ANNEX C. Maximum Aircraft Movement Data and the Calculation of Risk and PSZs: Cork Airport
|
|
- Rodger O’Connor’
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ANNEX C Maximum Aircraft Movement Data and the Calculation of Risk and PSZs: Cork Airport
2 CONTENTS C1 INTRODUCTION C1 C2 SUMMARY OF INPUT DATA C2 C3 AIRCRAFT CRASH RATE C5 C3.1 AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION C5 C3.2 ALL CLASSES MOVEMENT WEIGHTED AVERAGE CRASH RATE C5 C3.2.1 Crash Rate (Crashes per Year) C5 C3.2.2 Average Crash Rate (Crashes per Movement) C5 C3.2.3 Weighted Average Destroyed Area C6 C3.2.4 Type of Crash C7 C3.3 ANNUAL CRASH RATE FOR EACH CRASH MODE C8 C3.4 LONGITUDINAL AND LATERAL DISTANCE CALCULATION C10 C4 IMPACT PROBABILITY CALCULATION C12 C4.1.1 Take-off Overrun - Wreckage Location C12 C4.1.2 Landing Overruns - Wreckage Location C12 C4.1.3 Take-off Crash (non overrun) C12 C4.1.4 Landing Crash (non overrun) C12 C4.1.5 Light C12 C5 INDIVIDUAL RISK CALCULATION C14 C6 CALCULATION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY ZONE TRIANGLES C15
3 C1 INTRODUCTION The calculation method is based on a model produced for the UK Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1) and subsequently reported by the National Air Traffic Services (NATS) (2). The calculation method is described in Annex A. The following sections provide details of sample calculations for runways at Cork Airport. The principal input to the model is summarised in Section C2. (1) Evans, A. W., Foot, P. B. et al. Third Party Risk Near Airports and Public Safety Zone Policy. June National Air Traffic Services Limited. R&D Report RDD File Reference 8CS/091/03/10. (2) Cowell, P. G., Foot, P. B. et al. A Methodology for Calculating Individual Risk Due to Aircraft Accidents Near Airports. January National Air Traffic Services Limited. R&D Report R&DG File Reference 8RD/07/002/11. C1
4 C2 SUMMARY OF INPUT DATA The numbers of annual for Cork airport have been provided, according to aircraft type, for the 2000 (1), as summarised in Table C2.1 and Table C2.2. Table C2.1 Crash Frequency Summary, Year 2000 Movements: Cork Airport Boeing Class Number of per Crash rate (crashes per million ) Crash rate (crashes per ) Average MTWA (tonne) Destroyed area (hectare) NATS MODEL Class I jets Class II-IV jets (PAX) 13, E Class II-IV jets (NP) 1, E Eastern jets E Executive jets 1, E Turboprops T1 (PAX) 6, E Turboprops T1 (NP) E Turboprops T E Miscellaneous E TOTAL 24, E-2 AVERAGE AEA LIGHT AIRCRAFT MODEL Piston engine 22, E GRAND TOTAL 47, E-2 Notes 1. Total per for the MTWA - maximum take-off weight authorised. 3. PAX - passenger aircraft. 4. NP - non passenger aircraft (e.g. freight). Table C2.2 Summary of Movements, Year 2000: Cork Airport 7 25 Total Total Grand total NATS model Landings ,505 5,492 11,997 12,436 4% 51% 55% 27% 23% 50% Take offs ,590 4,447 12,037 12,393 7% 38% 45% 32% 19% 50% 24,829 AEA light aircraft model Landings + Take offs 1,112 5,027 6,139 7,773 9,034 16,807 22,946 18% 82% 100% 46% 54% 100% Grand total 1,196 5,738 6,934 21,868 18,973 40,841 47,775 (1) Alan Levey (Aer Rianta) to Daniel Quinn (ERM). 28-May C2
5 It is understood that the maximum perceived number of accommodated on runways 17/35 and 7/25 are estimated as 109,500 (based on 300 per day, 365 days per ) and 43,800 (based on 40% of 109,500) per. It is judged that the proportions of aircraft classes using the Airport will be similar to those corresponding to the for Therefore, the average crash rate per movement and average destroyed area remain unchanged and are the same as those detailed in Table C2.1. Table C2.3 Crash Frequency Summary, Maximum Movements: Cork Airport Boeing Class Number of per Crash rate (crashes per million ) Crash rate (crashes per ) Average MTWA (tonne) Destroyed area (hectare) NATS MODEL Class I jets Class II-IV jets (PAX) 56, E Class II-IV jets (NP) 5, E Eastern jets E Executive jets 5, E Turboprops T1 (PAX) 28, E Turboprops T1 (NP) E Turboprops T2 2, E Miscellaneous 3, E TOTAL 102, E-2 AVERAGE AEA LIGHT AIRCRAFT MODEL Piston engine 50, E GRAND TOTAL 153, E-1 Notes 1. Total maximum capacity per. 2. MTWA - maximum take-off weight authorised. 3. PAX - passenger aircraft. 4. NP - non passenger aircraft (e.g. freight). 5. The calculated average crash rate per movement and average destroyed areas are the same as those for 2000 (see Table C2.1). It is judged that the proportions of landings and take-offs in each direction for the future case are equal to those for the The number of landings and take-offs for the maximum capacity, main runway case are summarised in Table C2.4. C3
6 Table C2.4 Summary of Movements, Maximum Movements: Cork Airport 7 25 Total Total Grand total NATS model Landings 171 2,248 2,419 26,673 22,520 49,193 51,612 4% 51% 55% 27% 23% 50% Take offs 292 1,669 1,961 31,122 18,235 49,357 51,318 7% 38% 45% 32% 19% 50% 102,930 AEA light aircraft model Landings + Take offs 7,140 32,280 39,420 5,064 5,886 10,950 50,370 18% 82% 100% 46% 54% 100% Grand total 7,603 36,197 43,800 62,860 46, , ,300 It is recognised that, for practical reasons, all runways at an airport are unlikely to each be operating at its own maximum. Therefore, the total maximum number of for an airport is unlikely to be the sum of the maxima for the individual runways. Similarly, the sum of the maximum take-offs for an airport need not necessarily be the same as the sum of the maximum landings for an airport. Additional information relating to the size of the runways is also required, as summarised in Table C2.5. Table C2.5 Summary of Runway Specific Detail: Cork Airport Runway Length (m) Offset - End 1 (m) Offset - End 2 (m) 7/25 1, /35 2, Notes 1. The Length detailed here is the length of the tarmac, not accounting for the presence of displaced thresholds. 2. The offset distances are the distances from the end of tarmac to the displaced threshold. Displaced thresholds are not in operation for landings on runways at Cork Airport. See Annex A for more information on displaced thresholds. The number of aircraft for the 2000 and maximum capacity cases are implemented in the method outlined in Section C5 to yield the impact frequency for any point. The results are summarised in Table C6.1. C4
7 C3 AIRCRAFT CRASH RATE C3.1 AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION Examples of the Boeing aircraft classes are summarised in the DETR report and are detailed in Annex A. The aircraft data for Cork Airport, grouped according to the Boeing Classes are summarised in Table C2.3. C3.2 ALL CLASSES MOVEMENT WEIGHTED AVERAGE CRASH RATE Crash frequency results are summarised in Table C2.3 and explained below. Light and large aircraft are considered separately. Note that the example calculations in the following sections have been performed with numbers expressed to more significant figures or decimal places than are shown. Therefore, results from calculations reproduced using rounded numbers may differ slightly from those shown in the following sections. C3.2.1 Crash Rate (Crashes per Year) Each aircraft group has an associated crash rate (crashes per movement) as detailed in the NATS report (1). The crash rate (crashes per ) for each group is calculated from the total per and the crash rate (crashes per movement). For example, using the maximum movement figures for Class II-IV western airliner jets (PAX): Number of per Crash rate (crashes per movement) = Crash rate (crashes per ) 56, E-6 = 8.31 E-3 C3.2.2 Average Crash Rate (Crashes per Movement) An average crash rate (crashes per movement) for large aircraft is calculated accounting for the number of of each aircraft class. The total crash rate (crashes per ) is divided by the total number of annual as, summarised below: Total crash rate Total number of = Average crash rate (per (crashes per ) movement) 4.53 E-2 102,930 = E-6 Therefore, the average crash rate is per million. (1) Evans, A. W., Foot, P. B. et al. Third Party Risk Near Airports and Public Safety Zone Policy. June National Air Traffic Services Limited. R&D Report RDD File Reference 8CS/091/03/10. C5
8 C3.2.3 Weighted Average Destroyed Area Equation C3.1 The average maximum take-off weight authorised (MTWA) is the calculated mean average for each aircraft class. The weighted average MTWA is weighted according to the number of crashes per for each aircraft class. For example, using the figures for Class II-IV western airliner jets (PAX): Crash rate (crashes per ) Average MTWA (tonne) = Weighted average MTWA (tonne.crashes per ) 8.31 E = The destroyed area is calculated from the following relationship detailed in the NATS report and Annex A: A ln ln W ln, BC i where A BC,i W area destroyed (m²) MTWA (kg) For example, using the MTWA for Class II-IV western airliner jets (PAX) (101 tonne or 101,000 kg): ln(a) = ln(101,000) = ln(a) = = A = e A = 4,975 An average destroyed area is calculated accounting for the crash rate of each aircraft class. The destroyed area for each class is multiplied by its proportion of the total crash rate (crashes per ). This is equivalent to summing the product of the crash rate (crashes per ) and destroyed area for each of the large aircraft classes, as summarised below: Crash rate (crashes per ) Destroyed area (hectare) = Weighted destroyed area (hectare.crashes per ) Class I jets 0 N/A = 0 Class II-IV jets (PAX) 8.31 E = 4.14 E-3 Class II-IV jets (NP) 2.65 E = 1.23 E-3 Eastern jets 2.92 E = 9.59 E-6 Executive jets 1.29 E = 2.59 E-3 Turboprops T1 (PAX) 8.33 E = 1.68 E-3 Turboprops T1 (NP) 5.60 E = 1.13 E-4 C6
9 Turboprops T E = 4.59 E-4 Miscellaneous 1.10 E = 1.18 E-3 Total 1.14 E-2 Total weighted destroyed Total crashes = Average destroyed area per area (hectares) 1.14 E E-2 = Assuming the destroyed area is square, the average destroyed area ( hectares or 2,514 m²) is represented by a square whose side is 50.1 m. Similarly, the destroyed area for light aircraft is calculated as hectares (775 m²), which approximates to a square of side 27.8 m. C3.2.4 Type of Crash In both the NATS and the DETR reports, the proportions of the four types of crash were estimated as follows: take-off crashes from flight, 20% take-off overruns, 8% landing crashes from flight, 52% and landing overruns, 20%. The average crash rate is apportioned to the four types of crash as summarised in Table C3.1. For example, for take-off crashes from flight: Average crash rate (crashes per million ) Proportion of take-off crashes from flight = Average crash rate for take-off crashes from flight (crashes per million ) = The model for light aircraft does not distinguish between take-off and landing crashes, therefore a combined (i.e. take-off and landing) crash rate is used. Table C3.1 Summary of Crash Rates (All Aircraft Classes): Cork Crash rate per million Crashes Overruns Total NATS model Landings Take-offs AEA light aircraft model Total N/A N/A 3.27 Notes 1. N/A - not applicable. The light aircraft model does not distinguish between crashes and overruns. C7
10 C3.3 ANNUAL CRASH RATE FOR EACH CRASH MODE The annual crash rate is related to the number of on a given runway. The numbers of annual maximum for each runway are summarised in Table C2.4. As an example, the number of maximum, associated with the main runway (17/35) are shown schematically in Figure C3.1. Figure C3.1 Schematic of Maximum Large Aircraft Movements Associated with the Main Runway (17/35) End 17 Take-offs 18,235 19% Landings 26,673 27% Landings 22,520 23% Take-offs 31,122 32% End 35 C8
11 Figure C3.2 Schematic of Maximum Light Aircraft Movements Associated with the Existing Main Runway (17/35) End 17 Landings+Take-offs 5,886 54% Landings+Take-offs 5,064 46% End 35 For a point at End 35, the following crash rates are calculated (1) (2) : Take-off overrun (A) Take-off overrun crash rate (crashes per movement) Number of = Crash rate per ( ,000,000) 31,122 = 1.10 E-3 Landing overrun (A) Landing overrun crash rate (crashes per movement) Number of = Crash rate per ( ,000,000) 26,673 = 2.35 E-3 Take-off crash (non overrun) (A) Take-off non overrun crash rate (crashes per movement) Number of = Crash rate per ( ,000,000) 31,122 = 2.74 E-3 (1) Crash rates associated with where the calculation point is after and before the runway (relative to the movement) are indicated by the letter A and B, respectively. (2) For individual risk calculation other than alongside the runway, take-off and landing overruns are only considered when the direction of landing or take-off is towards the calculation point. Therefore, only crash rates indicated by A are detailed. C9
12 Take-off crash (non overrun) (B) Take-off non overrun crash rate (crashes per movement) Number of = Crash rate per ( ,000,000) 18,235 = 1.61 E-3 Landing crash (non overrun) (A) Landing non overrun crash rate (crashes per movement) Number of = Crash rate per ( ,000,000) 26,673 = 6.11 E-3 Landing crash (non overrun) (B) Landing non overrun crash rate (crashes per movement) Number of = Crash rate per ( ,000,000) 22,520 = 5.16 E-3 Light aircraft (Runway 17) Take-off overrun crash rate (crashes per movement) Number of = Crash rate per (3.27 1,000,000) 5,064 = 1.66 E-2 Light aircraft (Runway 35) Take-off overrun crash rate (crashes per movement) Number of = Crash rate per (3.27 1,000,000) 5,886 = 1.92 E-2 C3.4 LONGITUDINAL AND LATERAL DISTANCE CALCULATION Consider calculation at a point at End 35 as illustrated in Figure C3.1. C10
13 Figure C3.1 Representative Runway Diagram Take-off Direction 17 Point of interest y = y -ve y = 0 y +ve x +ve x +ve 17 Runway of length 2133 metres y +ve y = 0 y -ve y = Take-off Direction 35 Landing Direction 17 Point of interest y -ve y = 0 y +ve y = 2133 x +ve x +ve 17 Runway of length 2133 metres 35 y = 2133 y +ve y = y -ve 50 Landing Direction 35 Notes 1. The schematic is not to scale. 2. It is understood that there is no displaced threshold on Runway 17/35 at Cork Airport. Therefore, the runway origin is taken as the end of the tarmac. For the point illustrated in Figure C3.1, at the south of Runway 17/35 (i.e. End 35), the values of x and y are defined for each crash mode as summarised in Table C3.2. The length of 17/35 Runway is given as 2,133 m. Therefore, the longitudinal distance of the sample point, for a landing overrun is: Runway length (m) + Distance from runway = Longitudinal threshold (m) distance (m) 2, = 2,258 Similarly, for a landing crash (non overrun) (B), the longitudinal distance of the sample point, for a landing overrun is: - Distance from runway threshold (m) = Longitudinal distance (m) -125 = -125 Table C3.2 Summary of Lateral and Longitudinal Coordinates Crash mode Lateral, x (m) Longitudinal, y (m) Take-off overrun Landing overrun 50 2,258 Take-off crash (non overrun) (A) Take-off crash (non overrun) (B) 50-2,258 Landing crash (non overrun) (A) 50 2,258 Landing crash (non overrun) (B) C11
14 C4 IMPACT PROBABILITY CALCULATION Impact probability can be calculated at any point from the integrals of the Probability Density Functions (PDFs) given in Annex A and aircraft crash rates calculated in Section C3. C4.1.1 Take-off Overrun - Wreckage Location Sample Calculation For the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1, the integral of the PDF is calculated as E-3, for y = 125 m and x = 50 m. C4.1.2 Landing Overruns - Wreckage Location Sample Calculation (A) For the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1, the integral of the PDF is calculated as E-3, for y = 2,258 m and x = 50 m. C4.1.3 Take-off Crash (non overrun) Sample Calculation (A) For the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1, the integral of the PDF is calculated as E-3, for y = 125 m and x = 50 m. Sample Calculation (B) For the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1, the integral of the PDF is calculated as E-4, for y = -2,258 m and x = 50 m. C4.1.4 Landing Crash (non overrun) Sample Calculation (A) For the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1, the integral of the PDF is calculated as E-5, for y = 2,258 m and x = 50 m. Sample Calculation (B) For the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1, the integral of the PDF is calculated as E-3, for y = -125 m and x = 50 m. C4.1.5 Light Sample Calculation (Runway 17) For the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1, the integral of the PDF is calculated as E-6, for y = 125 m and x = 50 m. C12
15 Sample Calculation (Runway 35) For the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1, the integral of the PDF is calculated as E-5, for y = 125 m and x = 50 m. C13
16 C5 INDIVIDUAL RISK CALCULATION The individual risk (IR) at any point can be calculated by summing the products of the crash frequency (detailed in Section C3) and impact probability (summarised in Section C4), for each crash mode. For the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1, at south end of runway 17/35 (End 35), the calculation is as follows: Crash rate per PDF Integral = Crash frequency per Take-off overrun (A) E E-3 = 1.60 E-5 Landing overrun (A) E E-3 = 1.22 E-5 Take-off crash (non overrun) (A) E E-3 = 1.19 E-5 Take-off crash (non overrun) (B) E E-4 = 6.81 E-7 Landing crash (non overrun) (A) E E-5 = 1.01 E-6 Landing crash (non overrun) (B) E E-3 = 1.80 E-5 Light aircraft (Runway 17) 1.66 E E-5 = 6.79 E-7 Light aircraft (Runway 35) 1.92 E E-6 = 2.45 E-8 Total 6.06 E-5 This value (6.06 E-5) represents the annual individual risk for the sample point illustrated in Figure C3.1. C14
17 C6 CALCULATION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY ZONE TRIANGLES The Public Safety Zones (PSZs) are calculated based on the maximum movement data. Light aircraft are not included in the calculation of the outer PSZ. The maximum width calculation method is described in Annex A. The distance (Y mw ) along the extended runway centreline from End 35 where the annual individual risk is calculated as 1 E-6 is 11,015 m. The distance (X mw ) perpendicular to the extended runway centreline at which the individual risk is calculated as 1 E-6 is 505 m. The distance (Y mw ) along the extended runway centreline where the maximum width occurs is 470 m. The triangle base width for the PSZ (corresponding to an annual individual risk of 1 E-6) is calculated as 1,055 m, as follows. Equation C6.1 X max The triangle base width is double X max. The Public Safety Zone results for each runway corresponding to the maximum are summarised in Table C6.1. Table C6.1 Summary of PSZ Dimensions: Cork PSZ triangles Airport and Runway Length (m) Width (m) Area (km²) CORK (maximum ) 7 (west end) 10-4 N/A N/A N/A Inner Outer 2, (east end) 10-4 N/A N/A N/A Inner Outer 2, (north end) Inner 3, Outer 11, (south end) Inner 3, Outer 11,015 1, Notes 1. Inner and outer PSZs relate to annual individual risks of 10-5 and 10-6 per respectively. 2. N/A not applicable. Individual risk of 10-4 per is not reached at the ends of Runway 7/25. C15
ANNEX F. Public Consultation: ERM s Response to Public Submissions
ANNEX F Public Consultation: ERM s Response to Public Submissions F1 INTRODUCTION In July 2003, public comments were invited on recommendations made for Public Safety Zones (PSZs) at Cork, Dublin and Shannon
More informationMaximum Levels of Airport Charges
Maximum Levels of Airport Charges Annual Compliance Statement for 24 September to 31 December 2003 and for the Regulatory Period 20 and Provisional Price Caps for the Regulatory Period 20 Commission Paper
More informationARCHERFIELD AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL PAPER TP 03/10 RUNWAY CAPACITY
ARCHERFIELD AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL PAPER TP 03/10 (Revision 2) RUNWAY CAPACITY An Investigation of Practical Capacity with Class D Airspace Procedures and the Proposed Runway Configuration JULY
More informationDraft Proposal for the Amendment of the Sub-Cap on Off-Peak Landing & Take Off Charges at Dublin Airport. Addendum to Commission Paper CP4/2003
Draft Proposal for the Amendment of the Sub-Cap on Off-Peak Landing & Take Off Charges at Dublin Airport Addendum to Commission Paper CP4/2003 26 th November 2003 Commission for Aviation Regulation 3 rd
More informationICAO CORSIA CO 2 Estimation and Reporting Tool (CERT) Design, Development and Validation
ICAO CORSIA CO 2 Estimation and Reporting Tool (CERT) Design, Development and Validation August 2018 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 3 2. High level architecture and evolution of the ICAO
More informationAssessment of local aircraft crash risk
Assessment of local aircraft crash risk Application of a cluster analysis as a statistical method for detecting similar airports Christoph Thiel Institute of Logistics and Aviation Technische Universität
More informationSmall Group Exercise 1: Emissions Monitoring Plan
Small Group Exercise 1: Emissions Monitoring Plan Introduction: According to the draft Annex 16, Volume IV, the aeroplane operator shall submit an Emissions Monitoring Plan (EMP) to the State to which
More informationEnvironmental Assessment. Runway 14 Smart Tracking Approach Gold Coast Airport
Environmental Assessment Runway 14 Smart Tracking Approach Gold Coast Airport Table of Contents Introduction ` 3 Runway 14 Smart Tracking approach 3 Assessment 3 Assumptions 3 Nominated aircraft 3 How
More information2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study
2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study November 4, 2009 Prepared by The District of Muskoka Planning and Economic Development Department BACKGROUND The Muskoka Airport is situated at the north end
More informationSafety Regulation Group CAP 776. Global Fatal Accident Review
Safety Regulation Group CAP 776 Global Fatal Accident Review 1997 2006 Civil Aviation Authority 2008 All rights reserved. Copies of this publication may be reproduced for personal use, or for use within
More informationHow many accidents is a collision? Hans de Jong Eurocontrol Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton,
How many accidents is a collision? Hans de Jong Eurocontrol Safety R&D Seminar, Southampton, 24.10.2008 Introduction Interesting about moving is to experience people have different views Even more interesting
More informationAnalysis of en-route vertical flight efficiency
Analysis of en-route vertical flight efficiency Technical report on the analysis of en-route vertical flight efficiency Edition Number: 00-04 Edition Date: 19/01/2017 Status: Submitted for consultation
More informationConsideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.
Advisory Circular AC 139-11 Revision 2 Use of day-vfr aerodromes 27 April 2007 General Civil Aviation Authority advisory circulars (AC) contain information about standards, practices and procedures that
More informationRegulating Air Transport: Department for Transport consultation on proposals to update the regulatory framework for aviation
Regulating Air Transport: Department for Transport consultation on proposals to update the regulatory framework for aviation Response from the Aviation Environment Federation 18.3.10 The Aviation Environment
More informationTHE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NEW CONNECTIONS TO CHINA
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NEW CONNECTIONS TO CHINA A note prepared for Heathrow March 2018 Three Chinese airlines are currently in discussions with Heathrow about adding new direct connections between Heathrow
More informationHEATHROW NIGHT MOVEMENT AND QUOTA ALLOCATION PROCEDURES Version 3
LOCAL RULE 1 HEATHROW NIGHT MOVEMENT AND QUOTA ALLOCATION PROCEDURES Version 3 1. POLICY All Night Flights require the prior allocation of a slot and corresponding Night Quota (movement and noise quota).
More information3. Aviation Activity Forecasts
3. Aviation Activity Forecasts This section presents forecasts of aviation activity for the Airport through 2029. Forecasts were developed for enplaned passengers, air carrier and regional/commuter airline
More informationNOTES ON COST AND COST ESTIMATION by D. Gillen
NOTES ON COST AND COST ESTIMATION by D. Gillen The basic unit of the cost analysis is the flight segment. In describing the carrier s cost we distinguish costs which vary by segment and those which vary
More informationAviation Trends. Quarter Contents
Aviation Trends Quarter 1 2013 Contents Introduction 2 1 Historical overview of traffic 3 a Terminal passengers b Commercial flights c Cargo tonnage 2 Terminal passengers at UK airports 7 3 Passenger flights
More informationAviation Trends. Quarter Contents
Aviation Trends Quarter 3 2014 Contents Introduction... 2 1. Historical overview of traffic... 3 a. Terminal passengers... 4 b. Commercial flights... 5 c. Cargo tonnage... 6 2. Terminal passengers at UK
More informationTRAFFIC COMMERCIAL AIR CARRIERS
INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION AIR TRANSPORT REPORTING FORM (01/00) Page of Contact person for inquiries: Organization: Tel.: Fax: E-mail: State: Air carrier: Month(s): Year: 20 TOTAL ALL SERVICES
More informationFalcon 2000S & Challenger 350 Analysis
Falcon 2000S & Challenger 350 Analysis Aviation's Most Real World Operating Cost Application. Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Dassault Falcon 2000S Min Crew / Max Passengers 2 / 10 Seats Full Range (NM / SM)
More informationThe offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10
The 747 8 offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. 14 aero quarterly qtr_03 10 Operating the 747 8 at Existing Airports Today s major airports are
More informationPerformance monitoring report for 2014/15
Performance monitoring report for 20/15 Date of issue: August 2015 Gatwick Airport Limited Summary Gatwick Airport is performing well for passengers and airlines, and in many aspects is ahead of the performance
More informationRunway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport
APPENDIX 2 Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport May 11, 2009 Version 2 (draft) Table of Contents Introduction... 1-1 Section 1 Purpose & Need... 1-2 Section 2 Design Standards...1-3 Section
More informationGuyana Civil Aviation Authority. ATR Form M Instructions
Guyana Civil Aviation Authority ATR Form M Instructions P a g e 2 Submission of ATR Forms The ATR Forms were developed in MS Excel so as to be used to submit data electronically. Completed electronic ATR
More information! Figure 1. Proposed Cargo Ramp at the end of Taxiway Echo.! Assignment 7: Airport Capacity and Geometric Design. Problem 1
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2014 Assignment 7: Airport Capacity and Geometric Design Solution Instructor: Trani Problem 1 An airport is designing a new ramp area to accommodate three Boeing
More informationEXHIBIT E to Signatory Airline Agreement for Palm Beach International Airport RATE AND FEE SCHEDULE
EXHIBIT E to Signatory Airline Agreement for Palm Beach International Airport RATE AND FEE SCHEDULE SECTION I - DEFINITIONS The following words, terms and phrases used in this Exhibit E shall have the
More informationReporting Instructions FILING REQUIREMENTS
FORM D FLEET AND PERSONNEL COMMERCIAL AIR CARRIERS Reporting Instructions General FILING REQUIREMENTS This form is to be used by ICAO Member States to report aircraft fleet and personnel statistics for
More informationSafety 2010: A marginal average year in global Aviation Safety
Safety 2: A marginal average year in global Aviation Safety The year 2 was one of the best in aviation in terms of safety; however, as shown by the Safety Survey 2 data, runway safety remains a top priority.
More informationFrequently Asked Questions. Free allocation from the Special Reserve (Art 3f ETS Directive 1 )
Brussels, 19 March 2015 Frequently Asked Questions Free allocation from the Special Reserve (Art 3f ETS Directive 1 ) 1. Has Regulation (EU) No 421/2014 2 had an impact on the amount of allowances in the
More informationSession 2: CORSIA MRV System: Monitoring of CO 2 Emissions
ICAO Regional Seminar on CORSIA Session 2: CORSIA MRV System: Monitoring of CO 2 Emissions ICAO Secretariat Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) of CO 2 Emissions A monitoring, reporting and verification
More informationGold Coast Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report
Gold Coast Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report Quarter 3 2012 (July to September) 1 Version Control Version Number Detail Prepared by Date 1 - Environment 2 November 2012 2 Updated Figure 10 Environment
More informationAnnual & Hourly Cost Detail
King Air 350i Annual & Hourly Cost Detail GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 2 / 8 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 1404.00 / 1615.69 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 302.25 / 347.82 Average Pre-Owned
More informationAIRPORT FEES & CHARGES
AIRPORT FEES & CHARGES YEAR 2018 1. REGULATED FEES 1.1. BOARDING PASSENGERS FEE 1.2. LANDING FEES 1.3. TAKE OFF FEES 1.4. PARKING CHARGE 1.5. FEE ON ARRIVING AND DEPARTING FREIGHT 1.6. PRM CHARGE 1.7.
More informationRunway 35 South & West (Jet) Departure Flight Path Amendment
Environmental Assessment Runway 35 South & West (Jet) Departure Flight Path Amendment Canberra Airport Airservices Australia 1 of 8 Environment Assessment Runway 35 South & West (Jet) Departure & North
More informationEstimating the Risk of a New Launch Vehicle Using Historical Design Element Data
International Journal of Performability Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 6, November 2013, pp. 599-608. RAMS Consultants Printed in India Estimating the Risk of a New Launch Vehicle Using Historical Design Element
More informationCEE Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications. January 2018
CEE 5614 Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering January 2018 1 Material Presented The aircraft and its impact operations in the NAS
More informationKey Performance Indicators
Key Performance Indicators The first section of this document looks at key performance indicators (KPIs) that are relevant in SkyChess. KPIs are useful as a measure of productivity, which can be sub-divided
More informationSensitivity Analysis for the Integrated Safety Assessment Model (ISAM) John Shortle George Mason University May 28, 2015
Sensitivity Analysis for the Integrated Safety Assessment Model (ISAM) John Shortle George Mason University May 28, 2015 Acknowledgments Sherry Borener, FAA Alan Durston, Brian Hjelle, Saab Sensis Seungwon
More informationAirfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni
Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni Istanbul Technical University Air Transportation Management M.Sc. Program Air Transportation Systems and Infrastructure Module 5 May 25, 2015 Objective and
More informationAdvisory Circular (AC)
Advisory Circular (AC) Certification of Transport Category Aeroplanes On Narrow Runways File No. 5009-6-525 AC No. 525-014 RDIMS No. 528471-V3 Issue No. 01 Issuing Branch Aircraft Certification Effective
More informationRegional Jets ,360 A319/ , , , ,780
Excel Tab Name: Seats (18 MAP) PASSENGER AIRLINE FLIGHT SCHEDULE CALCULATION RECORD Summary 17.2 MAP flight schedule* (with Southwest Airlines B737-800s changed to B737-700s) Number of Total Seats Avg.
More informationNational Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first
National Passenger Survey putting rail passengers first What is Passenger Focus? Passenger Focus is the independent national rail consumer watchdog. Our mission is to get the best deal for Britain s rail
More informationAviation Trends Quarter
Aviation Trends Quarter 4 214 Contents Introduction... 2 1. Historical overview of traffic see note 5 on p.15... 3 a. Terminal passengers... 4 b. Commercial flights... 5 c. Cargo tonnage... 6 2. Terminal
More informationAirfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni
Airfield Geometric Design Prof. Amedeo Odoni Istanbul Technical University Air Transporta5on Management M.Sc. Program Air Transporta5on Systems and Infrastructure Module 4 28 April 2014 Objective and Outline!
More informationAnnual & Hourly Cost Detail
Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Embraer Phenom 300 GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 2 / 7 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 1662.38 / 1913.03 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 419.25 / 482.46 Average Pre-Owned
More informationERCD REPORT Strategic Noise Maps for Heathrow Airport J Lee L Edmonds J Patel
Environmental Research and Consultancy Department Directorate of Airspace Policy Civil Aviation Authority ERCD REPORT 1204 Strategic Noise Maps for Heathrow Airport 2011 J Lee L Edmonds J Patel Prepared
More informationMaximum Levels of Airport Charges
Maximum Levels of Airport Charges Annual Compliance Statement for Regulatory Year 24 September 2002 to 23 September 2003 and Provisional Price Caps for Regulatory Year 24 September 2003 to 23 September
More informationAnnual & Hourly Cost Detail
Annual & Hourly Cost Detail EADS Socata TBM 700C2 GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 1 / 5 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 975.00 / 1122.01 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 282.75 / 325.38 Average
More informationHIGH FUEL PRICES DRIVE HALF YEAR PROFIT DOWN 62% AMIDST CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT
3 November 2011 Page 1 of 4 No. 06/11 03 November 2011 HIGH FUEL PRICES DRIVE HALF YEAR PROFIT DOWN 62% AMIDST CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENT GROUP FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE First Half 2011-12 The Group made a net
More informationCharges & fees at Brussels Airport Effective as from 1 November, 2018
Charges & fees at Brussels Airport Effective as from 1 November, 2018 V1: Dec 2017 V2: Feb 2018 (CUP fee correction) V3: Apr 2018 (CUP fee update 2018) V4: Jul 2018 (Intermediate tariff consultation update)
More informationRoute Support Cork Airport Route Support Scheme ( RSS ) Short-Haul Operations Valid from 1st January Introduction
Route Support Cork Airport Route Support Scheme ( RSS ) Short-Haul Operations Valid from 1st January 2016 1. Introduction Cork Airport is committed to encouraging airlines to operate new routes to/from
More informationAPPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR
APPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR This appendix sets forth the detailed input data that was used to prepare noise exposure contours for 2022 Baseline conditions. H.1 DATA SOURCES AND ASSUMPTIONS
More informationTHE PERFORMANCE OF DUBLIN AIRPORT:
THE PERFORMANCE OF DUBLIN AIRPORT: THE FINDINGS OF THE COMPARATIVE REPORTS OF THE TRL AND THE ATRS MAY 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...2 2 MAIN TRL FINDINGS ON THE RELATIVE OPERATING COSTS OF DUBLIN
More informationP.001.FPG FUEL PLANNING GUIDE. First Edition
P.001.FPG FUEL PLANNING GUIDE First Edition Edited by: Approved by: Wilhelm Andrei Bubeneck Division Training Coordinator Lucian Cristea Division Director P.001.FPG Version 1.0 September 15, 2014 Page
More informationMeeting Summary ABE Master Plan Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting #3 August 15, Shannon Eibert, C&S Companies
Meeting Summary ABE Master Plan Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting #3 August 15, 2017 Prepared by: File: Attendees: Shannon Eibert, C&S Companies N93.012.001 See Sign-In List A third meeting was held
More informationBird Strike Damage Rates for Selected Commercial Jet Aircraft Todd Curtis, The AirSafe.com Foundation
Bird Strike Rates for Selected Commercial Jet Aircraft http://www.airsafe.org/birds/birdstrikerates.pdf Bird Strike Damage Rates for Selected Commercial Jet Aircraft Todd Curtis, The AirSafe.com Foundation
More informationTrend
Fact Sheet - Safety Safety Trends Accident Overview 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Trend Average 2009-2013 Yearly Flights (Millions)* 33.2 34.0 35.0 35.6 36.2 38.0 34.8 Total Accidents 90 94 92 75 81 73
More informationAerodrome Obstacle Survey Information Checks
United Kingdom Overseas Territories Aviation Circular OTAC 139-20 Aerodrome Obstacle Survey Information Checks Issue 2.00 26 May 2017 Effective on issue GENERAL Overseas Territories Aviation Circulars
More informationDe luchtvaart in het EU-emissiehandelssysteem. Summary
Summary On 1 January 2012 the aviation industry was brought within the European Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and must now purchase emission allowances for some of its CO 2 emissions. At a price of
More information1) Complete the Queuing Diagram by filling in the sequence of departing flights. The grey cells represent the departure slot (10 pts)
FLIGHT DELAYS/DETERMINISTIC QUEUEING MODELS Three airlines (A, B, C) have scheduled flights (1 n) for the morning peak hour departure bank as described in the chart below. There is a single runway that
More informationTECHNICAL NOTE: Edinburgh Airport new SIDs ACP reworking of noise contours for revised Runway 06 SIDs
TECHNICAL NOTE: Edinburgh Airport new SIDs ACP reworking of noise contours for revised Runway 06 SIDs Introduction ERCD was commissioned by NATS to rework the Edinburgh Airport ACP summer day Leq contours
More informationWashington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update. Ultimate Operations 5th Working Group Briefing 9/25/18
Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update Ultimate Operations 5th Working Group Briefing 9/25/18 Meeting Purpose Discuss methodology of Ultimate build scenario operations
More informationDenis Leger, Commissioner Transportation, Facilities and Emergency Services. SUBJECT: Airport Aeronautical and Public Parking Fees,
CITY OF KINGSTON REPORT TO COUNCIL Report No.: 13-321 TO: FROM: RESOURCE STAFF: Mayor and Members of Council Denis Leger, Commissioner Transportation, Facilities and Emergency Services Sheila Kidd, Director
More informationHOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING
HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING Ms. Grace Fattouche Abstract This paper outlines a scheduling process for improving high-frequency bus service reliability based
More informationCitation XLS Analysis - Owner & Charter Hour Contributions. Prepared March 31, 2017
Citation XLS Analysis - Owner & Charter Hour Contributions Prepared March 31, 2017 Aviation's Most Real World Operating Cost Application. Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Cessna Citation XLS Min Crew / Max
More informationCairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report. Quarter (July to September)
Cairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report Quarter 3 2012 (July to September) 1 Version Control Version Number Detail Prepared by Date 1 - Environment 19 December 2012 Airservices Australia. All
More informationAssignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design. Aircraft Engine Remarks. CFM56-7B20/-7B22/-7B24 developing 20,000 lb of thrust at sea level
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2014 Solution! Assignment 3: Runway Length and EMAS Design Instructor: Trani Problem 1 A new airport to be constructed near Mexico City airport would like to
More informationRISK ANALYSIS IN THE SURROUNDING AREAS OF ONE-RUNWAY AIRPORTS: A METHODOLOGY TO PRELIMINARY CALCULUS OF PSZs DIMENSIONS
RISK ANALYSIS IN THE SURROUNDING AREAS OF ONE-RUNWAY AIRPORTS: A METHODOLOGY TO PRELIMINARY CALCULUS OF PSZs DIMENSIONS P. Di Mascio and G. Loprencipe Department of Civil, Constructional and Environmental
More informationWorldwide, the likelihood
BY RICK DARBY Slippery When Wet Grooved runways help, but a variety of other safety measures also could reduce wet-runway overruns. Worldwide, the likelihood of a jet or large turboprop overrunning the
More informationProduced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director
Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism Norfolk - 2017 Contents Page Summary Results 2 Contextual analysis 4 Volume of Tourism 7 Staying Visitors - Accommodation
More informationSchedule Compression by Fair Allocation Methods
Schedule Compression by Fair Allocation Methods by Michael Ball Andrew Churchill David Lovell University of Maryland and NEXTOR, the National Center of Excellence for Aviation Operations Research November
More informationAnalysis of Air Transportation Systems. Airport Capacity
Analysis of Air Transportation Systems Airport Capacity Dr. Antonio A. Trani Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Fall 2002 Virginia
More informationOperational Performance and Capacity Assessment for Perth Airport
Operational Performance and Capacity Assessment for Perth Airport Version - 4.1 25 July 2012 Prepared by: NATS Consultancy Page 1 The recipient of this material relies upon its content at their own risk,
More informationPublished by the Stationery Office, Dublin, Ireland. Government Publications Sales Office, Sun Alliance House, Molesworth Street, Dublin 2,
Published by the Stationery Office, Dublin, Ireland. To be purchased from the: Central Statistics Office, Information Section, Skehard Road, Cork, Government Publications Sales Office, Sun Alliance House,
More informationNOTE TO INQUIRY BACKGROUND CRASH RATE DEFINITIONS. TRUDY AUTY, BSc, ARCS FOR LAAG
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 - SECTION 77 AND TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) RULES 2000 APPLICATIONS BY LONDON ASHFORD AIRPORT LTD SITE AT LONDON ASHFORD AIRPORT LIMITED,
More informationPROBABILISTIC MODEL FOR AIRPORT RUNWAY SAFETY AREAS
TRANSPORT PROBLEMS 2017 Volume 12 Issue 2 PROBLEMY TRANSPORTU DOI: 10.20858/tp.2017.12.2.9 Keywords: take-off; landing; runway; safety area; probability; distance Stanislav SZABO*, Peter VITTEK, Jakub
More informationERCD REPORT Strategic Noise Maps for Gatwick Airport J Lee L Edmonds J Patel
Environmental Research and Consultancy Department Directorate of Airspace Policy Civil Aviation Authority ERCD REPORT 1205 Strategic Noise Maps for Gatwick Airport 2011 J Lee L Edmonds J Patel Prepared
More informationFACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW
FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW This summary is intended to provide a brief overview of the key issues associated with conformance to FAA standards at Methow Valley State Airport.
More informationAssignment 9: APM and Queueing Analysis
CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2014 Assignment 9: APM and Queueing Analysis Solution Instructor: Trani Problem 1 a) An international airport has two parallel runways separated 800 meters
More informationQueenstown aerodrome price proposal for night operations and building upgrade. For aircraft over five tonnes
Queenstown aerodrome price proposal for night operations and building upgrade. For aircraft over five tonnes 29 October 2014 1 Purpose This document outlines Airways proposed price increase for new lights
More informationProduced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director
Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism North Norfolk District - 2016 Contents Page Summary Results 2 Contextual analysis 4 Volume of Tourism 7 Staying Visitors
More informationProduced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director
Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director Economic Impact of Tourism Norfolk - 2016 Contents Page Summary Results 2 Contextual analysis 4 Volume of Tourism 7 Staying Visitors - Accommodation
More informationACTION PLAN SUMMARY I. IMPROVING TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND RELATED RULES. NOX More stringent international rules By 2001 (33 rd ICAO Assembly)
ACTION PLAN SUMMARY AREA OBJECTIVES/TARGETS/ACTIONS TARGET DATES I. IMPROVING TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND RELATED RULES 1. Noise More stringent international standards and rules for transition By 21 (33 rd
More informationInteractive x-via web analyses and simulation tool.
Interactive x-via web analyses and simulation tool. Scope of services: - Intra-modal analyses and simulation of the European air passenger transport - Provision of a reference case of the year n-1. - Representative
More informationTallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016
Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016 Agenda Welcome / Introductions Master Plan Process and Project Status Forecast of Aviation Demand
More informationTHIRD QUARTER PROFIT DOWN 43% TO $337 MILLION
THIRD QUARTER PROFIT DOWN 43% TO $337 MILLION GROUP FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Third Quarter 2008-09 The Group earned a net profit attributable to equity holders of $337 million for the third quarter (October
More informationReport on Geographic Scope of Market-based Measures (MBMS)
Report on Geographic Scope of Market-based Measures (MBMS) Analysis of proposed approaches for the coverage of international aviation emissions under a market-based measure This report is intended to address
More informationAppendix B CLEAR ZONES AND ACCIDENT POTENTIAL ZONES
Appendix B CLEAR ZONES AND ACCIDENT POTENTIAL ZONES 2007 AICUZ Study B-1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK B-2 2007 AICUZ Study CLEAR ZONES AND ACCIDENT POTENTIAL ZONES B.1 Guidelines For Accident Potential
More informationNoise data for the first 17 months of Boeing 787 operations at Heathrow airport
Environmental Research and Consultancy Department Noise data for the first 17 months of Boeing 787 operations at Heathrow airport CAP 1191 Civil Aviation Authority 2014 All rights reserved. Copies of this
More informationAIRSERVICES AUSTALIA DRAFT PRICING NOTIFICATION REGIONAL EXPRESS SUBMISSION TO THE ACCC MAY 2011
AIRSERVICES AUSTALIA DRAFT PRICING NOTIFICATION REGIONAL EXPRESS SUBMISSION TO THE ACCC MAY 2011 1. Introduction This submission is provided to the ACCC by Regional Express Holdings Ltd in response to
More informationAviation Trends. Quarter Contents
Aviation Trends Quarter 3 215 Contents Introduction... 2 1. Historical overview of traffic... 3 a. Terminal passengers... 4 b. Commercial flights... 5 c. Cargo tonnage... 6 2. Terminal passengers at UK
More informationUC Berkeley Working Papers
UC Berkeley Working Papers Title The Value Of Runway Time Slots For Airlines Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/69t9v6qb Authors Cao, Jia-ming Kanafani, Adib Publication Date 1997-05-01 escholarship.org
More informationEnvironmental charging review of impact of noise and NOx landing charges: update 2017
Environmental Research and Consultancy Department Environmental charging review of impact of noise and NOx landing charges: update 2017 CAP 1576 Published by the Civil Aviation Authority, 2017 Civil Aviation
More informationCommunity Impact: Focus on Barston
Community Impact: Focus on Barston With flights to more than 140 destinations worldwide and a workforce of more than 6,000 people, Birmingham is the UK s 7th largest airport and an economic powerhouse,
More informationEstimating passenger mobility by tourism statistics
Estimating passenger mobility by tourism statistics Paolo Bolsi DG MOVE - Unit A3 Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment 2 nd International Forum Statistical meeting 1-2 April 2015 Passenger mobility
More informationBriefing note for new Air Passenger Duty operators
Briefing note for new Air Passenger Duty operators 1. Background 1.1. Ministers announced in the 2011 Autumn Statement that with effect from 1 2013, Air Passenger Duty (APD) will be extended to the carriage
More informationBUSINESS AVIATION INTERNATIONAL CHALLENGES AND ISSUES. A presentation to the ICAO Council
BUSINESS AVIATION INTERNATIONAL CHALLENGES AND ISSUES A presentation to the ICAO Council 10 June 2010 Today s Aim o To familiarize you with the aims and activities of the IBAC Council and the business
More informationTechnical Memorandum. Synopsis. Steve Carrillo, PE. Bryan Oscarson/Carmen Au Lindgren, PE. April 3, 2018 (Revised)
Appendix D Orange County/John Wayne Airport (JWA) General Aviation Improvement Program (GAIP) Based Aircraft Parking Capacity Analysis and General Aviation Constrained Forecasts Technical Memorandum To:
More information