers in FY2014-2015, a 0.3% reduction from the year prior. This negligible reduction in ridership represents the beginnings of a reversal from a

More information

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold ATTACHMENT A About This Report The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) operates a countywide network of local, community, rail connector, and express bus routes serving over 6, bus stops. OCTA

More information

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES Adopted March 13, 2013 Federal Title VI requirements of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were recently updated by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and now require

More information

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES INTRODUCTION An Airport Master Plan provides an evalua on of the airport s avia on demand and an overview of the systema c airport development that will best meet those demands. The Master Plan establishes

More information

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan Record of Public Comments and Recommended Transit Service Plan June 5, 2018 Kevin Muhs Deputy Director #242846 Status of the Transit Development Plan Existing Conditions

More information

1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW

1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW 1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW Forty-nine transit agencies in Ohio operate demand response service, not including demand response services operated as part of the transit service provided in conjunction with

More information

COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN

COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN COLT RECOMMENDED BUSINESS PLAN 2008 INTRODUCTION The past decade has been one of change in Lebanon County and this situation is expected to continue in the future. This has included growth in population,

More information

The Pioneer Corridor OBJECTIVES: CORRIDOR 16

The Pioneer Corridor OBJECTIVES: CORRIDOR 16 CORRIDOR 16 The Pioneer Corridor This east-west corridor connects Harrisburg to western Pennsylvania. This corridor pioneered transportation in North America and is responsible for some of the world s

More information

Bus Operations Report

Bus Operations Report Third Quarter FY 216 (January 1 - March 31, 216) Wednesday April 27, 216 Operations Ridership: 783,194 passengers used in the third quarter. This represents a 2% increase over the same period in FY 215.

More information

SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT

SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2014 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 198 Van Buren Street, Suite 300 Herndon, Virginia 20170 JANUARY 2015 Introduction The

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014 DATE: January 23, 2014 SUBJECT: Request to authorize advertisement of a public hearing to consider an ordinance amending

More information

Bristol Virginia Transit

Bristol Virginia Transit Bristol Virginia Transit 1 Transit Overview Bristol Virginia Transit (BVT) is a Federally Funded and certified urban area transit system. BVT began operation in its current form in 1982. In Fiscal Year

More information

Creating Sustainable Communities Through Public Transportation

Creating Sustainable Communities Through Public Transportation Creating Sustainable Communities Through Public Transportation 21 st Transportation Committee January 16, 2008 Keith T. Parker Chief Executive Officer Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) Charlotte Mecklenburg

More information

Glossary and Acronym List

Glossary and Acronym List AFS Safety Assurance System (SAS) Overview Glossary and Acronym List This document lists and defines many SAS acronyms and terms. This is not intended to be a complete list of terms and definitions. TERM

More information

FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018

FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018 FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018 Safety Max Target Goal Preventable Collisions per 100k Miles Non-Preventable Collisions per 100k Miles Total Incidents per 10,000 Boardings 1.6 1.3 0.8 2.63 2.1 2.0 1.60

More information

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS December 2014 STATUS: TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY Goal: Identify and evaluate different options for a revised fare structure, including pricing strategies

More information

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014 Route Optimization I N I T I A T I V E New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014 1 Welcome Blueprint for Transportation Excellence (BTE) 20 year strategic plan Blueprint 2020 JTA s five-year plan for

More information

Silver Line Operating Plan

Silver Line Operating Plan Customer Service and Operations Committee Information Item IV-A December 6, 2012 Silver Line Operating Plan Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information

More information

2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry

2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry 2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, DePaul University June 25, 2015 This Intercity Bus Briefing summarizes the Chaddick Institute

More information

Transport Indicators Report June 2018

Transport Indicators Report June 2018 Transport Indicators Report June 2018 Board Meeting 21 August 2018 Recommendation That the Board: i. Receives this report. Executive summary 1. The attached Monthly and Quarterly Indicator Reports provide

More information

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

Why we re here: For educational purposes only Transportation 2050 Why we re here: For educational purposes only Transportation 2050 Bus Elements PUBLIC TRANSIT DEPARTMENT City of Phoenix Citizens Committee on the Future of Phoenix Transportation (CCFPT)

More information

Other Principle Arterials Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local

Other Principle Arterials Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local CHAPTER 10 TRANSPORTATION Introduction The system of public roads in East Pikeland Township is decidedly rural in character. Since the 1984, the road network has remained much the same, with the addition

More information

Governor Corbett Announces State Investment in 24 Rail Projects

Governor Corbett Announces State Investment in 24 Rail Projects News for Immediate Release Nov. 9, 2012 Governor Corbett Announces State Investment in 24 Rail Projects Harrisburg Twenty-four freight-rail projects across Pennsylvania will improve businesses rail access,

More information

Greater Portland Transit District

Greater Portland Transit District Greater Portland Transit District TO: FROM: Freeport Town Council Greg Jordan - Metro General Manager DATE: September 10, 2014 SUBJECT: Metro Request to Pursue Grant Funding for Trial Express Bus Service

More information

Table of Contents. TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE i

Table of Contents. TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE i Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction... 1 Chapter 2. Financial Review... 3 2.1 Operating Costs... 3 2.2 Capital Costs... 3 2.3 Revenues... 4 2.4 Overall Funding Implications... 4 Chapter 3. Service

More information

CONFERENCE ON THE ECONOMICS OF AIRPORTS AND AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES

CONFERENCE ON THE ECONOMICS OF AIRPORTS AND AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES ANSConf-WP/23 4/2/00 ITEM 6 CONFERENCE ON THE ECONOMICS OF AIRPORTS AND AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES (Montreal, 19-28 June 2000) Agenda Item 6: Guidance and assistance by ICAO ICAO ACTIVITIES IN THE FIELD OF

More information

RE: Perry County Shared Ride Program and Medical Assistance Transportation Program (MATP)

RE: Perry County Shared Ride Program and Medical Assistance Transportation Program (MATP) October 30, 2016 RE: Perry County Shared Ride Program and Medical Assistance Transportation Program (MATP) Dear Shared Ride/MATP Rider: The Perry County Commissioners have appointed rabbittransit as the

More information

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development 2017 Regional Peer Review Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 SNAPSHOT... 5 PEER SELECTION... 6 NOTES/METHODOLOGY...

More information

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit Regional Fare Change Overview Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit Committee of the Whole April 5 th, 2017 Today s Presentation Fare change goals and considerations Public engagement

More information

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience FOR ANYBODY GOING ANYWHER IN LA HABRA International Conference on Demand Responsive Transportation Breckenridge, Colorado September 2016 DRT Performance

More information

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California LA Metro Transportation planner/coordinator, designer, builder

More information

Presentation Outline

Presentation Outline Presentation Outline Overview of Planning Process Initial Service and Fare Considerations RTC RIDE Fixed-route RTC ACCESS Paratransit Fares Next Steps Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

More information

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS October 2018 2017 REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS The Council s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Alene Tchourumoff

More information

SKAGIT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ferry Operations Division Ferry Fare Revenue Target Report

SKAGIT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ferry Operations Division Ferry Fare Revenue Target Report SKAGIT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ferry Operations Division 2018 Ferry Fare Revenue Target Report Skagit County Public Works Department 2018 Ferry Fare Revenue Target Report The following report is

More information

VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report

VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report Overview Quarter 2 Fiscal Year 2018-2019 This report provides performance measures for VCTC Intercity Bus Service covering the FY 2018-19

More information

The Strategic Commercial and Procurement Manager

The Strategic Commercial and Procurement Manager Item 3 To: Procurement Sub Committee On: 8 June 2016 Report by: The Strategic Commercial and Procurement Manager Heading: Renfrewshire Council s Community Benefit Strategy 2016 1. Summary 1.1. The purpose

More information

Gunnison Valley Air Service Strategic Plan. Strategic Priority #1: Creating a Collaborative Public-Private Partnership

Gunnison Valley Air Service Strategic Plan. Strategic Priority #1: Creating a Collaborative Public-Private Partnership Gunnison Valley Air Service Strategic Plan Strategic Priorities 1. Collaborative Public-Private Partnership 2. Ensuring Stable and Sustainable Funding 3. Air Service Results for the Valley 4. Valley Marketing

More information

ICAO Young Aviation Professionals Programme

ICAO Young Aviation Professionals Programme ICAO Young Aviation Professionals Programme In partnership with and The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), in partnership with the International Air Transport Association (IATA) and Airports

More information

Update on the Thameslink programme

Update on the Thameslink programme A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Department for Transport Update on the Thameslink programme HC 413 SESSION 2017 2019 23 NOVEMBER 2017 4 Key facts

More information

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT 8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT The Transportation Services Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained in the following report dated May 27, 2010, from the Commissioner

More information

EXHIBIT K TERMINAL PROJECT PROCEDURES PHASE I - DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL PROGRAM & ALTERNATIVES

EXHIBIT K TERMINAL PROJECT PROCEDURES PHASE I - DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL PROGRAM & ALTERNATIVES EXHIBIT K TERMINAL PROJECT PROCEDURES PHASE I - DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL PROGRAM & ALTERNATIVES Over the term of the Master Amendment to the Airline Use and Lease Agreement, the Kansas City Aviation Department

More information

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Central Corridor light-rail transit (LRT) project will open in 2014 and operate between downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul, serving the University of Minnesota and University

More information

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CUSTOMIZED COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION CCT CONNECT SERVICE TARIFF NO. 229 SUPPLEMENT NO. 10 LOCAL RATES OF FARE AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE FURNISHING

More information

Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary's Office

Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary's Office December 13, 2013 Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary's Office Martin O'Malley Govemor Anthony G. Brown Lt. Govemor James T. Smith, Jr. Secretary The Honorable Edward J. Kasemeyer Chair,

More information

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management 2013 Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES RTA staff has undertaken the development of a performance

More information