Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Scoping Document

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Scoping Document"

Transcription

1 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region November 2009 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Cumberland Ranger District, Daniel Boone National Forest Bath, Rowan and Menifee Counties, Kentucky For Information Contact: Patty Beyer USDA Forest Service 115 South Lakeshore Drive, Suite E Marquette, MI (906) Or Tim Eling USDA Forest Service Daniel Boone National Forest 3451 Sky Bridge Road Stanton, KY (606) ext 101

2 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Where is this project in the Forest Service project planning process? The Forest Service decision-making process provides opportunities for interested parties to give their ideas and opinions about resource management proposals. This input is important in helping the Forest Service to identify resource needs, which will shape the alternatives evaluated and lead to the formation of a decision. The following explains the basic steps used in the project planning process, and where the attached proposal is in that process. Step One Need for a project. The Forest Service or some other entity may identify the need for a project. YOU may bring the need for a project to the attention of the Forest Service. Step Two Develop project proposal. The Forest Service or a project proponent develops detailed, site-specific proposal. YOU may be proponent who develops proposal or YOU can share input and ideas. Step Three Scoping (public input). The Forest Service solicits public input on the site-specific proposal to define the scope of environmental analysis and range of alternatives to be considered. YOU provide site-specific input on the proposal including recommendations to protect the environment and improve the activities proposed. Step Four Identify significant issues and develop range of reasonable alternatives. The interdisciplinary team evaluates YOUR comments received from scoping and the responsible official approves significant issues and alternatives to receive detailed consideration. Step Five Information for formal public comment period. Forest Service performs preliminary analysis of environmental effects and solicits formal public comment for a 30-day comment period. YOU provide timely comments on the analysis during the comment period. Step Six Environmental Analysis (EA) & Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Decision. Forest Service documents the environmental analysis in an EA and the responsible officials issue a FONSI on an alternative course of action. The Forest Service will issue a Decision Notice on the selected alternative. Step Seven Appeal (36 CFR 215). The Forest Service allows the public 45 days following a legal notice of decision to file an appeal. YOU can review the Forest Service decision; and you have an opportunity to appeal it if you disagree, and you have standing. Step Eight Implementation. Five days after the close of the appeal period (if no appeals are made), the Forest Service implements the project. Step Nine Monitor and Evaluate. The Forest Service monitors project implementation. YOU provide feedback on the project to the Forest Service. 2

3 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Table of Contents Project Background... 3 Purpose of and Need for the Project... 3 Proposed Action... 4 Potential Issues... 7 Forest Plan Compliance and Design Criteria... 7 References Responsible Officials How you can participate List of Tables Table 1. Summary of proposed designated trail use mileage in the Cave Run Project Area... 5 Table 2. Cave Run Proposed Action Goals, Objectives and Standards... 8 Table 3. Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Proposed Trail Designations List of Maps Figure 1. Project area vicinity map... 2 Figure 2. Proposed Trail Designation Map - Attached 1

4 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Figure 1. Project area vicinity map 2

5 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Cave Run Non- Motorized Trails Initiative Cumberland Ranger District Daniel Boone National Forest Project Background The area included in the Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative is on the Cumberland Ranger District around Cave Run Lake (Figure 1). The project area includes 52,500 acres of national forest land. There are approximately 75 miles of existing Forest Service maintained trails in the area. These miles include approximately 25 miles of the Sheltowee Trace National Recreation Trail, which crosses through the area but extends north, nearly to Ohio, and south to Pickett State Park in Tennessee. Daniel Boone National Forest trails were hand constructed in the 1960s and 1970s primarily as hiking trails. Some trails, like the Caney Loop, were built with equipment and some are on forest Service roads in the Pioneer Weapons area and near the campgrounds. Most of these trails do not meet today s surface, width or grade guidelines for equestrian or bicycling use. In addition, the trails do not meet design guidance for effective water management. The Forest met with interested groups and individuals in January 2008 to discuss what they liked and didn t like about the Cave Run Lake trail system. These meetings also offered an opportunity to discuss concerns regarding resource impacts and user conflicts. Throughout 2008, the Forest continued to work with a smaller subset of users to develop a proposed action that would address the issues and ideas discussed. Many ideas were taken into consideration when developing this proposal. The Cumberland Ranger District envisions a well-managed trail system that considers the needs of all user groups. This system is in balance with environmental resource needs, where users enjoy the wildlife and scenery. User groups would be engaged to work collaboratively with the Forest Service to further develop and maintain the trail system into a premier multi-use trail network through combination of volunteer efforts, challenge cost-share agreements and ongoing stewardship. The trails would be sustainable and stable, created on the contour of the land. Users would enjoy destinations such as ridge views, shoreline opportunities, geological and historical features. Purpose of and Need for the Project The original trail system in the vicinity of Cave Run Lake was not designed according to current standards, and many have steep grades or are located in riparian areas. Originally the trail system was built for light hiking use. Trails were not designed to sustain use by horses or mountain bikes. In the last decade, equestrian and mountain bike use of the area has grown dramatically. The Cave Run area is a unique destination spot for these enthusiasts, offering miles of beautiful and challenging trails. Unfortunately, over time users have created a myriad of confusing and unmaintained paths not approved or maintained by the Forest Service. In addition, the combination of soil types and seasonal heavy rains make the system trails a challenge to 3

6 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative maintain for high-impact uses and, in many places, create known or potential degradation to soil and water resources caused by user-developed trails. Trails are degrading due to usage beyond their design and/or carrying capacities and are becoming wider, deeper, muddy, erosive and rutted, which jeopardizes their sustainability. Some conflicts between user groups have occurred in the past. As a result of the cooperative user group meetings held in the summer of 2008, the Forest had been asked to consider as a management option, separating uses on the trails when possible to increase the level of user satisfaction and experience. The purpose and need of the Cave Run Project Non-Motorized Trails Initiative is to: Provide a sustainable non-motorized trail system commensurate with public demand along with natural resource and Agency capabilities. Reduce the risk of further trail degradation by bringing non-motorized trails up to standard. Provide an enjoyable non-motorized user experience through proper trail use designation and management. Create trail loops of different lengths along with appropriately developed trail head parking or privately provided parking and/or camping accommodations. Reduce impacts to soil, water, cultural and vegetation resources caused by inappropriate off trail user activities. Provide easily understandable information to user groups about trail use and availability, trail etiquette and accommodations. Proposed Action This section includes a description of the component parts of the proposed action. It begins with the general descriptions of trail designation and trail management objectives. This section concludes with a list of specific actions to be taken in the Cave Run Project Area to successfully implement the trail management objectives. Note that the proposal only includes trail segments within the project area boundary and does not include other sections of the Sheltowee Trace other non-motorized trail segments, or the White Sulphur OHV Trail. Trail Designation The Forest Service would designate hiking, mountain biking and equestrian (non-motorized) trails on the Cumberland Ranger District to enhance user experience and to improve and maintain appropriate trail tread surface based on designated trail use. Refer to Figure 2, the attached 11 by 17 inch map, for locations. Proposed trail designation includes: 25.1 miles of Sheltowee Trace National Scenic and Recreation Trail 49.0 of miles existing system trails, 7.2 miles of user-developed routes into the trail system, and 1.7 miles of special use permit trails to link equestrian concessionaires to the designated trail system. 4

7 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative In addition, 19.8 miles of road segments would be available to create equestrian trail loops. Incorporating roads into the trail system does not include changing the road designation within the travel management system for motorized use. It is meant only to convey the importance of the current road system in connecting non-motorized trail segments. Table 1 summarizes the mileages by designated use. Table 3 (attached as an appendix) lists each trail segment separately and provides details about the trail segment, including length, trail width and expected seasonal limitations. Table 1. Summary of proposed designated trail use mileage in the Cave Run Project Area Designated Use *Numbers are in Miles* Sheltowee Trace Existing Trail System User Developed routes Special Use Trails Total Trail Miles by Designated Use All Uses Horse / Hike * Bike / Hike Hike Only Total Miles *In addition, 19.8 miles of road segments would be available to create trail loops for several equestrian trail segments, as shown in Table 3. Trail Management Objectives 1) Create quality opportunities for all trail user groups and collaborate with user groups to upgrade and expand trail system. By conducting workshops to increase local and regional volunteer efforts, the Forest could explore hybrid contracting and cost-share agreements to maximize trail maintenance. 2) Because the Forest recognizes that trails cannot withstand year-round use due to seasonal weather conditions, the Forest will assign the appropriate season of use to avoid erosion and deterioration of native surface trails. To ensure for safe trail conditions, maintenance needs such as brushing or repairing trail tread drainage will be established. Future needs including trail relocation, hardening, improving drainage crossings will also be reviewed as needed annually. 3) Increasing the availability of looped trails in various lengths to provide for short (1 to 3 hours) and all day rides near main horse trailheads such as White Sulphur Horse camp. 4) Relocating valley bottom trails and trails located along old native surface roads to nearby side slopes, with emphasis on the upper third of drainage bottoms will greatly enhance trail stability and reduce drainage issues. 5) Ridge trails should be related to the slope break to allow adequate drainage. Current ridge trails focus drainage on the trail and then collect fine sediment in the swales on the ridges. Moving trails to the sides would eliminate this problem. 6) It is assumed under the Proposed Action that upgrades, changes to trail use, signing, trail relocations, etc. would be completed over several years after the decision is signed and be directly dependent upon funding and availability of personnel. General time frames and actions are given below to highlight a proposed implementation schedule. This list is subject to change based on funding and staffing constraints. Priority 1: 5

8 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Trail condition and surface characterization such as tread width and surface. Trail relocations and road to trail conversions in drainage bottoms. Improve signage to facilitate recreation use Begin offering workshops to educate trail volunteers on appropriate maintenance and construction for target user group. Priority 2: Complete needed and prescribed work to the current trail system to expand season of use. Continue to add new proposed user-developed trails or construct new segments as proposed to the system. Engage the City of Morehead or Morehead State University to partner with the Forest Service to provide access to the Sheltowee Trace. Establish a trail condition monitoring system to provide information for future management decisions and to measure the effectiveness of the proposed management actions. Continue bringing trails up to standard to complete the system through signing, trail surface upgrades and relocations as necessary. Work with volunteers to develop trail names, signage and maps for the designed trail system Priority 3: Continue bringing trails up to standard to complete the system through signing, trail surface upgrades and relocations as necessary. Work with volunteers to develop trail names, signage and maps for the designed trail system Specific Proposed Activities (See attached maps and table) 1. Designate non-motorized trail segments or loops for a specific use or combination of uses. Designation of non-motorized trails includes construction of new trails, connector trails, use changes from previous designation and inclusion of user-developed trails into the designated trail system. Designated trails will be signed. 2. Implement specific trail maintenance objectives as described above, including bringing trails up to standards commensurate with the designated use. 3. Eliminate user-developed routes that are not incorporated into the designated trail system. 4. Relocate non-motorized trail segments to reduce drainage problems along trails and reduce impacts from users. Favor south tending slopes since these aspects are drier, albeit rockier. Reroute trails away from unstable slump zones along footslopes. Two areas were identified that have unstable soils with high propensity for holding moisture: (1) South route of Sheltowee near intersection with TR 115, and (2) the west bound connector of Sheltowee at Clear Creek bridge. 5. Build an equestrian trailhead parking facility on FR 930, north of Hwy 1274 to serve the proposed Murder Branch equestrian trail system. 6. Redesign the Glady Trailhead parking area to accommodate day-use by horse trailers and other visitors. 7. Install a kiosk, tie-ups and benches at the intersection of Trails 112, 106, 107 (also known as 5-Corners). 6

9 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative 8. Establish seasons of use for trails based upon tread conditions, soils and trails locations to provide a more sustainable trail tread and enhance user experience (see Table 3). 9. Develop a trail map, brochure and signage to effectively convey information to the public on trail use opportunities and regulations. 10. Issue a Forest Supervisor s Order that allows law enforcement to issue citations to those that do not comply with trail designations. 11. Issue new special use authorities to local livery stables to permit their use of National Forest system trails. Potential Issues The potential issues discussed by the interdisciplinary team during the planning stages of the Cave Run Project include, but are not limited to, degraded conditions on many trails, conflicts between multiple uses on the trails, changed access routes for non-motorized use, closure of user-developed trails, and restrictions on cross-country travel. Forest Plan Compliance and Design Criteria The Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) for the Daniel Boone National Forest recognizes the importance of a quality recreational experience on National Forest System lands. Types of recreation uses have changed, with faster growth in horseback riding and off-highway vehicle use but slower increases in hiking and backpacking, for example (Forest Plan p. 1-6). The Forest Plan states The Daniel Boone National Forest provides a variety of dispersed and developed recreational opportunities to five million visitors each year. Growth in demand for recreational opportunities is likely to continue and new types of recreation may be introduced. While recreational activities can adversely affect Forest resources in various ways, differing recreational activities may create user conflicts or compete for the same resources. The Forest Plan revision should develop an appropriate mix of recreational opportunities that responds to increasing demands and also provides adequate ecosystem protection (Forest Plan p. 1-9). The Forest Plan describes the desired future condition, in the short-term, as providing opportunities for non-motorized trail use in undeveloped areas that protects the ecosystem and heritage resources (Forest Plan p. 2-3 and Goal 12.2, p. 2-17). In the long-term, an adequate infrastructure of trails supports the Forest s desired future conditions such as maintaining or improving ecological functions of flood plains, ground water, lakes, riparian areas, springs, streams, and wetlands (Forest Plan p. 2-4 and Goal 12, p. 2-16). The project area is within the Licking River management area and prescription areas: Habitat diversity, ruffed grouse habitat, large reservoir, cliffline communities, riparian corridor, rare communities, source water protection and old growth as delineated by the 2004 Daniel Boone National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. Design criteria (Forest Plan standards) are implemented to protect resources during the implementation of proposed activities. Table 2 displays the design criteria applied to the Cave Run Trails Initiative proposed action. Trail standards are defined by national and regional policy and can be found at: 7

10 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative 0Trail%20Class%203.pdf It is assumed all national regulation and policy regarding trail width, surface and type of use will be followed during the implementation process. Table 2. Cave Run Proposed Action Goals, Objectives and Standards Goals and Objectives Forest Plan Reference GOAL 7 Provide a sustainable mix of desired uses, valued characteristics, and services to improve the long-term benefit to local communities and the public GOAL 7.3 Provide additional rock climbing, equestrian, and OHV trail riding opportunities GOAL 12 Provide a road and trail network, buildings and other facilities that support the Forest s Desired Future Conditions Objective 12.0.A. Reconstruct, relocate, close and stabilize, or obliterate roads and trails that do not meet their management Objective GOAL 12.1 Minimize road or trail sediment that reaches streams Objective 12.1.B. Bring 20 percent of existing system trails into compliance with erosion control standards (Best Management Practices) each year; consider relocating, reconstructing, or closing 2-17 trails that cannot be maintained to standard. Give priority to those affecting riparian/aquatic areas. Objective 12.1.C. Annually, inventory 20 percent of user-developed trails in conjunction with annual integrated inventories. Close and/or rehabilitate trails causing resource damage. Give priority to those within riparian/aquatic areas. If appropriate, trails may be added to the Forest s 2-17 trail system. GOAL 12.2 Provide motorized and non-motorized trails to address recreational demand a Forest Plan Design Criteria Standard Reference Recreational activities inside caves will not be promoted except for designated DB REC- 1 recreational caves. Public information concerning location and access to nonrecreational 2-21 caves will be limited. DB-REC-7 Allow no new designated OHV, horse, or bicycle trails within the scoured ephemeral stream zone except at designated crossings or where the trail location requires some encroachment, for example, to accommodate steep terrain DB-VEG-6 Do not permit use of stream channels for skid roads or trails DB-WLF-8 DB-WLF-9 DB-WLF-10 DB-WLF-12 DB-WLF-13 Tree cutting may not be conducted within 2.5 miles of any Indiana bat maternity colony from May 1 through August 15. (See Table 2-1) For non-vegetation management projects, currently suitable Indiana bat roost trees may be felled only from October 15 through March 31, if they are more than five miles from a significant bat caves (Indiana bat). If tree removal occurs at other times, the trees must be evaluated for current Indiana bat use, according to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service protocol. For non-vegetation management projects, removal of currently suitable roost trees (Indiana bat) within five miles of a significant bat cave (Indiana bat) may occur only from November 16 through March 15. If removal occurs at other times, the trees must be evaluated for current Indiana bat use, according to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service protocol. Within five miles of a significant Indiana bat hibernaculum, tree cutting is not to be conducted from September 1 through December 1. Where caves exist outside Cliffline Community Prescription Area a minimum zone of 200 feet is to be maintained around openings to caves and mines suitable for supporting cave-associated species, as well as any associated sinkholes and cave collapse areas, except for designated recreational caves. Prohibited activities within this protective area include use of motorized wheeled or tracked equipment (except on existing roads and trails),

11 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative a Forest Plan Design Criteria Standard Reference mechanical site preparation, recreation site construction, tractor-constructed fire lines for prescribed fire, herbicide application, and construction of new roads, skid trails, or log landings. Vegetation in this buffer zone may be managed only to improve habitat for PETS or Conservation species. Areas will be managed to meet or exceed Recreation Opportunity Spectrum 3.A-REC-1 experiences of semi-primitive non-motorized, semi-primitive motorized, roaded 3-49 natural, and rural. 3.B-REC-3 Areas will be managed to meet or exceed Recreation Opportunity Spectrum experiences of semi-primitive non-motorized, semi-primitive motorized, roaded 3-52 natural, and rural. 1.C-REC-1 New recreation facilities [trails] will not be permitted in the cliffline zone if they are determined to negatively impact heritage resources listed or potentially 3-7 eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 1.C-WLF-2 Management activities [trails] will not concentrate public use in the vicinity of clilfflines, if such is detrimental to PETS species or habitat for Conservation 3-8 species. 1.E-REC-1 No new trails for off-highway vehicles, bicycles, horses, and other nonpedestrian modes of transportation are to be constructed within the [1.E] area (Riparian Corridor), except to approach and cross at designated sites, or 3-15 where the trail location requires some encroachment (e.g. to accommodate steep slopes) 1.E-REC-2 In riparian corridor, do not allow overnight tethering or corralling of horses or other livestock within 100 feet of stream courses or 300 feet of other water bodies. Maintain exiting corral sites to limit impacts to water quality and 3-15 riparian corridors. 1.E-REC-3 Any trail construction (in Riparian Corridor) must be accomplished in accordance with relevant state Best Management Practices12 or Forest Service regional/national direction for erosion control (e.g., USFS Region Trails South13). 1.E-REC-6 New non-motorized trail construction (in Riparian Corridor) is allowed to improve existing trail configuration and improve access to streams, lakes and 3-15 the riparian corridor. 1.E-REC-7 Motorized and non-motorized trail reconstruction and relocation within riparian corridor are allowed to reduce impacts to riparian and aquatic resources G-ENG-WET- 1 New roads, trails, and temporary landings are permitted in rare community management zones (Forest Plan Figure 3-2) as long as surface water runoff from roads, ruts, trails, and landings is not concentrated into streams within the defined watershed, but rather dispersed across a wide area. 1.G-REC-2 Build no new trails in Rare Community sites G-REC-3 Do not concentrate public use in Rare Community sites K-REC-1 5.C-REC-2 National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines Habitat Diversity Areas will be managed to meet or exceed Recreation Opportunity Spectrum experiences of semi-primitive non-motorized, semiprimitive motorized, roaded natural, and rural. Water Source Protection Areas will be managed to meet or exceed Recreation Opportunity Spectrum experiences of semi-primitive non-motorized, semiprimitive motorized, roaded natural, and rural. Recreational activities or trail maintenance activities will not occur within 330 feet of active eagle nests during the breeding season. a - Standard - Requirement found in a Forest Plan, which govern actions taken to meet objectives. Standards often preclude or impose limitations on management activities or resource uses, generally for environmental protection or public safety. Standards are mandatory, and deviation from a standard requires a Forest Plan amendment N/A 9

12 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative References USDA Forest Service. April Land and Resource Management Plan for the Daniel Boone National Forest. Management Bulletin R8-MB 117A. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region, Daniel Boone National Forest. Winchester, KY. Responsible Officials The Forest Service Deciding Official is the Daniel Boone National Forest Supervisor, Frank Beum. The Forest Supervisor must determine: The locations of non-motorized trail segment designation by type of use. The locations of non-motorized trailheads. Whether to implement the trail management objectives and associated specific trail actions (as listed above) Whether to issue a Forest Supervisor s Order that allows law enforcement to issue citations to those that do not comply with trail designations. Whether to issue new special use authorities to local livery stables to permit their use of National Forest system trails. If any mitigation or design criteria are needed for the protection of the land. Whether the action is consistent with the Forest Plan Whether to issue a Finding of No Significant Impact or prepare an EIS. How you can participate I would like you to take time to review the information provided above and provide your comments on the project. Comments most useful to the interdisciplinary team that will be conducting the analysis, and also to the decision maker, are those that are site specific and tied closely to the proposed action. Comments will be used to define issues with the Proposed Action, to develop alternatives to the Proposed Action, and to analyze effects. Submit comments electronically to the DBNF electronic database at: Comments-southern-daniel-boone-cumberland@fs.fed.us Verbal comments can be given to the Project Coordinator, Patty Beyer, at (906) Hours are 7:30 am to 4:00 pm eastern daylight time. If leaving a message, please leave name and contact information. Written comments can be sent to Ms. Beyer at the following address: USDA Forest Service, 115 South Lakeshore Dr. Suite E, Marquette, MI Please provide any information, data, or issues no later than December 18, Also, direct any questions to Ms. Beyer at (906) or, by at the electronic database address given above. You may also contact Tim Eling at (606) ext 101. The Environmental Assessment is expected to be completed in the summer of 2010 and will be available on the forest web site or by request. 10

13

14 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Table 3. Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Proposed Trail Designations. Existing Designations Trail Percent (%) segment Miles Current Dominant Trail Track Type / identifier Trail Name based Type Track Type See Map on GIS (see previous column) Sheltowee Trace Segments within Project Area Sheltowee US 60 to Big 100-A Limestone Trail Sheltowee Big 100-B Limestone Trail to Stoney Cove Sheltowee Stoney Cove 100-C to Trail 113 Sheltowee Trail 113 to 100-D Rd. 129 (Clear Creek Lake) Sheltowee Road E (Clear Creek Lake) to Trail 906A Sheltowee - Trail 906A to 100-F Road 906 Sheltowee Road 906 to 100-G Road 908 Sheltowee Road 908 to 100-H KY 1274 Total Sheltowee Trace trail length in project area Big Limestone Trail 109 Sheltowee to Road 964 Lakeview Ridge Trail 122 Sheltowee to Shallow Flats viewing area Caney Trail Stony Cove 1226 to Sheltowee White Sulfur Trail and 115 Loop Trail 115A to Trail Sheltowee 100-D White Sulfur connector 115-A Trail 115 to Sheltowee 100-C Buckskin Sheltowee to 113-A Trail 108 Use 1.7 Single Track / Double Track 30/70 Bike / Hike None 4.5 Single Track / Double Track 30/70 Bike / Hike None 4.9 Single Track / Double Track 30/70 All Proposed Designations Trail Limitations Seasonal closures are weather dependant (does not apply to hiking) Bike closure Dec 1- April 1 Horse closure Dec 1 May Single Track / Double Track 0/100 Horse/Hike Closed Dec 1 May Single Track / Double Track 0/100 All Bike closure Dec 1- April 1 Horse closure Dec 1 May Single Track / Double Track 0/100 Bike / Hike Closed Dec 1 April Single Track / Double Track 0/100 Bike / Hike Closed Dec 1 April Single Track / Double Track 100/0 Bike / Hike Closed Dec 1 April Single Track 100 Bike / Hike Closed Dec 1 April Wide Track 100 Bike / Hike Closed Dec 1 April Single Track 100 Bike / Hike Closed Dec 1 April Wide Track 100 Horse/Hike Closed Dec 1 May Wide Track 100 Horse/Hike Closed Dec 1 May Single Track and Double Track 50/50 All Bike closure Dec 1- April 1 Horse closure Dec 1 May 15 12

15 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Table 3. Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Proposed Trail Designations. Existing Designations Trail Percent (%) segment Miles Current Dominant Trail Track Type / identifier Trail Name based Type Track Type Use See Map on GIS (see previous column) 113-B Buckskin Trail 108 to Buckskin trailhead Buckskin Buckskin 113-C trailhead to Zilpo Recreation Area 112-A Cave Run Trail 113 N to Trail Single Track 100 All 112-B Cave Run - Trail108 to Trail106 Cave Run Trail 108 to 112-C Trail 104 and Tater Knob Tower 108 Connector Trail Trail112 Trail Double Track 100 All 106-A Hog Pen - Trough Lick 1.8 Road and Single Track 85/15 Bike / Hike 106-B 107-A 107-B A 103 (Trail 113) to Trail 112 Hog Pen Trail 112 to Trail 113 Cross Over Trail Trail 106 Road 918 (adjacent to Road 1225) Cross Over Trail Road 918 Trail 118 Tater Knob Trail Tater Knob Tower to Trail 118 Buck Creek - Road 129 to Cave Run shore. Note: trail is located on road, shown adjacent on map. Cave Run Lake (Chestnut Cliffs Trail) - Trail 118 to Trail 116 at Leather wood Road Leatherwood Loop Trail 116 Clear Creek Trail Clear Creek Lake parking lot loop Proposed Designations Trail Limitations Seasonal closures are weather dependant (does not apply to hiking) 3.3 Single Track 100 Bike / Hike Closed Dec 1 April Single Track 100 Bike / Hike Closed Dec 1 April 1 Bike closure Dec 1- April 1 Horse closure Dec 1 May Single Track 100 Bike / Hike Closed Dec 1 April Wide Track 100 Horse/Hike Closed Dec 1 May Single Track and Double Track 10/90 Horse/Hike 1.7 Road 100 All None 1.4 Single Track and Wide Track Bike closure Dec 1- April 1 Horse closure Dec 1 May 15 Bike closure Dec 1- April 1 Horse closure Dec 1 May 15 Bike closure Dec 1- April 1 Horse closure Dec 1 May / 2 Horse/Hike Horse closure Dec 1 May Double Track 100 Horse/Hike None 4.1 Single Track and Wide Track 50/50 Horse/Hike Closed Dec 1 May Wide Track 100 Horse/Hike Closed Dec 1 May Wide Track 100 Horse/Hike Closed Dec 1 May Single Track 100 Hike only Closed Dec 1 April 1 13

16 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Table 3. Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Proposed Trail Designations. Existing Designations Trail Percent (%) segment Miles Current Dominant Trail Track Type / identifier Trail Name based Type Track Type See Map on GIS (see previous column) Roads to be included in trail system to develop trail loops 914 Glady Branch Road 1.6 Road 100 Horse/Hike None Use Proposed Designations Trail Limitations Seasonal closures are weather dependant (does not apply to hiking) Ratliff Road (Shooting Range) Road 129 to 5.3 Road 100 Horse/Hike None Glady connector 1053 Clear Fork Road 909 to user developed trail 0.5 Road 100 Horse/Hike None 906 Glady Hollow Road Road 909 to Road 906A 2.5 Road 100 Horse/Hike None 906A Pergram Sink Road Road 906 to Sheltowee 0.8 Road 100 Horse/Hike None Carrington Branch Road 908 Road 906 to Rudy Ranch 3.0 Road 100 Horse/Hike None Road 912 McDole Branch - Road 906 to terminus 1.3 Road 100 Horse/Hike None Murder Branch Road 1074 Ross Grocery to Road 3.2 Road 100 Horse/Hike None 1074B (Fuget Road) 1074B Fuget Bridge Road Road 1074 to terminus 0.3 Road 100 Horse/Hike None 1062 Caney Road (Road 1062) 1.3 Road 100 Horse/Hike None User developed trails to be Incorporated into designated trail system AA Murder Branch Road 1074b to FS Single Track / Double Track 90/10 Horse/Hike None BB Glady Connector Road 1053 to FS Single Track 100 Horse/Hike None CC Gate Post Road 909 to Glady Connector 0.3 Single Track 100 Horse/Hike None DD Caney Road extension - Road 1062 to Trail100-C 0.4 Double Track / Road 50/50 Horse/Hike Closed Dec 1 May 15 14

17 Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Table 3. Cave Run Non-Motorized Trails Initiative Proposed Trail Designations. Existing Designations Trail Percent (%) segment Miles Current Dominant Trail Track Type / identifier Trail Name based Type Track Type See Map on GIS (see previous column) Special Use Permit trails EE-SUP Jonas Adams 0.7 Single Track 100 Horse/Hike None 121-SUP Rudy s Ranch to Road Wide Track 100 Horse/Hike None 123-SUP Rudy's Ranch to Road Wide Track 100 Horse/Hike None Single Track = Trail < 50 inches, generally 2 ft. Double Track = old road, native surface Use Proposed Designations Trail Limitations Seasonal closures are weather dependant (does not apply to hiking) Road = Current system road with gravel hardening Wide Track = Trail from inches 15

Cave Run Nonmotorized Trails Project

Cave Run Nonmotorized Trails Project United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service August 2012 Cave Run Nonmotorized Trails Project Comment Period Report Cumberland Ranger District, Daniel Boone National Forest Bath, Rowan, and Menifee

More information

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service White Mountain National Forest 33 Kancamagus Highway Conway, NH 03818 Comm: (603) 447-5448 TTY: (603) 447-3121 File Code: 1950 Date: February 26,

More information

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL www.marincountyparks.org Marin County Parks, 3501 Civic Center Dr, Suite 260, San Rafael, CA 94903 DATE: July 12, 2017 PRESERVE: Gary Giacomini Open Space Preserve PROJECT:

More information

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL

RUSHMORE CONNECTOR TRAIL PROPOSAL PURPOSE AND NEED Background The U.S. Forest Service, Black Hills National Forest (Forest Service) has received a special use permit application from the State of South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and

More information

Theme: Predominately natural/natural appearing; rustic improvements to protect resources. Size*: 2,500 + acres Infrastructure**:

Theme: Predominately natural/natural appearing; rustic improvements to protect resources. Size*: 2,500 + acres Infrastructure**: Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) Classes The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) provides a way to describe the variations in the degree of isolation from the sounds and influences of people, and

More information

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture

Proposed Action. Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties. United States Department of Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service January 2012 Proposed Action Payette National Forest Over-Snow Grooming in Valley, Adams and Idaho Counties Payette National Forest Valley, Adams

More information

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District 33 Kancamagus Highway Conway, NH 03818 Comm: (603) 447-5448 TTY: (603) 447-3121 File Code: 1950

More information

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction Page 1 of 6 Background DECISION MEMO USDA Forest Service Jefferson Ranger District Jefferson County, Montana Rawhide Trail #7073 is located in the Elkhorn Mountain Range approximately 10 miles east of

More information

Appendix A Appendix A (Project Specifications) Auk Auk / Black Diamond (Trail 44) Reroute

Appendix A Appendix A (Project Specifications) Auk Auk / Black Diamond (Trail 44) Reroute Appendix A (Project Specifications) Auk Auk / Black Diamond (Trail 44) Reroute I. Proposed Action: This project proposes to reroute approximately 1,800 feet of a 50 inch wide trail, off of private property

More information

Mt. Hood National Forest

Mt. Hood National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Mt. Hood National Forest Zigzag Ranger District 70220 E. Highway 26 Zigzag, OR 97049 503-622-3191 Fax: 503-622-5622 File Code: 1950-1 Date: June 29,

More information

Other Agencies and Organizations

Other Agencies and Organizations Daniel Boone National Forest 1700 Bypass Road WInchester, KY 40391 859-745-3100 Location Northern terminus is near Morehead, Kentucky. Southern terminus is located in the Big South Fork NRRA in Tennessee.

More information

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation

Decision Memo for Desolation Trail: Mill D to Desolation Lake Trail Relocation for Salt Lake County, Utah Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 1. Background The present location of the Desolation Trail (#1159) between Mill D and Desolation Lake follows old

More information

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction Background and Purpose and Need The Daisy Dean ATV Trail Construction Project is located in the Little Belt Mountains, Musselshell Ranger District, Lewis and Clark National Forest approximately 32 miles

More information

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action

Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action Kelly Motorized Trails Project Proposed Action November 28, 2011 The Flagstaff Ranger District of the Coconino National Forest is seeking public input on the proposed Kelly Motorized Trails Project (formerly

More information

Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project

Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project Description of the Proposed Action for the Big Creek / Yellow Pine Travel Plan (Snow-free Season) and Big Creek Ford Project Payette National Forest Krassel Ranger District Valley and Idaho Counties, Idaho

More information

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Bradley Brook Relocation Project United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Scoping Notice White Mountain National Forest February 2011 For Information Contact: Jenny Burnett White Mountain

More information

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information United States Forest Coronado National Forest 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road Department of Service Santa Catalina Ranger District

More information

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction Public Scoping: Allocation of Recreation Capacity for Commercial Outfitter Guide Services on North Kruzof Island Trails (Kruzof Island Outfitter Guide) PURPOSE AND NEED Introduction The U.S. Department

More information

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37)

Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37) Decision Memo Ice Age Trail Improvement (CRAC 37) U.S. Forest Service Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Medford-Park Falls Ranger District Taylor County, Wisconsin T32N, R2W, Town of Grover, Section

More information

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018

Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018 Preferred Recreation Recommendations Stemilt-Squilchuck Recreation Plan March 2018 Below are the recommended recreation ideas and strategies that package together the various recreation concepts compiled

More information

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas

National Forests and Grasslands in Texas United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service National Forests and Grasslands in Texas Sam Houston NF 394 FM 1375 West New Waverly, Texas 77358 Phone 936-344-6205 Dear Friends, File Code: 1950

More information

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture

PROPOSED ACTION South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT United States Department of Agriculture United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 6944 South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT 84121 801-733-2660 File Code: 1950/2300 Date:

More information

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land 1.0 Authority 1.1 This rule is promulgated pursuant to 23 V.S.A. 3506. Section 3506 (b)(4) states that an

More information

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS CHAPTER III Trail Design Standards, Specifications & Permits This chapter discusses trail standards, preferred surface types for different activities, permits, and other requirements one must consider

More information

Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project

Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project Tracy Ridge Shared Use Trails and Plan Amendment Project Scoping Document Forest Service Allegheny National Forest Bradford Ranger District McKean, County, Pennsylvania In accordance with Federal civil

More information

Non-motorized Trail Plan & Proposal. August 8, 2014

Non-motorized Trail Plan & Proposal. August 8, 2014 Town of Star Valley Ranch, Wyoming and the Star Valley Ranch Association in partnership with the USDA Forest Service, Bridger-Teton National Forest, Greys River Ranger District Non-motorized Trail Plan

More information

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District P.O. Box 189 Fairfield, ID. 83327 208-764-3202 Fax: 208-764-3211 File Code: 1950/7700 Date: December

More information

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance Legislation, Policy, and Direction Regarding National Scenic Trails The National Trails System Act, P.L. 90-543, was passed

More information

Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail

Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail Rifle Ranger District, White River National Forest Garfield County, Colorado Comments Welcome The Rifle Ranger District of the White River National Forest welcomes your

More information

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation USDA Forest Service Tahoe National Forest February 20, 2015 Introduction The Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture will prepare an Environmental

More information

Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact Middle Citico Equestrian Trail Network

Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact Middle Citico Equestrian Trail Network Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact Middle Citico Equestrian Trail Network USDA Forest Service Tellico Ranger District, Cherokee National Forest Monroe County, Tennessee Decision and Reasons

More information

5.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT

5.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT 5.0 OUTDOOR RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT 5.1 Introduction This section describes the range of recreational activities that currently take place in Marble Range and Edge Hills Parks, as well

More information

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM Backcountry Trail Flood Rehabilitation A June 2013 Flood Recovery Program Summary In June 2013, parts of Southern Alberta were devastated from significant

More information

Cultural Resource Management Report Deer Valley 4wd Restoration and Blue Lakes Road Maintenance Project R

Cultural Resource Management Report Deer Valley 4wd Restoration and Blue Lakes Road Maintenance Project R Cultural Resource Management Report R2015-05-03-10005 Undertaking Description: The proposes to perform road maintenance and meadow restoration on the Deer Valley 4wd trail and road maintenance on the Blue

More information

Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012

Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012 Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012 Background As part of Mass Audubon s mission to preserve the nature of Massachusetts for people and

More information

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa

Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Merced Wild and Scenic River. Comprehensive Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, Madera and Mariposa This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/26/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-04061, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 4312-FF NATIONAL

More information

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project

Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project 06/10/10 Bear Creek Habitat Improvement Project El Paso County, Colorado Pike National Forest and Colorado Springs Utilities Owned Land Report prepared by: Eric Billmeyer Executive Director Rocky Mountain

More information

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands FINAL TESTIMONY 1 STATEMENT OF DALE BOSWORTH CHIEF Of the FOREST SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON FORESTS AND FOREST HEALTH And the SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS,

More information

White Mountain National Forest. Pond of Safety Accessible Trail & Shoreline Access Project. Scoping Report. Township of Randolph Coos County, NH

White Mountain National Forest. Pond of Safety Accessible Trail & Shoreline Access Project. Scoping Report. Township of Randolph Coos County, NH White Mountain National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Pond of Safety Accessible Trail & Shoreline Access Project Township of Randolph Coos County, NH Scoping

More information

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for Management v. 120803 Introduction The following Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) characterizations and matrices mirror the presentation in the ROS Primer and Field

More information

September 14, Comments of the Colorado Trail Foundation On the USFS Scoping Notice of August 13, 2010 RE: the relocation of the CDNST/CT Page 1

September 14, Comments of the Colorado Trail Foundation On the USFS Scoping Notice of August 13, 2010 RE: the relocation of the CDNST/CT Page 1 THE COLORADO TRAIL FOUNDATION Comments on the U.S. Forest Service Scoping Notice of August 13, 2010 Regarding the Relocation of THE COLORADO TRAIL AND CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL From La Garita

More information

Buffalo Pass Trails Project

Buffalo Pass Trails Project Buffalo Pass Trails Project Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District, Medicine Bow-Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland Routt County, Colorado T6N 83W Sections 3-5, 8; T6N 84W Sections

More information

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed action to add trails and trailheads to the Red Rock District trail system.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed action to add trails and trailheads to the Red Rock District trail system. July 14, 2010 Jennifer Burns Red Rock Ranger District PO Box 20429 Sedona, AZ 86341 Flagstaff Biking Organization PO Box 23851 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 Dear Jennifer- Thank you for the opportunity to comment

More information

PROPOSED PARK ALTERNATIVES

PROPOSED PARK ALTERNATIVES 8 Chimne y Rock State Park M a ster Pl an 2011 PROPOSED PARK ALTERNATIVES Introduction Three different park development concepts were prepared and presented to the citizens of North Carolina through a

More information

APPENDIX D: SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN. APPENDICES Town of Chili Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update

APPENDIX D: SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN. APPENDICES Town of Chili Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update APPENDIX D: SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN APPENDICES Town of Chili Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update Sustainable Trail Construction Sustainable trails are defined by the US Forest Service as trails having

More information

The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired

The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired 1 The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired the Chu property for open space with a contribution

More information

Trail Assessment Report

Trail Assessment Report Trail Assessment Report Trail Options for the Bear Creek Canyon located in Pikes Peak Ranger District, Pike National Forest and on Colorado Springs Utility Lands Due to the presence of a unique species

More information

St. Joe Travel Management EA CULTURAL RESOURCES

St. Joe Travel Management EA CULTURAL RESOURCES St. Joe Travel Management EA CULTURAL RESOURCES Bruce Gibson May 2015 Regulatory Framework Forest Plan The Idaho Panhandle National Forests (IPNF) Forest Plan requires systematic cultural resource inventory

More information

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit USDA Forest Service Mississippi Bluffs Ranger District, Shawnee National Forest Jackson and Union Counties, Illinois Proposed Action

More information

Appendix 3. Greenway Design Standards. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

Appendix 3. Greenway Design Standards. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan Appendix 3 Greenway Design Standards This chapter discusses two design standards for the greenway types discussed above. First, trail design standards are presented together with trailhead facilities and

More information

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area. RECREATION Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area. OPPORTUNITIES FOR SOLITUDE / QUIET TRAILS. One attraction

More information

Memo. Board of County Commissioners. FROM: Tamra Allen, Planner. Buford/New Castle Motorized Trail. Date: February 13, 2012

Memo. Board of County Commissioners. FROM: Tamra Allen, Planner. Buford/New Castle Motorized Trail. Date: February 13, 2012 Memo TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Tamra Allen, Planner RE: Buford/New Castle Motorized Trail Date: February 13, 2012 Overview The White River National Forest Rifle District Office ( RDO ) issued

More information

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts

RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Preliminary Ideas and Concepts September 30, 2016 Superintendent Yosemite National Park Attn: Wilderness Stewardship Plan P.O. Box 577 Yosemite, CA 95389 RE: Access Fund Comments on Yosemite National Park Wilderness Stewardship Plan,

More information

S Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016

S Central Coast Heritage Protection Act APRIL 21, 2016 STATEMENT OF GLENN CASAMASSA ASSOCIATE DEPUTY CHIEF, NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM U.S. FOREST SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES

More information

Thank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

Thank you for this third opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan. March 19, 2014 Flagstaff Biking Organization PO Box 23851 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 Vern Keller Coconino National Forest Attn: Plan Revision 1824 South Thompson Street Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 coconino_national_forest_plan_revision_team@fs.fed.us

More information

Finn Creek Park. Management Direction Statement Amendment

Finn Creek Park. Management Direction Statement Amendment Finn Creek Park Management Direction Statement Amendment November 2013 Management Direction Statement Amendment Approved by: Jeff Leahy Regional Director, Thompson Cariboo BC Parks November 12, 2013 Date

More information

Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS. Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement. [3411-15-P] DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Angeles National Forest; Los Angeles County, CA Williamson Rock/Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail (PCT) Project EIS AGENCY: ACTION: Forest Service,

More information

Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District

Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Santa Catalina Ranger District File Code: 1950 Date: October 14, 2015 Dear Interested Party: The Santa Catalina Ranger District

More information

Hiawatha National Forest St. Ignace Ranger District. File Code: 1950 Date: August 5, 2011

Hiawatha National Forest St. Ignace Ranger District. File Code: 1950 Date: August 5, 2011 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Hiawatha National Forest St. Ignace Ranger District W1900 West US-2 St. Ignace, MI 49781 906-643-7900 File Code: 1950 Date: August 5, 2011 Dear National

More information

Decision Memo Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race. Recreation Event

Decision Memo Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race. Recreation Event Decision Memo 2015 Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race Recreation Event USDA Forest Service Ketchum Ranger District, Sawtooth National Forest Blaine County, Idaho Background The

More information

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative.

Section II. Planning & Public Process Planning for the Baker/Carver Regional Trail began in 2010 as a City of Minnetrista initiative. Section II Planning & Public Process Planning for the began in 2010 as a City of initiative. city staff began discussions with the Park District on the possibility of a north/south regional trail connection

More information

Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011

Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011 Fossil Creek Wild & Scenic River Comprehensive River Management Plan Forest Service Proposed Action - details March 28, 2011 Primary Goals of the Proposed Action 1. Maintain or enhance ORVs primarily by

More information

MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Biscuit Run State Park Scottsville Road (State Route 20) Charlottesville, VA 22902 Biscuit Run State Park MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Planning and

More information

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT The City has been successful in establishing dedicated local funding sources as well as applying for grants to develop the City s trail system, having received nearly $2.4

More information

Lakes Landscape Travel Management

Lakes Landscape Travel Management Decision Notice & Finding of No Significant Impact Lakes Landscape Travel Management USDA Forest Service Columbine Ranger District, San Juan National Forest Archuleta, Hinsdale, and La Plata Counties,

More information

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating. Parks, Open Space and Trails PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAILS PLAN CONTENTS The components of the trails plan are: Intent Definitions Goals, Policies, and Action Strategies Trails Map

More information

BACKGROUND DECISION. Decision Memo Page 1 of 6

BACKGROUND DECISION. Decision Memo Page 1 of 6 DECISION MEMO DEVIL S ELBOW BY-PASS, BOUNDARY TRAIL NO.1 U.S. FOREST SERVICE T9N, R7E, SECTION 9 RANGE 5E COWLITZ COUNTY WA MOUNT ST. HELENS NATIONAL VOLCANIC MONUMENT, GIFFORD PINCHOT NATIONAL FOREST

More information

To: Cam Hooley From: Trails 2000 Date: September 30, 2016 Re: Hermosa Comments. Dear Cam:

To: Cam Hooley From: Trails 2000 Date: September 30, 2016 Re: Hermosa Comments. Dear Cam: ! To: Cam Hooley From: Trails 2000 Date: September 30, 2016 Re: Hermosa Comments Dear Cam: Trails 2000 is commenting on the Forest Service Management Plan for the Hermosa Creek Watershed Management Plan

More information

Final Recreation Report. Sunflower Allotment Grazing Analysis. July 2015

Final Recreation Report. Sunflower Allotment Grazing Analysis. July 2015 Final Recreation Report Sunflower Allotment Grazing Analysis July 2015 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Affected Environment... 3 Four Peaks Wilderness Area... 3 Dispersed Recreation... 3 Environmental

More information

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008

Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008 Hermosa Area Preservation The Colorado Trail Foundation 4/11/2008 Legend d o Tr ail NPA - National Protection Area ra NCA - National Conservation Area o e C Th The Colorado Trail lo FS inventoried Roadless

More information

Table of Contents. page 3 Long term Goals Project Scope Project History. 4 User Groups Defined Trail Representative Committee. 5 Trail Users Breakdown

Table of Contents. page 3 Long term Goals Project Scope Project History. 4 User Groups Defined Trail Representative Committee. 5 Trail Users Breakdown Launched April 27th, 2010 1 Table of Contents page 3 Long term Goals Project Scope Project History 4 User Groups Defined Trail Representative Committee 5 Trail Users Breakdown 13 Trail Users Desires 16

More information

Wilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics. What s the difference? Why does it matter?

Wilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics. What s the difference? Why does it matter? Introduction Wilderness Character and Wilderness Characteristics What s the difference? Why does it matter? The terms wilderness character and wilderness characteristics are sometimes used interchangeably

More information

1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO (719) TTY (719)

1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO (719) TTY (719) USDA Forest Service Rio Grande National Forest http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/riogrande 1803 West Hwy 160 Monte Vista, CO 81144 (719)852-5941 TTY (719)852-6271 USDI Bureau of Land Management San Luis Valley Center

More information

Piedra River Protection Workgroup Meeting #5 Feb. 21, 2012 Ross Aragon Community Center, Pagosa Springs

Piedra River Protection Workgroup Meeting #5 Feb. 21, 2012 Ross Aragon Community Center, Pagosa Springs Piedra River Protection Workgroup Meeting #5 Feb. 21, 2012 Ross Aragon Community Center, Pagosa Springs What happened at this meeting? - Identified conservation easements - Discussed In-stream Flows -

More information

White Mountain National Forest

White Mountain National Forest White Mountain National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Moat Mountain Trail System Project Environmental Assessment Saco Ranger District September 2010 For

More information

Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering

Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering Joseph Raffaele Outdoor Recreation Planner U.S. Bureau of Land Management Yuma, Arizona Creating a User-Driven Long-Distance OHV Trail Through Partnering BLM is a multiple-use land management agency within

More information

Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District

Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 6944 South 3000 East Salt Lake City, UT 84121 801-733-2660 File Code: 1950/2300 Date:

More information

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018

Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP September 5, 2018 Wilderness Process #NP-1810: Your letter ID is NP-1810-2602-96 September 5, 2018 RE: GMUG Wilderness Evaluation Revised Evaluation Criteria and Draft Report Forest Revision Planning Team: The Continental

More information

DATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America. RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1

DATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America. RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1 The purpose of the Accessible Trails Checklist (below) is to help the community review

More information

Kit Carson-Challenger Ridge Trail Project Annual Performance Report-2014 October 22, 2014

Kit Carson-Challenger Ridge Trail Project Annual Performance Report-2014 October 22, 2014 1 Kit Carson-Challenger Ridge Trail Project Annual Performance Report-2014 October 22, 2014 Willow Lake and Kit Carson Peak 2 SUMMARY The Rocky Mountain Field Institute began Phase 1 of a multi-phase,

More information

Thank you for this second opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan.

Thank you for this second opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions to the Coconino National Forest Management plan. March 8, 2011 Flagstaff Biking Organization PO Box 23851 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 Yewah Lau Coconino National Forest Attn: Plan Revision 1824 South Thompson Street Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Sent via electronic

More information

Chattahoochee- Oconee National Forests. Decision Memo

Chattahoochee- Oconee National Forests. Decision Memo Page 1 of 6 USDA Forest Service Chattahoochee- Oconee National Forests Decision Memo Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests Home Page Recreation Information Forest History Forest Facts Forest Management

More information

South Colony Basin Recreation Fee Proposal

South Colony Basin Recreation Fee Proposal South Colony Basin Recreation Fee Proposal Purpose and Need for Collecting Fees in South Colony Basin: Forest Service appropriated funds have not been sufficient to maintain current recreational services

More information

White Mountain National Forest

White Mountain National Forest White Mountain National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Eastern Region Boles Brook Snowmobile Bridge Decision Memo Boles Brook Snowmobile Bridge Project Town of Woodstock

More information

Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding

Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding Project Planning, Compliance, and Funding The plans above offer high level guidance to ensure that the A.T. is managed effectively as a whole unit in a decentralized management structure. Cooperative management

More information

Special Recreation Management Areas Extensive Recreation Management Areas Public Lands Not Designated as Recreation Management Areas

Special Recreation Management Areas Extensive Recreation Management Areas Public Lands Not Designated as Recreation Management Areas From the Proposed RMP: Special Recreation Management Areas SRMAs are an administrative unit where the existing or proposed recreation opportunities and recreation setting characteristics are recognized

More information

Connie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park

Connie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park and Curecanti National Recreation Area Information Brochure #1 Wilderness and Backcountry Management Plan

More information

March 14, SUBJECT: Public input to the Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office, Travel Management Plan

March 14, SUBJECT: Public input to the Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office, Travel Management Plan March 14, 2019 Delivered via email to ewaters@blm.gov Elijah Waters Field Manager BLM Gunnison Field Office Gunnison, CO 81230 SUBJECT: Public input to the Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office,

More information

Wallace Falls State Park Classification and Management Planning Stage 3 Preliminary Recommendations July 18, 2018 Sultan City Hall

Wallace Falls State Park Classification and Management Planning Stage 3 Preliminary Recommendations July 18, 2018 Sultan City Hall Wallace Falls State Park Classification and Management Planning Stage 3 Preliminary Recommendations July 18, 2018 Sultan City Hall Thanks for coming! This document contains State Parks preliminary recommendations

More information

Land Management Summary

Land Management Summary photo credit: ANGAIR Anglesea Heath Land Management Summary The Anglesea Heath (6,501 ha) was incorporated into the Great Otway National Park in January 2018. This provides an opportunity to consider the

More information

Understanding user expectations And planning for long term sustainability 1

Understanding user expectations And planning for long term sustainability 1 Understanding user expectations And planning for long term sustainability 1 What is a natural surface trail? It can be as simple has a mineral soil, mulched or graveled pathway, or as developed as elevated

More information

Response to Public Comments

Response to Public Comments Appendix D Response to Public Comments Comment Letter # Response 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,

More information

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis

Flow Stand Up Paddle Board Parkway Plan Analysis Regional Parks Department Jeffrey R. Leatherman, Director County of Sacramento Divisions Administration Golf Leisure Services Maintenance Rangers Therapeutic Recreation Services Flow Stand Up Paddle Board

More information

National Recreation Trail Application for Designation

National Recreation Trail Application for Designation National Recreation Trail Application for Designation Introduction Thank you for your interest in the National Recreation Trail (NRT) program. Completed NRT application packages must be submitted by December

More information

13.1 REGIONAL TOURISM ISSUES AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

13.1 REGIONAL TOURISM ISSUES AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 13 REGIONAL TOURISM T he County of Mariposa s recreation needs and facilities fall within two categories: regional tourism and local recreation. This Element focuses on regional tourism issues related

More information

Understanding the caring capacity of the visitor experience Provide facilities to support a high level user experience Address visual quality through

Understanding the caring capacity of the visitor experience Provide facilities to support a high level user experience Address visual quality through Understanding the caring capacity of the visitor experience Provide facilities to support a high level user experience Address visual quality through recreation ecological restoration opportunities Collaboration

More information

BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE

BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE November 24, 2014-4:00 P.M. ITEM NO. 1.00 2.00 Call to order Golden Valley Bank, 190 Cohasset Rd. Chico, CA 95926 (park in center of lot) Pledge of allegiance to

More information

David Johnson. Tom, Attached please find the final scoping letter and figures for your review. David

David Johnson. Tom, Attached please find the final scoping letter and figures for your review. David David Johnson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: David Johnson Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:33 PM Thomas Malecek Dave Dyer; Jason Marks (jmarks@segroup.com) VWC Scoping Letter

More information

INTRODUCTION. Mailing address: Burke County Community Development Attn: Tim Johnson P. O. Box 219 Morganton, NC

INTRODUCTION. Mailing address: Burke County Community Development Attn: Tim Johnson P. O. Box 219 Morganton, NC REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: PROFESSIONAL, EXPERIENCED TRAIL BUILDERS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FONTA FLORA STATE TRAIL LAKE JAMES SECTION BURKE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION Burke County

More information

Sibley LUPA. Board Executive Committee Meeting December 7, 2017

Sibley LUPA. Board Executive Committee Meeting December 7, 2017 Sibley LUPA Board Executive Committee Meeting December 7, 2017 Project Location & Project Area 1,318-acre Robert Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve Project Area Purpose Project Purpose & Goals Append the

More information