Annex 1 Revised TEE, AMCB and Public Accounts Tables Print Version

Transcription

1 Annex 1 Revised TEE, AMCB and Public Accounts Tables Print Version NB. The Excel file also includes the BAFB and Full approval cost tables. South Yorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval September 2013

2 This Page is intentional blank South Yorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval September 2013

3 Page 1 PA BAFB Volume 1: Economic Case South Yorkshire Bus Rapid Transit Northern Route Table 8.1 Summary of Public Accounts Table Element Present Value ( in 2002 prices, discounted to 2002) PE FA FA (with tram-train test) Local Government Funding Revenue Operating Costs 3,252,366 2,987,640 2,987,640 Investment Costs 3,706,496 1,083,532 1,083,532 Developer and Other Contributions -1,507,570-1,092,284-1,092,284 Grant/Subsidy Payments NET IMPACT 5,451,292 2,978,888 2,978,888 Central Government Funding: Transport Revenue Operating costs Investment Costs 22,559,908 13,993,716 13,993,716 Developer and Other Contributions Grant/Subsidy Payments NET IMPACT 22,559,908 13,993,716 13,993,716 Central Government Funding: Non-Transport Indirect Tax Revenues 3,325,047 3,325,047 3,325,047 TOTALS Broad Transport Budget 28,011,200 16,972,605 16,972,605 Wider Public Finances 3,325,047 3,325,047 3,325,047 South Yorkshire BRT Northern Route FullApproval - September 2013

4 Page 2 TEE BAFB Volume 1: Economic Case South Yorkshire Bus Rapid Transit Northern Route Table 5.1 Benefits to Business Users and Transport Providers Present Value Benefits ( in 2002 market prices discounted to 2002) PE FA FA (with tramtrain test) User benefits ALL MODES Travel time 32,180,956 32,180,956 0 Vehicle operating costs 4,626,350 4,626,350 0 User charges ,303,136 During Construction & Maintenance -319, ,991 4,397,333 Subtotal 36,487,315 36,487,315 33,700,469 Private sector provider impacts Revenue 8,181,848 8,181,848 33,380,478 Operating costs -20,224,000-20,224,000 0 Investment costs -687, ,000 8,738,833 Grant/subsidy ,224,000 Subtotal -12,729,152-12,729,152 21,895,311 Other business impacts Developer contributions -1,507,570-1,092,284-1,092,284 NET BUSINESS IMPACT 22,250,593 22,665,879 54,503,497 South Yorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval - September 2013

5 Page 3 TEE Table 7.1 Benefits to Commuting and Other Non Business Users Present Value Benefits ( in 2002 market prices discounted to 2002) PE FA FA (with tram-train test) Non-business: Commuting ALL MODES User benefits Travel time 26,524,680 26,524,680 22,582,088 Vehicle operating costs 1,223,674 1,223,674 1,017,803 User charges During Construction & Maintenance NET NON-BUSINESS BENEFITS: COMMUTING -238, , ,587 27,509,767 27,509,767 23,361,304 Non-business: Other User benefits Travel time 41,520,593 41,520,593 36,297,342 Vehicle operating costs 875, , ,533 User charges During Construction & Maintenance -340, , ,687 NET NON-BUSINESS BENEFITS: OTHER 42,055,798 42,055,798 36,685,187 TOTAL NON BUSINESS BENEFITS 69,565,565 69,565,565 60,046,490 South Yorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval - September 2013

6 Page 4 AMCB BAFB VFM Summary Report - Table 2: Monetised Impacts m 2002 market prices and values at Stage: PE FA FA (with TramTrain Test) Factors from TUBA runs used to adjust benefit at FA to reflect tram-train trial Noise % Local Air Quality % Greenhouse Gases % Accidents % Time and Cost Highway PT Highway PT Highway PT Highway PT Non-business users % 77.8% Business users and providers % 99.7% Wider Cost to Government % Developer Contribution (S106 contribution - reduced from outturn 3.2m to 2.2m) Present Value of Benefits Present value of Costs (Reduction in expected investment costs from PE) NPV BCR Reliability Business % Reliability Non-Business % Wider Impacts % BCR incl Wider Impacts and Reliability South Yorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval - September 2013

7 Page 5 Funding VFM Summary Report - Table 3: Revised Funding Shares at Outturn prices expected at date of submission BAFB Change MSBC Change (9/2011) BAFB>FA (6/2010) MSBC- >BAFB m (%) m (%) m Central Government % % -of which Full Approval (9/13) m m Department for Transport % ERDF % Not bid Local Authority % % Third Party % % Total % % South Yorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval - September 2013

8 Environmental Economy Page 6 AST at PE Appraisal Summary Table Date produced: 02/09/2011 Contact: Name of scheme: Description of scheme: South Yorkshire Bus Rapid Transit Northern Route - Core Scenario The proposed BRT system connects the centres of Rotherham and Sheffield to each other and to existing and proposed developments in the Lower Don Valley Name Organisation Role David Andrews SYPTE Promoter/Official Impacts Business users & transport providers Reliability impact on Business users Regeneration Summary of key impacts The scheme reduces travel time for business travellers by both road and public transport The scheme helps to relieve the roundabouts at Junction 34 of the M1 Motorway, by reducing the cross-flows. Congestion at this junction is a very significant barrier to regeneration, a bigger barrier than is suffered anywhere else in the county. The scheme will make the regeneration area accessbile to a number of additional workers mainly by improving public transport access. Quantitative Value of journey time changes( ) 32,181,000 Net journey time changes ( ) 0 to 2min 2 to 5min > 5min 24,362,000 6,229,000 1,590,000 Additional workers: PT 13,158 (+ 9%), Car +979 (+ 0.44%) Assessment Qualitative Monetary Distributional (NPV) 7-pt scale/ vulnerable grp 32,181,000 1,910,000 Wider Impacts Noise The scheme improves transport provision, bringing workers and industries closer together to provide wider benefits. A byproduct of the scheme is an that it factilitates the right turn from the road opposite where Tinsley Link joins Sheffield Road, encouraging traffic to choose this route which has more residential proporties than the alternative longer route. Agglomeration : 4.3m benefit Imperfectly Competitive Markets : 3.6m benefit Impact on GDP of more people working : 1.4m disbenefit Population annoyed Without Scheme 44,648 With Scheme 44,758 Improvement ,500,000-2,764,317 0%-20%: 20%-40%: 40%-60%: 60%-80%: 80%-100%: Air Quality The scheme causes a net reduction in car travel reducing overall emissions. Rerouting means there are winners and losers and the winners outnumber the losers in both years for both NOx and PM10. Nox Winners 80 Zones in 2015; 201 Zones in 2030 Losers 60 Zones in 2015; 11 Zones in 2030 PM10 Winners 95 Zones in 2015; 196 Zones in 2030 Losers 68 Zones in 2015; 14 Zones in ,896 0%-20%: PPP 20%-40%: P 80%-100%: PP Children (Home): PP Greenhouse gases Landscape The scheme leads to a net reduction in car travel and greenhouse gas emissions. The new Tinsley Link passes through a brownfield regeneration site (formerly a coal-fired power station) passing under the viaduct that carries M1 across the Don Valley. The link and will be designed to minimise any adverse impacts. Change in non-traded carbon over 60y (CO2e) Change in traded carbon over 60y (CO2e) -6,320 1,038,000 - Townscape Heritage of Historic resources Biodiversity In the town, the scheme runs on existing roads with some priority measures. The proposed scheme will have a small impact on the townscape resulting from mode shift away from car. The scheme does not involve any interventions or highway widening in the vicinity of identified listed buildings thus there will be no significant impact. The Tinsley Link crosses a brown field regeneration site, a river, and a canal. There are some sites of medium importance but sites of biological or heritage significance are not affected by the scheme. In fact, there will be some slight improvements at nearby sites caused by mode-shift away from car. Water Environment The Tinsley Link crosses the River Don and the Tinsley Canal. The site is subject to flooding and the scheme design has taken this into account in terms of the bridge for the Tinsley Link and the need to mitigate impacts on the flood plain. Impacts will be slight because water quality is classed as poor at the crossing point South Yorkshire BRT Norther Route Full Approval September 2013

9 Public Accounts Social Page 7 AST at PE Commuting and Other users Reliability impact on Commuting and Other users The scheme reduces travel time for travellers by both public transport and road. The scheme helps to relieve the roundabouts at Junction 34 of the M1 Mototrway, by reducing the cross-flows. Congestion at this junction is a very significant barrier to regeneration, a bigger barrier than is suffered anywhere else in the county. Value of journey time changes( ) 68,045,000 Net journey time changes ( ) 0 to 2min 2 to 5min > 5min 22,888,000 17,680,000 27,477,000 3,025,000 0%-20%: PPP 20%-40%: P Physical activity The scheme will encourage model shift from car to public transport increasing the distances people walk. Around 650 people a day will switch from car use to public transport. Journey quality Cleaner, newer, low-floor buses with EURO VI engines Realtime passenger information Enhanced shelters - well lit, with clear glazing, ramped access and seating plust help points and CCTV Around 7500 passengers a day will benefit from the improvements Moderate benefical Accidents Security Access to services The scheme reduces car travel and therefore accident levels CCTV at stops and help points where passengers can speak to staff. Attention to lighting on signing of information and help points The scheme improves the access to key services of noncar-owning households. Access to the main centres of Sheffield, Rotherham and Meadowhall is not significantly improved as these centres are already well connected by public transport. Change in casualties over 60 years -0.2 Fatal, +0.3 Serious, Slight Increase in numbers of non-car-owning households within 30 minutes of serives: GPs : 93 Primary Schools : 277 Secondary Schools : 194 Moderate benefical 787,000 0%-20%: P 20%-40%: 80%-100%: P Non-car owning households P Affordability Neither reduces or increases public transport fares Severance The scheme reduces traffic on local roads reducing serverance. The scheme opens up an area of land that pedestrians and cyclists could not cross when it was under private ownership - making some journeys more direct The scheme provided slight benefit to around 350 links in the network and moderate benefits to 1. Option values Cost to Broad Transport Budget Funding is being sought from the department for 56% of the cost of the scheme. Indirect Tax Revenues The scheme encourages mode shift away from car, which will reduce the sum that the government receives from fuel duty and VAT 28,011,200 3,325,047 South Yorkshire BRT Norther Route Full Approval September 2013

10 Environmental Economy Page 8 AST at FA Appraisal Summary Table Date produced: 19/09/2013 Contact: Name of scheme: Description of scheme: South Yorkshire Bus Rapid Transit Northern Route - Core Scenario The proposed BRT system connects the centres of Rotherham and Sheffield to each other and to existing and proposed developments in the Lower Don Valley Name Organisation Role David Andrews SYPTE Promoter/Official Impacts Business users & transport providers Reliability impact on Business users Regeneration Summary of key impacts The scheme reduces travel time for business travellers by both road and public transport The scheme helps to relieve the roundabouts at Junction 34 of the M1 Motorway, by reducing the cross-flows. Congestion at this junction is a very significant barrier to regeneration, a bigger barrier than is suffered anywhere else in the county. The scheme will make the regeneration area accessbile to a number of additional workers mainly by improving public transport access. Quantitative Value of journey time changes( ) 32,181,000 Net journey time changes ( ) 0 to 2min 2 to 5min > 5min 24,362,000 6,229,000 1,590,000 Additional workers: PT 13,158 (+ 9%), Car +979 (+ 0.44%) Assessment Qualitative Monetary Distributional (NPV) 7-pt scale/ vulnerable grp 32,181,000 1,910,000 Wider Impacts Noise The scheme improves transport provision, bringing workers and industries closer together to provide wider benefits. A byproduct of the scheme is an that it factilitates the right turn from the road opposite where Tinsley Link joins Sheffield Road, encouraging traffic to choose this route which has more residential proporties than the alternative longer route. Agglomeration : 4.3m benefit Imperfectly Competitive Markets : 3.6m benefit Impact on GDP of more people working : 1.4m disbenefit Population annoyed Without Scheme 44,648 With Scheme 44,758 Improvement ,500,000-2,764,317 0%-20%: 20%-40%: 40%-60%: 60%-80%: 80%-100%: Air Quality The scheme causes a net reduction in car travel reducing overall emissions. Rerouting means there are winners and losers and the winners outnumber the losers in both years for both NOx and PM10. Nox Winners 80 Zones in 2015; 201 Zones in 2030 Losers 60 Zones in 2015; 11 Zones in 2030 PM10 Winners 95 Zones in 2015; 196 Zones in 2030 Losers 68 Zones in 2015; 14 Zones in ,896 0%-20%: PPP 20%-40%: P 80%-100%: PP Children (Home): PP Greenhouse gases Landscape The scheme leads to a net reduction in car travel and greenhouse gas emissions. The new Tinsley Link passes through a brownfield regeneration site (formerly a coal-fired power station) passing under the viaduct that carries M1 across the Don Valley. The link and will be designed to minimise any adverse impacts. Change in non-traded carbon over 60y (CO2e) Change in traded carbon over 60y (CO2e) -6,320 1,038,000 - Townscape Heritage of Historic resources Biodiversity In the town, the scheme runs on existing roads with some priority measures. The proposed scheme will have a small impact on the townscape resulting from mode shift away from car. The scheme does not involve any interventions or highway widening in the vicinity of identified listed buildings thus there will be no significant impact. The Tinsley Link crosses a brown field regeneration site, a river, and a canal. There are some sites of medium importance but sites of biological or heritage significance are not affected by the scheme. In fact, there will be some slight improvements at nearby sites caused by mode-shift away from car. Water Environment The Tinsley Link crosses the River Don and the Tinsley Canal. The site is subject to flooding and the scheme design has taken this into account in terms of the bridge for the Tinsley Link and the need to mitigate impacts on the flood plain. Impacts will be slight because water quality is classed as poor at the crossing point SouthYorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval - September 2013

11 Public Accounts Social Page 9 AST at FA Commuting and Other users Reliability impact on Commuting and Other users The scheme reduces travel time for travellers by both public transport and road. The scheme helps to relieve the roundabouts at Junction 34 of the M1 Mototrway, by reducing the cross-flows. Congestion at this junction is a very significant barrier to regeneration, a bigger barrier than is suffered anywhere else in the county. Value of journey time changes( ) 68,045,000 Net journey time changes ( ) 0 to 2min 2 to 5min > 5min 22,888,000 17,680,000 27,477,000 3,025,000 0%-20%: PPP 20%-40%: P Physical activity The scheme will encourage model shift from car to public transport increasing the distances people walk. Around 650 people a day will switch from car use to public transport. Journey quality Cleaner, newer, low-floor buses with EURO VI engines Realtime passenger information Enhanced shelters - well lit, with clear glazing, ramped access and seating plust help points and CCTV Around 7500 passengers a day will benefit from the improvements Moderate benefical Accidents Security Access to services The scheme reduces car travel and therefore accident levels CCTV at stops and help points where passengers can speak to staff. Attention to lighting on signing of information and help points The scheme improves the access to key services of noncar-owning households. Access to the main centres of Sheffield, Rotherham and Meadowhall is not significantly improved as these centres are already well connected by public transport. Change in casualties over 60 years -0.2 Fatal, +0.3 Serious, Slight Increase in numbers of non-car-owning households within 30 minutes of serives: GPs : 93 Primary Schools : 277 Secondary Schools : 194 Moderate benefical 787,000 0%-20%: P 20%-40%: 80%-100%: P Non-car owning households P Affordability Neither reduces or increases public transport fares Severance The scheme reduces traffic on local roads reducing serverance. The scheme opens up an area of land that pedestrians and cyclists could not cross when it was under private ownership - making some journeys more direct The scheme provided slight benefit to around 350 links in the network and moderate benefits to 1. Option values Cost to Broad Transport Budget Funding is being sought from the department for 56% of the cost of the scheme. Indirect Tax Revenues The scheme encourages mode shift away from car, which will reduce the sum that the government receives from fuel duty and VAT 16,972,605 3,325,047 SouthYorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval - September 2013

12 Environmental Economy Page 10 AST at FA with TT test Appraisal Summary Table Date produced: 19/09/2013 Contact: Name of scheme: Description of scheme: South Yorkshire Bus Rapid Transit Northern Route - Core Scenario The proposed BRT system connects the centres of Rotherham and Sheffield to each other and to existing and proposed developments in the Lower Don Valley Name Organisation Role David Andrews SYPTE Promoter/Official Impacts Business users & transport providers Reliability impact on Business users Regeneration Summary of key impacts The scheme reduces travel time for business travellers by both road and public transport The scheme helps to relieve the roundabouts at Junction 34 of the M1 Motorway, by reducing the cross-flows. Congestion at this junction is a very significant barrier to regeneration, a bigger barrier than is suffered anywhere else in the county. The scheme will make the regeneration area accessbile to a number of additional workers mainly by improving public transport access. Quantitative Value of journey time changes( ) Net journey time changes ( ) 0 to 2min 2 to 5min > 5min Additional workers: PT 13,158 (+ 9%), Car +979 (+ 0.44%) Assessment Qualitative Monetary Distributional (NPV) 7-pt scale/ vulnerable grp - 1,767,260 Wider Impacts Noise The scheme improves transport provision, bringing workers and industries closer together to provide wider benefits. A byproduct of the scheme is an that it facilitates the right turn from the road opposite where Tinsley Link joins Sheffield Road, encouraging traffic to choose this route which has more residential properties than the alternative longer route. Agglomeration : 3.9m benefit Imperfectly Competitive Markets : 3.3m benefit Impact on GDP of more people working : 1.3m disbenefit Population annoyed Without Scheme 44,648 With Scheme 44,758 Improvement ,804,380-2,636,905 0%-20%: 20%-40%: 40%-60%: 60%-80%: 80%-100%: Air Quality The scheme causes a net reduction in car travel reducing overall emissions. Rerouting means there are winners and losers and the winners outnumber the losers in both years for both NOx and PM10. Nox Winners 80 Zones in 2015; 201 Zones in 2030 Losers 60 Zones in 2015; 11 Zones in 2030 PM10 Winners 95 Zones in 2015; 196 Zones in 2030 Losers 68 Zones in 2015; 14 Zones in ,095 0%-20%: PPP 20%-40%: P 80%-100%: PP Children (Home): PP Greenhouse gases Landscape The scheme leads to a net reduction in car travel and greenhouse gas emissions. The new Tinsley Link passes through a brownfield regeneration site (formerly a coal-fired power station) passing under the viaduct that carries M1 across the Don Valley. The link and will be designed to minimise any adverse impacts. Change in non-traded carbon over 60y (CO2e) Change in traded carbon over 60y (CO2e) -6, ,157 - Townscape Heritage of Historic resources Biodiversity In the town, the scheme runs on existing roads with some priority measures. The proposed scheme will have a small impact on the townscape resulting from mode shift away from car. The scheme does not involve any interventions or highway widening in the vicinity of identified listed buildings thus there will be no significant impact. The Tinsley Link crosses a brown field regeneration site, a river, and a canal. There are some sites of medium importance but sites of biological or heritage significance are not affected by the scheme. In fact, there will be some slight improvements at nearby sites caused by mode-shift away from car. Water Environment The Tinsley Link crosses the River Don and the Tinsley Canal. The site is subject to flooding and the scheme design has taken this into account in terms of the bridge for the Tinsley Link and the need to mitigate impacts on the flood plain. Impacts will be slight because water quality is classed as poor at the crossing point South Yorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval - September 2013

13 Public Accounts Social Page 11 AST at FA with TT test Commuting and Other users Reliability impact on Commuting and Other users The scheme reduces travel time for travellers by both public transport and road. The scheme helps to relieve the roundabouts at Junction 34 of the M1 Mototrway, by reducing the cross-flows. Congestion at this junction is a very significant barrier to regeneration, a bigger barrier than is suffered anywhere else in the county. Value of journey time changes( ) 58,879,000 Net journey time changes ( ) 0 to 2min 2 to 5min > 5min 19,804,873 15,298,416 23,775,711 2,988,135 0%-20%: PPP 20%-40%: P Physical activity The scheme will encourage model shift from car to public transport increasing the distances people walk. Around 570 people a day will switch from car use to public transport. Journey quality Cleaner, newer, low-floor buses with EURO VI engines Realtime passenger information Enhanced shelters - well lit, with clear glazing, ramped access and seating plust help points and CCTV Around 6600 passengers a day will benefit from the improvements Moderate benefical Accidents Security Access to services The scheme reduces car travel and therefore accident levels CCTV at stops and help points where passengers can speak to staff. Attention to lighting on signing of information and help points The scheme improves the access to key services of noncar-owning households. Access to the main centres of Sheffield, Rotherham and Meadowhall is not significantly improved as these centres are already well connected by public transport. Change in casualties over 60 years -0.2 Fatal, +0.3 Serious, Slight Increase in numbers of non-car-owning households within 30 minutes of serives: GPs : 93 Primary Schools : 277 Secondary Schools : 194 Moderate benefical 750,726 0%-20%: P 20%-40%: 80%-100%: P Non-car owning households P Affordability Neither reduces or increases public transport fares Severance The scheme reduces traffic on local roads reducing serverance. The scheme opens up an area of land that pedestrians and cyclists could not cross when it was under private ownership - making some journeys more direct The scheme provided slight benefit to around 350 links in the network and moderate benefits to 1. Option values Cost to Broad Transport Budget Funding is being sought from the department for 56% of the cost of the scheme. Indirect Tax Revenues The scheme encourages mode shift away from car, which will reduce the sum that the government receives from fuel duty and VAT 16,972,605 3,325,047 South Yorkshire BRT Northern Route Full Approval - September 2013