RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT JUNE 2016
|
|
- Kerry Jones
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2. Purpose and Need 2.1 Background The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (the Authority) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed redevelopment of Terminal B/C, including a Secure National Hall and a New North Concourse (NNC), and related improvements at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). The EA is being prepared pursuant to the requirements and guidelines of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Order F, 1 FAA Order B, 2 and the FAA Order F Desk Reference. 3 The objectives of this section are to: Define the Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action, where Need is defined as the problem the Authority is facing, and Purpose is defined as the Authority s proposed solution to the problem Describe the Authority s Proposed Action Identify the actions requested of the FAA Define the estimated timeframe for FAA actions and implementation of the Proposed Action The Authority operates the Airport, which occupies approximately 733 acres of land and 127 acres of water along the western shore of the Potomac River in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Airport is located in Arlington County, immediately north of the City of Alexandria, Virginia, and across the Potomac River from Washington, D.C. The regional setting of the Airport is shown on Exhibit 2-1. The current Airport Layout Plan is shown on Exhibit Federal Aviation Administration, Order F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, July 16, Federal Aviation Administration, Order B, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions, April 28, Federal Aviation Administration, Order F, Desk Reference, July Purpose and Need [2-1]
2 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-2] Purpose and Need
3 R O N A L D R E A G A N W A S H I N G TO N N AT I O N A L A I R P O R T JUNE 2016 MARYLAND WASHIN GTON, D.C. o Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) VIRGINIA EXHIBIT 2-1 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLor me, U SG S, Intermap, increment P Corp., N RCA N, Esr i Japan, M ETI, Esri China (Hong Ko ng), Esri (T hail and ), M apm yind ia, OpenSt reetm ap contri butor s, and the G IS U ser Comm uni ty SOURCE: Contri butor s, and the G IS U ser Comm uni ty (Basemap), June PR EPAR ED BY: Ri co ndo & Asso ciates, Inc., June [ NORTH Regional Setting 0 5 Miles W:\Projects\DCA\NNC EA\MXD's\Exhibit 2-1 DCA Regional Setting_ mxd Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements Draf t EA Purpose and Need
4 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-4] Purpose and Need
5 R O N A L D R E AG A N WA S H I N G TO N N AT I O N A L A I R P O R T JUNE 2016 SOURCE: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., March PREPARED BY: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., January NORTH 0 Not To Scale Z:\MWAA\DCA\Graphics\DCA Terminal B-C EA Exhibits\January 2016\Exhibit 2-2 DCA Airport Layout Plan REV -11x17.indd Purpose and Need EXHIBIT 2-2 Airport Layout Plan
6 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-6] Purpose and Need
7 2.2 Existing Conditions Exhibit 2-3 depicts the Terminal B/C Redevelopment and Secure National Hall project sites. Structures located within the limits of the NNC project site include the Authority s Corporate Office Building (COB), Hangar 11, and Hangar 12 as well as surface parking associated with these facilities. Existing airline operational areas include 14 remote regional aircraft parking positions currently operated by American Airlines (formerly US Airways). The FAA defines a regional airline as one that provides service primarily via aircraft with 89 or fewer seats. 4 For the purposes of this analysis, regional aircraft are defined as short- to medium-haul aircraft that have a single aisle and typically are configured with no more than four abreast seating in the main cabin. Regional aircraft at DCA include, but are not limited to: Bombardier CRJ200, CRJ700, and CRJ900 series; Bombardier Dash 8 (turboprop); and Embraer ERJ 145, EMB170, and EMB175 series GATES 35 AND 35X To the east of the Authority s COB and Hangars 11 and 12, and to the north of Terminal B/C, is the American Airlines (AA) remote gate operation that comprises 14 hardstands (i.e., an off-gate aircraft parking area). Passengers waiting to board aircraft utilizing these 14 hardstands are currently served by a passenger holdroom area at Gate 35X on the apron level directly adjacent to a bus curb. The gate area is under-sized for its current use. This includes circulation corridors, holdrooms, airport support areas, and passenger amenities. When the apron level holdroom becomes congested, passengers also use the holdroom area at Gate 35 on the concourse level or congregate in the hallway of the North Pier of Terminal B/C. The volume of passengers in the holdroom areas at Gates 35 and 35X exceeds acceptable levels of service (LOS), as quantified using the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Airport Development Reference Manual (ADRM). The ADRM identifies specific guidelines based on square feet per passenger and general planning parameters, such as maximum size aircraft served by the holdroom. The ADRM identifies LOS categories as Over-Design, Optimum, and Suboptimum. 5 The existing holdroom area that serves both Gate 35 and Gate 35X is essentially a one-aircraft holding area. As a result, at any given time, a larger narrow-body aircraft could be using the passenger loading bridge at Gate 35, and up to 14 regional aircraft could be using the adjacent Gate 35X holding area at the apron level. Under this demand, the holdrooms would be categorized as Suboptimum from an IATA ADRM perspective. The undersized holdrooms also contribute to terminal congestion, result in confusion during multiple concurrent flight calls, and provide a poor overall passenger experience. 4 5 Federal Aviation Administration, FAA Aerospace Forecast, Fiscal Years , March International Air Transport Association, Airport Development Reference Manual 10th Edition, 3rd Release), August 2015, Section Purpose and Need [2-7]
8 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-8] Purpose and Need
9 0 Not to Scale Purpose and Need Drawing: C:\_AGDAssociates\Projects\MWAA\DCA\2015-Task03-EnvironmentalAssessment\ _REPORT EXHIBITS TASK\Exhibits\Delivery _DCA_BCRedevEA-Exhibits_2_03.dwg_Layout: EXH_2-3_Jan 13, 2016, 7:40pm NORTH PREPARED BY: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., March 2015; AGD Associates, LLC., June SOURCE: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., March 2015; AGD Associates, LLC., March 2015 Secure National Hall Project Site New North Concourse Project LEGEND Corporate Office Building Hangars 11 and 12 Project Site EXHIBIT 2-3 JUNE 2016
10 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-10] Purpose and Need
11 2.2.2 HARDSTAND AND REMIAN OVERNIGHT PARKING POSITIONS The American Airlines hardstand area includes up to 14 regional aircraft passenger loading positions and two remain overnight (RON) parking positions. The location of the hardstands requires bus transport of passengers from/to the AA facilities in the North Pier. A bus pick-up/drop-off area for transport to and from the 14 remote regional aircraft parking positions is provided at Gate 35X. The RON positions are used for overnight or otherwise temporary parking and passenger loading does not occur from the two existing RON positions. Exhibit 2-4 illustrates a representative aircraft parking layout at the hardstand area as well as the bus route from the North Pier of Terminal B/C. Buses operating on the aircraft ramp add additional congestion to the ramp and exacerbate the inherent problems created when mixing aircraft and service vehicle traffic. To board and deplane, passengers must walk outside between the aircraft and the bus, as well as between the bus and the holdroom area. This is particularly inconvenient and can be unsafe in inclement weather without the benefit of a covered walkway. This adds to the passengers inconvenience and further impacts this part of the terminal s LOS SECURITY IN THE NATIONAL HALL Currently, there are three security screening checkpoints (SSCPs) located at the connection between the National Hall and each pier (see Exhibit 2-5). Airline passengers transferring between piers to connecting flights must either take a bus or exit the secure area of the arrival pier and clear security again at the SSCP of the departing pier. With most passengers desire to clear security as soon as possible, they pass through the National Hall and the SSCP expeditiously to wait for their flight at the departure gate. The inefficiency of this passenger flow increases the time to make a flight connection between piers, increases security lines, causes crowding in the pier holdrooms and hallways, and inconveniences passengers. The National Hall was designed for passengers to enjoy the numerous eating establishments, shop at the retail outlets, and relax in the open spaces; it is the only location with full-service restaurants in the airport. When passengers pass through the National Hall quickly to get through the SSCPs they are unable to take advantage of the amenities in National Hall. 2.3 Purpose and Need Statement THE PROBLEM (NEED) The need for both the proposed Terminal B/C redevelopment and Secure National Hall is to improve the overall existing passenger experience and safety at DCA. The passenger demand generated by the remote airline operation continues to result in poor LOS in the North Pier of Terminal B/C. The Terminal B/C redevelopment would provide a more efficient and safe regional aircraft operation, a higher LOS, and better quality of service to passengers currently utilizing the hardstand areas. Additionally, the proposed Secure National Hall would improve the movement of passengers through improving security, decrease Transportation Security Agency (TSA) staffing needs, eliminate busing operations, and enable connecting passengers between piers/concourses to transition in a more efficient, and customer friendly, environment. Having the National Hall post-security would enable passengers to spend more time in the National Hall before proceeding to the departure gate. This would reduce overcrowding in the pier holdrooms and hallways, and secondarily allow passengers time to utilize the amenities in the Secure National Hall. Purpose and Need [2-11]
12 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-12] Purpose and Need
13 CRJ D.1 D JUNE 2016 DROP OFF LANE NEW BUS LANE NEW BUS LANE Two A319 aircraft remain overnight parking positions GATE 35X COB Hangar 12 Hangar 11 LEGEND Hardstand Position Contact Position SOURCE: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., January PREPARED BY: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., January 2015; AGD Associates, LLC, June 2015 EXHIBIT 2-4 NORTH ft Aircraft Parking Layout at the American Airlines Hardstand Area Drawing: E:\_AGDAssociates\Projects\MWAA\DCA\2016-DCA-ReportNT\Drawings\ RevisedExhibits\160428_DCA_BCRedevEA-Exhibits_02_04.dwg_Layout: EXH_2-4_Apr 28, 2016, 8:04pm Purpose and Need
14 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-14] Purpose and Need
15 JUNE 2016 Departures Level Existing Security Checkpoint Existing Security Checkpoint Existing Security Checkpoint LEGEND Space Description Nonsecure Area, Public/Nonpublic Checkpoint/ Queuing Area Secure Area, Public/Nonpublic Passenger Flows Departures Departures Secure Arrivals SOURCE: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Terminal B/C Advance Planning - Secure Terminal Report, January PREPARED BY: AGD Associates, LLC, August EXHIBIT 2-5 NORTH 0 Not to Scale Secure National Hall Circulation Flows and Security Checkpoint Location Existing Security Screening Checkpoints Drawing: E:\_AGDAssociates\Projects\MWAA\DCA\2016-DCA-ReportNT\Drawings\ RevisedExhibits\160428_DCA_BCRedevEA-Exhibits_02_05.dwg_Layout: Layout1_Apr 28, 2016, 8:46pm Purpose and Need
16 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-16] Purpose and Need
17 The current operation involves bussing passengers from a holdroom area at Gate 35X that supports all 14 remote hardstand positions. Passengers are held in the Gate 35X holdroom area on the apron level and the Gate 35 holdroom area on the concourse level of the North Pier; neither area provides adequate space for the volume of passengers using these gates and, as a result, passengers are typically seen sitting and standing in the circulation corridor adjacent to Gate 35 waiting for their flight s departure. At flight departure time, gate calls are made in order to direct passengers to doors at the apron level that lead to a waiting bus. The bus then delivers the passengers to the appropriate remote commuter aircraft hardstand position, where the passengers must board the aircraft via a ramp/stairway. For the arriving passenger process, the bus picks up the passengers at the remote commuter aircraft hardstand position and then delivers the passengers to a door at Gate 35X, where they are directed upstairs for a connecting flight or to exit the pier. During each of the bus-to-aircraft or bus-to-gate transfers, the passengers could be exposed to inclement weather (wind, rain, snow, and ice). The overall LOS of passengers utilizing Gates 35 and 35X (hardstands) does not meet the Airport s core values of providing a safe, predictable, and enjoyable travel experience. Ideally, passengers would be able to walk to their gate holdroom area, which would be sized appropriately for the aircraft, and board using passenger loading bridges (PLBs). This is the standard mode of operation for all other gates at DCA and at most commercial airports in the United States. The current location of the SSCPs requires the TSA to staff three SSCP locations, discourages passengers from spending time in the National Hall, and causes overcrowding within the piers. Departing passengers typically want to clear security as soon as possible. With the SSCPs in their current locations, this prevents passengers from spending time in the National Hall and forces them to congregate on the piers, which creates congestion in the piers. Also, airline passengers transferring between piers to connecting flights must either take a bus between piers or exit the secure area of the arrival pier and clear security again at the SSCP of the departing pier, which increases congestion at the SSCPs and introduces additional time requirements for the travelling passengers. Over the last decade, the Airport has experienced an increase in connecting passengers, as shown in Table 2-1. Presently, American Airlines has the largest percentage of connecting passengers at 31 percent. Among all airlines, 22 percent of the passengers are connecting. The percentage of connecting passengers is expected to remain level at 22 percent in the future. The current SSCPs have an overall negative impact on departing and connecting passengers and require additional staffing by TSA. Purpose and Need [2-17]
18 AMERICAN/US AIRWAYS 1/ OTHER AIRLINES AIRPORT TOTAL ORIGINATING (%) ,097,531 1,173,949 73% 27% 3,418, ,264 93% 7% 6,515,858 1,436,213 82% 18% ,625,647 1,350,333 73% 27% 3,775, ,600 96% 4% 7,401,341 1,507,933 83% 17% ,609,082 1,626,757 69% 31% 3,866, ,129 97% 3% 7,475,933 1,763,885 81% 19% ,750,601 1,578,448 70% 30% 3,768, ,988 95% 5% 7,518,641 1,775,436 81% 19% ,371,614 1,778,006 65% 35% 3,568, ,007 93% 7% 6,939,818 2,038,013 77% 23% ,341,828 1,669,731 67% 33% 3,431, ,743 91% 9% 6,773,769 1,993,474 77% 23% ,608,248 1,571,800 70% 30% 3,485, ,565 90% 10% 7,094,178 1,941,366 79% 21% ,478,072 1,550,281 69% 31% 3,895, ,645 90% 10% 7,373,886 1,988,926 79% 21% ,778,254 1,809,288 68% 32% 3,883, ,390 92% 8% 7,661,477 2,126,678 78% 22% ,062,204 1,992,077 67% 33% 3,854, ,768 93% 7% 7,916,850 2,280,846 78% 22% ,025,636 1,789,773 69% 31% 4,268, ,096 92% 8% 8,294,483 2,163,870 79% 21% ,158,000 1,849,000 69% 31% 5,055, ,700 87% 13% 9,213,800 2,598,700 78% 22% ,510,000 2,005,000 69% 31% 5,471, ,200 87% 13% 9,981,100 2,830,200 78% 22% ,893,000 2,176,000 69% 31% 5,921, ,500 87% 13% 10,814,200 3,086,500 78% 22% ,761,000 2,562,000 69% 31% 6,934,300 1,108,100 86% 14% 12,695,300 3,670,100 78% 22% [2-18] Purpose and Need Table 2-1: Historic and Forecast Originating versus Connection Passengers CALENDAR YEAR ORIGINATING PASSENGERS CONNECTING PASSENGERS ORIGINATING (%) CONNECTING (%) ORIGINATING PASSENGERS CONNECTING PASSENGERS ORIGINATING (%) CONNECTING (%) ORIGINATING PASSENGERS CONNECTING PASSENGERS CONNECTING (%) NOTES: 1/ Includes American Airlines, US Airways, America West, and regional commuter affiliates for American and US Airways. Airline enplaned passenger figures assumed to represent half of total passengers reported. Enplaned passenger totals exclude Non-Commercial passengers. SOURCES: Innovata (U.S. DOT DB1B ); Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (2014); Ricondo & Associates, Inc. ( ). PREPARED BY: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., April 2016.
19 2.3.2 THE AUTHORITY S SOLUTION (PURPOSE) Studies related to the redevelopment of the area north of Terminal B/C began in late 2011 and recommended a new NNC connected to Terminal B/C that would provide new contact gates in place of the existing regional hardstand aircraft positions. The contact gates would improve passenger safety and experience, as well as LOS, by facilitating the loading and unloading of aircraft using PLBs, similar to the existing operations at the Terminal B/C piers. In conjunction with NNC planning efforts, the Authority also focused study efforts on improving passenger flow among/between piers. This analysis advanced the conceptualization of secure terminals connected via a Secure National Hall. The Secure National Hall concept streamlines the movement of passengers through improved security, reduces the number of SSCPs/TSA staffing requirements, and provides connecting passengers secured, seamless flow between piers, as opposed to boarding a bus or exiting one secured pier to re-enter security in an adjacent pier within Terminal B/C and NNC. The Secure National Hall also improves the passenger experience by providing passengers the opportunity to spend more time in the National Hall post-security, which reduces overcrowding in the piers and allows passengers the opportunity to enjoy the views from the National Hall and to utilize the amenities found there. The preferred Secure National Hall concept includes new SSCPs constructed above the commercial and public vehicle arrivals level roadway and below the departures level roadway. The proposed north security checkpoint is positioned north of the north Metro pedestrian bridge so as not to require rebuilding of the Metro pedestrian bridge. The proposed south security checkpoint is positioned south of the south Metro pedestrian bridge so as not to require re-building of the Metro pedestrian bridge. Building on the analyses in these planning efforts, the Authority developed the proposed solution to the need for improved passenger convenience and more efficient security screening at DCA. New North Concourse: The NNC would replace the existing 14 regional aircraft hardstand positions with 14 contact gate positions at the NNC. The NNC would comprise a two to three-level structure, housing primarily holdrooms, public secure circulation and passenger amenities at the second/concourse level, airline operations space, airport spaces, and nonpublic secure circulation at the ground/apron level. If a third level is added, it would be similar in use to the existing concourses and could include an airline club room, meeting space, or restaurant concessions. Secure National Hall: The proposed Secure National Hall is intended to enable passengers to move more efficiently through improving security, decrease overcrowding in the piers, more efficiently handle TSAmandated passenger security screenings, provide interconnectivity between the existing and proposed piers of Terminal B/C, and eliminate an existing bussing operation between the center and north piers of Terminal B/C. The proposed Secure National Hall project would construct two new SSCPs over the commercial and public vehicle arrivals level roadway and below the departures level roadway (i.e., one north of the north Metro pedestrian bridge and the other south of the south Metro pedestrian bridge). The entire National Hall level of Terminal B/C would then be converted to a post-security secure area, allowing passengers to move freely between piers, without additional security screening requirements. Purpose and Need [2-19]
20 Related Improvements: In order to construct the NNC and Secure National Hall, the Authority s COB, Hangar 11, and Hangar 12 would be demolished and their associated functions would be relocated. The Central Utility Plant, airport security fence, and parking locations for aircraft that remain overnight would need to be modified. In the area of the Secure National Hall, concession areas would need to be modified or relocated. In order to accommodate aircraft pushbacks from the NNC, a new Taxiway N2 would be added. Taxiway S pavement, from Runway to Taxiway N, would be removed. The proposed solution described in this section, and the related improvements required to implement this solution, are referred to as the Proposed Action and are described in Section SUMMARY OF THE AUTHORITY S PURPOSE AND NEED The overall LOS for passengers utilizing Gates 35 and 35X does not meet the Airport s core values of providing a safe, predictable, and enjoyable travel experience. The volume of passengers in the holdroom areas at Gates 35 and 35X exceeds acceptable LOS and contributes to congestion, results in confusion during multiple concurrent flight calls, and provides a poor overall passenger experience. Passengers must board a bus at the gate, travel to the hardstand apron, and load aircraft via a ramp/stairway. Additionally, passengers could be exposed to inclement weather (wind, rain, snow, ice) when boarding/unboarding busses and aircraft, which increases the risk of an accident. With the current SSCPs at each pier, passengers are not able to fully utilize the National Hall, which causes overcrowding in the piers and requires additional TSA staffing. Additionally, connecting passengers transferring between piers must either take a bus or exit the secure area of the arrival pier and clear security again at the SSCP of the departing pier, which increases congestion at the SSCPs, introduces additional time requirements for the travelling passengers, and further degrades the passenger s experience. The Proposed Action would enhance passenger and airline operations by creating a safer and more convenient facility that provides a more equitable LOS for all gates, as well as convenient access between all gates for connecting passengers. 2.4 Proposed Action The Authority s Proposed Action includes the key elements described below. All construction would take place on Airport land. New North Concourse - replacement of 14 regional aircraft hardstand positions with 14 regional aircraft contact gates - relocation of utilities in the NNC project area - modifications to Gate 35 (concourse level) and Gate 35X (apron level) [2-20] Purpose and Need
21 Secure National Hall - construction of two new SSCPs over the commercial and public vehicle arrivals level roadways and below the departures level roadways at the National Hall level (i.e., one north of the north Metro pedestrian bridge, the other south of the south Metro pedestrian bridge) - construction of new vertical circulation passenger corridors - modification and relocation of concessions areas and support space - conversion of National Hall to a post-security secure area Other Elements - demolition of the Authority s COB and relocation of the Authority s employees to an offsite location or other Authority office facilities at DCA or Washington Dulles International Airport - demolition of Hangar 11 and relocation of tenants to renovated facilities in the South Hangar Line area and historic Terminal A at DCA - demolition and replacement of Hangar 12 with a similar facility in the same general area - modifications to the hydrant fueling system including fuel lines and pits - modifications to site utilities including relocation - modifications to the Central Utility Plant - modifications to the airport security fence - relocation of parking locations for aircraft that remain overnight at DCA - removal of existing Taxiway S pavement from Runway to Taxiway N - addition of new connector Taxiway N2 from Taxiway N to Runway Exhibits 2-6 and 2-7 illustrate the Proposed Action for the NNC and Secure National Hall, respectively. Purpose and Need [2-21]
22 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-22] Purpose and Need
23 JUNE 2016 Addition of new connector Taxiway N2 from Taxiway N to Runway Removal of existing Taxiway S pavement from Runway to Taxiway N Other Elements: Modifications to the hydrant fueling system including fuel lines and pits as required Modifications to site utilities including relocation Modifications to the Central Utility Plant Relocation of Remain Overnight (RON) parking positions Access Road Potential Remain Overnight Parking Demolition of the Authority Corporate Office Building and relocation of the Authority's employees to an offsite location or other Authority office facilities at DCA or IAD New Hangar New North Concourse Demolition and replacement of Hangar 12 with a similar facility in the same general area Modifications to the airport security fence Demolition of Hangar 11 and relocation of tenants to renovated facilities in the South Hangar Line area and historic Terminal A at DCA SOURCE: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., Google Earth Pro 2016; Spot Image, April 23, (aerial photography - for visual reference only, may not be to scale) PREPARED BY: AGD Associates, LLC, April, EXHIBIT 2-6 NORTH 0 Not to Scale Proposed Action - New North Concourse Drawing: E:\_AGDAssociates\Projects\MWAA\DCA\2016-DCA-ReportNT\Drawings\ RevisedExhibits\160428_DCA_BCRedevEA-Exhibits_02_06.dwg_Layout: Layout1_Apr 28, 2016, 11:05pm Purpose and Need
24 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-24] Purpose and Need
25 EXHIBIT 2-7 JUNE 2016 Secure National Hall Air Intake Pylon at Terrace Area Metro Farecard Plaza Departures Curb Nonsecure Ticket Lobby Beyond Pedestrian Bridge Beyond Passenger Queue Area Security Checkpoint Mechanical Space Arrivals Curbside Private Vehicles Arrivals Curbside Commercial Vehicles Nonsecure Circulation to Baggage Claim LEGEND Nonsecure Circulation Secure Circulation Connector Floor Elevation from Security Screening Checkpoint to National Hall Beyond Secure Vertical Circulation to Baggage Claim Mechanical Space SOURCE: East-West Section Concourse and South Pier, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, June 1994; Ricondo & Associates, Inc., January 2015; AGD Associates, LLC, January PREPARED BY: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., June 2015; AGD Associates, LLC, August NORTH 0 Not to Scale Drawing: C:\_AGDAssociates\Projects\MWAA\DCA\2015-Task03-EnvironmentalAssessment\ _REPORT EXHIBITS TASK\Exhibits\Delivery _DCA_BCRedevEA-Exhibits_2_06.dwg_Layout: EXH_2-6_Jan 20, 2016, 7:00pm Purpose and Need Proposed Action - Secure National Hall
26 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-26] Purpose and Need
27 2.5 Federal Actions The FAA actions requested by the Authority include: Approval of the updated Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for DCA, depicting the proposed airfield pursuant to 49 United States Code (USC) 40103(b), 44718, and 47107(a)(16); 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace; and 14 CFR Part 157, Notice of Construction, Alteration, Activation, and Deactivation of Airports Determinations under 49 U.S.C and relating to the eligibility of the Proposed Action for federal funding under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) and/or under 49 U.S.C , as implemented by 14 CFR , to impose and use passenger facility charges (PFCs) collected at the Airport for the Proposed Action to assist with construction of potentially eligible development items shown on the ALP Determination under 49 USC 44502(b) that the Proposed Action is reasonably necessary for use in air commerce Determination that the Proposed Action would meet the federal Clean Air Act requirements Continued close coordination with the Authority and appropriate FAA program offices, as required for safety during construction pursuant to 14 CFR Part 139 under 49 USC Timeframe of the Proposed Action The Authority currently expects to submit the Final EA for the proposed improvements to the FAA in the third quarter of 2016 and anticipates that the FAA could issue its finding shortly thereafter. If the EA schedule is met and the FAA issues a favorable finding, then the Authority plans to: initiate construction of the NNC in the final quarter of 2016 and complete construction by the end of 2022, as well as initiate construction of the Secure National Hall enhancements in the second quarter of 2017 and complete construction by the second quarter of Purpose and Need [2-27]
28 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK [2-28] Purpose and Need
RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT NOVEMBER 2016
2. Purpose and Need 2.1 Background The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (the Authority) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed
More informationNOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018 LAWTON-FORT SILL REGIONAL AIRPORT LAWTON, OKLAHOMA PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE PROPOSED
More informationII. Purpose and Need. 2.1 Background
II. 2.1 Background The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority is preparing an Environmental Assessment of potential environmental impacts associated with proposed enhancements to the Runway 4-22 and
More informationINFORMATION PAPER TO THE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
INFORMATION PAPER TO THE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE BRIEFING ON RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AND WASHINGTON DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM APRIL 2015 2015 Use & Lease
More informationAppendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis
Appendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis ITB MAIN TERMINAL DEPARTURES LEVEL & BOARDING AREAS A & G ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
More informationSAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
SAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NEAR-TERM TERMINAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS AIRPORT COMMISSION AUGUST 14, 2017 August 14, 2017 AGENDA 1. Forecast Review (with 14 MAP High Case) 2. Gate Requirements and Aircraft
More informationMaster Plan Phase 2 Workshop
Master Plan Phase 2 Workshop Tampa Airport: A Legacy of Innovation and Convenience Tampa Airport: A legacy of Innovation and Convenience The world s first airport people mover Tampa Airport: A legacy of
More informationDallas Love Field Update. Dallas City Council Briefing February 18, 2015
Dallas Love Field Update Dallas City Council Briefing February 18, 2015 Purpose Construction Update Impacts of Wright Amendment Repeal Increase in operations/passengers/ projections Concessions performance
More informationFORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Eagle County Regional Airport (EGE) is known as a gateway into the heart of the Colorado Rocky Mountains, providing access to some of the nation s top ski resort towns (Vail, Beaver
More informationLove Field Modernization Program Update: Master Planning Recommendations
Love Field Modernization Program Update: Master Planning Recommendations Briefing to the Council Transportation and Environment Committee April 28, 2008 1 1 Briefing Objective Discuss the background and
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF TOE MIDFIELD TERMINAL IROJECT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER
PETE FLAHERTY COMMISSIONER TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER STEPHEN A. GEORGE DIRECTOR ROOM M 134, TERMINAL BUILDING GREATER PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PITTSBURGH,
More information14 C.F.R. Part 158. Passenger Facility Charge Program Logan International Airport. Public Notice
14 C.F.R. Part 158 Passenger Facility Charge Program Logan International Airport Public Notice Summary of Proposed 2018 PFC Application PFC Project Descriptions and Justifications PFC Financial Plan Class
More informationFort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 1 2 ATLANTA, GEORGIA Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport Master Plan to Master Plan Implementation Jamie McCluskie Director of Aviation Planning & Environmental Broward County
More informationAIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE PENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 June 20, 2017 Agenda» Introduction» Facility Requirements Airside Terminal Landside General Aviation Cargo
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE OF PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE FOR DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE FOR DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Pursuant to CFR 158.24, the City and County of Denver Department of Aviation ( City ), owner and operator of the Denver International
More informationCHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES
MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Update Metropolitan Airports Commission 4.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES Several alternatives were developed and evaluated based on their capability to meet the
More informationBNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5
A Six Sigma Organization BNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5 September 19, 2012 Introductions MNAA Staff RW Armstrong Team Albersman & Armstrong, Ltd. Atkins North America,
More informationLandside Safety Programs
Landside Safety Programs Ali Ousmane Mahamane AVN 1160- Aviation Safety Spring 2013 The paper is about the landside safety programs. Landside facilities are facilities related to ground access, vehicle
More informationThe CLE Master Plan Includes:
The CLE Master Plan Includes: An inventory of existing conditions Forecasting future demand and analyzing future needs Evaluating alternative development scenarios Preparing the Airport Layout Plan Preparing
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Airport Master Plan Update Manchester-Boston Regional Airport. W:\ _Manchester\MPU\Final\Executive Summary.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Purpose of an... 1 1.2 Goals and Objectives... 1 1.3 Mission Statement... 2 1.4 Stakeholder/Public Involvement... 2 1.5 Major Deliverables...
More informationNOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE Posted March 25, 2019
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE Posted March 25, 2019 The City of Atlanta is providing an opportunity for public comment until April 25, 2019 related to the
More informationTampa International Airport Master Plan Update. December 12, 2012
Tampa International Airport Master Plan Update December 12, 2012 1 Prior Presentation Consolidated rental car and people mover Decongest curbsides and roadways Enable rental car growth Gain long term parking
More informationAirport Preliminary Master Plan Workshop Board of County Commissioners April 18, 2017
Airport Preliminary Master Plan Workshop Board of County Commissioners April 18, 2017 (PRELIMINARY DRAFT) WORK IN PROGRESS - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Agenda (PRELIMINARY DRAFT) WORK IN PROGRESS - FOR
More informationMASTER PLAN UPDATE. Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) FRESNO YOSEMITE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. Meeting #4
MASTER PLAN UPDATE Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) FRESNO YOSEMITE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Meeting #4 December 14, 2017 Today s Agenda o Welcome o Introductions o Progress update o Alternatives analysis
More informationPORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM. COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6a ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting August 23, 2016
PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6a ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting August 23, 2016 DATE: TO: FROM: Michael Ehl, Director, Airport Operations Wayne Grotheer, Director, Aviation Project
More informationNotice and Opportunity to Comment on New Proposed Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) New Application
July 3, 2018 Notice and Opportunity to Comment on New Proposed Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) New Application The City of Kansas City (City), Missouri through its Aviation Department ( the Department
More informationSavannah / Hilton Head International Airport Master Plan Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Savannah / Hilton Head International Airport Master Plan Update Prepared for: The Savannah Airport Commission Prepared by: URS Corporation In Association With: RS&H and Ruth and Associates,
More informationGREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY
GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY Amendment to PFC Applications #7, 8, and 16 and New PFC Application #18 PUBLIC NOTICE June 7, 2016 1 P age Table of Contents PUBLIC NOTICE... 3 PROPOSED ACTIONS... 3
More informationNorfolk International Airport
Norfolk International Airport Master Plan Update Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1 Community Advisory Committee Meeting #1 January 24, 2018 Agenda Project Background Introductions Overview of Airport
More informationFLL Master Plan Update Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) Briefing #2 July 10, 2017
FLL Master Plan Update Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) Briefing #2 July 10, 2017 (PRELIMINARY DRAFT) WORK IN PROGRESS - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY PAC Committee (PRELIMINARY DRAFT) WORK IN PROGRESS -
More informationThe demand/capacity analysis was performed utilizing Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) publications, including the following:
Chapter Three To properly plan for the future of Monterey Regional Airport, it is necessary to examine the capacities of the key airport systems. This chapter uses the results of the forecasts prepared
More informationExisting Conditions AIRPORT PROFILE Passenger Terminal Complex 57 air carrier gates 11,500 structured parking stalls Airfield Operations Area 9,000 North Runway 9L-27R 6,905 Crosswind Runway 13-31 5,276
More informationBirmingham Airport 2033
Over the next 15 years, we will expand and improve the Airport to maximise our potential as a single runway airport by investing 500 million in new development. Our plans take account of our forecasted
More informationSTUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 4. July 12, 2017
STUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 4 July 12, 2017 Agenda Welcome and introductions Update of project schedule Brief overview of previous SWG meeting Introduction to airport development alternatives Comments,
More informationRegional Jets ,360 A319/ , , , ,780
Excel Tab Name: Seats (18 MAP) PASSENGER AIRLINE FLIGHT SCHEDULE CALCULATION RECORD Summary 17.2 MAP flight schedule* (with Southwest Airlines B737-800s changed to B737-700s) Number of Total Seats Avg.
More informationFort Wayne International Airport Master Plan Study. Executive Summary
Fort Wayne International Airport Master Plan Study Executive Summary March 2012 Introduction Airport Background Forecast of Aviation Activity Development Plans Recommended Airfield & Access Development
More informationmsp macnoise.com MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) November 17, 2010
MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) November 17, 2010 Operations Update Technical Advisor s Report Summary MSP Complaints September October 2010 3,025 3,567 2009 6,350 6,001 Total Operations September
More informationIRREGULAR OPERATIONS AIRPORT CONTINGENCY PLAN
IRREGULAR OPERATIONS AIRPORT CONTINGENCY PLAN.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS SAN Appendix 1 - DOT Required Contingency Plan Appendix 2 CBP Sterile Area Procedures.doc 1.0 Purpose 1.1. The purpose of the is to provide
More informationFUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING. ACRP New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities
FUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING ACRP 07-01 New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities In association with: Ricondo & Associates, TransSolutions, TranSecure RESEARCH Background Research Objective
More informationBNA Master Plan Update Public Meeting No. 2
A Six Sigma Organization BNA Master Plan Update Public Meeting No. 2 September 18, 2012 Agenda BNA Master Plan Update Consultants Status of the BNA Master Plan Update Workstation Boards Forecasts of Aviation
More information1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 10 Project Background 1-1 11 Mission Statement and Goals 1-1 12 Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan 1-2 CHAPTER 2 INVENTORY 20 Airport Background 2-1 201
More informationAlternatives. Introduction. Range of Alternatives
Alternatives Introduction Federal environmental regulations concerning the environmental review process require that all reasonable alternatives, which might accomplish the objectives of a proposed project,
More informationKansas City Aviation Department. Update to Airport Committee Customer Service
Kansas City Aviation Department Update to Airport Committee Customer Service 1 Perspective An estimated 800,000 people participated in the Royals Word Series Parade On average 883,000 airline passengers
More informationWelcome to the Boise Airport Master Plan Update Open House
Welcome to the Boise Airport Master Plan Update Open House Get the facts and sign up for the Master Plan Update newsletter at http://www.iflyboise.com/about-boi/master-plan/ What does the Master Plan Update
More informationCity of Kansas City AIRPORT COMMITTEE BRIEFING. Major Renovation Evaluation for Kansas City International Airport.
City of Kansas City AIRPORT COMMITTEE BRIEFING Major Renovation Evaluation for Kansas City International Airport February 2, 2016 1 Agenda Briefly review Exhibit K Process to establish Program Requirements
More informationPITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM
PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS September 2017 Master Plan Update: 1. What is a Master Plan Update? The objective of a Master Plan Update (MPU)
More informationGerald R. Ford International Airport Authority Master Plan Update A World Class Gateway
Gerald R. Ford International Airport Authority Master Plan Update A World Class Gateway Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC) Alternatives September 28, 2017 AGENDA Review of Previous Work Ultimate Land
More informationJOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012
1. Introduction The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends that airport master plans be updated every 5 years or as necessary to keep them current. The Master Plan for Joslin Field, Magic Valley
More informationEXHIBIT E to Signatory Airline Agreement for Palm Beach International Airport RATE AND FEE SCHEDULE
EXHIBIT E to Signatory Airline Agreement for Palm Beach International Airport RATE AND FEE SCHEDULE SECTION I - DEFINITIONS The following words, terms and phrases used in this Exhibit E shall have the
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMENT PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE NEW PFC APPLICATION #11 JUNE 28, 2017
PUBLIC NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMENT PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE NEW PFC APPLICATION #11 JUNE 28, 2017 Agenda Overview of PFC Program at Spokane Airport (GEG) Proposed New PFC 11 Application Project
More informationPublic Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Los Angeles World Airports Passenger Facility Charge Application at Los Angeles International Airport
Re: Public Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Los Angeles World Airports Passenger Facility Charge Application at Los Angeles International Airport Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) intends to submit
More informationFLL Master Plan Update BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BRIEFING
(PRELIMINARY DRAFT) WORK IN PROGRESS - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY FLL Master Plan Update BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BRIEFING May 15, 2018 Master Plan Schedule Overview Progress Since Last Master Plan
More informationRESIDENT ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & QA/QC SERVICES (CONTINUOUS CONTRACTS FROM
The Robert B. Balter Company (Balter) has an extensive and continuously active involvement with the expansion of Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport
More informationPurpose and Need for the Proposed Project
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Project Introduction Snohomish County Airport/Paine Field (PAE) is located in Snohomish County, Washington, approximately 20 miles north of Seattle. Figure A1 depicts
More informationDRAFT. Airport Master Plan Update Sensitivity Analysis
Dallas Love Field Sensitivity Analysis PREPARED FOR: The City of Dallas Department of Aviation PREPARED BY: RICONDO & ASSOCIATES, INC. August 201 Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (R&A) prepared this document
More informationChapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL
Chapter Seven COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING A. GENERAL This chapter delineates the recommended 2005 2024 Sussex County Airport Capital Improvement Program (CIP). It further identifies probable construction
More informationSTUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
INTRODUCTION An Airport Master Plan provides an evalua on of the airport s avia on demand and an overview of the systema c airport development that will best meet those demands. The Master Plan establishes
More informationChapter 8.0 Implementation Plan
Chapter 8.0 Implementation Plan 8.1 Introduction This chapter is the culmination of the analytical work accomplished in the previous chapters. The result is a prioritized list of the essential projects.
More informationAppendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis
Appendix B ULTIMATE AIRPORT CAPACITY & DELAY SIMULATION MODELING ANALYSIS B TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBITS TABLES B.1 Introduction... 1 B.2 Simulation Modeling Assumption and Methodology... 4 B.2.1 Runway
More informationTechnical Advisory Committee Briefing #3
(PRELIMINARY DRAFT) WORK IN PROGRESS - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Technical Advisory Committee Briefing #3 June 22, 2018 Master Plan Schedule Overview Coordination Review Recommended Remote 5-Gate Facility
More informationChapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis
Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis Chapter 1 accumulated the baseline of existing airport data, Chapter 2 presented the outlook for the future in terms of operational activity, Chapter 3 defined the facilities
More informationWestover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update
Westover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update June 2008 INTRODUCTION Westover Metropolitan Airport (CEF) comprises the civilian portion of a joint-use facility located in Chicopee, Massachusetts. The
More informationAppendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS
Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS Airport Master Plan Santa Barbara Airport As part of this Airport Master Plan, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires the development
More informationChapter 1: Introduction Draft
Chapter 1: Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS 1... 4 1.6.1 Stakeholder Engagement Plan... 10 Chapter 1 Page 2 TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1.1-1 ABIA Annual Growth Since 1993... 5 Exhibit 1.4-1: ABIA Location Map...
More informationAddendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)
Bowers Field Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6) This addendum to the Airport Development Alternatives chapter includes the preferred airside development alternative and the preliminary
More informationState of Hawaii Dept. of Transportation Airports Division Capital Improvement Program Update
State of Hawaii Dept. of Transportation Airports Division Capital Improvement Program Update Enabling Inter-Island Improvements for Mauka CC Honolulu International Airport Before After Mauka Concourse
More informationBrief Recap of Project to Date
CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA Rocky Gutierrez Airport (SIT) Terminal Improvements Project Brief Recap of Project to Date Schematic Design: Design Development Meetings June 26 & 27, 2018 Project Description
More informationCHAPTER 5: Landside Facility Requirements and Development Concepts
CHAPTER 5: Landside Facility Requirements and Development Concepts Overview Implementation of the preferred intermediate-term (10-year) and long-term (20-year) airside alternatives will have a significant
More informationCHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION William R. Fairchild International Airport (CLM) is located approximately three miles west of the city of Port Angeles, Washington. The airport
More informationReport to the Strategic Development Committee. Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Project Journey. June 2018
Report to the Strategic Development Committee Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Project Journey June 2018 Secure National Hall Secure National Hall Project Cost Summary Prior Month Expenditures
More informationChapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 1: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1... 4 1.1 Master Plan Study Content... 4 1.2 Purpose and Scope of Master Plan Study... 4 1.3 Airport History and Role... 6 1.4 Airport Location and Service Area... 6 1.5 ABIA
More informationNORTHERN ROCKIES REGIONAL AIRPORT Terminal Expansion ANALYSIS 31 st August 2012
NORTHERN ROCKIES REGIONAL AIRPORT Terminal Expansion ANALYSIS 31 st August 2012 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to analysis the current schedule of operations and assumptions within the 2010
More informationCatExes vs. EAs When and How to Prepare
CatExes vs. EAs When and How to Prepare Panel: Steve Culberson, Ricondo & Associates Frank Smigelski, FAA Mary Vigilante, Synergy Tuesday December 10, 2013 Washington, DC 1 So you have a project Do I have
More informationWhat is an Airport Master Plan?
What is an Airport Master Plan? The goal of a master plan is to provide the framework needed to guide future airport development that will cost-effectively satisfy aviation demand, while considering potential
More informationGSP TERMINAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRESS KIT
About GSP MISSION STATEMENT At Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport (GSP), we begin each day fully committed to finding new ways to achieve our mission to provide the citizens of Upstate South
More informationFor Airport Environmental Services. Date Released: August 27, 2018 Deadline for Submission: 5:00pm, September 17, 2018
COUNTY OF INYO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS For Airport Environmental Services Date Released: August 27, 2018 Deadline for Submission: 5:00pm, September 17, 2018 County of Inyo Public Works Department P.O.
More informationExecutive Summary DRAFT
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 6 2. Aviation Forecasts... 7 3. Demand/Capacity and Facility Requirements... 10 4. Terminal Demand/Capacity Analysis... 14 5. Landside Development Needs... 17 6. Support
More informationMeeting Summary ABE Master Plan Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting #3 August 15, Shannon Eibert, C&S Companies
Meeting Summary ABE Master Plan Project Advisory Group (PAG) Meeting #3 August 15, 2017 Prepared by: File: Attendees: Shannon Eibert, C&S Companies N93.012.001 See Sign-In List A third meeting was held
More informationAppendix 6.1: Hazard Worksheet
Appendix 6.1: Appendix 6.1: Ref. Condition, real or potential; that can cause injury, illness, etc. This is a prerequisite for an Airfield Hazards 1. Taxiway Geometry Direct access to runway from ramp
More informationNewark Liberty International Airport. Terminal One Redevelopment. Briefing Book.
Newark Liberty International Airport Terminal One Redevelopment Briefing Book www.ewrredevelopment.com Briefing Book Renderings by GRIMSHAW 3Q 2018 The information contained in this Program Briefing Book
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE. Table 1 Projects Proposed by Amendment
PUBLIC NOTICE The Dallas Department of Aviation (the Department) intends to file an amendment application to increase the PFC amount of one previously approved project at Dallas Love Field Airport (the
More informationNotice of Intent to File an Application to Impose and Use a Passenger Facility Charge at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport
Notice of Intent to File an Application to Impose and Use a Passenger Facility Charge at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 158.24(a) (1) (III), the Broward County
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. General Study Objectives Public Involvement Issues to Be Resolved
TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Number LIST OF ACRONYMS... a CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION General... 1-1 Study Objectives... 1-1 Public Involvement... 1-2 Issues to Be Resolved... 1-2 CHAPTER TWO EXISTING
More informationGreater Orlando Aviation Authority
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando International Airport & Orlando Executive Airport Budgets Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando, Florida Greater Orlando Aviation Authority
More informationPunta Gorda Airport Master Plan Update
Punta Gorda Airport Master Plan Update Draft Executive Summary Prepared for: The Charlotte County Airport Authority January 2018 Charlotte County Airport Authority James Herston, Chair Robert D. Hancik,
More informationRECOMMENDED 2013 BUDGET
RECOMMENDED 2013 BUDGET December 12, 2012 Budget Highlights Draft October 17, 2012 Aviation Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Expenses 1.5 percent overall O&M increase (including debt service) 2013 Salary
More informationExecutive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport
Executive Summary MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport As a general aviation and commercial service airport, Fort Collins- Loveland Municipal Airport serves as an important niche
More informationLand Use Policy Considerations
Land Use Policy Considerations Challenges to Implementing Successful Land Use Strategies at Airports ACRP Insight Event: Washington DC Stephen D. Van Beek, Ph.D. April 11, 2018 Land Use Policy Considerations
More informationRegular Board Meeting August 4, 2015
Regular Board Meeting August 4, 2015 1616 Airport Circle Hailey, ID 83333 208.788.4956 PUBLIC COMMENT FY 16 Rates & Charges FY 16 Budget Approval Rates & Charges will provide the Board the ability to operate
More information2012 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 2016 ADDENDUM VOLUME 1 SUBMITTED ON: SEPTEMBER 22, 2017
VOLUME 1 2012 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 2016 ADDENDUM SUBMITTED ON: SEPTEMBER 22, 2017 VOLUME 1 CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRO AND AIRPORT CONTEXT SECTION 2 - FORECAST SECTION 3 - AIRFIELD FACILITIES AND DEMAND/CAPACITY
More informationCLASS SPECIFICATION 5/12/11 SENIOR AIRPORT ENGINEER, CODE 7257
Form PDES 8 THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CLASS SPECIFICATION 5/12/11 SENIOR AIRPORT ENGINEER, CODE 7257 Summary of Duties: A Senior Airport Engineer performs the more difficult and
More informationA. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS
Chapter 11: Traffic and Parking A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS The FGEIS found that the Approved Plan will generate a substantial volume of vehicular and pedestrian activity, including an estimated 1,300
More informationHuntsville International Airport Master Plan Update
Huntsville International Airport Master Plan Update June 28, 2017 Agenda Welcome and introductions Master planning process Inventory of existing conditions Forecasts of aviation demand Facility requirements
More informationAirport Master Plan. Brookings Regional Airport. Runway Runway 17-35
Runway 17-35 Airport Master Plan Runway 12-30 Brookings Regional Airport Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1: Master Plan Goals... 1-1 1.1. Introduction... 1 1.2. Objective 1 Identify improvements
More informationDALLAS LOVE FIELD MAY 2015 DRAFT
8. Funding Plan This section presents a potential funding plan for implementing the CIP projects recommended in the Master Plan Update, along with an assessment of the ability of the Airport sponsor (i.e.,
More informationAIRPORTS DIVISION. The Hawaii Airports System Is Self-Supporting
AIRPORTS DIVISION Department of Transportation AIRPORTS DIVISION The Hawaii Airports System Is Self-Supporting The State of Hawaii s General Fund (tax revenues) does not fund the operation of the Airports
More informationAgenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3
Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3 Date: 04/12/18 Public Involvement Plan Update Defining the System Recommended Classifications Discussion Break Review current system Outreach what we heard Proposed changes Classification
More informationKansas City Aviation Department. Community Listening Session
Kansas City Aviation Department Community Listening Session Listening Session Purpose The Kansas City Aviation Department is moderating these community listening sessions in order to gather feedback from
More informationCOUNTY OF MUSKEGON MUSKEGON COUNTY AIRPORT Rates, Charges and Fee for FY18 October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018
COUNTY OF MUSKEGON MUSKEGON COUNTY AIRPORT Rates, Charges and Fee for FY18 October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018 GROUND & FACILITY LEASE RATES Ground Lease Rate Bare ground for development Per Individual
More informationSCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES
SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES Effective: October 1, 2014 Revised: April 1, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Airlines 4 Passenger Facility Charge 5 Badges and Security 6 Cargo 6 Concessions 7 FBO/SASO 7 Fuel
More information